From Ts-si by Lisa Jain Thompson
Ruby
"For every man and woman born transsexual, there are a fifty to a hundred
thousand self-identified transgenders in the world. For every true
transgender, there are ten thousand crossdressers hiding within the masque
of gender identity.
The numbers are quite one sided. If you were to only read the internet
discussions at the thousands of sites that claim to be transgender, you
would come to believe the world was filled with tens of millions of men and
women who now suggest they are a transsexual of a different color. They
could no more remove their phalluses than they can avoid being misogynous.
In their numbers, the crossdressers and simulated transgenders, the pseudo
transsexuals, far outnumber those of us who were born transsexual. We cannot
hope to outshout them for their deep, baritone voices will surely drown us
out.
The media, of course, is not necessarily our friend. A crossdresser acting
out loudly in public always take precedence over the mother born transsexual
keeping house for her husband and children.
The garishly made-up activist in a clown suit is simply better television
than the quietly led lives of most transsexuals in America. We get the
treatments we need, have our operations, and get on with lives little
different from any other woman or man.
Broadcast and printed news thrives on victimhood. [N4] Cry yourself a victim
and you most assuredly will find your two minutes of fame at five, six, and
eleven on the evening news, especially if you come with visuals.
Lord knows the crossdressing terrorists provide good visuals. [N5] Even
better from a media viewpoint, the terrorists are always willing to provide
a good quote or do something outrageous that will titillate the average
reader or viewer.
Men and women born transsexual are not victims. Society owes us nothing
except a chance to correct our bodies and live our lives with the same
opportunities as all other native born citizens of the United States.
Against the seemingly endless waves of crossdressing clamor, we strive to be
the voices of reason and rationality in an otherwise obsessive world. The
sheer numbers may not be on our side - the crossdressers and poseurs surely
far outnumber us - but the science is.
In the end, we slowly win out, trusting in the collective wisdom of the
American people to know the difference between someone born transsexual and
the terrorists who continue to assault us. We shall survive."
fluffybunnie
wrote:
> http://ts-si.org/global-warning/24997-asymmetric-warfare-and-crossdressing-terrorism
>
> Men and women born transsexual are not victims. Society owes us nothing
> except a chance to correct our bodies and live our lives with the same
> opportunities as all other native born citizens of the United States.
>
> Against the seemingly endless waves of crossdressing clamor, we strive to be
> the voices of reason and rationality in an otherwise obsessive world. The
> sheer numbers may not be on our side - the crossdressers and poseurs surely
> far outnumber us - but the science is.
>
> In the end, we slowly win out, trusting in the collective wisdom of the
> American people to know the difference between someone born transsexual and
> the terrorists who continue to assault us. We shall survive."
>
Trouble is, Lardo, you are not part of the "we" to which your quote refers --
you are one of "them": an out-and-proud crossdressing, fetishistic gay male
living on taxpayer handouts, masquerading as a post-op while posrting under
your legal name (or supposedly your legal name) in order to gain attention
on the internet. You're a joke.
"We" refers to those of us who manage to quietly blend in, living as normal women,
making our own way through life.
:)
--
(\__/)
(=^.^=)
(")_(")
Barbie
> On 2010-05-29, Lardo the Klown, using his sockpuppet "Ruby
> <ru...@qwest.com>" wrote:
>> In the end, we slowly win out, trusting in the collective wisdom of the
>> American people to know the difference between someone born transsexual
>> and the terrorists who continue to assault us. We shall survive."
>>
>
> Trouble is, Lardo, you are not part of the "we" to which your quote refers
> -- you are one of "them": an out-and-proud crossdressing, fetishistic gay
> male living on taxpayer handouts, masquerading as a post-op while posting
> under
> your legal name (or supposedly your legal name) in order to gain
> attention on the internet. You're a joke.
>
> "We" refers to those of us who manage to quietly blend in, living as
> normal women, making our own way through life.
> :)
You know how it is with transquislings like Jennifer Usher. Porkchop and his
ilk can only receive validation by a policy of exclusion and name-calling.
However, the American people aren't buying it. To the contrary, June is
LGBT Pride month, not LGB Pride, and not TS Pride. Resorting to Bushisms
like calling your opponents "terrorists" is so last-decade.
It's more reminiscent of the racism in Rhodesia, where people were "too
black" to be white, or "too white" to be black. In the end, the distinction
was meaningless, just like "if you don't keep kosher, you're not a real jew"
or "if you don't believe in *my* god you're going to hell."
What can I say ... transquislings are so desperate for any form of
validation that their whole lives revolve around the issue. And in
attempting to get it, they don't realize just how much they undermine
themselves, because, like an underwater home-owner pretending they can hold
out for a better offer, everyone can smell their flop sweat.
Bottom line - transsexuals are by definition part and parcel of the
transgendered. Denial is stupid. But Usher and his ilk have nothing else.
Jennifer Usher
"Ruby" <ru...@qwest.com> wrote in message
news:htrqgd$uaa$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
> http://ts-si.org/global-warning/24997-asymmetric-warfare-and-crossdressing-terrorism
>
> "For every man and woman born transsexual, there are a fifty to a hundred
> thousand self-identified transgenders in the world. For every true
> transgender, there are ten thousand crossdressers hiding within the masque
> of gender identity.
She has a good point, but I think her numbers are bit high. I would say
more like 500 to a thousand perhaps, but nowhere near 50,000 to 100,000 per
transsexual. And most of those 500 to a thousand would be some variety of
crossdresser for the most part.
> The numbers are quite one sided. If you were to only read the internet
> discussions at the thousands of sites that claim to be transgender, you
> would come to believe the world was filled with tens of millions of men
> and women who now suggest they are a transsexual of a different color.
> They could no more remove their phalluses than they can avoid being
> misogynous.
Yes, one would get the idea that they have huge numbers, but that is because
they try to inflate their own numbers. And no, most of them would never
give up their penises. And on the rare occasion that they do, the results
can be quite disastrous.
> In their numbers, the crossdressers and simulated transgenders, the pseudo
> transsexuals, far outnumber those of us who were born transsexual. We
> cannot hope to outshout them for their deep, baritone voices will surely
> drown us out.
Very true.
> The media, of course, is not necessarily our friend. A crossdresser acting
> out loudly in public always take precedence over the mother born
> transsexual keeping house for her husband and children.
This is very true. They are narcissistic and seek out the public eye.
> The garishly made-up activist in a clown suit is simply better television
> than the quietly led lives of most transsexuals in America. We get the
> treatments we need, have our operations, and get on with lives little
> different from any other woman or man.
Very true.
> Broadcast and printed news thrives on victimhood. [N4] Cry yourself a
> victim and you most assuredly will find your two minutes of fame at five,
> six, and eleven on the evening news, especially if you come with visuals.
Again, very true. As I have observed, the TG movement loves a good martyr
and seems to despise any attempt to warn people to be safe. They want to
argue that they should be able to expect men who suddenly discover that
their date has a penis to just accept that and act as though nothing is
amiss. While I do not believe that such a discovery justifies violence, I
also recognize that such can, and does happen. Better safe than dead, but
not to those who are seeking the next martyr to honor come November 20th.
> Lord knows the crossdressing terrorists provide good visuals. [N5] Even
> better from a media viewpoint, the terrorists are always willing to
> provide a good quote or do something outrageous that will titillate the
> average reader or viewer.
Very true.
> Men and women born transsexual are not victims. Society owes us nothing
> except a chance to correct our bodies and live our lives with the same
> opportunities as all other native born citizens of the United States.
Well, we can be victims of those who would exploit us to push their own
agenda.
> Against the seemingly endless waves of crossdressing clamor, we strive to
> be the voices of reason and rationality in an otherwise obsessive world.
> The sheer numbers may not be on our side - the crossdressers and poseurs
> surely far outnumber us - but the science is.
Quite true.
> In the end, we slowly win out, trusting in the collective wisdom of the
> American people to know the difference between someone born transsexual
> and the terrorists who continue to assault us. We shall survive."
Actually, we are beginning to win. ENDA, if it does pass, is looking more
and more like it will be *transsexual* inclusive, not transgender inclusive.
It will provide only minimal protection to those who are not transsexual.
One might not get fired for crossdressing on occasion, but the dream of
doing it at work when the mood strikes is pretty much a non-starter, and it
looks like there will be specific bathroom restrictions that will really hit
non-ops hard.
--
Jennifer Usher
Jennifer Usher
"Barbie" <bar...@transboutique.com> wrote in message
news:htsfav$ot$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> fluffybunnie wrote:
>
>> On 2010-05-29, Lardo the Klown, using his sockpuppet "Ruby
>> <ru...@qwest.com>" wrote:
>>> In the end, we slowly win out, trusting in the collective wisdom of the
>>> American people to know the difference between someone born transsexual
>>> and the terrorists who continue to assault us. We shall survive."
>>>
>>
>> Trouble is, Lardo, you are not part of the "we" to which your quote
>> refers
>> -- you are one of "them": an out-and-proud crossdressing, fetishistic gay
>> male living on taxpayer handouts, masquerading as a post-op while posting
>> under
>> your legal name (or supposedly your legal name) in order to gain
>> attention on the internet. You're a joke.
Well, I agree, I am not a part of the "we" that includes Goat Boy. Nobody
reads this group, so I am hardly gaining attention. As to the rest, well
not even remotely true. But then it is also not true that I am Ruby, but
such facts are lost on idiots such as this.
>> "We" refers to those of us who manage to quietly blend in, living as
>> normal women, making our own way through life.
>> :)
Trust me, Goat Boy does not "quietly blend in." At least he didn't in San
Francisco. He was clearly transgender when he was in the shelter. Everyone
knew he was one "them."
> You know how it is with transquislings like Jennifer Usher. Porkchop and
> his
> ilk can only receive validation by a policy of exclusion and name-calling.
> However, the American people aren't buying it. To the contrary, June is
> LGBT Pride month, not LGB Pride, and not TS Pride. Resorting to Bushisms
> like calling your opponents "terrorists" is so last-decade.
I really love how Mr. Hudson has no real arguments. I also love how he
whines about name-calling, while....well, name-calling. As to the American
people...well, like I said before, ENDA will be transsexual inclusive, not
TG inclusive.
> It's more reminiscent of the racism in Rhodesia, where people were "too
> black" to be white, or "too white" to be black. In the end, the
> distinction
> was meaningless, just like "if you don't keep kosher, you're not a real
> jew"
> or "if you don't believe in *my* god you're going to hell."
It is a bad joke when TGs like Mr. Hudson try to claim to be "like" blacks.
Race is an inherent trait. Being TG, as opposed to true transsexualism, is
a chosen behavior.
> What can I say ... transquislings are so desperate for any form of
> validation that their whole lives revolve around the issue. And in
> attempting to get it, they don't realize just how much they undermine
> themselves, because, like an underwater home-owner pretending they can
> hold
> out for a better offer, everyone can smell their flop sweat.
ROTFL! Irony is totally wasted on idiots like Mr. Hudson.
> Bottom line - transsexuals are by definition part and parcel of the
> transgendered. Denial is stupid. But Usher and his ilk have nothing else.
Mr. Hudson is a classic gender fascist. He demands to label everyone as he
pleases, not recognizing that he is doing that which he claims to hate.
Nope, no one is transgender who does not willing identify as such. It is
not an objective label, it is a subjective identity. That is why they are
losing on the ENDA thing.
--
Jennifer Usher
Barbie
> Mr. Hudson is a classic gender fascist. He demands to label everyone as
> he pleases, not recognizing that he is doing that which he claims to hate.
> Nope, no one is transgender who does not willing identify as such. It is
> not an objective label, it is a subjective identity. That is why they are
> losing on the ENDA thing.
The only fascist wanna-be here is you. You have, over the period of a
decade, gone out of your way to promote hatred, intolerance, and your own
bigoted brand of stupidity, and have ruined this place. You kept insisting
that you had to post here to counteract other people's posts - how does it
feel now that the shoe is 100% on the other foot?
*Nobody* cares what you think. That's why I don't get upset when you go
"Mr." Hudson - I consider the source.
Just like I don't get upset when you criticize transboutique.com I just
have to compare it to YOUR justjenniferblog.blogspot.com. Now *there* is a
joke.
And I think it's really funny that you said transboutique was dead because I
had to delay doing the updates for a week. If that's the case, your blog is
on perma-dead status.
The only reason for the delayed updates was because I was releasing 600k of
source code under the GPLv3 license, and that meant not just prepping the
code, but doing some documentation, example code, and building 3 web sites
(.com, .net, .org) to support it. Unlike you, who have claimed to be a
programmer, I actually am.
But let's do a fair apples-to-apples comparison of our two chef d'ouvres:
Total posts in May:
Your blog: 4
Transboutique: *39*
Total posts this year:
Your blog: 15
Transboutique: *230*
Total real pictures of the author:
Your blog: 0
Transboutique: *2* - profile and topic
Total *fake* pictures of the author:
Your blog: *1*
Transboutique: 0
Total pictures posted with stories:
Your blog: 0
Transboutique: *227* - profile and topic
Layout:
Your blog: Generic:
Transboutique: *Customized*, with *28* different themes.
(which reminds me, have to update the list)
User can also choose to show/hide different content
Email notifications:
Your blog: 0
Transboutique: *Customizable* per user -
Yes/no for each of *17* different sections
Calendar
Your blog: 0
Transboutique: *Site* *calendar* plus personal calendar for *each* *user*
Topics:
Your blog: 1
Transboutique: *Over* *a* *dozen* (I just added the Video category)
Show all stories under a topic by clicking on the topic icon?
Your blog: no
Transboutique: *yes*
RSS feeds:
Your blog: 1
Transboutique: *14*
Total searchable external web pages:
Your blog: 0
Transboutique: *2,282* - profile and topic
Advanced search:
Your blog: Only the basic blogger search
Transboutique: *yes*
all key words
any key words
exact match
from date to date
by topic or by all topics
by type - all, stories, comments, calendar, links, static pages
by author
Extendible:
Your blog: No - only what blogger has
Transboutique: Anything I want to add - it's a real domain.
Terms of service:
Yours: what blogger says
Transboutique: what I say
Privacy policy:
Yours: what blogger says
Transboutique: what I say
Yours is a mostly-dead blog. Transboutique is a fully functional web site.
You lose on everything that counts. No wonder you don't like reality - for
you, *reality* *bites*. You criticize it at every turn. but that's because
transquislings like Jennifer Usher *have* to criticize the real thing, lest
people look and see that Usher is a fake.
You're just The Gender Titanic - an object lesson; You've got Titanic Gender
Sociopathology. Then again, your life has been a series of wrong guesses -
transvestite writing crappy transvestite porn, more than a transvestite but
less than a transsexual, transsexual, true transsexual, woman born
transsexual, just a woman, christian woman, but in every iteration, always a
kook. In reality, porkchop, you'll always be known to us as Lardo the
Clown.
And you're still a loser,
And we all laugh at you.
Now don't take it the wrong way - nobody hates you. We just find it funny
that you keep on repeating the same garbage that has always made you so
unpopular, and expect different results.
Jennifer Usher
"Barbie" <bar...@transboutique.com> wrote in message
news:htt1s2$hrt$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> Jennifer Usher the transquisling so predictably JUMP USHER JUMPed:
Mr. Hudson, who is just so butch, likes to maintain the illusion that he has
some control. He doesn't.
>> Mr. Hudson is a classic gender fascist. He demands to label everyone as
>> he pleases, not recognizing that he is doing that which he claims to
>> hate.
>> Nope, no one is transgender who does not willing identify as such. It is
>> not an objective label, it is a subjective identity. That is why they
>> are
>> losing on the ENDA thing.
>
> The only fascist wanna-be here is you. You have, over the period of a
> decade, gone out of your way to promote hatred, intolerance, and your own
> bigoted brand of stupidity, and have ruined this place. You kept insisting
> that you had to post here to counteract other people's posts - how does it
> feel now that the shoe is 100% on the other foot?
Don't you just love it when they start to really lose it. Nope, I don't
promote any of those things. I do tend to expose them, just as I am doing
here with Mr. Hudson. He is a classic example of the sort of narcissist
that thinks he should be a great leader of the transgender community. Of
course, he just parrots the party line. Disagree with their agenda, and you
are guilty of hatred, intolerance, and bigotry. A very small group of
people are demanding to have their misbehavior become accepted as "normal."
Of course, deep down this is not what they want. If people were not shocked
by their behavior, it would quickly lose its thrill. Shoot, people like Mr.
Hudson used to be content to dress up at home. Now they are not happy if
they are not shoving it in other people's faces, and making them smile and
pretend it is just perfectly normal.
Actually, I would love to see someone make a serious effort to counteract my
posts. What I do see is a bunch of angry men in dresses spouting insults
because they have nothing else. And if that fails....well,,,
> *Nobody* cares what you think. That's why I don't get upset when you go
> "Mr." Hudson - I consider the source.
They go for bravado,,,,
> Just like I don't get upset when you criticize transboutique.com I just
> have to compare it to YOUR justjenniferblog.blogspot.com. Now *there* is
> a
> joke.
Oh, really? At least people read my blog. And link to it.
> And I think it's really funny that you said transboutique was dead because
> I
> had to delay doing the updates for a week. If that's the case, your blog
> is
> on perma-dead status.
ROTFL! There is quantity....posting drivel just to maintain the illusion
that one is relevant, and then there is quality.
> The only reason for the delayed updates was because I was releasing 600k
> of
> source code under the GPLv3 license, and that meant not just prepping the
> code, but doing some documentation, example code, and building 3 web sites
> (.com, .net, .org) to support it. Unlike you, who have claimed to be a
> programmer, I actually am.
Translation..."I have to give my stuff away to maintain an illusion of being
a real programmer."
That's nice.
Let's just say that the stuff I work on in my spare time is not for free.
> But let's do a fair apples-to-apples comparison of our two chef d'ouvres:
>
>
> Total posts in May:
> Your blog: 4
> Transboutique: *39*
Yes, four posts that were actually original writing....
39 posts that are most just a rehash of stuff from a mailing list.
> Total posts this year:
> Your blog: 15
> Transboutique: *230*
15 original posts versus 230 bits of drivel that no one actually reads.
> Total real pictures of the author:
> Your blog: 0
> Transboutique: *2* - profile and topic
Oh, so that IS Mr. Hudson in that tacky wig and obvious attempt to hide a
honking Adam's apple.
> Total *fake* pictures of the author:
> Your blog: *1*
> Transboutique: 0
ROTFL! Hardly a fake. It was created from a photo of myself.
> Total pictures posted with stories:
> Your blog: 0
> Transboutique: *227* - profile and topic
ROTFL! Actually, I have posted a few pictures, taken by myself. I don't
steal stuff from other sites.
> Layout:
> Your blog: Generic:
> Transboutique: *Customized*, with *28* different themes.
> (which reminds me, have to update the list)
> User can also choose to show/hide different content
A bit busy....
> Email notifications:
> Your blog: 0
> Transboutique: *Customizable* per user -
> Yes/no for each of *17* different sections
So?
> Calendar
> Your blog: 0
> Transboutique: *Site* *calendar* plus personal calendar for *each* *user*
Wow, you mean all three of the users can have a person calendar?
> Topics:
> Your blog: 1
> Transboutique: *Over* *a* *dozen* (I just added the Video category)
That because, my blog is just that, a blog.
> Show all stories under a topic by clicking on the topic icon?
> Your blog: no
> Transboutique: *yes*
So?
> RSS feeds:
> Your blog: 1
> Transboutique: *14*
>
>
> Total searchable external web pages:
> Your blog: 0
> Transboutique: *2,282* - profile and topic
Yes, you can go to all those other transvestite sites.
> Advanced search:
> Your blog: Only the basic blogger search
> Transboutique: *yes*
> all key words
> any key words
> exact match
> from date to date
> by topic or by all topics
> by type - all, stories, comments, calendar, links, static pages
> by author
Yes, the rare person who visits can search to their hearts content.
> Extendible:
> Your blog: No - only what blogger has
> Transboutique: Anything I want to add - it's a real domain.
In another words, he has paid a small monthly fee to boost his ego.
> Terms of service:
> Yours: what blogger says
> Transboutique: what I say
Now, this is an interesting difference. My blog is pretty much open to
anyone who wants to comment. Unless they post attacks on others, or try to
invade myself or others privacy, they are pretty much welcome. I don't feel
the need to censor people. I am not afraid of what others have to say. In
fact, pretty much the only posts that have been removed have been from some
person who keeps posting links to Asian porn.
Mr. Hudson's blog? He tries to control what people say. He is not going to
allow dissent. Shoot, he got in a fight with Lask because Lask posted
something he didn't like.
> Privacy policy:
> Yours: what blogger says
> Transboutique: what I say
I don't really need a privacy policy. Then again, neither does Mr. Hudson,
but he likes to pretend
> Yours is a mostly-dead blog. Transboutique is a fully functional web site.
Now we come down to the fun part. People actually read my blog. As best as
can be told, hardly anyone reads Mr. Hudson's. No one leaves comments
there, no one participates. It is just, as I say, dead. My blog has
regular readers, is linked to by other blogs of similar interest, and has
regular comments.
> You lose on everything that counts. No wonder you don't like reality - for
> you, *reality* *bites*. You criticize it at every turn. but that's
> because
> transquislings like Jennifer Usher *have* to criticize the real thing,
> lest
> people look and see that Usher is a fake.
ROTFL! Yeah, sure...
> You're just The Gender Titanic - an object lesson; You've got Titanic
> Gender
> Sociopathology. Then again, your life has been a series of wrong
> guesses -
> transvestite writing crappy transvestite porn, more than a transvestite
> but
> less than a transsexual, transsexual, true transsexual, woman born
> transsexual, just a woman, christian woman, but in every iteration, always
> a
> kook. In reality, porkchop, you'll always be known to us as Lardo the
> Clown.
Good grief, you write one piece of satire, and people take it seriously.
You struggle to come to grips with who you are, and people try to make it
something it was not. You complete your transition, and they just go to
pieces because they know they are the real fakes.
And does this turkey ever actually take a step back and read the idiocy he
posts? Titanic Gender Sociopathology? I mean, really, that is hilarious.
> And you're still a loser,
If it makes Mr. Hudson feel better to think that, so be it.
> And we all laugh at you.
And a lot of people are laughing at them.
> Now don't take it the wrong way - nobody hates you. We just find it funny
> that you keep on repeating the same garbage that has always made you so
> unpopular, and expect different results.
Oh, that is too funny. No....they don't hate anybody....unless they have
the courage to stand up to them. That is why they are so gentle in their
comments.
Really, I should be ashamed for teasing the mentally ill, but, well, maybe,
someday, they just might get a clue.
--
Jennifer Usher
And so are the Days of Our Tranny Lives
transsexual. I am what I always have been and I am legally recognised as is
a woman. To hell with this shit.
"Ruby" <ru...@qwest.com> wrote in message
news:htrqgd$uaa$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
--
www.lightningnews.com Lightning fast anonymous usenet downloads for 5$ only !
fluffybunnie
>
> Mr. Hudson is a classic gender fascist. He demands to label everyone as he
> pleases, not recognizing that he is doing that which he claims to hate.
>
Unbelieveable -- just zero self-awareness...
> Nope, no one is transgender who does not willing identify as such. It is
> not an objective label, it is a subjective identity. That is why they are
> losing on the ENDA thing.
>
I wonder what color Mr Usher thinks the sky is this morning?
Barbie
> The only reason for the delayed updates was because I was releasing 600k
>> of
>> source code under the GPLv3 license, and that meant not just prepping the
>> code, but doing some documentation, example code, and building 3 web
>> sites (.com, .net, .org) to support it. Unlike you, who have claimed to
>> be a programmer, I actually am.
>
> Translation..."I have to give my stuff away to maintain an illusion of
> being a real programmer."
>
> That's nice.
So IBM, Novell, Sun, Oracle, and all the other big corporations that back
open source don't have "real programmers"?
So freebsd, linux, java, firefox, openoffice, apache, mysql, postgresql,
php, perl, python weren't written by "real programmers"?
So google doesn't have "real programmers"? The android phone OS isn't
written by "real programmers"?
So Redhat doesn't make a profit by paying real programmers to write open-
source software to give away to the world?
Open source is eating closed-source software's lunch. Ask Microsoft - their
SEC filings identify open source software as their #1 threat. Open source
lets bugs be identified and fixed quicker, at lower cost, so it ends up
being both more robust and more secure.
Open source software is peer-reviewed software. Then again, you're also
against peer review - it exposes you as a fake. Just like some people won't
open-source their software out of shame because it looks like dirty
underwear, you spend all your time criticizing because you can't do better.
Closed source software is so last century. Then again, you wouldn't
understand open source - you need an open mind.
And we're still all laughing at you, because you deserve it, porkchop. Stuck
in your own 1970 Hotel California existence. An original thought would die
of loneliness.
Jennifer Usher
"Barbie" <bar...@transboutique.com> wrote in message
news:htu4f3$up8$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> Jennifer Usher wrote:
>
>> The only reason for the delayed updates was because I was releasing 600k
>>> of
>>> source code under the GPLv3 license, and that meant not just prepping
>>> the
>>> code, but doing some documentation, example code, and building 3 web
>>> sites (.com, .net, .org) to support it. Unlike you, who have claimed to
>>> be a programmer, I actually am.
>>
>> Translation..."I have to give my stuff away to maintain an illusion of
>> being a real programmer."
>>
>> That's nice.
>
> So IBM, Novell, Sun, Oracle, and all the other big corporations that back
> open source don't have "real programmers"?
They do that as a means of promoting stuff that they sell, not as their sole
business model.
> So freebsd, linux, java, firefox, openoffice, apache, mysql, postgresql,
> php, perl, python weren't written by "real programmers"?
>
> So google doesn't have "real programmers"? The android phone OS isn't
> written by "real programmers"?
>
> So Redhat doesn't make a profit by paying real programmers to write open-
> source software to give away to the world?
>
> Open source is eating closed-source software's lunch. Ask Microsoft -
> their
> SEC filings identify open source software as their #1 threat. Open source
> lets bugs be identified and fixed quicker, at lower cost, so it ends up
> being both more robust and more secure.
ROTFL!
> Open source software is peer-reviewed software. Then again, you're also
> against peer review - it exposes you as a fake. Just like some people
> won't
> open-source their software out of shame because it looks like dirty
> underwear, you spend all your time criticizing because you can't do
> better.
I have no objection to being reviewed by my peers, but silly men in dresses,
pretending to be transsexuals when they are really crossdressers (i.e. like
Tom Hudson) are not my peers.
> Closed source software is so last century. Then again, you wouldn't
> understand open source - you need an open mind.
>
> And we're still all laughing at you, because you deserve it, porkchop.
> Stuck
> in your own 1970 Hotel California existence. An original thought would die
> of loneliness.
YAWN.
--
Jennifer Usher