Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: And just in case anyone missed it

9 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

%

unread,
Oct 30, 2012, 10:24:53 PM10/30/12
to


Janithor wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
>
> I did vote for George W. Bush twice.


i sleep when i sleep
Message has been deleted

%

unread,
Oct 30, 2012, 10:38:02 PM10/30/12
to


Janithor wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
> So I've heard.


i wonder which one of us has said their thing the most ,
you voted for george or i sleep when i sleep
Message has been deleted

%

unread,
Oct 30, 2012, 10:57:29 PM10/30/12
to


Janithor wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> On 10/30/2012 7:38 PM, % wrote:
>>
>>
>> Janithor wrote:
>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>
>>> On 10/30/2012 7:24 PM, % wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Janithor wrote:
>>>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I did vote for George W. Bush twice.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> i sleep when i sleep
>>>
>>>
>>> So I've heard.
>>
>>
>> i wonder which one of us has said their thing the most ,
>> you voted for george or i sleep when i sleep
>
>
> Jordy telling us Obama is the lesser of 2 evils.

917 google results for jordy saying the word evils
Message has been deleted

Jordy Chase

unread,
Oct 30, 2012, 11:36:45 PM10/30/12
to
Would you let % know that I miss talking with him?
Message has been deleted

Jordy Chase

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 12:05:50 AM10/31/12
to
Many people expouse that argument- that if you vote for the lesser of the evils, you're still voting for evil... (and I don't mean "evil" liteerally, I mean it figuratively.) But I contend that the bottom line is what matters in this situation... the bottom line is that either Obama or Romney will be president. If one doesn't want Romney to be president, and it's virtually certain to be a very close election, and not voting is not a viable option, and voting for a third party candidate can only help Romney, then yes, it is important to vote for the lesser "evil", Imo...
Message has been deleted

Jordy Chase

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 12:20:18 AM10/31/12
to
Yeah, I understand, but I've known him on ASD for 16 years(and we've talked for about 10 years), so he is missed...
Message has been deleted

cal

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 6:46:47 AM10/31/12
to
On 10/31/12 12:20 AM, Jordy Chase wrote:
> Yeah, I understand, but I've known him on ASD for 16 years(and we've talked for about 10 years), so he is missed...

no, he isn't missed. what you mean is, "i miss him." so if you
understand why and it's worth something to you, quit being such a putz
and make an effort to change.


cal

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 6:46:58 AM10/31/12
to
On 10/31/12 12:31 AM, Janithor wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> On 10/30/2012 9:20 PM, Jordy Chase wrote:
>> Yeah, I understand, but I've known him on ASD for 16 years(and
>> we've talked for about 10 years), so he is missed...
>
>
> I miss cal. He doesn't post here anymore.

climb up on my knee, sonny boy.

cal

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 6:47:27 AM10/31/12
to
On 10/31/12 12:05 AM, Jordy Chase wrote:
> Many people expouse that argument

nobody expouses that argument because "expouse" isn't a word in any
variant of the english language.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

mixed nuts

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 8:42:26 AM10/31/12
to
Nevertheless, English speaking people use it, so it's a word. It may
well end up in the dictionary, not unlike words like "refudiate" so, it
can become a real word what is used by educated people in nuanced repart�.

--
Grizzly H.
Message has been deleted

mixed nuts

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 9:06:05 AM10/31/12
to
On 10/31/2012 8:51 AM, Janithor wrote:
> Plus, Jordy needs to fuck off.
>

Yer just jealous because he's a rich limousine liberal and thinks deep
thoughts and didn't vote for Bush twice so he can't have a decades long
case of buyer's remorse.

--
Grizzly H.

%

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 9:59:41 AM10/31/12
to


Janithor wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> On 10/30/2012 7:57 PM, % wrote:
>>
>>
>> Janithor wrote:
>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>
>>> On 10/30/2012 7:38 PM, % wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Janithor wrote:
>>>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/30/2012 7:24 PM, % wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Janithor wrote:
>>>>>>> x-no-archive: yes
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I did vote for George W. Bush twice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i sleep when i sleep
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So I've heard.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> i wonder which one of us has said their thing the most ,
>>>> you voted for george or i sleep when i sleep
>>>
>>>
>>> Jordy telling us Obama is the lesser of 2 evils.
>>
>> 917 google results for jordy saying the word evils
>
>
> How many google results for you saying google results?

38 results for percent saying google results

3,370 results for janithor saying bush

Jordy Chase

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 10:33:11 AM10/31/12
to
On the internet, you can be who you want to be, you can pretend...

Message has been deleted

Jordy Chase

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 10:52:56 AM10/31/12
to
when it's a a matter of writing properly, if cal can write like this, not using capital letters, which isn't exactly considered superlative grammer, then i can write the way i do, and he is in position to judge or critisize...

Jordy Chase

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 1:06:21 PM10/31/12
to
sorry, I meant to say that cal is in *no* position to critisize grammar when he posts like this...

Jordy Chase

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 1:08:32 PM10/31/12
to
oops- i used a capital 'i', please forgive me...

Jordy Chase

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 5:52:20 PM10/31/12
to
It can be a good thing to be a socalled "limousine liberal" in some respects, to use a somewhat quaint, archaic term- a VERY good thing...

Rhiannon

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 6:08:26 PM10/31/12
to
On 2012-10-31 21:52:20 +0000, Jordy Chase said:

> It can be a good thing to be a socalled "limousine liberal" in some
> respects, to use a somewhat quaint, archaic term- a VERY good thing...

Laugh!

--
Rhi

cal

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 7:45:35 PM10/31/12
to
On 10/31/12 10:33 AM, Jordy Chase wrote:
> On the internet, you can be who you want to be, you can pretend...

so why don't you pretend to be someone else? wouldn't that be fun?

cal

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 7:51:16 PM10/31/12
to
like when they want to convey the nuance that they're half-wits who
flunked out of grade school?

cal

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 7:52:00 PM10/31/12
to
On 10/31/12 10:52 AM, Jordy Chase wrote:
> when it's a a matter of writing properly, if cal can write like this, not using capital letters, which isn't exactly considered superlative grammer, then i can write the way i do, and he is in position to judge or critisize...
>


Grammar, not grammer.
Criticize, not critisize.

cal

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 7:53:26 PM10/31/12
to
On 10/31/12 1:06 PM, Jordy Chase wrote:
> sorry, I meant to say that cal is in *no* position to critisize grammar when he posts like this...
>

Like you also meant to say criticize, not critisize.

Seriously now. How many years of formal education have you had? If you
never made it out of grade school, I'll start cutting you some slack on
the spelling and grammar.

%

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 8:18:16 PM10/31/12
to

"cal" <cal...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:k6sd6v$hik$5...@dont-email.me...
> On 10/31/12 10:33 AM, Jordy Chase wrote:
>> On the internet, you can be who you want to be, you can pretend...
>
> so why don't you pretend to be someone else? wouldn't that be fun?


cement + head = cement head
>

%

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 8:18:26 PM10/31/12
to

"cal" <cal...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:k6sdhk$hik$1...@dont-email.me...
> On 10/31/12 8:42 AM, mixed nuts wrote:
>> On 10/31/2012 6:47 AM, cal wrote:
>>> On 10/31/12 12:05 AM, Jordy Chase wrote:
>>>> Many people expouse that argument
>>>
>>> nobody expouses that argument because "expouse" isn't a word in any
>>> variant of the english language.
>>
>> Nevertheless, English speaking people use it, so it's a word. It may
>> well end up in the dictionary, not unlike words like "refudiate" so, it
>> can become a real word what is used by educated people in nuanced
>> reparté.
>
> like when they want to convey the nuance that they're half-wits who
> flunked out of grade school?


%

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 8:18:37 PM10/31/12
to

"cal" <cal...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:k6sdj0$hik$1...@dont-email.me...

%

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 8:18:51 PM10/31/12
to

"cal" <cal...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:k6sdlm$hik$1...@dont-email.me...

cal

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 8:21:21 PM10/31/12
to
On 10/31/12 5:52 PM, Jordy Chase wrote:
> It can be a good thing to be a socalled "limousine liberal" in some respects, to use a somewhat quaint, archaic term- a VERY good thing...
>

it can't even be called a tiny bit of a good thing in any respect at
all. it's a term of contempt, and has never been anything but that in
past or present usage.

and you're not a so-called limousine liberal. you ARE a limousine
liberal, a fraudulent creep whose only saving grace is that you're too
stupid to get it.

Rhiannon

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 8:23:09 PM10/31/12
to

4/11/09

COMM1107

Poor Quality

Easiness

2

Helpfulness

1

Clarity

1

Rater Interest

2

Unfair marking. he gives mark ONLY based on grammar. His class should be renamed to ENGLISH GRAMMAR, not Communication for Business. Very boring by reading on textbook. Nobody understands his jokes but he enjoyed so much.


--

Rhi

Jordy Chase

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 8:24:31 PM10/31/12
to
I think George W Cal may have a bit of that wise "comfort the afflicted, afflict the comfortable" attitude... Ironically, I do as well...with me, it's directed from somewhat of a "limosuine liberal" pov towards conservatives... with him, it's more from a liberal pov towards some conservatives as well as "limousine liberals"...

cal

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 8:26:13 PM10/31/12
to
hey, it's fake rhiannon! now it's a party!

%

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 8:55:40 PM10/31/12
to

"cal" <cal...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:k6sfj5$36t$2...@dont-email.me...
it has to be a fake the real one won't talk to you

cal

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 9:25:39 PM10/31/12
to
On 10/31/12 8:24 PM, Jordy Chase wrote:
> I think George W Cal may have a bit of that wise "comfort the afflicted, afflict the comfortable" attitude... Ironically, I do as well...with me, it's directed from somewhat of a "limosuine liberal" pov towards conservatives... with him, it's more from a liberal pov towards some conservatives as well as "limousine liberals"...
>

i don't have a general theory about why i treat you like i do, but i'm
pretty sure i'd treat you with more kindness if you ran your stuff
through a spell-checker, showed a little modesty, and stopped reposting
the same little collection of bubble-headed shit year after year.

i still wouldn't have an iota of respect for where you claim to stand
politically and spiritually, but i could probably manage to be less
contemptuous in my choice of words, or even to ignore you completely.

this is a peace offering, btw. kind of a take it or leave it thing. it's
all the same to me.

%

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 9:44:08 PM10/31/12
to

"cal" <cal...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:k6sj2j$jma$1...@dont-email.me...
cement + head = cement head

and notice how cal posts the same ,
bubble-headed shit year after year about what jordy does

mixed nuts

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 10:13:10 PM10/31/12
to
If that's the schtick, yes.

Smart people usually come up with the best words, but anybody can play:

http://www.wetcanvas.com/forums/showthread.php?t=246385

--
Dinsdale
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Jordy Chase

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 10:32:59 PM10/31/12
to
sorry thor, but when i need writing lessons, i think the best teacher for me wouldn't be someone who writes like this... never capatlizing isn't exactly considered excellent grammar...

Jordy Chase

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 10:40:02 PM10/31/12
to
sorry, i spelled "capitalizing wrong". hope that isn't a criminal offense. no more than never capitalizing words is, I imagine.

Rhiannon

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 10:44:53 PM10/31/12
to
Do you feel better now that you've had a good cry?
--
Rhi

Message has been deleted

Jordy Chase

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 11:00:01 PM10/31/12
to
It really is rather sad that Cal feels such hostility towards certain *strangers* on the internet who he's never met and who have never done anything to him... oh well, if it makes him feel good to lash out in such a nasty, childish, mean spirited, belligerent way, that's certainly his choice...

cal

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 11:24:09 PM10/31/12
to
On 10/31/12 10:32 PM, Jordy Chase wrote:
> sorry thor, but when i need writing lessons, i think the best teacher for me wouldn't be someone who writes like this... never capatlizing isn't exactly considered excellent grammar...
>

who said anything about teaching you? not part of the deal.

cal

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 11:24:20 PM10/31/12
to
On 10/31/12 10:15 PM, Janithor wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
> Thank G*d you are here to save us from Jordy's poor writing skills.

down, frodo. no. no more kisses. i know you missed me, but i didn't
realize you missed me so much! it's embarrassing.

> I don't know what we'd do without you.

oh gee... same shit you do now, i expect. sit up waiting for posts all
night, drink bier, play with your junk, collect youtubes... work through
various issues... don't worry, you'd be fine.

question for you. why do you splat god, to fool him into thinking you
mean someone else? to fool me? or to fool yourself?

hmmm. i think i'd better have a talk your frau before you completely
lose your mind.

cal

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 11:24:44 PM10/31/12
to
On 10/31/12 10:40 PM, Jordy Chase wrote:
> sorry, i spelled "capitalizing wrong". hope that isn't a criminal offense. no more than never capitalizing words is, I imagine.
>

see, i knew you could do it on your own. capitalizing, not capatalizing.

it's not a criminal offence, it just makes you look like a moron.

now i'll make you an offer. if you write ten posts without a spelling
mistake, i'll not only use the shift key correctly for ten posts, i'll
get off your case for the duration. how about it? could that BE more fair?
Message has been deleted

%

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 11:42:20 PM10/31/12
to

"cal" <cal...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:k6sq0q$j6l$1...@dont-email.me...
dumped

%

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 11:42:36 PM10/31/12
to

"cal" <cal...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:k6sq15$j82$1...@dont-email.me...
dumped

%

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 11:42:50 PM10/31/12
to

"Janithor" <Jani...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:k6sq51$hg2$1...@news.albasani.net...
> x-no-archive: yes
> Personality disorder.


dumped

%

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 11:43:05 PM10/31/12
to

"cal" <cal...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:k6sq1s$j6l$4...@dont-email.me...
dumped

mixed nuts

unread,
Oct 31, 2012, 11:47:36 PM10/31/12
to
On 10/31/2012 11:26 PM, Janithor wrote:
> On 10/31/2012 8:24 PM, cal wrote:
> Personality disorder.

It just occurred to me that east coast janitors are going to be "rakin'
it in" - there's a lot of s't needs cleaning. Overtime.

--
Grizzly H.
Message has been deleted

%

unread,
Nov 1, 2012, 12:09:05 AM11/1/12
to

"mixed nuts" <melops...@undulatus.budgie> wrote in message
news:k6srcp$9it$1...@speranza.aioe.org...
get on with the right outfit its a good go ,
hook up with the board of ED janithors and ,
25 bucks an hour full benifits its a yay

%

unread,
Nov 1, 2012, 12:44:14 AM11/1/12
to

"Janithor" <Jani...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:k6ssad$l2c$1...@news.albasani.net...
> x-no-archive: yes
> We should have more natural disasters, good job creators.
>


we even have a special restoration team ,
a woman owns the company i think her name is , " Dianne " ,
they look after fires and floods and that sort of malarkey

mixed nuts

unread,
Nov 1, 2012, 7:22:43 AM11/1/12
to
On 11/1/2012 12:03 AM, Janithor wrote:
> On 10/31/2012 8:47 PM, mixed nuts wrote:
> We should have more natural disasters, good job creators.
>

Most of the money comes from the federal gummint. The insurance
companies don't pay for floods (you have to get it through FEMA), the
states don't have enough because of already cutting budgets to the bone
and laying off most of the maintenance department and hiring private
contractors. Most private individuals don't have fix-up money just
laying around - they'll have to borrow. The banks don't like to loan
because they prefer to put federal bailout money into bonuses and
acquisitions and nice boardroom and lobby woodwork and whatnot. So
it'll be an economic stimulus paid for by the taxpayer - commie socialism.

If I were a patriotic conservative janitor, I wouldn't take a penny of
that. And I won't work for free. We should let private investors (and
charitable organizations) work their magic like in New Orleans.

yay!

--
Grizzly H.

cal

unread,
Nov 1, 2012, 9:59:45 AM11/1/12
to
i see what you mean. some of those are hilarious.

cal

unread,
Nov 1, 2012, 10:00:08 AM11/1/12
to
On 10/31/12 11:26 PM, Janithor wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
>> hmmm. i think i'd better have a talk with your frau before you
>> completely lose your mind.
>
>
> Personality disorder.

rats, this was the second time i blew the timing yesterday. both times,
i was going to ask tara if she wanted to see me make you say,
"personality disorder" before you said it. but your reflexes are too
quick, you son of a gun.
0 new messages