Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Uruguay approves sex change bill

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Inconsequential

unread,
Oct 15, 2009, 7:03:28 PM10/15/09
to
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/8304123.stm

Jennifer Usher

unread,
Oct 17, 2009, 5:36:52 PM10/17/09
to

"Inconsequential" <m...@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:hb89nb$n14$1...@aioe.org...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/8304123.stm

This is an interesting article, but it really has less to do with
transsexuals than it does with those who are "transgender." Apparently,
this law does not require actual surgery to change a birth certificate, so
the changes are meaningless.

I especially find it interesting that they require a five year waiting
period before one can change it again.

--
Jennifer Usher

Ruby

unread,
Oct 20, 2009, 4:09:10 PM10/20/09
to
Jennifer Usher wrote:
> "Inconsequential" <m...@privacy.net> wrote in message
> news:hb89nb$n14$1...@aioe.org...
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/8304123.stm
>
> This is an interesting article, but it really has less to do with
> transsexuals than it does with those who are "transgender." Apparently,
> this law does not require actual surgery to change a
> birth certificate, so the changes are meaningless.

This is becoming commonplace. Spain has already passed a similar law. They
too do not use the term "transgender" but refer to all trans people as
"transsexual".

Ruby


Jennifer Usher

unread,
Oct 21, 2009, 12:18:59 AM10/21/09
to

"Ruby" <ru...@qwest.net> wrote in message
news:hbl5cu$14u$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

Yes, several countries allow such changes. And a few people in the U.S.
have managed to con judges into making changes without having had full
surgery. Of course, in the U.S. anyone doing so would face possible fraud
charges. I doubt that will stop them, but it could cause major problems if
they ever get caught.

--
Jennifer Usher

fluffybunnie

unread,
Oct 21, 2009, 6:15:16 PM10/21/09
to
Talking to himself yet again, Lardo barfed:
> On 2009-10-21, Lardo, desperately hoping to "prove" that he is not
> alone here used his sockpuppet "Ruby" <ru...@qwest.net> to spew
> forth (in message news:hbl5cu$14u$1...@news.eternal-september.org)...

>>
>> This is becoming commonplace. Spain has already passed a similar law. They
>> too do not use the term "transgender" but refer to all trans people as
>> "transsexual".
>
> Yes, several countries allow such changes. And a few people in the U.S.
> have managed to con judges into making changes without having had full
> surgery. Of course, in the U.S. anyone doing so would face possible fraud
> charges. I doubt that will stop them, but it could cause major problems if
> they ever get caught.
>

ROFL!
So not only do you not understand transsexualism, you also clearly
don't understand the role of judges in our legal system.

--
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")

0 new messages