Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Unsurreal surrealists

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Brandon J. Freels

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to

Clark_Kent wrote
> After reading the posts in this newsgroup [blah, blah, blah...]

Brandon:
Bataille said the same thing about the original Surrealists, but that didn't
make them any less surreal.

Clark_Kent

unread,
Feb 27, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/27/99
to
After reading the posts in this newsgroup, it is clear
that this place really is the Usenet home of stale, traditional,
conformist, psuedo-intellectual, know-it-all unsurreal surrealists
who have created a religion out of surrealism. This really is
the Usenet Church of Fundamentalist Surrealism, the place where
surrealism is now a shrine for conformist believers to worship
in.
BWHAHAHAHA!
--
Posted via Talkway - http://www.talkway.com
Surf Usenet at home, on the road, and by email -- always at Talkway.


Leo Sgouros

unread,
Feb 27, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/27/99
to

Clark_Kent wrote in message ...


Binkey see, Binkey spew.
woohoo.
Glad to seee you are keeping your bwahas to the legal minimum.


Perceptor

unread,
Feb 27, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/27/99
to
Clark_Kent wrote:

> After reading the posts in this newsgroup, it is clear
> that this place really is the Usenet home of stale, traditional,
> conformist, psuedo-intellectual, know-it-all unsurreal surrealists
> who have created a religion out of surrealism. This really is
> the Usenet Church of Fundamentalist Surrealism, the place where
> surrealism is now a shrine for conformist believers to worship
> in.
> BWHAHAHAHA!
> --
> Posted via Talkway - http://www.talkway.com
> Surf Usenet at home, on the road, and by email -- always at Talkway.

To the person calling themself "Clark Kent"
If that's all you can get out of this place than so be it,
It is true that this is the home of several individuals to whom
Traditional Surrealism is a very serious thing, and some of them even
take it to the point of worship.
There are also "idiots" who post here and if not to amuse then waste
peoples time.
There are those who even defy description.
The point is , in my humble opinion, All who choose to post here are
welcome, and what ever it is they have to add to our group regardless of
perceived value, has a place here and belongs here.
As to it's relevance to surrealism is not the right of any one or two
people to decide that. If they do then they should create their own
group and moderate it.
This is one of the few places left on usenet where I can say any fucking
thing I want to, and I feel it is a precious thing to have
I admire surrealism but don't label myself as a surrealist
I choose to post all manner of things here. I try to make them revelant
to art or surrealism if I can but most of all try to make them
stimulating or at least interesting to the people who read the posts
here.
I invite you to try posting other subject matter as well as simple
criticism of the group as a whole . If you can't be creative enough to
do that then at least try to make your criticism a little more detailed
and specific so as to stimulate honest debate and discourse.
I look forward to you future posts. I have the use of one eye and a can
type this with one finger, so maybe I can answer you when you write.

don...................


Kay Kane

unread,
Feb 27, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/27/99
to

Perceptor wrote in message <36D79819...@optonline.net>...


Hi Don,
Just started reading posts here recently. Am a painter who admires
Surrealism, thought I was "neo-expressionist", reviewed as "surrealist" and
was delighted to find this group! Your post caught my interest because,
while I am looking with 2 eyes, I am typing w/one finger (burned my left
hand very badly last week). Heal quickly and I will be reading more than
posting for a while. Looks like a good group, overall.
Kay Kane

barrett john erickson

unread,
Feb 27, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/27/99
to

Clark_Kent wrote in message ...
> After reading the posts in this newsgroup, it is clear
>that this place really is the Usenet home of stale, traditional,
>conformist, psuedo-intellectual, know-it-all unsurreal surrealists
>who have created a religion out of surrealism. This really is
>the Usenet Church of Fundamentalist Surrealism, the place where
>surrealism is now a shrine for conformist believers to worship
>in.
>

not that i want to prolong your flattening presence or provoke another witty
"BWHAHAHAHA!", but before you call someone else a "stale, traditional,
conformist" i think you need to explain your relationship to "scouting".


-- barrett

bar...@MagneticFields.org
http://www.MagneticFields.org/

"Everything tends to make us believe that there exists a certain point of
the mind at which life and death, the real and the imagined, past and
future, the communicable and the incommunicable, high and low, cease to be
perceived as contradictions."

...André Breton

0 new messages