A war on several fronts: who to trust and who can help?
Donte
myself and both of our families are in a horrible law mess to try and
get our three year old son back following the death of his five month
old brother. I am unable to really go into detail in a public forum
because there are still open investigations. what I can say are the
following:
1)the maternal grandparents home is unable to be accessed.
2) A judge ruled for our son to be placed with the paternal
grandparents (my parents). We were given UNlimited and UNsupervised
visitation. At all times the child WAS supervised by his paternal
grandparents as was the visitation, though it needn't be.
3) NO set of visitation guidelines was ever given to the paternal
granparents. No paperwork at all was. not even a copy of the safety
checklist from the DEFACS walkthrough.
4) On Tuesday, January 10th, A DEFACS case worker appeared at the
paernal grandparents home with two police officers. She removed the
child. Her reasons were that my wife and I were in violation by having
stayed the night with the child at my parents home, and that because it
was after dark, we were not to be there. We asked to see her court
order, she would not produce one. The police would not enforce any of
the grandparents rights, Defacs was able to have their way.
5)My three year old son has an auditory and learning disorder for which
the mother and I had set appointments up for. These disabilities have
been written off by the department.
6)The lawyers fees are becoming out of hand.
7) Every one at DEFACS who we have spoke to has referred us on to one
"supervisor" or another, though in fact all these supervisors are at
the same level.
8) DEFACS states that the grandparents were in "violation" of their
guidelines which were never given to the grandparents, nor discussed
with. They are saying that these rules had been gone over in the
initial "TDM" meeting, even though no one in either family present
remember this, and even though this meeting took place before the judge
had made his ruling.
9) The judge states that his role in the courtroom is advisory, we know
this is true. He was municipal...
10) The reason that the doctor had called DEFACS in the first place has
turned out to be a misdiagnosis on his part.
As I said before, the lawyers fees are stacking up. I understand that
this is their business, but the billing is getting atrocious. All
families involved are becoming bankrupted between the family lawyer and
the criminal lawyer we have waiting to step in should charges be filed.
We have been in contact with the governors office to members on the
board of Human Resources. We are trying to be as pro-active as
possible.
Can anyone provide us any more possible leads to help get our son at
least placed back with the paternal grandparents?
Is an emergency hearing more likely to be beneficial for us at this
point?
Has anyone had a like experience like this?
Please help us if you can.
kathleen
I would consider looking into the option of filing a Motion for
Administrative
Review. This usually sends CPS into a panic, where they then file
false criminal charges against a parent.
Therefore, notify your State and local police, and FBI, that you will
be
doing this first. Notify also, the Chief State's Attorney's office and
as
many of the local State's Attorney's offices that you can find, and let
them all know your intent.
There are some examples of the CT DCF doing this to parents, and
several other incidents we know about, but are not listed on the
website.
For example, I filed this motion for an Administrative Review on March
25, 2004:
http://actionlyme.org/MOTION_FOR_ADMINISTRATIVE_REVIEW.htm
And that very evening DCF's AAG Jessica Gauvin filed a totally false
police
report to the Berlin Police on her way home from work.
http://actionlyme.org More of the story there, and of the "frauds on
the court."
Here is another case where a foster parent filed a Motion for an
Administrative
Review and then the DCF, knowing they were liable, decided to
criminally charge
the foster parent with child abuse:
http://actionlyme.org/CARROLL_VS_RAGAGLIA.htm
Whenever these assholes are caught breaking the law, they file
a false police report against their victims. Therefore contact the
police
first, and preferably your state and federally elected representatives
even
before the police.
Describe the case, mention your intent, mention these other cases.
Then, when all are aware that you are motioning for an Administrative
Review, fax the Motion for the Review.
Don't make any moves that could be considered in violation of any
law, Don't contact CPS, Don't make any unwitnessed or unrecorded phone
calls, Be aware that the CPS has bugged your phones and knows about
all conversations you are having with your lawyer, and therefore these
conversations have to take place in person.
They are watching every move you make, and will try to disrupt
any defensive action you are taking.
Therefore, when you notify State and Federal law enforcement of your
intent, use someone else's phone or a pay phone.
Notify everyone you know, personally, about your intentions: The
doctors who care for your child, the schools, the daycare, your
employers,... But do not use your own phone.
Get to work on this right away. I believe you are entitled to 10
days to contest the order or warrant for the child's removal.
The worst thing you can do is sit back and do nothing, because they
are spending ALL of their time conspiring against you, and throwing
all of their effort into screwing you over, frightening your friends
and
frightening every one you know.
It's a power game. It's not about children.
Kathleen
Yukon King
kathleen wrote:
> First thing to know: CPS bugs your phones.
This doesn't have the first goddamned thing to do with Lyme disease.
Yukon King
kathleen wrote:
CERTES, said Gawaine, soothly have ye said, that I see it
openly. Now, I pray you, good man and holy father, tell
me why we met not with so many adventures as we were
wont to do, and commonly have the better. I shall tell
you gladly, said the good man; the adventure of the
Sangreal which ye and many other have undertaken the
quest of it and find it not, the cause is for it appeareth
not to sinners. Wherefore marvel not though ye fail
thereof, and many other. For ye be an untrue knight
and a great murderer, and to good men signifieth other
things than murder. For I dare say, as sinful as Sir
Launcelot hath been, sith that he went into the quest of
the Sangreal he slew never man, nor nought shall, till that
he come unto Camelot again, for he hath taken upon him
for to forsake sin. And nere that he nis not stable, but
by his thought he is likely to turn again, he should be next
to enchieve it save Galahad, his son. But God knoweth his
thought and his unstableness, and yet shall he die right an
holy man, and no doubt he hath no fellow of no earthly
sinful man. Sir, said Gawaine, it seemeth me by your words
that for our sins it will not avail us to travel in this quest
Truly, said the good man, there be an hundred such as ye
be that never shall prevail, but to have shame. And when
they had heard these voices they commended him unto
God.
Then the good man called Gawaine, and said: It is
long time passed sith that ye were made knight, and never
sithen thou servedst thy Maker, and now thou art so old
a tree that in thee is neither life nor fruit; wherefore bethink
thee that thou yield to Our Lord the bare rind, sith
the fiend hath the leaves and the fruit. Sir, said Gawaine
an I had leisure I would speak with you, but my fellow
here, Sir Ector, is gone, and abideth me yonder beneath
the hill. Well, said the good man, thou were better to be
counselled. Then departed Gawaine and came to Ector,
and so took their horses and rode till they came to a
forester's house, which harboured them right well. And
on the morn they departed from their host, and rode long
or they could find any adventure.
kathleen
I would consider looking into the option of filing a Motion for
Kathleen
- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Reply