"Inconsequential" <m...@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:7onvbmF...@mid.individual.net...
> Willow wrote:
>> This month 51 jennisu...@gmail.com
>> 17 jflus...@imaman.org
>> 10 fluffybun...@127.0.0.1
>> 8 panga...@telus.net
>> 6 futuregirl70...@gmail.com
>> 6 futuregirl70...@invalid.invalid
>> 4 karmictara...@2die4.com
>> 2 whogivesast...@inyaface.com
>> 2 m...@privacy.net
>> 2 x...@m.com
>
>
> Surely the issue should be the quality as opposed to quantity of
> Jennifer's posts .
> There is nothing wrong in itself in posting a lot but posting a lot while
> posting rubbish would be a different kettle of fish.
As I pointed out, most of mine were in response to Helen, but the stats are
misleading because her posts are not archived, and thus not counted.
> I make no judgement either way as to the quality or lack of Jennifer's
> posts.
Okay.... But, again, I will point out that pretty much every post from
Willy Boy was a troll.
--
Jennifer Usher
>
> Okay.... But, again, I will point out that pretty much every post from
> Willy Boy was a troll.
>
I believe Willow thinks the same about your posts.What, to your mind,
qualifies her posts so frequently as trolling?
Or are you merely conditioned due to past and present enmities to see
each other's posts as trolling?
"Inconsequential" <m...@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:7ooihvF...@mid.individual.net...
Every post he makes is a a new attempt to spark a fight....for example the
most recent one. If he doesn't post, I generally don't even mention him.
--
Jennifer Usher
ROFLMAO...
>
> Simply put, everyone of my posts was in response to someone else, mostly
> Helen.
>
And mostly they were about making excuses for why you need to be a
troll.
> Everyone of Willy Boy's posts was a troll.
>
Trolled the freakishly fat man masquerading as a pot-op.
> Once again, Lardo, as they say, is hoist by his own petard.
>
FTFY.
--
(\__/)
(=^.^=)
(")_(")