Would you accept sex if it has no attachment and is just sex for the sake of
it with a girl you just met?
>
> Would you accept sex if it has no attachment and is just sex for the
> sake of it with a girl you just met?
>
Absolutely. Nothing wrong with casual sex if you wear enough protection.
--
"Whining" behaviour doesn't work - or it provides a sort of unhealthy,
secondary support which is rooted in pity rather than sincerity.
--Marc Meunier
I don't want sex at all, ever. It scares the crap out of me.
Marriage or bust.
> Would you accept sex if it has no attachment and is just sex for the sake
of
> it with a girl you just met?
Naw. Not worth the risks for either of us.
DF, you may be sex phobic.
That could explain your behaviour.
It's a symptom, not the cause you putz.
I'd only be interested in a commited relationship. Casual sex just seems
wrong to me.
Nick
so you never get sexually turned on by a cute girl if she started to kiss
you etc..? Ie no woody. how do you stop yourself? lets say a real cute girl
starts flirting with you etc.. you wont get turned on?
so a cute girl flirting and touching you would not turn you on sexually
unless you dated for weeks and then maybe you might get turned on and
interested in sex?
Duh. Of course I would. That doesn't mean I'm going to lead her off to
the nearest hotel.
Some folks want someone long term. It is harde enough to find a nice person to
screw without trying to find a new one every other week.
~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!~
Please be advised: I am a bot and u are a parte of my sociology experiment.
There's a difference between being turned on and actually having sex.
Nick
but wont you get the I must ravish her body and enjoy her tonight?
That's not an actual sentence.
But it makes so much sense, doesn't it? Hugo always writes
in a way which is more poetry than prose.
But it makes so much sense, doesn't it? Hugo always writes
Yeah, I can relate. I want to have sex -- in principle -- but actually
thinking about it in concrete terms scares the shit out of me.