Just had an idea!
Eleonore Beaudoin
Printing them the right size to fit in frames I have....
Dunno if it would look nice though....paper...:(
Maybe I could have some made...But enlaged 9 by 12 might be too spensive...
Anyway. That is a thought to fiddle with.
Vitara
> Maybe I can use the flower pics to make presents...For kiddo and sweet hald...
> Printing them the right size to fit in frames I have....
Yes. Funny, that last evening on the bus someone got on with a large
wall almost-bulletin board 1 meter x 1 1/4 meter. It had 12 or
15+ pictures here and there. Matted(?). The pictures (of ppl) were
well separated.
I asked where it was bought. She said WalMart and $20 . I gave it
considerable thought.
PS'and pigeon-pictures :) Of any of your pix, three ca. of
pigeons have been the most startling and colourful and sensuous. :)
> Dunno if it would look nice though....paper...:(
Oh! IMHO paper from a PC printer is a <new aesthetic>, and has much
possibility. It can be larger in area, compared to photo prints.
Thus the one photographing and one editing can have more, in number,
to hand out; and IMHO more detail is possibly. For equal money, that
is.
The absence of gloss allows more detail to be seen.
Perhaps more editorial effort is needed. Culling and all.
Although I am intimidated by Photo/Shop-like ap^s, maybe some of
that would be easy.
It (paper) is a new medium. I am not thinking chintzy, but thinking
wide and shallow. If one has $15 for a project, or $32 or ? then the
paper is, in my opinion, an option.
And I am thinking framing is, for some, becoming less pretentious.
Doing matting oneself.
Once when living in a small room I was given a set of art-
reproductions. I realized I should do a "revolving exhibition." As a
museum with part "stock" in basement.
The severalness of the PC-printer copies causes me to mention this.
> Maybe I could have some made...But enlaged 9 by 12 might be too spensive...
> Anyway. That is a thought to fiddle with.
; V.