BUSY!!!
DEWME
short hairs (so to speak)! I haven't even been reading the
(other) group for some time. Oh well gotta go!
***************************************************************************
*dEwMe<------(((sd...@charlie.usd.edu*******#The University of South Dakota*
*************or sd...@nyx.cs.du.edu*********#has no opinions I hold valid***
Yet another RAVEing lunatic!!!*************#so why would I speak for them?*
***************************************************************************
Wilf Leblanc
>Sorry I've been missing lately but schools got me by the
>short hairs (so to speak)! I haven't even been reading the
>(other) group for some time. Oh well gotta go!
What other group ?
Oh, do you mean alt.nuke.the.usa ?
-
bq
Wilf Leblanc
>whats this (other) group?
You tell me ? I think he was refering to alt.nuke.the.usa. Some of
us hang out there from time to time.
>i would say more, but i have lost my preferred interface and despise
>posting within this format (not that others can likely tell the difference,
>but i most certainly can). i will be watching, more like lurking for the
>time being i fear. but, my linguistics is lacking here, what defines
>syntax and what makes its tactical application more vital than the tactics
>of semanitcs?
Well, semantics is more the actual meaning, whereas syntax is more how
the words are assembled. Now, if you're asking how to phrase yourself
in order to get a tactical advantage, then stick around.
You had better not be related to Patrick Swazey (spelling ?) If so,
don't even bother lurking !
-
bq
Kirsten Lea Swazey
whats this (other) group?
posting within this format (not that others can likely tell the difference,
but i most certainly can). i will be watching, more like lurking for the
time being i fear. but, my linguistics is lacking here, what defines
syntax and what makes its tactical application more vital than the tactics
of semanitcs?
LEFTY OF NUTICUS
That is great, what a wonder to meet someone that has noticed that
a Mule says Haw-Hee instead of Hee-Haw. I wonder why or who ever started
that falshood.
No Rob I don't think there is any way to ever make a mule give that
cool sound. When you were at your girlfriends house did you notice how he
sucked in so much air you thought he would explode? Wow isn't that great.
HEY and when he blows it all out and starts to inhale again he can't do it
as fast as he wants it is like a HAW-HE-HE-HE-HE-HE.
I wonder why a mule so
so God Damn stubborn also, whenever my mom would try to put the harness he
would lift his head and lift her with it, but if a man tries it he will let
ya? Hmmm? I bet it was a girl that started the lie about what a mule says so
all mules when they are born are told never let a girl do anything to ya.
yup, that has to be it.
HAW-HE-HE-HE
A mule is also so cool because he is bigger than a horse and stronger. They
have a cool sound and have really neat ears.
Speaking of ears, One day when I got all messed up with a couple of my
friends and pierced Floid the mules ear. We took a electric razor and shaved
the inside of it, then we stuck a needle through it and added my moms
earing. It was real fun untill she went looking for it and I had to tell her
where it was.
Haw-Hee-he-he-he
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kirsten Lea Swazey
horrors! patrick, kin to me?! please, hold on one moment while i retch
... alright, better. no, the attractive-yet-vapid pat is of no relation to
me whatsoever.
as to alt.nuke.the.usa, i was watching that group for a week or so, but it
failed to amuse or entertain me, so i got rid of it. are there any
interesting threads going there?
i am still beating my head against my system here ... if any kind computer
geeks know anyhing useful about the berkely csh i would really appreciate
some help. sorry to post this here, but i am being traumatized by rn.
xtc
David ;o
Didn't you read the faq??? Sometimes I think women should just be
banned from the net, or confined to the alt.sex.* or rec.cooking
hierarchy.
Wilf Leblanc
>Didn't you read the faq??? Sometimes I think women should just be
>banned from the net, or confined to the alt.sex.* or rec.cooking
>hierarchy.
Did you ?
First and foremost, alt dot syntax dot tactical is an outward, not
inward looking collaboration of individuals.
Your aggression is admirable, but please channel it in an outwardly
syntactically tactical fashion.
-
bq
David ;o
>jpd...@netcom.com (David ;o) writes:
>
>>Didn't you read the faq??? Sometimes I think women should just be
>>banned from the net, or confined to the alt.sex.* or rec.cooking
>>hierarchy.
>
>Did you ?
i AM the faq!
>First and foremost, alt dot syntax dot tactical is an outward, not
>inward looking collaboration of individuals.
Bah. Everything is outward.
>Your aggression is admirable, but please channel it in an outwardly
>syntactically tactical fashion.
Don't let your hormones cloud your judgement: a target = a target.
Like Sgt. John Tracy, who called a napalm strike on his own position,
just to spite his snoring Lt.; we to must realize only the end is
important, and that in itself justifies any means conceivable.
Unknown
>
>i AM the faq!
>
>>First and foremost, alt dot syntax dot tactical is an outward, not
>>inward looking collaboration of individuals.
>
>Bah. Everything is outward.
>
>>Your aggression is admirable, but please channel it in an outwardly
>>syntactically tactical fashion.
>
>Don't let your hormones cloud your judgement: a target = a target.
>Like Sgt. John Tracy, who called a napalm strike on his own position,
>just to spite his snoring Lt.; we to must realize only the end is
>important, and that in itself justifies any means conceivable.
>
>
>
standards too far in your concern with acheiving your ends, you run the risk
of becoming as loathesome as the original target. Your syntax and sharpness
become sloppy, and you cease to be effective. Did the snoring Lt., or Sgt.
John Tracy, become a more effective soldier for being napalmed? Take and
hold the syntactical high ground. I think Sun Tzu meant to say that.
>>Your aggression is admirable, but please channel it in an outwardly
>>syntactically tactical fashion.
Ditto
St. Bob
Wilf Leblanc
[...]
>Don't let your hormones cloud your judgement: a target = a target.
I won't, now _you_ don't let your left brain attack your right:
internal target != external target
>Like Sgt. John Tracy, who called a napalm strike on his own position,
>just to spite his snoring Lt.; we to must realize only the end is
>important, and that in itself justifies any means conceivable.
Why don't you do us all a favor then and have your ego napalm its
own position just to spite your id.
-
bq
David ;o
>(deletion happens)
>>
>Yeah, right! Whatever you say Lenin, old boy. If you lower your syntactical
>standards too far in your concern with acheiving your ends, you run the risk
>of becoming as loathesome as the original target. Your syntax and sharpness
>become sloppy, and you cease to be effective. Did the snoring Lt., or Sgt.
>John Tracy, become a more effective soldier for being napalmed? Take and
>hold the syntactical high ground. I think Sun Tzu meant to say that.
There is no risk because I fully acknowledge my present state is
already more loathsome than any potential target. I have nothing to
lose, therefore total genocide is perfectly acceptable, if not
desireable.
Sgt. Tracy walked away with a field promotion to Lt., and got a brand
spanking new uniform, with his old charred pants shipped to display at
the War College. Was he more effective for his country? who cares? he
made personal gains, and that's what counts.
Wilf Leblanc
[...]
>There is no risk because I fully acknowledge my present state is
>already more loathsome than any potential target. I have nothing to
>lose, therefore total genocide is perfectly acceptable, if not
>desireable.
>Sgt. Tracy walked away with a field promotion to Lt., and got a brand
>spanking new uniform, with his old charred pants shipped to display at
>the War College. Was he more effective for his country? who cares? he
>made personal gains, and that's what counts.
I hesitate to attack within the group, but this is AST and we
are arguing about AST policy here.
The fact that you have nothing to lose, is not to be confused with
what the group as a whole has to lose. Would it be better to lose
one rogue element, or to lose the war,... hmmmmmmm.
The fact that your life is so pitiful, that you would choose genocide,
(just like your hero) is a sad commentary on your life ...
..... .......
.
.
hey, do I have a group for you, try this:
% grep '^a' ~/.newsrc | grep 'de\.h'
and then go there.
-
bq
David ;o
wi...@sce.carleton.ca (Wilf Leblanc) writes:
>jpd...@netcom.com (David ;o) writes:
>
>[...]
>>Don't let your hormones cloud your judgement: a target = a target.
>
>I won't, now _you_ don't let your left brain attack your right:
>
> internal target != external target
Bullshit. If it is inflammible, it should burn.
Furthermore, you had better rethink internal target. Even by your view,
you should realize that just because something is internal, doesn't
mean it is native, or worthwhile.
>Why don't you do us all a favor then and have your ego napalm its
>own position just to spite your id.
or I could just napalm your posts. Luckily, My ego isn't on the net.
Can't say the same for everyone else.