Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: cafffeine

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Bob

unread,
May 11, 2009, 5:55:48 AM5/11/09
to
On Sun, 10 May 2009 17:35:01 -0700 (PDT), Suri Cruise <with...@aol.com>
wrote:

|>On May 5, 9:34?am, "Chuck" <ch...@canada.ca> wrote:
|>> This has probably been asked before but I can't seem to locate any recent
|>> information on this. Apparently coffee has an advantageous side effect,
|>> amongst others, in that it has been shown to be helpful in reducing liver
|>> cancer in people with hepatitis C. That aside, caffeine is a diuretic.
|>
|>I don't believe in chronic use caffeine has any significant diruetic
|>effect at all.

I drink 12 cups of coffee a day, no laitier/dairy, chain smoke with
13 cups of kool aid a day. I eat regularly and quite well.

I proly do this for energy, since hep-b-c+, with venal
vaso-constriction is quite similar to "laytalk yellow jaundice" and robs a
lot of sympathetic energy out of your system

Sure I go to the Loo for a leek about 15X a day, but all this is
what my body seems to like......seems to filter out clear as expected.

My *creat* is fine in spite of a 1988 Nephrectomy or was it a rip
off....they said they found renal cancer...no x-rays just say so....I do
get suckered into some don't I.

.....If it feels good, DO IT.....right? why not you only "live"
once....



--
Triad Productions-Fantalla~EZine~ParaNovel
National Association of Assault Research
(http://*remove*members.fortunecity.com/vampire34/htmlconc.html)

mainframetech

unread,
May 11, 2009, 1:37:10 PM5/11/09
to
On May 11, 5:55 am, Bob <sci_...@health.info> wrote:

Everyone's system is a little different from the others. Some can
handle one regime and not another. Each person has to try different
things out carefully and see what works for them. While it is
sometimes recommended to visit a doctor, one has to keep their health
firmly in their own hands. Doctors are human and make mistakes and
miss things. Look at the statistic that almost 100,000 people lose
their lives at hospitals just from medical personnel errors.

And I don't doubt that many are losing their lives or health to
what is not known about newer drugs being advertised. The drug
companies have gotten such huge profits that now they have to keep up
that level of income. That means they may take shortcuts to get
products on the market and being used. An example is Vioxx. Although
it's been shown to kill some people, they still advertise and sell it,
just with a more carefully worded warning. Of course, the FDA is very
helpful in these cases.

Good luck,
Chris


0 new messages