--
Helen
Thanks be unto God for His wonderful gift:
Jesus Christ, the only begotten Son of God
is the object of our faith; the only faith that
saves is faith in Him
<>< ><>
www.peagramfamily.com
http://www.mompeagram.homestead.com/
225/190/145
"Julie" <the.ri...@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:9ycLb.25467$ts4.14479@pd7tw3no...
On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 13:03:01 GMT, "Julie" <the.ri...@shaw.ca>
wrote:
"Fred" <67516...@compuserve.com> wrote in message
news:bl4svv4j6mk6p63im...@4ax.com...
Okay, a number of years ago, a local shop (macy's or nordstrom's-like)
called Fredricks and Nelsons (Seattle, like Nordstroms) had a candy
called Frangos. It was packaged in an octogon shaped box. Mint
probably was the original flavor. Other flavors were developed. Kind
of a small rectangular truffle. An inner chocolate with flavor dipped
in chocolate. Some turkey managed to get control and sent them into
bankruptcy. They ceased to exist. Another local, Bon Marche, took
over the very popular Frango line, purchasing it in the bankruptcy
sale, I think. The Bon now is Bon-Macy's.
So they still produce the item but it was made for them by a local
chocolateer (spelling?). Recently, they changed manufacturers. The
local guy decided to create a similar confection. A legal bruhaha.
He managed to develop something very similar but packaging was not
permitted in the octogon box. So they just made a larger plain
plastic jar and it is distributed by Costco. Doing well from what I
understand.
Therein lies a long short story.
But it does have an axiom. Just this weekend, when I was discussing
portion control with a Frango freak (g), I discussed Skinny Cows and
the individual and therefore, portion control angle, of one item
instead of a tub of ice cream. Then I noted that the old octogon
Frango box held much fewer candies then the Costco JAR she had already
consumed. There was a tendency to hold back in the octogon so that
there would be some left over for another day/week. The larger jar,
huge, actually, does not cause that same tendency or hesitancy.
There's plenty more. Therefore, more candies per sitting and not as
self-limiting.
Aren't you glad you asked?
(GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG)
On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 03:39:15 GMT, "Julie" <the.ri...@shaw.ca>
wrote:
--
krys
UK 157/135.2/126
Started March 1st 2001
GOAL August 16th 2001
struggling now......but making progress.
"Julie" <the.ri...@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:9ycLb.25467$ts4.14479@pd7tw3no...
Actually, if you are interested, here were just some of the
temptations over the New Years weekend:
http://fk8660.home.att.net/DSCN3069.JPG
And then a Room with a View:
http://fk8660.home.att.net/DSCN3090.JPG
And then a panorama where I was skiing:
http://fk8660.home.att.net/CommunityTrail.jpg
OH, and I am sorry - but these a photos and maybe DH can explain them.
CASE is important on AT&T sites for url's.
Joyce
Joyce
The fourth style of cookie was in the fridge!!!
I think I'm regaining the NON-holiday attitude - finally.
But see the article Prairie posted on chubby men due to aging! (sigh)
I think I'm also back into the non-holiday attitude, finally. I've had more than
my share of fruits, salads and veggies this week, and they sure were good.
Chicken twice for dinner, fish, and had a lean pork tenderloin thrown in somewhere
along the line.
I'll have to look for the article PR posted, think I missed it along the line. My
mind has been shot, but I'm feeling better now.
Joyce
I don't know where they are being produced now, but it is no longer Chicago. And
I just heard today that Fanny May is also closing it's doors. Hub told me that
when the stores empty their shelves, that is it. I told him there was no way I
was going to bring anymore chocolate into this house, at this time! <g>
Joyce
The others were toffee chips. I'm missing the third ones right now
but the fourth variety were a Nanimo type thingie. Brownie bottom,
sugar, butter, cream filling and then a chocolate glaze top! The
fourth were a chocolate cookie with raisins I think. Then there was
a terrific 5th cookie she had saved in the freezer from another bake -
it was terrific even though it was not chocolate - it was a cookie but
made from a yeast raised dough - flakey, terrific. But I did ski
something like 25-30 miles with some good elevation. The non-meringue
were actually not made for me but a "girls'" potluck that I
fortunately did not attend (G)
Sounds like we need time to wind down holidays but know the program
and the skills.
"Fred" <67516...@compuserve.com> wrote in message
news:ciisvv0r5jvfa2uks...@4ax.com...
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 01:08:21 GMT, "Julie" <the.ri...@shaw.ca>
wrote:
Thanks for posting these. I get wistful about going to the mountains
whenever you post your pictures.
Prairie Roots
"Fred" <67516...@compuserve.com> wrote in message
news:h4ltvvole53matplc...@4ax.com...
As for the landscape pan shot - it is actually five separate pictures
and a separate program stitched them together automatically. You just
have to make sure that there is sufficient overlap between sidebyside
images for it to work.
I think that I HAVE TO LIVE near mountains. I also like knowing the
ocean is somewhere nearby - altho, it is much further from Seattle
than most people think.
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:06:18 -0600, Prairie Roots <m...@privacy.net>
wrote:
--
~Kristin O~
272/242.2/172
"Julie" <the.ri...@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:9ycLb.25467$ts4.14479@pd7tw3no...
"Fred" <67516...@compuserve.com> wrote in message
news:h4ltvvole53matplc...@4ax.com...
Altho, (back to that other thread on the skiing and feeling good) - I
do think that eating more while and after skiing this last period may
be explained by the fact that I have less "stores" in body fat to
expend that much energy and keep going that many hours. So maybe the
munchies are a reasonable reaction as long as I don't carry it out
over a full week. I still think banking activity points after really
heavy exertion is acceptable for me on occasion.
It really is nice - it's the Washington version of the Okanogan!
"Fred" <67516...@compuserve.com> wrote in message
news:7cc5009b6tq9bfmvh...@4ax.com...
My secretary today had the new WW calculator. It does food points and
she asked for my activities this weekend. She freaked when I told her
STRENUOUS, FOUR HOURS and my weight and came up with 16+ points or
more each day. And last week's 3 days of skiing was probably more
than that. She did think that I do need to eat but could not suggest
realistically how much. I probably do need to count points again and
journal more again.
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:12:39 -0800, "Brenda Hammond"
I do try to get as much exercise as I can while at work. If I need to do
errands and I'm not in a hurry I'll walk to wherever it is I need to go.
Now that the shop is larger I'm constantly on the go there, from one side to
the other. I need to find a pedometer and track how far I go in a day just
in the shop. I would probably be surprised at the amount of walking I do
just in that space.
Nicholas also keeps me busy. I find the days just fly by and are gone
before I know it. They need to be about 8 hours longer... No that's a bad
idea because there would be more time to eat!
Tonight instead of high fat/calorie snacks I had 0 point soup and fruit.
Off to a good start today. Totally within points! Now I'm hoping I can
stay there! Oh, did manage to get in my allotment of water today too.
>
> My secretary today had the new WW calculator. It does food points and
> she asked for my activities this weekend. She freaked when I told her
> STRENUOUS, FOUR HOURS and my weight and came up with 16+ points or
> more each day. And last week's 3 days of skiing was probably more
> than that. She did think that I do need to eat but could not suggest
> realistically how much. I probably do need to count points again and
> journal more again.
I've begun journalling today and so far I'm doing well. It's just a matter
of keeping it up. I thought once about a WW calculator, but don't think I'd
get enough use out of it. I use Dustin's point calculator alot, also use
the WW online one and MasterCook.
Keep it up, ehem, down.
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:13:33 -0800, "Brenda Hammond"
"Fred" <67516...@compuserve.com> wrote in message
news:le0800hl3hi253ht2...@4ax.com...
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:20:46 -0800, "Brenda Hammond"
"Fred" <67516...@compuserve.com> wrote in message
news:tqi900h0geu1v8bfs...@4ax.com...
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:11:08 -0800, "Brenda Hammond"
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:26:37 -0800, Fred <67516...@compuserve.com>
wrote:
Another good day for me today, three in a row now!
--
Brenda
209/178/150
RafL goal 165
"Fred" <67516...@compuserve.com> wrote in message
news:a8ua00t1ttk7t81s9...@4ax.com...
"Fred" <67516...@compuserve.com> wrote in message
news:il3c009rnh7u3uq0u...@4ax.com...
I did a good job winding down, for some goofy reason this week *feels* like it has
been out of control again. Again, nothing major but I seem to be constantly
hungry and nibbling. Not good, not good - but am moving forward and taking each
day as it comes.
Ok - have a trader joes oatmeal question for you ...
I went today, looked at the McCann's oatmeal - and there are 3 cans to choose
from. Steel Cut oats, Fine cut oats, and Irish Oats. Now which one do I buy?
LOL! I put them all back and decided to come ask you first. <g> I did let
daughter talk me into some coconut icecream though - is pre-portioned into
individual little coconut shells (think this is why she wanted it) and 150some
calories ... not too bad. For me, I chose the orange sorbet which is packed in
little orange rinds - 87 calories (I think). Boy I love this place, something new
and exciting always jumps out at me.
Joyce
Joyce
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:55:21 -0600, Joyce <jo...@123.net> wrote:
>mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. My sister used to make a similar recipe, but left the nuts out.
>It's been many years since she has made them ... for me anyway. <g> And I love
>anything with toffee, and of course .. chocolate! Probably a good thing I wasn't
>near you during the holidays - had a hard enough time with the temptations just in
>my home, without adding the goodies at yours. <g>
Luckily it was not my house and she supports my program but does make
cookies. When she offered, she limited my selections and numbers
since most were going to a potluck.
>I did a good job winding down, for some goofy reason this week *feels* like it has
>been out of control again. Again, nothing major but I seem to be constantly
>hungry and nibbling. Not good, not good - but am moving forward and taking each
>day as it comes.
I got back to Journaling yesterday. Will see if I can continue it.
>Ok - have a trader joes oatmeal question for you ...
>
>I went today, looked at the McCann's oatmeal - and there are 3 cans to choose
>from. Steel Cut oats, Fine cut oats, and Irish Oats. Now which one do I buy?
>LOL! I put them all back and decided to come ask you first. <g> I did let
>daughter talk me into some coconut icecream though - is pre-portioned into
>individual little coconut shells (think this is why she wanted it) and 150some
>calories ... not too bad. For me, I chose the orange sorbet which is packed in
>little orange rinds - 87 calories (I think). Boy I love this place, something new
>and exciting always jumps out at me.
Oh, great, now you've added to my confusion but Maybe I'm lucky by
choice limitations - STEEL CUT are the ones I've got downstairs
(thanks for the exercise incentive (G)) I wonder what the Irish Oats
are?
>
>
>On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:55:21 -0600, Joyce <jo...@123.net> wrote:
>
>>mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. My sister used to make a similar recipe, but left the nuts out.
>>It's been many years since she has made them ... for me anyway. <g> And I love
>>anything with toffee, and of course .. chocolate! Probably a good thing I wasn't
>>near you during the holidays - had a hard enough time with the temptations just in
>>my home, without adding the goodies at yours. <g>
>
>Luckily it was not my house and she supports my program but does make
>cookies. When she offered, she limited my selections and numbers
>since most were going to a potluck.
You were fortunate then, at least you were limited in the quantities and didn't
have the treats constantly beckoning you. <G>
>>I did a good job winding down, for some goofy reason this week *feels* like it has
>>been out of control again. Again, nothing major but I seem to be constantly
>>hungry and nibbling. Not good, not good - but am moving forward and taking each
>>day as it comes.
>
>I got back to Journaling yesterday. Will see if I can continue it.
>
>>Ok - have a trader joes oatmeal question for you ...
>>
>>I went today, looked at the McCann's oatmeal - and there are 3 cans to choose
>>from. Steel Cut oats, Fine cut oats, and Irish Oats. Now which one do I buy?
>>LOL! I put them all back and decided to come ask you first. <g> I did let
>>daughter talk me into some coconut icecream though - is pre-portioned into
>>individual little coconut shells (think this is why she wanted it) and 150some
>>calories ... not too bad. For me, I chose the orange sorbet which is packed in
>>little orange rinds - 87 calories (I think). Boy I love this place, something new
>>and exciting always jumps out at me.
>
>Oh, great, now you've added to my confusion but Maybe I'm lucky by
>choice limitations - STEEL CUT are the ones I've got downstairs
>(thanks for the exercise incentive (G)) I wonder what the Irish Oats
>are?
Ok, Steel Cut it is - I hate to have you go to all that exertion for nothing.
I'll give them a try next week, think I'm stocked to the gills right now with
Trader Joe stuff. <G> I'll take a look and see what the Irish Oats are - if the
can even states a difference. All the cans do look identical though, so have to
be pretty careful when making that selection.
And just to get you going ... if you ever decide you want a switch from the
pre-portioned skinny cow treats ... my daughter just had to have some coconut
icecream from them (scooped into little coconut shells, pretty cute). I tried the
Orange Givrees this evening (orange sorbet), worked out to 1.78 points (if I
remember correctly) and were darned good! Again, a pre-measured item so making
those scooping mistakes is taken care of for us. <G> I did have a taste of
daughters coconut, was also very good but a bit higher in points - 3.70.
Joyce
>
Joyce
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 02:39:30 -0600, "Miss Violette" <Rgr...@consolidated.net>
wrote:
>the two stores in Springfield are now devoid of chocolates, Lee
I haven't tried any of them, but I've been thinking about it lately.
Oatmeal makes me queasy, but maybe it's the texture of the rolled
oats.
Stan
http://www.mccanns.ie/pages/products.html
They also have FAQ and prep ideas including the one I did on my own -
making a larger batch and reheating daily, as needed. Also the
overnight method and a microwave method (I had tried on my own and ran
into the bubbling trouble they mention!)
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 02:36:21 -0600, Joyce <jo...@123.net> wrote:
>On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 18:37:18 -0800, Fred <67516...@compuserve.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:55:21 -0600, Joyce <jo...@123.net> wrote:
>>
>>>mmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. My sister used to make a similar recipe, but left the nuts out.
>>>It's been many years since she has made them ... for me anyway. <g> And I love
>>>anything with toffee, and of course .. chocolate! Probably a good thing I wasn't
>>>near you during the holidays - had a hard enough time with the temptations just in
>>>my home, without adding the goodies at yours. <g>
>>
>>Luckily it was not my house and she supports my program but does make
>>cookies. When she offered, she limited my selections and numbers
>>since most were going to a potluck.
>
>You were fortunate then, at least you were limited in the quantities and didn't
>have the treats constantly beckoning you. <G>
Well, I had my dried fruit and was trying to eat that. But, again,
too much of a good thing???
Okay. I will think about it. I also think that I need a
free-standing freezer. Mine is stuffed tight and just now trying to
get the bread in there I dumped the OLD english muffins which I don't
use anyway.
Joyce
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:46:01 -0600, Stan <sta...@onramp.nounderscore.net> wrote:
Joyce