GAY FOSTER MOLESTER getting 200 to life
Greegor
that gays are ""safe"" around kids?
Or was somebody in the agencies actually a confederate
feeding this PEDERAST little boys to ""indoctrinate""
into their lifestyle?
On Aug 8, 8:42 pm, Porkey McBride <mac1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> CPS is a buttfuckers dream. Sheesh.
>
> ---------
> "The fascinating thing about this case is that the guy was molesting
> these foster kids and the county kept handing the kids over to him,"
> said Gero.
>
> Gero said the defense attorney said the case was a conspiracy against
> Dominguez because he was gay. "His partner was living with him when the
> molestations happened," said Gero.
>
> ============================
>
> Ex-foster dad convicted of sex abuse
>
> Dominguez may get life in prison for 1999 incidents
> By MARSHA DORGAN
> Register Staff Writer
> Tuesday, August 07, 2007
>
> Renaldo David Dominguez, a former Napa foster parent, is looking at 200
> years to life in prison.
>
> Last week a jury convicted Dominguez, 58, of 19 counts of child
> molestation, including oral copulation and sodomy. The crimes involved
> three male victims who were foster children in Dominguez's care. The
> sexual abuse happened in 1999 in Napa.
>
> In 1999, the Napa County District Attorney's Office filed 15 counts of
> child molestation against Dominguez involving one of his foster
> children, who was 8 at the time.
>
> During the court appearances prior to setting a trial date, the defense
> attorney asked for several continuances, according to court records. The
> case dragged on for about four years. Because of the time delay, in
> 2003, Napa County Superior Judge Stephen Kroyer dismissed the charges
> against Dominguez, making him a free man.
>
> The district attorney's office then petitioned the state attorney
> general's office to look into Kroyer's ruling, said Napa County Deputy
> District Attorney Paul Gero, who prosecuted the case.
>
> Ultimately, prosecutors appealed the ruling and a court of appeals
> overturned it, allowing prosecutors to reinstate the charges against
> Dominguez.
>
> Gero and district attorney investigator Mike Frey began working the case
> once more in 2006.
>
> "We brought in Napa Police detective Don Winegar who was on the first
> arrest," Gero said. "We found five other victims. The crimes against
> three of them were too old to prosecute, but two of those victims
> testified at the trial."
>
> "The fascinating thing about this case is that the guy was molesting
> these foster kids and the county kept handing the kids over to him,"
> said Gero.
>
> Gero said the defense attorney said the case was a conspiracy against
> Dominguez because he was gay. "His partner was living with him when the
> molestations happened," said Gero.
>
> Dominguez is scheduled to be sentenced on Sept. 4.
Dan Sullivan
> Did they just get carried away with the social worker mentality
> that gays are ""safe"" around kids?
The guy likes male children.
I believe that makes him a pedophile.
> Or was somebody in the agencies actually a confederate
> feeding this PEDERAST little boys to ""indoctrinate""
> into their lifestyle?
Post the answer when you know, Greg.
Greegor
G > mentality that gays are ""safe"" around kids?
DS > The guy likes male children.
He likes males of different ages for sex.
Did you miss that he's an "out" gay man who molested little boys?
Try actually reading the article Dan!
DS > I believe that makes him a pedophile.
He perpetrated anal sex on numbers of boys.
That's where pedophilia becomes Child Molestation.
In this particular case, PEDERASTY.
G > Or was somebody in the agencies actually a confederate
G > feeding this PEDERAST little boys to ""indoctrinate""
G > into their lifestyle?
DS > Post the answer when you know, Greg.
What do you have to contribute to this message thread Dan?
Dan Sullivan
news:1186694295....@q3g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>G > Did they just get carried away with the social worker
> G > mentality that gays are ""safe"" around kids?
>
> DS > The guy likes male children.
>
> He likes males of different ages for sex.
It only listed the age of one boy... eight.
Where did you see "males of different ages?"
> Did you miss that he's an "out" gay man who molested little boys?
> Try actually reading the article Dan!
That's what his defense attny claimed.
We don't know when he said it.
And it doesn't mean CPS or the foster people knew.
> DS > I believe that makes him a pedophile.
>
> He perpetrated anal sex on numbers of boys.
I didn't see anal sex mentioned in the article.
> That's where pedophilia becomes Child Molestation.
> In this particular case, PEDERASTY.
>
> G > Or was somebody in the agencies actually a confederate
> G > feeding this PEDERAST little boys to ""indoctrinate""
> G > into their lifestyle?
>
> DS > Post the answer when you know, Greg.
>
> What do you have to contribute to this message thread Dan?
This... GFYS Greg!
Greegor
> "Greegor" <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Why are you upset that this story got out Dan?
Greegor
DS > I didn't see anal sex mentioned in the article.
Did you miss the word sodomy Dan?
He was a GAY FOSTER BUTT PIRATE!
Does it bother you that this story got out Dan?
Dan Sullivan
> G > He perpetrated anal sex on numbers of boys.
> DS > I didn't see anal sex mentioned in the article.
> Did you miss the word sodomy Dan?
No.
Anal sex is only half the definition.
> He was a GAY FOSTER BUTT PIRATE!
And a friend of your's, Greg?
> Does it bother you that this story got out Dan?
GFYS, greg.
Greegor
DS > This... GFYS Greg!
LOL
Greegor
You might recognize some of them!
DAN SULLIVAN'S DAUGHTER SAID
"My daddy touched me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
Was your daughter telling a LIE when she said this?
Were you telling a lie when you POSTED THIS, Dan?
Did the caseworkers whack off to your
daughter's "credible evidence" Dan?
You touched your own little girl, didn't you Dan?
And you were FOUNDED for it but later you
got them to UNFOUND it, right?
Was there credible evidence that you touched your
little girl in the bathroom?
Did you use your bare hands Dan?
Where was the little girl's mother during this?
Did the little girl's mother know you were doing this?
Did you hand your little girl a TOWEL afterwards?
What state of undress were you in when you touched her?
Why did you need to be in the bathroom when your little girl was in
there?
How old was she when you did this to your own little girl?
When a person reverses a FOUNDED decision
does that DISPROVE the accusation, Dan?
Did you ever hear the caseworker expressions:
"Unfounded doesn't mean untrue." or
"Children don't lie." ?
Greegor
firemonkey
I have something to contribute:
Hooray for greg,
Hooray at last.
Hooray for greg he's a horse's ass!
Him!
Him!
F him!
Greegor
G > What do you have to contribute to this message thread Dan?
DS > This... GFYS Greg!
Dan Sullivan
Are you implying the county was aware of the molestations and sent
children there anyway?
Got proof?
Greegor
> I have some questions for you Dan Sullivan!
> You might recognize some of them!
>
> DAN SULLIVAN'S DAUGHTER SAID
> "My daddy touched me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
>
> Was your daughter telling a LIE when she said this?
> Were you telling a lie when you POSTED THIS, Dan?
>
> Did the caseworkers whack off to your
> daughter's "credible evidence" Dan?
>
> You touched your own little girl, didn't you Dan?
>
> And you were FOUNDED for it but later you
> got them to UNFOUND it, right?
>
> Was there credible evidence that you touched your
> little girl in the bathroom?
>
> Did you use your bare hands Dan?
>
> Where was the little girl's mother during this?
>
> Did the little girl's mother know you were doing this?
>
> Did you hand your little girl a TOWEL afterwards?
>
> What state of undress were you in when you touched her?
>
> Why did you need to be in the bathroom when your little girl was in
> there?
>
> How old was she when you did this to your own little girl?
How many times did you do this Dan?
Greegor
> I have some questions for you Dan Sullivan!
> You might recognize some of them!
>
> DAN SULLIVAN'S DAUGHTER SAID
> "My daddy touched me with the puppet bear in the toilet."
>
> Was your daughter telling a LIE when she said this?
> Were you telling a lie when you POSTED THIS, Dan?
>
> Did the caseworkers whack off to your
> daughter's "credible evidence" Dan?
>
> You touched your own little girl, didn't you Dan?
>
> And you were FOUNDED for it but later you
> got them to UNFOUND it, right?
>
> Was there credible evidence that you touched your
> little girl in the bathroom?
>
> Did you use your bare hands Dan?
>
> Where was the little girl's mother during this?
>
> Did the little girl's mother know you were doing this?
>
> Did you hand your little girl a TOWEL afterwards?
>
> What state of undress were you in when you touched her?
>
> Why did you need to be in the bathroom when your little girl was in
> there?
>
> How old was she when you did this to your own little girl?
How many times did you do this Dan?
> When a person reverses a FOUNDED decision
Greegor
G > mentality that gays are ""safe"" around kids?
DS > The guy likes male children.
DS > It only listed the age of one boy... eight.
DS > Where did you see "males of different ages?"
G > Did you miss that he's an "out" gay man who molested little boys?
G > Try actually reading the article Dan!
DS > That's what his defense attny claimed.
DS > We don't know when he said it.
DS > And it doesn't mean CPS or the foster people knew.
But they sent him kids after they did!
DS > I believe that makes him a pedophile.
G > He perpetrated anal sex on numbers of boys.
DS > I didn't see anal sex mentioned in the article.
What did you think SODOMY means Dan?
G > That's where pedophilia becomes Child Molestation.
G > In this particular case, PEDERASTY.
G > Or was somebody in the agencies actually a confederate
G > feeding this PEDERAST little boys to ""indoctrinate""
G > into their lifestyle?
DS > Post the answer when you know, Greg.
G > What do you have to contribute to this message thread Dan?
DS > This... GFYS Greg!
"The fascinating thing about this case is that the guy was molesting
these foster kids and the county kept handing the kids over to him,"
(Prosecutor Gero!)
DS > Are you implying the county was aware of the
DS > molestations and sent children there anyway?
That's what Prosecutor Gero said!
DS > Got proof?
Ask Prosecutor Gero, but I bet the county he
works for is unhappy with him for saying that out loud!
You sure seem unwilling to believe that bureaucracy
can be that stupid.
Most citizens KNOW bureaucracy is that stupid!
firemonkey
I'm sure you find it fascinating too greg, I find it disgusting and
heartbreaking.
Dan Sullivan
> G > Did they just get carried away with the social worker
> G > mentality that gays are ""safe"" around kids?
> DS > The guy likes male children.
> G > He likes males of different ages for sex.
> DS > It only listed the age of one boy... eight.
> DS > Where did you see "males of different ages?"
> G > Did you miss that he's an "out" gay man who molested little boys?
> G > Try actually reading the article Dan!
> DS > That's what his defense attny claimed.
> DS > We don't know when he said it.
> DS > And it doesn't mean CPS or the foster people knew.
>
> But they sent him kids after they did!
Post the evidence of that.
> DS > I believe that makes him a pedophile.
> G > He perpetrated anal sex on numbers of boys.
> DS > I didn't see anal sex mentioned in the article.
> What did you think SODOMY means Dan?
Sodomy means other things, too.
> G > That's where pedophilia becomes Child Molestation.
> G > In this particular case, PEDERASTY.
>
> G > Or was somebody in the agencies actually a confederate
> G > feeding this PEDERAST little boys to ""indoctrinate""
> G > into their lifestyle?
>
> DS > Post the answer when you know, Greg.
>
> G > What do you have to contribute to this message thread Dan?
> DS > This... GFYS Greg!
>
> "The fascinating thing about this case is that the guy was molesting
> these foster kids and the county kept handing the kids over to him,"
> (Prosecutor Gero!)
Gero doesn't say 'The county knew the guy was molesting foster kids
and handing the kids over to him.'
YOU are reading that into what was said, Greg.
> DS > Are you implying the county was aware of the
> DS > molestations and sent children there anyway?
>
> That's what Prosecutor Gero said!
No, he didn't.
> DS > Got proof?
>
> Ask Prosecutor Gero,
I'll take that as a 'no.'
Dan Sullivan
> G > Did they just get carried away with the social worker
> G > mentality that gays are ""safe"" around kids?
> DS > The guy likes male children.
> G > He likes males of different ages for sex.
> DS > It only listed the age of one boy... eight.
> DS > Where did you see "males of different ages?"
> G > Did you miss that he's an "out" gay man who molested little boys?
> G > Try actually reading the article Dan!
> DS > That's what his defense attny claimed.
> DS > We don't know when he said it.
> DS > And it doesn't mean CPS or the foster people knew.
> But they sent him kids after they did!
Post the evidence of that.
> DS > I believe that makes him a pedophile.
> G > He perpetrated anal sex on numbers of boys.
> DS > I didn't see anal sex mentioned in the article.
> What did you think SODOMY means Dan?
Sodomy means other things, too.
> G > That's where pedophilia becomes Child Molestation.
> G > In this particular case, PEDERASTY.
> G > Or was somebody in the agencies actually a confederate
> G > feeding this PEDERAST little boys to ""indoctrinate""
> G > into their lifestyle?
> DS > Post the answer when you know, Greg.
> G > What do you have to contribute to this message thread Dan?
> DS > This... GFYS Greg!
> "The fascinating thing about this case is that the guy was molesting
> these foster kids and the county kept handing the kids over to him,"
> (Prosecutor Gero!)
Gero doesn't say 'The county knew the guy was molesting foster kids
and still handed the kids over to him.'
YOU are reading that into what was said, Greg.
> DS > Are you implying the county was aware of the
> DS > molestations and sent children there anyway?
> That's what Prosecutor Gero said!
No, he didn't.
> DS > Got proof?
> Ask Prosecutor Gero,
I'll take that as a 'no.'
krp
"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:1186837887.7...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
Usually, Danny, anal sex is called sodomy. When it is used otherwise by
half-wits they can mean other things. But they are wrong. Look at all the
idiots who TRY to argue that a "blow-job" is NOT sex. Including a former
President.
Dan Sullivan
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
Anal sex may always be sodomy.
But sodomy isn't always anal sex.
> When it is used otherwise by
> half-wits they can mean other things. But they are wrong.
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/sodomy
Merriam-Webster Incorporated is wrong?
sod·omy
Pronunciation: 'sä-d&-mE
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French sodomie, from Late Latin
Sodoma Sodom; from the homosexual proclivities of the men of the city
in Genesis 19:1-11
: anal or oral copulation with a member of the same or opposite sex,
also : copulation with an animal
> Look at all the
> idiots who TRY to argue that a "blow-job" is NOT sex. Including a former
> President.
Irrelevant.
krp
http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/sodomy
Merriam-Webster Incorporated is wrong?
Irrelevant.
Dan sometimes common language dictionaries use expanded definitions. You
seem to MISS the derivation of ther word. From the town Of Sodom.
Homosexual proclivities for anal sex.
Stephanie
" krp" <web2...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:%wjvi.149$jy5.94@trnddc07...
The definition of sodomy according to the dictionary
sod搗m暄
n.
Any of various forms of sexual intercourse held to be unnatural or abnormal,
especially anal intercourse or bestiality.
firemonkey
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
I am amused at the way you continually reveal yourself pangborn.
Firemonkey
Dan Sullivan
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
Sometimes...
Usually...
Expanded?
The Merriam-Webster dictionary contains the expanded definition.
You want to limit the definition of sodomy to anal sex and ignore the
fact that the true definition INCLUDES oral sex... and sex with
animals.
> You
> seem to MISS the derivation of ther word. From the town Of Sodom.
> Homosexual proclivities for anal sex.
Irrelevant.
freedom
>> sod=B7omy
>> Pronunciation: 's=E4-d&-mE
>> Function: noun
>> Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French sodomie, from Late Latin
>> Sodoma Sodom; from the homosexual proclivities of the men of the city
>> in Genesis 19:1-11
>> : anal or oral copulation with a member of the same or opposite sex,
>> also : copulation with an animal
>>
>> > Look at all the
>> > idiots who TRY to argue that a "blow-job" is NOT sex. Including a former
>> > President.
>>
>> Irrelevant.
>>
>> Dan sometimes common language dictionaries use expanded definitions. You
>> seem to MISS the derivation of ther word. From the town Of Sodom.
>> Homosexual proclivities for anal sex.
>
>I am amused at the way you continually reveal yourself pangborn.
>
>Firemonkey
He does have a knack for walking right into these things. For example, a
few weeks ago when he was talking about his mail-order wife, and her
ability to "manage to get all of the men into the room in shifts."
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQA/AwUBRr3kIgu6zDezw650EQK3wwCg71NdQJhGEiHQTeN/9r2cnFeYshQAn0Ai
249GOVdSjh48lUPQl4sIL0gE
=bQBY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Greegor
> these foster kids and the county kept handing the kids over to him,"
> (Prosecutor Gero!)
Dan is quibbling about the definition of gay sex, sodomy, etc.
in a wierd attempt to distract from the NEWS STORY which
is about an out gay pederast child molester foster and agencies
that basically served as PIMP, sending him more kids
to SODOMIZE.
In the last few months a LOT of these PEDERASTS
have been exposed.
Dan Sullivan
> > "The fascinating thing about this case is that the guy was molesting
> > these foster kids and the county kept handing the kids over to him,"
> > (Prosecutor Gero!)
>
> Dan is quibbling about the definition of gay sex, sodomy, etc.
> in a wierd attempt to distract from the NEWS STORY which
> is about an out gay pederast child molester foster and agencies
> that basically served as PIMP, sending him more kids
> to SODOMIZE.
Greg you posted so much BS about this case.
Your usual MO.
> In the last few months a LOT of these PEDERASTS
> have been exposed.
But you were exposed as a child abuser YEARS ago, Greg.
Greegor
I have some questions for you Dan Sullivan!
firemonkey
firemonkey
krp
"Stephanie" <ha...@noway.net> wrote in message
news:UWjvi.1697$eb4.927@trndny08...
Most library dictionaries are non-technical. But that's about as close to
the actual as possible.
krp
Sometimes...
Usually...
Expanded?
Irrelevant.
That is nowhere near what I said.
krp
"freedom" <abou...@KRPaboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
news:c06ed542aba63c00...@pseudo.borked.net...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> He does have a knack for walking right into these things. For example, a
> few weeks ago when he was talking about his mail-order wife, and her
> ability to "manage to get all of the men into the room in shifts."
At least I got a good night's sleep last night Davey. Gave up on
telephone harassment, eh dipshit?
Greegor
> The definition of sodomy according to the dictionary
> Any of various forms of sexual intercourse held to be unnatural or
> abnormal, especially anal intercourse or bestiality.
krp > Most library dictionaries are non-technical.
krp > But that's about as close to the actual as possible.
The Foster Molester was CONVICTED
of Sodomy but Dan and Firemonkey want
to quibble for days about the exact
definition of Sodomy?
Why?
What kind of ongoing enterprise are you protecting Dan?
Dan Sullivan
What would the perv have been convicted of if he engaged in oral sex
with the victims?
Sodomy, right?
Dan Sullivan
>
> > The definition of sodomy according to the dictionary
> > sod·om·y n.
> > Any of various forms of sexual intercourse held to be unnatural or
> > abnormal, especially anal intercourse or bestiality.
>
> krp > Most library dictionaries are non-technical.
> krp > But that's about as close to the actual as possible.
>
> The Foster Molester was CONVICTED
> of Sodomy but Dan and Firemonkey want
> to quibble for days about the exact
> definition of Sodomy?
So people don't think sodomy only means anal sex.
> Why?
So they aren't misinformed.
> What kind of ongoing enterprise are you protecting Dan?
What kind of ongoing enterprise could I be protecting by demonstrating
that by definition sodomy means oral sex as well as anal sex?
Greegor
If somebody had sodomized YOUR child, Dan,
would you be happier if it was one or the other?
![0:-]'s profile photo](http://lh3.googleusercontent.com/a-/ALV-UjWfxYkvOkkwbLOWpExoUjiZVjIIrjv2sX8xgAJfGvY7bulmJA=s40-c)
0:-]
wrote:
>On Aug 11, 8:54 pm, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
>> On Aug 11, 9:01 pm, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Stephanie wrote
>>
>> > > The definition of sodomy according to the dictionary
>> > > sod搗m暄 n.
>> > > Any of various forms of sexual intercourse held to be unnatural or
>> > > abnormal, especially anal intercourse or bestiality.
>>
>> > krp > Most library dictionaries are non-technical.
>> > krp > But that's about as close to the actual as possible.
>>
>> > The Foster Molester was CONVICTED
>> > of Sodomy but Dan and Firemonkey want
>> > to quibble for days about the exact
>> > definition of Sodomy?
>>
>> So people don't think sodomy only means anal sex.
>>
>> > Why?
>>
>> So they aren't misinformed.
>>
>> > What kind of ongoing enterprise are you protecting Dan?
>>
>> What kind of ongoing enterprise could I be protecting by demonstrating
>> that by definition sodomy means oral sex as well as anal sex?
>
>If somebody had sodomized YOUR child, Dan,
>would you be happier if it was one or the other?
What happiness do you see Dan exhibiting in his showing the definition
offered by others was inaccurate and incomplete?
I realize, of course, you aren't trying to debate, or be informed, or
help others be informed, and have nothing to contribute, but I thought
I could at least give you the chance to pretend to try you were.
You have been attacking Dan in a manner that you think is the same as
him pointing out what YOU have admitted to in these newsgroups, and
you are failing not just miserably, but to the further deteriment of
your own credibility...shakey as that has always been.
You can't see that of course, being stupid.
And yes, my garden is doing fine. I have seasonal activities that take
me away from my computer, and I know you have missed me, so I'll try
to check in now and then and comment on your more stupid attempts to
appear to pretend to hope to be smart.
0:]
Greegor
G > would you be happier if it was one or the other?
Panakakenkookoo (Kane) wrote
> What happiness do you see Dan exhibiting in his showing the definition
> offered by others was inaccurate and incomplete?
>
> I realize, of course, you aren't trying to debate, or be informed, or
> help others be informed, and have nothing to contribute, but I thought
> I could at least give you the chance to pretend to try you were.
>
> You have been attacking Dan in a manner that you think is the same as
> him pointing out what YOU have admitted to in these newsgroups, and
> you are failing not just miserably, but to the further deteriment of
> your own credibility...shakey as that has always been.
>
> You can't see that of course, being stupid.
>
> And yes, my garden is doing fine. I have seasonal activities that take
> me away from my computer, and I know you have missed me, so I'll try
> to check in now and then and comment on your more stupid attempts to
> appear to pretend to hope to be smart.
Kane, Did you ever ponder just how insignificant you really are?
Porkey McBride
Is English yer second launguage?
>
> I realize, of course, you aren't trying to debate, or be informed, or
> help others be informed, and have nothing to contribute, but I thought
> I could at least give you the chance to pretend to try you were.
Don, you CPS scumsucker. You ran off every parent but Greegor - you
stalked, defamed, harassed, and falsely accused every parent wgho ever
posted to ASCPS.
You spammed your states most vulnerable children to usenet perverts for
your own sick ends [now Oregon has a rash of buttfuckers raping boys] -
and now you want to rag Greg, the only contributing parent left after
your years of harassment, threats, and false accusations.
>
> You have been attacking Dan in a manner that you think is the same as
> him pointing out what YOU have admitted to in these newsgroups, and
> you are failing not just miserably, but to the further deteriment of
> your own credibility...shakey as that has always been.
Dan's a buttfucker. Your son the buttfucker.
>
> You can't see that of course, being stupid.
Talking about stupid, how's yer wife?
>
> And yes, my garden is doing fine. I have seasonal activities that take
> me away from my computer, and I know you have missed me, so I'll try
> to check in now and then and comment on your more stupid attempts to
> appear to pretend to hope to be smart.
You ran like a coward when we discovered you're a sick CPS worker with
incest and spanking issues.
Get some counseling now that you don't spent 6-8 hours a day posting to
this empty newsgroup. lol.
>
> 0:]
>
>
Dan Sullivan
Only a despicable child abusing pervert like yourself, Greg, could ask
a parent if they'd be HAPPIER if their child was sodomized in a
particular manner.
0:-]
wrote:
I've pondered how invested you are in attempting to neutralize the
effect I have on you when you fuck up.
and how incredibly stupid you are.
Then I ran out of interest.
0:]
Greegor
anal sex.
Apparently he wanted to distract from the out gay foster molester
conviction news story.
G > If somebody had sodomized YOUR child, Dan,
G > would you be happier if it was one or the other?
DS > Only a despicable child abusing pervert like Greg Hanson
DS > could ask a parent if they'd be HAPPIER if their child was
DS > sodomized in a particular manner.
If it's not important to you whether it was one or the other,
then why did you argue back and forth so much, OBSESSING
about the distinction Dan?
WHY are you so determined to distract from the
out gay foster molester conviction news story, Dan Sullivan?
Dan Sullivan
> Dan Sullivan argued obsessively about whether sodomy means oral or
> anal sex.
No, I didn't.
I simply wanted people to know the accurate and true definition of the
word.
> Apparently he wanted to distract from the out gay foster molester
> conviction news story.
Not at all.
> G > If somebody had sodomized YOUR child, Dan,
> G > would you be happier if it was one or the other?
Only YOU, Greg, would think happiness could be found by a parent if
their child was molested using one form of sodomy compared to
another.
GFYS.
> DS > Only a despicable child abusing pervert like Greg Hanson
> DS > could ask a parent if they'd be HAPPIER if their child was
> DS > sodomized in a particular manner.
>
> If it's not important to you whether it was one or the other,
> then why did you argue back and forth so much, OBSESSING
> about the distinction Dan?
Why do you search the internet looking for stories about children
being molested, Greg?
> WHY are you so determined to distract from the
> out gay foster molester conviction news story, Dan Sullivan?
I'm not.
Greegor
> On Aug 12, 7:12 pm, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 12, 7:28 am, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Dan Sullivan argued obsessively about whether sodomy means oral or
> > > anal sex.
>
> > > conviction news story.
>
> > > G > would you be happier if it was one or the other?
>
> > > DS > could ask a parent if they'd be HAPPIER if their child was
> > > DS > sodomized in a particular manner.
>
> > > If it's not important to you whether it was one or the other,
> > > then why did you argue back and forth so much, OBSESSING
> > > about the distinction Dan?
>
>
> Here you are, dipstick, for the second time...
DS > I simply want the definition to be accurate.
DS > The back and forth was from you and kenny boy attempting to
establish
DS > that sodomy only means anal sex... when obviously it's not.
What's not?
Gay buggery involves anal sex.
But even if it involved only oral sex, the
FOSTER MOLESTER is STILL GOING TO PRISON!
Your argument about ""accuracy"" doesn't
amount to a hill of beans. (post digestion or otherwise)
> Why are you obsessed with anal sex, Greg?
>
> And the molestation of little girls?
Greegor
G > whether sodomy means oral or anal sex.
DS > No, I didn't.
DS > I simply wanted people to know the
DS > accurate and true definition of the word.
G > Apparently he wanted to distract from the
G > out gay foster molester conviction news story.
DS > Not at all.
G > If somebody had sodomized YOUR child, Dan,
G > would you be happier if it was one or the other?
DS > Only YOU, Greg, would think happiness could
DS > be found by a parent if their child was molested
DS > using one form of sodomy compared to another.
DS > GFYS.
DS > Only a despicable child abusing pervert like Greg Hanson
DS > could ask a parent if they'd be HAPPIER if their child was
DS > sodomized in a particular manner.
G > If it's not important to you whether it was one or the other,
G > then why did you argue back and forth so much, OBSESSING
G > about the distinction Dan?
DS > Why do you search the internet looking for
DS > stories about children being molested, Greg?
Why don't you Dan?
Have you stopped claiming to be a Family Rights advocate?
You forgot to answer this question Dan!
Here it is again.
G > If it's not important to you whether it was one or the other,
G > then why did you argue back and forth so much, OBSESSING
G > about the distinction Dan?
G > WHY are you so determined to distract from the
G > out gay foster molester conviction news story, Dan Sullivan?
DS > I'm not.
Dan Sullivan
> On Aug 12, 10:27 pm, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Aug 12, 7:12 pm, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Aug 12, 7:28 am, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Dan Sullivan argued obsessively about whether sodomy means oral or
> > > > anal sex.
>
> > > > Apparently he wanted to distract from the out gay foster molester
> > > > conviction news story.
>
> > > > G > If somebody had sodomized YOUR child, Dan,
> > > > G > would you be happier if it was one or the other?
>
> > > > DS > Only a despicable child abusing pervert like Greg Hanson
> > > > DS > could ask a parent if they'd be HAPPIER if their child was
> > > > DS > sodomized in a particular manner.
>
> > > > If it's not important to you whether it was one or the other,
> > > > then why did you argue back and forth so much, OBSESSING
> > > > about the distinction Dan?
>
> > > Could you please answer the question Dan?
>
> > Here you are, dipstick, for the second time...
>
> DS > I simply want the definition to be accurate.
>
> DS > The back and forth was from you and kenny boy attempting to
> establish
> DS > that sodomy only means anal sex... when obviously it's not.
>
> What's not?
>
> Gay buggery involves anal sex.
Always?
> But even if it involved only oral sex, the
> FOSTER MOLESTER is STILL GOING TO PRISON!
I believe I said that a few days ago.
> Your argument about ""accuracy"" doesn't
> amount to a hill of beans. (post digestion or otherwise)
Why?
> > Why are you obsessed with anal sex, Greg?
>
> > And the molestation of little girls?
>
> I have some questions for you Dan Sullivan!
> You might recognize some of them!
Interesting that you chose not to deny your obsessions.
Dan Sullivan
> G > Dan Sullivan argued obsessively about
> G > whether sodomy means oral or anal sex.
>
> DS > No, I didn't.
> DS > I simply wanted people to know the
> DS > accurate and true definition of the word.
>
> G > Apparently he wanted to distract from the
> G > out gay foster molester conviction news story.
>
> DS > Not at all.
>
> G > If somebody had sodomized YOUR child, Dan,
> G > would you be happier if it was one or the other?
>
> DS > Only YOU, Greg, would think happiness could
> DS > be found by a parent if their child was molested
> DS > using one form of sodomy compared to another.
>
> DS > GFYS.
>
> DS > Only a despicable child abusing pervert like Greg Hanson
> DS > could ask a parent if they'd be HAPPIER if their child was
> DS > sodomized in a particular manner.
>
> G > If it's not important to you whether it was one or the other,
> G > then why did you argue back and forth so much, OBSESSING
> G > about the distinction Dan?
>
> DS > Why do you search the internet looking for
> DS > stories about children being molested, Greg?
>
> Why don't you Dan?
Why should I?
> Have you stopped claiming to be a Family Rights advocate?
No.
Greegor
Here it is again.
G > If it's not important to you whether it was one or the other,
G > then why did you argue back and forth so much, OBSESSING
G > about the distinction Dan?
DS > Why do you search the internet looking for
DS > stories about children being molested, Greg?
G > Why don't you Dan?
DS > Why should I?
You're a ""Family Rights advocate"" but you see no
utility in tracking and exposing FOSTER MOLESTATION
cases that are Public Relations disasters for CPS?
Why don't you see the utility in that, Dan?
G > Have you stopped claiming to be a Family Rights advocate?
DS > No.
Greegor
As opposed to the Child Protection INDUSTRY
that views children as a COMMODITY or as
a "profit center" you mean?
Dan Sullivan
Please correct me if I'm wrong, Greg, but don't you view Lisa's
daughter as a "profit center" considering the fact that you believe
you're going to win a lot of money because CPS placed her with her
grandparents?
0:-]
wrote:
>You forgot to answer this question Dan!
>Here it is again.
>
>G > If it's not important to you whether it was one or the other,
>G > then why did you argue back and forth so much, OBSESSING
>G > about the distinction Dan?
>
>
>DS > Why do you search the internet looking for
>DS > stories about children being molested, Greg?
>G > Why don't you Dan?
>DS > Why should I?
>
>You're a ""Family Rights advocate"" but you see no
>utility in tracking and exposing FOSTER MOLESTATION
>cases that are Public Relations disasters for CPS?
>
>Why don't you see the utility in that, Dan?
Name one CPS case that the successful return of the child to their
parents was based on tracking and exposing foster molestation cases
and causing public relations "disasters" for CPS, Greg.
You are a disrupter and time waster, busy distracting parents engaged
with CPS from their real goals...or what should be, until they have
their child back home.
>
>G > Have you stopped claiming to be a Family Rights advocate?
>DS > No.
Please point out, Greg, where PR disasters ever won a case for a
parent seeking to get their child back.
Pretending that Dan doesn't care about CPS screwups is exposing you
for the scummy little liar and thug you really are.
He makes them pay for their screwups by getting the children back to
the parents, and often even overturning the finding.
He focuses on the screwups that matter to the case.
You silly pissants whine and screech and moan and produce nothing.
Worse than nothing: distraction from the goal.
0:]
krp
>> Gay buggery involves anal sex.
>
> Always?
Always? Danny that's like saying heterosexual relations are "always" the
missionary position. Always? No! Mostly? Yes!
Dan Sullivan
So now you agree that sodomy isn't defined exclusively as anal sex.
That was my point.
Your debating skills are less than zero, kenny boy.
krp
>>>> Gay buggery involves anal sex.
>>>
>>> Always?
>>
>> Always? Danny that's like saying heterosexual relations are "always"
>> the missionary position. Always? No! Mostly? Yes!
>
> So now you agree that sodomy isn't defined exclusively as anal sex.
Depend on how "anal retentive" you are Danny. (Pardon the pun.) In a
realistic way it does when you consider the derivation of the word, as I
said from the start in COMMON ENGLISH it means several things. The most
strict meaning is anal sex between 2 men.
Dan Sullivan
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>
> news:1187095917....@g4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>
> >>>> Gay buggery involves anal sex.
>
> >>> Always?
>
> >> Always? Danny that's like saying heterosexual relations are "always"
> >> the missionary position. Always? No! Mostly? Yes!
>
> > So now you agree that sodomy isn't defined exclusively as anal sex.
>
> Depend on how "anal retentive" you are Danny. (Pardon the pun.) In a
> realistic way it does when you consider the derivation of the word, as I
> said from the start in COMMON ENGLISH it means several things.
That's not what you said, you said "Usually, Danny, anal sex is called
sodomy. When it is used otherwise by half-wits they can mean other
things. But they are wrong."
And oral sex is also sodomy.
Are DA's "half-wits" when they prosecute someone for sodomy because
they had oral sex with a child?
> The most strict meaning is anal sex between 2 men.
Britannica - Noncoital carnal copulation.
Law Encyclopedia - Anal or oral intercourse between human beings, or
any sexual relations between a human being and an animal, the act of
which may be punishable as a criminal offense.
The word sodomy has acquired different meanings over time. Under the
common law, sodomy consisted of anal intercourse. Traditionally courts
and statutes have referred to it as a "crime against nature" or as
copulation "against the order of nature." In the United States, the
term eventually encompassed oral sex as well as anal sex. The crime of
sodomy was classified as a felony.
0:-]
Now aren't you being a little obsessive, Dan?
After all, teaching a pig to fly is pointless, and just annoys the
pig. 0:]
Dan Sullivan
"0:-]" <pohak...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:j2c3c35ij0ah69fgr...@4ax.com...
He might learn something... eventually.
Ex; the complete definition.
Ex; how to debate without looking like a fool in the end, as kenny boy
did
in this instance.
0:-]
<dsul...@optonline.net> wrote:
When I hear "oinks" from the sky.
>Ex; the complete definition.
Anathema to this little piggie, Dan. The last thing he wants is to
held to actually considering all of an issue.
>Ex; how to debate without looking like a fool in the end, as kenny boy
>did in this instance.
Well, knowing how persistant you are, I suppose I should get a hat
with a bigger rim. And where can we buy pig diapers wholesale for
kennyboy?
Hi, kennyboy.
You learning anything yet?
Now kennyboy if THIS is how you conduct your arguments concerning your
"trial consulting" yes, Dan IS a "trial consultant," and you are not.
You aren't in his league, nor will you ever be.
0:]
Greegor
And since you claim to be a ""Family Rights advocate""
it really galls you to hear of somebody hurting the agencies?
Right Dan?
Dan Sullivan
You haven't hurt the agencies one bit, Greg.
In fact you've bolstered their credibility in Court and with everyone
who's ever been involved in Lisa's case.
IOW YOU, Greg, are the perfect example of why CPS exists... and needs
more funding!!!!
IOW YOU are the posterboy for CPS!!!
0:-]
wrote:
Can't speak for Dan other than I have observed here.
Dan appears to not be as invested in attacking CPS on a global scale
as you are, Greg.
This appears to fit with his focus on being a real family
advocate...that is, focusing on those things that would serve the
family in a face to face fight with CPS.
And that would be specific families.
As to his apparent response to "hurting the agencies," he appears to
know that we need CPS for thugs like you and worse.
With those two things in mind, Greg, show us how global attacks on CPS
helps a family that has come here, or to Dan, or to another person
here for help with CPS.
In fact, what YOU throw at people that just arrive here is clearly an
attempt to recruit them AWAY from their case, and into the poorly
organized, sadly impotent little club of typical anti authority, anti
government, anti society thugs like yourself.
You and they are pitiful.
Dan does more to reform CPS in a real sense than the lot of you put
together.
In fact you strengthen CPS by your lies and half truths, which are so
very easy to combat.
When a family, with Dan's help, gets there children back THAT REALLY
HURTS CPS.
Not your flaccid attacks they simply laugh at.
HAHAHAHAHA.
0:-]
Well, a bit more terse and too the point, in Greg's case, but then you
always did tend to focus on the close up and real, while I tend to
argue more in Greg's area...where he and his cronies not only lie, but
make hay for CPS.
If you wanted to get more children into state custody, for that "Child
Protection Industry," Greg screeches about, I can't think of a better
crew than his Quasi CPS Worker bunch.
Stupid, thy name be Greegor.
0:]
Greegor
> When a family, with Dan's help, gets there
> children back THAT REALLY HURTS CPS.
> Not your flaccid attacks they simply laugh at.
> HAHAHAHAHA.
(Clearly "they" are you!)
A huge payout doesn't get their attention?
Pretend that all you like!
0:-]
wrote:
Show the improved results for parents fighting CPS.
krp
Your reading seems no better than Kane's. I said COMMON usage had several
definitions. The DERIVATION of the word comes from the practice of anal
homosexual acts in the city of Sodom.
firemonkey
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
This is what you said kennie
>Usually, Danny, anal sex is called sodomy. When it is used otherwise by
> half-wits they can mean other things. But they are wrong. Look at all the
> idiots who TRY to argue that a "blow-job" is NOT sex. Including a former
> President.
Dan Sullivan
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
My reading is fine.
> I said COMMON usage had several
> definitions. The DERIVATION of the word comes from the practice of anal
> homosexual acts in the city of Sodom.
You said "Usually, Danny, anal sex is called sodomy. When it is used
0:-]
No you didn't.
"Usually, Danny, anal sex is called
sodomy. When it is used otherwise by half-wits they can mean other
things. But they are wrong."
The "but they are wrong," shows that you don't know what you are
talking about, and Dan does.
Sodomy refers to at least two other acts, oral sex, and bestiality.
No mention by you of 'common' occurred, krp. Until now.
>The DERIVATION of the word comes from the practice of anal
>homosexual acts in the city of Sodom.
That's true.
What year was that, and what year is this?
And how does this support any claims about the subject of this thread?
krp
"buttmonkey" <mehit...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1187123709.3...@x40g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
>> Your reading seems no better than Kane's. I said COMMON usage had several
>> definitions. The DERIVATION of the word comes from the practice of anal
>> homosexual acts in the city of Sodom.
>
> This is what you said kennie
>
>>Usually, Danny, anal sex is called sodomy. When it is used otherwise by
>> half-wits they can mean other things. But they are wrong. Look at all the
>> idiots who TRY to argue that a "blow-job" is NOT sex. Including a former
>> President.
And YOU see a conflict in the two statements? How utterly NOT
surprising.
krp
>> Your reading seems no better than Kane's.
> My reading is fine.
>> I said COMMON usage had several definitions. The DERIVATION of the word
>> comes from the practice of anal
>> homosexual acts in the city of Sodom.
> You said "Usually, Danny, anal sex is called sodomy. When it is used
> otherwise by half-wits they can mean other things. But they are
> wrong."
Usually Danny does not mean "ALWAYS" and forever!
krp
>>The DERIVATION of the word comes from the practice of anal
>>homosexual acts in the city of Sodom.
>
> That's true.
>
> What year was that, and what year is this?
Kane why don't you go back to telling me ALL ABOUT your VAST personal
experiences with Taxi stands outside EVERY farmhouse in Cuba so I can be
impressed with your vast fund of personal knowledge.
0:-]
No conflict was claimed, or denied.
Only that you had the definition wrong and attempted to sell it as the
only thing that can rightly be called 'sodomy.'
Sadly for children that are victims, YOUR minimizing is not true. But
at least if Dan's presenting most of the range of what is and isn't
sodomy, we see that there is more a perp can be prosecuted for.
Isn't that something you want?
Remember, as you contemplate what lie to propagate next, Greg is the
little asshole buddy of yours that asked Dan which would make a parent
happier, to have a child analy raped, or orally raped.
Then you stuck your stupid nasty mind into the mix, didn't you, sick
boy?
Didn't you.
0:]
Greegor
krp > the practice of anal homosexual acts in the city of Sodom.
> > That's true.
Kane wrote > What year was that, and what year is this?
krp > Kane why don't you go back to telling me
krp > ALL ABOUT your VAST personal experiences
krp > with Taxi stands outside EVERY farmhouse
krp > in Cuba so I can be impressed with your
krp > vast fund of personal knowledge.
LOL
0:-]
Correct. And you don't get the irony of your logic, right?
Try saying that second and third sentence out loud fast, ten times.
Or ask a 10th grade english teacher to explain literacy to you.
And the english language.
0:-]
>
>"0:-]" <pohak...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:9q64c3p6b4tpilo16...@4ax.com...
>
>>>The DERIVATION of the word comes from the practice of anal
>>>homosexual acts in the city of Sodom.
>>
>> That's true.
>>
>> What year was that, and what year is this?
>
> Kane why don't you go back to telling me ALL ABOUT your VAST personal
>experiences with Taxi stands outside EVERY farmhouse in Cuba
I couldn't do that, because I've never claimed I have any personal
knowledge, on site, as it were, with Cuba. I can read though. Can you?
> so I can be
>impressed with your vast fund of personal knowledge.
Sigh. You are going to provide some citations, right?
RRRR R R R R R R RR LMAO
krp
>> And YOU see a conflict in the two statements? How utterly NOT
>>surprising.
>
> No conflict was claimed, or denied.
>
> Only that you had the definition wrong and attempted to sell it as the
> only thing that can rightly be called 'sodomy.'
>
> Sadly for children that are victims, YOUR minimizing is not true. But
> at least if Dan's presenting most of the range of what is and isn't
> sodomy, we see that there is more a perp can be prosecuted for.
Sex acts on children are crimes regardless of the nomenclature and
diversionary rhetoric Kane. So pretentious.
krp
"Greegor" <Gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1187133952.3...@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
Yes Kane that's right. I find your claims of VAST personal knowledge of Cuba
to be LAUGHABLE!
krp
>> Kane why don't you go back to telling me ALL ABOUT your VAST personal
>>experiences with Taxi stands outside EVERY farmhouse in Cuba
>
> I couldn't do that, because I've never claimed I have any personal
> knowledge, on site, as it were, with Cuba. I can read though. Can you?
That you do NOT have ANY knowledge of Cuba sans your insipid search
engines is abundantly obvious Kane, however, in the past you CLAIMED to have
VAST personal knowledge from when you were an Air Force SECRET AGENT! And
the VAST amount of time you spent at Guantanamo.. Remember making that claim
Kane? When you were trying to prove you knew MORE about Cuba than I did.
0:-]
wrote:
Welcome to the debate on Cuba, Greg.
Since krp seems very reluctant to provide the proper linked citations
of my discussion on Cuba and transportation, and where I said there is
a 'Taxi stand outside every farmhouse,' possibly you can do it for
him.
You seemed to be a good researcher when it came to "Hipcrime."
This should be easy for you.
Help your buddy out. He seems to be floundering, again.
LOL
0:-]
... of you to argue that sodomy did not include other than anal sex.
And I don't need a lesson from you on what is and isn't sex crimes.
You seem woefully ignorant on the subject, going so far as to provide
a perfect model for finally using the anatomically correct dolls
correctly.
Remember who and what you quoted?
My god, krp, why would anyone hire someone so stupid as you?
>
>
0:-]
You seem attribution disabled. Greg wrote that.
And I invited him to do what you appear to stupid to do
yourself...provide properly linked citations to exactly what I did say
about taxi's, along with other transportation opportunities in Cuba.
You are trying the same tired trick you recently did with 'sodomy' and
it's definition...argument by absurd reduction to the point there IS
no argument any longer.
YOu actually stated that sex crimes against children are illegal.
I farted I laughed so hard.
Which of us here might not already know that, krp?
You are a dunce.
I guess you no longer have anything to lose, do you, krp?
You've so disgraced and discredited yourself in these and other
newsgroups over the years, you can say just about anything, lie
through your teeth, and it couldn't possibly do you more harm than you
already have done to yourself.
Moore has nothing on you, krp, for the destruction of krp, and the
Ateam.
Smart move.
0:]
0:-]
>
>"0:-]" <pohak...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:gge4c3p25ttima4he...@4ax.com...
>
>>> Kane why don't you go back to telling me ALL ABOUT your VAST personal
>>>experiences with Taxi stands outside EVERY farmhouse in Cuba
>>
>> I couldn't do that, because I've never claimed I have any personal
>> knowledge, on site, as it were, with Cuba. I can read though. Can you?
>
> That you do NOT have ANY knowledge of Cuba sans your insipid search
>engines is abundantly obvious Kane,
Of course. I so stated that was my source, and even posted long
citations with the proper links provided to any reader that wished to
check the credibility.
>however, in the past you CLAIMED to have
>VAST personal knowledge from when you were an Air Force SECRET AGENT!
About Cuba? Nope.
>And
>the VAST amount of time you spent at Guantanamo.. Remember making that claim
>Kane? When you were trying to prove you knew MORE about Cuba than I did.
Never claimed to have been at Gitmo. And never was. You are lying
again.
So here we go again...krp.
Have you a citation of my exact words to that effect? If so please
post. If not, admit you are wrong.
Lacking both, we'll simply assume, safely, that you are a liar. Still.
And I never really claimed I KNEW more, just that YOU were lying, and
I was looking for facts.
You still could have found a way to reach civilization, krp, and
posted a string of posts.
R RR R R R R R
Dan Sullivan
news:dxqwi.7063$xc5.346@trnddc06...> news:1187125648.1...@b79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>
>>> Your reading seems no better than Kane's.
>
>
>>> I said COMMON usage had several definitions. The DERIVATION of the word
>>> comes from the practice of anal
>>> homosexual acts in the city of Sodom.
>
>> otherwise by half-wits they can mean other things. But they are
>> wrong."
>
>
Try and keep to the subject, kenny boy, which was the legal definition
of
sodomy includes BOTH oral and anal sex.
All of your BS is recognized for just that, krg.
Dan Sullivan
> "0:-]" <pohaku.k...@gmail.com> wrote in message
You're the fool with the diversionary crap, kenny boy.
And for a guy who claims a "CUM LAUDE" BA degree and a "CUM LAUDE" MS
degree, you know zero about punctuation.
What was the title of your thesis?
0:-]
"How to make friends and influence people?"
Sorry, krp, that would have been plagiarized.
So, what was your theme, and where is the thesis, and what schools did
you matriculate from?
Thanks for the quick honest response, again.
0:]
>
krp
>>>> Your reading seems no better than Kane's.
>>
>>> My reading is fine.
>>
>>>> I said COMMON usage had several definitions. The DERIVATION of the word
>>>> comes from the practice of anal
>>>> homosexual acts in the city of Sodom.
>>
>>> You said "Usually, Danny, anal sex is called sodomy. When it is used
>>> otherwise by half-wits they can mean other things. But they are
>>> wrong."
>>
>>
>> Usually Danny does not mean "ALWAYS" and forever!
>
> Try and keep to the subject, kenny boy, which was the legal definition
> of
> sodomy includes BOTH oral and anal sex.
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Dan Sullivan
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
Does your response work well in a courtroom for your clients?
Or with CPS?
0:-]
What an odd response from a trial consultant and advocate for father's
rights.