Re: ONS: gay 'divorces' up by 44 per cent
martin
> "Yap"<hhya...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:e1bc018e-34c6-419f...@p10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jul 11, 10:48 am, "J"<jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
>> Its' only been 5 years since gays were recognized as 'couples' in the
>> U.K.,
>> and already these people are making a mockery of the institution of
>> marriage. This nonsense about SSM should stop before it goes any further.
>> It's a social experiment that has failed.
>>
>> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/8623151/ONS-gay-divorces-up-by...
>>
>> Lesbian couples are twice as likely as gay men to separate, according to
>> new
>> figures showing a 44 per cent rise in the number of civil partnerships
>> that
>> were dissolved last year.
>>
>>
>
>
>
> Why is your reply in Roman Catholic group ?
>
> We are not interested.
Yes you are liar.
Buddythunder
> "Buddythunder" <davidarthu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:55825e6b-4bac-43cb...@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
> On Jul 11, 3:22 pm, "ckdbig...@gmail.com" <ckdbig...@gmail.com> wrote:> On Jul 10, 10:48 pm, "J" <jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
>
> > > Its' only been 5 years since gays were recognized as 'couples' in the
> > > U.K.,
> > > and already these people are making a mockery of the institution of
> > > marriage
>
> Its' only been 5 years since gays were recognized as 'couples' in the U.K.,
> and already these people are making a mockery of the institution of
> marriage. This nonsense about SSM should stop before it goes any further.
> It's a social experiment that has failed.
So what? Lots of straight people split up too (more? I don't know),
but we don't try to curtail their rights. Why should it matter?
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/8623151/ONS-gay-divorces-up-by...
>
> Lesbian couples are twice as likely as gay men to separate, according to new
> figures showing a 44 per cent rise in the number of civil partnerships that
> were dissolved last year.
So what?
> Of course, and marriage between one man and one woman must be stopped
> super-duper immediately to stop the mockery! If SSM must be chucked
> because large numbers of them end in divorce, then straight marriage
> should be chucked even quicker!
>
> I'm okay with that, as I find marriage a needlessly expensive and
> quaintly outdated religious excercise. I would prefer a civil union if
> there's some crazy woman out there keen enough to take me on one fine
> day! It has all the public declaration of a marriage without all the
> odious silliness of divine oversight.
>
> Come on J, I know you're not committed to making rational arguments or
> anything, but this was even more oblivious to sense than usual.
Mitchell Holman
> God has already sent AIDS as a warning to homosexuals.
"AIDS is not just God's punishment for homosexuals;
it is God's punishment for the society that tolerates
homosexuals."
-Jerry Fallwell, 1993.
He failed to elaborate on his alternative to "tolerating"
homosexuals.........
hamilton
Remember, every revolution needs an enemy.
Some one you can kill with no hard feelings or regret.
h
W.T.S.
>
> "Yap" <hhya...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:e1bc018e-34c6-419f...@p10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> > Its' only been 5 years since gays were recognized as 'couples' in the
> > U.K.,
>
>
"God" is lying bull shit. Please do us all a favor and stop quoting
this lying bull shit. Remember, if it's "God", it's bull shit.
>
http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/print/14481
John Baker
>
>"W.T.S." <m1...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:MPG.28845f79e...@news.west.earthlink.net...
>> In article <4ral6c....@news.alt.net>, jerk...@liar.com says...
>>> "Mitchell Holman" <nom...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>> news:Xns9F1EE3DD2E01E...@216.196.121.131...
>>> > "J" <jerk...@liar.com> wrote in news:4radr8....@news.alt.net:
>>> >
>>> >> Its' only been 5 years since gays were recognized as 'couples' in the
>>> >> U.K., and already these people are making a mockery of the institution
>>> >> of marriage.
>>> >
>>> > Divorce makes a mockery of marriage? Then why
>>> > is it legal, and even sanctioned in your Bible?
>>> >
>>> My Bible? I have never written anything called "the Bible". My
>>> philosophies
>>> are all based on morals, family values, and decency.
>
>> Wow!!! You really can't stop lying, can you?
>
>
>Did J wrote the Bible or W.T.S. can't stop lying, can you?
Nobody's disputing that 'J' did not write the Bible. The lie is J's
claim that his philosophies are in any way based on morals, family
values and/or decency. He doesn't know the meaning of any of those
things.
>
napoleon dynamite
OMG you are an absolute, complete idiot. You should spend a lot less
time judging other people but instead focus on getting on own house in
order. You can't tell people what they can and can't do in bed. It's
quite simply none of your business.