Message from discussion
Dietary supplements increase cancer risk
Received: by 10.204.152.217 with SMTP id h25mr606965bkw.3.1337199947893;
Wed, 16 May 2012 13:25:47 -0700 (PDT)
Path: e27ni633bkw.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin3!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!posting.tweaknews.nl!not-for-mail
From: "GysdeJongh" <JonghSevenHundredElevenAtPlanet.nl>
Newsgroups: alt.support.diabetes
References: <4fb2cc1e$0$18986$8a7afdce@news4.usenet4u.nl> <kgad89-ad5.ln1@jester.gnet> <jp0vth$71n$1@news.datemas.de>
Subject: Re: Dietary supplements increase cancer risk
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 22:25:47 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <4fb40d4b$0$11632$8a7afdce@news4.usenet4u.nl>
Organization: Usenet4u
X-Trace: DXC=cJi_KW6ndNm>5H:=U8<Y=me_ml?PTjZ9mWcIIPVClIJ`4S:75DkWK1e]VJ25^IJ<VnndGXfh9b2ZdZB>01Hg`J6`J:M7VHP507alEfVOG3`aYg
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="Windows-1252";
reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
deT notsuH wrote:
> Maybe wickedpedia isn't the best reference to go by....
>
> Not sure if this link will work for you, but it is the actual article
> referenced in the link posted by Gysde:
> http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/104/10/732.full
> Since you are most focused on folic acid, here's the relevant section
> (RCT = randomized controlled trial, widely regarded as the gold
> standard): <quote>
> Folic Acid
Thank you for the extensive quote from this article deT notsuH :) It's not
free to read for everyone so I welcome this contribution.
I posted a bit cynical comment on top of my post to help the usual suspects
with their usual comment. Did not help of course
Thx again
Gys