I think I owe Mr. Texas an apology having assumed that he married three times under another name. (But he still is not the original, Marty)
Barbara loves Marty
seens to be indeed Mark Charles Rathbun, that means that if he married
Cheray, Ann, and Monique under that name, he didn't marry them under a
false name.
Mr. Texas, I am sorry having posted that your name is not Mark Charles
Rathbun. I never make false accussations. I was truly believing that
your name can't be Mark Rathbun too because you are not the Marty who
I know.
But I am still right that you are not the original Marty Rathbun.
Even if many years passed since I have seen him, you still are not
him.
But be reminded that the original Marty and I married each other in
the UK, then our memory banks were emptied by German psychs, then we
both married other people as we could not remember each other, but
then meet again. He had his memory discovered by then, when I met him
again in Los Angeles, but I didn't.It took me approx. two years more
to recall what has happened. It is really hard when your memory is
gone. It is like having to pick up something but no hand to do it or
it is even more difficult.
Now get this: the original Marty wasn't married to Cheray or Ann.
While I was married to Jurgen, he was married to Carol - not a redhead
like Cheray and not a brunette as Ann but a tall blonde woman.
Carol Rathbun worked at Gold. I assume that when the original Marty
was wrongfully arrested, she divorced him and married somebody else
and has now another name.
So what is really going on?
The CIA (under secret command of a German secret service) arranges at
the birth of Mark de Rothschild to give him the "security name" Mark
Charles Rathbun and arranges same time that Mr. Texas is named Mark
Charles Rathbun too because they have planned to exchange them with
each other one day because they clone people and know how they look
like when they are adults?
In that case, should Mr. Texas not be like a twin brother to the
original Marty and help him out of his wrongful incarceration and help
him that I can be back with him? Isn't that what brothers would do
even if they never have met?
You tell me.
Two people, with the same name, very similar looks having the same job
in Scientology (Inspector General for Ethics) but different expression
behind the eyes, different ways to talk, different posture and
different wives.
Just tell me the truth and get it over with.
Barbara Schwarz
Gregory Hall
news:ac1ae157-a45d-4c3f...@s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
> According to that official document that is webbed, Mr. Texas' name
> seens to be indeed Mark Charles Rathbun, that means that if he married
> Cheray, Ann, and Monique under that name, he didn't marry them under a
> false name.
Anybody can come up with bogus papers that appear to be real. . .
Obama even does it with his bogus birth certificate.
DNA is the only way to know for sure if Mr. Texas is an imposter. Barbara,
you owe it to yourself to get ahold of some of his DNA, have it analyzed and
compared to some de. Rothschild DNA. Unless it's a very close match then he
is a fraud.
A woman of your charms and skills certainly should be able to figure out a
way to get ahold of some of Mr. Texas's DNA. Hair from a comb, saliva from a
napkin, a little blood, some semen. In his case perhaps even some lipstick
from the neck of a long neck Budweiser.
--
Gregory Hall
Hein. T. Schaylich
"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:3a0t9o....@news.alt.net...
My money's on semen.
Barbara loves Marty
> "Barbara loves Marty" <barbaralovesmarty...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:ac1ae157-a45d-4c3f...@s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
>
> > According to that official document that is webbed, Mr. Texas' name
> > seens to be indeed Mark Charles Rathbun, that means that if he married
> > Cheray, Ann, and Monique under that name, he didn't marry them under a
> > false name.
>
> Anybody can come up with bogus papers that appear to be real. . .
That document that says that the name of Mr. Texas (back then Mr.
California) is also Mark Rathbun. The document is over 40 years. I am
sure he has not fabricated that and it was posted by his enemies. I am
sure Mr. Texas suffered a lot under that psychiatry didn't safe his
Mom. She was the daughter of a famous artist. His Grandpa was a gifted
painter. He drew the Quaker man on the Quaker Oats and Santas, really
nice and uplifting art. I strongly assume she was targeted and
probably implanted by psychs to jump.
But all that aside, there is no justification not to tell me what
became of the original Marty Rathbun in Scientology who is not Mr.
Texas.
>
> Obama even does it with his bogus birth certificate.
>
> DNA is the only way to know for sure if Mr. Texas is an imposter. Barbara,
> you owe it to yourself to get ahold of some of his DNA, have it analyzed and
> compared to some de. Rothschild DNA. Unless it's a very close match then he
> is a fraud.
I don't need DNA tests to determine who my Marty is. I can see that
right away.
If some doctors cloned with de Rothschild DNA, Mr. Texas could be a
match too.
But it is not about DNA tests but about coming forward where the
original Marty is.
>
> A woman of your charms and skills certainly should be able to figure out a
> way to get ahold of some of Mr. Texas's DNA. Hair from a comb, saliva from a
> napkin, a little blood, some semen. In his case perhaps even some lipstick
> from the neck of a long neck Budweiser.
What makes you think he wears lipstick?
I don't need any DNA test because I can see immediately who my Prince
is and who not.
Mr. Texas has gone public but my Prince is still missing.
Barbara Schwarz
>
> --
> Gregory Hall
Barbara loves Marty
wrote:
> "Gregory Hall" <gregh...@home.fake> schrieb im Newsbeitragnews:3a0t9o....@news.alt.net...
>
>
>
> > "Barbara loves Marty" <barbaralovesmarty...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:ac1ae157-a45d-4c3f...@s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
> >> According to that official document that is webbed, Mr. Texas' name
> >> seens to be indeed Mark Charles Rathbun, that means that if he married
> >> Cheray, Ann, and Monique under that name, he didn't marry them under a
> >> false name.
>
> > Anybody can come up with bogus papers that appear to be real. . .
>
> > Obama even does it with his bogus birth certificate.
>
> > DNA is the only way to know for sure if Mr. Texas is an imposter. Barbara,
> > you owe it to yourself to get ahold of some of his DNA, have it analyzed
> > and compared to some de. Rothschild DNA. Unless it's a very close match
> > then he is a fraud.
>
> > A woman of your charms and skills certainly should be able to figure out a
> > way to get ahold of some of Mr. Texas's DNA. Hair from a comb, saliva from
> > a napkin, a little blood, some semen. In his case perhaps even some
> > lipstick from the neck of a long neck Budweiser.
>
> > --
> > Gregory Hall
>
> My money's on semen.
One defamer idiot more who doesn't know me.
Barbara Schwarz
Out_Of_The_Dark
You know something Barbara, according to Hubbard, when people die,
they forget who they were, too. So If you were to die today, you would
no longer be Mrs Marty Rathbun. You'd get, according to scientology, a
new body and new name and a new family and new life to live. You
wouldn't necessarily marry the same person as the last lifetime, as it
is rare if possible at all. You might not even know what gender you'd
be born to, depending upon how able you were when you died.
Just something to think about.
Barbara loves Marty
> On Nov 18, 8:45 pm, Barbara lovesMarty
>
>
>
> <barbaralovesmarty...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > According to that official document that is webbed, Mr. Texas' name
> > Cheray, Ann, and Monique under that name, he didn't marry them under a
> > false name.
>
> > Mr. Texas, I am sorry having posted that your name is not Mark Charles
> >Rathbun. I never make false accussations. I was truly believing that
> > your name can't be MarkRathbuntoo because you are not theMartywho
> > I know.
>
> > But I am still right that you are not the originalMartyRathbun.
>
> > Even if many years passed since I have seen him, you still are not
> > him.
>
> > the UK, then our memory banks were emptied by German psychs, then we
> > both married other people as we could not remember each other, but
> > then meet again. He had his memory discovered by then, when I met him
> > again in Los Angeles, but I didn't.It took me approx. two years more
> > to recall what has happened. It is really hard when your memory is
> > gone. It is like having to pick up something but no hand to do it or
> > it is even more difficult.
>
> > While I was married to Jurgen, he was married to Carol - not a redhead
> > like Cheray and not a brunette as Ann but a tall blonde woman.
>
> > was wrongfully arrested, she divorced him and married somebody else
> > and has now another name.
>
> > So what is really going on?
>
> > The CIA (under secret command of a German secret service) arranges at
> > the birth of Mark de Rothschild to give him the "security name" Mark
> > CharlesRathbuntoo because they have planned to exchange them with
> > each other one day because they clone people and know how they look
> > like when they are adults?
>
> > In that case, should Mr. Texas not be like a twin brother to the
> > him that I can be back with him? Isn't that what brothers would do
> > even if they never have met?
>
> > You tell me.
>
> > Two people, with the same name, very similar looks having the same job
> > in Scientology (Inspector General for Ethics) but different expression
> > behind the eyes, different ways to talk, different posture and
> > different wives.
>
> > Just tell me the truth and get it over with.
>
> > Barbara Schwarz
>
> You know something Barbara, according to Hubbard, when people die,
> they forget who they were, too. So If you were to die today, you would
> no longer be MrsMartyRathbun.
So, what are you suggesting? That I should die? I have no urgent
plans... :)
I do not suffer under loving Marty, Mary. All the opposite, I love
loving him. I suffer being separated from him but not about that I
love him, this is the absolutely great thing.
You say that you know Scientology but you make it so much smaller than
it is.
Marty, my prince and I do not just know each other from this lifetime
but we know each other from our former lifetimes.
A Scientologists in Munich once told me that he married a woman that
he knew all over his timetrack but that they were never good to each
other so his marriage became another disaster.
With Marty and I, it is very different. We know each other all
timetrack long and we always were true to each other, loyal, good and
tried to help each other as good as we could.
If you knew somebody from former lifetimes, and particularly, if it is
your soulmate, you are immediately attracted and fascinated by that
person. It is love on the first glance but it just works when the
thetan that you know is indeed in or around that body. A doppelganger
might have the outer features too but he is not the person and has
another charisma and the attraction and fascination isn't there. It is
really all about the thetan.
In other words, Mary, the original Marty had me at Hello and this will
happen in any future lifetime again and again. The only lifetime, in
which I will not be Mrs. Marty is when he will be closely related to
me in a lifetime.
> You'd get, according to scientology, a
> new body and new name and a new family and new life to live.
L. Ron Hubbard explained why people forget their past lives: because
there are electronic ways to implant a person between lives. (E.g.
Repeated tapes and command played in a person's mind to make him or
her forget the past.) And without this, it would be easy to remember
past lives.
>You
> wouldn't necessarily marry the same person as the last lifetime, as it
> is rare if possible at all.
I don't think it is that rare that people meet each other again in a
new lifetime. It is more likely that they were not good enough to each
other and that takes away from the fascination and devotion when you
meet a person again. People meet but they made no breathtaking
impression on each other so them meeting again in a new lifetime will
be really exciting as the earth moving event that happened when Marty
and I laid eyes again on each other.
>You might not even know what gender you'd
> be born to, depending upon how able you were when you died.
That is not what L. Ron Hubbard said, Mary.
You have also the choice not to take any body at all and if you take a
body, you have absolutely the choice to chose the gender. It is a
mistake to rush in a body not being sure what gender it is. That is
the reason for homosexuality. People with a male timetrack rushing in
a body before they can see it's a female body and the other way
around. And then they are are men who are attracted to men or women
who are attracted to women because that is what they were in former
lifetimes.
>
> Just something to think about.
Scientology as by L. Ron Hubbard is much more effective than what you
think it is, Mary. Is is about overcoming implants, recognizing each
other, knowing the past and predicting the future and having a good
future.
As a sum: Individuals who loved each other truly in this lifetime,
will also love each other again in future lifetime.
No chance to kill the love in their hearts.
Barbara Schwarz