Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Have _I_ got a bridge for you!

0 views
Skip to first unread message

mikea

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 12:16:53 PM12/17/09
to
Free to good homes; all you have to do is show up, pick one or both up,
and take them away.

<http://www.odot.org/env-programs/bridges/index.php>

Cottonwood Creek - Logan Co.
1910 Warren Trough Truss Bridge
Structure Number: 42N3000E086001
Posted:

Salt Fork of the Arkansas River - Kay Co.
1924 Modified Pratt Through Truss Bridge
Structure Number: 3606 0089X
Posted:

Watch this space for more bargain bridges.

--
Congress is stiffening the law, and the President has said he
will sign it. Now white-collar criminals will not go to jail for
10 years, where earlier they didn't go to jail for only 5 years.

Clarjon1

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 4:47:20 PM12/17/09
to
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:16:53 -0600, mikea wrote:

> Free to good homes; all you have to do is show up, pick one or both up,
> and take them away.
>
> <http://www.odot.org/env-programs/bridges/index.php>
>
> Cottonwood Creek - Logan Co.
> 1910 Warren Trough Truss Bridge
> Structure Number: 42N3000E086001
> Posted:
>
> Salt Fork of the Arkansas River - Kay Co. 1924 Modified Pratt Through
> Truss Bridge Structure Number: 3606 0089X
> Posted:
>
> Watch this space for more bargain bridges.

Seeing as I'm new, could someone please tell me how far gone I am when I
first thought it was going to be a post about networking when I read the
title?

Lionel

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 7:25:26 PM12/17/09
to

I made the same assumption, & had a moment of cognitive dissonance when
I saw the word 'truss' in the descriptions.

--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------

mikea

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 8:21:47 PM12/17/09
to
Lionel <imag...@gmail.com> wrote in <hgei5m$pga$2...@xen1.xcski.com>:

> On 18/12/2009 8:47 AM, Clarjon1 wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:16:53 -0600, mikea wrote:
>>
>>> Free to good homes; all you have to do is show up, pick one or both up,
>>> and take them away.
>>>
>>> <http://www.odot.org/env-programs/bridges/index.php>
>>>
>>> Cottonwood Creek - Logan Co.
>>> 1910 Warren Trough Truss Bridge
>>> Structure Number: 42N3000E086001
>>> Posted:
>>>
>>> Salt Fork of the Arkansas River - Kay Co. 1924 Modified Pratt Through
>>> Truss Bridge Structure Number: 3606 0089X
>>> Posted:
>>>
>>> Watch this space for more bargain bridges.
>>
>> Seeing as I'm new, could someone please tell me how far gone I am when I
>> first thought it was going to be a post about networking when I read the
>> title?
>
> I made the same assumption, & had a moment of cognitive dissonance when
> I saw the word 'truss' in the descriptions.

At least the Old Hands _ought_ to remember that I ork at WeBuildHighways.

These are chunks of highway that we're trying to give away. Another got
taken earlier today and is going to cross a lake in a city park not far
from here. How one transports a bridge is a problem I haven't
investigated.

--
The correct policy approach to a non-problem is to have the courage to do
nothing.
--Christopher Monckton

David Cameron Staples

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 8:47:55 PM12/17/09
to
in Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:21:47 -0600, mikea in hic loco scripsit:

> Lionel <imag...@gmail.com> wrote in <hgei5m$pga$2...@xen1.xcski.com>:
>> I made the same assumption, & had a moment of cognitive dissonance when
>> I saw the word 'truss' in the descriptions.
>
> At least the Old Hands _ought_ to remember that I ork at
> WeBuildHighways.

Yes, but sudden context switch, and all that.

>
> These are chunks of highway that we're trying to give away. Another got
> taken earlier today and is going to cross a lake in a city park not far
> from here. How one transports a bridge is a problem I haven't
> investigated.

ISTR stories of bridges being *stolen*, so presumably _someone_ has
solved that engineering challenge.

--
David Cameron Staples | staples AT unimelb DOT edu DOT au
Melbourne University | School of Engineering | IT Support
how do i decompile a .c in windows? -- bash.org/?650

Curious Gene

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 9:20:12 PM12/17/09
to
David Cameron Staples <sta...@cs.mu.oz.au.spam> wrote:

> ISTR stories of bridges being *stolen*, so presumably _someone_ has
> solved that engineering challenge.

Sargeant Colon was guarding a /different/ bridge that night, I presume.

--
Gene Sullivan :: curio...@gmail.com :: http://curiousgene.com
...programs like Microsoft FrontPage cause me to develop bulging blood
vessels in my forehead and start running around yelling obscenities at
people. -Kibo

Curious Gene

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 10:30:23 PM12/17/09
to
Curious Gene <curio...@gmail.com> wrote:
> David Cameron Staples <sta...@cs.mu.oz.au.spam> wrote:

> > ISTR stories of bridges being *stolen*, so presumably _someone_ has
> > solved that engineering challenge.

> Sargeant Colon was guarding a /different/ bridge that night, I presume.

Oh, for fuck's sake, I can't even spell Sergeant? What's wrong with me?

> Contrary to popular belief, geeks do have sex drives.
Yup. Mine's J:, 5.2 gigs last time I checked.
-Leo Fellman

TimC

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 7:30:14 PM12/17/09
to
On 2009-12-17, mikea (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:

> Free to good homes; all you have to do is show up, pick one or both up,
> and take them away.
>
> <http://www.odot.org/env-programs/bridges/index.php>
>
> Cottonwood Creek - Logan Co.
> 1910 Warren Trough Truss Bridge
> Structure Number: 42N3000E086001
> Posted:
>
> Salt Fork of the Arkansas River - Kay Co.
> 1924 Modified Pratt Through Truss Bridge
> Structure Number: 3606 0089X
> Posted:
>
> Watch this space for more bargain bridges.

Odot need to get in the business of ponies and flying pork.

--
TimC
All science is either physics or stamp collecting.
-- Ernest Rutherford

Peter H. Coffin

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 10:55:02 PM12/17/09
to
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:21:47 -0600, mikea wrote:

> These are chunks of highway that we're trying to give away. Another
> got taken earlier today and is going to cross a lake in a city park
> not far from here. How one transports a bridge is a problem I haven't
> investigated.

I'da thunk you'd be reveling in the opportunity to rest on "Not My
Problem".

--
For every subject you can think of there are at least 3 web sites.
The owners of these web sites know each other and at least one of
them hates at least one of the others.
-- mnlooney's view of Skif's Internet Theorem

Jim

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 1:52:05 AM12/18/09
to
David Cameron Staples <sta...@cs.mu.oz.au.SPAM> wrote:

> >> I made the same assumption, & had a moment of cognitive dissonance when
> >> I saw the word 'truss' in the descriptions.
> >
> > At least the Old Hands _ought_ to remember that I ork at
> > WeBuildHighways.
>
> Yes, but sudden context switch, and all that.

Now you're bringing switches into it! Aaaaargh!

Jim
--
http://www.ursaMinorBeta.co.uk http://twitter.com/GreyAreaUK

mikea

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 7:07:16 AM12/18/09
to
TimC <tcon...@no.spam.accepted.here-astro.swin.edu.au> wrote in <126109618...@hexane.ssi.swin.edu.au>:

> On 2009-12-17, mikea (aka Bruce)
> was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
>> Free to good homes; all you have to do is show up, pick one or both up,
>> and take them away.
>>
>> <http://www.odot.org/env-programs/bridges/index.php>
>>
>> Cottonwood Creek - Logan Co.
>> 1910 Warren Trough Truss Bridge
>> Structure Number: 42N3000E086001
>> Posted:
>>
>> Salt Fork of the Arkansas River - Kay Co.
>> 1924 Modified Pratt Through Truss Bridge
>> Structure Number: 3606 0089X
>> Posted:
>>
>> Watch this space for more bargain bridges.
>
> Odot need to get in the business of ponies and flying pork.

Been there for _years_. Remember, it's a gummint agency. We do flying
pork, jam yesterday and jam tomorrow, and ponies at the world-class
level. Our Director had to testify before the Senate Transportation
Committee earlier this month; you can't get much more ponies-and-pork
than that, can you?

--
`Bother,' said Pooh, `Eeyore, ready two photon torpedoes and lock
phasers on the Heffalump; Piglet, meet me in transporter room three.'
--Robert Billing

Shmuel Metz

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 10:01:00 AM12/18/09
to
In <hge8t8$hf3$6...@news.eternal-september.org>, on 12/17/2009
at 09:47 PM, Clarjon1 <clar...@NOSPAM.gmail.NOSPAMFOOBWAHAHAHA.com>
said:

>Seeing as I'm new, could someone please tell me how far gone I am when I
>first thought it was going to be a post about networking when I read the
>title?

Keep your mind out of my gutter! Just because he works where the wubber
hits the woad doesn't[1] mean that some of us aren't sick enough to think
of notworks first.

[1] If you haven't read them you should.

--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> ISO position
Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+bspfh to contact me.
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)

mikea

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 12:24:59 PM12/18/09
to
Peter H. Coffin <hel...@ninehells.com> wrote in <slrnhilthq....@abyss.ninehells.com>:

> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:21:47 -0600, mikea wrote:
>
>> These are chunks of highway that we're trying to give away. Another
>> got taken earlier today and is going to cross a lake in a city park
>> not far from here. How one transports a bridge is a problem I haven't
>> investigated.
>
> I'da thunk you'd be reveling in the opportunity to rest on "Not My
> Problem".

Au contraire, mon frere. I expect the HellDesk to call me up and tell me
that someone, somewhere in the state, is having trouble relocating a
bridge and my help is urgently required.

--
I am starting to be convinced that the upper bound on the number of possible
zombies is equal to the number of systems running Windows, *maybe* less those
which are forcibly locked down and run by anal-retentive and highly-clueful
well-motivated maniacs. And I'm not sure about those. -- Rich Kulawiec

Message has been deleted

mikea

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 1:03:27 PM12/18/09
to
Roger Burton West <roger+a...@nospam.firedrake.org> wrote in <20091218174001....@firedrake.org>:

> mikea wrote:
>
>>Au contraire, mon frere. I expect the HellDesk to call me up and tell me
>>that someone, somewhere in the state, is having trouble relocating a
>>bridge and my help is urgently required.
>
> Not to mention problems using it in its new home. ("Well, it doesn't
> _say_ that you can't use it unsupported at one end.")

Which the HellDesk, in its message to me, will report as "Bridge not
connecting" or some equally transparent and obvious expression.

--
Want an abuse desk to be part of the solution? Dip it in acid.

Zebee Johnstone

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 3:09:39 PM12/18/09
to
In alt.sysadmin.recovery on Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:24:59 -0600

mikea <mi...@mikea.ath.cx> wrote:
> Peter H. Coffin <hel...@ninehells.com> wrote in <slrnhilthq....@abyss.ninehells.com>:
>>
>> I'da thunk you'd be reveling in the opportunity to rest on "Not My
>> Problem".
>
> Au contraire, mon frere. I expect the HellDesk to call me up and tell me
> that someone, somewhere in the state, is having trouble relocating a
> bridge and my help is urgently required.

Because they tried to email it?


Zebee

mikea

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 3:28:40 PM12/18/09
to
Zebee Johnstone <zeb...@gmail.com> wrote in <slrnhinoc3...@gmail.com>:

More like "Someone called us with a problem. Mike solves problems, and
this is a problem. Let's call Mike." You know, the "We must do
something; this is something; we must therefore do this" dance.

The sigmonster is reminiscing, it appears.

--
OTOH, we are talking about the Feds, and they're run by the present
administration, and saying that they're "laissez faire" is much like
describing Attila the Hun as "having some minor interest in land
acquisition and motivational research." -- me, optimist

Brian Kantor

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 7:00:34 PM12/18/09
to
mikea <mi...@mikea.ath.cx> wrote:
>How one transports a bridge is a problem I haven't
>investigated.

There might be some interesting stories surrounding a
certain bridge now located in, I think, Arizona.
- Brian

Steve VanDevender

unread,
Dec 18, 2009, 10:40:52 PM12/18/09
to
TimC <tcon...@no.spam.accepted.here-astro.swin.edu.au> writes:

> Odot need to get in the business of ponies and flying pork.

The Oregon Department of Transportation (well, then the Oregon Highway
Division) is infamous for once creating flying blubber.

--
Steve VanDevender "I ride the big iron" http://hexadecimal.uoregon.edu/
ste...@hexadecimal.uoregon.edu PGP keyprint 4AD7AF61F0B9DE87 522902969C0A7EE8
Little things break, circuitry burns / Time flies while my little world turns
Every day comes, every day goes / 100 years and nobody shows -- Happy Rhodes

Mike Causer

unread,
Dec 19, 2009, 8:19:31 AM12/19/09
to
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 11:16:53 -0600
mikea <mi...@mikea.ath.cx> wrote:

> Free to good homes; all you have to do is show up, pick one or both up,
> and take them away.
>
> <http://www.odot.org/env-programs/bridges/index.php>

86ft and 415ft, damn. Got any at about 105ft (33m) coming up? I need
two. Oh, and the loan of an AN-124 to get them across the pond.


Mike
--
Flood the fen again! - Wicken Fen enlargement
http://www.wicken.org.uk/vision.htm

Message has been deleted

Mike Causer

unread,
Dec 19, 2009, 9:44:14 AM12/19/09
to
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:29:14 +0000 (UTC)
Roger Burton West <roger+a...@nospam.firedrake.org> wrote:

> Mike Causer wrote:
>
> >86ft and 415ft, damn. Got any at about 105ft (33m) coming up? I need
> >two.
>

> The 415-footer is in four 96-foot lengths (plus interstitial bits)...

Not long enough. The banks of the waterways are so weak we can't put
anything on them, and the whole structure has to be supported from
clear outside them. So 105ft to 120ft is what we need.


> >Oh, and the loan of an AN-124 to get them across the pond.
>

> Let the cloud do it. "Hey, Bob, going to England? Take this small girder
> with you..."

"R.A.F." Mildenhall is conveniently nearby it's true, but we'd have to
throw the girders over the back fence. There may be trouble at the
front gate.

Bernard Peek

unread,
Dec 19, 2009, 11:01:33 AM12/19/09
to
On 19/12/09 13:29, Roger Burton West wrote:

>
> Let the cloud do it. "Hey, Bob, going to England? Take this small girder
> with you..."
>

And did you pack your own luggage sir?

--
Bernard Peek

David Gersic

unread,
Dec 19, 2009, 1:43:02 PM12/19/09
to
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:44:14 +0000, Mike Causer <m.r.c...@goglemail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:29:14 +0000 (UTC)
> Roger Burton West <roger+a...@nospam.firedrake.org> wrote:
>
>> Mike Causer wrote:
>>
>> >86ft and 415ft, damn. Got any at about 105ft (33m) coming up? I need
>> >two.
>>
>> The 415-footer is in four 96-foot lengths (plus interstitial bits)...
>
> Not long enough. The banks of the waterways are so weak we can't put
> anything on them, and the whole structure has to be supported from
> clear outside them. So 105ft to 120ft is what we need.

The 415' bridge would work. It'd be a little over-long, perhaps, but
it would mount well outside the banks.


Mike Causer

unread,
Dec 19, 2009, 2:46:55 PM12/19/09
to

Fit THAT in your X-ray machine TSA! It's not on your prohibited list.

Mike
--
Mike Causer

SteveD

unread,
Dec 19, 2009, 4:49:05 PM12/19/09
to
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 19:46:55 +0000, Mike Causer <m.r.c...@goglemail.com>
wrote:

>On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 16:01:33 +0000

But the extra mass charges - oy!

Mike Causer

unread,
Dec 19, 2009, 8:10:37 PM12/19/09
to
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 21:47:20 +0000 (UTC)
Clarjon1 <clar...@NOSPAM.gmail.NOSPAMFOOBWAHAHAHA.com> wrote:

> Seeing as I'm new, could someone please tell me how far gone I am when I
> first thought it was going to be a post about networking when I read the
> title?

Good Sir, ignore purveyors of cheap modern electronica. Available for
your examination is a Real Steel bridge. Thanks to the development of
tele-transportation, the Brooklyn Bridge has been declared Surplus To
Requirements by the Relevant Authorities, who have exclusively
commissioned My Organisation to find a new placement. Where it may
continue its recognized Revenue Generating capabilities for a new owner.

Should this fine edifice, and its Revenue Generating possibilities, fit
your portfolio, please contact me at +44 778 949 6755.

International movement of bridges is no problem.

I await your favourable call.


Mike
--
Mike Causer

John F. Eldredge

unread,
Dec 19, 2009, 8:16:00 PM12/19/09
to

Are you sure you don't mean +234 (Nigeria), instead of +44 (the UK)?

--
John F. Eldredge -- jo...@jfeldredge.com
"Reserve your right to think, for even to think wrongly is better
than not to think at all." -- Hypatia of Alexandria

David Cameron Staples

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 3:09:29 AM12/20/09
to
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:29:14 +0000, Roger Burton West wrote:

> Mike Causer wrote:
>
>>86ft and 415ft, damn. Got any at about 105ft (33m) coming up? I need
>>two.
>

> The 415-footer is in four 96-foot lengths (plus interstitial bits)...
>

"Ah, but there's a snag, you see. Due to bad planning, the hundred and
twenty-two thousand miles is in three inch lengths. So it's not very
useful."

Peter Corlett

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 8:14:33 AM12/20/09
to
John F. Eldredge <jo...@jfeldredge.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 01:10:37 +0000, Mike Causer wrote:
[...]

>> Should this fine edifice, and its Revenue Generating possibilities, fit
>> your portfolio, please contact me at +44 778 949 6755.
[...]

> Are you sure you don't mean +234 (Nigeria), instead of +44 (the UK)?

Scammers are quite fond of +44 70xx anonymous call redirection services too,
because they look sort of like mobile phone numbers and some can redirect
across much of the globe.

Shmuel Metz

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 9:38:51 AM12/20/09
to
In <1jawqsj.syclnk1srg8oyN%j...@magrathea.plus.com>, on 12/18/2009

at 06:52 AM, j...@magrathea.plus.com (Jim) said:

>David Cameron Staples <sta...@cs.mu.oz.au.SPAM> wrote:

>> >> I made the same assumption, & had a moment of cognitive dissonance when
>> >> I saw the word 'truss' in the descriptions.
>> >
>> > At least the Old Hands _ought_ to remember that I ork at
>> > WeBuildHighways.
>>
>> Yes, but sudden context switch, and all that.

>Now you're bringing switches into it!

Hey, watch that S&M stuff! BTW, was the truss for B&D?

Jim

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 10:38:57 AM12/20/09
to
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <spam...@library.lspace.org.invalid> wrote:

> >> Yes, but sudden context switch, and all that.
>
> >Now you're bringing switches into it!
>
> Hey, watch that S&M stuff! BTW, was the truss for B&D?

Why are you asking me? I know nothing about anything kinky. I've told
you before, I have _no_ idea how that Judge got into my airing cupboard.

Jim
--
"How much of a waste of time is this, on a scale of 'making your
own crisps' to 'the Millenium Dome'?" Jack Parlabane, "Be My Enemy"

http://www.UrsaMinorBeta.co.uk http://twitter.com/GreyAreaUK

Lionel

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 7:22:00 PM12/20/09
to

Ah, so you've diversified into the bridge business, Mr Simpson?

--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------

David Cameron Staples

unread,
Dec 20, 2009, 8:29:31 PM12/20/09
to
in Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:22:00 +1100, Lionel in hic loco scripsit:

> On 20/12/2009 7:09 PM, David Cameron Staples wrote:
>> On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:29:14 +0000, Roger Burton West wrote:
>>
>>> Mike Causer wrote:
>>>
>>>> 86ft and 415ft, damn. Got any at about 105ft (33m) coming up? I
>>>> need two.
>>>
>>> The 415-footer is in four 96-foot lengths (plus interstitial bits)...
>>>
>>>
>> "Ah, but there's a snag, you see. Due to bad planning, the hundred and
>> twenty-two thousand miles is in three inch lengths. So it's not very
>> useful."
>
> Ah, so you've diversified into the bridge business, Mr Simpson?

Simpson's individual bridgettes! A million household uses!

--
David Cameron Staples | staples AT unimelb DOT edu DOT au
Melbourne University | School of Engineering | IT Support
i got kicked out of barnes and noble once for moving all the bibles into
the fiction section -- bash.org/?406373

Brian Kantor

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 12:49:34 PM12/22/09
to
>> Sargeant Colon was guarding a /different/ bridge that night, I presume.

...and your host Doctor Jerome Hathaway:

"Hi, I'm Jerry Hathaway with Everything. Tonight we examine the colon."

- Brian

Message has been deleted

Lionel

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 4:24:35 PM12/23/09
to
On 21/12/2009 12:29 PM, David Cameron Staples wrote:
> in Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:22:00 +1100, Lionel in hic loco scripsit:
>
>> On 20/12/2009 7:09 PM, David Cameron Staples wrote:
>>> On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:29:14 +0000, Roger Burton West wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mike Causer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> 86ft and 415ft, damn. Got any at about 105ft (33m) coming up? I
>>>>> need two.
>>>>
>>>> The 415-footer is in four 96-foot lengths (plus interstitial bits)...
>>>>
>>>>
>>> "Ah, but there's a snag, you see. Due to bad planning, the hundred and
>>> twenty-two thousand miles is in three inch lengths. So it's not very
>>> useful."
>>
>> Ah, so you've diversified into the bridge business, Mr Simpson?
>
> Simpson's individual bridgettes! A million household uses!

But are they waterproof?

Lawns 'R' Us

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 5:08:04 PM12/23/09
to
On 2009-12-23, Lionel <imag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21/12/2009 12:29 PM, David Cameron Staples wrote:
>> in Mon, 21 Dec 2009 11:22:00 +1100, Lionel in hic loco scripsit:
>>> On 20/12/2009 7:09 PM, David Cameron Staples wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:29:14 +0000, Roger Burton West wrote:
>>>>> Mike Causer wrote:
>>>>>> 86ft and 415ft, damn. Got any at about 105ft (33m) coming up? I
>>>>>> need two.
>>>>>
>>>>> The 415-footer is in four 96-foot lengths (plus interstitial bits)...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> "Ah, but there's a snag, you see. Due to bad planning, the hundred and
>>>> twenty-two thousand miles is in three inch lengths. So it's not very
>>>> useful."
>>>
>>> Ah, so you've diversified into the bridge business, Mr Simpson?
>>
>> Simpson's individual bridgettes! A million household uses!
>
> But are they waterproof?

Absorb water today with Simpson's individual water absorb-a-tex
bridgettes! Away with floods! Away with the dull drudgery of workaday
tidal waves! Use Simpson's Individual Flood Preventers!

0 new messages