Ah friendship ! I agree with you Nicki and feel your good intent and Michelles. Lest we forget in this modern age how oft the improbable doth startle us, LET THE SINGING LESSONS CONTINUE < I hope you don't think me impertinent to cast in my lot with you . I have never met her,yet years ago in the mirror, someone ever so like her. Would that I then had friends such as you . Perhaps I would have roused myself more swiftly. BTW Nicky , I love the way you write, cogent, crisp, vivid, and ever so heartfelt it is palpable. Karen is fortunate to have this electronic medium, confrontational yet not. I believe this group is very therapeutic, certainly it is for me. Thank you.
-- Natasha F ---------------------------------------- Let Love Dispell Hatred ----------------------------------------
>Michelle Steiner <miche...@michelle.org> wrote: >> What is the purpose of this message, Nikki?
>What is the purpose? Geez, Michelle, I should have imagined it was pretty >clear. This is a discussion and support group and I participate pretty >fully. I'm getting tired of having every friggin' thread hijacked into a >discussion of whether Karen does or does not pass and whether it's because >of poor HRT results. It annoyed the hell out of me to see her use Dawn's >comments as the latest jumping off point, especially considering all that >Dawn has had to go through. It was just unseemly.
>But also, contrary to your implication that I'm doing this only to piss >Karen off or because I'm pissed off, I do honestly wish Karen would take my >comments to heart because I think if she did, she could improve her lot. I >appreciate that this does appear to be as pointless as trying to teach a >pig to sing, but I dunno, I just gotta try anyway. If I thought you life >was circling the bowl and you needed a good knock on the head to wake up, >I'd do the same for you, too. :) >-- >Nicki Hamilton >http://www.hamiltonlabs.com/biography.htm
k...@world.std.com wrote: > hmm I wonder why people transition if they are so happy with themselves and > their lives and their place in society? If eveything fits and is working, why > change?
Because there is a world of diference in not liking yourself and not liking which gender you happenned to be born into. The former is a far more serious and difficult condition to cure and is often confused, even by those seeking SRS, with the latter condition which is cured by a few femmy pills and a bit of cut and paste.
> My problems are not self made for the most part IMO.
Excuse me while I gag myself with this handy spoon.... Karen ALL your problems are self-induced. Problem have solutions and when you refuse to implement the solution then YOU become the problem. Wife doesn't like you're lifestyle? Too Fat?? Problems at work??? Deal with it. If you don't - or won't - then YOU are the problem.
> My bigest problem is a physical one for which there is no solution that i can > see. THAT is what is atring me appart.
No you're biggest problem is that you're boring all those around you (and I"m not just talking about this newsgroup) with your incessant whining about your "unsolveable" problems. Heck you annoy the bejezus out of me just listening to the occasional snippets on the newsgroup - I pity the souls who must have to hear this in 3D. People will isolate themselves from you ,just as I and others have, because if you haven't grown up already then they certainly aren't going to spend the time to nursemaid you through the same difficulties that all of us - yes ALL of us go through. THAT'S what sets you apart.
> Generalizing from your own results are dangerous.I can show you a lot of > people (including myself) that there is little differece in. Believe it or > not ther IS a wide variety of response to HRT. It does make the majority > reasonably passable with time - but not all. I'm in that minority and that is > exacerbated by the bad luck of my build. Women simply DON"T have frames like > mine and because my HRT results are mininal there is no way to hide that all > the time.
Whine whine whine.... So you're not Miss America. Neither am I. Get over it and get on with life because frankely my dear most of us don't give a damn. Why should we if you dont?
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
> ... 6ft 360lbs when I started, I overcame my fears > and decided to transition and got down to 220lbs, > transitoned dispite poor HRT results ... > People need to know that HRT does not work magic > for everyone and will not cahnge basic body structure > and only a very low percentage of TS's can afford > the services of Dr. Ousterhout and his ilk.
Okay, I think I've had it by now and it's time to line up and shoot down some myths.
Myth #1: Karen had poor results on HRT.
She didn't. Okay, she didn't grow huge boobs but then again very few TS women approaching or past 40 get all that much development. And anyway, this is an eminently fixable problem and one shared with a whole lot of genetic females! That's why they invented implants, which Karen =got=! Given the rest of what we face, does it really matter whether you got your boobs through hormones or with the help of a surgeon? I'm getting implants just like most everyone else here. You think I or anyone else loses a lot of sleep that they can't have "real" boobs? Give me a break! The rest of us have lives to lead and no time for that nonsense.
As for the rest of her "poor results," well, what could this possibly mean? Karen has, by her own admission, probably the most feminine features of anyone in our local support group here in Boston. Okay, well, maybe I'm catching up a little, but golly, it cost me $27,000 and some incredibly intense pain (see http://www.hamiltonlabs.com/FacialSurgery.htm) to even get into the same ballpark with her. And I still don't have a complexion like Karen's. The only person I know with skin like that is my 8-year-old child! The skin on Karen's hands is just like that, too.
Me, my skin looks (because it's true) like I spent too much time bicycling in the Texas sun when I was in my 20s and then scarred it up for good measure with some poor electrolysis. I've seen oranges with smoother skin than mine! Okay, maybe I can fix it somewhat, but the way to do that is laser skin resurfacing, which works (not without risk) by painfully frying off the whole top layer of skin on your face, leaving your face indistinguishable from a mound of oozing hamburger for a week or so. Even supposing I do all that, it's pretty obvious to me my skin will never look like Karen's. But do you see me pulling a Karen number here, poor Nicole, her skin is so bad? Oh, horseshit! Of course not!
So what's left? Well, there's body hair, I guess, but Karen hasn't got a lot of that. Okay, I don't have a lot either, but I've had hundreds of hours of electrolysis all over my whole body to get there.
Finally, I suppose in some fantasy world estrogen might work as a great diet pill or maybe even shrink one's skeletal frame, but I just don't see that happening in this one. Which brings me to myth #2.
Myth #2: Karen is saddled with a big build that's beyond her control.
In another message she posted into this discussion, Karen claims she was on a diet of only 1200 calories/day for a year and a half. Well, I've known Karen for over a year and anytime there's food around, Karen eats like she's getting ready to hibernate. She's got an eating disorder.
Last spring, she and I and another friend drove down in my car together to see Menard speak at the XX Club in Hartford. On the way out the door, I grabbed up a bunch of bags of Pepperidge Farm cookies and other munchies out of my kitchen just to throw in the car for the drive. It was lots of stuff because it was lots of kinds and I didn't know what anyone liked. We got onto the Mass Pike and immediately had to stop so Karen could stock up with a Whopper and fries and whatever else they had. By the time we got to Hartford (at most, a two-hour drive) I looked in the back seat to discover Karen had eaten =everything=. Usually when people eat cookies, they leave crumbs. There wasn't even a crumb. So this was a Whopper, fries, whatever, plus something like two or three pounds of cookies in a period of two hours.
After the talk, a bunch of us walked over to get an early dinner at a local restaurant. While everyone else was ordering stuff like a little cup of clam chowder; Karen ordered something they brought out in a bucket! Well, maybe not a bucket, but it was a =huge= bowl of soup, followed by an enormous dinner.
1200 calories/day? When was that? One day when Burger King was closed?
Yes, it's true that Karen is a little tall (about 6', I guess) and she may be somewhat "big-boned." But mostly, she's big because she eats too much. She talks about her 40" ribcage as if these were the bones sticking out. Well, let me tell you, it's not bones. If Karen were to get her weight down into a healthy range for a female her height, her body would look much better. Maybe not immediately, because obviously she might experience some problems of loose skin 'till it tightened back up, but ultimately, she'd look much better.
You've all seen her claims that she's tried it to see if she'd look better slimmer and it didn't help. Absurd! She's never gotten her weight down anywhere near where she should and, no surprise, to look at her, I doubt she can spell exercise, much less that she's ever really done any.
Myth #3. Karen doesn't pass because she's too big.
This is not Karen's real problem passing, to whatever extent she even has a problem. The real problems are in other areas: First, she's done almost nothing to modify her behavior to be all that feminine. Look at her sitting on a couch, for example, and she's usually got one leg up over the other, resting an ankle on her knee, guy-style. Her "excuse" is that she can't cross her legs at the knees like a woman because (how did this happen?) she's too fat. When she walks, she carries her shoulders hunched forward with her arms held close to her body, sort of like a quarterback sneaking the ball. She seems to make no attempt to mimic the loose, fluid style of movement you see typical of most women.
Second, she rarely smiles and has this look about her as if she's just shoplifted something and doesn't want to be caught. She looks guilty! You can't do that and expect to pass!
Third, her clothing and makeup have all the style and pizzazz of a rummage sale. Now, I really do appreciate that when you're that big (once again, how did this happen?), that it must be more difficult to find interesting clothes. But I was struck by Andrea Bennett's suggestion (originally over in s.s.tg) that Karen should work on these things. So far as I know, I don't think Andrea's ever seen Karen or would have any other way of knowing this is a problem, but I'll tell you, it is.
Now, okay, I admit, maybe I should talk! Me, I'm rarely in anything but jeans and tee shirts, wearing only my breakfast, certainly no makeup! But the difference is I haven't been the one moaning about passing. So it seems to me that if you are worried enough to complain, it ought to be worth it to you to work on a flattering, professional woman's wardrobe. Heck, the other day, I was visiting a customer (a big local software company) and there's everyone all dressed up, including a couple women I thought had to be even bigger than Karen and they looked great. But the difference is they were wearing some great clothes; stuff you could put over a Buick and make it look sexy.
Myth #4. Karen doesn't pass.
Well, this one's the most stupidly annoying of the whole bunch. Frankly, she makes so little genuine effort to pass besides jabbing herself with estrodial injections, you'd think she really wouldn't pass. And you'd be wrong! She actually passes just fine. Certainly, before I went off to Ousterhout, I'm sure she was passing better than I was. Matter of fact, if anyone saw me first in profile, I almost always got read. But again, there were some healthy differences: First, I was able to keep some perspective here, dammit! Passing is NOT everything and though I fully admit that while I revel today in what Ousterhout has done for me, anyone who knows me can tell you I was a happy person before this even when I expected I would never pass all that well. For me, and I suggest, for anyone who's TS, the reason to transition is so you can be =you=, not so you can pass. And your measure of success should be how well you =are= you, not whether you pass.
Second, I was willing to do something about it. I was willing to spend some money and undergo a lot of pain on something that honestly I was not sure would necessarily improve anything. I was also willing to accept the consequences of the surgery, which not everyone talks about, namely that my nose near the septum and the whole top of my head are completely numb, with no guarantee that sensation will ever return. (This is the inevitable consequence of the incisions Ousterhout has to make across the nerves.) I was also willing to accept the risk of possible facial paralysis and other complications. As a friend in NY who's also an Ousterhout grad, put it: Ousterhout's patients tend to look better than they feel. Well, whatever, I viewed all this as a small consequence, but the point is, I was willing to do something and I was willing to accept that nothing in life of any value is ever free.
Finally, I am annoyed by the comment about the few TS who can afford "Ousterhout and his ilk." I find this just a little offensive. Okay, yes, I had the money to spend on Ousterhout. Well, guess what? The reason I had it is because I took big chances and worked my tail off these last 11 years starting a business. And it =was= hard. When I started my business, I went from, I dunno, maybe $70K/year in 1987 as an engineering manager to ZERO(!!) for the next 15 months as I wrote the first release of my product. My first full year of sales after that, I had a net income of $710. The next year, my net was still less than $11K. So for better than 3 years, I averaged less than $4K/year
...
Karenn (k...@world.std.com) wrote: >I will never pass *well enough* to woodwork. I've >said that visually I probably pass *casual* glances about 90% of the time - >BUT that means 1 out of every 10 people reads me. It's impossible to build >can't the life I want because of it.
Then accept the situation and make the best of it. This doesn't mean you can't live and be accepted as a woman, you just won't be able to be totally stealth.
That is not as bad as you seem to think. Your womanhood is not dependant upon your past being hidden and never being figured out. It doesn't have to matter if other's figure out you are a post op Transsexual IF they still accept you as a woman.
Make it your goal to be so completely the woman you are, so comfortable in being the woman you are, that those, who read you as a Transsexual woman or are informed of it by someone else who reads you, determine that it is in the end irrelevant to your womanhood.
They will only do so when they pick up from your manner, confidence and demeanor that you consider it irrelevant and that you truly are a woman, even if you do have a frame that makes it so many realize you are a Transsexual too.
I am glad you are on anti-depressants, I think they will help you gain such confidence. If they don't tell your Md and get another prescription until it works.
In article <77gl5s$an...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, k...@world.std.com writes: >*IF* I said that, I meant I will never pass *well enough* to woodwork. I've >said that visually I probably pass *casual* glances about 90% of the time - >BUT that means 1 out of every 10 people reads me. It's impossible to build >can't the life I want because of it.
Silly Karen! Demanding perfection -- of yourself or others -- leads only to performance anxiety. I have no numeric idea how well I'm passing, but wouldn't be surprised to find it in the neighborhood of 90%.
The question, rather, is how well people treat you. Do they act as if their life is better for having you in it? I get that, even from my 10%. If they like you, they'll accept you. And isn't it acceptance as yourself that's important?
Nicole Hamilton <hamil...@hamiltonlabs.com> wrote:
> Myth #1: Karen had poor results on HRT.
> She didn't. Okay, she didn't grow huge boobs but then again very few TS > women approaching or past 40 get all that much development.
I got just about no body fat redistribution and not much facial change.
> As for the rest of her "poor results," well, what could this possibly mean? > Karen has, by her own admission, probably the most feminine features of > anyone in our local support group here in Boston.
Those "feartures" were mostly in place BEFORE HRT.
> get into the same ballpark with her. And I still don't have a complexion > like Karen's. The only person I know with skin like that is my 8-year-old > child! The skin on Karen's hands is just like that, too.
Not on the hands. But I have gotten geart skin out of this and I admit that. It's the one area where I *have* gotten good results.
> like Karen's. But do you see me pulling a Karen number here, poor Nicole, > her skin is so bad? Oh, horseshit! Of course not!
You have a build in the normal female range. Mine is NOWHERE near it.
> So what's left? Well, there's body hair, I guess, but Karen hasn't got a > lot of that.
Actually I do but I shave it.
> Myth #2: Karen is saddled with a big build that's beyond her control.
> In another message she posted into this discussion, Karen claims she was on > a diet of only 1200 calories/day for a year and a half. Well, I've known > Karen for over a year and anytime there's food around, Karen eats like > she's getting ready to hibernate. She's got an eating disorder.
You are not in possestion of all the facts (not that it ever stops you from having an opinion) . I am not lying. If you have the courage ask my wife about the time I was dieting. She was absolutely amazed by the willpower I displayed and the length of time I kept it up. I showed you pictures of what I looked like when i weighed 360lbs - remember?
I lost all that weight with that diet before you met me - and much of it befor I joined the group in the year I decided that i would transition. Last Febuary I was down to 220lbs - the lowest I've been since the 8th grade.I've been told my an MD that with my build below 180 would not be a healty weight.
When I realized that losing weight actually made me look worst because of my frame I lost the drive to keep it up and went a bit too far back in the other direction. It ws actually with the hope that, with the increased HRT it would go back on in the right places.
> Last spring, she and I and another friend drove down in my car together to > see Menard speak at the XX Club in Hartford. On the way out the door, I > grabbed up a bunch of bags of Pepperidge Farm cookies and other munchies > out of my kitchen just to throw in the car for the drive. It was lots of > stuff because it was lots of kinds and I didn't know what anyone liked. We > got onto the Mass Pike and immediately had to stop so Karen could stock up > with a Whopper and fries and whatever else they had.
I had a chicken sandwich small fries and a diet coke and had not eaten a bite previously that day. Stop exagerating!!!
> After the talk, a bunch of us walked over to get an early dinner at a local > restaurant. While everyone else was ordering stuff like a little cup of > clam chowder; Karen ordered something they brought out in a bucket! Well, > maybe not a bucket, but it was a =huge= bowl of soup, followed by an > enormous dinner.
I ordered a bowl of Chowder not knowing the size having never been in that restaurant and a single entree.
> 1200 calories/day? When was that? One day when Burger King was closed?
You damm well KNOW I put on a lot of weight since I met you. You saw the pictures of me at 360lbs and you saw me at my lowest weight (if you can remeber - you were going through a rough time tehn). HOW DARE YOU CALL ME A LIAR when you have seen the effinence of that diet with your own eyes. You forget facts when the are convient I see.
For that year and a half I was doing the intesive dieting by daily meals consisted of:
Breafast:one cup of cereal with 1 cup of 2% milk (scrupulously measured)
Lunch: A Lean Cusine or Healty Choice meal < 300 caleries and < 20% calories from fat amd a diet coke.
Supper: a frozen dinner meeting the same critera
Any snacks: Apples/or oranges
> Yes, it's true that Karen is a little tall (about 6', I guess) and she may > be somewhat "big-boned." But mostly, she's big because she eats too much. > She talks about her 40" ribcage as if these were the bones sticking out. > Well, let me tell you, it's not bones.
You want to feel my ribcage? When I was 220lbs the ribs were sticking out some (for the first time in my life I may add) and i measured 42" around the chest. There was not much fat was left there as I tend to put it on in the stomach and thighs - ALWAY have. Hell even at 360 lbs I had no psuedo breasts that you see on really heavy men!
> If Karen were to get her weight > down into a healthy range for a female her height, her body would look much > better. Maybe not immediately, because obviously she might experience some > problems of loose skin 'till it tightened back up, but ultimately, she'd > look much better.
Been down far enough to know that just ain't so. When I was at that weight I got more stares then I do now.
> Look at her > sitting on a couch, for example, and she's usually got one leg up over the > other, resting an ankle on her knee, guy-style. Her "excuse" is that she > can't cross her legs at the knees like a woman because (how did this > happen?) she's too fat.
I have nver rested my anke on my knee. When I do it's my calf AND with agroup of TS's where I'm not thimking about it.
> When she walks, she carries her shoulders hunched > forward with her arms held close to her body, sort of like a quarterback > sneaking the ball. She seems to make no attempt to mimic the loose, fluid > style of movement you see typical of most women.
I have aa major curvature of the spine. If I can get my Xrays from the hospital I can show it to you. It is PIANFUL for me to walk with ,y shoulders bacl for any length of time.
> Second, she rarely smiles and has this look about her as if she's just > shoplifted something and doesn't want to be caught. She looks guilty! You > can't do that and expect to pass!
That's not because of passing concerns but because I'm feeling bad. I do smile when I'm feeling good.
> Third, her clothing and makeup have all the style and pizzazz of a rummage > sale.
Excuse me bu I COULD say a good bit about your taste in clothes bit i won't stop to that. (You however have had no compunctions about critizing others in the group on that point to me). I have ben complement on by clothing make up and color coordination by numerous people. I happen to work in a chemical laboratory BTW and was critized by some of teh women at first for OVER dressing for that enviorment (simply too dressy).
> Now, I really do appreciate that when you're that big (once again, > how did this happen?), that it must be more difficult to find interesting > clothes.
Nicki If I lost every once of extra weight I would still be in the plus sizes. Also unlike you I can't go into Filenes and buy out theit entire stock of sweaters in my size (have you worn them all yet?)
> But I was struck by Andrea Bennett's suggestion (originally over > in s.s.tg) that Karen should work on these things. So far as I know, I > don't think Andrea's ever seen Karen or would have any other way of knowing > this is a problem, but I'll tell you, it is.
Not in my opinion.
> seems to me that if you are worried enough to complain, it ought tobe
> worth it to you to work on a flattering, professional woman's wardrobe.
For my profession I have. The technical women dress less well then I do in my company!
> Heck, the other day, I was visiting a customer (a big local software > company) and there's everyone all dressed up, including a couple women I > thought had to be even bigger than Karen and they looked great. But the > difference is they were wearing some great clothes; stuff you could put > over a Buick and make it look sexy.
Sexy is not appropriate for the lab. If have no place to wear that type of stuff and it's a bit expensive to decorate my closet with.
> Myth #4. Karen doesn't pass. > And you'd be > wrong! She actually passes just fine.
I have numerous incidents that have nothing to do with behavior cues that show otherwise. And as I said no gg I know personally thinks so.
> never pass all that well. For me, and I suggest, for anyone who's TS, the > reason to transition is so you can be =you=, not so you can pass. And your > measure of success should be how well you =are= you, not whether you pass.
In an ideal world but - but thsi is an ideal world.
> Second, I was willing to do something about it. I was willing to spend > some money and undergo a lot of pain on something that honestly I was not > sure would necessarily improve anything.
You did not have to risk keeping a roof over your head and the head of your spouse to do it. I am certainly willing to undergo the pain. Heck I expected a lot more then I had with SRS and was willing to bare it.
> I was also willing to accept the > consequences of the surgery, which not everyone talks about, namely that my > nose near the septum and the whole top of my head are completely numb, with > no guarantee that sensation will ever return. (This is the inevitable > consequence of the incisions Ousterhout has to make across the nerves.) I > was also willing to accept the risk of possible facial paralysis and other > complications. > or something that just fell on me, it's something I earned. Karen has a > good professional income that many of you would probably die for
And it's only been in the last 5 years that it's gotten there with the bigest part of that comming AFTER transition. In any case it's barely enough to
...
RosePress <rosepr...@aol.com> wrote: > The question, rather, is how well people treat you. Do they act as if > their life is better for having you in it? I get that, even from my 10%. > If they like you, they'll accept you. And isn't it acceptance as yourself > that's important?
People accept me as a TS just fine. It's not enough.
<< We've heard this a number of times from you, Karen, but you have a mistaken impression of what stealth is. It's not a geographical escape, but a willingness to cut loose of all binding ties, forgo all security and familiarity, and build life anew.
At this point in my life I can't do that type of stealth. Woodworking would be the only way.
> It requires a > willingness to start over with little more than native wit and faith > in yourself that you can make it happen. Frankly, with your attitude, > you wouldn't survive a week no matter what you looked like.
I have been a survivor all my life but never let myself care as much about anything as this. You are right that, at this point, I don't have faith that I can make it which is the biggest *internal* problem I have (the external is real as well IMO). It scares the heck out of me.
<< When I went stealth, I worked as a waitress and a hotel chambermaid, which was a bit of a comedown from $50k a year. These were menial, unglamorous jobs. The only saving grace was the wonderful acceptance of the other women I worked with. I don't think anyone knew, but if they did it wouldn't have mattered, since I lived under the same parameters as any other woman.
If I believed I could pass well enough that no on would know (asumming my wife could be taken care of) I truely would not mind starting over to build a life as a woman. I am not afraid of hard work and I am no stranger to low paying jobs.
<< Same low wages, lousy hours and working conditions, but it was pure joy to have women friends who accepted me as another woman.
I have only felt that type of acceptance for a very brief period but it is something I will never forget. << You continue to bemoan your fate, which from what I can tell is pretty good compared to the circumstances of many transsexual and genetic women.
Better the some and worst then others - both TS's and genetic women. << You had your surgey paid for, which many of us don't get, you've managed to continue in your career and marriage. If that's falling apart, it's no one else's fault but your own.
On that I agree.
<< Instead of working very hard to secure the foundations of what you do have and build upon that, you complain constantly about what hasn't been given to you.
For my body has been my biggest issue for most of my life. The way things have gone I find very difficult to bear. Believe me I would trade the other things for a reasonable body and good HRT results.
I believe I have worked hard at it. When things have looked like they would not work I have to admit I backed off out of fear of failure. I know this is self defeating but in a way it's also self protecting. If I pulled out all the stops even though there does not appear to be away to make it work, if it does not I'm left with no possibilities.
I have worked hard but i hit a wall that I honestly belive has a high probability of being unclimable. Finding out for sure would kill me.
<< You come across to me as a very selfish person. You want what you want now, and damn everyone else who's stood beside you through all this. Your wife has remained with you through your SRS, which is exceptional compared to the experience of most TSs, yet you portray her as holding you back.
I've tried to present a balanced picture. In some ways she is and some ways she is supportive nad in some ways she is holding me back. That's how she herself has portayed it. She has said in matters of transition ,she is my worst enemy. << Your employer not only kept you on, but promoted you. What are you doing for either of them? Are you becoming the best spouse and employee you can possibly be, or are they simply adjuncts to the world according to Karen?
I am doing the best I can for her and I always have. Sometimes I'm not sure what that is anymore. << Part of being a woman is an attitude of sharing and caring for others. I see none of that in your posts, it's all about me me me. I wonder if you are even capable of empathy toward others.
Quite a lot actually. I've had sevaeral people at work seek me out to talk about their problems because of it. I only show one side of myself here because I adressing the central issues I'n struggling with internally.
<< The situation of Dawn, and thousands of other TSs like her, is a case in point. There are many in much worse circumstances than you are, but that becomes merely a springboard to launch the latest round of Why Karen Can't Pass. That makes me nauseous.
I had no intention of making that intial post another round of all of that. I was hurting and reacted with no forethought or plan. Please believe me in that at least.
<< In recent posts, we've had complaints about further indignities of having to put money into your car, about how you regret having breast implants, and other absurdities. You could care less about girls selling their bodies on the street just for food and shelter and hormones when they can get them. The problems of anyone else are completely irrelevant to you, because there's no room for compassion or consideration.
Again you don't know me out side of the context of transition and my issues surounding it. Surfice it to say I have heloped more then a few people in my life.
<< Stealth wouldn't do anything at all for you, Karen. You still won't be accepted as a woman by other women, as long as you maintain that your supposed suffering is the only thing that matters.
Right now I am preocuupied with myself, that I admit - but that is not all of who I am. Why do you think my wife is still with me and even my mother in law still likes me? I've not been rejected by any non-TS who knows ne reasonably well. The reason for that is I am decent human being who tries to hurt no one and do the best i can.
My worst fears going into transition about physical changes have been realized. Maybe I'm blowing it out of proportion but it feels like my guts have been ripped out.
<< I know women working two jobs to put food on the table for their kids, because their husbands left them.
I'm the child of such a family I'm well aware of that.
<< I've had friends who've had to hide in women's shelters because a husband or boyfriend is stalking them, waiting for another chance to beat them up again.
I've huddled in terror with my mother as a child while my father broke into the house and procceded to burn her legs with cigarette butts.
<< You haven't even rid yourself of male expectations that the world revolves around you, and you expect to be accepted as a woman?
I don't expect the world to revolve around me and never did. << I don't accept you as living as a woman, nor do I know any who would.
You don't really know me only my fears and insecurites because that's all I've shown online. It has been my outlet for them. << Have you done anything for anyone else, like offering time or money to a women's shelter, or helping out other women in any way you can?
On a personal basis I have done things for women who were down on their luck and have touched my life. Your assumptions are faulty.
<< If you continue with this attitude, Karen, you'll find yourself to be an old and bitter person with no friends.
No TS friends at least. I don't show my fears and insecurites to them.
<< The only one that needs to change is you, and you don't seem to even realize that.
I know soe things need changing but I have lost all believe that the things I really can change can make enough difference. and becaue of it am deathy afraid. That may not make semse but it's what I'm going through right now.
<< Do something for someone else today, purely out of kindness with no expectation in return, and perhaps all this gloom and darkness will begin to lift.
I have done so on many occasions in the past . Lately I've not as all my energy has been consummed this sense of hoplesness and fear I feel. I'm bearly getting through the day and my life has narrowed to home and work. If an opportunity presents istself, I will.
> I seem to remember you realing the same story to me a while back that > you had heard about Julie Haugh before you met her when she realaxed at > night with TS's. Thatwas when you thought she was exuded more masuline > enregy then anyone on the newsgroup and was a guy to the core. Care to > deny that?
Okay, I'll answer that, but only because you mention Julie's name. This was a conversation that took place long, long before I'd met Julie and before I even knew her well. I was struggling to understand some combativeness I saw in her comments at the time. I don't recall precisely, but I think this was probably late winter, a year ago. I recounted some catty remarks told to me by someone who felt she'd just been dissed by Julie but, as you say, I made clear at the time that I had no personal knowledge if they were true. I certainly said nothing of my own opinions that was not totally consistent with my views expressed on-line, all of which are available for review on Deja News. As I got to know Julie better, (she's a very bright and complex person) I grew to like her immensely. I did finally meet Julie for the first time in Dallas this last month and I can say from personal observation that she is stunningly beautiful, engaging and thoroughly feminine woman who dresses and presents impeccably.
> You ceratinly like to gossip about other people.
What can I say? Women do this. :) And my recollection is of you as a willing and, oftentimes, enthusiastic participant in these conversations. But I will disagree with the characterization you imply that any of my remarks were ever said in a malicious manner or in any way as to imply a reduced valuation of these people in my life. Beyond that, I won't comment on the specifics simply because I see no reason to bring them into this.
But I suppose if there is a lesson for anyone to learn, it is that there is no such thing as sharing a confidence with you. You obviously don't mind that there may now be innocent bystanders worrying, gee, are people (even if it's just Nicki and Karen) saying terrible things about me?
Well, if any of them are reading this and think they recognize themselves, let me set their minds at ease: the answer is no. Karen is just being, well, Karen. She's just being a jerk and she doesn't mind using you if it suits her purpose. But no, no one (at least, not me) is saying terrible things about anyone. But if you're still worried and want to know exactly what, if anything, I said about you, send me email and I will tell you, to the best of my recollection. If you like, I'll copy Karen on it so she correct any "inaccuracies" she thinks she's found.
Michelle Steiner <miche...@michelle.org> wrote: > What is the purpose of this message, Nikki?
What is the purpose? Geez, Michelle, I should have imagined it was pretty clear. This is a discussion and support group and I participate pretty fully. I'm getting tired of having every friggin' thread hijacked into a discussion of whether Karen does or does not pass and whether it's because of poor HRT results. It annoyed the hell out of me to see her use Dawn's comments as the latest jumping off point, especially considering all that Dawn has had to go through. It was just unseemly.
But also, contrary to your implication that I'm doing this only to piss Karen off or because I'm pissed off, I do honestly wish Karen would take my comments to heart because I think if she did, she could improve her lot. I appreciate that this does appear to be as pointless as trying to teach a pig to sing, but I dunno, I just gotta try anyway. If I thought you life was circling the bowl and you needed a good knock on the head to wake up, I'd do the same for you, too. :) -- Nicki Hamilton http://www.hamiltonlabs.com/biography.htm
> I don't see anything constructive that could possibly result from your > message.
Actually it has. For my part, it ended any possibility of our making up and having any sort of friendship. I was under the mistaken impression that it might happen with a bit more tine. As far as I can see, it's all for the best anyway.
Unfortunately, it has likely ended my participation in the support group we were both in as she is one of the people who hosts it now. After that post I doubt we could co-exist peacefully in the same room as we manged to last Wednesday.
Nicole Hamilton <hamil...@hamiltonlabs.com> wrote: > nd my recollection is of you as a > willing and, oftentimes, enthusiastic participant in these conversations.
In Julies's case yes. After you mentioned the other pseron I agreed that about her choice of clothing an sruprise at it but I did not make haver thew fun you did in talking about it or initiated it as you did and you set the tone. In the third case I had to explain to why a person in her position would find things so difficult you had no clue. You have often shown your insentivity to others who you percieve to be lacking in "courage".
> But I will disagree with the characterization you imply that any of my > remarks were ever said in a malicious manner or in any way as to imply a > reduced valuation of these people in my life.
They were ceratinly made with an attitude of scorn and/or ridicule. you are not the goodie-two shoes you make yourself out to be.
> I don't say anything about anyone behind their backs I wouldn't be willing > to say to their faces.
Funny how, execpt for me, you don't seem to though.
Nicole Hamilton <hamil...@hamiltonlabs.com> wrote: > But I suppose if there is a lesson for anyone to learn, it is that there is > no such thing as sharing a confidence with you.
I doubt we will be talking together again. Your post pretty much insured that.
> You obviously don't mind > that there may now be innocent bystanders worrying, gee, are people (even > if it's just Nicki and Karen) saying terrible things about me?
I had to let people have some insight into who you really are - particularly as you seem to want to give them your skewd "insight" into me.
> Well, if any of them are reading this and think they recognize themselves, > let me set their minds at ease: the answer is no. Karen is just being, > well, Karen. She's just being a jerk and she doesn't mind using you if it > suits her purpose.
You were a jerk for posting that exaggerated and misleeading description of me and call me liar and you damm well know you did in that post. My diet is not opinion about how I look. The results are backed by objective photographiv evidence of the weight loss that you have seem. I'm still almost 110lbs below my weight before the diet.
> I don't say anything about anyone behind their backs I wouldn't be willing > to say to their faces.
But somehow, except for when you are talking about me, I always here you saying it behind their backs.
> They were ceratinly made with an attitude of scorn and/or > ridicule. you are not the goodie-two shoes you make > yourself out to be.
Karen, you're wrong. But if you want to be a jackass and state here exactly what you believe I said and about whom, I'll respond. But as it stands, these are empty broadsides. You make vague claims I said things in scorn and ridicule; I say I didn't. Off-hand, I don't see your credibility as all that strong right now.
Anyway, how is this is any of this you claim different than your own behavior? In November, when you last got pissed off at me, you sent me a long series of email messages recounting how "everyone" in our local support group agrees I'm insensitive and boorish and whatever else you could think up to insult me and you made a point of listing quite a number specific complaints about me stated to you in private by specific individuals. The difference is, I'm not talking about vague stuff that may or may not have been said in some subjective tone of voice. I have your messages right here on my disk. Shall I post some of that stuff here, blotting out these other people's identifying information just so everyone can get a clear idea of what's going on here? -- Nicki Hamilton http://www.hamiltonlabs.com/biography.htm
Nicole Hamilton <hamil...@hamiltonlabs.com> wrote: > Karen, you're wrong. But if you want to be a jackass and state here > exactly what you believe I said and about whom, I'll respond.
I can't without revealing particulars about people.
> scorn and ridicule; I say I didn't. Off-hand, I don't see your credibility > as all that strong right now.
Because you have lied (orconviently fotgpt some facts) I have been totally honest aboy both my feelings and the facts.
> Anyway, how is this is any of this you claim different than your own > behavior? In November, when you last got pissed off at me, you sent me a > long series of email messages recounting how "everyone" in our local > support group agrees I'm insensitive and boorish and whatever else you > could think up to insult me and you made a point of listing quite a number > specific complaints about me stated to you in private by specific > individuals.
Re-read them. I never said everybody. I'm not that close to everybody in the group. As I stated, it was more then just one others. Again it was to let you know that people don't see you as you see ypurself.
> The difference is, I'm not talking about vague stuff that may > or may not have been said in some subjective tone of voice. I have your > messages right here on my disk. Shall I post some of that stuff here, > blotting out these other people's identifying information just so everyone > can get a clear idea of what's going on here?
If you wish. I stand by everything I said. I could have been more specific but felt it was not my place if they chose not to say anything to your face. You HAVE been very insenitive (though not purposely so).
In article <369C9A8E.BE3C4...@together.net>, Amber Thompson <msfr...@together.net> wrote:
> k...@world.std.com wrote: > - > > BUT that means 1 out of every 10 people reads me. It's impossible to build > > can't the life I want because of it.
> Then don't keep trying.
That's the problem. I can not accept that. I have tried and find that it's too important to me and I can't find a path I believe can make it happen. That's what scares the hell out of me.
> The thing we have been trying to tell you is; > It's how you feel about yourself that counts.
While that's certainly important, it's not the whole story. If it was, why do so many who can woodwork or do stealth choose to do so? We are social creatures and how we are percieved by the society we inhabit does matter a good deal and does affect the quality of life. What the decison to transition boils down to is overall quality of life - and that is something that only can be defined only by the individual and their inner needs.
I seacrhed by soul over years because I knew it would be difficult given my physical makeup but in the end decide I had to try. When it became obvious that things were not working I tried to convince myself I could live with less or different results. Something in me rebelled and almost sent me over the edge.
To me, physical passability is a prerequisite for things to be able to work. When HRT did not give me much fat redistribution I looked for regamines that would make it work and have gone to extreems in that area. In the last 2-3 months I've come to realize that it is now highly unlikely that any combo of HRT will make a real differnce with over all fat redistribution.
With out that, no matter what else I do, I can never have the life I want. And that to me is unacceptable. THAT is what I mean about running out of options. All the other stuff can't get me all the way there and, for me, threr seems little point to it without that possibility.
Maybe I'm totally screwed up (and many here think so), but I am not able to accept that I can't get there and yet I see to way I can. That is causing me my own personal hell. I freely admit it is of my own making for not being able to accept the inevitable and move on. If I had been, I never would have started down this path. The area that I can not get to work is the one that taps into my deepest insecurities and is what stopped me from doing this a decade earlier.
-Karen
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
In article <01be3eb9$e6b75900$0732180c@hamiltonlabs>, "Nicole Hamilton" <hamil...@hamiltonlabs.com> wrote:
> Okay, I'll answer that,
In the name of honesty and fairness let's get something out on the table.
I'm pretty I sured you a picture of me when i was 360lbs if not then you were not at group then. Assuming you have, can you admit that i HAVE lost a tremenous amount weight from that picture. As it stands right nowm, Im at at 250lbs and have been at 220lbs since you've known me.
If you have not seen the pictures and I can arrange to have them shown to you would you be honest enought to admit that I had lost over 100lbs and that is ample evidence of the truth about my dieting in the past?
I am very proud of being able to lose all that weight and go from a waist of about 60inches to the low-mid 40's. Right now I'm 30 lbs less then the weight I was at when I graduated high school, and far below any pervios weight be for that diet in my adult life.
If you have shread of decency, you will not slander and belttle what was, for me, a HUGE accomplishment. You may feel I've not done enough but damm it, at least acknowledge what i did do.
-Karen
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
k...@world.std.com wrote: > That's the problem. I can not accept that. I have tried and find that it's too > important to me and I can't find a path I believe can make it happen. That's > what scares the hell out of me. > ...more of the same....
OK Great - so what do you want from us? Surely the negative feedback from the majority of has must have convinced you that we're all a little tired after a year of this nonsense) of hearing about it?
So what more do you want from us? Why continue this useless whining?
--------- Diane
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
In article <01be3ebb$94ce0a10$0732180c@hamiltonlabs>, "Nicole Hamilton" <hamil...@hamiltonlabs.com> wrote:
>This is a discussion and support group and I participate pretty > fully. I'm getting tired of having every friggin' thread hijacked into a > discussion of whether Karen does or does not pass and whether it's because > of poor HRT results.
Very much seconded.
> I appreciate that this does appear to be as pointless as trying to teach a > pig to sing, but I dunno, I just gotta try anyway.
getting people to try to help her is part of the passive-aggressive game she's playing. She will deny such because she is in complete denial as to the source of her problems (herself) and what she's doing about it which of course is nothing more then p/a control games.
Consider the effect that I had when I agreed with everything that she said - she got pissed off because I wasn't playing the game properly. She couldn't get control by negating my siggestions because I wasn't giving her any. At this point I believe that , like an alcoholic, the only one who can get her to change her ways is herself. All I'd like is if she'd just stop playing her stupid game and please just shut up and grow up.
--------- Diane
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
k...@world.std.com wrote: > If you have shread of decency, you will not slander and belttle > what was, for me, a HUGE accomplishment. You may feel I've > not done enough but damm it, at least acknowledge what i did do.
Oh, okay, I see you've posted this also, so I'll just repeat what I said privately:
It =is= a huge accomplishment. Unfortunately, it is not enough. I don't know what doctor told you 180 would be unhealthy for you, but he's wrong and you've just latched onto that as an excuse. You need to drop at least 70 pounds from where you are, to get you at least to 180, and you need to start some regular exercise. Fat redistribution, body definition, whatever you want to call it, is never, never going to come out of a needle for anyone. You have to lose the weight and you have to train your body to put what's left where you want it through exercise.
You might also consider whether something like may, I dunno, dance classes or even a modeling school (yes! really! one friend tells me she really did go to modeling school during transition and it helped a lot) would help you modify your behavior, the way you move. There's just no delicacy at all to your movement, how you walk, how you sit. Take that snapshot I took of you last week when I was playing with my digital camera at group. I hadn't even looked at it 'till last night but there you are, slouched back on the couch, more as if you're lying there than sitting, sweater sort of astray off one shoulder. You look like a mess, which is what you always look like.
Once again, I don't hold myself up as some great example. I'm about as casual as they get! Everyone knows I dress like my only charge account is at Goodwill. But I'm not the one complaining that my life is so bad.
The only things I see you willing to do are the things you know you won't have to do, e.g., because they're beyond your means, like Ousterhout. But there are other things, like getting your weight down, getting some exercise, smiling, practicing how you walk and how you sit and how you wear your clothes, and just generally expressing more interest in other people as something other than a jumping off point to how miserable you are that would cost you nothing.
Btw, the issue on your clothing is you are going to have to learn to pick clothes that have more shape to make up for the lack of that in your body. Instead of soft pastel dresses and shapeless cardigan sweaters, you should be looking at fabrics with more texture that'll take a pleat or crease. You're going to look better in more serious clothing, e.g., grey wools and stuff like that. A flimsy dress looks great on some 17-yo waif of a girl but terrible on you. -- Nicki Hamilton http://www.hamiltonlabs.com/biography.htm
If the first anti-depressant you take doesn't help-try another til you find one that does and maybe consider adding a mood stabilizer as well.
You said you came from an alcoholic home and the incidence of mood disorders in families with alcoholism is common.
If your shape is such a problem to you: a) wear a fredericks padded girdle b) learn to dress to camouflage your shape c) have a few ribs removed d) risk your life and get your hips shot up with silicone (not a good option) e)if you rib cage is large-don't get overly large implants.
Looking good isn't the total answer to stealth and happiness. A nice looking ts is even juicier gossip when someone blabs or out-right figures it out--and it can set off homophobic responses from men who may have found you attractive.
I find support groups are of no benefit to me and the last thing I personally need is to hang out with plastic surgery junkies, because it can make my insecurities get real outta hand.
Fix the unacceptable as best you can and find things in life that make you feel good and don't participate in the beauty pageant if it makes you miserable. HINT: GG's don't go out accessing percentages of times they get read---someone counting must look like a lunatic and probably does arouse suspicion. When people say rude comments --that I have some feature like a man--I find that if I look them straight in the eye and say something to them acknowledging that I'm a human being and not an object---they treat me as such.
WendyX <spam_on_to...@webtv.net> wrote: > ... the last thing I personally need is to hang out with > plastic surgery junkies, because it can make my > insecurities get real outta hand.
This is perhaps yet another follow-up to your anger at Schrang for wanting to do SRS in two stages and at life in general because some are more fortunate than others? Anyway, it's all relative, don't you think? In the eyes of most of the world, don't you imagine we're =all= plastic surgery junkies for what we do? -- Nicki Hamilton http://www.hamiltonlabs.com/biography.htm
diane_ar...@my-dejanews.com wrote: > Consider the effect that I had when I agreed with everything > that she said - she got pissed off because I wasn't playing > the game properly.
And you saw it was the same thing when I stepped "outside the script" to point out, however politically incorrect, that she's fat because she eats too much and doesn't always get seen as female because she acts like a guy in drag. At that point, the response is to get nasty and want to shift the discussion to all of my own real or imagined flaws.
My point is that Karen enjoys using the group very selfishly, fully expecting it's her right to abuse it any she likes but that all the rest of us will carefully shy away from the mentioning her weight and appearance, things you normally would never say anything about out of politeness and social convention.
Well, too bad. This is a support group, not a ladies' tea social, meaning you're supposed to get better here and you're expected to be able care enough about doing that that you'll do some of your own heavy lifting. It's not just some place to go moan and whine but not do a little work. -- Nicki Hamilton http://www.hamiltonlabs.com/biography.htm