Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

(Squick) Why do people do this?!

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Spandau

unread,
Sep 25, 2003, 12:57:11 PM9/25/03
to


>Yet another example of Baby Roob syndrome.
>
Baby Roob was cuter. :-)

>Why do pahrunts plaster
>pictures of their miscarriages all over the internet? It boggles the
>mind. Not only has this one posted pictures, she has thumbnails that
>lead to larger "more detailed" pictures.
>
The 'impressionistic' photo (with the painted-on eyes) looks like a
cross between the Creature From the Black Lagoon and a sea monkey.
Ecchhh.

Spandau

Citizen Ted

unread,
Sep 25, 2003, 9:07:36 PM9/25/03
to
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:11:45 -0700, Lorzie <lo...@pacifier.com> wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>
>Yet another example of Baby Roob syndrome. Why do pahrunts plaster


>pictures of their miscarriages all over the internet? It boggles the
>mind. Not only has this one posted pictures, she has thumbnails that
>lead to larger "more detailed" pictures.
>

>http://scribers.neondsl.com/lisa/mariam3.htm

Looks like a miniature Wilford Brimley after 5 days floating in the
Hudson River.

- TR
- creating a website memorializing my adenoids.

NotTheDroidYou'reLookingFor

unread,
Sep 26, 2003, 12:17:43 AM9/26/03
to
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:11:45 -0700, Lorzie <lo...@pacifier.com> wrote:

>x-no-archive: yes
>
>Yet another example of Baby Roob syndrome. Why do pahrunts plaster
>pictures of their miscarriages all over the internet? It boggles the
>mind. Not only has this one posted pictures, she has thumbnails that
>lead to larger "more detailed" pictures.

Because it helps them deal with a kind of grief of which you obviously
have no concept. Why does this offend you so much?

Monique

unread,
Sep 26, 2003, 2:40:41 AM9/26/03
to
> Because it helps them deal with a kind of grief of which you obviously
> have no concept. Why does this offend you so much?

Putting a picture up is one, but paint it aswel? brrr sorry my stomac turns.

Monique


Gregory Morrow

unread,
Sep 26, 2003, 7:37:09 AM9/26/03
to

Lorzie wrote:

> x-no-archive: yes
>
> Yet another example of Baby Roob syndrome. Why do pahrunts plaster
> pictures of their miscarriages all over the internet? It boggles the
> mind. Not only has this one posted pictures, she has thumbnails that
> lead to larger "more detailed" pictures.
>

> http://scribers.neondsl.com/lisa/mariam3.htm


GAWD!

If I wanna see dead babies I'll pull out my copy of _Wisconsin Death
Trip_.....

--
Best
Greg


elizabeth

unread,
Sep 26, 2003, 8:40:26 AM9/26/03
to
NotTheDroidYou'reLookingFor <fake...@fakedomain.com> wrote in message news:<acf7nv8gcoufvt3ke...@4ax.com>...

Troll, dearie, did you look at the site? did you see the
"impressionist" painting she made of a half rotted fetus, with its
eyes open?

That woman is a whack job in need of some serious counseling. Now go
back to surfing for kiddie porn featuring beastiality, to help you
with your own whack issues.

stePH

unread,
Sep 26, 2003, 9:47:08 AM9/26/03
to
elizabeth wrote:

> Now go
> back to surfing for kiddie porn featuring beastiality, to help you
> with your own whack issues.

Or just to "whack" to ... :p

stePH
--
NP: X (Japan), "Dahlia"

Veronique

unread,
Sep 26, 2003, 12:55:56 PM9/26/03
to
NotTheDroidYou'reLookingFor <fake...@fakedomain.com> wrote in message news:<acf7nv8gcoufvt3ke...@4ax.com>...


Because it's a public display in poor taste. If the photos are
important to the putative parents, I have no objection to whatever
private memorial they want to erect. But the internet is public, and
displaying dead bodies on the internet shows rather more
sensationalism and rather less respect for the tragedy the miscarriage
apparently had on their lives. It reeks of narcissism and an inability
to separate private emotion from appropriate public behavior.

V.
--
Veronique Chez Sheep

Lorzie

unread,
Sep 26, 2003, 7:08:47 PM9/26/03
to
Veronique wrote:

> Because it's a public display in poor taste. If the photos are
> important to the putative parents, I have no objection to whatever
> private memorial they want to erect. But the internet is public, and
> displaying dead bodies on the internet shows rather more
> sensationalism and rather less respect for the tragedy the miscarriage
> apparently had on their lives. It reeks of narcissism and an inability
> to separate private emotion from appropriate public behavior.

Perfect explanation! Thank you.

Citizen Ted

unread,
Sep 27, 2003, 3:51:03 AM9/27/03
to

Oh, it doesn't *offend* me. It just confirms my belief that the vast
bulk of humanity is a chittering, ejaculating horde of retarded
chimpanzees who, if judged by an objective third party, would be swept
from the Earth like the plague of locusts they really are.

By the way: when you shat out that unfit blob of unviable tissue mass,
did you give it a name? I think you should have called it "Matt",
because that's the only purpose it might serve, placed just outside
the screen door of your double-wide.

I only wish I was there when Matt made his hurried exit from your
gaping vulva. I'd have paid money to taste the tears that rolled down
your face.

To that end: wanna fuck?

Maybe we can produce another Darwinian failure, only this time I'll
have the chance to enjoys its company for a while.

Hugs n' Kisses,

- TR


Saerah Bennett

unread,
Sep 27, 2003, 5:16:14 AM9/27/03
to

Citizen Ted wrote in message <3f753fbe...@netnews.comcast.net>...

Lorzie

unread,
Sep 27, 2003, 12:00:08 PM9/27/03
to
Citizen Ted wrote:

> Oh, it doesn't *offend* me. It just confirms my belief that the vast
> bulk of humanity is a chittering, ejaculating horde of retarded
> chimpanzees who, if judged by an objective third party, would be swept
> from the Earth like the plague of locusts they really are.
>
> By the way: when you shat out that unfit blob of unviable tissue mass,
> did you give it a name? I think you should have called it "Matt",
> because that's the only purpose it might serve, placed just outside
> the screen door of your double-wide.
>
> I only wish I was there when Matt made his hurried exit from your
> gaping vulva. I'd have paid money to taste the tears that rolled down
> your face.
>
> To that end: wanna fuck?
>
> Maybe we can produce another Darwinian failure, only this time I'll
> have the chance to enjoys its company for a while.
>
> Hugs n' Kisses,
>
> - TR

Holy crap, that was funny! My cackling probably woke the neighbors, but it
was worth it.

NotTheDroidYou'reLookingFor

unread,
Sep 27, 2003, 2:45:38 PM9/27/03
to
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 07:51:03 GMT, enoi...@dumpthiscomcast.net
(Citizen Ted) wrote:

>On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 04:17:43 GMT, NotTheDroidYou'reLookingFor
><fake...@fakedomain.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:11:45 -0700, Lorzie <lo...@pacifier.com> wrote:
>>
>>>x-no-archive: yes
>>>
>>>Yet another example of Baby Roob syndrome. Why do pahrunts plaster
>>>pictures of their miscarriages all over the internet? It boggles the
>>>mind. Not only has this one posted pictures, she has thumbnails that
>>>lead to larger "more detailed" pictures.
>>
>>Because it helps them deal with a kind of grief of which you obviously
>>have no concept. Why does this offend you so much?
>
>Oh, it doesn't *offend* me. It just confirms my belief that the vast
>bulk of humanity is a chittering, ejaculating horde of retarded
>chimpanzees who, if judged by an objective third party, would be swept
>from the Earth like the plague of locusts they really are.

Except you, of course. You'd make the cut, right?

I've never offered an online opinon about dead baby pages. FTR, I
find them oddly fascinating, and think they run the gamut from
somewhat tasteful to completely over-the-top. That some people choose
to deal with their grief this way doesn't really bother me, though.
Public ridicule of such does, however -- as does much of the
sanctimoniousness of ASCF.

>By the way: when you shat out that unfit blob of unviable tissue mass,
>did you give it a name? I think you should have called it "Matt",
>because that's the only purpose it might serve, placed just outside
>the screen door of your double-wide.

I live in a house, actually, but the trailer reference was pretty
funny. I'll have to remember that one!

I've never had a miscarriage. Had an abortion once, but it'd be
pretty fucking hypocritical of me to have given it a name, I think.

>I only wish I was there when Matt made his hurried exit from your
>gaping vulva. I'd have paid money to taste the tears that rolled down
>your face.

The aforementioned termination is the only thing that's made a hurried
exit from my vulva, and it wasn't all that gaping at the time. Aside
from the 1000+ times (give or take a few) I've had sex, my snatch is
as tight as virgin's.

>To that end: wanna fuck?

Only if you let me anally violate you with a 15" dildo, while I
fellate you to orgasm, *before* we do the deed. I like my boys to
last awhile.

>Maybe we can produce another Darwinian failure, only this time I'll
>have the chance to enjoys its company for a while.

Alas, I'm on the pill. Sorry to disappoint.


NotTheDroidYou'reLookingFor

unread,
Sep 27, 2003, 2:49:33 PM9/27/03
to
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 09:00:08 -0700, Lorzie <lo...@pacifier.com> wrote:

>Citizen Ted wrote:
(snip Ted's off-the-mark, albeit witty attempt to flame me)

>Holy crap, that was funny! My cackling probably woke the neighbors, but it
>was worth it.

I'm sure Ted can expect a tongue-lashing from Caine for responding to
a troll.

Aside to Caine: honey, lighten up. You need to get laid or take a
shit or something.

Joann Evans

unread,
Sep 28, 2003, 12:32:47 AM9/28/03
to

This is a form of dealing?

There are people who consider it improper to merely photograph an
intact, well preserved adult body at an open-casket ceremony (or to even
do open casket in general) for one's self. Why post fetal pix (not very
appealing, even when normal) where the whole world can see?

I've had people die, who were much closer to me than any stillborn
fetus, so make no assumptions as to how anyone here can feel or display
grief....

Jason G

unread,
Sep 28, 2003, 1:42:45 AM9/28/03
to
legion <the...@the.many> made obeisance before Us and spake thusly:
>
>It's a waste of good meat.
snip

Uh, YUCK.

That was sick.

--
Jason G
[Sig closed for remodeling. We apologize for the inconvenience.]

BookWyrm

unread,
Sep 28, 2003, 10:51:43 AM9/28/03
to
jrgusenet@xx_REMOVE_x_THIS_xx_PART_xxx_x_yahoo.com says...

>
> legion <the...@the.many> made obeisance before Us and spake thusly:
>>
>>It's a waste of good meat.
>snip
>
>Uh, YUCK.
>
>That was sick.

But funny.

--
The *only* way to compensate for the environmental impact of having a
child is to go out and kill one before you get pregnant. -Darth Ammer, ascf

Jason G

unread,
Sep 28, 2003, 1:39:37 PM9/28/03
to
zenNOSP...@blacksNOSPAMburg.net (BookWyrm) made obeisance before Us and spake thusly:

>jrgusenet@xx_REMOVE_x_THIS_xx_PART_xxx_x_yahoo.com says...
>>
>> legion <the...@the.many> made obeisance before Us and spake thusly:
>>>
>>>It's a waste of good meat.
>>snip
>>
>>Uh, YUCK.
>>
>>That was sick.
>
>But funny.
>

To me that one was just sick.


--
Jason G
Note to frothing-at-the-mouth free speechers: I said to me. I'm not the
alt.tasteless type so I found that in, surprise, poor taste. And I'm also
just about full-up on violence, gore and death from reading "Obsidian
Butterfly" this week.

0 new messages