email address
BOB EZERGAILIS
I can in future be contacted at: morp...@bserv.com
The address bob.eze...@ghbbs.com will no longer be in service.
It might or might not be possible to post something in rec.arts.poems
and alt.surrealism in the near future. I will have to see if there is
another potential means of access to those conferences. Posting to
other networks will no longer be possible, as they are only carried by
ghbbs, and are not carried at bserv.
Thankyou, and regards,
Bob Ezergailis
---
ž SLMR 2.1a ž bob.eze...@ghbbs.com
PK
> It might or might not be possible to post something in rec.arts.poems
> and alt.surrealism in the near future.
What you need is a mail-to-news gateway -- you email a
message to it, and it posts it to the right newsgroup.
#Paul, who went to a see an 'aspects of surrealism in britain'
exhibition yesterday, but cant be bothered to post a review,
as no-one seemed to notice his last one.
barrett john erickson
PK <nob...@bloch.leeds.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:3764EA6E...@bloch.leeds.ac.uk...
> [...]
> #Paul, who went to a see an 'aspects of surrealism in britain'
> exhibition yesterday, but cant be bothered to post a review,
> as no-one seemed to notice his last one.
on the contrary. the review was read and appreciated as a small island of
substance in the tepid pit of bullshit alt.surr has become since its
colonization by the reactionary emptiness of posts originating in
rec.arts.prose, alt.slack or alt.non.sequitur. don't mistake lack of
comment for lack of appreciation. sometimes there just isn't anything to
add when one is unable to see the work in question.
please comment on this one as well.
as i remember, the surrealist group in Leeds commented even more critically
on the "Time Exposed..." exhibition in their publication MANTICORE (i don't
know if you've seen this). if i'd had it in hand at the time, i would've
posted their dismissal also. wasn't there an exhibition of work by Conroy
Maddox going on at the same time? did you see this (or is this
"Aspects...")?
-- barrett
el...@concentric.net
said exhibit.
"barrett john erickson" <bar...@magneticfields.org> wrote:
>
> PK <nob...@bloch.leeds.ac.uk> wrote
> > [...]
>
> > #Paul, who went to a see an 'aspects of surrealism in britain'
> > exhibition yesterday, but cant be bothered to post a review,
> > as no-one seemed to notice his last one.
>
> on the contrary. the review was read and appreciated as a small
island of
> substance in the tepid pit of bullshit alt.surr has become since its
> colonization by the reactionary emptiness of posts originating in
> rec.arts.prose, alt.slack or alt.non.sequitur. don't mistake lack of
> comment for lack of appreciation. sometimes there just isn't anything
to
> add when one is unable to see the work in question.
>
> please comment on this one as well.
(...)
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Dale Houstman
barrett,
You're no Robert Maughan. He makes my nose tickle. Anyway though
"revolution may not be a dinner party," Robert is a dish and you're just
the Tums!
1. Lemon chicken ala stomach flu
2. Half-Baked Ataxia
3. Pomme de Tepid
4. Robot Monkey
4. Callow Fluke with Blowpipe Pretensions
4. A Dummy in Aspic
3. Assworm Sandwiches
The party's over. It's time to call it a night. "Maughan; not delivery,
DeJoko"
What are you doing, speaking of surrealism on the surrealism ng? It's
the prose ng's Menudo pile, a place for R.M. to have a B.M. when he
can't get his "security diapers" pinned on in time. Robert Maughan:
absolute proof that having grandchildren does something to your brain
that can't be cured by having a History Degree.
Strong R.M.? R.M. in R.M. down the path of least regurgiance? R.M.'s
harem: a screeching rat hole?
R.M.
1. Rancid Money
2. Robber's Mullet
3. Rankest Mormon
4. Ruffled Melanoma
5. Rectumless Madonna
We must arm against R.M.! He's a footnote to a foot soldier, and an
asterisk to a star. An endnode.
DMH
PK
> I second barrett's notion. Please write something interesting about
> said exhibit.
Damn, now I'll have to write something, I'll try to
find some time....
#Paul
Dale Houstman
Andrea Chen wrote:
>
> > I second barrett's notion. Please write something interesting about
> > said exhibit.
>
> This is silly. The people in alt.surrealism have no interest in
> discussion. If it can't generate flames then Barrett/Dale/Brandon will
> not respond. This *is* the reason why this group is completely unable
> to develop into a funtional community.
Aren't you having any funt Andrea? Since I barely post here anymore
(because your rotting carcass has attracted so many goreflies to the
rails), and barrett has taken off also, to accuse us of having an agenda
here against discussion is silly, but somehow typical. The truth is, the
surrealists (not these cadaver hounds you seem to attract then leave
like wayward children to pick their noses in a dark room) ARE having
discussions of varying natures right now, only somewhere else where
little muckminds like you can't ruin the pleasure.
As for the rest of your post; it is antiquated nonsense. As I said, for
all intents and purposes, Barrett and I have left the group. So why
hasn't this great spontaneous outpouring of discussion occurred? Why do
the posts mainly concern mindless non sequitors and winding threads of
puerile nonsense? Because these are YOUR children Andrea. Don't forget
to nourish them with your falcon teats.
As for Robert Maughan, he never attempted to have any sort of
discussion, and has shown again and again quite an ability to stick his
head up his ass all by himself. He has posted several "thoughts" so
embarrassing in their aggressive error that any other man would have
placed himself in his own killfile to avoid reading anything from
himself. Instead (because your offspring have learned to have no shame
when it comes to half-thought and broken communication) he goes on
thinking that somehow his credibility has been enhanced by attacking
others with rubber scissors.
You are a windbag with a pig's anus for a spit valve. I suggest you mate
with Robert and produce those greasy little pork sausages everyone likes
in diners.
Love,
DMH
PK
> This is silly. The people in alt.surrealism have no interest in
> discussion. If it can't generate flames then Barrett/Dale/Brandon will
> not respond.
You are wrong. What holds up discussion in alt.surrealism is
the interminable crossposted nonsense and flames.
#Paul
Dale Houstman
True, but Andrea doesn't mind being wrong, because it is what makes her
right. She thinks because someone more articulate than the blowflies she
attracts (R.M., Cadmium Poop, etal) dislikes her then she has reified
herself. Otherwise she has no existence worth mentioning. If only her
falcon believes in Andrea then who is she? If she relented in her
mindless onrushing of aggression (divorced from discussion) and joined
in collective speech, she would only be another one of the participants
rather than the guiding light for the blind she has erected herself
into, a false Pharos. One can only hope that a sudden stroke (or maybe a
midnight assault by one of her errant lost boys) will put out the
smoldering matchlight in her unfaceted gaze.
In the meantime, R.M. is preparing to angrily tell you that you have
misspelled "interminable" while spelling his own name incorrectly.
Questions:
If, as R.M. so succinctly stated, I was in danger of losing my
"credibility" (amongst the worms in his warm cheeselog?) because I
misspelled "mangoes" (which is correct), then why can't the little
hollow blowpipe realize that he is in danger of losing his because he
caught me (angrily) in a non-error, while misspelling the plural of
"sty." Or do these brilliant blunted arrows of his only fire one way?
Why can't he grab hold of his "throbbing member" and shift his
"gaping cunt" of a mind into any gear other than self-humiliation?
Does Andrea have any thoughts besides the one she seems incapable of
expressing over and over? What is it like to have a cortex that's been
scraped out like an aborted fetus? Is she "Yoko" to R.M.'s "John"? When
she slips into her barbed wire camisole at night and kisses the falcon
goodnight, does she dream of beinig eviscerated by a forklift driven by
R.M.? When they dream of meeting one another, why does it always happen
in a manure lagoon? Why is she singing "Dr. Mengeles' Love Theme"? Who
beat her more when she was a young offal-eater: Mommy with the hot iron,
Daddy with his "Boy toy" belt, or the Barstool Strangler with his
"throbbing member"? Can we help her? Do we want to?
Ta
Dale