Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Sugar, not fat as the culprit

1 view
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

Quentin Grady

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 11:09:06 PM11/7/09
to

Historically interesting Susan.

On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:49:00 -0500, Susan <su...@nothanks.org> wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>
>Interesting, check out the date that this appeared in the prestigious
>journal, Nature. Interesting to note that this predates the
>understanding that starches are as glycemic and sometimes more glycemic
>than sugar, but meter testing wasn't widely available then:
>
>http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v209/n5018/abs/209081a0.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Nature 209, 81 - 82 (01 January 1966); doi:10.1038/209081a0
>
>
>Metabolic Differences between Starch and Sucrose
>SOHAIR AL-NAGDY, D. S. MILLER, R. U. QURESHI & JOHN YUDKIN
>Department of Nutrition, Queen Elizabeth College, London, W.8.
>SINCE 1957, papers from this department have stressed that the dietary
>factor involved in the aetiology of ischaemic heart disease is likely to
>be sugar (sucrose) rather than fat1. The evidence incriminating dietary
>sugar�now quite strong�is chiefly epidemiological. Investigations of
>populations show that the rise in the incidence of the disease coincides
>with the rise in the consumption of sugar and not of fat2�4. Again,
>during investigations of individuals we have shown that the disease is
>most likely to occur in those that have been eating a great deal of sugar5.
>
>
>
>
>1. Yudkin, J. , Lancet, ii, 155 (1957). For summary, see Yudkin, J. ,
>Lancet, i, 1335 (1963).
>2. Cohen, A. M. , Bavly, S. , and Poznanski, R. , Lancet, ii, 1399 (1961).
>3. Antar, M. A. , Ohlson, M. A. , and Hodges, R. E. , Amer. J. Chin.
>Nutr., 14, 169 (1964). | ChemPort |
>4. Yudkin, J. , Lancet, ii, 4 (1964); Proc. Nutr. Soc., 23, 149 (1964).
>5. Yudkin, J. , and Roddy, J. , Lancet, ii, 6 (1964).
>6. Kinsell, L. D. , Food Processing, 26, 67 (1965).
>7. Macdonald, I. , Proc. Nutr. Soc., 23, 119 (1964). | Article | PubMed
>| ISI | ChemPort |
>8. Antar, M. A. , and Ohlson, M. A. , J. Nutrition, 85, 329 (1965). |
>ISI | ChemPort |
>9. Cohen, A. M. , and Teitelbaum, A. , Amer. J. Physiol., 206, 105
>(1964). | PubMed | ISI | ChemPort |
>10. Thomasson, H. J. , Gottenbos, J. J. , Kloeze, J. , and Vles, R. O.
>, Proc. Nutr. Soc. (in the press).
--
Quentin Grady ^ ^ /
New Zealand, >#,#< [
/ \ /\
"... and the blind dog was leading."

http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin

Wes Groleau

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 11:16:15 PM11/7/09
to
Susan quoted:

> SINCE 1957, papers from this department have stressed that the dietary
> factor involved in the aetiology of ischaemic heart disease is likely to
> be sugar (sucrose) rather than fat. The evidence incriminating dietary
> sugar—now quite strong—is chiefly epidemiological. Investigations of
> populations show that the rise in the incidence of the disease coincides
> with the rise in the consumption of sugar and not of fat

Ancel Keys published the infamous "Seven Countries" study in 1943.
The same year, a less well-known article in one of the major journals
also showed that fat consumption did correlate with CHD--but that
carbohydrate consumption had a slightly higher correlation.

--
Wes Groleau

Pat's Polemics
http://Ideas.Lang-Learn.us/barrett

Message has been deleted

Wes Groleau

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 4:17:10 PM11/8/09
to
Susan wrote:

> Wes Groleau wrote:
>> Ancel Keys published the infamous "Seven Countries" study in 1943.
>> The same year, a less well-known article in one of the major journals
>> also showed that fat consumption did correlate with CHD--but that
>> carbohydrate consumption had a slightly higher correlation.
>
> Did the subjects of the studies eat only fat, or only carbs to test the
> strength of the associations?

You should have no trouble finding a copy of the infamous seven
countries study. The other one, I have only a photocopy I took
from JAMA at the library. Might have been 1944 but I think it
was 1941.

For a thorough debunking of the seven countries study, read
chapter one of "The Cholesterol Myth" by Uffe Ravnskov.
Some of the Ravnskov's criticisms of Keys would seem to me
also applicable to the other study.

--
Wes Groleau

"To know what you prefer, instead of humbly saying
Amen to what the world tells you you should prefer,
is to have kept your soul alive."
-- Robert Louis Stevenson

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Wes Groleau

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 8:57:58 PM11/8/09
to
Wes Groleau wrote:
> You should have no trouble finding a copy of the infamous seven
> countries study. The other one, I have only a photocopy I took
> from JAMA at the library. Might have been 1944 but I think it
> was 1941.

oops, _1943_

--
Wes Groleau

"A miracle is a violation of the laws of nature, and as a
firm and unalterable experience has established these laws,
the proof against a miracle, from the very nature of the fact,
is as entire as could possibly be imagined."
-- David Hume, age 37
"There's no such thing of that, 'cause I never heard of it."
-- Becky Groleau, age 4

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 3:48:40 AM11/9/09
to
Chris Hogg wrote:

> Wes Groleau wrote:
> >Susan wrote:
> >> Wes Groleau wrote:
> >>
> >>> Ancel Keys published the infamous "Seven Countries" study in 1943.
> >>> The same year, a less well-known article in one of the major journals
> >>> also showed that fat consumption did correlate with CHD--but that
> >>> carbohydrate consumption had a slightly higher correlation.
> >>
> >> Did the subjects of the studies eat only fat, or only carbs to test the
> >> strength of the associations?
> >
> >You should have no trouble finding a copy of the infamous seven
> >countries study. The other one, I have only a photocopy I took
> >from JAMA at the library. Might have been 1944 but I think it
> >was 1941.
> >
> >For a thorough debunking of the seven countries study, read
> >chapter one of "The Cholesterol Myth" by Uffe Ravnskov.
>
> Kendrick (The Great Cholesterol Con, pub. John Blake, 2008) debunks it
> even more completely than Ravnskov! He produces his own 'Fourteen
> Countries' study, in which he shows that "every single one of the
> seven countries with the lowest saturated fat consumption has
> significantly higher rates of heart disease than every single one of
> the seven countries with the highest saturated fat consumption"

The countries with no heart disease are the countries with no
overeating.

Therefore, it remains much smarter to eat the right amount (32 oz) of
food daily:

http://WDJW.net/BeSmart

Love in the truth,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-certified Heart Doctor
and Author of "Trust the Truth:"
http://www.amazon.com/-/e/B002G22ZWG

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/9642aafa0aad16eb?

Only the truth can cure the "hunger is starvation" delusion:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/74281ab7d7ce78de?

0 new messages