Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Wholeflaffer clones invade West Coast

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Mark Shippey

unread,
Feb 20, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/20/99
to
Brandon J. Freels (Fre...@ethergate.com) wrote:
: Are you, in a hidden, subliminal way, trying to get me to define Surrealism?
: Surrealism is the demand to further reality, to push reality past the reign
: of logic, in hopes of reaching the purist of thoughts. Surrealism is freedom
: from society's artificial obligations, emancipating the mind and its ability
: to unify contradictions. Surrealism is giving in to the imagination, and
: accepting perception as existing in both closed and opened eyes. Surrealism
: is accepting your fantasies and desires, your impulsive and irrational
: actions, and all the things that would have you labeled mad. Surrealism is
: the movement of the mind towards a clearer understanding of life. Surrealism
: is "the pruning of life" (Boiffard, Eluard, Vitrac).
:
: It is also the pursuit of the Marvelous, and the experience of Convulsive
: Beauty.
:
: It appears you have misunderstood what Surrealism is due to watching to much
: MTV. Hopefully this will help you out a little, and may I suggest the
: Surrealist Manifestoes of Breton, and his books Nadja and Mad Love. Possibly
: you should even read Nadeau's History of Surrealism. You apparently are the
: type of individual who believes Surrealism equals something "weird." I have
: no more patience for fucks like you.

So, how does this relate to the pompous and arrogant Fundamentalist
Surrealism that attempts to decide what is appropriate and acceptable
for a post in alt.surrealism (Official Home of the Fundamentalist
Surrealists). You write many fancy words, but in reality your newsgroup
is the surrealist equal to Jerry Falwell's church. This may be hard
for you to accept, believing as you do that you are part of some
superior philosopy of life. Tough break. You and your newsgroup
are the essense of mundane.

Leo Sgouros

unread,
Feb 20, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/20/99
to
OH I LOVE IT WHEN YOU GO

Leo Sgouros

unread,
Feb 20, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/20/99
to

Leo Sgouros wrote in message ...
BECAUSE EVERY TIME I TRY TO TALK ABOUT THE KEMMEDY ASSINATION YOU SCREAM
TWITIUM DEVICE BINKY LOVE

Mark Shippey

unread,
Feb 20, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/20/99
to
Leo Sgouros (lsgo...@tampabay.rr.com) wrote:
: OH I LOVE IT WHEN YOU GO

OH HOW SURREAL. THIS IS WAY COOL SURREALISM. THIS IS THE
WAY SURREALISM SHOULD BE... DUMB STAND-UP COMIC ONE LINERS.


: , how does this relate to the pompous and arrogant Fundamentalist

:
:

Leo Sgouros

unread,
Feb 20, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/20/99
to

Mark Shippey wrote in message <7alju3$p09$3...@fnord.nationwide.net>...

>Leo Sgouros (lsgo...@tampabay.rr.com) wrote:
>: OH I LOVE IT WHEN YOU GO
>
> OH HOW SURREAL. THIS IS WAY COOL SURREALISM. THIS IS THE
>WAY SURREALISM SHOULD BE... DUMB STAND-UP COMIC ONE LINERS.


YA AS GOOD AS THE PHD DISCOURSE BELOW

Leo Sgouros

unread,
Feb 20, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/20/99
to
ME SO HOMEY MEEOW YOU LONG TIME

Leo Sgouros

unread,
Feb 20, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/20/99
to

>
>
>, how does this relate to the pompous and arrogant Fundamentalist

ALL YOUR FEARS EXPOSED ABOVE


>>Surrealism that attempts to decide what is appropriate and acceptable
>>for a post in alt.surrealism (Official Home of the Fundamentalist

THEN YOUR TEARS

>>Surrealists). You write many fancy words, but in reality your newsgroup
>>is the surrealist equal to Jerry Falwell's church.


THEN YOUR ENVY

This may be hard
>>for you to accept, believing as you do that you are part of some
>>superior philosopy of life. Tough break. You and your newsgroup
>>are the essense of mundane.
>
>

THEN YOUR DESCENT INTO LITHIUM

Brandon J. Freels

unread,
Feb 20, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/20/99
to

Mark Shippey wrote

>You and your newsgroup
>are the essense of mundane.

Brandon:
Well, I guess that means there is no place for you and your bullshit.

0 new messages