Hi I wondered if anyone here sued for divorce over mate having cybersex with many other people. Mine did and he even discussed our sex life with his cyber partners. I accidently found his logs in the computer. It ruined our 25-year marriage. I had always thought he was faithful. I left him. Any one else have experience with this?
This happened to me. This is how I found out that my husband is a closet homosexual. He paid no attention to me and denied everything. Just said he had no sex drive, but was perusing the gay sites at all hours. Since then, things got worse between us. He is in a new relationship with a woman (trying to find himself, if you ask me) (and this woman is also a "secret") and we will be separating soon. It's very weird here!
I know I've looked at a lot of strange things when I was first introduced to the internet, just out of curiousity. But his primary interest has been the gay sites, but he says all that had to do with was a fantasy of his and that he is not gay or even bisexual.
He refuses to go to counseling so I'm trying to accept that it's over. Why would I want to be with a man I can't trust?
This whole cyberspace is starting to really sicken me.
> Hi > I wondered if anyone here sued for divorce over mate having cybersex with many > other people. Mine did and he even discussed our sex life with his cyber > partners. I accidently found his logs in the computer. It ruined our 25-year > marriage. I had always thought he was faithful. I left him. Any one else > have experience with this?
I accidentally found logs of conversations between my wife and a married guy in Sugarland, Texas. Although there was cybersex, what got me was the talk about how they were in love with each other. Although I don't blame the cyber stuff on the demise of our marriage, it played a significant role in our inability to work things out.
Rick
Astrid88 <astri...@aol.com> wrote in article <19971006124101.IAA24...@ladder02.news.aol.com>...
> Hi > I wondered if anyone here sued for divorce over mate having cybersex with many > other people. Mine did and he even discussed our sex life with his cyber > partners. I accidently found his logs in the computer. It ruined our 25-year > marriage. I had always thought he was faithful. I left him. Any one else > have experience with this?
In article <19971006124101.IAA24...@ladder02.news.aol.com>,
astri...@aol.com (Astrid88) writes: >I wondered if anyone here sued for divorce over mate having cybersex with >many > other people. Mine did and he even discussed our sex life with his cyber > partners. I accidently found his logs in the computer. It ruined our >25-year > marriage. I had always thought he was faithful. I left him. Any one else > have experience with this?
There are more and more cases involving cybersex, porn and cyber-infidelity. Some of them have evolved into actual physical relationships between cyber-lovers. Most are private chats. Whatever goes on, it is considered by most matrimonial folks as a breach of the marriage contract.
The interesting question is: Why didn't the spouse participating in it erase the chat records, empty the trash, download them onto a diskette that is then hidden or tossed or do something to make it extremely difficult for his or her spouse to find them?
My husband thought I was too dumb to open his logs, too. I asked him why he kept them in the computer and he said that he needed a way to keep track of what he had said to whom! He had some people thinking he was much younger, etc.... I think lots of people lie about themselves online. We had problems before it started and he blamed me for his transgressions with the computer. I think we are all responsible for ourselves and cannot blame others for this type of activity. I must admit that since I left (1 year ago) I have been very happy. I know for sure I could never live with him again. Fortunately, we have no small kids. Too bad all this happened. I believe that a measure of a man's worth is equal to what he would do if he thought he'd never be found out! Astrid Alexander
astri...@aol.com (Astrid88) wrote: >Hi >I wondered if anyone here sued for divorce over mate having cybersex with many > other people. Mine did and he even discussed our sex life with his cyber > partners. I accidently found his logs in the computer. It ruined our 25-year > marriage. I had always thought he was faithful. I left him. Any one else > have experience with this?
>Astrid Alexander
My wife (soon ex) found the chat rooms on the internet. She started talking to several people and I found several logs of the conversations. They were the usual ones where the guys were saying all the sweet things to get into her pants. And I know that she has meet some of them. When I confronted her about it, she said that they were just "friends". From the conversations, I told her no way, and the end result is a divorce. Our marriage was waning anyway, although I thought saveable, but what is very hard for me (and yes, still cry) is that one of these "men" not caring about what they do. Makes me feel like a real loser. I will recover, but it will take awhile. Yes even though I do not think she went to bed with them, I do not feel any different then if she did.
My husband assumed that I was too stupid to find the records. Little did he know, I knew just where to look, and figured out how to open the ICQ file histories without actually being online (which required a password).
He came home that night and I confronted him with 'I thought you said you weren't doing this anymore'. He skirted the issue with 'you invaded my privacy'.
I agree, I shouldn't have gotten into his computer, but really, should his sex life be an issue kept private from his wife? He told me that he wasn't doing it anymore, and I simply wanted proof.
Though it might start a really awful flame war, I would like to hear the "transgressor's" side of the story. Is there anyone out there who participates in cybersex and feels that they are totally justified, and that it doesn't in any way interfere with their marriage? I'd sure like to hear that perspective.
Jen
LJohn314 <ljohn...@aol.com> wrote in article <19971007032500.XAA19...@ladder01.news.aol.com>...
> In article <19971006124101.IAA24...@ladder02.news.aol.com>, > astri...@aol.com (Astrid88) writes:
> >I wondered if anyone here sued for divorce over mate having cybersex with > >many > > other people. Mine did and he even discussed our sex life with his cyber > > partners. I accidently found his logs in the computer. It ruined our > >25-year > > marriage. I had always thought he was faithful. I left him. Any one else > > have experience with this?
> There are more and more cases involving cybersex, porn and > cyber-infidelity. Some of them have evolved into actual physical > relationships between cyber-lovers. Most are private chats. Whatever goes > on, it is considered by most matrimonial folks as a breach of the marriage > contract.
> The interesting question is: Why didn't the spouse participating in it > erase the chat records, empty the trash, download them onto a diskette that > is then hidden or tossed or do something to make it extremely difficult for > his or her spouse to find them?
On 6 Oct 1997 12:41:21 GMT, astri...@aol.com (Astrid88) wrote:
>Hi >I wondered if anyone here sued for divorce over mate having cybersex with many > other people. Mine did and he even discussed our sex life with his cyber > partners. I accidently found his logs in the computer. It ruined our 25-year > marriage. I had always thought he was faithful. I left him. Any one else > have experience with this?
>Astrid Alexander
Everyone, especially the women, are completely missing the point.
If you paid any bit of attention and tried just the slightest to pay attention to your married partner, he/she probably would not have found any interest in pursuing cyber activities, beyond the original novelty.
Ask yourself "what is missing from our relationship that was once there?" I guarantee it is a lack of discussion and lack of being able to compromise on both parts as to what needs to be changed.
Remember those early days/years? Weren't they fun? They still could be if both sides could communicate.
In NJ, a very famous cybersex case was thrown out of court for grounds of adultry. It may not be legal grounds, but its definitely a sign something is seriously awry in the marriage relationship.
G wrote in message <343d4103.21120...@news.ral.mindspring.com>... >On 6 Oct 1997 12:41:21 GMT, astri...@aol.com (Astrid88) wrote:
>>Hi >>I wondered if anyone here sued for divorce over mate having cybersex with many >> other people. Mine did and he even discussed our sex life with his cyber >> partners. I accidently found his logs in the computer. It ruined our 25-year >> marriage. I had always thought he was faithful. I left him. Any one else >> have experience with this?
>>Astrid Alexander
>Everyone, especially the women, are completely missing the point.
>If you paid any bit of attention and tried just the slightest to pay >attention to your married partner, he/she probably would not have >found any interest in pursuing cyber activities, beyond the original >novelty.
>Ask yourself "what is missing from our relationship that was once >there?" I guarantee it is a lack of discussion and lack of being able >to compromise on both parts as to what needs to be changed.
>Remember those early days/years? Weren't they fun? They still could be >if both sides could communicate.
>my $0.02 worth.
>G
>I
I find your argument totally inane and offensive. It is a means of making the victim feel as the perp in a crime. Is a husband "justified" in having an alduterous affair because his wife "doesn't understand him?" This is so much total bullshit. No spouse committed to a relationship has the *right* to do whatever he/she feels because he/she feels the relationship is lacking somewhere. Was there communication about needs being unfulfilled? Was there ever any open discussion with the partner about what is lacking in the relationship? The internet is safer than a bar, but far more deadly. An affair on-line is still an affair of the heart and mind if not the body. It is still an affair and should be considered adultery in my book.
> In NJ, a very famous cybersex case was thrown out of court for grounds of > adultry. > It may not be legal grounds, but its definitely a sign something is seriously > awry in the marriage relationship.
Just curious--how do you access logs of chat conversations?
>>Just curious--how do you access logs of chat conversations?
on AOL, "member svcs."
good luck, Dana ************************************************************************** *****************************Oh damn, is that a lifesaver stuck to my butt?
G. wrote: >Everyone, especially the women, are completely missing the point. >If you paid any bit of attention and tried just the slightest to pay >attention to your married partner, he/she probably would not have >found any interest in pursuing cyber activities, beyond the original >novelty. >Ask yourself "what is missing from our relationship that was once >there?" I guarantee it is a lack of discussion and lack of being able >to compromise on both parts as to what needs to be changed. >Remember those early days/years? Weren't they fun? They still could be >if both sides could communicate.
While I agree with the second part of your reply, I can't say as I fully agree with the first part (or at least I don't agree that it is true for EVERY woman whose husband gets caught up in cybersex.) For some or even alot, maybe, but I think that saying it is the wife's fault when her husband gets involved in cybersex because she hasn't paid enough attention to him is pretty much leaping to conclusions. Do you also think that when a man has a 'real' affair it's because his wife hasn't paid enough attention to him?
<<>If you paid any bit of attention and tried just the slightest to pay attention to your married partner, he/she probably would not have found any interest in pursuing cyber activities, beyond the original novelty.
>Ask yourself "what is missing from our relationship that was once there?" I
guarantee it is a lack of discussion and lack of being able to compromise on both parts as to what needs to be changed.
>Remember those early days/years? Weren't they fun? They still could be if both
sides could communicate.
>my $0.02 worth.
>G
>I
I find your argument totally inane and offensive. >>
Sorry I agree with this $.02 person. For the most part, people don't cheat for the thrill of it. It is because they need some support and affection and a whole host of other things. An affair in a marriage is a sign that something is not working and it takes TWO to make the relationship work. Both partners have had an effect on the marriage and how it got to the state it is in.
<< Do you also think that when a man has a 'real' affair it's because his wife hasn't paid enough attention to him?>>
I sure do.... for SOME people this is very true. It could also be that the wife and husband are not communicating at all.... (which is both their faults).......it could be a whole host of things...
<< Do you also think that when a man has a 'real' affair it's because his <<wife hasn't paid enough attention to him?>>
<I sure do.... for SOME people this is very true. It could also be that <the wife and husband are not communicating at all.... (which is both <their faults).......it could be a whole host of things...
Spunky I agree with you. I was taking offense at the fact that the poster seemed to want to make it ALL the wives' fault that their husbands were caught up in cybersex. I seem to have this pathological urge to point out when generalizations/absolutes are stated as THE reason.
Pat, not logs on chat (although I've heard you can do this somehow), letters on hard drive. There is a famous murder going on right now in this state (15 yr old murdered an 11 yr old) and the cops conviscated the teen's computer's hard drive for his letters. On AOL its easy to find the letters--even w/o a password!
Hi Group Getting letters and logs off the AOL provider can be done if your personal file cabinet is set to save anything. It too, can be accessed through the file manager. Any provider can be set to save logs and/or letters as a default.
If you do not intentionally save logs and letters, the computer eventually deletes the temp files at various rates. This can be altered by Defragging the C:\ drive from your system tools file. This can be Win95 0r Win 3.1
DOS 6.2 can defrag by typing defrag at the C prompt. Astrid Alexander
>> In NJ, a very famous cybersex case was thrown out of court for grounds of >> adultry. >> It may not be legal grounds, but its definitely a sign something is seriously >> awry in the marriage relationship.
>Just curious--how do you access logs of chat conversations?
Sorry I agree with this $.02 person. For the most part, people don't cheat for the thrill of it. It is because they need some support and affection and a whole host of other things. An affair in a marriage is a sign that something is not working and it takes TWO to make the relationship work. Both partners have had an effect on the marriage and how it got to the state it is in.
snip
And you base this declaration on ... what?
An affair in a marriage is a sign that the person having the affair wants something not in the marriage -- but THAT doesn't mean the partner is in any way neglecting them or not "working". MY ex simply wanted MORE. More partners, more variety, more kinkiness... the only way I could have "worked" that out was to clone myself (preferably adding some Asian DNA) so there were at least two of me, have a sex change then back (he had some transgender partners), and become willing to submit to S/M D/s behavior (his latest bimbo was a 24/7 slave who did all the housework, all the yard work, drove him around, submitted to torture (including piercing her nipples) PLUS paid him $500 a month rent.) It had nothing to do with me, in fact he even commented as recently as a few months ago that he had contemplated living with me again as long as he could have this stuff on the side. (HA!) Sometimes people (and in my experience it's nearly always men) simply have non-monogamous personal agendas. You tolerate it (like I did for way way too long, deluding myself that it was a "phase") or you get out. You can't make a partner behave in any given way, and if you think "dedication and hard work" will keep a marriage happy when you are married to one of these types, you are in for a rude awakening.
If marriage is something youwant, get realistic about the person you want to marry.
I posted something in general about responsibility for "straying", but I also want to address Cybersex. (The original post has expired on my system, but I don't need it!)
Cybersex is shared fantasy. If the sharing is important with particular people, I think it's the same as real life sharing -- and if you believe in monogamy it's an infringement on spousal rights. If it's instant messages and dirty words between a person and random willing participants, then it depends on whether juvenile behavior bothers you or not. (It does me, but that's me.)
My ex, before we separated then divorced, spent literally hours (six or more, frequently) continuously involved with ongoing cybersexual realtionships with a few specific people over a long period of time. (I thought he'd "get over it" so I hung in -- I was way wrong.) This resulted in him not spending any quality time with me, even though I truly loved him and wanted to, was willing to do nearly anything to save our marriage, and even though he knew how much he was hurting me. (Obsessive-compulsive behavior is one diagnosis he had, although he argued it.)
But if the question was "is it LEGAL grounds for divorce" then I would guess it depends on your state. Most places, you might as well go for "irreconcilable differences" (I think it fits anyhow, I consider being abandoned for a glowing screen pretty irreconcilable!).
If the question was really "is this grounds for concern" then I say, absolutely! But only if you perceive it to be a problem between you -- if it's a hobby, not particularly compulsive, and not interfering in YOUR relationship, then I guess it's not, although I never met anyone who felt quite that way about it.
> Sorry I agree with this $.02 person. For the most part, people don't cheat for > the thrill of it. It is because they need some support and affection and a > whole host of other things. An affair in a marriage is a sign that something > is not working and it takes TWO to make the relationship work. Both partners > have had an effect on the marriage and how it got to the state it is in.
> snip
> And you base this declaration on ... what?
> An affair in a marriage is a sign that the person having the affair wants > something not in the marriage -- but THAT doesn't mean the partner is in any > way neglecting them or not "working". MY ex simply wanted MORE. More partners, > more variety, more kinkiness...
Dear Sherry-
I had to chime in with a "me too!" When my husband and I started arguing constantly last November, I offered to get counseling together. He thought counseling was stupid. We patched things up but he continued to share sex fantasies with his cyberspace pen pal and I continued to object and ask for us to work on the relationship. In Jan. I told him that I would understand if he needed a divorce, but that I would never forgive him for cheating (real life). I was diagnosed with clinical depression after 7 months of this cybersex arguement. I know that something was MISSING from our relationship. But it pisses me off that people think that an affair is anything but a cowardly selfish act. IF you want to sleep with someone else, have the decency to leave the marriage before indulging your adolescent fantasies! This son of a bitch lied to the therapist when we finally got into counseling. He borrowed my mother's car and drove to Vegas to screw his cyberpal in a hotel room paid for by my father as a birthday present!
Where does this fit into some people's theory that the victim partner wasn't paying attention?
M. (ooh, I guess I'm a little bitter tonite. Hmm, best get back to the therapist.)
>Where does this fit into some people's theory that the victim partner >wasn't paying attention?
You know, after having to deal with this subject myself, I have come to believe that the root cause of affairs are that something is missing from the base relationship/marriage. It could be lots of things. A certain 'variety' of sex, an emotional closeness, a feeling of being respected, a feeling of being 'wanted, a low self-esteem, whatever. What I don't agree with is that this means the spouse is automatically 'at fault' for not noticing that their spouse was needing something they weren't getting. Some people will deny there is anything wrong until the day they walk out the door. (BTDTGTTS.) And if one partner is saying 'What's wrong? Talk to me,' and the other is saying 'Nothing,' or bringing up extraneous issues that are not the REAL problem, there is little you can do about it. So, yes, I do believe the root cause of an affair is because there is something wrong in the relationship, but in no way do I believe that that the spouse who didn't cheat should automatically be assumed to have been inattentive.