I strongly support diabietes research

[Nicholas Bahm]

It's neccesary as diabieties is a killer of people. I'm an honorably
discharged sailor and would love to do my part.
nicholas bahm

[Julie Bove]

"Nicholas Bahm" <nick...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cf881f1c-4258-4c8e...@e15g2000vbt.googlegroups.com...

> It's neccesary as diabieties is a killer of people. I'm an honorably
> discharged sailor and would love to do my part.
> nicholas bahm

Ookay...

[GysdeJongh]

Hi Nicholas Bahm nice to meet you. Good attitude Imo
Gys

[MaryL]

"Julie Bove" wrote in message news:jn5bf6$asp$1...@dont-email.me...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Julie, what is the point of a response like this? You post many messages
where you simply discuss your own opinion (just as the OP did here).

MaryL

[Gary Woods]

"MaryL" <stan...@invalid.yahoo.com> wrote:

>Julie, what is the point of a response like this?

I think she was concerned with a rather odd first post, perhaps colored by
the new person's responses to known and obvious loons.
Personally, I'm willing to take it at face value, but with considerable
caution.


--
Gary Woods AKA K2AHC- PGP key on request, or at home.earthlink.net/~garygarlic
Zone 5/4 in upstate New York, 1420' elevation. NY WO G

[Budd Cochran]

"MaryL" <stan...@invalid.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4f96f622$0$20437$bbae...@news.suddenlink.net...

And aren't you implying that you think (a personal opinion, btw) Julie's
opinion are ... what? ... worthless?

This is a discussion group which means opinions, some personal, some general
knowledge and some off-topic, will be posted along with facts, fantasies and
some people's attitudes that you should knuckle under to their tyrannically
presented diet plans.


--
Budd

Every vote counts ... unless you don't vote.

[Julie Bove]

"MaryL" <stan...@invalid.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4f96f622$0$20437$bbae...@news.suddenlink.net...
>
>

I don't get the point of his post. He is a newbie here. Why would he post
such a thing?

[MaryL]

"Budd Cochran" wrote in message news:YdGlr.7785$em4....@newsfe21.iad...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Not at all. I thought her response was rude because she frequently posts
pointed messages and seemed to object when someone else did the same thing.
She was not posting an opinion on a topic; she seemed to be objecting to the
OP. However, she has posted a follow-up explaining her intentions.

MaryL

[Julie Bove]

"MaryL" <stan...@invalid.yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:4f974331$0$26710$bbae...@news.suddenlink.net...

It was meant to be rude. He came here and was conversing with that Dr. who
shall not be named. And now he is in my KF. I can't see why he was here at
all except to be trolling.

[MaryL]

"Julie Bove" wrote in message news:jn7h2m$h02$1...@dont-email.me...

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I can't really address his other messages because I ignore *all* messages
that involve Dr. C. However, the one I saw was the first I had read from
this newcomer, and it was not a response to the Dr. I do try to avoid
feeding the trolls, but this message did not have the earmarks of a troll
(at least, in my interpretation). If the OP is really a newcomer--as it
seemed--then he might not be aware of Dr. C's trollish behavior. If he
continues to respond to the Dr., then I would agree with you.

MaryL

[Budd Cochran]

"MaryL" <stan...@invalid.yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:4f9748d2$0$27079$bbae...@news.suddenlink.net...

I read it as Julie saying, "O-o-o-okay . . ." as you or I would say when
expecting 'the other shoe to drop.' as it were.

IOW, what he posted didn't make sense to me either., so . . . .

[Julie Bove]

"Budd Cochran" <mr_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:D3Llr.13671$VF7....@newsfe02.iad...

Didn't make sense to me either and seemed like a strange thing to be posting
if the subject hadn't been brought up. Which it hadn't.

[Chris Malcolm]

A newbie's first posts may be influenced by all sorts of
misconceptions. It seems to me pointless to speculate, let alone draw
conclusions, until more is known.

--
Chris Malcolm

[Budd Cochran]

"Julie Bove" <juli...@frontier.com> wrote in message
news:jn86v7$btp$1...@dont-email.me...

I think everyone in the group supports diabetes research, tho some of the
studies / clinical tests / ad naseum fail to demonstrate any common sense,
consistency or verifiable results.

Kinda like the report that was accidentally released in the 70's about Coke
( the beverage) causing cancer in lab animals when injected ( not consumed
and digested) in concentrated doses equivalent to a railroad tank car full /
day.

Yeah, right. At my worst I'd never have come close to that level of
consumption and I was a certified Pepsi-holic.

[Budd Cochran]

"Chris Malcolm" <c...@holyrood.ed.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:9vpup0...@mid.individual.net...

She didn't draw any conclusions, unlike you, Malcom, she just didn't
understand the post ands wanted to see if there was more to it coming.

You, otoh, jumped to the conclusion that Julie had jumped to a conclusion
... Me, I just read it, scratched my head and . . . . then commented on the
conclusions made about Julie's supposed conclusion.

And with that I conclude this reply.

[Julie Bove]

"Budd Cochran" <mr_...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:%K3mr.22067$Ec....@newsfe16.iad...

Note that the OP has said nothing.

[Budd Cochran]

"Julie Bove" <juli...@frontier.com> wrote in message

news:jnahce$4ik$1...@dont-email.me...

Hmmm ... " 'curioser and curioser.' said Alice." (Lewis Carroll "Through the
Looking Glass"

[Bob]

Because y'all have already said it all.
The OP probably figured he'd accidentally posted to alt.nuts.assorted,
and moved on to greener pastures where the desire of an honorably
discharged sailor to do his part to support diabetes research may be the
introduction to a serious discussion.

Bob

[Julie Bove]

"Bob" <anothas...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:jnfibv$ggk$1...@dont-email.me...

> Because y'all have already said it all.
> The OP probably figured he'd accidentally posted to alt.nuts.assorted, and
> moved on to greener pastures where the desire of an honorably discharged
> sailor to do his part to support diabetes research may be the introduction
> to a serious discussion.
>

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.

And what sort of discussion do you think we should have had about it?

IMO, we can throw all the money in the world at it but it isn't going to
help us.

[Maya Zuiderweg]

Julie Bove drukte met precisie uit :

Maybe he wanted to sail around the world for raising funds for diabetes
research? Anywayzzz, we'll never know..
M.

[W. Baker]

Maya Zuiderweg <$no_spam#ma_dot_zuiderweg_@_me_dot_com#maps_on$> wrote:
: Julie Bove drukte met precisie uit :

Even if it doesn't help us, it may well help our or other people's
chilren. What if your attitude was the prevailig one before Banting
discovered what insulin does and how to use if for type 1's? Wouldn't tht
have been great(not)?

Somehow this makes me thnk of the fellow who in the late 19th centruy
wanted to close the Patent Office because he decided tht everyting we need
had alredy been invented.

Wendy

[Maya Zuiderweg]

W. Baker beweerde :

Wendy, you are right, but its not *my* opinion, but Julie's ;-)
Maya

[W. Baker]

Maya Zuiderweg <$no_spam#ma_dot_zuiderweg_@_me_dot_com#maps_on$> wrote:
: W. Baker beweerde :
: >>>
: >>> IMO, we can throw all the money in the world at it but it isn't going to

: >>> help us.
: >
: >> Maybe he wanted to sail around the world for raising funds for diabetes
: >> research? Anywayzzz, we'll never know..
: >> M.
: >
: > Even if it doesn't help us, it may well help our or other people's
: > chilren. What if your attitude was the prevailig one before Banting
: > discovered what insulin does and how to use if for type 1's? Wouldn't tht
: > have been great(not)?
: >
: > Somehow this makes me thnk of the fellow who in the late 19th centruy
: > wanted to close the Patent Office because he decided tht everyting we need
: > had alredy been invented.
: >
: > Wendy

: Wendy, you are right, but its not *my* opinion, but Julie's ;-)
: Maya

I know that and I'm sorry I was just a bit lazy and didn't go backwards to
the previous message to make the reply.

Wendy

[anothas...@aol.com]

Yes. Imagine...
Ye olde Eidgenössisches Institut für Geistiges Eigentum in Bern shutting
down in the late 19th century - before young Albert had a chance to work
there between 1902 and 1909.
Would young Albert still have had his annus mirabilis?
Or would we have been condemned to live in a universe without ye olde
photoelectric effect, without Brownian motion, without relativity,
without the equivalence of matter and energy?
A fate too awful to contemplate...

Grüezi