Posted: Apr. 29, 2009
Oxford, N.C. — Sixteen-year-old Ashton Lundeby's bedroom in his
mother's Granville County home is nothing, if not patriotic. Images of
American flags are everywhere – on the bed, on the floor, on the wall.
But according to the United States government, the tenth-grade home-
schooler is being held on a criminal complaint that he made a bomb
threat from his home on the night of Feb. 15.
WATCH VIDEO
http://www.wral.com/news/local/video/5050332/
Teen's mom questions Patriot Act
The family was at a church function that night, his mother, Annette
Lundeby, said.
"Undoubtedly, they were given false information, or they would not
have had 12 agents in my house with a widow and two children and three
cats," Lundeby said.
Around 10 p.m. on March 5, Lundeby said, armed FBI agents along with
three local law enforcement officers stormed her home looking for her
son. They handcuffed him and presented her with a search warrant.
"I was terrified," Lundeby's mother said. "There were guns, and I
don't allow guns around my children. I don't believe in guns."
Lundeby told the officers that someone had hacked into her son's IP
address and was using it to make crank calls connected through the
Internet, making it look like the calls had originated from her home
when they did not.
Her argument was ignored, she said. Agents seized a computer, a cell
phone, gaming console, routers, bank statements and school records,
according to federal search warrants.
"There were no bomb-making materials, not even a blasting cap, not
even a wire," Lundeby said.
Ashton now sits in a juvenile facility in South Bend, Ind. His mother
has had little access to him since his arrest. She has gone to her
state representatives as well as attorneys, seeking assistance, but,
she said, there is nothing she can do.
Lundeby said the USA Patriot Act stripped her son of his due process
rights.
"We have no rights under the Patriot Act to even defend them, because
the Patriot Act basically supersedes the Constitution," she said. "It
wasn't intended to drag your barely 16-year-old, 120-pound son out in
the middle of the night on a charge that we can't even defend."
Passed after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the U.S., the
Patriot Act allows federal agents to investigate suspected cases of
terrorism swiftly to better protect the country. In part, it gives the
federal government more latitude to search telephone records, e-mails
and other records.
"They're saying that 'We feel this individual is a terrorist or an
enemy combatant against the United States, and we're going to suspend
all of those due process rights because this person is an enemy of the
United States," said Dan Boyce, a defense attorney and former U.S.
attorney not connected to the Lundeby case.
Critics of the statute say it threatens the most basic of liberties.
"There's nothing a matter of public record," Boyce said "All those
normal rights are just suspended in the air."
In a bi-partisan effort, Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., and Rep. Jeff
Flake, R-Ariz., last month introduced in the U.S. House of
Representatives a bill that would narrow subpoena power in a provision
of the Patriot Act, called the National Security Letters, to curb what
some consider to be abuse of power by federal law enforcement
officers.
Boyce said the Patriot Act was written with good intentions, but he
said he believes it has gone too far in some cases. Lundeby's might be
one of them, he said.
"It very well could be a case of overreaction, where an agent leaped
to certain conclusions or has made certain assumptions about this
individual and about how serious the threat really is," Boyce said.
Because a federal judge issued a gag order in the case, the U.S.
attorney in Indiana cannot comment on the case, nor can the FBI. The
North Carolina Highway Patrol did confirm that officers assisted with
the FBI operation at the Lundeby home on March 5.
"Never in my worst nightmare did I ever think that it would be my own
government that I would have to protect my children from," Lundeby
said. "This is the United States, and I feel like I live in a third
world country now."
Lundeby said she does not think this type of case is what the Patriot
Act was intended for. Boyce agrees.
"It was to protect the public, but what we need to do is to make sure
there are checks and balances to make sure those new laws are not
abused," he said.
KW > Now, now. Greg has only molested one child, by
KW > HIS standards of proof. Lisa's six or seven year
KW > old daughter is, as far as we know, his only victim.
Dan admits he was investigated for Child Abuse
more than TWENTY TIMES and was founded 5 times.
There there, let it ALL out, Dan!
Kent's a two time THIEVING Felon, for burglarizing a garage!
And a notoriously stupid liar.
KW > Odd that you've been UNABLE to prove even one lie from me.
I'll leave that to others, Kent!
You can thank Dan for the inspiration!
Odd that no one else has been able.
> You can thank Dan for the inspiration!
You give him too much credit. My exposing you for the lying, drug
addled scum you were, are and will be, wasn't influenced by Dan in any way.
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, or proving he's so
stupid he thinks I'm Asian.
MID:<c6bac3f6-7a0e-4bf8-8ddd-d77bccfc6...@p49g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/msg/395db830731df54a
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
On Sun, 10 May 2009, Kent Wills <comp...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>"Greegor" <Gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:c9e12046-a98e-42c8...@o20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com...
>>G > And a notoriously stupid liar.
>>
>> KW > Odd that you've been UNABLE to prove even one lie from me.
>>
>> I'll leave that to others, Kent!
>
> Odd that no one else has been able.
>
>> You can thank Dan for the inspiration!
>
> You give him too much credit. My exposing you for the lying, drug
>addled scum you were, are and will be, wasn't influenced by Dan in any way.
I also note that Greg has abandoned his previous assertion, that you and
Dan are the same person (message ID
<189d5266-1d60-43a6...@w74g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>)
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
criminals
"[I have] [n]ever had [any] standing in the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyer's
Association or AN Y connection to them."
- --Ken Pangborn in a usenet post on January 1, 2009, denying affiliation
with the TCDLA, to whom he provided bogus educational credentials. His lie
is disproved here:
http://web.archive.org/web/20060822021821/www.tcdla.com/secure/experts/inde
x.shtml
"Some photo of some girl without even any documentation on THAT only proves
that YOU are a PSYCHO! A really STUPID one at that!"
- --Ken Pangborn, admitting to being a "stupid" "psycho" in message-ID
<jOp3l.292$Es4...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>
"The FACT is that [my mail-order wife Barbara Sanciprian] and I were
introduced in the FORMAL Spanish tradition by mutual friends, and were
married first in Cuba after 2 year courtship."
- --Ken Pangborn, admitting that he began cheating on his wife Peggy on
September 28, 2001, nearly two years before she separated from him
"I'm David Moore and I am insane!"
- --Ken Pangborn posting to alt.dads-rights.unmoderated, attempting to claim
that his name is David Moore
"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll cripple
you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out, I'll be able to walk,
but you will still be a cripple."
- --Pangborn puppet Greg Hanson of alt.support.child-protective-services **,
in a verbal threat to his girlfriend
** - this conclusion was reached via applying Ken and Greg's logic
Keywords: false allegations,sexual abuse,marital rape, date rape, sexual
harassment,child abuse,domestic violence,rape allegations,false allegations
of child abuse,false rape allegations,false abuse accusations,false
accusations,recovered memories,child sexual abuse,abuse child,sexual
assault,child molestation,reactive attachment disorder,penile
plethysmograph,polygraph,attorneys,divorce,visitation,pedophiles
More-keywords: KRP CONSULTING. False allegations of child abuse, false
abuse accusations, false domestic violence allegations help, false rape
allegations, abuse child, sexual abuse, child sexual abuse, false
allegations, false accusations, recovered memories, sexual assault, child
molestation, child sexual abuse, reactive attachment disorder, penile
plethysmograph, polygraph, trial consulting, jury consulting, jury
selection, jury voire dire, wrongful allegations, false child sexual abuse
allegations. Wrongful child sexual abuse allegations. Domestic Violence.
Rape. Marital rape. Date Rape. Confidence Rape.
Yet-more-keywords: ken pangborn,kenneth pangborn,barbara pangborn,barbara
sanciprian,palm harbor,tampa,attorneys,florida lawyers,florida
attorneys,tampa lawyers,tampa attorneys,trial consultant,trial
consulting,dui,domestic violence,vawa,abuse,3648 cockatoo,new port
richey,ernesto sanciprian,ernesto miguel blanco sanciprian,blanco
sanciprian,bryce carter,holguin,julio aguilar,yudith bacallao,raimundo
cabrera,ana hernandez chi,lixandro cordero,leandis diaz,al faisbuker,wendy
gil,armando capo ramos,george riveron,reinaldo rodriguez,lexis ross,liana
yisell alvarez silveira,madelyn tamayo,manuel toledo,thais valdes
Extra-keywords: Julito Sainz,craig clawson,lia yisell
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQA/AwUBSgdEjCjl4QPoqs6fEQJ/dgCg1GcgxLT+ET6R2sw+tIJnTaX4TxoAoMGG
W2HSVNl/UJcYx0h38BEQJdMk
=UM+L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
grag now thinks Moe is Kent.
What part of me asking if Moe is actually Kent gave you a clue?
Kent Bradley Wills DOB Jan 8 1969 Felony Garage Burglar used teen as
accomplice
TWO of Kent Wills' usenet newsgroup identities:
WILLS, KENT B [ Collected March 7, 2009]
Age: 40
Rogers, AR
Ankeny, IA
Marshalltown, IA
Bartlett, IL
Villa Park, IL
And from another source: Hanover Park, IL
WILLS, FREDERICK ALFRED (Kent's Dad 65 )
WILLS, MICHAEL A (Kent's son ??)
WILLS, JANET RAE (Kent's Mom 62 )
HARTWIG,TIFFANY JEANNE (Wills) (Kent's sister )
From another source: Kelly M Wills Kent's wife ?? )
( Samantha T Wills, Kathleen M Wills, James Wills )
--------------------------------------------------------
Pay close attention to past owners of 202 NW College Ave.
Kent made affirmative claims about the property online.
Kent's folks sold it in 1994 while Kent lived there!
On 03/30/1999 Sweeney's filed on Kent for UNPAID RENT!
GeoParcel 8024-15-452-029 District/Parcel 181/00392-048-000
[ As Collected March 7, 2009 ]
Seller: WILLS, FRED A. & JANET R.
Buyer: THE SWEENEY REVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST
04/26/1994 135,000 D/Deed 7010/188
-
Seller: SHELDAHL, ERIC A.
Buyer: WILLS, FRED
01/02/1990 130,500 D/Deed 6189/972
A Larger photo:
http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-bin/seephoto/photosize.cgi?gp=802415452029&size=Large
Notice that name SWEENEY above?
Check this out!
Iowa Courts Docket and Disposition web site
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/
Iowa Courts
Online Search
< Start A Case Search Here! > click
Iowa Courts Online Search
Search Selection
Under Trial Court < click on Case Search >
Wills Kent B
02401 ESPR015146 INA J WILLS ESTATE
05771 FECR145250 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
05771 FECR176876 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
05771 SCSC310505 SWEENEY RENTALS VS KENT ******
05771 SCSC335210 CITI FINANCIAL VS KENT
05771 SCSC374163 SFI F SCHERLE PRES VS KENT
05771 SCSC374164 SFI F SCHERLE III PRES VS KENT
05771 STAN201670 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969
05771 STAN210929 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969
05771 SWCR177169 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
A list of case numbers will be presented.
Click on the SWEENEY case, 4th one down.
Under the "Filings" tab:
JUDGEMENT DEFAULT BRANDT GREGORY D 08/25/1999 09/01/1999 09/01/1999
Comments: $156.25 7.244% FROM 03/30/99
COMPUTER GENERATED NOTICE 05/11/1999 05/11/1999 05/11/1999
Comments: Notice of Proof of Claim
RETURN OF ORIGINAL NOTICE 04/21/1999 04/23/1999 04/23/1999
Comments: 4/10/99 KENT PERS
37.60
VERIFICATION OF ACCT HAS BEEN FILED 03/30/1999 03/30/1999
03/30/1999
SMALL CLAIMS ORIGINAL NOTICE SWEENEY RENTALS 03/30/1999 03/30/1999
03/30/1999
Comments: UNPAID RENT
Under the "Financial" Tab:
Summary Orig Paid Due
COSTS 98.60 31.00 67.60
FINE 0.00 0.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 0.00
RESTITUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00
OTHER 238.46 0.00 238.46
-----------
$337.06 $31.00 $306.06
SUPPORT/ALIMONY N/A 0.00 N/A
-------------------------------------
Do It Yourself Instructions to look up Kent's record
Iowa Department of Corrections records for Kent
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
Name Kent Bradley Wills [ As Collected March 7, 2009 ]
Offender Number 1155768
Sex M
Birth Date 01/08/1969
Age 40
Location
Offense
County Of Commitment
Commitment Date
Duration
TDD/SDD *
* TDD = Tentative Discharge Date
* SDD = Supervision Discharge Date
Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date
Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk 12/16/2008
Probation C Felony Polk 12/16/2008
Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date
Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk 11/25/2003
Iowa Courts Docket and Disposition web site
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/
Iowa Courts
Online Search
< Start A Case Search Here! > click
Iowa Courts Online Search
Search Selection
Under Trial Court < click on Case Search >
Wills Kent B
02401 ESPR015146 INA J WILLS ESTATE
05771 FECR145250 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
05771 FECR176876 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
05771 SCSC310505 SWEENEY RENTALS VS KENT
05771 SCSC335210 CITI FINANCIAL VS KENT
05771 SCSC374163 SFI F SCHERLE PRES VS KENT
05771 SCSC374164 SFI F SCHERLE III PRES VS KENT
05771 STAN201670 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969
05771 STAN210929 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969
05771 SWCR177169 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
A list of case numbers will be presented.
Two on that list have the code "FE" in them.
One of the two ends in the two digits "76".
Click that case number.
A case caption will appear.
Tabs available to the public include
"Criminal Charges", "Filings" and "Financial".
Use the "back" button on your browser to move among them
or just hit the various tab buttons.
(See filings text if attached further down below)
IN PRINTED LAW BOOKS
West's North Western Reporter
Second Series
A Unit of the National Reporter System
Volume 696 N.W.2d
Cite as 696 N.W.2d 20 (Iowa 2005)
Kent's Appeal
http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/Supreme_Court/Recent_Opinions/20050506/04-0202.asp?Printable=true
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ia&vol=sc%5C20050506%5C04-0202&invol=1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005
STATE OF IOWA,
Appellee,
vs.
KENT BRADLEY WILLS,
Appellant.
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk
County, Michael D. Huppert, Judge.
Defendant appeals claiming ineffective
assistance of counsel. AFFIRMED.
Linda Del Gallo, State Appellate Defender,
and Tricia Johnston, Assistant State
Appellate Defender, for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kevin
Cmelik, Assistant Attorney General, John P.
Sarcone, County Attorney, and John Judisch,
Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.
WIGGINS, Justice.
Kent Wills appeals his conviction for
second-degree burglary contending that
an attached garage is a separate occupied
structure from that of the living quarters
of the residence. In this appeal, we must
determine whether trial counsel was
ineffective for (1) failing to move for
judgment of acquittal on the basis there
was insufficient evidence to convict Wills
of second-degree burglary when he entered
an attached garage of a residence when no
persons were present in the garage, but
when persons were present in the living
quarters; and (2) failing to object to a
jury instruction based on this same
argument. Because we find there was no
legal basis for the motion for judgment
of acquittal or the objection to the jury
instruction, Wills' trial counsel was not
ineffective. Accordingly, we affirm the
judgment of the district court.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings.
Around 1 a.m., an Ankeny resident called
the local police to report that a car
alarm sounded in the resident's
neighborhood. The city dispatched a police
officer to the location. Observing nothing
unusual, the officer left the area, only
to be stopped a couple of blocks later
by a person who informed the officer he
had witnessed someone running from the
area of the car alarm. As the officer
started driving back to the area of the
car alarm, he noticed a person walking
on the sidewalk. The officer asked the
person, a minor, if he had noticed anybody
running from the area. The minor answered
that he had not. While the officer and
another officer were speaking to the minor,
another resident of the neighborhood
arrived in her car and informed the
officers that she had observed two people,
one of whom was heavy set with a blinking
light on his back pocket, walking in the
area of her neighbor's residence. She
observed the heavier-set individual, later
identified as Wills, enter her neighbor's
attached garage through an unlocked service
door. She further observed a smaller
individual standing by a van parked in
the neighbor's driveway.
The officers eventually let the minor leave
even though they found a large amount of
coins, a flashlight, and an electronic
pocket organizer in his pockets. After
releasing the minor, the police officers
drove to the residence where the neighbor
observed the two suspicious people and
woke the owner. The owner, his wife,
and two daughters were in the residence
sleeping at the time. After a search
of his vehicles, the owner discovered
change and an electronic pocket organizer
were missing from the vehicles. The
owner's daughter reported a diamond ring
and some change were missing from her
vehicle. The officers then contacted
the minor's parents, who informed the
officers the minor was with Wills. After
the officers questioned the minor again,
he admitted his involvement in the theft
and implicated Wills in the burglary.
Although Wills denied involvement in the
burglary, the officers arrested him.
The State filed a trial information
charging Wills with second-degree
burglary. The State later amended the
information to include two additional
charges of burglary in the third degree
and using a juvenile to commit an
indictable offense.
The jury returned a verdict finding Wills
guilty of the crimes of burglary in the
second degree, burglary in the third
degree, and using a juvenile to commit
an indictable offense. Wills appeals his
conviction for second-degree burglary
claiming ineffective assistance of
counsel.
II. Scope of Review.
Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel
are derived from the Sixth Amendment of the
United States Constitution. Strickland v.
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 684-86, 104 S.
Ct. 2052, 2063-64, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674, 691-93
(1984). Our review for a claim involving
violations of the Constitution is de novo.
State v. Fintel, 689 N.W.2d 95, 100
(Iowa 2004). We normally preserve
ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims
for postconviction relief actions. State
v. Carter, 602 N.W. 2d 818, 820 (Iowa 1999).
However, we will address such claims on
direct appeal when the record is sufficient
to permit a ruling. State v. Artzer,
609 N.W.2d 526, 531 (Iowa 2000). The
appellate record in the present case is
sufficient to allow us to address Wills'
ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims
on direct appeal.
In order for a defendant to succeed on a
claim of ineffective assistance of counsel,
the defendant must prove: (1) counsel
failed to perform an essential duty and
(2) prejudice resulted. Id. Prejudice
results when "there is a reasonable
probability that, but for the counsel's
unprofessional errors, the result of the
proceeding would have been different."
State v. Hopkins, 576 N.W.2d 374, 378
(Iowa 1998) (quoting Strickland, 466
U.S. at 694, 104 S. Ct. at 2068,
80 L. Ed. 2d at 698). Wills' arguments
also raise issues of statutory
interpretation, which we review for
correction of errors at law. State v.
Wolford Corp., 689 N.W.2d 471, 473 (Iowa 2004).
III. Analysis.
To find Wills guilty of burglary in the
second degree, the State had to prove
Wills perpetrated a burglary "in or
upon an occupied structure in which one
or more persons are present . . . ." Iowa
Code § 713.5(2) (2003) (emphasis added).
In this appeal, Wills first contends his
trial counsel was ineffective for failing
to move for a judgment of acquittal on
the basis there was insufficient evidence
to support a finding that at the time Wills
entered the garage, there were persons
present in or upon the occupied structure.
Wills concedes the garage was an occupied
structure, but argues the living quarters
and the attached garage are separate and
independent occupied structures; therefore,
the jury could not have found there were
people present in the attached garage
at the time of the burglary.
The Code defines an "occupied structure" as:
[A]ny building, structure, appurtenances
to buildings and structures, land, water
or air vehicle, or similar place adapted
for overnight accommodation of persons,
or occupied by persons for the purpose of
carrying on business or other activity
therein, or for the storage or safekeeping
of anything of value. Such a structure
is an "occupied structure" whether or not
a person is actually present.
Id. § 702.12.
Wills relies on State v. Smothers, 590
N.W.2d 721 (Iowa 1999), to argue the
garage and the living quarters are separate
and independent occupied structures. In
Smothers, two separate and distinct
businesses connected by interior fire doors
were operated in the same structure.
590 N.W.2d at 723. We held the defendant
committed two burglaries by entering each
business because "[t]he facility's
construction history and physical make-up
demonstrate that the portions are
independent working units which constitute
'[a] combination of materials to form a
construction for occupancy [or] use.'" Id.
Smothers is not at odds with the present
case because the living quarters and the
garage are not separate or independent
units of the residence.
Our review of the record reveals the garage
in question was a three-car attached garage
separated from the living quarters by a
door. The same roof covered the garage as
the rest of the residence. The living
quarters surrounded the garage on two sides.
It was structurally no different from any
other room in the residence.
The garage was a functional part of the
residence. On the night of the incident,
the door was unlocked. The owner of the
residence used two stalls in the garage to
park the family vehicles. The owner used
the third stall for his motorcycle. As
such, the garage and the living quarters
are a single "structure" or "building"
functioning as an integral part of the
family residence. Thus, the residence
including the garage is a single
"occupied structure" under section 702.12.
See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr.
2d 256 (Ct. App.1995) (holding defendant's
entry into an attached garage constituted
first-degree burglary because the garage
was attached to the house; therefore,
burglary of the garage was burglary of
an inhabited dwelling house); People v.
Cunningham, 637 N.E.2d 1247, 1252 (Ill.
App. Ct. 1994) (holding "ordinarily an
attached garage is a 'dwelling' because
it is part of the structure in which
the owner or occupant lives");
State v. Lara, 587 P.2d 52, 53
(N.M. Ct. App. 1978) (holding "burglary
of the [attached] garage was burglary of
the dwelling house because the garage was
a part of the structure used as living
quarters"); People v. Green, 141 A.D.2d
760, 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988) (holding
"[s]ince the garage in the present case
was structurally part of a building
which was used for overnight lodging of
various persons, it must be considered
as part of a dwelling"); White v. State,
630 S.W. 2d 340, 342 (Tex. Ct. App. 1982)
(holding an attached garage under the
same roof as the home would be considered
a habitation within the purview of the
penal code because the garage is a
structure appurtenant to and connected
to the house); State v. Murbach, 843 P.
2d 551, 553 (Wash. Ct. App 1993)
(holding the definition of a dwelling
under Washington's burglary statute
included an attached garage).
Had Wills' trial counsel moved for a
judgment of acquittal on the basis there
was insufficient evidence to support
a finding that at the time Wills
entered the garage there were no persons
present in or upon the occupied
structure, it would have been overruled
by the court because the owner and his
family were present in the residence at
the time of the burglary.
Wills also claims his counsel was
ineffective for failing to object to
the jury instruction used by the district
court on the same ground; that the
living quarters were a separate and
independent occupied structure from the
attached garage. The instruction as
given stated:
The State must prove all of the following
elements of Burglary in the Second
Degree as to Count I:
1. On or about the 12th day of August,
2003, the defendant or someone he aided
and abetted broke into or entered the
residence at . . . .
2. The residence at . . . was an occupied
structure as defined in Instruction No. 29.
3. The defendant or the person he aided
and abetted did not have permission or
authority to break into the residence at ...
4. The defendant or the person he aided
and abetted did so with the specific
intent to commit a theft therein.
5. During the incident persons were present
in or upon the occupied structure.
If the State has proved all of the elements,
the defendant is guilty of Burglary in the
Second Degree. If the State has failed to prove
any of the elements, the defendant is not
guilty of Burglary in the Second Degree and
you will then consider the charge of
Attempted Burglary in the Second Degree
explained in Instruction No. 21.
(Emphasis added.)
Wills' claim is without merit. As we have
discussed, the residence is the one and
only "occupied structure" under the facts
of this case. Had Wills' trial counsel
made this objection to the instruction,
it would have been overruled.
Therefore, Wills' trial counsel is not
ineffective for failing to move
for a judgment of acquittal or objecting
to the instruction because there was no
legal basis for the motion or objection.
See State v. Hochmuth, 585 N.W.2d 234,
238 (Iowa 1998) (holding trial counsel was
not ineffective for failing to raise an
issue that has no merit).
IV. Disposition.
We affirm the judgment of the district
court because Wills' trial counsel was
not ineffective for failing to raise
meritless issues.
AFFIRMED.
-----------------------------------
[ As Collected March 7, 2009 ]
Filings
Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS
Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK)
Citation Number:
Event Filed By Filed Create Date Last Updated Action Date
ORDER OF DISCHARGE OVROM ELIZA 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 12/16/2008
Comments: FROM PROBATION
OTHER EVENT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 12/16/2008 12/16/2008
12/16/2008
Comments: FIELD DISCHARGE REPORT
OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 12/16/2008
Comments: REVOCATION HEARING SET FOR 1/07/2009 IS CANCELLED
DEFENDANT HAS NOT PAID IN FULL FINANCIAL
OBLIGATIONS
ORDER FOR PROBATION REVOCATION HEARING MOISAN CYNTHIA M 12/05/2008
12/05/2008 12/05/2008
Comments: ON 1/7/09 AT 9:30AM RM204
PROBATION REVOCATION 12/05/2008 12/05/2008 12/05/2008
Comments: REPORT OF VIOLATIONS FILED BY JAN HORNOCKER
FORMAL PROBATION HUTCHISON ROBERT A 01/25/2006 01/26/2006
01/26/2006
Comments: EXTENDED TO 01/16/09 OR UNTIL CONDITIONS ARE MET
COURT ORDERED PAYMENT PLAN 01/13/2006 01/13/2006 01/13/2006
[ ... ]
On Sun, 10 May 2009, Kent Wills <comp...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
>news:WZC9J7IX39944.2237268519@reece.net.au...
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>
>> On Sun, 10 May 2009, Kent Wills <comp...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>"Greegor" <Gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:c9e12046-a98e-42c8...@o20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com...
>>>>G > And a notoriously stupid liar.
>>>>
>>>> KW > Odd that you've been UNABLE to prove even one lie from me.
>>>>
>>>> I'll leave that to others, Kent!
>>>
>>> Odd that no one else has been able.
>>>
>>>> You can thank Dan for the inspiration!
>>>
>>> You give him too much credit. My exposing you for the lying, drug
>>>addled scum you were, are and will be, wasn't influenced by Dan in any
>>>way.
>>
>> I also note that Greg has abandoned his previous assertion, that you and
>> Dan are the same person (message ID
>> <189d5266-1d60-43a6...@w74g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>)
>>
>>
>
> He's taken on a whole knew delusion.
> Less than a month after declaring I'm in Louisiana, he's back to
>claiming I'm in Arkansas. However, in spite of his previous claim that he
>found me listed in the Little Rock phone book (which, according to Greg
>PROVES I live in Little Rock), Greg is claiming I'm in Rogers, Arkansas.
>This makes me wonder why he lied and claimed I live in Little Rock (since
>he's not claimed it was an error, it was an intentional act of deception on
>his part).
> Of course, he's offered NOTHING in the way of proof. Since this is yet
>another of his MANY pathological lies, he can't.
> On the plus side, if Greg names every possible town/city in the U.S.,
>he will eventually get it right. It's just a shame his body will give out
>long before he's able to guess it.
Reminds me of Ken's antics. A few years back, within a 60-day time period,
he claimed that I'd moved from the west suburbs of Chicago, to Missouri,
then back to Chicago, then to Kentucky, then to Ohio, then back to Chicago
(by way of Missouri again.) In this same time frame, I also had my middle
name legally changed twice....with the changes retroactively applied at
least once to my military discharge paperwork.
Regarding the phone book thing, several of the online "white pages"-type
directories allow one to upload information about themselves, without
checking to know if it's accurate. I confess that I did do this on one
occasion, just to watch Ken gobble up the bread crumbs. Oh, and although
it looks like he's now trying to claim that I live in Michigan or in
Buffalo, New York, he has yet to name the state in which I live.
iQA/AwUBSgdwEijl4QPoqs6fEQJAxgCg+vWmMYdAoueYE4wghoq0DYLPrD8Anjl+
vOcZCztQuZdil40hkvDV7WC7
=XKRF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Davey have you been noticing lately that your "luck" has been a bit
shitty???? Just a small "heads up." Ever hear of "Santeria?" I have been
told you have REALLY pissed some folks off BIG time and a little "curse" has
been put on your ass. I know, it and its voo doo roots are "superstition"
right Davy? But somehow bad things seem to happen to people targeted.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santer%C3%ADa
"Santer�a is a syncretic religion of Caribbean origin. Also known as Regla
de Ocha, La Regla Lucumi, or Lukumi.[1][2] From Spanish meaning "one who
'has', 'makes' or 'works' the spirit".[3] The priests are known as
Babaolorishas, "fathers of orisha", and priestesses as Iyalorishas, "mothers
of orisha", and serve as the junior Ile or second in the hierarchical
religious structure."
http://cuban-exile.com/doc_326-350/doc0337.html
"Santeria is a religion popular among Hispanics in general and
Cuban-Americans in particular. Like other Afro-Caribbean cults practiced in
Miami, such as Haitian Voodoo, Obeah and Brazilian Candomble, it blends
African religion with some aspects of Christianity. The Spanish, French and
Portuguese introduced African slaves to Christianity and, partly as a
compromise to ensure cultural survival, the slaves depicted the various
African deities with facsimiles of Roman Catholic saints (a phenomenon known
as syncretism). The gods and goddesses of Santeria are of West African
origin, specifically of the Yoruba culture of southwestern Nigeria. "
http://w3.iac.net/~moonweb/Santeria/Chapter12.html#Curse
To curse a enemy:
Ingredients:
Linseed oil
Almond
oil Cooking oil
Balsam
Ashes
Three peppercorns
Write the name of your enemy on a piece of paper. Place the paper at the
bottom of a clay pot. Cover the paper with nine pinches of ashes, the
peppercorns and the balsam. Pour in equal parts of the oils and insert nine
wicks.
At midnight, petition Oya to destroy your enemy as you light the lamp. Do
this nine nights in a row. Seen any burned candles in your area lately?
------
From what I am told - you are in DEEP SHIT, Davey!
Keywords: david daniel moore pathological liar, david daniel moore
calumet city, illinois, david daniel moore internet psychopath,
david daniel moore stalker, stalker, real estate agents, david daniel moore
pathological liar, david daniel moore, pervert, abusive real estate agents,
david daniel moore coward, david daniel moore computer hacker,
david daniel moore criminal, internet stalkers david daniel moore,
internet harassment david daniel moore, david daniel moore
internet libel, david daniel moore website of lies,janet moore,
850 buffalo avenue, calumet city,illinos, dui, linda boss, ACT, Lotus,
david daniel moore malicious use of employers computers,
david daniel moore sara lee corporation, never employ david
daniel moore, internet psychopaths, david daniel moore, david kojack, moore,
chicagoland pansies, internet addiction, internet stalking, woman hater,
tara moreland, janet more, dawn moore, alias dustin calloway, alias
david miller, alias david boss, alias jeff johnson, blackmailer, sexual
harassment,sexual blackmail, david moore bbs blackmail, david moore usmc, 29
palms california,linda boss, david moore child abuser, anonymous remailer
stalkers, anonymous remailer abusers, basement dwellers,off shore website,
new zealand, malaysia website,employer hotel/casino,computer abuse, office
disruption,
obsessive compulsive disorder, four winds,calumet city drag queen,
transvestite,
sexual disorders, mglf, milwaukee general liberation front,punks, putz,
cowardice, forger, mommys basement, skinheads, forgeries, willian rainey
harper college,
coalition forces, buffalo, michigan, david moore coalition supreme allied
commander,
anonymous remailer stalkers, david moore womanizer, david daniel moore drag
queen,
lotus programs, IT contractors, david d. moore aryan nations member.
Wills Family Trust
Wills Revokable Trust
Rogers Arkansas
This from a guy who doesn't know what Wicca or Paganism is and claims
Paganism died out 1, 500 years ago. And now he wants to claim
Santeria?
Gee Kennie, did you go to someone who claimed to be in Santeria to
put something on Sullivan? Is that what you are saying, or just doing
your usual bullshit act?
(( laughing))
> I have been
> told you have REALLY pissed some folks off BIG time and a little "curse" has
> been put on your ass. I know, it and its voo doo roots are "superstition"
> right Davy?
Voodoo is one word Kennie. And Santeria is different than Voodoo.
How childish of you to claim Sullivan has been "cursed"
Tell me Kennie, what does the Bible say about going to the "occult"
for " curses", Catholic Boy?
And Kennie, curses can be sent back to the sender.
> But somehow bad things seem to happen to people targeted.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santer%C3%ADa
>
> "Santería is a syncretic religion of Caribbean origin. Also known as Regla
So you looked up a " recipe" to curse someone.
Go ahead Kennie, Do it. Call up Oya and whomever you want. But be
prepared to pay the price Kennie.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
MOE> This from a guy who doesn't know what Wicca or Paganism is and claims
MOE> Paganism died out 1, 500 years ago. And now he wants to claim
MOE> Santeria?
Paganism as practiced in Europe gave out BEFORE the Romans occupied
Europe. Claim Santeria??????????
MOE> Gee Kennie, did you go to someone who claimed to be in Santeria to
MOE> put something on Sullivan? Is that what you are saying, or just doing
MOE> your usual bullshit act?
You can't read for SHIT, Maureen. REALLY you are a RETARD. I was
speaking to DAVID MOORE you TWIT! No - I didn't "GO TO" anyone. Moore has
been "fukkking with" some people who are INTO Santeria. He is reaping what
he is sewing. *I* didn't have to do anything. *I* have been SILENT on the
issue but Moore thinks he can FUKKK-OVER anyone he wants and there will
never be any consequences. That he's "SUPERMAN!" Davey's problem is he has
been harassing some people that have had their FILL of the little prick. So
now they have placed a "curse" or "hex" or whatever they call it on him. Do
I believe in that stuff? Not really, but I don't "disbelieve" either, just
like I don't really "disbelieve" in Wicca. Neither is my "thing." Just let
me say I have observed that people who have drawn the negative attention of
Santeria high priests have experience period of REALLY BAD LUCK!
Moore you are an IDIOT. 90% of the folks can't see your SHIT.
What are ya gonna do NOW, Danny? Find some other site???????? REALLY?
GOOGLE DANNY GOOGLE. Remember the ENTIRE WOLD is counting on you to be on
constant PATROL!
I am sure you'll find some other ant-hill to TRY to make a mountain range of
it. You are so FAR into OCD you couldn't stop yourself to save your life
LOSER!!!!
POOR Davey doesn't know that 90% of the newsreaders CANNOT see the photo he
keeps TRYING to post. POOR STUPID POLACK!
On Tue, 12 May 2009, krp <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
>DAVID MOORE - WORLD CLASS IT CONSULTANT
>"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
>news:DMN7RTAI3994...@reece.net.au...
>> -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
>> Version: N/A
>>
>> iQA/AwUBSgmxrCjl4QPoqs6fEQIUtQCgz8FMer774HlLsClHeMkst8DXRE4AoMPg
>> 7fxukjtGzS6ydCFD7m4kbRY6rR4ndAo2T0hMUDQudG1qbAAAAE9uIFR1ZSwgMTIg
>> TWF5IDIwMDksIHdoaXRldmFtcCA8ZnZybml0ZUB5YWhvby5jb20+IHdyb3RlOg0K
>
>POOR Davey doesn't know that 90% of the newsreaders CANNOT see the photo he
>keeps TRYING to post.
I'm not trying to post a photo. Speaking of which, how did you like the
one I e-mailed you?
>POOR STUPID POLACK!
I'm not Polish, dumbass. But thanks for demonstrating your bigotry.
iQA/AwUBSgncrCjl4QPoqs6fEQLMhQCgiaVGTiRB1NOsJfTLi6tJPdYBUr4AnRqd
YI5Z69SUEehwIte8yaBajQCZ
=qEpg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Pretty SICK sending unwanted PORN by e-mail. Of course you used a
tghrow-away gmail account. Davey - as I relied to you, what SHIT you must
have had for parents to raise a creep like you, a chip off the old block, eh
Davey? Think your mother would be PROUD of what her son is doing? Either one
of them.
You revising once again your claims Kennie? You never clarified your
claim to Europe only until now-- after I showed your claim to be
bullshit and full of ignorance.
BTW even if you limit your claim to Europe you still would be wrong.
>
> MOE> Gee Kennie, did you go to someone who claimed to be in Santeria to
> MOE> put something on Sullivan? Is that what you are saying, or just doing
> MOE> your usual bullshit act?
>
> You can't read for SHIT, Maureen. REALLY you are a RETARD.
For a "retard" I seem to have exposed a number of your LIES , Kennie.
> I was
> speaking to DAVID MOORE you TWIT! No - I didn't "GO TO" anyone. Moore has
> been "fukkking with" some people who are INTO Santeria. He is reaping what
> he is sewing.
Would that be embroidery or quilting Kennie? Is Moore now irunning a
sewing circle?
BTW Kennie, your illiteracy is showing. It's SOWING, dumbass.
As for Moore supposedly "fukkkking" with those in Santeria, I highly
doubt it. Most Santeria practitioners in the States are in Florida--
where you live. And why would someone in Santeria tell YOU what they
supposedly did to Moore,, if anything?
You're doing your bullshit act again Kennie.
>*I* didn't have to do anything. *I* have been SILENT on the
> issue but Moore thinks he can FUKKK-OVER anyone he wants and there will
> never be any consequences. That he's "SUPERMAN!" Davey's problem is he has
> been harassing some people that have had their FILL of the little prick. So
> now they have placed a "curse" or "hex" or whatever they call it on him.
Oh REALLY? And you believe in hexes and curses Kennie?
(( ROTFLMAO))
" Course that COULD explain your shitty life....
> Do
> I believe in that stuff? Not really,
Then why mention it Fukkk-boy?
>but I don't "disbelieve" either, just
> like I don't really "disbelieve" in Wicca. Neither is my "thing." Just let
> me say I have observed that people who have drawn the negative attention of
> Santeria high priests have experience period of REALLY BAD LUCK!
Yeah right. And you hang around Santeria " High priests"right Kennie?
Bullshit.
You didn't even frigging know Voodoo is different from Santeria, you
posturing asshole.
You were doing an act little man. And I caught you at it.
You don't think assholes like you never have threatened to put curses
on people online Kennie? Your bullshit about Santeria high priests
being mad at Moore is so obviously another of your MANY lies.
You're HOW old and you try this dumbass tactic?
MOE> As for Moore supposedly "fukkkking" with those in Santeria, I highly
MOE> doubt it. Most Santeria practitioners in the States are in Florida--
MOE> where you live. And why would someone in Santeria tell YOU what they
MOE> supposedly did to Moore,, if anything?
Hey TWAT - did you look at all the people he names (HARASSES) with his
KEYWORD LIST??? And you are TOTALLY FULL OF SHIT when you claim that Most of
the folks into Santeria are in FLORIDA. MANY are in New Jersey, lots in
Kentucky, New York and other places. Your IGNORANCE is showing again
Maureen. Are you really so STUPID, More, that you think that people that
Moore has declared to be his "MARKS" on his KEYWORD list wouldn't find out
what the little prick is doing and perhaps contact me about it? I got asked
my opinion, and I suggested that if they were annoyed to "GO FOR IT!" I was
told they would.
KRP > Hey TWAT - did you look at all the people he
KRP > names (HARASSES) with his KEYWORD
KRP > LIST??? And you are TOTALLY FULL OF
KRP > SHIT when you claim that Most of the
KRP > folks into Santeria are in FLORIDA. MANY
KRP > are in New Jersey, lots in Kentucky, New
KRP > York and other places. Your IGNORANCE
KRP > is showing again Maureen. Are you really
KRP > so STUPID, More, that you think that
KRP > people that Moore has declared to be his
KRP > "MARKS" on his KEYWORD list wouldn't
KRP > find out what the little prick is doing and
KRP > perhaps contact me about it? I got asked
KRP > my opinion, and I suggested that if they
KRP > were annoyed to "GO FOR IT!" I was
KRP > told they would.
Dave's key word list is biting him in his own Kharmic ass?
Fabulous! Fire up your Ouija board Dave!
Yes as a female I have female genitalia a " twat" to use your
vulgarity. Why do you use that as a hate word Kennie?
>- did you look at all the people he names (HARASSES) with his
> KEYWORD LIST???
As opposed to your "keyword list"Kennie? You should be familiar
enough with Cuban culture to know the names in the list are general
names and not names of specific people as Cubans and some other
Hispanics use three or four names for a full name.
>And you are TOTALLY FULL OF SHIT when you claim that Most of
> the folks into Santeria are in FLORIDA. MANY are in New Jersey, lots in
> Kentucky, New York and other places. Your IGNORANCE is showing again
> Maureen.
The point is you were the one who mentioned Santeria Kennie, And you
live in Florida which has a heavy Cuban population, I never said they
didn't live anywhere else. You were the one who tried claiming Moore
has a " curse" on him when you are the one most likely to seek out
someone in Santeria to put said " curse" on him. Or at least you
PRETEND this shit to try to scare Moore ( whom probably is laughing at
this shit like I am).
Are you so pathetically desperate Kennie that you try this act? I
mean, really now. You DO know that such beings like Oya are not
spirits you should fuck around with don't you?
But hey, do that ritual you gleefully looked up. See what happens
Kennie.
>Are you really so STUPID, More,
More? More what?
> that you think that people that
> Moore has declared to be his "MARKS" on his KEYWORD list wouldn't find out
> what the little prick
There's that genitalia obsession of yours again.
I explained why the " marks" are too general for your LIE of claiming
it is about specific individuals who are upset at Moore. But hey, if
you want to keep trying to cover your fat ass and hide why you posted
that shit in the first place, be my guest and claim whatever crap you
want.
Not that anyone but your doggie greg believe you....
> is doing and perhaps contact me about it?
Now why would they contact YOU when the words in Moore's Keywords
list apply specifically to you and to no one else?
So all the Hesuses and Carlos and whatever contacted you and claimed
they put Santeria curses on Moore? Yeah, right......
Tell the truth for once Kennie. You brought the Santeria shit up to
do some game threat act on Moore. It stinks of the type of crap you
would pull.
> I got asked
> my opinion, and I suggested that if they were annoyed to "GO FOR IT!" I was
> told they would.
Then the kamrma would be on you Kennie.
BTW why would a Santeria or Cuban ask for your PERMISSION ( a Gringo)
to " go for it" ?
Kennie you are lying again.
Its KARMA, not " kharma" Greg. Do try to spell better than your
fucked up master.
>
> Fabulous! Fire up your Ouija board Dave!
The point in this posturing shit that Kennie is doing is that he's
claiming that Moore's keywords are angering some people in Santeria so
( Kennie claims) Moore now has a curse on him by some Santeria " high
priests". Aside from the big bullshit factor that is heavy in all of
Kennie Pangborn's posts, Kennie has one really big error in this
claim. Hispanics use more than one name for their full name. Moore's
keywords are too general and too vague to mean any specific Hispanic
person.
By that " logic" than anyone named David Moore should be pissed off
at Pangborn and Greg, and all David Moores in America are " marks".
So greg are you so sure of yourself and in your master Ken that
you join in Kennie's comment that the Santeria folks " go for it"? Are
you willing to join Kennie in his karmic tar pit? Not that you aren't
already covered in bad karma as it is.
Or is that just your bad hygene?
Are you with Kennie on this? Make some definitive statement Greggie.
How DOES a list of very common Hispanic names make them "marks"? And
marks for WHAT?
Got any thoughts to share with us about stalking Greg, since you and
Kennie do that a lot? Is that what you mean by " marks"?
Have you finished trying to stalk me online Greg? How was my piano
performance, BTW? Was my funeral well attended? Did you join my
Twitter and my FaceBook friends lists?
How IS that stalking of me going along Greggie?
So you're into ass biting greg? Is that why you are so attracted to
Kennie his huge ass?
I figured that Kennie, being homosexual,would be into biting balls
or sucking them, but you as an ass biter?
Hey, two consenting sexual pervert males doing each other is not my
thing. I'm happily straight.
Mmm Mmm Mmm Tom my dear you are looking GREAT today!!!
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
>
It's a bit like when Kent lifted quotes from
that other Greg Hanson and tried to
pretend they were my comments.
(Reposting it THOUSANDS of times.)
Did you think that was going to end well?
> Got any thoughts to share with us about stalking Greg, since you and
> Kennie do that a lot? Is that what you mean by " marks"?
"Marks" is Dave Moore's own actual language.
You know, your buddy Anonymous Dave Moore?
The one who runs a hate site?
> Have you finished trying to stalk me online Greg? How was my piano
> performance, BTW? Was my funeral well attended? Did you join my
> Twitter and my FaceBook friends lists?
Moe > How IS that stalking of me going along Greggie?
You mean posting your name?
LOL
Moe > So you're into ass biting greg?
Isn't that Marv Albert?
Moe > Is that why you are so attracted
Moe > to Kennie his huge ass?
Your enemies are all conspiring against you.
Moe > I figured that Kennie, being homosexual,would
Moe > be into biting balls or sucking them, but you
Moe > as an ass biter?
The diaper comments worked better.
Moe > Hey, two consenting sexual pervert males
Moe > doing each other is not my thing. I'm happily straight.
Practicing straight or wishful thinking straight?
Moe > Mmm Mmm Mmm Tom my dear you are looking GREAT today!!!
I've seen water buffalo mating before.
Avoidance of the question noted.
>
> Did you think that was going to end well?
You post repeatedly ( obsessively so) about Kent's alleged criminal
convictions and you bitch about him showing some of your criminal
past Greg?
That's your hypocrisy showing.
>
> > Got any thoughts to share with us about stalking Greg, since you and
> > Kennie do that a lot? Is that what you mean by " marks"?
>
> "Marks" is Dave Moore's own actual language.
> You know, your buddy Anonymous Dave Moore?
> The one who runs a hate site?
Its not a hate site. Moore uses Kennies own words to show what kind
of bastard Kennie actually is.
BTW I do not know Moore personally.
>
> > Have you finished trying to stalk me online Greg? How was my piano
> > performance, BTW? Was my funeral well attended? Did you join my
> > Twitter and my FaceBook friends lists?
>
> Moe > How IS that stalking of me going along Greggie?
>
> You mean posting your name?
> LOL
That's as far as you got Greggie?
Man you suck when stalking someone with a common name.
>
> Moe > So you're into ass biting greg?
>
> Isn't that Marv Albert?
Jacking off to Marv Albert greg? I thought you were into preubescent
girls.
>
> Moe > Is that why you are so attracted
> Moe > to Kennie his huge ass?
>
> Your enemies are all conspiring against you.
If you two are my " enemies" I need to get more competent
adversaries.
>
> Moe > I figured that Kennie, being homosexual,would
> Moe > be into biting balls or sucking them, but you
> Moe > as an ass biter?
>
> The diaper comments worked better.
So you admit you diaper nosh?
>
> Moe > Hey, two consenting sexual pervert males
> Moe > doing each other is not my thing. I'm happily straight.
>
> Practicing straight or wishful thinking straight?
Actual straight female. I like the certain male body and have a BF.
>
> Moe > Mmm Mmm Mmm Tom my dear you are looking GREAT today!!!
>
> I've seen water buffalo mating before.
Your sexual interests are sadly uninteresting.
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Greegor <Gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> How DOES a list of very common Hispanic names
>> make them "marks"? And marks for WHAT?
>
>It's a bit like when Kent lifted quotes from
>that other Greg Hanson and tried to
>pretend they were my comments.
>(Reposting it THOUSANDS of times.)
Which was no different than you "lifting" the news listing, and the court
docket, of the other Dave Moore and trying to pretend that it referred to
me. Reposting it thousands of times....even after you knew that his
charges were dismissed.
>
>Did you think that was going to end well?
>
>> Got any thoughts to share with us about stalking Greg, since you and
>> Kennie do that a lot? Is that what you mean by " marks"?
>
>"Marks" is Dave Moore's own actual language.
>You know, your buddy Anonymous Dave Moore?
>The one who runs a hate site?
There's nobody here who goes by the name "Anonymous Dave Moore." There are
two people whom I know of named "Dave Moore" who post here....one of whom
made a single post.
Note that I didn't count Ken, who once claimed his name was David Moore.
Are you perhaps referring to him? If so, be advised that all available
data says that his legal name is Kenneth Robert Pangborn.
iQA/AwUBSgqksCjl4QPoqs6fEQL9IwCg2wGzfA2kblstVOyNNwqbTIJvlT4AnRVV
n6oC0ITdJPu0q2AchxIxflL6
=5yOJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
GH> Dave's key word list is biting him in his own Kharmic ass?
Moore believe he has some sort of "ENTITLEMENT" to harass people in
order to BLACKMAIL ME. He sees it as his "FREEDOM OF SPEECH." Some divine
right to harass the people so that I will bow to his will. It hasn't worked
for a decade of his obsession, but he REALLY beliueves it will someday. He
seems to get away with a great deal. He believes the world is AFRAID of him.
Don't use a big word like Kharma to him. He doesn't know what it means. He
doesn't understand that eventually what he sends around WILL come back to
him.
Yes as a female I have female genitalia a " twat" to use your
vulgarity. Why do you use that as a hate word Kennie?
>- did you look at all the people he names (HARASSES) with his
> KEYWORD LIST???
MOE> As opposed to your "keyword list"Kennie?
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! POOR POOR PORR DAVID MOORE.
POORF PICKED ON DAVID MOORE. Waaaahhhhhhhh! Tell MOMMY. He has had his
KEYWORD LIST now for 10 years. I put one up for a month and you two are
CRYING like BABIES. POOR POOR POOR POOR DAVEY MOORE! POOR INNOCENT BAYHBEE!
MOE> You should be familia enough with Cuban culture to know the names in
the list are general
MOE> names and not names of specific people as Cubans and some other
MOE> Hispanics use three or four names for a full name.
Maureen it is BAD ENOUGH that you TRY to be a MILITARY EXPERT - but
PLEASE Miss Whitebread do NOT even TRY to give me your EXPERT OPINION on
Spanish culture or the names that people use. You display your STUPIDITY for
the world to see. IN CUBA - on legal forms people use their first name,
their middle name and then the family name of their father and then their
mother.
your BUDDY Moore has staggered all over gthe block like a drunken Marine on
that with his racism. No secret since he has our marriage certificate
(PUBLIC RECORD) on his STALKING WEBSITE.
My wife's maiden name was Barbara Mercedes Blanco-Sanciprian. EL-DUUMBASS
constantly called her Barbara Sanciprian. For most purposes in Cuba she was
called Barbara Blanco. MOST Cuban Americans take the traditional patrilineal
family name. In other words if she were a single woman here it would be the
same as in Cuba, Barbara Blanco. (Oh and BEFORE you TRY to impress us with
hyour BULLSHIT expertise - Blanco is WHITE) So in English her name would be
Barbara White. But I am sure that YOU, posturing as an EXPERT will tell ujs
all YOU think you know to PROVE you know more than I do. The people on the
list of your BUDDY Moore, are CUBAN AMERICANS who are not using their dual
family names.
>And you are TOTALLY FULL OF SHIT when you claim that Most of
> the folks into Santeria are in FLORIDA. MANY are in New Jersey, lots in
> Kentucky, New York and other places. Your IGNORANCE is showing again
> Maureen.
MOE> The point is you were the one who mentioned Santeria Kennie, And you
MOE> live in Florida which has a heavy Cuban population, I never said they
MOE> didn't live anywhere else. You were the one who tried claiming Moore
MOE> has a " curse" on him when you are the one most likely to seek out
MOE> someone in Santeria to put said " curse" on him. Or at least you
MOE> PRETEND this shit to try to scare Moore ( whom probably is laughing at
MOE> this shit like I am).
I forgot that YOU are an EXPERFT on Cubans and Sateria! Not just ANY
EXPERT but the world's MOST prominent EXPERT. I didn't "CLAIM" anything. I
mentioned that some of the people on your PAL Davey's LIST contacted me and
told med what they had in mind your your INFANT friend. Tell uis ALL of your
EXPERT opinions on the Cuban population In America and your INTIMATE
EXPERTISE about Cuba. I bet your daddy had 200 missions over Cuba in the
Cuban -American WAR.
MOE> You DO know that such beings like Oya are not spirits you should fuck
around with don't you?
Tell that to your buddy, Moore!
MOE> Now why would they contact YOU when the words in Moore's Keywords
MOE> list apply specifically to you and to no one else?
Moe tell me do you think everyone is AS stupid as YOU ARE? You don't
think they could TRACE WHO is putting their names on his little LIST of
"MARKS" and why??? Do you think everyone sits around drooling like YOU DO?
MOE> So all the Hesuses and Carlos and whatever contacted you and claimed
MOE> they put Santeria curses on Moore? Yeah, right......
Clever Moe, but your BUDDY, Moore gave LAST NAMES as well.
MOE> BTW why would a Santeria or Cuban ask for your PERMISSION ( a Gringo)
MOE> to " go for it" ?
Did I say "PERMISSION?" I said they asked me what I "thought" I said it
was up to them, but for my part; "GO FOR IT!"
MOE> The point in this posturing shit that Kennie is doing is that he's
MOE> claiming that Moore's keywords are angering some people in Santeria so
MOE> ( Kennie claims) Moore now has a curse on him by some Santeria " high
MOE> priests".
Moe your stupidity is showing again. I said he has pissed off some folks
who ALSO happen to be into Santeria. They don't appreciate Davey's
HARASSMENT, of them or a fellow Cujban-American (my wife). So it is time for
a little payback.
MOE> Kennie has one really big error in this claim. Hispanics use more than
one name for their full name. Moore's
MOE> keywords are too general and too vague to mean any specific Hispanic
MOE> person.
There's the old Moe arrogance rearing it's UGLY head again. MOST Cubans
do NOT use the hypenated last names in the U.S.. Even IN Cuba - the use of
the paternal and materal names is for FORMAL things. But please continue
adding to the list of subjects on which you CLAIM to be EXPERT. God you SO
remind me of Stacy Alexander and how she would become an INSTANT EXPERT on
ANY subject under discussion. Which is why we started making fun of her as
"Search Engine Suzy." Your IGNORANCE about Cuba is underwhelming Moe as is
your PRETENSE with things military.
Avoidance of the question noted.
>
> Did you think that was going to end well?
You post repeatedly ( obsessively so) about Kent's alleged criminal
convictions and you bitch about him showing some of your criminal
past Greg?
That's your hypocrisy showing.
>
> > Got any thoughts to share with us about stalking Greg, since you and
> > Kennie do that a lot? Is that what you mean by " marks"?
>
> "Marks" is Dave Moore's own actual language.
> You know, your buddy Anonymous Dave Moore?
> The one who runs a hate site?
MOE> Its not a hate site. Moore uses Kennies own words to show what kind
MOE> of bastard Kennie actually is.
Small problem Moe - a good part of what your BUDDY has on his site is
FABRICATED (made up) by him. What isn't falsified whole cloth is ALTERED,
and ALL if it is MISREPRESENTED and OUT OF CONTEXT.
As usual DAVID MOORE posts gibberish!
I put a spell on you!
CCR
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4R6nmKjcSeU
Nina Simone
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORSzfw8FE-o
Moore REALLY believes that he is IMMUNE from the laws of Karma AND those of
man! He lives in his own little bubble. But whenever he doesn't get his was
he SCREAMS like a baby who just threw his rattle out of his crib! He has
pissed off some people that I would not want angry with me. Do I believe in
all that voo doo crap? Not so much. But I tend to give the occult a wide
berth. My biggest tussles have been with some folks who claim they are
"witches." They don't read their own literature that warns them against
sending our negative crap. It comes BACK to them ten-fold.
Its KARMA, dungboy. As for what you do comes back to you, YOU should
be concerned about that, hypocrite.
Greg is obsessed with Kent Wills. You are obsessed with Dan Sullivan
and David Moore. Neither of you are a credit to society.
I never claimed to be an expert Kennie, but I sure exposed some of
your lies about what you claimed you were while in the AF.
Your credibility, such as it is, is low if not nonexistent. I showed
how wrong you were about Paganism. Your claims about those ins
Santeria being angry enough at Moore to put a curse on him is
laughable.
Posture and bullshit all you want Kennie. The only reason why someone
in Santeria would put a curse on Moore is by your request-- and
payment.
> - but
> PLEASE Miss Whitebread do NOT even TRY to give me your EXPERT OPINION on
> Spanish culture or the names that people use. You display your STUPIDITY for
> the world to see. IN CUBA - on legal forms people use their first name,
> their middle name and then the family name of their father and then their
> mother.
> your BUDDY Moore has staggered all over gthe block like a drunken Marine on
> that with his racism.
I see no racism from Moore, I have seen, however misogyny from you.
> No secret since he has our marriage certificate
> (PUBLIC RECORD) on his STALKING WEBSITE.
You've had ample opportunity to show that what on his website is
incorrect. His current web site www.aboutkenpangborn.com has been up
for more than a year. Moore has even said that if you can prove your
claim that what is on that web site is lies that he would hand the
ownership of the web iste to you.
You have claimed what is on there is altered or taken out of context,
misrepresented and falsified, and yet you haven't proven what these
alleged errors are. You could have proven your case by quoting form
the web site where he shows your words and post what your actual words
were and provide the means to verify your claims of your actual words.
Links where your actual words are archived and even the use of the
wayback machine to verify your accusations.
And yet you haven't done so just do the noise of claiming its lies
and so forth.
The simple truth is that the links to what you HAVE said are used by
Moore and others as proof of what a lying misogynist you actually are.
Your misogyny to me is just a more recent example.
That is why you can't support your claims of lies and distortions by
showing what you actually posted. Because your won words prove what a
lying, lowlife scum you actually are.
What Moore has on his web site www.aboutkenpangborn.com is actually
TAME compared to what you seem to be doing on an almost daily basis. I
wouldn't have needed to look at his web site to know your misogyny,
your habitual lying and your obsessive, often childish behavior. But
what he has supports my observations about you.
> My wife's maiden name was Barbara Mercedes Blanco-Sanciprian. EL-DUUMBASS
> constantly called her Barbara Sanciprian. For most purposes in Cuba she was
> called Barbara Blanco. MOST Cuban Americans take the traditional patrilineal
> family name. In other words if she were a single woman here it would be the
> same as in Cuba, Barbara Blanco. (Oh and BEFORE you TRY to impress us with
> hyour BULLSHIT expertise - Blanco is WHITE) So in English her name would be
> Barbara White. But I am sure that YOU, posturing as an EXPERT will tell ujs
> all YOU think you know to PROVE you know more than I do. The people on the
> list of your BUDDY Moore, are CUBAN AMERICANS who are not using their dual
> family names.
The fact is that in Hispanic society one has more than one " last
name" makes your claim that Moore identified specific people as a
joke.
Worse still you claim these specific people are so upset at Moore
that they contacted YOU, a whitey, for permission to curse Moore.
Didn't you claim some time ago that you DIDN'T know the people named?
Now they are suddenly your confidants in their intent to curse Moore,
so much so that you can tell them confidentailly to " go for it".
Bullshit.
Cuban naming traditions from http://www.johncooke.com/name/hispanic.htm
############################
"The child's second name is also chosen by the family. In Cuba, El
Salvador and Panama, the second name is usually a baptismal name and
may be chosen to honor a grandparent. For boys or girls, it may be the
grandfather's name with the addition of a diminutive ending.
The child's third and fourth names are the last names of the mother
and father. The order of these names depends on the culture. In Cuba,
Mexico, Panama and Uruguay, the father's name is placed in the third
position and the mother's name in the fourth position."
################################
When you are going to lie, do yourself a favor and don't look so
stupid by your lack of information, 1910 " expert"
>
> >And you are TOTALLY FULL OF SHIT when you claim that Most of
> > the folks into Santeria are in FLORIDA. MANY are in New Jersey, lots in
> > Kentucky, New York and other places. Your IGNORANCE is showing again
> > Maureen.
So your Santeria buddies are new Yorkers Kennie??
(( laughing))
Santeria is Cuban oriented. Florida has a large Cuban population. I
never said practitioners of Santeria were not anywhere else in the
USA.
Be that as it may, you have a considerable credibility problem in
claiming these Santeria " high priests" put a curse on Moore when your
claim for it is flimsy at best. You are the one with the motive to
have a curse placed on Moore and you have the habit of excusing your
motives and encasing your announcements in loads of garbage. The
upset Cubans excuse is your cowardly way of avoiding admitting your
obsession about Moore is so bad you will do anything to stop him, one
way or another-- as long as you aren't criminally prosecuted.
>
> MOE> The point is you were the one who mentioned Santeria Kennie, And you
> MOE> live in Florida which has a heavy Cuban population, I never said they
> MOE> didn't live anywhere else. You were the one who tried claiming Moore
> MOE> has a " curse" on him when you are the one most likely to seek out
> MOE> someone in Santeria to put said " curse" on him. Or at least you
> MOE> PRETEND this shit to try to scare Moore ( whom probably is laughing at
> MOE> this shit like I am).
>
> I forgot that YOU are an EXPERFT on Cubans and Sateria!
I never said I was. But I know where your " curse on Moore" claim
actually comes from-- your wishes. You are the one with the motive to
want to go to a Santeria priest to get a curse put on Moore. You are
the one who was in glee at the idea that supposedly some Cubas were
so upset at Moore that they asked your permission to go ahead and
curse Moore. As if they were not adults in their own rights who can
decide fro themselves.
> Not just ANY
> EXPERT but the world's MOST prominent EXPERT. I didn't "CLAIM" anything. I
> mentioned that some of the people on your PAL Davey's LIST contacted me and
> told med what they had in mind your your INFANT friend. Tell uis ALL of your
> EXPERT opinions on the Cuban population In America and your INTIMATE
> EXPERTISE about Cuba. I bet your daddy had 200 missions over Cuba in the
> Cuban -American WAR.
Lie all you want Kennie. I can see its a compulsion with you. You are
lying about me in yet another one of your many hissy fits, once again
smashing whatever little credibility you might have had in this.
What orisha was used in the curse Kennie?
BTW Kennie you DO know that one shouldn't mess with certain higher
powers, don't you? You try to misuse or deceive it tends to be found
out and said beings would be angry with you.
Its like in Hawaii where people try not to offend Madam Pele.
Taking your petty little games about Moore to a higher power, said
power might be pissed off at YOU.
>
> MOE> You DO know that such beings like Oya are not spirits you should fuck
> around with don't you?
>
> Tell that to your buddy, Moore!
You should heed the warnings Kennie, since you are the one trying to
MISuse them.
And frankly if you do hire a Santeria practitioner to do the curse or
even be stupid enough to do the curse yourself, you deserve what comes
your way.
You know, Karma.
>
> MOE> Now why would they contact YOU when the words in Moore's Keywords
> MOE> list apply specifically to you and to no one else?
>
> Moe tell me do you think everyone is AS stupid as YOU ARE?
You used to have plenty of suckers to rip off.
> You don't
> think they could TRACE WHO is putting their names on his little LIST of
> "MARKS" and why??? Do you think everyone sits around drooling like YOU DO?
Projection noted.
>
> MOE> So all the Hesuses and Carlos and whatever contacted you and claimed
> MOE> they put Santeria curses on Moore? Yeah, right......
>
> Clever Moe, but your BUDDY, Moore gave LAST NAMES as well.
Not complete last names Kennie.
Your claim falls flat upon actual examination.
Since something like a curse, particularly in Santeria is a heavy,
serious thing, why would some vague incomplete names supposedly "
marking" people in a, to be honest, obscure web activity, be so grave
that supposedly these people are angry enough to seek you out and ask
your permission ( as if they were children) to curse Moore?
It simply doesn't make sense.
But it is a cover for what YOU would do, Kennie, so you can hide like
the coward you are.
What you do and are responsible for comes back to you Kennie. No
matter how hard you try to hide.
Grow up Kennie
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
>
Were they children Kennie? Why should they ask for your permission of
they wished to curse Moore themselves?
BTW Kennie, I do hope you try to do the " curse" yourself. Your
energy of hating Moore would make the " curse" more effective.
On WHOM, however, the curse would land, now that would be
interesting.....
And YOU aren't?
>He lives in his own little bubble. But whenever he doesn't get his was
> he SCREAMS like a baby who just threw his rattle out of his crib!
Oh you mean like YOU do?
> He has
> pissed off some people that I would not want angry with me.
So you claim. But assuming these people exist how you no doubt tried
to fool them would make them angry at YOU.
Who knows, maybe your motorized chair would get possessed...
> Do I believe in
> all that voo doo crap? Not so much.
Santeria is not voodoo Kennie. And if you didn't believe in it why
did you spend so much time MENTIONING the so-called angry Cubans
Santeria followers and their curse?
Who are you trying to fool Kennie?
> But I tend to give the occult a wide
> berth.
Except when supposedly some Santeria followers ask your permission to
curse Moore.... And you gave them your consent to " go for it".
> My biggest tussles have been with some folks who claim they are
> "witches." They don't read their own literature that warns them against
> sending our negative crap. It comes BACK to them ten-fold.
I'm a Pagan Kennie. And its the THREEFOLD Law not tenfold, dumbass,
And the Rede is about RESPONSIBILITY not INACTION.
If I was being sexually assaulted, defending myself even to the
extent of using deadly force is not against the Rede. If I see some
wrong being committed and I can do something about it, I have the
responsibility to decide whether to intervene or not and accept the
consequences of my actions or inactions.
Wicca is not as extreme as Jainism, Kennie. There are people in the
military and in law enforcement who are Pagans and Wiccans. Some
Wiccans choose to be vegans but see nothing wrong with the in essence
genocide of their fruits, vegetables and nuts to nourish them.
If I had chosen the extreme of " passive" non-offense, I would not be
laive now.
So Kennie, your snide remarks about me don't excuse YOUR crap. And I
will point out your crap because in doing so I can PREVENT you from
getting more suckers to victimize.
So what karma may come YOUR way for your intent to allow a curse to
be put on Moore, a curse that was from your consent?
What responsiblility would YOU have in that karmic debt Kennie?
Wait, Kennie can hurl insults, cuss, go on tempter tantrums, do
numerous ad homs, deride and lie and he is immune from karmic debt.
Right Kennie? All your negative energy and words don't come back to
you?
About me Kennie, whatever I choose to do, including arguing with
you, is something I choose to do and whatever karmic debt I incur I
accept. You cannot be a pacifist when fighting wrongs. My immune
system kills invading organisms that adversely affect my health, to
live I must consume formerly living things and my decisions are n
consideration of the possible consequences, good and bad.
In a perfect world everything would be good and peaceful and easy
with no harm to anyone. This is no perfect world. If an area that has
deer has no predator of the deer the deer overpopulate and the whole
species suffers.
Kennie YOUR karma is a bitch for you to get rid of.
KRP > Hey TWAT - did you look at all the people he
KRP > names (HARASSES) with his KEYWORD
KRP > LIST??? And you are TOTALLY FULL OF
KRP > SHIT when you claim that Most of the
KRP > folks into Santeria are in FLORIDA. MANY
KRP > are in New Jersey, lots in Kentucky, New
KRP > York and other places. Your IGNORANCE
KRP > is showing again Maureen. Are you really
KRP > so STUPID, More, that you think that
KRP > people that Moore has declared to be his
KRP > "MARKS" on his KEYWORD list wouldn't
KRP > find out what the little prick is doing and
KRP > perhaps contact me about it? I got asked
KRP > my opinion, and I suggested that if they
KRP > were annoyed to "GO FOR IT!" I was
KRP > told they would.
GH> Dave's key word list is biting him in his own Kharmic ass?
KRP > Moore believe he has some sort of "ENTITLEMENT"
KRP > to harass people in order to BLACKMAIL ME. He
KRP > sees it as his "FREEDOM OF SPEECH." Some
KRP > divine right to harass the people so that I will bow
KRP > to his will. It hasn't worked for a decade of his
KRP > obsession, but he REALLY beliueves it will
KRP > someday. He seems to get away with a great
KRP > deal. He believes the world is AFRAID of him.
KRP > Don't use a big word like Kharma to him. He
KRP > doesn't know what it means. He doesn't
KRP > understand that eventually what he sends
KRP > around WILL come back to him.
Moe > Its KARMA, dungboy. As for what you do
Moe > comes back to you, YOU should
Moe > be concerned about that, hypocrite.
Moe >
Moe > Greg is obsessed with Kent Wills. You
Moe > are obsessed with Dan Sullivan and
Moe > David Moore. Neither of you are a
Moe > credit to society.
You wanted more proof!
Now that you've got it, you call me a stalker.
http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/Supreme_Court/Recent_Opinions/20050506/04-0202.asp?Printable=true
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-bin/seephoto/photosize.cgi?gp=802415452029&size=Large
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ia&vol=sc%5C20050506%5C04-0202&invol=1
http://www.rogersgis.com/zoom/Residential_Development/indexfull.htm
http://www.arcountydata.com/county.asp?county=Benton
TWO of Kent Wills' usenet newsgroup identities:
Tell us, Moe, what exactly set you to raging?
Greg how many posts have you made saying the same goddamn thing about
Kent wills over and over and over again?
Hell, you post the same old shit even in threads that are no longer
active!
And what about your little stalking attempts concerning me, huh Greg?
You ARE obsessed and a stalker Greg.
Seek mental help Greg.
Not "raging" Greg.
And why should I reveal personal details to a stalker like you greg?
MOE> And YOU aren't?
But I am not the one b eating his chest and putting ujp attack websiteS
Maureen and listing INNOCERNT people in an insane effort to BLACKMAIL
others. Your PAL, Moore IS!
Your STALKER buddy!
MOE> Who knows, maybe your motorized chair would get possessed...
It might - IF I had ever had one.
> Maureen it is BAD ENOUGH that you TRY to be a MILITARY EXPERT
MOE> I never claimed to be an expert Kennie, but I sure exposed some of
MOE> your lies about what you claimed you were while in the AF.
YES, Maureen, you HAVE claimed EXPERTISE (actually it turns out to be
search engines). What LIES about my AF service do you THINK you have
"exposed?" Since I have said VERY LITTLE about my service, other than I
*did* serve in the Air Force from 1959 to 1965 HONORABLY. YOU on the other
hand have gone ON AND ON about your DADDY's alleged WAR HEROISM.
> PLEASE Miss Whitebread do NOT even TRY to give me your EXPERT OPINION on
> Spanish culture or the names that people use. You display your STUPIDITY
> for
> the world to see. IN CUBA - on legal forms people use their first name,
> their middle name and then the family name of their father and then their
> mother.
> your BUDDY Moore has staggered all over gthe block like a drunken Marine
> on
> that with his racism.
MOE> I see no racism from Moore, I have seen, however misogyny from you.
Of course YOU would NOT! But then you ahve the IQ of a BRICK!
> MOE> BTW why would a Santeria or Cuban ask for your PERMISSION ( a Gringo)
> MOE> to " go for it" ?
>
> Did I say "PERMISSION?" I said they asked me what I "thought" I said it
> was up to them, but for my part; "GO FOR IT!"
MOE> Were they children Kennie? Why should they ask for your permission of
MOE> they wished to curse Moore themselves?
You don't read well, do you Maureen? They didn't call to ask my
PERMISSION, just what I thought of it. My response, given Moore's
personality was to "GO FOR IT." But they really already had. They asked an
OPINION and NOT for "PERMISSION" which you develop in your own limited SICK
mind.
http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/Supreme_Court/Recent_Opinions/20050506/04-0202.asp?Printable=true
NO GOOD. .She MUST have a "SCAN" of it! In MOEWORLD only SCANS are real.
MOE> So what karma may come YOUR way for your intent to allow a curse to
MOE> be put on Moore, a curse that was from your consent?
I am NOT the emperor of the universe Maureen. I don't have the "POWER"
to allow or prevent any curse from happening. Frankly I can't think of
anyone who more richly deserves to get one than your BUDDY David Moore. I
enjoy you supporting a SKINHEAD.......... Just like you to embrace a Nazi.
"EATING his chest"?
WTF?
On and on? Do show the links to the posts where I have done that
Kennie.
>
> > PLEASE Miss Whitebread do NOT even TRY to give me your EXPERT OPINION on
> > Spanish culture or the names that people use. You display your STUPIDITY
> > for
> > the world to see. IN CUBA - on legal forms people use their first name,
> > their middle name and then the family name of their father and then their
> > mother.
> > your BUDDY Moore has staggered all over gthe block like a drunken Marine
> > on
> > that with his racism.
>
> MOE> I see no racism from Moore, I have seen, however misogyny from you.
>
> Of course YOU would NOT! But then you ahve the IQ of a BRICK!
Even if that were true it would be a higher IQ than your doggie
greg.
They according to you ASKED FOR YOUR PERMISSION.. Tell me Kennie, how
about YOUR responsibility for this alleged curse?
BTW I dislike both skinheads and Nazis.
Kennie, in all honesty your curse story is bullshit. And if you tried
buying the services of a Santeria high priest to perform the curse,
YOU are just as guilty as he would be, karmically and spiritually
speaking.
In the Old Testament of the Bible, Saul after outlawing " occult"
practices, sought the medium or Endor to contact a deceased spirit.
The BibleGod cursed Saul even when he did not himself do the
necromancy.
So Kennie, if you sought out the " curse; for Moore, maybe your God
will curse you.
Why would they ask for your opinion if they already did it?
You aren't thinking through your lies very well Kennie.
MOE> They according to you ASKED FOR YOUR PERMISSION.. Tell me Kennie, how
MOE> about YOUR responsibility for this alleged curse?
They asked my "OPINION" Moe that is NOT asking my "PERMISSION" as your
delusional mind interprets it. My responsibility, Moe, will be in LAUGHING
MY ASS OFF at things like him giving a lecture about his computer EXPERTISE
at work and then having massive involuntary ejaculation in front of all
there. Or perhaps uncontrollable flatulence. Seeing a really HOT woman and
exploding with the loudest FART in recorded history. Funny stuff like that.
Maybe a whole pack of dogs coming and pissing on his legs.
Nice backpedaling attempt. Fails but your usual cowardly retreat
while making noise act.
" Saying " Go for it" is not an opinion Kennie.
Its a command, an agreement with others to make a decisive action.
They asked you and you gave your PERMISSION.
BTW the " ejaculation" story would be of interest to a homosexual
like you. Aimed at a straight woman like me, it shows only your
crudeness and bad sense of humor.
When a guy was caught trying to " satisfy" himself with a big wrench,
he claimed he was adjusting his nuts.
Your crudity, Kennie, is nowhere near the level of the late George
Carlin or Robin Williams. But it is your level of stupidity.
So let me get this " straight" ( so to speak).You think a Santeria "
curse" will make him have involuntary ejaculations while at work?
Or is that just your own imagining?
Do you know how GAY that sounds Kennie?
And do you actually think a curse would do that? Really Kennie?
Why not have a curse on Moore so he is impotent? Or one where he
rapidly becomes bald or has rashes all over?
No YOU gleefully imagine a continuous massive cum stream. Something
a gay male who gobbles that stuff would enjoy.
Admit it Kennie, You're a misogynist homosexual.
Kenneth Pangborn is the type of homosexual that would claim that his
mail order " cum laude" degrees make " qualified" to speak about
ejaculations.
His " qualifications" for farts is because he's full of shit.
Except for David Daniel Moore of 850 Buffalo, Calumet City, IL you
mean?
What's REALLY hilarious about Kent and Dave
being bedfellows is that Dave actually took the
oath as a white supremacist and Kent seems
eager to attract the attention of one.
Dave should be a disgrace to the Nazis.
Kent is a disgrace to Romani people.
MOE> So let me get this " straight" ( so to speak).You think a Santeria "
MOE> curse" will make him have involuntary ejaculations while at work?
Maureen do you WORK on being that STUPID? If you go to a party you
really have NO idea of what people are laughing at, do you? You're always
the LAST person in the room to understand the joke, aren't ya? IF you ever
get it at all, that is.
> MOE> They according to you ASKED FOR YOUR PERMISSION.. Tell me Kennie, how
> MOE> about YOUR responsibility for this alleged curse?
>
> They asked my "OPINION" Moe that is NOT asking my "PERMISSION" as your
> delusional mind interprets it. My responsibility, Moe, will be in LAUGHING
> MY ASS OFF at things like him giving a lecture about his computer
> EXPERTISE
> at work and then having massive involuntary ejaculation in front of all
> there. Or perhaps uncontrollable flatulence. Seeing a really HOT woman and
> exploding with the loudest FART in recorded history. Funny stuff like
> that.
> Maybe a whole pack of dogs coming and pissing on his legs.
MOE> " Saying " Go for it" is not an opinion Kennie.
Yeah it is Maureen. It was MY opinion, and *I* get to say what MY
opinion is NOT YOU!
MOE> Kenneth Pangborn is the type of homosexual that would
Tell me Moe - am I supposed to be so "homophobic" that YOU calling me a
homosexual is supposed to threaten my manhood? After 3 marriages to ADULT
WOMEN and 4 children, I think the issue of my sexuality is fairly well
settled as an issue. I bet you would even make something of the fact that I
am okay with gay marriage. I think they have a right to be as miserable as
the rest of us. I am not LIKE YOU, Maureen, I don't suffer a delusion that I
need to REGULATE other people's lives. YOU DO! It's an OBSESSION with you.
Maybe YOU are HETEROPHOBIC?
LOL
> Moe > BTW I dislike both skinheads and Nazis.
> Except for David Daniel Moore of 850 Buffalo, Calumet City, IL you
> mean?
Moe isn't too bright. She hasn't a clue as to Davey's Nazi beliefs. She
hasn't a clue as to why his hair is shaved off and he makes stupid claims
that I have a "comb over." I have a part in my hair. They used to call the
style "Ivy league" my hair was very long when I was in high school and wore
it in the "greaser style" as they called it then. With a "DA." Oh my days of
being a rebel and devotee of Jack Kerouac.
GH> LOL
Moe has a great "COMMAND" of the English language. She puts on the
leather witch's outfit , spike heels, and her whip and she tortures the hell
out of it till it says whatever sick thing is in that thing SHE calls a mind
of hers.
> Tell me Moe - am I supposed to be so "homophobic" that YOU calling me a
> homosexual is supposed to threaten my manhood? After 3 marriages to ADULT
> WOMEN and 4 children, I think the issue of my sexuality is fairly well
> settled as an issue. I bet you would even make something of the fact that I
> am okay with gay marriage. I think they have a right to be as miserable as
> the rest of us. I am not LIKE YOU, Maureen, I don't suffer a delusion that I
> need to REGULATE other people's lives. YOU DO! It's an OBSESSION with you.
> Maybe YOU are HETEROPHOBIC?
Moe uses plastic.
GH> Moe uses plastic.
Gotta tell you about a case we had in Texas some years ago. The couple
had this HUGE collection of various kinds of "sexual appliances" for the
wife who was accusing the soon to be ex-husband of being a molester. We
managed to bring in this big box of them for the trial. When she was being
cross examiend we had her tell the stories about each one. (IN Texas in a
custody case you can get a jury trial. Believe me every one of them had a
story that brought a chuckle to the jury about miss prim and proper. We
saved the best for last. It was a AC unit, looked like it had a motor for a
mix master. Our lawyer asked her when the last time she used it. She
testified that she hadn't used it for a year or so. The lawyer with a VERY
straight face asked her; "Why not?" Then came the answer that put the whole
jury (AND the Judge) on the floor. "Because, she said, it burned out." The
lawyer than asked her if she founf the model made by "EVINRUDE" in the
catalogs?
> I didns;t say homoPHOBIC Kennei I said homoSEXUAL.
If you want to hid ebehind your marriage claims bear in mind that Ted
Haggard was married but that didn't prevent him form seeking out males
to suck and fuck.
Do you have a comprehension problem with words of more than five
letters?
Homophobic is fear of gays, Homosexual is being gay.
Do try to understand the difference.
> that YOU calling me a
> homosexual is supposed to threaten my manhood?
You speak about the " manhood" of others. If you were this wonderful
guy you pretend to be, whatever comment about your " manhood" I would
make would not be relevant.
I judge a guy not by the dimensions of his dick but by the person he
is. And you aren't much of a person, to be honest.
> After 3 marriages to ADULT
> WOMEN and 4 children
Some of them divorced you. Your daughters want nothing to do with
you. One of your daughters is a porn " actress". You show a rabid
misogyny. That doesn't paint a good picture of you as a husband and a
a father Kennie.
> I think the issue of my sexuality is fairly well
> settled as an issue.
Yep you're a female hating gay.
> I bet you would even make something of the fact that I
> am okay with gay marriage.
As a homosexual you would be. Is Greg on your wedding plans?
BTW I am for gays marrying.
> I think they have a right to be as miserable as
> the rest of us. I am not LIKE YOU, Maureen,
Like I care Kennie? The feeling is mutual. I despise you.
> I don't suffer a delusion that I
> need to REGULATE other people's lives. YOU DO! It's an OBSESSION with you.
> Maybe YOU are HETEROPHOBIC?
I fear straight people?
Looks at boyfriend.
MMMMMM!
Looks at photos of Tom Welling.
MMMMMMM!!!!!
Looks at video of two homosexuals doing it.
Meh, Nothing.
Since I am straight how can I fear straight people?
Kennie have you been drinking again. You;re making less sense than
usual.
Which isn't saying much because you usually are full of crap as it
is.
Kennie the problem with your stories about yourself is that when
examined they turn out to be lies.
>spike heels, and her whip and she tortures the hell
> out of it till it says whatever sick thing is in that thing SHE calls a mind
> of hers.
Your fantasies of me being a dominatrix to your masochism might
explain why you seem to like me exposing your lies about your AF
"service". Perhaps your sexual fantasies of me whipping you with my
"whip" is the impulse behind your squallings and yammerings.
Sorry Kennie BDSM is not my thing. If you want a dominatrix in
leather and high heels sticking her whip up your arse, go somewhere
and pay for it.
Assuming she could find your butthole hidden behind your immense butt
cheeks.
> I didns;t say homoPHOBIC Kennei I said homoSEXUAL.
If you want to hid ebehind your marriage claims bear in mind that Ted
Haggard was married but that didn't prevent him form seeking out males
to suck and fuck.
Do you have a comprehension problem with words of more than five
letters?
Homophobic is fear of gays, Homosexual is being gay.
Do try to understand the difference.
I am NEITHER Maureen!
If "our" Kent is NOT Kent Bradley Wills then
his ""Fake ID"" has worked well, so what's
the problem?
Consider Kent's OWN comments about:
A. regarding his sister (by name)
B. property in CORPORATION name (Wills Family Trust)
C. footage of "Wills" plaque avoiding first name
D. apt building at 202 NW College Ave Ankeny IA
E. past residence in various cities in IA
F. connection to Arkansas
G. that he set up/was assigned this ""Fake ID""
Does an actual Garage Burglary Felon have a
RIGHT to con people into thinking he ISN'T one, Moe?
Does a TWO time thieving Felon actually have
a right against having his record exposed?
Kent Bradley Wills DOB Jan 8 1969 Felony Garage Burglar used teen as
accomplice
http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/Supreme_Court/Recent_Opinions/20050506/04-0202.asp?Printable=true
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-bin/seephoto/photosize.cgi?gp=802415452029&size=Large
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ia&vol=sc%5C20050506%5C04-0202&invol=1
http://www.rogersgis.com/zoom/Residential_Development/indexfull.htm
http://www.arcountydata.com/county.asp?county=Benton
TWO of Kent Wills' usenet newsgroup identities:
If "our" Kent is NOT Kent Bradley Wills then
his ""Fake ID"" has worked well, so what's
the problem?
Consider Kent's OWN comments about:
A. regarding his sister (by name)
B. property in CORPORATION name (Wills Family Trust)
C. footage of "Wills" plaque avoiding first name
D. apt building at 202 NW College Ave Ankeny IA
E. past residence in various cities in IA
F. connection to Arkansas
G. that he set up/was assigned this ""Fake ID""
Does an actual Garage Burglary Felon have a
RIGHT to con people into thinking he ISN'T one, Moe?
Does a TWO time thieving Felon actually have
a right against having his record exposed?
Kent Bradley Wills AKA Compuelf DOB Jan 8 1969 Felony Garage Burglar
The problem is if the Kent Wlils here is not the "real" Kent Wills
with the felony convictions, greg, then the " real" one in coming
across your obsessive harrasssing crap just MIGHT be annoyed enough
to pay you a personal visit.
Not ac problem for ME, one for YOU.
>
> Consider Kent's OWN comments about:
> A. regarding his sister (by name)
> B. property in CORPORATION name (Wills Family Trust)
> C. footage of "Wills" plaque avoiding first name
> D. apt building at 202 NW College Ave Ankeny IA
> E. past residence in various cities in IA
> F. connection to Arkansas
> G. that he set up/was assigned this ""Fake ID""
>
> Does an actual Garage Burglary Felon have a
> RIGHT to con people into thinking he ISN'T one, Moe?
>
> Does a TWO time thieving Felon actually have
> a right against having his record exposed?
Both questions you've asked over and over but are not relevant
because they are not THE question, being is the person posting with
the nym Kent Wills the same one you've been stalking?
You should consider the results of your own words, Greg, particularly
your recent noise about contacting the " other' Greg Hanson about what
" Kent Wills' Is posting verbatum, implying that the " other" greg
will come after Kent. Problem is that " other" Greg Hanson is a racist
and proud of it, so he would have no problem his words being
disseminated. Now the problem for YOU is that if there is an "
convicted felon" Kent Wills who ISN"Y the one posting here, HE might
have a problem with what you;re doing using his name.
The "Kent Bradley Wills" attached to that name via some court records
YOU claim are about the nym "Kent Bradley Wills " here might be about
someone that will get tired of YOU repeatedly posting his records, and
decide that if he dealt with you directly it' might not count as a
felony ths time. And if he did some time he might have learned some
of the things cons like to teach each other. Real nasty stuff Greg.
Have you actually thought this out clearly enough Greg or do you
think you are somehow invincible? Did you actually think that a twice
convicted felon might NOT be someone you should mess with? Did you
think your online crap would be a cover and no one would find you?
Here's food for thought. Aren't felons more dangerous than those
convicted of misdemeanors ( like you)?
But then I wouldn't lose sleep over it since I am not you...
Moe
Proud daughter of a veteran
The real Kenneth Pangborn-- www.aboutkenpangborn.com
Moe > The problem is if the Kent Wlils here is not
Moe > the "real" Kent Wills with the felony
Moe > convictions, greg, then the " real" one
Moe > in coming across your obsessive
Moe > harrasssing crap just MIGHT be annoyed
Moe > enough to pay you a personal visit.
But the guy who claims he was "assigned"
the identity and who uses the identity
and blabbed about so many identifying
details would supposedly not be a target, right?
Did you forget that Kent even posted PHOTOS
of himself online, and that he was on probation?
Moe > Not ac problem for ME, one for YOU.
G > Consider Kent's OWN comments about:
G > A. regarding his sister (by name)
G > B. property in CORPORATION name (Wills Family Trust)
G > C. footage of "Wills" plaque avoiding first name
G > D. apt building at 202 NW College Ave Ankeny IA
G > E. past residence in various cities in IA
G > F. connection to Arkansas
G > G. that he set up/was assigned this ""Fake ID""
G >
G > Does an actual Garage Burglary Felon have a
G > RIGHT to con people into thinking he ISN'T one, Moe?
G >
G > Does a TWO time thieving Felon actually have
G > a right against having his record exposed?
Moe > Both questions you've asked over and
Moe > over but are not relevant because they
Moe > are not THE question, being is the
Moe > person posting with the nym Kent Wills
Moe > the same one you've been stalking?
Did you forget that Kent only went off probation in December?
You DO know that Kent posted PHOTOS of himself online, right?
Kent's comments about the 202 NW College apartment building?
Kent's own claims about various past cities in Iowa he lived in?
Kent's own claims about a connection to both Iowa and Arkansas?
G > You should consider the results of your own
G > words, Greg, particularly your recent noise
G > about contacting the " other' Greg Hanson
G > about what " Kent Wills' Is posting verbatum,
G > implying that the " other" greg will come after
G > Kent. Problem is that " other" Greg Hanson
G > is a racist and proud of it, so he would have
G > no problem his words being disseminated.
By an immigrant imbecile who falsely tries to
play the "race card"? How did you think this
was going to end well? LOL
G > Now the problem for YOU is that if there is
G > an "convicted felon" Kent Wills who ISN"Y
G > the one posting here, HE might have a
G > problem with what you;re doing using his name.
As opposed to being upset at the moron who actually
claimed he was "assigned" the name and at other times
claimed that he ""set up"" the name as a Fake ID.
Like posting his birthday on a web page that
he was the webmaster of for YEARS and when
it became problematic, the ""new"" webmaster
instantly removed Kent's name and birthday.
Did I force ""our"" Kent Wills to use that birthday
even many YEARS before I had ever heard of Kent?
Moe > The "Kent Bradley Wills" attached to that name
Moe > via some court records YOU claim are about
Moe > the nym "Kent Bradley Wills " here might be
Moe > about someone that will get tired of YOU
Moe > repeatedly posting his records, and decide
Moe > that if he dealt with you directly it' might
Moe > not count as a felony ths time.
Did you forget that Kent posted several photos online?
I'm ten years older with pudgy belly, but Kent's a FATASS.
This lame ass veiled threat is hilarious!
Moe > And if he did some time he might have learned some
Moe > of the things cons like to teach each other. Real nasty stuff
Greg.
I learned how to play dominos from hard core repeat offenders.
Kent adopted the ""Fake ID"" so as far as I am concerned
it is ""our"" Kent's responsibility to prove that he
is not the notorious sneek thief Born Jan 8, 1969.
He could do a 200% xerox of his DL and let me
keep the xerox and check the hologram.
I would verify it with KBW's former probation
officer, of course.
If he showed up it would be a RIOT but
I would not pee my pants like Dave did
when Ken went to Chicago to address
a crowd.
Moe > Have you actually thought this out clearly
Moe > enough Greg or do you think you are
Moe > somehow invincible?
I've seen Kent's on line photographs.
Moe > Did you actually think that a twice
Moe > convicted felon might NOT be someone you should mess with?
Kent hinted that it was more than two felonies.
But the two that are visible are for THIEVING!
The stupid cons and the veiled threats won't work.
Moe > Did you think your online crap would
Moe > be a cover and no one would find you?
In the PHONE BOOK you mean?
Somebody had to HELP Roberta
to find me in an on-line version of
the phone book, and she posted
my address and phone number
repeatedly years ago.
Moe > Here's food for thought. Aren't felons
Moe > more dangerous than those convicted
Moe > of misdemeanors ( like you)?
Kent's a friggin' SNEEK THIEF! LOL
Moe > But then I wouldn't lose sleep over
Moe > it since I am not you...
I love how you think you're taking the moral high ground.
Moronic.
If "our" Kent is NOT Kent Bradley Wills then
his ""Fake ID"" has worked well, so what's
the problem?
Consider Kent's OWN comments about:
A. regarding his sister (by name)
B. property in CORPORATION name (Wills Family Trust)
C. footage of "Wills" plaque avoiding first name
D. apt building at 202 NW College Ave Ankeny IA
E. past residence in various cities in IA
F. connection to Arkansas
G. that he set up/was assigned this ""Fake ID""
Does an actual Garage Burglary Felon have a
RIGHT to con people into thinking he ISN'T one, Moe?
Does a TWO time thieving Felon actually have
a right against having his record exposed?
Kent Bradley Wills AKA Compuelf DOB Jan 8 1969 Felony Garage Burglar
Sadly, Greg's continued use and abuse of illegal drugs, the same use
and abuse he admitted causes him to stalk the members of alt.friends, won't
permit him to stop. He may even want to stop devoting so much of his life
to me and who his drug induced delusions think I am, but he can't.
I have become nearly the single most important item in his life. I'm
not quite number one yet, but clearly G'Tard's use and abuse of illegal
drugs is pushing ever closer to that status.
As further proof look to this thread. It had nothing to do with G'Tard
in any fashion. However, since I was a part of it, G'Tard's drug addled
mind REQUIRED that he post. That's how important I am in his life.
Greg's obsession further proves that no one should ever listen to
anything the extremely PRO CPS Gregory Scott Hanson claims. He want CPS to
win 100% of the time and gets very upset if anyone deals with CPS and wins.
A truth proved MANY times over the years.
If not for the fact that it's further proof, if any were needed, that
his use and abuse of illegal drugs has seriously messed up his mind, the
matter would be funny.
On 03/30/1999 Sweeney's filed on Kent for UNPAID RENT!
GeoParcel 8024-15-452-029 District/Parcel 181/00392-048-000
[ As Collected July 15, 2009 ]
Seller: WILLS, FRED A. & JANET R.
Buyer: THE SWEENEY REVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST
04/26/1994 135,000 D/Deed 7010/188
-
Seller: SHELDAHL, ERIC A.
Buyer: WILLS, FRED
01/02/1990 130,500 D/Deed 6189/972
A Larger photo:
http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-bin/seephoto/photosize.cgi?gp=802415452029&size=Large
Notice that name SWEENEY above?
Check this out!
Iowa Courts Docket and Disposition web site
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/
Iowa Courts
Online Search
< Start A Case Search Here! > click
Iowa Courts Online Search
Search Selection
Under Trial Court < click on Case Search >
Wills Kent B
02401 ESPR015146 INA J WILLS ESTATE
05771 FECR145250 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
05771 FECR176876 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
05771 SCSC310505 SWEENEY RENTALS VS KENT ******
05771 SCSC335210 CITI FINANCIAL VS KENT
05771 SCSC374163 SFI F SCHERLE PRES VS KENT
05771 SCSC374164 SFI F SCHERLE III PRES VS KENT
05771 STAN201670 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969
05771 STAN210929 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969
05771 SWCR177169 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
A list of case numbers will be presented.
Click on the SWEENEY case, 4th one down.
Under the "Filings" tab:
JUDGEMENT DEFAULT BRANDT GREGORY D 08/25/1999 09/01/1999 09/01/1999
Comments: $156.25 7.244% FROM 03/30/99
COMPUTER GENERATED NOTICE 05/11/1999 05/11/1999 05/11/1999
Comments: Notice of Proof of Claim
RETURN OF ORIGINAL NOTICE 04/21/1999 04/23/1999 04/23/1999
Comments: 4/10/99 KENT PERS
37.60
VERIFICATION OF ACCT HAS BEEN FILED 03/30/1999 03/30/1999
03/30/1999
SMALL CLAIMS ORIGINAL NOTICE SWEENEY RENTALS 03/30/1999 03/30/1999
03/30/1999
Comments: UNPAID RENT
Under the "Financial" Tab:
Summary Orig Paid Due
COSTS 98.60 31.00 67.60
FINE 0.00 0.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 0.00
RESTITUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00
OTHER 238.46 0.00 238.46
-----------
$337.06 $31.00 $306.06
SUPPORT/ALIMONY N/A 0.00 N/A
-------------------------------------
Do It Yourself Instructions to look up Kent's record
Iowa Department of Corrections records for Kent
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
Name Kent Bradley Wills [ As Collected March 7, 2009 ]
Offender Number 1155768
Sex M
Birth Date 01/08/1969
Age 40
Location
Offense
County Of Commitment
Commitment Date
Duration
TDD/SDD *
* TDD = Tentative Discharge Date
* SDD = Supervision Discharge Date
Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date
Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk 12/16/2008
Probation C Felony Polk 12/16/2008
Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date
Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk 11/25/2003
Iowa Courts Docket and Disposition web site
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/
Iowa Courts
Online Search
< Start A Case Search Here! > click
Iowa Courts Online Search
Search Selection
Under Trial Court < click on Case Search >
Wills Kent B
02401 ESPR015146 INA J WILLS ESTATE
05771 FECR145250 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
05771 FECR176876 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
05771 SCSC310505 SWEENEY RENTALS VS KENT
05771 SCSC335210 CITI FINANCIAL VS KENT
05771 SCSC374163 SFI F SCHERLE PRES VS KENT
05771 SCSC374164 SFI F SCHERLE III PRES VS KENT
05771 STAN201670 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969
05771 STAN210929 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969
05771 SWCR177169 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
A list of case numbers will be presented.
Two on that list have the code "FE" in them.
One of the two ends in the two digits "76".
Click that case number.
A case caption will appear.
Tabs available to the public include
"Criminal Charges", "Filings" and "Financial".
Use the "back" button on your browser to move among them
or just hit the various tab buttons.
(See filings text if attached further down below)
IN PRINTED LAW BOOKS
West's North Western Reporter
Second Series
A Unit of the National Reporter System
Volume 696 N.W.2d
Cite as 696 N.W.2d 20 (Iowa 2005)
Kent's Appeal
http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/Supreme_Court/Recent_Opinions/20050506/04-0202.asp?Printable=true
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ia&vol=sc%5C20050506%5C04-0202&invol=1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005
STATE OF IOWA,
Appellee,
vs.
KENT BRADLEY WILLS,
Appellant.
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk
County, Michael D. Huppert, Judge.
Defendant appeals claiming ineffective
assistance of counsel. AFFIRMED.
Linda Del Gallo, State Appellate Defender,
and Tricia Johnston, Assistant State
Appellate Defender, for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kevin
Cmelik, Assistant Attorney General, John P.
Sarcone, County Attorney, and John Judisch,
Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.
WIGGINS, Justice.
Kent Wills appeals his conviction for
second-degree burglary contending that
an attached garage is a separate occupied
structure from that of the living quarters
of the residence. In this appeal, we must
determine whether trial counsel was
ineffective for (1) failing to move for
judgment of acquittal on the basis there
was insufficient evidence to convict Wills
of second-degree burglary when he entered
an attached garage of a residence when no
persons were present in the garage, but
when persons were present in the living
quarters; and (2) failing to object to a
jury instruction based on this same
argument. Because we find there was no
legal basis for the motion for judgment
of acquittal or the objection to the jury
instruction, Wills' trial counsel was not
ineffective. Accordingly, we affirm the
judgment of the district court.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings.
Around 1 a.m., an Ankeny resident called
the local police to report that a car
alarm sounded in the resident's
neighborhood. The city dispatched a police
officer to the location. Observing nothing
unusual, the officer left the area, only
to be stopped a couple of blocks later
by a person who informed the officer he
had witnessed someone running from the
area of the car alarm. As the officer
started driving back to the area of the
car alarm, he noticed a person walking
on the sidewalk. The officer asked the
person, a minor, if he had noticed anybody
running from the area. The minor answered
that he had not. While the officer and
another officer were speaking to the minor,
another resident of the neighborhood
arrived in her car and informed the
officers that she had observed two people,
one of whom was heavy set with a blinking
light on his back pocket, walking in the
area of her neighbor's residence. She
observed the heavier-set individual, later
identified as Wills, enter her neighbor's
attached garage through an unlocked service
door. She further observed a smaller
individual standing by a van parked in
the neighbor's driveway.
The officers eventually let the minor leave
even though they found a large amount of
coins, a flashlight, and an electronic
pocket organizer in his pockets. After
releasing the minor, the police officers
drove to the residence where the neighbor
observed the two suspicious people and
woke the owner. The owner, his wife,
and two daughters were in the residence
sleeping at the time. After a search
of his vehicles, the owner discovered
change and an electronic pocket organizer
were missing from the vehicles. The
owner's daughter reported a diamond ring
and some change were missing from her
vehicle. The officers then contacted
the minor's parents, who informed the
officers the minor was with Wills. After
the officers questioned the minor again,
he admitted his involvement in the theft
and implicated Wills in the burglary.
Although Wills denied involvement in the
burglary, the officers arrested him.
The State filed a trial information
charging Wills with second-degree
burglary. The State later amended the
information to include two additional
charges of burglary in the third degree
and using a juvenile to commit an
indictable offense.
The jury returned a verdict finding Wills
guilty of the crimes of burglary in the
second degree, burglary in the third
degree, and using a juvenile to commit
an indictable offense. Wills appeals his
conviction for second-degree burglary
claiming ineffective assistance of
counsel.
II. Scope of Review.
Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel
are derived from the Sixth Amendment of the
United States Constitution. Strickland v.
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 684-86, 104 S.
Ct. 2052, 2063-64, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674, 691-93
(1984). Our review for a claim involving
violations of the Constitution is de novo.
State v. Fintel, 689 N.W.2d 95, 100
(Iowa 2004). We normally preserve
ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims
for postconviction relief actions. State
v. Carter, 602 N.W. 2d 818, 820 (Iowa 1999).
However, we will address such claims on
direct appeal when the record is sufficient
to permit a ruling. State v. Artzer,
609 N.W.2d 526, 531 (Iowa 2000). The
appellate record in the present case is
sufficient to allow us to address Wills'
ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims
on direct appeal.
In order for a defendant to succeed on a
claim of ineffective assistance of counsel,
the defendant must prove: (1) counsel
failed to perform an essential duty and
(2) prejudice resulted. Id. Prejudice
results when "there is a reasonable
probability that, but for the counsel's
unprofessional errors, the result of the
proceeding would have been different."
State v. Hopkins, 576 N.W.2d 374, 378
(Iowa 1998) (quoting Strickland, 466
U.S. at 694, 104 S. Ct. at 2068,
80 L. Ed. 2d at 698). Wills' arguments
also raise issues of statutory
interpretation, which we review for
correction of errors at law. State v.
Wolford Corp., 689 N.W.2d 471, 473 (Iowa 2004).
III. Analysis.
To find Wills guilty of burglary in the
second degree, the State had to prove
Wills perpetrated a burglary "in or
upon an occupied structure in which one
or more persons are present . . . ." Iowa
Code § 713.5(2) (2003) (emphasis added).
In this appeal, Wills first contends his
trial counsel was ineffective for failing
to move for a judgment of acquittal on
the basis there was insufficient evidence
to support a finding that at the time Wills
entered the garage, there were persons
present in or upon the occupied structure.
Wills concedes the garage was an occupied
structure, but argues the living quarters
and the attached garage are separate and
independent occupied structures; therefore,
the jury could not have found there were
people present in the attached garage
at the time of the burglary.
The Code defines an "occupied structure" as:
[A]ny building, structure, appurtenances
to buildings and structures, land, water
or air vehicle, or similar place adapted
for overnight accommodation of persons,
or occupied by persons for the purpose of
carrying on business or other activity
therein, or for the storage or safekeeping
of anything of value. Such a structure
is an "occupied structure" whether or not
a person is actually present.
Id. § 702.12.
Wills relies on State v. Smothers, 590
N.W.2d 721 (Iowa 1999), to argue the
garage and the living quarters are separate
and independent occupied structures. In
Smothers, two separate and distinct
businesses connected by interior fire doors
were operated in the same structure.
590 N.W.2d at 723. We held the defendant
committed two burglaries by entering each
business because "[t]he facility's
construction history and physical make-up
demonstrate that the portions are
independent working units which constitute
'[a] combination of materials to form a
construction for occupancy [or] use.'" Id.
Smothers is not at odds with the present
case because the living quarters and the
garage are not separate or independent
units of the residence.
Our review of the record reveals the garage
in question was a three-car attached garage
separated from the living quarters by a
door. The same roof covered the garage as
the rest of the residence. The living
quarters surrounded the garage on two sides.
It was structurally no different from any
other room in the residence.
The garage was a functional part of the
residence. On the night of the incident,
the door was unlocked. The owner of the
residence used two stalls in the garage to
park the family vehicles. The owner used
the third stall for his motorcycle. As
such, the garage and the living quarters
are a single "structure" or "building"
functioning as an integral part of the
family residence. Thus, the residence
including the garage is a single
"occupied structure" under section 702.12.
See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr.
2d 256 (Ct. App.1995) (holding defendant's
entry into an attached garage constituted
first-degree burglary because the garage
was attached to the house; therefore,
burglary of the garage was burglary of
an inhabited dwelling house); People v.
Cunningham, 637 N.E.2d 1247, 1252 (Ill.
App. Ct. 1994) (holding "ordinarily an
attached garage is a 'dwelling' because
it is part of the structure in which
the owner or occupant lives");
State v. Lara, 587 P.2d 52, 53
(N.M. Ct. App. 1978) (holding "burglary
of the [attached] garage was burglary of
the dwelling house because the garage was
a part of the structure used as living
quarters"); People v. Green, 141 A.D.2d
760, 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988) (holding
"[s]ince the garage in the present case
was structurally part of a building
which was used for overnight lodging of
various persons, it must be considered
as part of a dwelling"); White v. State,
630 S.W. 2d 340, 342 (Tex. Ct. App. 1982)
(holding an attached garage under the
same roof as the home would be considered
a habitation within the purview of the
penal code because the garage is a
structure appurtenant to and connected
to the house); State v. Murbach, 843 P.
2d 551, 553 (Wash. Ct. App 1993)
(holding the definition of a dwelling
under Washington's burglary statute
included an attached garage).
Had Wills' trial counsel moved for a
judgment of acquittal on the basis there
was insufficient evidence to support
a finding that at the time Wills
entered the garage there were no persons
present in or upon the occupied
structure, it would have been overruled
by the court because the owner and his
family were present in the residence at
the time of the burglary.
Wills also claims his counsel was
ineffective for failing to object to
the jury instruction used by the district
court on the same ground; that the
living quarters were a separate and
independent occupied structure from the
attached garage. The instruction as
given stated:
The State must prove all of the following
elements of Burglary in the Second
Degree as to Count I:
1. On or about the 12th day of August,
2003, the defendant or someone he aided
and abetted broke into or entered the
residence at . . . .
2. The residence at . . . was an occupied
structure as defined in Instruction No. 29.
3. The defendant or the person he aided
and abetted did not have permission or
authority to break into the residence at ...
4. The defendant or the person he aided
and abetted did so with the specific
intent to commit a theft therein.
5. During the incident persons were present
in or upon the occupied structure.
If the State has proved all of the elements,
the defendant is guilty of Burglary in the
Second Degree. If the State has failed to prove
any of the elements, the defendant is not
guilty of Burglary in the Second Degree and
you will then consider the charge of
Attempted Burglary in the Second Degree
explained in Instruction No. 21.
(Emphasis added.)
Wills' claim is without merit. As we have
discussed, the residence is the one and
only "occupied structure" under the facts
of this case. Had Wills' trial counsel
made this objection to the instruction,
it would have been overruled.
Therefore, Wills' trial counsel is not
ineffective for failing to move
for a judgment of acquittal or objecting
to the instruction because there was no
legal basis for the motion or objection.
See State v. Hochmuth, 585 N.W.2d 234,
238 (Iowa 1998) (holding trial counsel was
not ineffective for failing to raise an
issue that has no merit).
IV. Disposition.
We affirm the judgment of the district
court because Wills' trial counsel was
not ineffective for failing to raise
meritless issues.
AFFIRMED.
-----------------------------------
[ As Collected March 7, 2009 ]
Filings
Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS
Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK)
Citation Number:
Event Filed By Filed Create Date Last Updated Action Date
ORDER OF DISCHARGE OVROM ELIZA 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 12/16/2008
Comments: FROM PROBATION
OTHER EVENT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 12/16/2008 12/16/2008
12/16/2008
Comments: FIELD DISCHARGE REPORT
OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 12/16/2008
Comments: REVOCATION HEARING SET FOR 1/07/2009 IS CANCELLED
DEFENDANT HAS NOT PAID IN FULL FINANCIAL
OBLIGATIONS
ORDER FOR PROBATION REVOCATION HEARING MOISAN CYNTHIA M 12/05/2008
12/05/2008 12/05/2008
Comments: ON 1/7/09 AT 9:30AM RM204
PROBATION REVOCATION 12/05/2008 12/05/2008 12/05/2008
Comments: REPORT OF VIOLATIONS FILED BY JAN HORNOCKER
FORMAL PROBATION HUTCHISON ROBERT A 01/25/2006 01/26/2006
01/26/2006
Comments: EXTENDED TO 01/16/09 OR UNTIL CONDITIONS ARE MET
COURT ORDERED PAYMENT PLAN 01/13/2006 01/13/2006 01/13/2006
[ ... ]
"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:08a77bdf-a63c-4599...@o6g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
> Pay close attention to past owners of 202 NW College Ave.
WHO GIVES A FUCK!
This is getting old! Nobody cares! Give it a rest! Go get a hobby or
something.....
BE > WHO GIVES A FUCK!
BE >
BE > This is getting old! Nobody cares! Give it a rest!
BE > Go get a hobby or something.....
Hi Kent!
Obsession noted.
Greg does this occasionally. He's so obsessed about " Kent Wills"
that he has to repeat the same old shit every month or so. His
stalking attempts suck and he even had a chance to meet " Kent" face
to face but he chickened out.
Greg has no life and he lives in a trailer home his GF owns.
Gregory S Hanson DOB 05/22/1959, 1071 F Ave NW Cedar Rapids, IA 52405
Google maps has a photo of where he lives.
BE > WHO GIVES A FUCK!
BE >
BE > This is getting old! Nobody cares! Give it a rest!
BE > Go get a hobby or something.....
G > Hi Kent!
Moe > Obsession noted.
Moe >
Moe > Greg does this occasionally. He's so
Moe > obsessed about " Kent Wills" that he
Moe > has to repeat the same old shit every
Moe > month or so. His stalking attempts
Moe > suck and he even had a chance to
Moe > meet " Kent" face to face but he
Moe > chickened out.
Kent paid the debt and the court date was
cancelled about two weeks before the date.
(Summarized for brevity)
Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK)
12/16/2008 OVROM ELIZA REVOCATION HEARING
SET FOR 1/07/2009 IS CANCELLED
Moe > Greg has no life and he lives in a trailer home his GF owns.
Moe >
Moe > Google maps has a photo of where he lives.
Where's the trailer?
Where's the edge of the trailer court?
Why does your Google link show a different house number?
Sheesh, you imbecile! Do I have o give you instructions on how to use
it?
When the map icon come sup and the dialog box pops up under your
icon, there is a part where you click so you can see photos of the
street and address.
Do I have to walk you through the steps, little boy? If I am as "
stupid" as Kennei claims I am and I can figure out how to work Google
Maps, YOU should be able to do it without help, right Greg?
Or is such a simple thing too complicated for you?
Moe
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
List of edited out Pangborn web pages.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/...
BE > WHO GIVES A FUCK!
BE >
BE > This is getting old! Nobody cares! Give it a rest!
BE > Go get a hobby or something.....
G > Hi Kent!
Moe > Obsession noted.
Moe >
Moe > Greg does this occasionally. He's so
Moe > obsessed about " Kent Wills" that he
Moe > has to repeat the same old shit every
Moe > month or so. His stalking attempts
Moe > suck and he even had a chance to
Moe > meet " Kent" face to face but he
Moe > chickened out.
G > Kent paid the debt and the court date was
G > cancelled about two weeks before the date.
IA > (Summarized for brevity)
IA > Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS
IA > Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK)
IA > 12/16/2008 OVROM ELIZA REVOCATION
IA > HEARING SET FOR 1/07/2009 IS CANCELLED
Moe > Greg has no life and he lives in a trailer home his GF owns.
Moe >
Moe > Google maps has a photo of where he lives.
G > Where's the trailer?
G > Where's the edge of the trailer court?
G > Why does your Google link show a different house number?
Moe > Sheesh, you imbecile!
Moe > Do I have o give you instructions on how to use it?
Moe > When the map icon come sup and the
Moe > dialog box pops up under your icon,
Moe > there is a part where you click so you
Moe > can see photos of the street and address.
Moe > Do I have to walk you through the steps,
Moe > little boy? If I am as "stupid" as Kennei
Moe > claims I am and I can figure out how to
Moe > work Google Maps, YOU should be
Moe > able to do it without help, right Greg?
Moe >
Moe > Or is such a simple thing too complicated for you?
Apparently. The LINK you posted shows
no trailer homes anywhere in sight!
Certainly no edge of a trailer court.
And doesn't show the house number
you indicated. Why would that be?
Getting a clue?
Yeah, you are stupid. That's clue enough for me.
I used your address Greg:
1071 F Ave NW Cedar Rapids, IA 52405
Moe
G > Hi Kent!
G > Apparently. The LINK you posted shows
G > no trailer homes anywhere in sight!
G > Certainly no edge of a trailer court.
G >
G > And doesn't show the house number
G > you indicated. Why would that be?
G >
G > Getting a clue?
Moe > Yeah, you are stupid. That's clue enough for me.
Moe > I used your address Greg:
When you put that address into Google Street
View, why doesn't it show you that house number?
Why doesn't it show a trailer house?
Why doesn't it show the edge of a trailer court?
YOU asserted I live in a trailer.
YOU asserted you looked at a CLEAR picture of it.
YOU said it was on the edge of a trailer court.
Where is that photo?
I told you how to click the map icon and open the map dialogue box to
access the photo option. Don't blame me if you can't do simple
instructions.
You have two separate threads about this greg. All with the same
imbecilic problem of you not being able to actually work Google Maps.
A problem even a fourth grader could show you how to do.
Kennie knows how to work it. Ask him.
Why doesn't it show a trailer house?
Why doesn't it show the edge of a trailer court?
YOU asserted I live in a trailer.
YOU asserted you looked at a CLEAR picture of it.
YOU said it was on the edge of a trailer court.
Is ANY of that true?
Who started TWO threads on this, Moe?
You did!
yours in Christ,
isamu
You can take the trash out of the tralier park, but you can't take the
trailer park out of the trash.
Actually you did two threads on it. Its not my fault that you can't
operate Google Maps worth a damn so you can actually see the 360
degree photos based on the street position.
As for the trailer " mistake" I deliberately did that to see if you
would bite. before I revealed my " oopsie" you did not make a big deal
about the trailer mistake. In fact one of your subject headers was
about your "SO's trailer home". Your words greggie.
Anyone who can see the photos of the homes and street as shown on
Google Maps would know that the residence in question is clearly not
a trailer home. The houses to the left of that residence have the same
shotgun style, so I'd thought it'd be funny if I called it a trailer
park just to see what you would say.
Interesting that you started doing the yowling about it NOT being a
trailer park AFTER I revealed my trick.
Now that I've got you all excited and drooling about your thoughts of
" getting" me, have you actually managed to work Google Maps so you
CAN see the photos yet Greggie?
Or do you need a grade schooler to show you how to do it?
Cite where I " troll" for " bloodplay" Yukkie. Surely you have a URL
to prove yoru claims.
And no I am not a " vampire wannabe". I am a fan of the genre, period.
I live in reality.
How's your anti-Semitism coming along Yukkie? Fan of David Duke yet?
Agreed.
What amuses me is that he's not claiming to live in the two story
house to the right of the residence shown at the address, the one with
the long driveway between the homes.
I'm sure whomever made this Google Maps entry photo array was a bit
off the correct "spot" because the actual array used indicates the
address is just a little off center on the driveway. Now unless there
is a shack hidden behind the garage whee the vehicle is, Greg would be
living in the shotgun house next door.
If the vehicle in the photo is a recent Caddie, Greg can't afford
that so obviously the two story home is not his. Um I mean his " SO".
For the price of a new Caddie you can get two normal well maintained
classic ones plus money left over for the usual replacement parts.