Received: by 10.68.238.65 with SMTP id vi1mr2884971pbc.7.1339253822481;
        Sat, 09 Jun 2012 07:57:02 -0700 (PDT)
Path: l9ni33997pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!o3g2000pby.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: M Purcell <sacsca...@aol.com>
Newsgroups: alt.philosophy,alt.support.depression
Subject: Re: Yes and No
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 07:49:42 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <4d43663f-e922-440d-af9d-f003aa2ceb60@o3g2000pby.googlegroups.com>
References: <da84a0a3-4cc2-4951-bf3e-f8b0a66c551a@d6g2000pbt.googlegroups.com>
 <d47865f7-4cc5-424c-ad7d-a3c0f5bdb5b2@f8g2000pbf.googlegroups.com>
 <FIKdnSxNE42qOE_SnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@giganews.com> <4tudnZOeIItAq07SnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@supernews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.2.41.221
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1339253822 28657 127.0.0.1 (9 Jun 2012 14:57:02 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 14:57:02 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: o3g2000pby.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.2.41.221; posting-account=2QqkNgkAAABTvVb9jC5WWXPb4CXoYpHE
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.0;
 Trident/5.0; GTB7.3),gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Jun 9, 4:43=A0am, "David" <da...@ddmail.us> wrote:
> "%" =A0wrote in messagenews:FIKdnSxNE42qOE_SnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@giganews.com=
...
> M Purcell wrote:
> > On Jun 7, 6:36 pm, Ilya Shambat <ibsham...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> There are many people who believe that one should answer all
> >> questions with yes and no; but there are questions that do not have
> >> a yes or no answer.
>
> >> A question such as "have you stopped bombing airports" does not have
> >> a yes or no answer.
>
> > That's called a leading question, it's a logical fallacy.
>
> >> You say yes, you are saying that you've done it before and have
> >> stopped doing it. You say no, you are saying that you've done it
> >> before and are still doing it. So unless you've actually bombed
> >> airports, neither a yes answer nor a no answer would be right.
>
> sure it has an answer
>
> Here?

In alt.philosophy? It does seem farfetched but an answer would be: I
never bombed airports.