This week @ transboutique # 16
Barbie
Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, RSS
facebook.com/transboutique
twitter.com/transboutique
http://transboutique.com/backend/transboutique.rss
Generational shift
http://transboutique.com/article.php?story=20100423224258847
Old ideas die hard - but they DO die There's a reason it takes a generation
for things to really change - enough of the old generation has to die off.
This may sound harsh, but it's a reality of life. Many people cannot
overcome their moral and ethical "blind spots", or willfully choose to
indulge in retrograde acts while the res of society continues to evolve.
TS/TV/CD/LGBT News and opinion from around the world for Friday April 23rd
2010
http://transboutique.com/article.php?story=20100423105729967
What Is Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (AIS)? What Causes Androgen
Insensitivity Syndrome?
Emerging issues in domestic/family violence research
State Supreme Court strikes down aid to religious school
Gay, straight, or bi? Either way, she's questioning
TheCall Uganda: Anti-Gay American Evangelical Going to Inflame Hate in
Uganda
Shared Bathrooms - An Immodest Proposal
Teenagers kicked gay victim with spiked stiletto heels, court told
TS/TV/CD/LGBT News and opinion from around the world for Thursday April 21st
2010
http://transboutique.com/article.php?story=20100422122406292
July retrial set for former officer charged with beating transgender
prisoner
Support group 'illumenates' local gay men
VU eyes balance on gay talks
Prejudices sometimes affect care of gays, lesbian, transgender and
intersexual victims of violent crimes
Transgender fight takes shape
Office of Student Life Develops Gender-Neutral Housing Policy
Cuts threaten SF transgender employment initiative
Former McDonnell brother-in-law speaks at gay-rights rally
TS/TV/CD/LGBT News and opinion from around the world for Wednesday April
21st 2010
http://transboutique.com/article.php?story=2010042110341425
Rainbow flag flown higher after vandalism at Bridgewater church
Wife wonders how to address husband's choice of clothes
Changes to sex-ed curriculum raise ire of family groups
Gay groups scrutinize women's basketball coach's comments
Fed rules put Mesa partner registry on hold
Gay, lesbian group to hold vigil tonight for transgender murder victim
Some social conservatives may sit out election
10 gender bending celebs
Patrick makes pitch for transgender bill
Mississippi Safe Schools Coalition Announces Details of Second Chance Prom
By his senior year in high school in 2006, he knew he was meant to be a man.
College of Staten Island Builds Unisex Bathrooms
Jacksonville councilman Clay Yarborough takes turn at answering questions
Iowa Family Policy Center received over $3 million in federal funds
Christian group says gay marriage more dangerous than smoking
Did Vic Toews kill the HIV vaccine facility?
Iranian actress appeals against UK Home Office deportation decision
TS/TV/CD/LGBT News and opinion from around the world for Tuesday April 20th
2010
http://transboutique.com/article.php?story=20100420110157726
Divorce Dilemma: Texas Says Gays Can't Get Divorce
Mistrial declared in police beating case involving transgender prisoner
Reaction To Judge’s Decision In Transgender Beating Case
Identity explored during LGBT event
Sex history queries should be sensitive
Is Defense Dept. Blocking DADT Vote?
Questions and Answers with Attorney Elizabeth Schwartz
Know Your Rights
How to Talk to a Gay Republican (If You Must)
Exploiting Day of Silence
Indian professor found dead following witchhunt
Supreme Court could hear anti-gay flyer case
TS/TV/CD/LGBT News and opinion from around the world for Monday April 19th
2010
http://transboutique.com/article.php?story=20100419112237220
Aussie Olympian announces he’s gay
Court to hear arguments on campus Christian group
Oscar-winning actress Gwyneth Paltrow has pulled out of her latest movie
– so she can spend more time with her family.
Identity explored during LGBT event
Advocates for Equality silently protest on Dede Plaza Friday
If You Go…
College of Staten Island making some restrooms gender neutral
School board grapples with controversial sex, safety, rights document
Carol Boltz: Straight To The Point
Canadian Human Rights Commission closes Toronto, Vancouver, Halifax offices
How the gay card was played at the Dixie Landers trial
Gay rights will provoke civil unrest, says phobic counsellor
TS/TV/CD/LGBT News and opinion from around the world for Sunday April 18th
2010
http://transboutique.com/article.php?story=20100418104608137
Birmingham city schools ban gay bullying
Anti-gay hate crimes persist, advocates say
The sound of silence
Silent message: West High students protest bullying of LGBT youth
GLBT couples spell out legal protections
How do LGBT people fare in the area?
Ruby-Sachs: Obama Gay Visitation Directive Restating the Obvious
Park City passes anti-discrimination ordinance
Labour under fire as LGBT manifesto ignores marriage equality
India hosts International ‘Queer’ Film Festival
Finding a Gay-Friendly Campus
The Unasked Question
TS/TV/CD/LGBT News and opinion from around the world for Saturday April 17th
2010
http://transboutique.com/article.php?story=20100417112735528
Federal Jury in Memphis Transgender Beating Case Deadlocked
Transsexuals in Kuwait: Criminals or victims?
Judge strikes down adoption ban
Marc Jacobs Is the Best Thing Ever to Happen for Gay Liberation
Will the Governor-General argue on behalf of gays in Africa?
US report paints grim picture of gay life in Zimbabwe
Police issue web warning following hate crime attack
"Coming out must be a positive experience", stresses Gareth Thomas
"Coming out to America was difficult," says basketball star John Amaechi
About TransBoutique: transboutique.com is a transgender/transsexual support
forum that is also dedicated to educating the general public on issues
regarding gender roles and identities, to supportive discussions of people
who find they don't fit in the "binary gender model", as well as a place
where their friends, family, co-workers, teachers, parents, spouses, and
children and ask questions and hopefully find a few answers.
transboutique.com is powered by your story submissions and comments.
Jennifer Usher
"Barbie" <bar...@transboutique.com> wrote in message
news:hqtr9a$kb8$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> Generational shift
> http://transboutique.com/article.php?story=20100423224258847
> Old ideas die hard - but they DO die There's a reason it takes a
> generation
> for things to really change - enough of the old generation has to die off.
> This may sound harsh, but it's a reality of life. Many people cannot
> overcome their moral and ethical "blind spots", or willfully choose to
> indulge in retrograde acts while the res of society continues to evolve.
What a complete load of crap. Wishful thinking on the part of a
transvestite who expects the world to conform to his delusions. He wants to
rebel against public order, but he wants to accuse those who object of
having moral blind spots. Truly bizarre.
Things are shifting again. Obama went too radical, way too fast, and now
things are moving back to the right.
Beyond that, transvestitebuttique remains boring, and mostly just reposts of
news from a mailing list on Yahoo.
--
Jennifer Usher
Barbie
> Sorry, but I fear you are a bit ignorant of the facts. Willy Boy was
> booted from Transvestiteboutique,
Usher claimed this, just like Usher claimed that Usher was going to sue me.
Neither statement is true.
Also, it's funny how Usher continues to confuse transboutique.com with
Usher's favourite shopping site - transvestiteboutique.com - a site devoted
to selling stuff to cross-dressers. Must be that freudian slip thing ...
Until next week ...
Jennifer Usher
"Barbie" <bar...@transboutique.com> wrote in message
news:hrg9i5$lqq$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> Jennifer Usher continues to push the same lies:
>
>> Sorry, but I fear you are a bit ignorant of the facts. Willy Boy was
>> booted from Transvestiteboutique,
>
> Usher claimed this, just like Usher claimed that Usher was going to sue
> me.
> Neither statement is true.
Hmmm, I believe the facts speak for themselves.
ROTFL! I never said I was going to sue him. I objected to him using
copyrighted material. Given that he is in Canada, it is not worth the
bother. Obviously, Canadian ISPs have no respect for copyright law, and the
appropriate U.S. laws, which would have forced him to remove the material in
question, are not applicable there. But it was fun watching him bluster and
posture for a few days.
> Also, it's funny how Usher continues to confuse transboutique.com with
> Usher's favourite shopping site - transvestiteboutique.com - a site
> devoted
> to selling stuff to cross-dressers. Must be that freudian slip thing ...
Good grief....nope, no confusion at all. Satire is wasted on an idiot like
the empty headed faux woman. Now, the curious thing here is, I have never
heard of "transvestiteboutique.com." I simply, shall we say, corrected the
name to more accurately reflect what it really is. But, the empty headed
faux woman apparently is very familiar with said site. Now, I would have no
reason to go there.
Mr. Hudson, on the other hand, clearly knows all about the site....
--
Jennifer Usher
Barbie
> ROTFL! I never said I was going to sue him. I objected to him using
> copyrighted material. Given that he is in Canada, it is not worth the
> bother. Obviously, Canadian ISPs have no respect for copyright law, and
> the appropriate U.S. laws, which would have forced him to remove the
> material in question, are not applicable there. But it was fun watching
> him bluster and posture for a few days.
Liar:
http://transboutique.com/article.php?story=20100228110547332
> From: jenni...@gmail.com
> I am going to say this once, and once only. If you immediately remove the
> copyrighted material from your website then this matter will be ended. The
> artwork in question is the image of me from my website. I cannot make that
> any clearer. If you do not remove that, I will proceed with legal action.
> That legal action will be filed in the local district court, as per the
law.
> You will have to agree to that in order to fight the request for removal.
>
> That said, any further contact is not desired. It will become obvious if
> you have removed the copyrighted material. If you do this matter will be
> over. If you wish, instead, to act childish, well you will soon find
> yourself facing very adult consequences.
>
> A word of warning. Don't believe the mythology you have created. You
> really haven't a clue. The silliness that you, and the other idiot trolls
> post is mostly total lies. I could care less, because it is all silliness
> and anyone I might care about knows better. But, if you start believing
the
> stuff you make up, you may be surprised down the road. But hey, on second
> thought, just ignore all that. This might prove to be quite amusing.
>
> Now, as I stated, further contact is not desired. If you persist in
> contacting me at this email address, it will be viewed as harassment and
> will be dealt with accordingly.
>
> Jennifer Usher
It was quite amusing - everyone had a good laugh at your expense. This was,
if I'm not mistaken, the THIRD time you threatened to sue me. You knew from
past experience that I'm in Canada, so your rationalization for not taking
action is irrational. It doesn't take an Einstein (or a Sherlock) to figure
it out. You're a liar. Plain and simple.
JenniferFlusher
>> Now, as I stated, further contact is not desired. If you persist in
>> contacting me at this email address, it will be viewed as harassment and
>> will be dealt with accordingly.
>>
>> Jennifer Usher
>
> It was quite amusing - everyone had a good laugh at your expense. This was,
> if I'm not mistaken, the THIRD time you threatened to sue me. You knew from
> past experience that I'm in Canada, so your rationalization for not taking
> action is irrational. It doesn't take an Einstein (or a Sherlock) to figure
> it out. You're a liar. Plain and simple.
You know, Howard is not so much a liar as a mentally ill man.
Only a mentally ill man would live for 6 years in The Mission Hotel, a
half-way house and homeless shelter for such individuals.
Only a mentally ill man would write 64,000 Usenet posts in a 5 year span.
Only a mentally troubled man would allow himself to go outside without
bathing and smelling awful on a daily basis.
Only a mentally ill man would create sock-puppets , like Ruby, in a
forum that everybody knows about the sock-puppet and then carry on a
conversation with it as if nobody knew.
Only a mentally ill man would go to such great lengths to pretend he is
a woman (or that he has SRS) who is divorced from the trans community
- while all the time writing a blog that deals with Trans issues and
working in a Trans related place like CAPS. Nothing wrong with working
there or blogging about trans things - but doing them while claiming
that he has no contact with the Trans community is simply nuts.
And so on - Howard (his real name) is simply a mentally troubled and
likely mentally ill individual. Thank heaven the City of San Francisco
has placed him into an assisted living facility with a counselor to
help manage his affairs. That's what Client's of The Mission Hotel are
required to have. And it's a good thing or else he'd be on the streets.
Barbie
> Only a mentally ill man would go to such great lengths to pretend he is
> a woman (or that he has SRS) who is divorced from the trans community
> - while all the time writing a blog that deals with Trans issues and
> working in a Trans related place like CAPS. Nothing wrong with working
> there or blogging about trans things - but doing them while claiming
> that he has no contact with the Trans community is simply nuts.
Since Usher claims to have never threatened to sue me, let me make a new
contribution to your fine list.
I'm sure some of you recall how Usher threatened to sue me over proving (in
Ushers' words), "work is hardly a stealth situation" after claiming here for
so long that "at work I'm just a woman."? There's a lot more than that in my
special stash; I've just been patient over the years, giving Usher every
chance to get a clue and stop with the stupidity and insults. Now is
probably as good a time as any to dip into that special archive and add this
new nugget:
Only a mentally ill man would continue to defame someone knowing that they
hold the truth about their (ahem, how *can* I phrase this delicately ...)
"preparations and expectations" before going out on a certain "first date".
You know, the one that led to "a bit of discussion and speculation".
Of course, there's other stuff, too. Maybe I should just auction off the
drives on ebay. Or donate them to science. And really, who except scientists
would care to spend too much time dealing with someone as antisocial as
Usher? The Norman Bates of a.s.srs - every time the pressure builds, out
comes Ruby.
What it boils down to is that a contemptuous liar like Usher continually
defaming me and calling me a liar eventually calls for some sort of
response, if only to show that rude jerks can't bully their betters with
impunity forever, exploiting their forbearance.
Enjoy the rest of the weekend, and have a nice week :-)
JenniferFlusher
>
> Only a mentally ill man would continue to defame someone knowing that they
> hold the truth about their (ahem, how *can* I phrase this delicately ...)
> "preparations and expectations" before going out on a certain "first date".
> You know, the one that led to "a bit of discussion and speculation".
Good heavens - why be coy about it? If you have some embarrassing
emails he he wrote why not just release them in their entirety?
There's only perhaps 4 , maybe 5 people who look at this place so I'm
not sure who you think you're "enticing". If you know something then
just spill it or else it's not real.
> Of course, there's other stuff, too. Maybe I should just auction off the
> drives on ebay. Or donate them to science
WTF? He's a homeless man who cross dresses and is a nutter. Who
exactly do you think is really interested save the 4 or 5 who come here
to mock him.
> What it boils down to is that a contemptuous liar like Usher continually
> defaming me and calling me a liar eventually calls for some sort of
> response,
There's no response you can possibly give to him.
You can't sue him - he's judgment proof as he lives in a shelter for
heaven's sake.
You can't embarrass him because he's nuts and he believes that by
saying something isn't true then everyone else will believe it not to
be true as well. You can release what ever you have and it will make
no difference to him. It will only amuse me and a few others perhaps.
You can't shame him for the same reason.
Believing that Usher feels and thinks like a normal person does and
would react to something the way that a normal person would is not
keeping in touch with the reality of the behaviors that he's displayed
over the years.
There's nothing you can do to him short of doing something immoral.
The fact is in five or six more years he will disappear from the
Netiverse and most everyone's consciousness ,self-destruct and go on to
live the rest of his life as a shut in with increasingly failing health
. He'll die alone shortly thereafter in a Medicaid-paid facility and
that will be the end of him. He weighs 250+ pounds, lives with people
who have an infectious disease rate of over 90% (HIV and HCV) and has
no access to either exercise or healthy food. Five or six years tops
and a major health event will happen that will put him away for ever.
He's only amusing for a few more years and even now he's barely that.
Jennifer Usher
"Barbie" <bar...@transboutique.com> wrote in message
news:hri7a9$5d9$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
What a buffoon. I assumed, incorrectly, that Mr. Hudson's silly little
joke of a web site was hosted on a U.S. server. I responded to his
harassment (and yes, that is exactly what it was) in accordance with U.S.
law. I was wrong about where the site was hosted, and so, it went no where.
I took a a chance, and it did not turn out exactly as I planned. In any
case, once again, Mr. Hudson is exposed as a blustering man, who thinks he
is free to do as he pleases. either way, things worked out.
And no, I don't recall ever threatening to sue him previously. Of course,
things like fact are lost on him. I could be wrong, but I don't recall any
such threats. I suppose it is possible that he read that into what I wrote.
Even here, the threat was not to sue, but to file for an order for him to
remove the material in question. Suing for damages would have been a waste
of time. I doubt he is any more subject to such a suit than Willy Boy, who
is effectively judgment-proof.
--
Jennifer Usher
Jennifer Usher
"Barbie" <bar...@transboutique.com> wrote in message
news:hrijjg$2oe$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> Since Usher claims to have never threatened to sue me, let me make a new
> contribution to your fine list.
What a complete load of crap.
> I'm sure some of you recall how Usher threatened to sue me over proving
> (in
> Ushers' words), "work is hardly a stealth situation" after claiming here
> for
> so long that "at work I'm just a woman."? There's a lot more than that in
> my
> special stash; I've just been patient over the years, giving Usher every
> chance to get a clue and stop with the stupidity and insults. Now is
> probably as good a time as any to dip into that special archive and add
> this
> new nugget:
Mr. Hudson has a vivid imagination.
> Only a mentally ill man would continue to defame someone knowing that they
> hold the truth about their (ahem, how *can* I phrase this delicately ...)
> "preparations and expectations" before going out on a certain "first
> date".
> You know, the one that led to "a bit of discussion and speculation".
Mr. Hudson is a legend in his own mind. Beyond that, he is full of crap
> Of course, there's other stuff, too. Maybe I should just auction off the
> drives on ebay. Or donate them to science. And really, who except
> scientists
> would care to spend too much time dealing with someone as antisocial as
> Usher? The Norman Bates of a.s.srs - every time the pressure builds, out
> comes Ruby.
Sorry, but no, I am not Ruby. Anyone with a shred of intelligence could
figure that out. Of course, that leaves out most here, including Mr.
Hudson, and Mr. Lask.
> What it boils down to is that a contemptuous liar like Usher continually
> defaming me and calling me a liar eventually calls for some sort of
> response, if only to show that rude jerks can't bully their betters with
> impunity forever, exploiting their forbearance.
I have been showing exactly that for some time. But, you and the other
idiot trolls keep right on trying to bully.
> Enjoy the rest of the weekend, and have a nice week :-)
Yes, and keep on fooling yourself....because you are not fooling anyone
else.
--
Jennifer Usher
JenniferFlusher
> I have been showing exactly that for some time. But, you and the other
> idiot trolls keep right on trying to bully.
Well there now you see?
Im Howard's mind it is we who are the bullies and he is the poor victim.
You can't reason with that. You can't scare that and you can't shame
it into going away.
Howard Usher lives with criminals, the mentally ill, drug addicts and
prostitutes in The Mission Hotel - and he believes he is thee just to
save a few dollars. You simply can't tell him otherwise. He even
thinks he's "living well" , his own words.
He's built his own little world which will self-destruct soon enough -
three to six years tops. Then he won't even be a memory.
There will, in our lifetime, always be crazed individuals in the world
and you can't argue or reason with them. They try to waste all of out
time and they try their best to ruin any happiness the rest of us have
- try to bring us down to their unbelievably low level. That's
Howard's world.
The solace we all should take is that each and every one of us here has
friends, family, most of us here have nice jobs. We have clean,
comfortable places to live in nice neighborhoods and, though, none of
us are rich, we are at least comfortable.
Howard has none of those things - none at all. And he is fully aware
of this - though incapable of admitting it to others. That is why he
creates sock puppets to talk to here. That is why he writes on a blog
no one reads about how much of a woman he is and how unreal everyone
else is. That is why he pretends to have had SRS. All that , while
living in an 8x8 room in a City supported halfway-house in one of the
worst slum areas of the city with a case manager looking over his 55
year old shoulder. At some level he's well aware of his life and the
differences between himself and the rest of the world.
There's no need to punish him - he's been living in a friendless,
lonely, hell for the past 6 years.
Ruby
news:hrkaie$lns$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
And you have been for the last 16 at least. You can't bear the thought that
Jennifer has a stable life style that she seems to be happy with.
What slum are you drifting around in now Diane? Did you find a new gay sugar
daddy? Any new diseases?
Ruby
Jennifer Usher
"Ruby" <ru...@qwest.com> wrote in message
news:hrkc7u$6jr$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
> "Diane Lask" <jflu...@imaman.org> wrote in message
> news:hrkaie$lns$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>> On 2010-05-01 23:29:16 -0700, "Jennifer Usher" <jenni...@gmail.com>
>> said:
>
>> There's no need to punish him - he's been living in a friendless, lonely,
>> hell for the past 6 years.
>
> And you have been for the last 16 at least. You can't bear the thought
> that Jennifer has a stable life style that she seems to be happy with.
Lask is a very disturbed man who has been obsessing about one or the other
perceived enemy for a very long time. Blake finally disappeared and Lask
had to find a replacement, which unfortunately is now me.
And no, I am not friendless or lonely. Not by any stretch. But hey, if
that fantasy works for Lask, let him believe it.
> What slum are you drifting around in now Diane? Did you find a new gay
> sugar daddy? Any new diseases?
Sadly, this seems to be the case. I was rather shocked to find out that
Lask had lied for years about how well off he was. It was mostly illusion.
Sad, but such is life.
--
Jennifer Usher
JenniferFlusher
> hat slum are you drifting around in now Diane? Did you find a new gay
> sugar daddy? Any new diseases?
>
Oh - so I'm Diane again am I ? LOL . Whatever
Good heavens Howard. Your dysfunction is remarkable.
The only way you seem to be able to tolerate your own horrible
situation is by imagining that others live worse than you.
Seriously that's not the case. There is not a person here in this
newsgroup, nor has there ever been one - including I think poor old
Laura (now officially Lyle) Blake, who has ever lived in the
conditions you live in now. even Laura / Lyle managed to live
independently and never sunk as low as a half-way house. Somehow she
managed to live outside of the slums and maintain her own apartment
where he lives quietly now.
But you , Howard, oh my! No one here has ever lived that badly.
But feel free to imagine me, Diane or whomever here as you like.
You think you are somehow hurting me by saying the things you have but
you somehow have never caught on to who I am .
I still think that Dianne owns you Howard. You think of her all the
time apparently.
I'm making scallops and rice in my apartment tonight - what are you
making in your kitchen. Oh yeah , that's right - you don't even have a
kitchen. LMAO !!
Barbie
> [blah blah blah]
Mr. Usher has had his say, expressed his opinion about me, often enough and
in no uncertain terms. I'll now I'll do the same.
It's simple, really, Mr. Usher. The only person who still persists in trying
to portray you as being anything other than a 60+ gay transvestite is you.
Now, what follows is just my view, my opinion - others are free agree or
disagree on some points - it's a free world - but you've been playing fast
and loose with the truth for a long time, both with others, and with
yourself.
Back before we all saw the pictures of what you really looked like, I
believed you when you said you passed. Later on, when you said that "work is
hardly a stealth situation", I gave you the benefit of the doubt, figuring
that you were open at your workfare job because of the nature of the job -
not because in your case "life itself is hardly a stealth situation."
So when you said you were going to meet some guy on a first date, and you
were going to bring condoms - and remember, this is while you still claimed
to be a pre-op transsexual and before I saw the pictures - I thought "Well,
I wouldn't just hop into bed with some strange man on a first encounter, but
to each their own, better safe than sorry."
That you were also claiming to be a fundamentalist christian woman was
inconsistent, but I put that down to everyone being fallible. In other
words, even though I am an atheist, I exercised what would be called the
Christian virtue of not being judgmental. A concept that we all now know is
totally alien to you, except when you find it convenient to invoke it to try
to run away from charges of being a lying hypocrite.
After seeing your pictures, the penny dropped. Okay, it was more like a
brick or anvil. I admit it, I was shocked to the core. It was obvious that
you had lied about being passable, so your tirades against Willow were the
worst of hypocrisy - accusing someone of the very thing you are -
unpassable. I put two and two together, and figured out that there were
plenty of other lies. And that you really can't tell the truth, because you
don't want to know the truth, especially about yourself. And that's why you
lash out at everyone else.
But back to that whole "first date" thing. There is no way that a man could
see you on a first encounter and not think "man in a dress" (and it's no
coincidence that this is the same charge that you throw at everyone you
disagree with). Even Ray Charles and Stevie Wonder would be screaming
"Dude!"
And you *know* this. In some tiny corner of what is left of your mind, no
matter how much you shout "I am woman!", you know this is a core truth -
that you are not and never have been a woman, but a gay man. Just like your
father feared. Unfortunately, the thought fills you with absolute self-
loathing and horror. It's why your personal history "evolved" (and I use
that term with tongue firmly planted in cheek) from "transvestite" to "more
than a transvestite, less than a transsexual" to "transsexual" to "true
transsexual" to "harry benjamin syndrome". Anything to avoid confronting the
truth. And you did this all on your own. Nobody guided you.
You claim this is all valid - and yet you throw rocks at Willow who, with
the help of a therapist, faced up to her own transsexuality. You have a
back-story that is unbelievable, and you have the gall to challenge others'
legitimacy. You do this because you are jealous - confronted with a
legitimate example of what you claim to be, you have to tear it down, or
face the fact that you don't measure up. Willow's very existence eats at
you.
But back to you. You live in absolute fear that people see you as a man. You
fear it so much that, in your mind, accusing transsexual women of being
"men" or "men in dresses" or "transvestites" should be the ultimate curse
that totally crushes us, while directing attention away from you - and away
from the fact that you are indeed really the man in a dress, the gay
transvestite.
It's obvious that you are covering up or projecting when you label everyone
who disagrees with you a man. Example - It doesn't matter how my family,
friends, doctors and the government address me. It doesn't matter that my
story never changed. In the warped world of Mr.Uusher, the homeless man
staying in a shelter and doing workfare, he is better qualified to pass
judgment than either the government or medical doctors. The government
addresses me as Madame Hudson, but Mr. Usher knows better than any
government bureaucrat! That's some tin-foil hat you must be wearing, Mr.
Usher. Loosen it - it's too tight - it's preventing oxygen from getting to
what's left of your brain!
Before anyone gets the wrong impressions, let me clearly state that there's
nothing wrong with being gay, and there's nothing wrong with being a cross-
dresser, and there's nothing wrong with being a transvestite. There's
something seriously wrong, though, when you hate yourself so much for being
one that you accuse anyone and everyone who sees through you of being what
you fear the most.
And to be equally clear on whether I think it's important that transsexual
women "pass", appearances shouldn't matter. Yes, there are m2f transsexuals
who don't pass, and yet they're accepted by the community and much of
society as women, simply because they don't go around pissing on everyone
they meet trying to be the alpha male dog; they are just nice people with a
problem, and most everyone wants to help them, accept them, and do the right
thing by them, because they are particularly vulnerable. People can
empathize with them.
They can't empathize with you, Mr. Usher. You are obnoxious in the extreme,
judgmental, hypocritical, and the smell of your flop sweat comes across with
your every denial.
But back to that first date ...
I had assumed you were going to meet up with a heterosexual male, because I
had assumed you looked like a woman. My bad.
We've seen the pictures. You keep saying that they're just "not the most
flattering" - and yet you never post others. You have a web cam. If a
picture speaks 1,000 words, the lack of a picture speaks 100,000. Saying
they're not flattering is like saying "the Titanic was slightly delayed."
You can't gloss over a disaster so bad that even Photoshop can't salvage it.
You *know* you don't pass as a woman. You know that people who pretend you
do are only doing so because they're being polite. Or it's part of their
job. Or they don't want to create waves. Or have you cause a scene. Or they
want you to pay for your stuff and just leave so they can share a good laugh
behind your back.
Or, in the case of other gay men, because they're looking for some guy-on-
guy action.
To bring condoms to a first meeting under such circumstances - knowing that
you will be clocked as a man in a dress - means you're prepared for, even
anticipating, having sex with someone who quite simply sees you as a man. Or
more accurately, a man in drag. He might call you "girl" and "honey", but
you know he says that to all the queens he tries to hook up with. He's still
a gay man looking for some gay bootie. Or, to paraphrase Fletcher from
"Liar, Liar", he's just looking to ride your gay ass like Seattle Slew.
Of course, that's just my opinion, and my interpretation. But why would you
bring condoms on a first meeting with someone you don't know, when you don't
pass as a woman? Straight men aren't going to want to "make a connection"
with you, especially on a first date (no, beer-bottom goggles won't help,
Mr. Usher - they'll pass out first). Under those circumstances, why would
you expect anyone to see the whole adventure as anything other than a
transvestite looking for some quickie gay sex?
It also helps, in some small way, to explain why you hate Diane so much. She
really had you figured out. She had seen you, knew you didn't pass, knew
that any sex you tried to arrange would have to be with gay men who want to
get it on with other men, not women, and that you're seriously into denial.
But worse, you're jealous of Diane. She made it. You failed. She's accepted.
You're not. Men see her as a woman. Unlike how they see you. She got on with
her life. You can't - ever. You don't have what it takes. Your current life
- living in the Mission Hotel homeless refuge - is as good as it will ever
get. So you're intensely jealous of her - to the point that you see her
everywhere. No wonder you take every opportunity to knock her - she's
everything you could never be, and a constant reminder that, yes, it is
possible to do better.
But you'll deny you're jealous of her. You'll go "but Diane this ..." and
"Diane that ..." and throw in a few nasty names. And we'll all have yet
another laugh at the gay 60+ transvestite who thinks he's fooling anyone
with his pretend "harry benjamin girl true transsexual status." Maybe next
iteration you'll even have a secret handshake and a decoder ring ... it
still won't change the fact that you are an aging gay transvestite.
You're not just jealous of Diane ... no sir, Mr. Usher! Look at how you
attack people who, unlike you, are open about their cross-dressing. Are
willing to go beyond the traditional 2-gender binary. They scare the bejesus
out of you, because they can be cross-dressers and still be happy with who
they are. How dare they! They should be as filled with self-hatred just as
you are! Have they no shame!
But they're okay with themselves, so you attack them, because they remind
you of what you really are - and we see how much you loath what you are. You
denigrate them at every opportunity. You do this to draw attention away from
yourself, because you hope that anyone looking will think "Why would a
cross-dresser attack other cross-dressers? Nobody could be that
hypocritical!"
But you are. That's because you're "special". The rules don't apply to you!
You make them up as you go along, just like you constantly re-invented who
you "really are". From transvestite porn writer to more than a transvestite
to transsexual to true transsexual to chaneling the spirit of harry
benjamin, you pile lie upon lie. And it's somehow okay for you to do this,
because you're "special."
You got that right, porkchop ... you really *are* special. But not in the
way you think. You will never graduate from the Mission Hotel. You convince
yourself that you like it there for a reason. That it's the "logical"
choice. But that's not the real reason - that's just your rationalization,
an excuse to avoid admitting the reality - that the Mission Hotel is your
personal Hotel California, and that even if you did check out, you will
never leave it behind.
Most people in your situation would find someone else to split the cost of a
decent, safer place. A place where they could own a TV, or a cat. A place
that doesn't have so many crack-heads around. Cleaner. Safer. A bit of self-
respect.
There are two problems with that approach. You can't "go halves" with a
transsexual woman. No self-respecting woman wants to worry about some fat
smelly gay transvestite pawing through her clothes and stretching them all
out of shape (but you already know this from past experience). And you can't
"go halves" with another gay transvestite because that would mean you'd have
to admit you're not a woman, trans or otherwise.
Some have expressed the opinion that you are mentally ill. I have to agree
with them - that, while you *do* know right from wrong, you have some pretty
deep issues. You claim that your life is good, while living in the Vice
Hotel, where even the crackheads who live there admit that they've pretty
much hit rock bottom.
Isn't it incredible that even the crack-heads and alcoholics you live with
are better able to assess their personal situation than you are? And yet,
for you the light-bulb still doesn't go on - because you keep pushing
reality away - otherwise, you'd have to admit that the reason your life is a
failure is because you couldn't bring yourself to admit that you're gay, and
instead spent a couple of decades finding any and every way to not deal
directly with it.
You even changed your legal name and gender expression so many times that a
judge finally balked at it. This is not a sign of someone who is sure of who
they are, but it makes sense for someone who keeps trying, and failing, to
erect a false "femme" identity as a way to avoid dealing with their feelings
of shame for being attracted to other men.
The future is equally grim for you, Mr. Usher. In another few years, you
will be on social security. What happens then? Are you, like the
cockroaches, a permanent Mission Hotel denizen? Or will they give you the
boot? I don't know - but I'm sure you'll still be posting about how good
life is for a wannabe "transsexual" living in abject poverty, and how nobody
else is a "true transsexual", even if you have to do it from inside a
cardboard box under the nearest highway overpass.
Because that's the grim reality of your life. That's what you are. A
wannabe. A poseur. A fake. A phony. A joke.
SRS - whether you had it or not, changes nothing. Either way, you're still a
lying gay transvestite bully full of self-hatred, shame, and denial. Surgery
would just make you a transvestite who went too far, because what's between
the ears hasn't changed. You might be some sort of ersatz "pseudo-
transsexual", but you'll never be a woman, because your brain is 100% gay
male. It's why you're in conflict with everyone here. And unlike most gay
men, you hate transsexuals because we have three things you'll never have:
Legitimacy.
Peace with who we are.
Social acceptance.
And because we know, and are certain, of who we are, we can afford to
empathize with lesbians, gays, other transsexuals, cross-dressers,
transvestites, transgenders, straights, bisexuals, gender-f'd - they don't
threaten our self-image. We don't need to create some weird fantasy "trans-
hierarchy" like you do.
I've already said you're a wannabe, poser, fake, phony, and a joke, but I've
saved the worst for last.
You're a tragedy writ small.
Hubris is lost on you. You have gone out of your way to hurt lots of people.
You have caused at least one transwoman who used to post here to stumble in
her path. She has gone through several more years of self-denial and hell
because of you and your lying, hating, hypocritical mouth. I might be an
atheist, but even I would say "lord knows how many others you've hurt".
You are the most contemptible bully I have ever had the misfortune to
encounter. I'll go further - you are beneath contempt - your existence is
just wrong. An aberration in the social fabric. A defect in the universe.
You're what happens when enough bad karma is collected in one person - you
are your own singularity, your own black hole of self-hate. Nobody wants to
catch your "Usher Cooties."
Like the Titanic, you are a lesson in "There but for the grace of god". You
are a pitiful little man who tries to beat up on women to justify his own
existence. And like a true coward, when you are called out on it, you claim
that you're the victim.
You claim your father beat you, and yet you say you are justified in
perpetuating the cycle of abuse, and extending it well beyond anything he
ever did, because "you will not be bullied". His excuse was ignorance -
trying to "beat the gay" out of you. Times have changed. You have no excuse.
Like all men who abuse women, words cannot describe how truly ugly you are.
You can't piss all over people and then say "don't bully me" when they put
you in your place.
You deserve your life, you little man.
You've had your say, expressing your opinions - and now I've done the same.
Some others here may disagree on some or all of the points, and that's their
right. I'll respect their opinions. I won't respect yours, because you have
repeatedly shown that can't even respect yourself.
Jennifer Usher
"Barbie" <bar...@transboutique.com> wrote in message
news:hrl5rh$bu0$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> Jennifer Usher wrote:
>
>> [blah blah blah]
>
> Mr. Usher has had his say, expressed his opinion about me, often enough
> and
> in no uncertain terms. I'll now I'll do the same.
Well, Mr. Hudson is certainly entitled to make a fool of himself like anyone
else.
> It's simple, really, Mr. Usher. The only person who still persists in
> trying
> to portray you as being anything other than a 60+ gay transvestite is you.
Of course, given the fact that I am not 60+, gay, or a transvestite would
tend to explain that. And actually, Mr. Hudson should have qualified his
statement by saying the only person here, and even then that would not be
true. But hey, truth is not a major issue for him.
> Now, what follows is just my view, my opinion - others are free agree or
> disagree on some points - it's a free world - but you've been playing fast
> and loose with the truth for a long time, both with others, and with
> yourself.
ROTFL! He says, after already lying about me.
> Back before we all saw the pictures of what you really looked like, I
> believed you when you said you passed. Later on, when you said that "work
> is
> hardly a stealth situation", I gave you the benefit of the doubt, figuring
> that you were open at your workfare job because of the nature of the job -
> not because in your case "life itself is hardly a stealth situation."
No, I am not open at my job, nor is it workfare. Those are two lies
perpetuated, without evidence by a number of people.
> So when you said you were going to meet some guy on a first date, and you
> were going to bring condoms - and remember, this is while you still
> claimed
> to be a pre-op transsexual and before I saw the pictures - I thought
> "Well,
> I wouldn't just hop into bed with some strange man on a first encounter,
> but
> to each their own, better safe than sorry."
Absurd.
> That you were also claiming to be a fundamentalist christian woman was
> inconsistent, but I put that down to everyone being fallible. In other
> words, even though I am an atheist, I exercised what would be called the
> Christian virtue of not being judgmental. A concept that we all now know
> is
> totally alien to you, except when you find it convenient to invoke it to
> try
> to run away from charges of being a lying hypocrite.
No, Mr. Hudson is just a very large ego.
> After seeing your pictures, the penny dropped. Okay, it was more like a
> brick or anvil. I admit it, I was shocked to the core. It was obvious that
> you had lied about being passable, so your tirades against Willow were the
> worst of hypocrisy - accusing someone of the very thing you are -
> unpassable. I put two and two together, and figured out that there were
> plenty of other lies. And that you really can't tell the truth, because
> you
> don't want to know the truth, especially about yourself. And that's why
> you
> lash out at everyone else.
And yet, I pass quite easily. Of course, Mr. Hudson, like most
transvestites, equates passable with being "drop dead gorgeous." I have
never claimed to be a great beauty. But that is lost on a transvestite like
Hudson.
> But back to that whole "first date" thing. There is no way that a man
> could
> see you on a first encounter and not think "man in a dress" (and it's no
> coincidence that this is the same charge that you throw at everyone you
> disagree with). Even Ray Charles and Stevie Wonder would be screaming
> "Dude!"
In Mr. Hudson's imagination.
> And you *know* this. In some tiny corner of what is left of your mind, no
> matter how much you shout "I am woman!", you know this is a core truth -
> that you are not and never have been a woman, but a gay man. Just like
> your
> father feared. Unfortunately, the thought fills you with absolute self-
> loathing and horror. It's why your personal history "evolved" (and I use
> that term with tongue firmly planted in cheek) from "transvestite" to
> "more
> than a transvestite, less than a transsexual" to "transsexual" to "true
> transsexual" to "harry benjamin syndrome". Anything to avoid confronting
> the
> truth. And you did this all on your own. Nobody guided you.
I love how Mr. Hudson tries to tell me what I have experienced. Does he
believe this stuff? I don't know. But, in any case, he is quite ignorant
of facts.
> You claim this is all valid - and yet you throw rocks at Willow who, with
> the help of a therapist, faced up to her own transsexuality. You have a
> back-story that is unbelievable, and you have the gall to challenge
> others'
> legitimacy. You do this because you are jealous - confronted with a
> legitimate example of what you claim to be, you have to tear it down, or
> face the fact that you don't measure up. Willow's very existence eats at
> you.
Now, you want to talk about a changing narrative, Willy Boy is the King. He
was a normal male until he was supposedly raped in a Thai jail. Then a
therapist told him to have a sex change, and he took up that advice. No one
with a shred of intelligence has ever considered Willy Boy to be a
transsexual in any legitimate sense of the word.
> But back to you. You live in absolute fear that people see you as a man.
> You
> fear it so much that, in your mind, accusing transsexual women of being
> "men" or "men in dresses" or "transvestites" should be the ultimate curse
> that totally crushes us, while directing attention away from you - and
> away
> from the fact that you are indeed really the man in a dress, the gay
> transvestite.
In truth, I have been called a man by many here, including Mr. Hudson, and I
have a good laugh over it. Now, he is projecting his own feeling on to me.
Rather amusing, but of little consequence.
> It's obvious that you are covering up or projecting when you label
> everyone
> who disagrees with you a man. Example - It doesn't matter how my family,
> friends, doctors and the government address me. It doesn't matter that my
> story never changed. In the warped world of Mr.Uusher, the homeless man
> staying in a shelter and doing workfare, he is better qualified to pass
> judgment than either the government or medical doctors. The government
> addresses me as Madame Hudson, but Mr. Usher knows better than any
> government bureaucrat! That's some tin-foil hat you must be wearing, Mr.
> Usher. Loosen it - it's too tight - it's preventing oxygen from getting to
> what's left of your brain!
Actually, no, I don't label everyone who disagrees with me as a man. I do
label faux transsexuals, such as Arune, perpetual non-ops like Goat Boy, and
disturbed men who mistakenly had a sex change like Lask, as such. But there
are a number of people who I disagree with who I do not label as men. What
is true is that I do not buy into the transgender myth that one becomes a
woman simply my making that assertion, as Mr. Hudson does.
> Before anyone gets the wrong impressions, let me clearly state that
> there's
> nothing wrong with being gay, and there's nothing wrong with being a
> cross-
> dresser, and there's nothing wrong with being a transvestite. There's
> something seriously wrong, though, when you hate yourself so much for
> being
> one that you accuse anyone and everyone who sees through you of being what
> you fear the most.
No, nothing wrong, but Mr. Hudson likes to use them as an insult...at least
until he catches himself and has to go PC so he can keep his LGBT cred.
> And to be equally clear on whether I think it's important that transsexual
> women "pass", appearances shouldn't matter. Yes, there are m2f
> transsexuals
> who don't pass, and yet they're accepted by the community and much of
> society as women, simply because they don't go around pissing on everyone
> they meet trying to be the alpha male dog; they are just nice people with
> a
> problem, and most everyone wants to help them, accept them, and do the
> right
> thing by them, because they are particularly vulnerable. People can
> empathize with them.
And then there are men like Mr. Hudson, who do.
> They can't empathize with you, Mr. Usher. You are obnoxious in the
> extreme,
> judgmental, hypocritical, and the smell of your flop sweat comes across
> with
> your every denial.
Mr. Hudson seems to think I care what transgender types think about me. As
long as they recognize I am not a part of their group, I have no issue.
> But back to that first date ...
>
> I had assumed you were going to meet up with a heterosexual male, because
> I
> had assumed you looked like a woman. My bad.
>
> We've seen the pictures. You keep saying that they're just "not the most
> flattering" - and yet you never post others. You have a web cam. If a
> picture speaks 1,000 words, the lack of a picture speaks 100,000. Saying
> they're not flattering is like saying "the Titanic was slightly delayed."
> You can't gloss over a disaster so bad that even Photoshop can't salvage
> it.
Actually, other pictures of me have been posted, and dismissed by the idiot
trolls here.
> You *know* you don't pass as a woman. You know that people who pretend you
> do are only doing so because they're being polite. Or it's part of their
> job. Or they don't want to create waves. Or have you cause a scene. Or
> they
> want you to pay for your stuff and just leave so they can share a good
> laugh
> behind your back.
I suspect that Mr. Hudson is projecting again.
> Or, in the case of other gay men, because they're looking for some guy-on-
> guy action.
ROTFL. Mr. Hudson is a classic homophobic TV.
> To bring condoms to a first meeting under such circumstances - knowing
> that
> you will be clocked as a man in a dress - means you're prepared for, even
> anticipating, having sex with someone who quite simply sees you as a man.
> Or
> more accurately, a man in drag. He might call you "girl" and "honey", but
> you know he says that to all the queens he tries to hook up with. He's
> still
> a gay man looking for some gay bootie. Or, to paraphrase Fletcher from
> "Liar, Liar", he's just looking to ride your gay ass like Seattle Slew.
Mr. Hudson is also obviously an idiot. No one, straight or gay, transsexual
or born woman, has sex with a new partner without condoms. Give me a break.
> Of course, that's just my opinion, and my interpretation. But why would
> you
> bring condoms on a first meeting with someone you don't know, when you
> don't
> pass as a woman? Straight men aren't going to want to "make a connection"
> with you, especially on a first date (no, beer-bottom goggles won't help,
> Mr. Usher - they'll pass out first). Under those circumstances, why would
> you expect anyone to see the whole adventure as anything other than a
> transvestite looking for some quickie gay sex?
No, this is Mr. Hudson's absurd fantasy.
> It also helps, in some small way, to explain why you hate Diane so much.
> She
> really had you figured out. She had seen you, knew you didn't pass, knew
> that any sex you tried to arrange would have to be with gay men who want
> to
> get it on with other men, not women, and that you're seriously into
> denial.
ROTFL! I actually hate no one, not even a sicko like Lask. Pity? Yes.
Hate? No.
> But worse, you're jealous of Diane. She made it. You failed. She's
> accepted.
> You're not. Men see her as a woman. Unlike how they see you. She got on
> with
> her life. You can't - ever. You don't have what it takes. Your current
> life
> - living in the Mission Hotel homeless refuge - is as good as it will ever
> get. So you're intensely jealous of her - to the point that you see her
> everywhere. No wonder you take every opportunity to knock her - she's
> everything you could never be, and a constant reminder that, yes, it is
> possible to do better.
Well, they do until they see his botched crotch. Then the illusion ends.
> But you'll deny you're jealous of her. You'll go "but Diane this ..." and
> "Diane that ..." and throw in a few nasty names. And we'll all have yet
> another laugh at the gay 60+ transvestite who thinks he's fooling anyone
> with his pretend "harry benjamin girl true transsexual status." Maybe next
> iteration you'll even have a secret handshake and a decoder ring ... it
> still won't change the fact that you are an aging gay transvestite.
No, I will just speak the truth.
> You're not just jealous of Diane ... no sir, Mr. Usher! Look at how you
> attack people who, unlike you, are open about their cross-dressing. Are
> willing to go beyond the traditional 2-gender binary. They scare the
> bejesus
> out of you, because they can be cross-dressers and still be happy with who
> they are. How dare they! They should be as filled with self-hatred just as
> you are! Have they no shame!
Sorry, but I prefer the 2-gender binary. I oppose the efforts to
deconstruct it.
> But they're okay with themselves, so you attack them, because they remind
> you of what you really are - and we see how much you loath what you are.
> You
> denigrate them at every opportunity. You do this to draw attention away
> from
> yourself, because you hope that anyone looking will think "Why would a
> cross-dresser attack other cross-dressers? Nobody could be that
> hypocritical!"
No, actually I tend to ignore Lask, who obsesses over me. But this is lost
on Mr. Hudson, who is blind to the truth.
> But you are. That's because you're "special". The rules don't apply to
> you!
> You make them up as you go along, just like you constantly re-invented who
> you "really are". From transvestite porn writer to more than a
> transvestite
> to transsexual to true transsexual to chaneling the spirit of harry
> benjamin, you pile lie upon lie. And it's somehow okay for you to do this,
> because you're "special."
No, I just ignore self-serving rules created by idiots like Mr. Hudson.
> You got that right, porkchop ... you really *are* special. But not in the
> way you think. You will never graduate from the Mission Hotel. You
> convince
> yourself that you like it there for a reason. That it's the "logical"
> choice. But that's not the real reason - that's just your rationalization,
> an excuse to avoid admitting the reality - that the Mission Hotel is your
> personal Hotel California, and that even if you did check out, you will
> never leave it behind.
ROTFL!
> Most people in your situation would find someone else to split the cost of
> a
> decent, safer place. A place where they could own a TV, or a cat. A place
> that doesn't have so many crack-heads around. Cleaner. Safer. A bit of
> self-
> respect.
Uh, I guess he means like the TV I am watching, or the two cats I have?
Oh, and did I mention my dog? Yes, two cats and a dog. And many other nice
pleasures. Hardly the hell that he wants to imagine.
> There are two problems with that approach. You can't "go halves" with a
> transsexual woman. No self-respecting woman wants to worry about some fat
> smelly gay transvestite pawing through her clothes and stretching them all
> out of shape (but you already know this from past experience). And you
> can't
> "go halves" with another gay transvestite because that would mean you'd
> have
> to admit you're not a woman, trans or otherwise.
ROTFL!
> Some have expressed the opinion that you are mentally ill. I have to agree
> with them - that, while you *do* know right from wrong, you have some
> pretty
> deep issues. You claim that your life is good, while living in the Vice
> Hotel, where even the crackheads who live there admit that they've pretty
> much hit rock bottom.
I know my situation better than any of the idiots here. That article was a
bad joke. A small amount of truth, and a lot of fantasy.
> Isn't it incredible that even the crack-heads and alcoholics you live with
> are better able to assess their personal situation than you are? And yet,
> for you the light-bulb still doesn't go on - because you keep pushing
> reality away - otherwise, you'd have to admit that the reason your life is
> a
> failure is because you couldn't bring yourself to admit that you're gay,
> and
> instead spent a couple of decades finding any and every way to not deal
> directly with it.
ROTFL!
> You even changed your legal name and gender expression so many times that
> a
> judge finally balked at it. This is not a sign of someone who is sure of
> who
> they are, but it makes sense for someone who keeps trying, and failing, to
> erect a false "femme" identity as a way to avoid dealing with their
> feelings
> of shame for being attracted to other men.
More fantasy.
> The future is equally grim for you, Mr. Usher. In another few years, you
> will be on social security. What happens then? Are you, like the
> cockroaches, a permanent Mission Hotel denizen? Or will they give you the
> boot? I don't know - but I'm sure you'll still be posting about how good
> life is for a wannabe "transsexual" living in abject poverty, and how
> nobody
> else is a "true transsexual", even if you have to do it from inside a
> cardboard box under the nearest highway overpass.
Unlike Mr. Hudson, I have had my surgery. People can lie all they want, but
they cannot change this fact. I pay about a fifth of my income on rent.
That is why I live here. It allows me to spend money on things I do care
about, like visiting my daughter and grandchildren, among other things.
Sorry, but I am not going to order my life because some idiot like Mr.
Hudson thinks he knows something he doesn't.
> Because that's the grim reality of your life. That's what you are. A
> wannabe. A poseur. A fake. A phony. A joke.
Nope, just a woman.
> SRS - whether you had it or not, changes nothing. Either way, you're still
> a
> lying gay transvestite bully full of self-hatred, shame, and denial.
> Surgery
> would just make you a transvestite who went too far, because what's
> between
> the ears hasn't changed. You might be some sort of ersatz "pseudo-
> transsexual", but you'll never be a woman, because your brain is 100% gay
> male. It's why you're in conflict with everyone here. And unlike most gay
> men, you hate transsexuals because we have three things you'll never have:
Ah, now we see who is jealous of who.
> Legitimacy.
> Peace with who we are.
> Social acceptance.
>
> And because we know, and are certain, of who we are, we can afford to
> empathize with lesbians, gays, other transsexuals, cross-dressers,
> transvestites, transgenders, straights, bisexuals, gender-f'd - they don't
> threaten our self-image. We don't need to create some weird fantasy
> "trans-
> hierarchy" like you do.
Actually, many of my friends are gay. Others are lesbian, and many more are
straight. I am even friends with a few who are transsexual, and even know a
few who crossdress. What I don't do is support the transgender agenda,
which seeks to force men into women's space.
> I've already said you're a wannabe, poser, fake, phony, and a joke, but
> I've
> saved the worst for last.
ROTFL!
I suppose Mr. Hudson will tell himself that he has no doubt severely wounded
me. He will believe he has crushed some part of my soul.
Nope. A good laugh perhaps, because I know how false all this is.
I do hope he is not too disappointed.
--
Jennifer Usher
Jennifer Usher
"Helen Detroit" <FutureG...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:3kupt59luvlqrc6cd...@4ax.com...
>>Only a mentally ill man would write 64,000 Usenet posts in a 5 year span.
>
> <thinking thinking thinking>
> That's 35 posts per day. Okay, actually 35.06849315 posts per day.
Actually, that does not remotely take into consideration that many of those
messages were responses to cross posted messages, and each cross post adds
to the number.
>>Only a mentally troubled man would allow himself to go outside without
>>bathing and smelling awful on a daily basis.
>
> Does anybody know for a fact that this is going on? Frankly, I doubt
> that she would go to work smelly, or at least that she would keep her
> job if folks were complaining. On that basis, unless someone can claim
> to be an eye witness, or nose witness, I find the suggestion that
> Jennifer doesn't bathe to be without much substance.
It is totally absurd.
>>Only a mentally ill man would create sock-puppets , like Ruby, in a
>>forum that everybody knows about the sock-puppet and then carry on a
>>conversation with it as if nobody knew.
>
> Mr. Hat?
Anyone with a shred of intelligence can quickly see that I am not Ruby. Of
course, that is a moot point here.
>>Only a mentally ill man would go to such great lengths to pretend he is
>>a woman (or that he has SRS) who is divorced from the trans community
>>- while all the time writing a blog that deals with Trans issues and
>>working in a Trans related place like CAPS. Nothing wrong with working
>>there or blogging about trans things - but doing them while claiming
>>that he has no contact with the Trans community is simply nuts.
>
> I think posting on this newsgroup would constitute contact with the
> trans community.
You see, this is typical of Lask. I disagree with the transgender agenda,
and do not identify as part of the transgender community. I have never said
I have not had contact. And saying CAPS is "trans related" is a stretch.
One research project, which I am not a part of, deals directly with
transgender issues.
>>And so on - Howard (his real name) is simply a mentally troubled and
>>likely mentally ill individual. Thank heaven the City of San Francisco
>>has placed him into an assisted living facility with a counselor to
>>help manage his affairs. That's what Client's of The Mission Hotel are
>>required to have. And it's a good thing or else he'd be on the streets.
Even this is false. I do not live in an assisted living facility (which is
a step down from a nursing home). I rent an apartment that is very
affordable. Counseling is available, but not required for residents here.
I manage my own affairs. Lask, as usual, is simply delusional, or is
possibly describing his own life.
--
Jennifer Usher
JenniferFlusher
> Mr. Usher has had his say, expressed his opinion about me, often enough and
> in no uncertain terms. I'll now I'll do the same.
Lady, when you decide to rant - you do an A+ job !
Brava ... Brava !
An excellent deconstruction . Well written too !
Of course it will be all lost on him but I must say I certainly
appreciate the writing.
JenniferFlusher
<FutureG...@invalid.invalid> said:
> Does anybody know for a fact that this is going on? Frankly, I doubt
> that she would go to work smelly, or at least that she would keep her
> job if folks were complaining. On that basis, unless someone can claim
> to be an eye witness, or nose witness, I find the suggestion that
> Jennifer doesn't bathe to be without much substance.
Presumably he bathes when gong to work . I can only say that when I met
him some years back he smelled like... I don't know how to describe
it ... like bug spray... like someone hadn't washed their hair in a
week. . His clothes were spattered with food spills and his room was
literally ... and I do mean literally ... and visibly crawling with
bugs. His laptop keyboard would make your skin crawl - indescribable.
.
I can only imagine that he cleans up enough to go to work.
I hear there were layoff notices at his university last Friday for 60
days from now.
I wonder .....
JenniferFlusher
Usher" <jenni...@gmail.com> said:
> Even this is false. I do not live in an assisted living facility
> (which is a step down from a nursing home). I rent an apartment that
> is very affordable. Counseling is available, but not required for
> residents here. I manage my own affairs.
As usual , another lie. Whoa - there's a surprise! LOL
The Mission Hotel and the Tenderloin Housing Clinic that houses him
posts the requirements for their Clients right up on the web.
Howard Usher now falls under the Master Lease Program tor "Qualified
Low-Income Working Individuals" that you can find here:
http://www.thclinic.org/content/services/masterlease.php
Note the following :
"Your shelter case manager will provide you with a referral form to
bring to the Tenderloin Housing Clinic. You will also have to provide
proof of your income. If your income is CAAP you cannot be referred
through a shelter."
You can look through the services they offer right there - Renting your
own apartment isn't one of them.
Howard has a case manager, it's right there in the TLC website. All
formerly homeless , low income clients have one to help manage the
affairs they so woefully mismanage on their own
Howard likes to talk as if he rents his own apartment. He doesn't. He
has a subsidized single occupancy room in a homeless shelter and
half-way house run by the Tenderloin Housing Clinic. The apartments
have no kitchens and community bathrooms. He shares those bathrooms on
a daily basis with the crackheads, and other mentally incompetent
people who live there.
But Barb really said it all.
Basically, if the man didn't lie about his life, he'd probably jump off
a building. He lives in a pretty horrible place .
Barbie
> Lady, when you decide to rant - you do an A+ job !
> Brava ... Brava !
>
> An excellent deconstruction . Well written too !
> Of course it will be all lost on him but I must say I certainly
> appreciate the writing.
Thank you, but I can't take all the credit. Usher deserves some for
providing so much material to work with.
He's a good example of the self-hate and denial that the whole "binary
gender" construct can lead to, so it's no coincidence that he absolutely
opposes anyone who want to see society move to a broader, more inclusive
model.
It's to be expected from Mr. Usher, a.k.a. Lady Rice-A-Roni - the other San
Francisco treat.
fluffybunnie
>
>>On 2010-05-01 14:43:39 -0700, Barbie <bar...@transboutique.com> said:
>>
>>Only a mentally troubled man would allow himself to go outside without
>>bathing and smelling awful on a daily basis.
>
>
Yes. I have had the misfortume of first-hand olfactory exerience
on a number of occasions. He doesn't bathe, and rarely does laundry.
--
(\__/)
(=^.^=)
(")_(")
fluffybunnie
*Very* well said, Barbie! One tiny nit to pic, though -- Usher is not
really "little" -- he's about 6'1", weighs around 300 lbs, and has a
head like a giant, misshapen pumpkin. Other than that, everything you
said was 100% accurate.
JenniferFlusher
> to pic, though -- Usher is not
> really "little" -- he's about 6'1", weighs around 300 lbs, and has a
> head like a giant, misshapen pumpkin. Other than that, everything you
> said was 100% accurate.
Pumpkin you say ? ?
I would have described it as more of a giant Idaho potato. Skin
complexion is about the same too.
Usher , well to me at least , looks like a giant cross-dressing Mr.
Potato-Head. Less personable though.
Barbie
> Hudson seems to think I care what transgender types think about me. As
> long as they recognize I am not a part of their group, I have no issue.
How soon they forget ... this is what happens in a culture that refuses to
look beyond the binary gender divide. We end up with people who find it
necessary to continually "re-invent" their past to suppress the shame and
self-hate they feel.
Jennifer Usher (Lady Rice-A-Roni - the "other" San Francisco treat)
describes hooking up for some transgender sex:
"here is a guy who sees me as a woman, who is willing to look beyond my
penis"
source: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.srs/msg/5c58787ebffced47
"That's not to say that the sex isn't wonderful"
source: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.srs/msg/c71798acc4a0a759
"I was the one who made the first real move. I casually mentioned was
looking for a relationship"
source: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.srs/msg/fd03cf3a4813c975
JenniferFlusher
>
> Jennifer Usher (Lady Rice-A-Roni - the "other" San Francisco treat)
> describes hooking up for some transgender sex:
>
> "here is a guy who sees me as a woman, who is willing to look beyond my
> penis"
> source: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.srs/msg/5c58787ebffced47
Thanks for ruining my dinner with that whole "looking beyond Usher's
penis" quote ;(
Jennifer Usher
"Barbie" <bar...@transboutique.com> wrote in message
news:hrmmtr$g5f$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> Thank you, but I can't take all the credit. Usher deserves some for
> providing so much material to work with.
And he wonders why I call him an "idiot troll." I mean really, him and the
others spew silly stuff that is almost entirely a figment of their
imagination, and they really think it is going to bother me? Anyone who
knows me, knows better. And as to anyone else, who cares?
> He's a good example of the self-hate and denial that the whole "binary
> gender" construct can lead to, so it's no coincidence that he absolutely
> opposes anyone who want to see society move to a broader, more inclusive
> model.
Let's see...the binary model works for, what, about 99% of the world's
population? A few kooks, like Mr. Hudson decide that they not only know
better, but that they are going to tell the world that they know better, and
then delude themselves that they actually have a chance in the bad place of
EVER getting society to adapt to their delusions. Oh dear, but that is so
funny.
> It's to be expected from Mr. Usher, a.k.a. Lady Rice-A-Roni - the other
> San
> Francisco treat.
Well, let's see, I will have to give that bit of drivel about a 2. And
that's because I am feeling a bit generous.
--
Jennifer Usher
Barbie
> On 2010-05-03 10:17:50 -0700, fluffybunnie <fluffy...@127.0.0.1> said:
>
>> to pic, though -- Usher is not
>> really "little" -- he's about 6'1", weighs around 300 lbs, and has a
>> head like a giant, misshapen pumpkin. Other than that, everything you
>> said was 100% accurate.
Now you've ruined the Charlie Brown Hallowe'en Special! I'll never be able
to think of the Great Pumpkin again without *that* mental picture... :-(
> Pumpkin you say ? ?
> I would have described it as more of a giant Idaho potato. Skin
> complexion is about the same too.
>
> Usher , well to me at least , looks like a giant cross-dressing Mr.
> Potato-Head. Less personable though.
They both have eyes but will not see ... both of them apparently grow in the
dirt ... which reminds me, I have to throw some old potatoes out tonight.
If we're doing the "What food is Usher", How about Rice-A-Roni. You know,
the "other" San Francisco treat. Neither rice nor macaroni, but some
strange blend that calls San Francisco home.
Bet you can't get the tune out of your head ...
LADY RICE-A-RONI
(to the tune of LADY MARMALADE)
Hey Mister, so Mister, gay Mister, go Mister
Hey Mister, so Mister, gay Mister, go Mister
He met Rice-A-Roni by the Mission Hotel
Struttin' his stuff on the street
He said "Hello, hey Joe,
you wanna give it a go?"
Gitchi gitchi you're my dada
Gitchi gitchi I'm your ho
Fill my gay mangina ah ah
Usher Lady Rice-A-Roni
Voulez-vous coucher avec moi ce soir?
Voulez-vous coucher avec moi?
He stayed in the hall
As Usher prepped up
A quick enema and some grease
Then they hit that dirty sheet
And he banged the skanky freak
Gitchi gitchi you're my dada
Gitchi gitchi I'm your ho
Fill my gay mangina ah ah
Usher Lady Rice-A-Roni
Voulez-vous coucher avec moi ce soir?
Voulez-vous coucher avec moi?
Hey, hey, heyyyyy! Ouch!!!
Seeing that bunghole all puckered and raw
A fistula oozing his cum
Made the savage beast inside
Roar while Usher cried
"More more more!"
Now Usher's at his workfare doing 9 to 5
Living his sad life of lies
But when he turns off to sleep
Back the memories seep
"More, more, more"
Gitchi gitchi you're my dada
Gitchi gitchi I'm your ho
Fill my gay mangina ah ah
He's Usher Lady Rice-A-Roni
Voulez-vous coucher avec moi ce soir?
I'm your San Francisco treat
Voulez-vous coucher avec moi ce soir?
Ask for Usher Lady Rice-A-Roni
Gitchi gitchi you're my dada
Gitchi gitchi I'm your ho
Fill my gay mangina ah ah
Mr. Usher Lady Rice-A-Roni
Voulez-vous coucher avec moi ce soir?
I'm your San Francisco treat
Voulez-vous coucher avec moi ce soir?
Usher Lady Rice-A-Roni
... fade out ...
Jennifer Usher
"Barbie" <bar...@transboutique.com> wrote in message
news:hrntop$g48$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> Jennifer Usher wrote:
>
>> Hudson seems to think I care what transgender types think about me. As
>> long as they recognize I am not a part of their group, I have no issue.
>
> How soon they forget ... this is what happens in a culture that refuses to
> look beyond the binary gender divide. We end up with people who find it
> necessary to continually "re-invent" their past to suppress the shame and
> self-hate they feel.
ROTFL! Too funny,
> Jennifer Usher (Lady Rice-A-Roni - the "other" San Francisco treat)
> describes hooking up for some transgender sex:
You've got to love those homophobic crossdressers like Mr. Hudson.
> "here is a guy who sees me as a woman, who is willing to look beyond my
> penis"
> source:
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.srs/msg/5c58787ebffced47
Yes, I was a bit na�ve then. Suffice to say, I came to my senses fast
enough, and
> "That's not to say that the sex isn't wonderful"
> source:
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.srs/msg/c71798acc4a0a759
I notice that Mr. Hudson did not even provide the full quote...
"That's not to say that the sex isn't wonderful, but then again, that is
really not anyone's business anyway. "
I guess Mr. Hudson does not believe in sex.
> "I was the one who made the first real move. I casually mentioned was
> looking for a relationship"
> source:
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.srs/msg/fd03cf3a4813c975
The really hilarious part is that, if one goes back and reads what I said in
context, it is pretty innocuous. A classic example of the style of an idiot
troll. Ironically, the context was a discussion between Lask and myself.
Several here though he was a transfan and I disagreed. He probably was
moving in that direction, and that did not help the relationship. He turned
out to be someone I was actually not interested in. But, all of this is
lost on a man like Hudson, who has no understanding of how a woman thinks or
reacts. Elaine understood, but Hudson only sees the chance to create an
insult.
Of course all of this is moot. I would be of no interest to a transfan as I
am a post-op. Something else that the other idiot trolls have no
understanding of either.
--
Jennifer Usher
Jennifer Usher
"Helen Detroit" <FutureG...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:2oott5t94bqf802q2...@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 2 May 2010 22:32:29 -0700, JenniferFlusher <jflu...@imaman.org>
> wrote:
>
>>...and his room was
>>literally ... and I do mean literally ... and visibly crawling with
>>bugs. His laptop keyboard would make your skin crawl - indescribable.
>>.
>
> From debugging fortran code, no doubt. har har har!
Heaven's no. It had been years since I wrote any FORTRAN. No, I had a
problem with bedbugs and I was not aware of my rights concerning forcing the
landlord to take care of it. I found out what the law said, forced the
issue, and the problem is long forgotten by all but the idiots here.
--
Jennifer Usher
Jennifer Usher
"Barbie" <bar...@transboutique.com> wrote in message
news:hrnvu0$ij6$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> JenniferFlusher wrote:
>
>> On 2010-05-03 10:17:50 -0700, fluffybunnie <fluffy...@127.0.0.1> said:
>>
>>> to pic, though -- Usher is not
>>> really "little" -- he's about 6'1", weighs around 300 lbs, and has a
>>> head like a giant, misshapen pumpkin. Other than that, everything you
>>> said was 100% accurate.
Well, no, but that doesn't really matter to an idiot troll. Actually, 3
inches less that that, and I have never been that heavy. Overweight, yes,
but not nearly as much as some of the idiots want to make me. I swear, they
want to make me taller, older, and heavier with each go. Of course, they
are just less and less credible.
Still about a 2. A bit out of date on the cultural references, but
otherwise very lame. And unlike Mr. Hudson, I have a vagina. Unlike Goat
Boy and Lask as well, but that another story.
Mr. Hudson, the homophobic transvestite of alt.support.srs.
--
Jennifer Usher
Barbie
> Let's see...the binary model works for, what, about 99% of the world's
> population?
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/02/09/BAGL1BV49N.DTL
> About 13 percent of San Francisco's middle school students and 11 percent
> of high school students self-identified as gay, lesbian, bisexual or
> transgender, according to a district survey.
You don't have a clue, Mr. Usher Lady Rice-A-Roni.
But we already knew that.
And if it were only 1%, that would still be over 3 million people just in
the United States.
But of course, it doesn't matter, because you were never trans-anything. Not
a transvestite (for over a decade), not "more than an transvestite but less
than a transsexual" (which clearly also fails the binary gender model), and
not a transsexual (which we kind of already figured out). And certainly not
"just a woman" - because a woman born with XY chromosomes and a penis is
also not part of the binary gender model.
No, you're none of those. I agree with you. You're not trans-anything.
You're just a gay guy in total denial. Lady Rice-A-Roni, the other San
Francisco treat. Speaking of which - "Sugir".
Barbie
> "Helen Detroit" <FutureG...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
> news:2oott5t94bqf802q2...@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 2 May 2010 22:32:29 -0700, JenniferFlusher <jflu...@imaman.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>...and his room was
>>>literally ... and I do mean literally ... and visibly crawling with
>>>bugs. His laptop keyboard would make your skin crawl - indescribable.
>>>.
>>
>> From debugging fortran code, no doubt. har har har!
>
> Heaven's no. It had been years since I wrote any FORTRAN
You never wrote any production fortran in your life. Then again, you
couldn't even convince people half your age that you were some "1337"
computer whiz kid. If you could write code, you wouldn't have spent all
these years living in a refuge for the homeless.
Jump Usher Jump!
Oh, that's right. Mr. Usher thinks that a bit of basic is "computer hacking"
10 println "Jump Usher"
20 GOTO 10
I keep forgetting that Usher's wetware was never upgraded, just (self)-
degraded.
Barbie
> A bit out of date on the cultural references
Lady Marmalade "a bit out of date"? It was less than 10 years ago that
Moulin Rouge won several Oscars and Golden Globes. It included a cover of
Lady Marmalade by, among others, Christina Aguilera and Pink.
It also became the most successful airplay-only single in US history. Hardly
out of date.
I'm sure the public will be disappointed to know that Christina Aguilera and
Pink are now no longer to be considered part of popular culture, because
some fat old gay man who pretends to be a woman and lives in a homeless
hostel says so.
Do you even know what century it is, Mr. Usher Lady Rice-A-Roni? Or did time
stop when your old man caught you masturbating to pictures of men in Sports
Illustrated and threatened to beat the gay out of you?
FYI, Christina is 29 years old, and ranked #58 on Rolling Stones all-time
greatest singers, and she's the youngest on the list. She has an album
coming out next month.
Pink? She's a year older, and billboard puts her at the #1 pop artist of the
decade 2000-2009. Last year she was the 6th-highest paid artist.
No, the only one out of date is you - you stopped growing up back in the
'70s.
Jennifer Usher
"Barbie" <bar...@transboutique.com> wrote in message
news:hro1s0$l2b$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> You never wrote any production fortran in your life. Then again, you
> couldn't even convince people half your age that you were some "1337"
> computer whiz kid. If you could write code, you wouldn't have spent all
> these years living in a refuge for the homeless.
ROTFL! Quite the contrary. Oddly enough, it was part of a control system
for a sawmill, which I found quite an odd use for FORTRAN, but that was what
the original programmer used.
> Jump Usher Jump!
>
> Oh, that's right. Mr. Usher thinks that a bit of basic is "computer
> hacking"
>
> 10 println "Jump Usher"
> 20 GOTO 10
Total luser...anyone with a shred of programming ability would avoid a goto.
> I keep forgetting that Usher's wetware was never upgraded, just (self)-
> degraded.
And, I on the other hand, never forget that Mr Hudson is an idiot troll.
--
Jennifer Usher
JenniferFlusher
> Lady Marmalade "a bit out of date"? It was less than 10 years ago that
> Moulin Rouge won several Oscars and Golden Globes. It included a cover of
> Lady Marmalade by, among others, Christina Aguilera and Pink.
> ...I'm sure the public will be disappointed to know that Christina Aguilera and
> Pink are now no longer to be considered part of popular culture, because
> some fat old gay man who pretends to be a woman and lives in a homeless
> hostel says so.
>
> Do you even know what century it is, Mr. Usher Lady Rice-A-Roni?
You hit on something interesting really.
No, Howard really does not know anything of current cultural trends.
He lives with other homeless people, other crack and drug addicts and
other mentally unsound individuals. He shuts himself up in his room
right after he comes home from work because
1. He can't afford to do anything else (low income supported housing)
2. His "peers" in the Mission Hotel are dangerous people. More so than
him. He's just an insane clown - most of those others have done hard
time.
So Usher, having no other friends, isn't caught up on the latest fads.
The crack addicts and prostitutes that room i the same building with
him aren't up much on anything other than where to score the cheapest
hit of whatever they happen to crave at the moment.
Leaving Usher hopelessly behind and out of touch in the world save for
anything he can gather form his filthy little keyboard that he spends
so much time with.
Usher doesn't know Pink from Puce. He has no one to talk with and
discuss what is happening in the world.
All he has is his little argument with us to pass the time.
Jennifer Usher
"Barbie" <bar...@transboutique.com> wrote in message
news:hro1am$kce$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/02/09/BAGL1BV49N.DTL
>> About 13 percent of San Francisco's middle school students and 11 percent
>> of high school students self-identified as gay, lesbian, bisexual or
>> transgender, according to a district survey.
>
> You don't have a clue, Mr. Usher Lady Rice-A-Roni.
He forgets that San Francisco is not representative of the world.
> But we already knew that.
>
> And if it were only 1%, that would still be over 3 million people just in
> the United States.
And over 300 million who are not.
> But of course, it doesn't matter, because you were never trans-anything.
> Not
> a transvestite (for over a decade), not "more than an transvestite but
> less
> than a transsexual" (which clearly also fails the binary gender model),
> and
> not a transsexual (which we kind of already figured out). And certainly
> not
> "just a woman" - because a woman born with XY chromosomes and a penis is
> also not part of the binary gender model.
ROTFL! The clue meter reads zero on this one as well. No, not trans
anything. I was a transsexual, but I was cured of that. I have had no
desire to change my sex since February 10, 2006.
> No, you're none of those. I agree with you. You're not trans-anything.
> You're just a gay guy in total denial. Lady Rice-A-Roni, the other San
> Francisco treat. Speaking of which - "Sugir".
As I have observed, Mr. Hudson is a classic homophobic, and totally
clueless, transvestite. I imagine that Willy Boy, who is equally clueless,
suggested the "Sugir" bit. A part of my life that faded away a long time
ago. Really, he should try harder. I always welcome a good laugh.
--
Jennifer Usher
Jennifer Usher
"Barbie" <bar...@transboutique.com> wrote in message
news:hro44r$nig$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> Jennifer Usher wrote:
>
>> A bit out of date on the cultural references
>
> Lady Marmalade "a bit out of date"? It was less than 10 years ago that
> Moulin Rouge won several Oscars and Golden Globes. It included a cover of
> Lady Marmalade by, among others, Christina Aguilera and Pink.
>
> It also became the most successful airplay-only single in US history.
> Hardly
> out of date.
Is this guy for real? I mean, really? He thinks things don't fade in much
less than 10 years.
> I'm sure the public will be disappointed to know that Christina Aguilera
> and
> Pink are now no longer to be considered part of popular culture, because
> some fat old gay man who pretends to be a woman and lives in a homeless
> hostel says so.
>
> Do you even know what century it is, Mr. Usher Lady Rice-A-Roni? Or did
> time
> stop when your old man caught you masturbating to pictures of men in
> Sports
> Illustrated and threatened to beat the gay out of you?
I do believe Mr. Hudson is projecting.
> FYI, Christina is 29 years old, and ranked #58 on Rolling Stones all-time
> greatest singers, and she's the youngest on the list. She has an album
> coming out next month.
>
> Pink? She's a year older, and billboard puts her at the #1 pop artist of
> the
> decade 2000-2009. Last year she was the 6th-highest paid artist.
I do believe Mr. Hudson actually fancies himself a teenage girl. ROTFL!
Well, that or he spent a bit of time on Google. Either way....loser.
> No, the only one out of date is you - you stopped growing up back in the
> '70s.
Well, yes, I have been about 5'10" since the 70's. People tend to reach
their full height in the early 20's.
--
Jennifer Usher
Barbie
>> Jump Usher Jump!
>>
>> Oh, that's right. Mr. Usher thinks that a bit of basic is "computer
>> hacking"
>>
>> 10 println "Jump Usher"
>> 20 GOTO 10
>
> Total luser...anyone with a shred of programming ability would avoid a
> goto.
Both Donald Knuth (and you don't get much more authoritative than Knuth) and
Torvalds disagree with you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goto
Donald Knuth's Structured Programming with go to Statements [5] which
analyzes many common programming tasks and finds that in some of them GOTO
is the optimal language construct to use. Linux Kernel designer and coder
Linus Torvalds also objects to Dijkstra's point of view, stating that GOTOs
can be a useful language feature, improving program speed, size and code
clearness at the same time, but only when used in a sensible way by
comparably sensible programmer.[6]
If you had any brains, you'd also know that setjmp/longjmp (for exception
handling) are also gotos, in that they jump to a labeled statement bypassing
local control statements, same as a goto.
Then again, you stopped learning anything in 1972. Moron.
JenniferFlusher
> ROTFL! Quite the contrary. Oddly enough, it was part of a control
> system for a sawmill, which I found quite an odd use for FORTRAN, but
> that was what the original programmer used.
Usher, you can't code . Never have.
That's why you are in a low income homeless/assisted housing facility.
Because you have no skills.
>
> Total luser...anyone with a shred of programming ability would avoid a goto.
Yaaaa ... they stopped saying "luser" in 1994. Just so you know, m'Okayyy ?
> And, I on the other hand, never forget that Mr Hudson is an idiot troll.
Barbara lives in her own house. Where do you live?
Barbara has a car. Do you?
Barbara cooks her food in a kitchen , on stoves and in an oven. Do you ?
Barbara has a place with more than one room. Do you? Do you even have
a closet in your room?
Barbara has spending money? Do you?
Barbara' neighbors are not drug addicts and criminals. Who lives in YOUR hall?
Barbara's income is self sufficient? Who subsidizes your apartment, Howard?
Barbara is respected by everyone in this forum - including me . Don;t
agree with a lot of what she does but I respect her. Who here respects
for you (oh please , don't say Ruby - that's just too pathetic) . Can
you name any one person other than your pitiful sock puppett? Just one?
Barbara wins.
JenniferFlusher
> Both Donald Knuth (and you don't get much more authoritative than Knuth) and
> Torvalds disagree with you:
Stop confusing the man with facts !
How awfully rude .
Barbie
>> And if it were only 1%, that would still be over 3 million people just in
>> the United States.
>
> And over 300 million who are not.
So, even using your inaccurate figures, it's okay to ignore 3 million
people. And their families (which brings the total to around 15 million
people who have to deal with the issue).
There are only 4 states in the US with over 15 million population. 20 states
have less than 3 million.
What an ignorant moron. Keep showing us just how stupid you can be, Lady
Rice-A-Roni.
Barbie
> Barbara is respected by everyone in this forum - including me . Don;t
> agree with a lot of what she does but I respect her.
Actually, I've been thinking about it, and I think I over-reacted to the
posts that I took to be trolling on transboutique. I could have handled it
better. I *should* have handled it better. I'm open to suggestions on how to
make it right, if you or anyone else have any.
I've already removed the IP block, and I'll do a write-up acknowledging my
mistake after I get your (and others) input.
Thanks.
Jennifer Usher
"Barbie" <bar...@transboutique.com> wrote in message
news:hro740$qn8$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> Actually, I've been thinking about it, and I think I over-reacted to the
> posts that I took to be trolling on transboutique. I could have handled it
> better. I *should* have handled it better. I'm open to suggestions on how
> to
> make it right, if you or anyone else have any.
>
> I've already removed the IP block, and I'll do a write-up acknowledging my
> mistake after I get your (and others) input.
Awww, how sweet, the idiot trolls are making up....
Of course, as expected, transvestiteboutique has proven to be an abject
failure. Mr. Hudson's noble experiment failed, and he is back here trolling
me.
--
Jennifer Usher
Jennifer Usher
"Barbie" <bar...@transboutique.com> wrote in message
news:hro5mp$p2v$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> So, even using your inaccurate figures, it's okay to ignore 3 million
> people. And their families (which brings the total to around 15 million
> people who have to deal with the issue).
>
> There are only 4 states in the US with over 15 million population. 20
> states
> have less than 3 million.
>
> What an ignorant moron. Keep showing us just how stupid you can be, Lady
> Rice-A-Roni.
What Mr. Hudson is forgetting, or perhaps trying to deny to himself, is that
a great many of those "3 million" people he is talking about are engaged in
chosen behavior. They are acting out. While that is not true of those who
are true transsexuals (which leaves out the idiot trolls here), and those
who are gay and lesbian, that leaves a large portion who simply choose to
rebel against their gender. Sadly, this is the group that those like Mr.
Hudson really want to protect. True transsexuals (a very small group) have
a legitimate need to use the appropriate bathrooms. For those who are gay
and lesbian, there really is no bathroom issue. So, that leaves the
fruitcakes like Mr. Hudson, who wish to pretend to be women, and who demand
the right to march into the ladies room and freak the real women out.
Barbie
Coming from someone who still gets questioning stares every time they go on
the street, that's pretty funny.
The laws to protect transgenders are more than about bathrooms. Only the
ignorant, like the American College of Pediatrics (the fundie front that
believes your birth sex is what counts, same-sex marriage is wrong, and that
transsexuals can be "cured") frame it as a bathroom issue.
Of course, you can't expect any better from someone who denies they're
transgendered - just a "woman" (ignoring the fact they have a prostate,
which clearly marks them as transgender).
Your intolerance and bigotry is showing again, Mr. Usher Lady Rice-A-Roni
And for those just tuning in, Usher has been abusing pronouns with everyone
he disagrees with for the last decade, so I'm returning the favor.
Jennifer (Lady Rice-A-Roni) Usher, who now claims not to be transgendered,
hooks up for transgender sex:
"here is a guy who sees me as a woman, who is willing to look beyond my
penis" (that would be Sugir the TransFan whose last pal had a penis bigger
than his)
source: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.srs/msg/5c58787ebffced47
"That's not to say that the sex isn't wonderful, but then again, that is
really not anyone's business anyway." (but I'll post it on the net because
I'm Jennifer Usher and I want people to know I'm getting my prostate
massaged by a TransFan)
source: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.srs/msg/c71798acc4a0a759
"I was the one who made the first real move. I casually mentioned was
looking for a relationship"
source: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.srs/msg/fd03cf3a4813c975
Let's all celebrate Jennifer Usher not being at all part of "that icky
transgender community" by humming a few bars of Lady Rice-A-Roni ...
LADY RICE-A-RONI
(to the tune of LADY MARMALADE)
Hey Mister, so Mister, gay Mister, lets go Mister
Hey Mister, so Mister, gay Mister, lets go Mister
Hey, hey, heyyyyy! Ouch!!!
"More, more, more!"
Now Usher's at workfare doing 9 to 5
Living his sad life of lies
But when he turns off to sleep
Back the memories seep
"More, more, more"
Gitchi gitchi you're my dada
Gitchi gitchi I'm your ho
Fill my gay mangina ah ah
He's Usher "Lady Rice-A-Roni"
Voulez-vous coucher avec moi ce soir?
I'm your San Francisco treat
Voulez-vous coucher avec moi ce soir?
Ask for Usher "Lady Rice-A-Roni"
Gitchi gitchi you're my dada
Gitchi gitchi I'm your ho
Fill my gay mangina ah ah
He's Usher "Lady Rice-A-Roni"
Voulez-vous coucher avec moi ce soir?
I'm your San Francisco treat
Voulez-vous coucher avec moi ce soir?
That's Usher "Lady Rice-A-Roni"
... fade out ...
Barbie
It's going fine, porkchop. Consider this just research on quislings in the
trans community ... BTW, how's the prostate, Mr. "I'm not part of the
transgender community?
Jennifer (Lady Rice-A-Roni) Usher, who now claims not to be transgendered
(your doctors would disagree, but what do they know compared to you, right
...), scores some transgender sex:
"here is a guy who sees me as a woman, who is willing to look beyond my
penis" (he has to, because my penis is smaller than has last pal, who had a
"big beautiful penis")
source: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.srs/msg/5c58787ebffced47
"That's not to say that the sex isn't wonderful, but then again, that is
really not anyone's business anyway." (so that's why I'm not posting it on
the net ... oh wait ... )
source: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.srs/msg/c71798acc4a0a759
"I was the one who made the first real move. I casually mentioned was
looking for a relationship" (to a TransFan, but I'm not transgender, unless
that's what it takes to get me hooked up)
source: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.srs/msg/fd03cf3a4813c975
That's Mr. Jennifer Usher, a.k.a. Lady Rice-A-Roni, San Francisco's other
treat. We're SO happy you're not transgender.
fluffybunnie
>
> Let's all celebrate Jennifer Usher not being at all part of "that icky
> transgender community" by humming a few bars of Lady Rice-A-Roni ...
>
8<----8<----8<----SNIP---->8---->8---->8
*Much* too graphic for me!
Eeewwwww -- just... ewwwwwwwww...
Some things are simply too horrible to contemplate in detail.
Oh God, ick...
I have to purge this horror from my mind somehow, it's nearly time for lunch!
***shudder***
Jennifer Usher
"Barbie" <bar...@transboutique.com> wrote in message
news:hrp5iu$dg5$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> Coming from someone who still gets questioning stares every time they go
> on
> the street, that's pretty funny.
A figment of Mr. Hudson's imagination...or more likely projection of his own
experience.
> The laws to protect transgenders are more than about bathrooms. Only the
> ignorant, like the American College of Pediatrics (the fundie front that
> believes your birth sex is what counts, same-sex marriage is wrong, and
> that
> transsexuals can be "cured") frame it as a bathroom issue.
And they are not worth worrying over. No, transsexuals cannot be cured.
That is firmly established. Now, screwed up men like Mr. Hudson? That is,
perhaps, a different story.
> Of course, you can't expect any better from someone who denies they're
> transgendered - just a "woman" (ignoring the fact they have a prostate,
> which clearly marks them as transgender).
Oh, this is too good. Mr. Hudson's ignorance is quite extensive. It is
tempting to simply suggest that he look up "Skene's gland," or more
correctly, "paraurethral gland." Ah, but he is such a fool, he would simply
blow that off. No, this shall be quite amusing. You see, it is a common
belief among pseudo-transsexuals that, even if they really mess up and
actually have the surgery and lose their penis and their testicles, they can
still cling to their prostate. They they still have that one bit of tissue
that means they are really a man. But, that is not exactly the case. You
see, prostates are not unique to men. Everyone, and in EVERYONE, and in
boys, girls, men, and women, all have a prostate gland. They just call it a
paraurethral gland if the person is a woman. Same tissue, same location,
same function (though more rarely in women), and yes, even a chance of
cancer (although extremely rare in women.) Just as men can have breast
cancer, women can have "prostate" cancer. So, when a transsexual completes
transition they simply have what every other woman has. They can't claim
any special status, and quite frankly, having a PSA is a waste of time and
money. But for those who really want to hang onto their maleness, it is a
source of false comfort. So, no, my prostate does not, and could not, MAKE
me transgender. Transgender is an artificial political/social construct
that one may, or may not, identify with. It is a highly subjective term,
with NO objective meaning. Anyone can say they are transgender, and no one
should be called that who does not choose to identify that way.
> Your intolerance and bigotry is showing again, Mr. Usher Lady Rice-A-Roni
He really thinks the Rice-A-Roni stuff is clever. What a sad little joke.
> And for those just tuning in, Usher has been abusing pronouns with
> everyone
> he disagrees with for the last decade, so I'm returning the favor.
No, actually, I simply don't buy the silly lie that one changes one's sex by
saying, "I am a woman."
<YAWN>
And that's Mr. Hudson, the homophobic transvestite. Sad, truly sad. I bet
he thinks AIDS is a gas.
--
Jennifer Usher
Jennifer Usher
"Barbie" <bar...@transboutique.com> wrote in message
news:hrp64a$ec9$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> It's going fine, porkchop. Consider this just research on quislings in the
> trans community ... BTW, how's the prostate, Mr. "I'm not part of the
> transgender community?
Oh yes, let's consider that. Now, for anyone who is actually new here
(yeah, sure) Mr. Hudson has long dreamed of creating a transgender web site
that would end the battles here. We I declined to play along with his
plans, he turned on me. He eventually flounced off in a huff, and
occasionally returned to troll. Then a few months ago, about four to be
more precise, he talked the other idiot trolls here into starting up his web
site. Goat Boy and Willy Boy joined with "Helen" Detroit (who at least
admit to being a crossdresser) and Mr. Hudson and formed the group. Lask,
who is trying to pretend to not be himself, was not going to join something
that required giving his real name. This was supposed to end
alt.support.srs and bring ruin and misery to me. Of course, I was glad to
see them all go. But, it didn't work. They quickly either lost interest,
or got in fights. Or both. Without a target, they had nothing much to talk
about. Even though this was supposed to be a "Jennifer Usher-free zone," it
wasn't. They couldn't let go. Mr. Hudson, after I pointed out what a joke
it was, decided to attack me again. When that effectively failed, he tried
to pretend his joke of a website was actually relevant. it isn't. He has
lied about the number of hits. The evidence shows that even if people were
visiting as much as he claims, they don't stay, they don't comment, and they
don't come back. It was a bad joke, and it failed in its original purpose.
Now, after his proud departure, Mr. Hudson returns to toss truly lame
attacks at me, and even though Albert Einstein did not say it, he is proving
that insanity really is doing the same thing and expecting different
results. He keeps repeating the same, tired, homophobic taunts, and he
keeps expecting them to upset me.
Hmmm, could Mr. Hudson be part of Fred Phelps' family?
Again....<YAWN>
--
Jennifer Usher
Barbie
> [some more ignorant nonsense about not having a prostate]
Recognize this url? University of California San Francisco.
http://php.ucsf.edu/PatientEd/MedicalCareofTransexualpts.pdf
> Journal of gay and Lesbian Medical Association, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2000
> Clinical Update
> Medical Care of Transsexual Patients
> Kathleen A. Oriel, M.D., M.S.
>
> Page 187
> "In MTFs older than 40, this should include digital rectal exam and
> palpation of the prostate."
>
But you, living in a homeless refuge, know better than a doctor. Maybe you
should go and correct her. Let us know when that happens so we can arrange a
webcast.
http://www.qlinks.ca/transsexual-health
Prostate Health
> Even if you’ve had sex reassignment surgery, it’s important that you get
> an annual prostate exam after age 50, or age 40 if you’re African-
> American. Taking estrogen should reduce prostate problems, but there is a
> slight chance it may cause prostate enlargement. Talk to your provider
> about routine screenings for prostate cancer."
>
Or you can ask Andrea James:
http://www.tsroadmap.com/physical/vaginoplasty/female-anatomy.html
> Surgeons do not remove the prostate gland and Cowper's gland in the
> current techniques.
>
> This means you will have some secretions when aroused from these glands.
> This will frequently not be enough for lubrication during sex for many
> women, but you will have some.
>
> Also, for this reason, it's important to have a prostate exam whenever you
> have a gynecological exam. Prostate cancer is a major killer, although the
> likelihood in trans women is probably significantly reduced. Still, you
> should have it checked regularly along with your breasts and vagina,
> especially after 35.
>
gendercenter.org.au gives the same advice as James. So does lgbthealth.net.
So does the University of Southern California.
They all call it a prostate, and they all recommend a prostate exam.
No, you've still got a prostate Lady Rice-A-Roni.
And this is why nobody believes anything Mr. Usher says - he's just Lady
Rice-a-Roni, the other San Francisco treat. Good for a few laughs, and an
example of what NOT to do.
Like it or not, both the medical and transsexual communities consider
transsexuals as transgendered. You. Have. A. Prostate.
Saying that the male prostate is the same as the Skene's gland because they
both originated as part of the Wolffian duct in the embryo is just wishful
thinking (or denial) by Usher, Lady Rice-A-Roni. What next - claim you
always had a clitoris because it originates in the same tissue in both male
and female in utero?
Hey, why not do your ROFLMAO some more - you could use the exercise, get rid
of a few pounds, squish a few cockroaches, get people to practice their
earthquake safety drill.
... you know, instead of continuing to spread misinformation on the net that
can cause people health problems, or get them killed, down the road?
And just to remind everyone why we're having this discussion ... there's
nothing wrong with straight sex, same-sex, trans-sex, transfan-sex, etc.,
There's only something wrong with continually lying about everything you
ever did, and constantly changing your story, like Mr "transvestite porn
writer less than a transsexual but suddenly a true transsexual born
fundamentalist christian woman never was transgendered don't have a
prostate" Jennifer Lady Rice-A-Roni Usher.
Wow. Try saying THAT 5 times fast!
Anyone who wants can read your Satin Lacey transvestite porn, where you make
it quite clear you wish your wife stay with you even though you're an
unemployed fat man in drag because she brings home the bacon.
Jennifer (Lady Rice-A-Roni) Usher, who now claims not to be transgendered,
hooks up for transgender sex:
"here is a guy who sees me as a woman, who is willing to look beyond my
penis"
source: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.srs/msg/5c58787ebffced47
"That's not to say that the sex isn't wonderful, but then again, that is
really not anyone's business anyway."
source: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.srs/msg/c71798acc4a0a759
"I was the one who made the first real move. I casually mentioned was
looking for a relationship"
source: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.srs/msg/fd03cf3a4813c975
Barbie
> returns to toss truly lame
> attacks at me, and even though Albert Einstein did not say it, he is
> proving that insanity really is doing the same thing and expecting
> different results
The site is doing fine.
I'm here to gather material.
On quislings.
And I'm enjoying it.
It's important to enjoy what you do, don't you think?
You know what a quisling is, don't you?
Look in the mirror.
Make sure it's a WIDE mirror - don't want you losing the full effect.
btw:
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/a/alberteins133991.html
>
> Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting
> different results.
> Albert Einstein
Doesn't take an Einstein to do a look-up. Do you have any proof he didn't
say it? Like maybe you stole his brain, ate it, and think you're now some
sort of an Einstein?
BTW - the word for today is "Prostate" - same as yesterday. Doctors at UCSF
agree you still have one. Poor Jennifer Lady Rice-A-Roni Usher.
And just to remind everyone ONE MORE TIME ...
Jennifer (Lady Rice-A-Roni) Usher, who now claims not to be transgendered,
hooks up for transgender sex:
"here is a guy who sees me as a woman, who is willing to look beyond my
penis"
source: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.srs/msg/5c58787ebffced47
"That's not to say that the sex isn't wonderful, but then again, that is
really not anyone's business anyway."
source: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.srs/msg/c71798acc4a0a759
"I was the one who made the first real move. I casually mentioned was
looking for a relationship"
source: http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.srs/msg/fd03cf3a4813c975
Jennifer Usher
"Barbie" <bar...@transboutique.com> wrote in message
news:hrqljt$tj3$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> Jennifer Usher wrote:
>
>> [some more ignorant nonsense about not having a prostate]
Translation: Usher is right, but I'll be damned if I will admit it.
Nope, not ignorant at all. Just simple facts, lost on a fool like Mr.
Hudson.
> Recognize this url? University of California San Francisco.
> http://php.ucsf.edu/PatientEd/MedicalCareofTransexualpts.pdf
>> Journal of gay and Lesbian Medical Association, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2000
>> Clinical Update
>> Medical Care of Transsexual Patients
>> Kathleen A. Oriel, M.D., M.S.
>>
>> Page 187
>> "In MTFs older than 40, this should include digital rectal exam and
>> palpation of the prostate."
>>
>
> But you, living in a homeless refuge, know better than a doctor. Maybe you
> should go and correct her. Let us know when that happens so we can arrange
> a
> webcast.
Mr. Hudson presumes he knows my living situation. He doesn't.
This is an issue where there is disagreement. Some doctors, and some
patients, seek to keep a link that maintains that a transsexual remains a
male. Part of this is simply CYA. Others hold that if a patient showed no
signs of prostate problems before surgery, there is no need to bother
afterwards. Now, as I pointed out, some love keeping that link. Others
prefer not to.
> No, you've still got a prostate Lady Rice-A-Roni.
Mr. Hudson is entitled to his beliefs, wrong as they may be. But then
again, he still has a penis, and two testicles....and yet, this idiot thinks
he is fully female.
Evidence of Mr. Hudson's insanity, not mention his inanity, clipped for
brevity.
But as always,
<YAWN>
--
Jennifer Usher
JenniferFlusher
> But you, living in a homeless refuge, know better than a doctor. Maybe you
> should go and correct her. Let us know when that happens so we can arrange a
> webcast.
You're wasting your time you know.
He's a cross dressing 55 year old guy who weighs about 300 pounds and
things he passes as a woman and who has been living in a homeless
shelter for over 6 years now.
That's who you are talking to.
I'm just sayn' .....
P.S. You're giving him the only attention and conversation he gets
anywhere outside of his workfare position. He's hanging on your every
word... waiting by his computer for you to say something so he can
respond.
Jennifer Usher
"Barbie" <bar...@transboutique.com> wrote in message
news:hrqmb5$uqm$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> Jennifer Usher wrote:
>
>> returns to toss truly lame
>> attacks at me, and even though Albert Einstein did not say it, he is
>> proving that insanity really is doing the same thing and expecting
>> different results
>
> The site is doing fine.
Sure it is....there is just no one reading it, or responding there. But,
otherwise it is doing just fine.
> I'm here to gather material.
>
> On quislings.
My, but that is very close to a Godwin's Law violation.
> And I'm enjoying it.
>
> It's important to enjoy what you do, don't you think?
Hey, I get quite a good laugh out of idiots like Mr. Hudson. If he enjoys
acting the fool, that is up to him.
> You know what a quisling is, don't you?
>
> Look in the mirror.
>
> Make sure it's a WIDE mirror - don't want you losing the full effect.
Yes, let's just call that a Godwin's Law violation. Hudson loses,
> btw:
>
> http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/a/alberteins133991.html
>>
>> Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting
>> different results.
>> Albert Einstein
>
> Doesn't take an Einstein to do a look-up. Do you have any proof he didn't
> say it? Like maybe you stole his brain, ate it, and think you're now some
> sort of an Einstein?
But it does take a fool (i.e. Mr. Hudson) to ignore the numerous sites that
show he is wrong. Here are just a few.
The answer isn't really known but current consensus is that it came from the
author Rita Mae Brown in her book Sudden Death on Pg. 68 from 1983.
Quote: "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again but expecting
different results."
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Who_first_said_the_definition_of_insanity_is_to_do_the_same_thing_over_and_over_and_expect_different_results
As to the source of the quote - I first heard it in an est seminar back in
the 80s and it was attributed to Rita Mae Brown. My own research results, as
in these responses, have included both Rita and Einstein most often, but no
one can site where and when he said it so that it can be looked up. The Rita
Mae Brown citation includes the publication and the page, which leads me to
believe that she did write it - but not necessarily first. If Einstein
actually said it, someone should be able to tell me where and when and, if
its not written down, who witnessed it.
The earliest attribution, by the way, was an "ancient Chinese proverb".
http://rodgerv.wordpress.com/2007/02/10/insanity-doing-the-same-thing-over-and-over-again-and-expecting-different-results/
Insanity is doing the same thing, over and over again, but expecting
different results.
Rita Mae Brown, Sudden Death (Bantam Books, New York, 1983), p. 68
(attributed to Jane Fulton).
This and variations on it have also been variously attributed to Benjamin
Franklin and an old Chinese proverb.
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Insanity
And, no one can produce a single citation for a work by Einstein where he
says this, or any record of him saying it during a speech.
This sort of thing is quite common. A quote becomes popular, is attributed
to someone who didn't say it, and it becomes common dogma. And when it is
pointed out to an idiot that the person did not say it, the idiot runs and
finds a web site that misattributes the quote.
Now, Mr. Hudson is the epitome of what this quote is talking about.
> BTW - the word for today is "Prostate" - same as yesterday. Doctors at
> UCSF
> agree you still have one. Poor Jennifer Lady Rice-A-Roni Usher.
No, in his insanity, and his determination to avoid actually providing any
real arguments, Mr. Hudson finds something that says what he wishes, and
ignores other things.
Repeated...
<YAWN>
Same result....
Hudson is insane....
And more than a little trite.
--
Jennifer Usher
Barbie
> My, but that is very close to a Godwin's Law violation.
If the brown-shirt fits, wear it, porkchop!
It'll also hide some of those nasty stains and bite marks, quisling.
Barbie
>> You know what a quisling is, don't you?
>> Look in the mirror.
>> Make sure it's a WIDE mirror - don't want you losing the full effect.
>
> Yes, let's just call that a Godwin's Law violation. Hudson loses,
The only loser is you. But if you get one of those fun-house mirrors, you
might be able to fake losing 100 pounds.
But if you want, I don't mind referring to you as Satin Lacy, transvestite
porn writer, instead of Lady Rice-A-Roni, San Francisco's "other" treat.
Or are you now going to try to deny you ever wrote and/or posted
transvestite porn under the nym "Satin Lacy"?
That would be a smart move, because there's some kiddie porn floating around
the net under that nym (which begs the question, even if it's just reposting
your stuff under a different name ...)
Jennifer Usher
"Barbie" <bar...@transboutique.com> wrote in message
news:hs4a6d$ikl$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
Whoops, there's no question now. Game over, Mr. Hudson loses.
--
Jennifer Usher
Jennifer Usher
"Barbie" <bar...@transboutique.com> wrote in message
news:hs4bo5$lpl$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
> Jennifer Usher wrote:
>>> You know what a quisling is, don't you?
>>> Look in the mirror.
>>> Make sure it's a WIDE mirror - don't want you losing the full effect.
>>
>> Yes, let's just call that a Godwin's Law violation. Hudson loses,
>
> The only loser is you. But if you get one of those fun-house mirrors, you
> might be able to fake losing 100 pounds.
Obviously, he doesn't like losing. Most men don't.
> But if you want, I don't mind referring to you as Satin Lacy, transvestite
> porn writer, instead of Lady Rice-A-Roni, San Francisco's "other" treat.
Hey, he can call me whatever he wants. It just shows how desperate he is
becoming
> Or are you now going to try to deny you ever wrote and/or posted
> transvestite porn under the nym "Satin Lacy"?
As a matter of fact. this is not remotely true. The simple fact is, I wrote
a satirical piece, which, sadly, some took far too seriously. I nuked it on
Google, and then found out that someone, who uses that user name, had
reposted it without attribution. One of the idiot trolls, who apparently
enjoyed reading it, found that copy and tried to attribute it to me.
> That would be a smart move, because there's some kiddie porn floating
> around
> the net under that nym (which begs the question, even if it's just
> reposting
> your stuff under a different name ...)
I would have no idea. Unlike Mr. Hudson, apparently, I don't go searching
for kiddie porn. Well, I guess we have learned something new about Mr.
Hudson, who we now know is both homophobic and is into kiddie porn. (Yeah,
I know, but let's give him a taste of his own medicine.) Hmmm, at this
rate, the next thing we know, he will be named the new head of NARTH.
--
Jennifer Usher
JenniferFlusher
> Or are you now going to try to deny you ever wrote and/or posted
> transvestite porn under the nym "Satin Lacy"?
Well there was a surprise!
Lardo McPorkchop did deny it.
And did you expect anything else from a gay man in denial, pretending
to be a woman, who lives in State supported housing?
Really?
One day , for a laugh, I'll take some video from in front of Porkchop's
shelter. Maybe I'll get lucky and catch a shot of the Big Man himself !