news:agpuc9...@mid.individual.net...
> On 11/17/2012 4:49 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>
>> My husband has only a cell phone. He is on Staten Island. When that
>> hurricane hit, the cell towers were down for about a week. So he had no
>> phone at all. I am not willing to take that risk.
>
> Yea, well, the copper wired phone companies are going to be abandoning
> those expensive networks sooner than later. Folks like me, living in low
> density population regions, aren't going to have much choice in the
> matter. So your willingness may soon have little real effect.
I doubt that. Cell phones won't work for a lot of businesses. Especially
those that use more than one like.
>
>
http://tinyurl.com/atodjth
>
>> Plus... I hate talking
>> on the cell phone. The connection is not necessarily good and the phone
>> is
>> just too small.
>
> Your hardwired house phone could very soon be talking to the world
> using cellular towers. Besides, you're the one usually complaining
> about not having space to store things because they're just too big!
I don't store phones. I have two phone tables. One is on the counter in
the kitchen. One is on my nightstand. And the one in the back house is
merely on a board on the wall.
>
>> Plus the jury is still out as to whether or not they cause
>> brain damage.
>
> I know that some folks are really worried about that, but in most
> cases it is funny to contemplate. OTOH since it is your husband's
> *only* telephone, one wonders why you would allow your primary
> source of income to be placed in such jeopardy if, indeed, that's
> a real concern to you.
I can not control what he does. And he is on Staten Island where it can
take months to get a landline. I know. We lived there before. We had only
the cell phone for quite a while. and he is there temporarily. So...
Paying all that money to hook up a landline would be kind of silly. He
could come back here potentially as soon as Jan.
>
>> I don't know if I have an alarm or not.
>
> Well you paid for it if it is there.
So? I don't care if it's there or not. Not gonna use it. Just because
something works for someone else doesn't mean it will work for me. I could
just as easily or in my case not easily set an alarm clock. That wouldn't
work for me either!
>
>> I don't use that or any camera.
>
> So it has a camera but they're evil?
No. I just am not into pictures. We have some. I never look at them.
Except for once in a while, Anglea's dance pics which I keep in my purse. I
mainly refer to them to show someone a costume that she had on. Usually a
new person to the dance studio who is wondering about the quality of the
costumes. And they are very high quality. They have their own seamstress
and she is very good.
>
>> I don't pay extra for long distance on my landline either.
>
> Unless you either ask your phone company or carefully read a detailed
> phone bill you have no idea whether that's true or not. As a minimum
> there are, in many places, separate taxes for intrastate long distance
> access and interstate long distance access. Based on the level of
> attention you pay to most items in ordinary life, I doubt that you
> actually have any idea about the individual elements of your
> communications costs.
I know that it's true. I see the bill. Just saw it the other day. I do
pay a lot of taxes on the phone stuff. And surcharges and stuff. But I pay
a flat rate and there is no extra charge for long distance.
>
> >>> "I hate cell phones."
>
>>> Hate is such a useless function that always costs those who do without
>>> any benefit to balance it out.
>>
>> Whatever.
>
> That's the obvious answer from you when you don't have a real answer.
So you say.