What forced ken pangborn to chnge his claims about his education and "certification" with the ASTC on the a-team website?
Dan Sullivan
"Mr. Pangborn has a BA degree in Child Development and a Master of
Science Degree in Child Psychology". (Cum Laude)
Now ken pangborn claims...
"Mr. Pangborn has a BA degree in Child Development (Cum Laude) and a
Master of Science Degree in Psychology".
pangborn used to claim...
"Mr. Pangborn is a certified member of the American Society of Trial
Consultants..."
Now ken pangborn claims...
"Mr. Pangborn is a long standing member of the American Society of
Trial Consultants..."
Who and what forced ken pangborn to make those corrections?
krp
"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:ac6649b4-0b4c-44ec...@p32g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
YOU DID LORD SITH! Keep telling yourself that while I laugh my ass off
at you Sullivan. Again you suffer from some DELUSION that I owe you
explanations for my life. I don't!
\
Dan Sullivan
"krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:4af7418d$0$4971$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com...
>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:ac6649b4-0b4c-44ec...@p32g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
>
>> This is what ken pangborn used to claim...
>>
>> "Mr. Pangborn has a BA degree in Child Development and a Master of
>> Science Degree in Child Psychology". (Cum Laude)
>>
>> Now ken pangborn claims...
>> "Mr. Pangborn has a BA degree in Child Development (Cum Laude) and a
>> Master of Science Degree in Psychology".
>>
>> pangborn used to claim...
>> "Mr. Pangborn is a certified member of the American Society of Trial
>> Consultants..."
>>
>> Now ken pangborn claims...
>> "Mr. Pangborn is a long standing member of the American Society of
>> Trial Consultants..."
>>
>> Who and what forced ken pangborn to make those corrections?
<<<snip ken's usual BS>>>
Just as long as pangborn keeps jumping thru the hoops.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>news:ac6649b4-0b4c-44ec...@p32g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
>
>> This is what ken pangborn used to claim...
>>
>> "Mr. Pangborn has a BA degree in Child Development and a Master of
>> Science Degree in Child Psychology". (Cum Laude)
>>
>> Now ken pangborn claims...
>> "Mr. Pangborn has a BA degree in Child Development (Cum Laude) and a
>> Master of Science Degree in Psychology".
>>
>> pangborn used to claim...
>> "Mr. Pangborn is a certified member of the American Society of Trial
>> Consultants..."
>>
>> Now ken pangborn claims...
>> "Mr. Pangborn is a long standing member of the American Society of
>> Trial Consultants..."
>>
>> Who and what forced ken pangborn to make those corrections?
>
> YOU DID LORD SITH!
Did Dan expose your fraud? Unless you're being far less than
honest, you've just admitted he did.
>Keep telling yourself that while I laugh my ass off
>at you Sullivan. Again you suffer from some DELUSION that I owe you
>explanations for my life. I don't!
You do owe the people who hired you in the past, in part due to
your clearly bogus claims, just why you made the claims in the past,
and are now RUNNING from them.
"Quotes below have been highly altered."
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn accidentally admitting in misc.legal
that he alters posts when he replies.
Greegor
Yeah, you're really turning up the heat! (Yawn!)
krp
"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:89c6fdf4-ab25-4b74...@p35g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> DJS3 > Just as long as pangborn keeps jumping thru the hoops.
>
> Yeah, you're really turning up the heat! (Yawn!)
He needs to change his name to "LARRY LOOPHOLE."
Dan Sullivan
> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
You need to fix more errors on your website, pangborn.
Unless you have a valid excuse for leaving the errors.
Dan Sullivan
You need to fix more errors on your website, pangborn.
Greegor
G > Yeah, you're really turning up the heat! (Yawn!)
KRP > He needs to change his name to "LARRY LOOPHOLE."
DJS3 > You need to fix more errors on your website, pangborn.
DJS3 > Unless you have a valid excuse for leaving the errors.
You thought it was so good you'd post it twice, Right Dan?
8:37am and 9:18am ?
Now you're REALLY turning up the heat! LOL
womanGoddess
> "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>
> news:4af7418d$0$4971$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> >news:ac6649b4-0b4c-44ec...@p32g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> This is what ken pangborn used to claim...
>
> >> "Mr. Pangborn has a BA degree in Child Development and a Master of
> >> Science Degree in Child Psychology". (Cum Laude)
>
> >> Now ken pangborn claims...
> >> "Mr. Pangborn has a BA degree in Child Development (Cum Laude) and a
> >> Master of Science Degree in Psychology".
>
> >> pangborn used to claim...
> >> "Mr. Pangborn is a certified member of the American Society of Trial
> >> Consultants..."
>
> >> Now ken pangborn claims...
> >> "Mr. Pangborn is a long standing member of the American Society of
> >> Trial Consultants..."
>
> >> Who and what forced ken pangborn to make those corrections?
>
> <<<snip ken's usual BS>>>
>
> Just as long as pangborn keeps jumping thru the hoops.
Which is just about as much exercise as he ever gets.
Aside from puking while drunk, that is.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
krp
On Nov 10, 5:18 am, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:89c6fdf4-ab25-4b74...@p35g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
>
> > DJS3 > Just as long as pangborn keeps jumping thru the hoops.
>
> > Yeah, you're really turning up the heat! (Yawn!)
>
> He needs to change his name to "LARRY LOOPHOLE."
DJS#3> You need to fix more errors on your website, pangborn.Unless you have
a valid excuse for leaving the errors.
Says WHO? YOU? Bwahahahahahahahaha! Like I should replace "MANIFOLD" with
your "MANYFOLD?" PUHLEEEEZE give us another ENGLISH LESSON HERR
PROFESSOR!!!!
Dan Sullivan
>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:70faf207-fb20-46b1...@m35g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
> On Nov 10, 5:18 am, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:89c6fdf4-ab25-4b74...@p35g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > DJS3 > Just as long as pangborn keeps jumping thru the hoops.
>>
>> > Yeah, you're really turning up the heat! (Yawn!)
>>
>> He needs to change his name to "LARRY LOOPHOLE."
>
> DJS#3> You need to fix more errors on your website, pangborn.Unless you
> have a valid excuse for leaving the errors.
>
> Says WHO? YOU?
That's the response I was expecting from you, pangborn.
Leave the errors and prospective clients will see the quality of the "facts"
you post about yourself.
Greegor
G > Yeah, you're really turning up the heat! (Yawn!)
KRP > He needs to change his name to "LARRY LOOPHOLE."
DJS#3 > You need to fix more errors on your website,
DJS#3 > pangborn.Unless you have a valid excuse
DJS#3 > for leaving the errors.
Dan pretends with an "aire" of authority!
KRP > Says WHO? YOU? Bwahahahahahahahaha!
KRP > Like I should replace "MANIFOLD" with your
KRP > "MANYFOLD?" PUHLEEEEZE give us another
KRP > ENGLISH LESSON HERR PROFESSOR!!!!
Yes, What would a LITERATE PERSON make of Dan's exhortation?
womanGoddess
if you want a literate person, that leaves Kennie out.
And you as well.
krp
>>> > DJS3 > Just as long as pangborn keeps jumping thru the hoops.
>>>
>>> > Yeah, you're really turning up the heat! (Yawn!)
>>>
>>> He needs to change his name to "LARRY LOOPHOLE."
>>
>> DJS#3> You need to fix more errors on your website, pangborn.Unless you
>> have a valid excuse for leaving the errors.
>>
>> Says WHO? YOU?
> That's the response I was expecting from you, pangborn.
Really? In your PROFESSORIAL opinion, tell ujs what all those "ERRORS"
are Dasnny boy. Just in your EXPERT opininion.
> Leave the errors and prospective clients will see the quality of the
> "facts" you post about yourself.
Hmmm - REALLY? Like all the REALLY BIG ones like you exposed so far?
Such as your EXPOSING that I was "kicked out" of ASTC "because of my racism
and misogyny?" That YOU claimed to have the PROOF on? Small problem
DICKHEAD is that I was STILL a member! Hmmm so much for your INFALLIBLE
ACCURACY so far, DANNY BOY! Oh yes and how you corrected me so LOUDLY for
using the word "MANIFOLD" when YOU KNEW it HAD to be "MANYFOLD!" Shit like
THAT Danny? You have me so worried I am doing a Davey Moore and pissing all
over the floor.
Danny you have been TRYING for TWO YEARS to get something ON me. Like my
alleged MASSIVE CRIMINAL HISTORY - say Danny, how did THAT ONE work out for
ya? Was it the SMOKING GUN you SAID it was going to be? Well - weenie? RUN
DANNY RUN. SEE DANNY RUN!
Danny when are YOU going to share with the world a list of YOUR great
accomplishments in life? You're almost 62 now, right Sullivan? Other than
your bullshit claims on Usenet, can you name ONE THING that you consider you
have done to make your life worth while? Just ONE positive accomplishment?
ONE- Danny - JUST ONE!
krp
DJS3 > Just as long as pangborn keeps jumping thru the hoops.
G > Yeah, you're really turning up the heat! (Yawn!)
KRP > He needs to change his name to "LARRY LOOPHOLE."
DJS#3 > You need to fix more errors on your website,
DJS#3 > pangborn.Unless you have a valid excuse
DJS#3 > for leaving the errors.
GH> Dan pretends with an "aire" of authority!
KRP > Says WHO? YOU? Bwahahahahahahahaha!
KRP > Like I should replace "MANIFOLD" with your
KRP > "MANYFOLD?" PUHLEEEEZE give us another
KRP > ENGLISH LESSON HERR PROFESSOR!!!!
GH> Yes, What would a LITERATE PERSON make of Dan's exhortation?
Danny HOWLED for almost a month that I inproperly used the word
"manifold" which HE CLAIMS is only used to refer to an automobile part. That
in his EXPERT OPINION and an English linguistic EEXPERT. ALl the BLUSTER
that the "CORRECT" word and the ONLY correct word would have beeen
"MANYFOLD" to refer to "numerous" He thinks he has me "jumping through
hoops" for him, he is truly a legend in his own mind. He claims toi be
getting THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of clients from ASCPS who choose him over me
because of his MASSIVE knowledge and how he shoots me down all the time.
Funny, they don't seem to be posting ON ASCPS this GREAT PRIASE for his
MANYFOLD TALENTS. <snicker> Danny goes in the bathroom and starts singing
his Michael Jackson song... "Ime BAD, I'M BAD".... believing he is SUPERMAN!
Just think - a copuple of years ago it was KING SULLIVAN the ruler of ASCPS.
He controlled the discussions and was the MASTER of the group. Everyone
genuflected before him. Not so much any more, huh? LONG LIVE THE KING!
Greegor
> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Moe thinks she's ""helping"" him!
Isn't that cute? LOL
krp
> DJS3 > Just as long as pangborn keeps jumping thru the hoops.
>
> G > Yeah, you're really turning up the heat! (Yawn!)
>
> KRP > He needs to change his name to "LARRY LOOPHOLE."
>
> DJS#3 > You need to fix more errors on your website,
> DJS#3 > pangborn.Unless you have a valid excuse
> DJS#3 > for leaving the errors.
>
> GH> Dan pretends with an "aire" of authority!
>
> KRP > Says WHO? YOU? Bwahahahahahahahaha!
> KRP > Like I should replace "MANIFOLD" with your
> KRP > "MANYFOLD?" PUHLEEEEZE give us another
> KRP > ENGLISH LESSON HERR PROFESSOR!!!!
>
> GH> Yes, What would a LITERATE PERSON make of Dan's exhortation?
>
> Danny HOWLED for almost a month that I improperly used the word
> "manifold" which HE CLAIMS is only used to refer to an automobile part.
> That
> in his EXPERT OPINION and an English linguistic EEXPERT. ALl the BLUSTER
> that the "CORRECT" word and the ONLY correct word would have beeen
> "MANYFOLD" to refer to "numerous" He thinks he has me "jumping through
> hoops" for him, he is truly a legend in his own mind. He claims toi be
> getting THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of clients from ASCPS who choose him over
> me
> because of his MASSIVE knowledge and how he shoots me down all the time.
> Funny, they don't seem to be posting ON ASCPS this GREAT PRIASE for his
> MANYFOLD TALENTS. <snicker> Danny goes in the bathroom and starts singing
> his Michael Jackson song... "Ime BAD, I'M BAD".... believing he is
> SUPERMAN!
> Just think - a copuple of years ago it was KING SULLIVAN the ruler of
> ASCPS.
> He controlled the discussions and was the MASTER of the group. Everyone
> genuflected before him. Not so much any more, huh? LONG LIVE THE KING!
GH> Moe thinks she's ""helping"" him! Isn't that cute? LOL
It's rather special. As in "Isn't that Special" from the Church Lady on
SNL. Sullivan remains a LEGEND IN HIS OWN MIND as do the others in the gang
of 4.
Dan Sullivan
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>
> news:4afad174$0$4988$607e...@cv.net...
>
> >>> > DJS3 > Just as long as pangborn keeps jumping thru the hoops.
>
> >>> > Yeah, you're really turning up the heat! (Yawn!)
>
> >>> He needs to change his name to "LARRY LOOPHOLE."
>
> >> DJS#3> You need to fix more errors on your website, pangborn.Unless you
> >> have a valid excuse for leaving the errors.
>
> >> Says WHO? YOU?
> > That's the response I was expecting from you, pangborn.
>
> Really? In your PROFESSORIAL opinion, tell ujs what all those "ERRORS"
> are Dasnny boy. Just in your EXPERT opininion.
I already posted a number of your errors and you've corrected a few.
Fix the ones I listed but still remain uncorrected.
Then I'll post more of your "errors."
> > Leave the errors and prospective clients will see the quality of the
> > "facts" you post about yourself.
>
> Hmmm - REALLY? Like all the REALLY BIG ones like you exposed so far?
You've corrected a number of errors I pointed out a while ago,
pangborn.
> Such as your EXPOSING that I was "kicked out" of ASTC "because of my racism
> and misogyny?" That YOU claimed to have the PROOF on?
I never said any of that.
> Small problem
> DICKHEAD is that I was STILL a member! Hmmm so much for your INFALLIBLE
> ACCURACY so far, DANNY BOY!
Your failed to renew your membership in the ASTC until someone pointed
out you were no longer listed as a member.
The same thing happened last year.
Greegor
Dan Sullivan
Greegor
Dan Sullivan
> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:21f00c9d-054e-4d05...@m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>
> DJS3 > Just as long as pangborn keeps jumping thru the hoops.
>
> G > Yeah, you're really turning up the heat! (Yawn!)
>
> KRP > He needs to change his name to "LARRY LOOPHOLE."
>
> DJS#3 > You need to fix more errors on your website,
> DJS#3 > pangborn.Unless you have a valid excuse
> DJS#3 > for leaving the errors.
>
> GH> Dan pretends with an "aire" of authority!
>
> KRP > Says WHO? YOU? Bwahahahahahahahaha!
> KRP > Like I should replace "MANIFOLD" with your
> KRP > "MANYFOLD?" PUHLEEEEZE give us another
> KRP > ENGLISH LESSON HERR PROFESSOR!!!!
>
> GH> Yes, What would a LITERATE PERSON make of Dan's exhortation?
>
> Danny HOWLED for almost a month that I inproperly used the word
> "manifold" which HE CLAIMS is only used to refer to an automobile part.
First I made one post on May 17, 2009, regarding the use of the word
manyfold.
How does a single post become "almost a month?"
And I never claimed the word manifold is only used to refer to an
automobile part.
The following is the entire post of mine regarding the word
manyfold...
==================
ken pangborn of the a-team claims he has a master's degree from a
university... an unnamed university.
From the a-team website "THE WRONG TRACK," how appropriate!
http://www.a-team.org/the_wrong_track.html
First sentence, second paragreph...
"The problems with this process are manifold."
MANIFOLD???
Like from a car or truck engine?
Don't you think someone who supposedly had a REAL UNIVERSITY education
would know how to spell man-Y-fold, correctly?
Is it any wonder ken pangborn won't say which university he went to?
=================
> That
> in his EXPERT OPINION and an English linguistic EEXPERT. ALl the BLUSTER
> that the "CORRECT" word and the ONLY correct word would have beeen
> "MANYFOLD" to refer to "numerous"
Manyfold does mean "by many times."
> He thinks he has me "jumping through
> hoops" for him, he is truly a legend in his own mind. He claims toi be
> getting THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of clients from ASCPS who choose him over me
> because of his MASSIVE knowledge and how he shoots me down all the time.
You shoot yourself down, pangborn, by posting your ridiculous lies and
exaggerations, like your message I'm responding to.
Greegor
Dan, What would a LITERATE person say?
DJS3 > The following is the entire post of
DJS3 > mine regarding the word manyfold...
==================
DJS3 > ken pangborn of the a-team claims he has a
DJS3 > master's degree from a university... an
DJS3 > unnamed university.
DJS3 >
DJS3 > From the a-team website "THE WRONG TRACK," how appropriate!
http://www.a-team.org/the_wrong_track.html
DJS3 > First sentence, second paragreph...
"The problems with this process are manifold."
DJS3 > MANIFOLD???
DJS3 >
DJS3 > Like from a car or truck engine?
DJS3 >
DJS3 > Don't you think someone who supposedly
DJS3 > had a REAL UNIVERSITY education
DJS3 > would know how to spell man-Y-fold, correctly?
DJS3 >
DJS3 > Is it any wonder ken pangborn won't say which university he
went to?
=================
Dan Sullivan
Greegor
DJS3 > MANIFOLD???
DJS3 > Like from a car or truck engine?
Dan Sullivan
> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:21f00c9d-054e-4d05...@m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> DJS3 > Just as long as pangborn keeps jumping thru the hoops.
> G > Yeah, you're really turning up the heat! (Yawn!)
> KRP > He needs to change his name to "LARRY LOOPHOLE."
> DJS#3 > You need to fix more errors on your website,
> DJS#3 > pangborn.Unless you have a valid excuse
> DJS#3 > for leaving the errors.
> GH> Dan pretends with an "aire" of authority!
> KRP > Says WHO? YOU? Bwahahahahahahahaha!
> KRP > Like I should replace "MANIFOLD" with your
> KRP > "MANYFOLD?" PUHLEEEEZE give us another
> KRP > ENGLISH LESSON HERR PROFESSOR!!!!
> GH> Yes, What would a LITERATE PERSON make of Dan's exhortation?
> Danny HOWLED for almost a month that I inproperly used the word
> "manifold" which HE CLAIMS is only used to refer to an automobile part.
First, I made one post on May 17, 2009, regarding the use of the word
krp
> >>> > DJS3 > Just as long as pangborn keeps jumping thru the hoops.
>
> >>> > Yeah, you're really turning up the heat! (Yawn!)
>
> >>> He needs to change his name to "LARRY LOOPHOLE."
>
> >> DJS#3> You need to fix more errors on your website, pangborn.Unless you
> >> have a valid excuse for leaving the errors.
>
> >> Says WHO? YOU?
> > That's the response I was expecting from you, pangborn.
>
> Really? In your PROFESSORIAL opinion, tell us what all those "ERRORS"
> are Danny boy. Just in your EXPERT opininion.
DJS#3> I already posted a number of your errors and you've corrected a few.
Yes like your HOWLING at me using the the word "MANIFOLD" and you keep
INSISTING that it MUST be "Manyfold." Of course the more you insist the
goofier you appear to everyone.
DJS#3> Fix the ones I listed but still remain uncorrected. Then I'll post
more of your "errors."
Sullivan - just WHO the fukkk do you think you are?
> Such as your EXPOSING that I was "kicked out" of ASTC "because of my
> racism
> and misogyny?" That YOU claimed to have the PROOF on?
DJS#3> I never said any of that.
SURE you did, LIAR!!!!!!
> Small problem DICKHEAD is that I was STILL a member! Hmmm so much for your
> INFALLIBLE
> ACCURACY so far, DANNY BOY!
DJS#3> Your failed to renew your membership in the ASTC until someone
pointed
DJS#3> out you were no longer listed as a member.
You suffer some psychological delusion that making wild claims is
"pointing out" FACTS you dipshit! All it is in reality is your gang of 4
BELLOWING BULLSHIT! Show us your "ABSOLUTE PROOF" that I didn't renew my
membership. You suggest you have it - BULLSHITTER. Let's see it.
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!
krp
>
> DJS3 > Just as long as pangborn keeps jumping thru the hoops.
>
> G > Yeah, you're really turning up the heat! (Yawn!)
>
> KRP > He needs to change his name to "LARRY LOOPHOLE."
>
> DJS#3 > You need to fix more errors on your website,
> DJS#3 > pangborn.Unless you have a valid excuse
> DJS#3 > for leaving the errors.
>
> GH> Dan pretends with an "aire" of authority!
>
> KRP > Says WHO? YOU? Bwahahahahahahahaha!
> KRP > Like I should replace "MANIFOLD" with your
> KRP > "MANYFOLD?" PUHLEEEEZE give us another
> KRP > ENGLISH LESSON HERR PROFESSOR!!!!
>
> GH> Yes, What would a LITERATE PERSON make of Dan's exhortation?
>
> Danny HOWLED for almost a month that I inproperly used the word
> "manifold" which HE CLAIMS is only used to refer to an automobile part.
DJS#3> First I made one post on May 17, 2009, regarding the use of the word
manyfold.
You made FAR more than ONE POST, Sullivan. But since your posts were so
STUPIDLY INCORRECT, I can understand your need for "damage control."
DJS#3> and I never claimed the word manifold is only used to refer to an
DJS#3> automobile part. The following is the entire post of mine regarding
the word
DJS#3> manyfold...
==================
ken pangborn of the a-team claims he has a master's degree from a
university... an unnamed university.
From the a-team website "THE WRONG TRACK," how appropriate!
http://www.a-team.org/the_wrong_track.html
First sentence, second paragreph...
"The problems with this process are manifold."
MANIFOLD???
Like from a car or truck engine?
Don't you think someone who supposedly had a REAL UNIVERSITY education
would know how to spell man-Y-fold, correctly?
Is it any wonder ken pangborn won't say which university he went to?
=================
Sure I know how to spell MANYFOLD, Dipshit. But the CORRECT WORD was
"MANIFOLD."
> That in his EXPERT OPINION and an English linguistic EXPERT. All the
> BLUSTER
> that the "CORRECT" word and the ONLY correct word would have beeen
> "MANYFOLD" to refer to "numerous"
DJS#3> Manyfold does mean "by many times."
I just LOVE IT when you get into one of your SANCTIMONIOUS RAGES,
Sullivan.
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/results.asp?searchword=manyfold
Results for manyfold
manyfold was not found in the Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary
Of course the folks at Cambridge are STUPID and only the GREAT DANNY
SULLIVAN commands the English language, Right Danny?
Just about every authority I know on the English language who has been
asked has said that the use of "manifold" in the sentence was proper and the
use of the word "manyfold" would NOT be. So far you exist by your itty
bitty self and continue to appear increasingly STUPID, Sullivan.
Dan Sullivan
>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:3cddbbd7-7531-40b8...@1g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> DJS3 > Just as long as pangborn keeps jumping thru the hoops.
>>
>> G > Yeah, you're really turning up the heat! (Yawn!)
>>
>> KRP > He needs to change his name to "LARRY LOOPHOLE."
>>
>> DJS#3 > You need to fix more errors on your website,
>> DJS#3 > pangborn.Unless you have a valid excuse
>> DJS#3 > for leaving the errors.
>>
>> GH> Dan pretends with an "aire" of authority!
>>
>> KRP > Says WHO? YOU? Bwahahahahahahahaha!
>> KRP > Like I should replace "MANIFOLD" with your
>> KRP > "MANYFOLD?" PUHLEEEEZE give us another
>> KRP > ENGLISH LESSON HERR PROFESSOR!!!!
>>
>> GH> Yes, What would a LITERATE PERSON make of Dan's exhortation?
>>
>> Danny HOWLED for almost a month that I inproperly used the word
>> "manifold" which HE CLAIMS is only used to refer to an automobile part.
>
> DJS#3> First I made one post on May 17, 2009, regarding the use of the
> word manyfold.
>
> You made FAR more than ONE POST, Sullivan.
Sure I have, but only the one regarding the use of the word manyfold.
krp
>>>
>>> DJS3 > Just as long as pangborn keeps jumping thru the hoops.
>>>
>>> G > Yeah, you're really turning up the heat! (Yawn!)
>>>
>>> KRP > He needs to change his name to "LARRY LOOPHOLE."
>>>
>>> DJS#3 > You need to fix more errors on your website,
>>> DJS#3 > pangborn.Unless you have a valid excuse
>>> DJS#3 > for leaving the errors.
>>>
>>> GH> Dan pretends with an "aire" of authority!
>>>
>>> KRP > Says WHO? YOU? Bwahahahahahahahaha!
>>> KRP > Like I should replace "MANIFOLD" with your
>>> KRP > "MANYFOLD?" PUHLEEEEZE give us another
>>> KRP > ENGLISH LESSON HERR PROFESSOR!!!!
>>>
>>> GH> Yes, What would a LITERATE PERSON make of Dan's exhortation?
>>>
>>> Danny HOWLED for almost a month that I inproperly used the word
>>> "manifold" which HE CLAIMS is only used to refer to an automobile part.
>>
>> DJS#3> First I made one post on May 17, 2009, regarding the use of the
>> word manyfold.
>>
>> You made FAR more than ONE POST, Sullivan.
> Sure I have, but only the one regarding the use of the word manyfold.
But MANY claiming that the use of the word "MANIFOLD" was wrong. I
repeatedly have proved YOU WRONG on the subject. Laughably WRONG!
Dan Sullivan
Not true, prove otherwise.
Dan Sullivan
> COULDN'T BE MORE WRONG MANYFOLDLY"Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
BTW, pangborn, changing the subject to "more MANYFOLD" is redundant.
It's like saying ken pangborn is a lying, third-rate hack of a trial
consultant.
krp
> >>> DJS3 > Just as long as pangborn keeps jumping thru the hoops.
>
> >>> G > Yeah, you're really turning up the heat! (Yawn!)
>
> >>> KRP > He needs to change his name to "LARRY LOOPHOLE."
>
> >>> DJS#3 > You need to fix more errors on your website,
> >>> DJS#3 > pangborn.Unless you have a valid excuse
> >>> DJS#3 > for leaving the errors.
>
> >>> GH> Dan pretends with an "aire" of authority!
>
> >>> KRP > Says WHO? YOU? Bwahahahahahahahaha!
> >>> KRP > Like I should replace "MANIFOLD" with your
> >>> KRP > "MANYFOLD?" PUHLEEEEZE give us another
> >>> KRP > ENGLISH LESSON HERR PROFESSOR!!!!
>
> >>> GH> Yes, What would a LITERATE PERSON make of Dan's exhortation?
>
> >>> Danny HOWLED for almost a month that I inproperly used the word
> >>> "manifold" which HE CLAIMS is only used to refer to an automobile
> >>> part.
>
> >> DJS#3> First I made one post on May 17, 2009, regarding the use of the
> >> word manyfold.
>
> >> You made FAR more than ONE POST, Sullivan.
> > Sure I have, but only the one regarding the use of the word manyfold.
>
> But MANY claiming that the use of the word "MANIFOLD" was wrong. I
> repeatedly have proved YOU WRONG on the subject. Laughably WRONG!
DJS#3> BTW, pangborn, changing the subject to "more MANYFOLD" is redundant.
What's the matter Danny - CANNOT admit you were wrong? YOU being the
loudmouth here used my use of the word "manifold" as one of your examples of
the ERRORS you claimed to have found on my website. A "HUGE ONE" you once
said. But you were full of shit AS USUAL!!!!
krp
>>>>> DJS3 > Just as long as pangborn keeps jumping thru the hoops.
>>>>>
>>>>> G > Yeah, you're really turning up the heat! (Yawn!)
>>>>>
>>>>> KRP > He needs to change his name to "LARRY LOOPHOLE."
>>>>>
>>>>> DJS#3 > You need to fix more errors on your website,
>>>>> DJS#3 > pangborn.Unless you have a valid excuse
>>>>> DJS#3 > for leaving the errors.
>>>>>
>>>>> GH> Dan pretends with an "aire" of authority!
>>>>>
>>>>> KRP > Says WHO? YOU? Bwahahahahahahahaha!
>>>>> KRP > Like I should replace "MANIFOLD" with your
>>>>> KRP > "MANYFOLD?" PUHLEEEEZE give us another
>>>>> KRP > ENGLISH LESSON HERR PROFESSOR!!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> GH> Yes, What would a LITERATE PERSON make of Dan's exhortation?
>>>>>
>>>>> Danny HOWLED for almost a month that I inproperly used the word
>>>>> "manifold" which HE CLAIMS is only used to refer to an automobile
>>>>> part.
>>>>
>>>> DJS#3> First I made one post on May 17, 2009, regarding the use of the
>>>> word manyfold.
>>>>
>>>> You made FAR more than ONE POST, Sullivan.
>>
>>> Sure I have, but only the one regarding the use of the word manyfold.
>>
>> But MANY claiming that the use of the word "MANIFOLD" was wrong.
>
> Not true, prove otherwise.
Christ, Sullivan you are DAMN stupid. You were just HOWLING about it
again this morning about how it should be "MANYFOLD" Danny - you're a
fukkking NUT!
Dan Sullivan
That's another nickel for ya, pangborn.
Dan Sullivan
More of pangborn's lies.
krp
Sullivan the LIES are yours not mind. Your MANIFOLD lies. You still
cannot admit you were wrong about it being MANYFOLD and not MANIFOLD.
You're a BOOB, Sullivan and the more you argue the more you PROVE IT!
Dan Sullivan
Post what I said that were lies about manyfold.
If you don't, and I KNOW you can't, you will again be proven a liar,
pangborn.
krp
YOU posted the proof this morning. I'm NOT your "fetchit" puppy
Danny.It's there and NOBODY outside your gang of 4 believes you.
krp
>>>>>>> DJS3 > Just as long as pangborn keeps jumping thru the hoops.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> G > Yeah, you're really turning up the heat! (Yawn!)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> KRP > He needs to change his name to "LARRY LOOPHOLE."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> DJS#3 > You need to fix more errors on your website,
>>>>>>> DJS#3 > pangborn.Unless you have a valid excuse
>>>>>>> DJS#3 > for leaving the errors.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> GH> Dan pretends with an "aire" of authority!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> KRP > Says WHO? YOU? Bwahahahahahahahaha!
>>>>>>> KRP > Like I should replace "MANIFOLD" with your
>>>>>>> KRP > "MANYFOLD?" PUHLEEEEZE give us another
>>>>>>> KRP > ENGLISH LESSON HERR PROFESSOR!!!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> GH> Yes, What would a LITERATE PERSON make of Dan's exhortation?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Danny HOWLED for almost a month that I inproperly used the word
>>>>>>> "manifold" which HE CLAIMS is only used to refer to an automobile
>>>>>>> part.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> DJS#3> First I made one post on May 17, 2009, regarding the use of
>>>>>> the word manyfold.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You made FAR more than ONE POST, Sullivan.
>>>>
>>>>> Sure I have, but only the one regarding the use of the word manyfold.
>>>>
>>>> But MANY claiming that the use of the word "MANIFOLD" was wrong.
>>>
>>> Not true, prove otherwise.
>>
>> Christ, Sullivan you are DAMN stupid. You were just HOWLING about it
>> again this morning about how it should be "MANYFOLD"
> That's another nickel for ya, pangborn.
Sorry Danny. Your bullshit is no longer selling. Where is your following
of worshippers in ASCPS now Danny? Your sycophants that hung on your every
word as if they came from a burning bush? They don't seem to be around any
more. What happened? You KILLED the newsgroup and now it is all about you
and the gang of 4 attacking myself and Greg. You have destroyed your
audience, Danny boy. You drove it straight out of the theater.
Enos Penvy
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
You shouldn't be so disrespectful to your pwner.
Greegor
"manifold" on Ken's site is incorrect word usage?
Do you think the word manifold is ONLY an automotive term?
Why do you think the word choice was wrong and
should have been "manyfold"?
Dan Sullivan
A I said, which you deleted, "If you don't (post the proof), and I KNOW you
can't, you will again be proven a liar,
pangborn.
> I'm NOT your "fetchit" puppy Danny.
But you ARE my "fetchit" puppy, pangborn.
Dan Sullivan
>
> Dan, Do you REALLY still think that the word
> "manifold" on Ken's site is incorrect word usage?
Is that what I said?
> Do you think the word manifold is ONLY an automotive term?
Is that what I said?
> Why do you think the word choice was wrong and
> should have been "manyfold"?
Is that what I said?
krp
"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f7bf32a0-9610-4641...@k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
Only yesterday morning, Danny was HOWLING that MANYFOLD is the ONLY
proper word.
krp
On Nov 13, 6:46 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dan, Do you REALLY still think that the word
> "manifold" on Ken's site is incorrect word usage?
DJS#3> Is that what I said?
It is PRECISELY what you claimed.
> Do you think the word manifold is ONLY an automotive term?
DJS#3> Is that what I said?
Pretty much what you said, yes.
> Why do you think the word choice was wrong and
> should have been "manyfold"?
DJS#3> Is that what I said?
It *IS* what you LOUDLY and repeatedly claimed even yesterday. Danny -
don't look now but the whole world knows you are an "ASS!" You couldn't
have been more wrong if you were working on making a fool of yourself.
krp
Look asshole, why do I have to go post PROOF when you contin ue to
reapeat youir INSANE BULLSHIT?
>> I'm NOT your "fetchit" puppy Danny.
> But you ARE my "fetchit" puppy, pangborn.
Dream on whack job! You are suffering from your delusions of adequacy
again.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>>If you don't, and I KNOW you can't, you will again be proven a liar,
>>pangborn.
>
> YOU posted the proof this morning. I'm NOT your "fetchit" puppy
>Danny.It's there and NOBODY outside your gang of 4 believes you.
>
You admission that you were lying is accepted.
Thank you.
"you are reading Moore's SELECTIVE material that is HIGHLY edited."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn claiming in misc.legal that David Moore can
and does edit Google's Usenet archive.
Message-ID: <n9Sfm.1372$nh2...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>
Kent Wills
wrote:
[...]
>>>> Not true, prove otherwise.
>>>
>>> Christ, Sullivan you are DAMN stupid. You were just HOWLING about it
>>> again this morning about how it should be "MANYFOLD"
>
>> That's another nickel for ya, pangborn.
>
> Sorry Danny. Your bullshit is no longer selling. Where is your following
>of worshippers in ASCPS now Danny? Your sycophants that hung on your every
>word as if they came from a burning bush? They don't seem to be around any
>more. What happened? You KILLED the newsgroup and now it is all about you
>and the gang of 4 attacking myself and Greg.
Just as Greg wanted and wants.
He has worked hard to ensure that people who need help dealing
with CPS can't get it via the newsgroup. Greg wants CPS to win 100%
of the time.
>You have destroyed your
>audience, Danny boy. You drove it straight out of the theater.
Why do you lie?
"(CONTEXT REMOVED AS TO THE BELOW CLAIM)"
Kenneth Robert Pangborn admitting he alters the context of posts
when he replies.
MID FyUom.1363$Jd7....@nwrddc02.gnilink.net
Dan Sullivan
>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:7fc32f66-7fe9-4c42...@p33g2000vbn.googlegroups.com...
> On Nov 13, 6:46 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dan, Do you REALLY still think that the word
>> "manifold" on Ken's site is incorrect word usage?
>
> DJS#3> Is that what I said?
>
> It is PRECISELY what you claimed.
That's not true.
Prove otherwise.
>> Do you think the word manifold is ONLY an automotive term?
>
> DJS#3> Is that what I said?
>
> Pretty much what you said, yes.
That's not true.
>> Why do you think the word choice was wrong and
>> should have been "manyfold"?
>
> DJS#3> Is that what I said?
>
> It *IS* what you LOUDLY and repeatedly claimed even yesterday.
That's not true.
Pay yourself 15 cents, pangborn.
krp
>> On Nov 13, 6:46 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Dan, Do you REALLY still think that the word
>>> "manifold" on Ken's site is incorrect word usage?
>>
>> DJS#3> Is that what I said?
>>
>> It is PRECISELY what you claimed.
> That's not true. Prove otherwise.
You keep proving it every time you post your "MANFOLD" bullshit,
Sullivan.
>>> Do you think the word manifold is ONLY an automotive term?
>
>> DJS#3> Is that what I said?
>> Pretty much what you said, yes.
> That's not true.
Unfortunately for you, you quoted yourself saying EXACTLY that
yesterday.
>>> Why do you think the word choice was wrong and
>>> should have been "manyfold"?
>>
>> DJS#3> Is that what I said?
>>
>> It *IS* what you LOUDLY and repeatedly claimed even yesterday.
> That's not true.
Danny - let me ask you. Do you REALLY REALLY REALLY expect the whole
world to have amnesia? Do you think regular readers have forgotten what you
said yesterday?
Here is the simple FACT, Sullivan, the use of the word "MANIFOLD" is
correct. Your claim that the correct word is "manyfold" is plain BULLSHIT!
Dan Sullivan
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>
> news:4afebf7b$0$4983$607e...@cv.net...
>
> >> On Nov 13, 6:46 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Dan, Do you REALLY still think that the word
> >>> "manifold" on Ken's site is incorrect word usage?
>
> >> DJS#3> Is that what I said?
>
> >> It is PRECISELY what you claimed.
> > That's not true. Prove otherwise.
>
> You keep proving it every time you post your "MANFOLD" bullshit,
> Sullivan.
>
> >>> Do you think the word manifold is ONLY an automotive term?
>
> >> DJS#3> Is that what I said?
> >> Pretty much what you said, yes.
> > That's not true.
>
> Unfortunately for you, you quoted yourself saying EXACTLY that
> yesterday.
No, that's not true.
> >>> Why do you think the word choice was wrong and
> >>> should have been "manyfold"?
>
> >> DJS#3> Is that what I said?
>
> >> It *IS* what you LOUDLY and repeatedly claimed even yesterday.
> > That's not true.
>
> Danny - let me ask you. Do you REALLY REALLY REALLY expect the whole
> world to have amnesia? Do you think regular readers have forgotten what you
> said yesterday?
>
> Here is the simple FACT, Sullivan, the use of the word "MANIFOLD" is
> correct. Your claim that the correct word is "manyfold" is plain BULLSHIT!
I never said manyfold is the correct word.
Greegor
I see you're taking the high road, for you, that is.
Better part of valor and all that.
Dan Sullivan
> DJS3 > I never said manyfold is the correct word.
>
> I see you're taking the high road, for you, that is.
> Better part of valor and all that.
Just keeping the parameters of the discussion to my actual statements, grag.
If that's a problem for you and pangborn, maybe you'd both be better off
keeping your mouths shut.
A closed mouth gathers no feet.
Greegor
G > I see you're taking the high road, for you, that is.
G > Better part of valor and all that.
DJS3 > Just keeping the parameters of the discussion
DJS3 > to my actual statements, grag.
DJS3 >
DJS3 > If that's a problem for you and pangborn, maybe
DJS3 > you'd both be better off keeping your mouths shut.
DJS3 >
DJS3 > A closed mouth gathers no feet.
So to recap:
In MAY 2009 Dan started a thread to ridicule Ken's use of the word
"manifold".
Dan pretended that it was an incorrect word choice.
Dan suggested the word "manyfold".
Dan asserted that the word choice indicated some failing
in Ken's education and posed as supremely LITERATE.
In November of 2009 Dan was STILL presenting this
as indicative of Ken's poor education.
Then Dan denies what he said.
Reposts of the MAY message show this is a lie.
Dan tries to pass it all off as "his sense of humor"
and a joke, just making Ken jump through hoops.
Now Dan is pretending that he technically
did not say what he actually said.
It's all looking very Willsian.
Kent Wills
While Dan will be in a far better possition to know his
motivation, I suspect he's trying to keep you and Pangborn focused on
what he actually stated and when vs. what you both dishonestly claim.
You both like to distort what someone has stated. Often times
you both distort to a degree that what you claim bares no resemblance
to the initial statement.
What is perhaps most frightening is that you and Pangborn see
this as being perfectly normal behavior, unless someone does it to
you.
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, or proving he's so
stupid he thinks I'm Asian.
MID:<c6bac3f6-7a0e-4bf8-8ddd-d77bccfc6...@p49g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/msg/395db830731df54a
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott Hanson, wife beater and child abuser: "Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Greg Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child abuser.
Message-ID: <35120b16.04011...@posting.google.com>
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
Path:
news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-protective-services
With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching
into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon,
videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I
was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with
water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out
a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she
gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you
were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?"
She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I
prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed
triumphantly.
--a true story
Kent Wills
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>DJS3 > I never said manyfold is the correct word.
>
>G > I see you're taking the high road, for you, that is.
>G > Better part of valor and all that.
>
>DJS3 > Just keeping the parameters of the discussion
>DJS3 > to my actual statements, grag.
>DJS3 >
>DJS3 > If that's a problem for you and pangborn, maybe
>DJS3 > you'd both be better off keeping your mouths shut.
>DJS3 >
>DJS3 > A closed mouth gathers no feet.
>
>So to recap:
>
>In MAY 2009 Dan started a thread to ridicule Ken's use of the word
>"manifold".
You already proved Pangborn LIED when he claimed Dan did so on
November 13, 2009.
No one is disputing this.
>Dan pretended that it was an incorrect word choice.
>Dan suggested the word "manyfold".
>Dan asserted that the word choice indicated some failing
>in Ken's education and posed as supremely LITERATE.
I saw no such presentation from Dan.
It's possible he did, and the post didn't come to misc.legal.
Please post the MID and/or Google link to any such post, unless, of
course, you're lying.
>
>In November of 2009 Dan was STILL presenting this
>as indicative of Ken's poor education.
Actually, Pangborn brought it up. You were able to prove
Pangborn lied in his posts.
How upset is he that you did so?
>
>Then Dan denies what he said.
No he didn't.
>
>Reposts of the MAY message show this is a lie.
It proves that Pangborn LIED when he claimed Dan wrote it on
November 13, 2009.
>
>Dan tries to pass it all off as "his sense of humor"
>and a joke, just making Ken jump through hoops.
Dan is able to get Pangborn to do just about anything. And I
thought I was good at moleing.
While I can often get you to post or not based on how I word my
posts, clearly Dan has the edge when it comes to Ken.
>
>Now Dan is pretending that he technically
>did not say what he actually said.
That's not the claim he's made.
>
>It's all looking very Willsian.
So the truth is now called Willsian? But earlier you claimed
proving you the drug addicted liar you are is Willsian.
Do decide what you want Willsian to mean so that I can get proper
business cards printed :)
Dan Sullivan
>
> DJS3 > I never said manyfold is the correct word.
>
> G > I see you're taking the high road, for you, that is.
> G > Better part of valor and all that.
>
> DJS3 > Just keeping the parameters of the discussion
> DJS3 > to my actual statements, grag.
> DJS3 >
> DJS3 > If that's a problem for you and pangborn, maybe
> DJS3 > you'd both be better off keeping your mouths shut.
> DJS3 >
> DJS3 > A closed mouth gathers no feet.
>
> So to recap:
>
> In MAY 2009 Dan started a thread to ridicule Ken's use of the word
> "manifold".
Wrong.
Read from my third post on in that thread
> Dan pretended that it was an incorrect word choice.
Not true.
> Dan suggested the word "manyfold".
No, I didn't.
> Dan asserted that the word choice indicated some failing
> in Ken's education and posed as supremely LITERATE.
Everything kan pangborn's does and says demonstrates that he is a complete
and utter fool.
Same with you, grag.
> In November of 2009 Dan was STILL presenting this
> as indicative of Ken's poor education.
>
> Then Dan denies what he said.
What I said was "Don't you think someone who supposedly had a REAL
UNIVERSITY education would know how to spell man-Y-fold, correctly?"
You two morons have been going on about it for six months.
> Reposts of the MAY message show this is a lie.
No, it doesn't.
> Dan tries to pass it all off as "his sense of humor"
> and a joke, just making Ken jump through hoops.
And you, grag.
And you're STILL jumping!!!
LOL!!!
> Now Dan is pretending that he technically
> did not say what he actually said.
What I said was "Don't you think someone who supposedly had a REAL
UNIVERSITY education would know how to spell man-Y-fold, correctly?"
Right, grag?
Greegor
Greegor
G > did not say what he actually said.
DJS3 > What I said was "Don't you think someone
DJS3 > who supposedly had a REAL UNIVERSITY
DJS3 > education would know how to spell
DJS3 > man-Y-fold, correctly?"
DJS3 >
DJS3 > Right, grag?
Please diagram the logic of your question, Oh LITERATE one.
Dan Sullivan
It's just a question, grag.
How many years has it been since you declared yourself to be "erudite," and
yet you're still lead around like a brainless "fetchit" puppy, grag?
krp
> >> On Nov 13, 6:46 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> Dan, Do you REALLY still think that the word
> >>> "manifold" on Ken's site is incorrect word usage?
>
> >> DJS#3> Is that what I said?
>
> >> It is PRECISELY what you claimed.
> > That's not true. Prove otherwise.
> You keep proving it every time you post your "MANFOLD" bullshit,
> Sullivan.
> >>> Do you think the word manifold is ONLY an automotive term?
> >> DJS#3> Is that what I said?
> >> Pretty much what you said, yes.
> > That's not true.
> Unfortunately for you, you quoted yourself saying EXACTLY that
> yesterday.
DJS#3> No, that's not true.
Unfortunately, for you, it is true. Quit looking for a loophole to
escape being so foolishly wrong. Psychologically you are INCAPABLE of
admitting being wrong. It is a facet of Danny's Obsessive-Compulsive
disorder.Even when it is painfully obvious even to Danny that he's screwed
the pooch, he is INCAPABLE of admitting error. He is SO invested in every
paryicle of BULLSHIT he sends out that it is impossible for him to admit an
error no matter how small. I generally don't make a big deal of admitting
mine, but I have done so on occasion. When I see that something I have said
MIGHT be misconstrued I will correct it when I get a chance. Sullivan, in
contrast CANNOT!
> >>> Why do you think the word choice was wrong and
> >>> should have been "manyfold"?
> >> DJS#3> Is that what I said?
>
> >> It *IS* what you LOUDLY and repeatedly claimed even yesterday.
> > That's not true.
> Danny - let me ask you. Do you REALLY REALLY REALLY expect the whole
> world to have amnesia? Do you think regular readers have forgotten what
> you
> said yesterday?
> Here is the simple FACT, Sullivan, the use of the word "MANIFOLD" is
> correct. Your claim that the correct word is "manyfold" is plain BULLSHIT!
DJS#$> I never said manyfold is the correct word.
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!! Oh come on Danny. You said MY use of
the word "Manifold" displayed my lack of education and it should have been
"manyfold." CUT the shit here, Danny, you were DEAD WRONG. The more you
persist in your games the more of your credibility vanishes. Just admit you
were wrong and move on to more fertile ground.
krp
>
> "Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:88c478ac-29f0-46f3...@d5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
>> DJS3 > I never said manyfold is the correct word.
>>
>> I see you're taking the high road, for you, that is.
>> Better part of valor and all that.
>
> Just keeping the parameters of the discussion to my actual statements,
> grag.
No, Danny, now you aren't "wrong" you are LYING to cover your tracks.
krp
> DJS3 > I never said manyfold is the correct word.
>
> G > I see you're taking the high road, for you, that is.
> G > Better part of valor and all that.
>
> DJS3 > Just keeping the parameters of the discussion
> DJS3 > to my actual statements, grag.
> DJS3 >
> DJS3 > If that's a problem for you and pangborn, maybe
> DJS3 > you'd both be better off keeping your mouths shut.
> DJS3 >
> DJS3 > A closed mouth gathers no feet.
>
> So to recap:
>
> In MAY 2009 Dan started a thread to ridicule Ken's use of the word
> "manifold".
> Dan pretended that it was an incorrect word choice.
> Dan suggested the word "manyfold".
> Dan asserted that the word choice indicated some failing
> in Ken's education and posed as supremely LITERATE.
He says that is a LIKE he NEVER said that!
krp
>
> "Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3b709bd9-6ef1-4f81...@w19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> DJS3 > I never said manyfold is the correct word.
>>
>> G > I see you're taking the high road, for you, that is.
>> G > Better part of valor and all that.
>>
>> DJS3 > Just keeping the parameters of the discussion
>> DJS3 > to my actual statements, grag.
>> DJS3 >
>> DJS3 > If that's a problem for you and pangborn, maybe
>> DJS3 > you'd both be better off keeping your mouths shut.
>> DJS3 >
>> DJS3 > A closed mouth gathers no feet.
>>
>> So to recap:
>>
>> In MAY 2009 Dan started a thread to ridicule Ken's use of the word
>> "manifold".
>
> Wrong.
Do you think LYING will help your credibility Dan?
krp
"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:qliuf596nr4au2jj3...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:01:32 -0800 (PST), Greegor
> <gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>DJS3 > I never said manyfold is the correct word.
>>
>>I see you're taking the high road, for you, that is.
>>Better part of valor and all that.
>
> While Dan will be in a far better possition to know his
> motivation, I suspect he's trying to keep you and Pangborn focused on
> what he actually stated and when vs. what you both dishonestly claim.
Poor lying Greg, he posted Danny's EXACT post. We just believe our lying
eyes, right KUNT?
Dan Sullivan
"Don't you think someone who supposedly had a REAL UNIVERSITY education
would know how to spell man-Y-fold, correctly?"
Dan Sullivan
"Don't you think someone who supposedly had a REAL UNIVERSITY education
Dan Sullivan
"Don't you think someone who supposedly had a REAL UNIVERSITY education
Dan Sullivan
"Don't you think someone who supposedly had a REAL UNIVERSITY education
Dan Sullivan
"Don't you think someone who supposedly had a REAL UNIVERSITY education
would know how to spell man-Y-fold, correctly?"
I believe you owe yourself at least a dollar with your lies this morning,
pangborn... and the day's still young!
Greegor
WHY did you pick on Ken's use of the word manifold?
Why did you bring up the automotive engine manifold?
Was that jabbing about Ken's education just a joke?
I'm just MORTIFIED that you would trick me that way.
LOL
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/manyfold
man⋅y⋅fold /ˈmɛniˈfoʊld/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [men-ee-fohld]
Show IPA
Use manyfold in a Sentence
See web results for manyfold
See images of manyfold
–adverb by many times; by multiples: The state's highway expenses have
increased manyfold in the past decade.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Origin:
1875–80; many + -fold
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/manifold
man⋅i⋅fold /ˈmænəˌfoʊld/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [man-uh-fohld]
Show IPA
Use manifold in a Sentence
See web results for manifold
See images of manifold
–adjective
1. of many kinds; numerous and varied: manifold duties.
2. having numerous different parts, elements, features, forms, etc.: a
manifold program for social reform.
3. using, functioning with, or operating several similar or identical
devices at the same time.
4. (of paper business forms) made up of a number of sheets interleaved
with carbon paper.
5. being such or so designated for many reasons: a manifold enemy.
–noun 6. something having many different parts or features.
7. a copy or facsimile, as of something written, such as is made by
manifolding.
8. any thin, inexpensive paper for making carbon copies on a
typewriter.
9. Machinery. a chamber having several outlets through which a liquid
or gas is distributed or gathered.
10. Philosophy. (in Kantian epistemology) the totality of discrete
items of experience as presented to the mind; the constituents of a
sensory experience.
11. Mathematics. a topological space that is connected and locally
Euclidean. Compare locally Euclidean space.
–verb (used with object) 12. to make copies of, as with carbon paper.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Origin:
bef. 1000; ME; OE manigf(e)ald (adj.). See many, -fold
Related forms:
man⋅i⋅fold⋅ly, adverb
man⋅i⋅fold⋅ness, noun
Synonyms:
1. various, multitudinous. See many. 2. varied, divers, multifarious.
Antonyms:
1. simple, single.
Dan Sullivan
>
> Dan, What IS your insane obsession with "manyfold" versus "manifold"?
>
> WHY did you pick on Ken's use of the word manifold?
Because I wanted to.
> Why did you bring up the automotive engine manifold?
Because I wanted to.
> Was that jabbing about Ken's education just a joke?
I asked a single question about the word "manyfold" last May and you
two assholes have been harping on it ever since.
It's your's and pangborn's insane obsession, not mine.
You and kenny boy are my "fetchit twins."
SPEAK!
Greegor
"manifold"?
G > WHY did you pick on Ken's use of the word manifold?
DJS3 > Because I wanted to.
G > Why did you bring up the automotive engine manifold?
DJS3 > Because I wanted to.
G > Was that jabbing about Ken's education just a joke?
G > I'm just MORTIFIED that you would trick me that way.
G > LOL
DJS3 > I asked a single question about the word "manyfold" last May
and you
DJS3 > two assholes have been harping on it ever since.
DJS3 > It's your's and pangborn's insane obsession, not mine.
DJS3 > You and kenny boy are my "fetchit twins."
DJS3 > SPEAK!
You think THIS makes you superior somehow?
Does this make you a strategic genius or
prove your intellectual prowess?
What do you think you gained from this exercise, Dan?
I think your EGO got the best of you again.
You gored at Ken for what you mistakenly
thought was an English gaff.
But YOU got it wrong!
So when you finally realize that you try
to explain it away as intentional.
Like the comedian who says
"I meant to do that!".
Your giant EGO won't let you admit you screwed up.
So you lie.
What's new, Dan?
Kent Wills
wrote:
>
>"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:qliuf596nr4au2jj3...@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:01:32 -0800 (PST), Greegor
>> <gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>DJS3 > I never said manyfold is the correct word.
>>>
>>>I see you're taking the high road, for you, that is.
>>>Better part of valor and all that.
>>
>> While Dan will be in a far better possition to know his
>> motivation, I suspect he's trying to keep you and Pangborn focused on
>> what he actually stated and when vs. what you both dishonestly claim.
>
>
> Poor lying Greg,
So even when Greg proves you're lying, he's actually lying?
Whereas he posted copies of the actual posts, complete with the
date, how do you propose that he was lying?
I realize his honesty was an accident. He thought he was proving
something else. Greg is UNABLE to be honest unless he makes a mistake
or is forced in some way. Still, he was able to prove you lied.
It must really suck when the ONLY on-line friend you have proves
you to be the liar you are.
>he posted Danny's EXACT post. We just believe our lying
>eyes, right KUNT?
Note that Dan posted, "Don't you think someone who supposedly had
a REAL UNIVERSITY education would know how to spell man-Y-fold,
correctly?"
Greg was able to prove you LIED about the date of the post (you
claimed November 13, 2009 and Greg PROVED it was in May) and that you
LIED about the contents of the post (you claimed Dan made a statement
when, as Greg prove, he asked a question).
"And you RULE OUT that it could be MOORE my biggest
fan and GAY lover."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP Consulting and The A-Team, LYING
and claiming David Moore is his gay lover. Message-ID:
<_MlOj.598$pH4.7@trnddc06>
Kent Wills
wrote:
>
>"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>news:2468ea39-fdce-4d64...@31g2000vbf.googlegroups.com...
>
>> >> On Nov 13, 6:46 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> Dan, Do you REALLY still think that the word
>> >>> "manifold" on Ken's site is incorrect word usage?
>>
>> >> DJS#3> Is that what I said?
>>
>> >> It is PRECISELY what you claimed.
>> > That's not true. Prove otherwise.
>
>> You keep proving it every time you post your "MANFOLD" bullshit,
>> Sullivan.
>
>> >>> Do you think the word manifold is ONLY an automotive term?
>
>> >> DJS#3> Is that what I said?
>
>> >> Pretty much what you said, yes.
>
>> > That's not true.
>
>> Unfortunately for you, you quoted yourself saying EXACTLY that
>> yesterday.
>
>DJS#3> No, that's not true.
>
> Unfortunately, for you, it is true. Quit looking for a loophole to
>escape being so foolishly wrong.
It's very sad that you consider truth to be a loophole.
>Psychologically you are INCAPABLE of
>admitting being wrong.
Projection noted.
>It is a facet of Danny's Obsessive-Compulsive
>disorder.
I've seen nothing from Dan that is consistent with OCD.
Please point out what in his posts you see as indications of OCD.
Unless you're projecting, of course.
>Even when it is painfully obvious even to Danny that he's screwed
>the pooch, he is INCAPABLE of admitting error.
What error did he make? How is asking a question an error? Do
you think trying to increase one's knowledge is a bad thing? If so,
how long have you held this view?
>He is SO invested in every
>paryicle of BULLSHIT he sends out that it is impossible for him to admit an
>error no matter how small.
Yet he does so when errors are pointed out. Some times He does so
before anyone else notices.
He doesn't admit to your pathological lies about fictional errors.
>I generally don't make a big deal of admitting
>mine, but I have done so on occasion.
You rarely do.
>When I see that something I have said
>MIGHT be misconstrued I will correct it when I get a chance. Sullivan, in
>contrast CANNOT!
In over four years of reading your rants on misc.legal, and about
two years of dealing with you directly, I've only seen you claim you
made an error once. One time. That's it.
You're proved wrong multiple times, yet DEMAND you're correct.
Even after proof is provided that you're in error, you still DEMAND
you are not.
Either you have lied each and every time, or you are UNABLE to
admit when you made a mistake. Only you can KNOW which is the case.
I can understand your NEED to avoid either.
If you admit you've been lying, you will be letting prospective
clients know they shouldn't hire you because you will lie to them
without any indication of remorse.
If you admit to your countless errors, you will be letting
prospective clients know they shouldn't hire you because you're far
too incompetent to actually deal with their case.
Either way, you screwed yourself, so you pile on more lies in the
hope that people will get confused.
Maybe it works, though I doubt it.
>
>> >>> Why do you think the word choice was wrong and
>> >>> should have been "manyfold"?
>
>> >> DJS#3> Is that what I said?
>>
>> >> It *IS* what you LOUDLY and repeatedly claimed even yesterday.
>> > That's not true.
>
>> Danny - let me ask you. Do you REALLY REALLY REALLY expect the whole
>> world to have amnesia? Do you think regular readers have forgotten what
>> you
>> said yesterday?
>
>> Here is the simple FACT, Sullivan, the use of the word "MANIFOLD" is
>> correct. Your claim that the correct word is "manyfold" is plain BULLSHIT!
>
>DJS#$> I never said manyfold is the correct word.
>
> Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!! Oh come on Danny. You said MY use of
>the word "Manifold" displayed my lack of education and it should have been
>"manyfold."
Post the MID and/or Google link to one such message from Dan.
Just one is all I ask.
If you're wrong, either by lying or error, you'll offer nothing.
>CUT the shit here, Danny, you were DEAD WRONG. The more you
>persist in your games the more of your credibility vanishes. Just admit you
>were wrong and move on to more fertile ground.
>
That's almost funny.
You are reduced to LYING about what Dan posted and want him to
claim he was and is in error.
"Don't you think someone who supposedly had a REAL UNIVERSITY
education would know how to spell man-Y-fold, correctly?"
-- Dan Sullivan
That's what he posted. It's not a claim but a question.
"you are reading Moore's SELECTIVE material that is HIGHLY edited."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn claiming in misc.legal that David Moore can
and does edit Google's Usenet archive.
Message-ID: <n9Sfm.1372$nh2...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>
womanGoddess
> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:013f4338-0e8f-44c7...@p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > DJS3 > Just as long as pangborn keeps jumping thru the hoops.
>
> > G > Yeah, you're really turning up the heat! (Yawn!)
>
> > KRP > He needs to change his name to "LARRY LOOPHOLE."
>
> > DJS#3 > You need to fix more errors on your website,
> > DJS#3 > pangborn.Unless you have a valid excuse
> > DJS#3 > for leaving the errors.
>
> > GH> Dan pretends with an "aire" of authority!
>
> > KRP > Says WHO? YOU? Bwahahahahahahahaha!
> > KRP > Like I should replace "MANIFOLD" with your
> > KRP > "MANYFOLD?" PUHLEEEEZE give us another
> > KRP > ENGLISH LESSON HERR PROFESSOR!!!!
>
> > GH> Yes, What would a LITERATE PERSON make of Dan's exhortation?
>
> > Danny HOWLED for almost a month that I improperly used the word
> > "manifold" which HE CLAIMS is only used to refer to an automobile part.
> > That
> > in his EXPERT OPINION and an English linguistic EEXPERT. ALl the BLUSTER
> > that the "CORRECT" word and the ONLY correct word would have beeen
> > "MANYFOLD" to refer to "numerous" He thinks he has me "jumping through
> > hoops" for him, he is truly a legend in his own mind. He claims toi be
> > getting THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of clients from ASCPS who choose him over
> > me
> > because of his MASSIVE knowledge and how he shoots me down all the time.
> > Funny, they don't seem to be posting ON ASCPS this GREAT PRIASE for his
> > MANYFOLD TALENTS. <snicker> Danny goes in the bathroom and starts singing
> > his Michael Jackson song... "Ime BAD, I'M BAD".... believing he is
> > SUPERMAN!
> > Just think - a copuple of years ago it was KING SULLIVAN the ruler of
> > ASCPS.
> > He controlled the discussions and was the MASTER of the group. Everyone
> > genuflected before him. Not so much any more, huh? LONG LIVE THE KING!
>
> GH> Moe thinks she's ""helping"" him! Isn't that cute? LOL
>
> It's rather special. As in "Isn't that Special" from the Church Lady on
> SNL. Sullivan remains a LEGEND IN HIS OWN MIND as do the others in the gang
> of 4.
And yet you and Greg spends so much time about Sullivan as if he was
so important in your lives.
What would you two do without him?
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
womanGoddess
> Dan, Is this an example of how you THINK you are LITERATE?
>
> DJS3 > MANIFOLD???
> DJS3 > Like from a car or truck engine?
Speaking of literacy Greg, have you pointed out the many misspellings
your master Kennie does in his many posts?
Or do you wish to once again show your hypocrisy?
womanGoddess
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>
> news:4afd681c$0$22510$607e...@cv.net...
>
>
>
> >>>>> DJS3 > Just as long as pangborn keeps jumping thru the hoops.
>
> >>>>> G > Yeah, you're really turning up the heat! (Yawn!)
>
> >>>>> KRP > He needs to change his name to "LARRY LOOPHOLE."
>
> >>>>> DJS#3 > You need to fix more errors on your website,
> >>>>> DJS#3 > pangborn.Unless you have a valid excuse
> >>>>> DJS#3 > for leaving the errors.
>
> >>>>> GH> Dan pretends with an "aire" of authority!
>
> >>>>> KRP > Says WHO? YOU? Bwahahahahahahahaha!
> >>>>> KRP > Like I should replace "MANIFOLD" with your
> >>>>> KRP > "MANYFOLD?" PUHLEEEEZE give us another
> >>>>> KRP > ENGLISH LESSON HERR PROFESSOR!!!!
>
> >>>>> GH> Yes, What would a LITERATE PERSON make of Dan's exhortation?
>
> >>>>> "manifold" which HE CLAIMS is only used to refer to an automobile
> >>>>> part.
>
> >>>> word manyfold.
>
> >>>> You made FAR more than ONE POST, Sullivan.
>
> >>> Sure I have, but only the one regarding the use of the word manyfold.
>
> >> But MANY claiming that the use of the word "MANIFOLD" was wrong.
>
> > Not true, prove otherwise.
>
> Christ, Sullivan you are DAMN stupid. You were just HOWLING about it
> again this morning about how it should be "MANYFOLD" Danny - you're a
> fukkking NUT!
As opposed you what you are doing now about this?
How many posts have you done about the ' manyfold" thing you seem to
masturbate in glee upon?
womanGoddess
> "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>
>
>
>
> > MANYFOLDLY WRONG 99% of the time!> >news:4afd994e$0$5001$607e...@cv.net...
>
> >>>> >>> DJS3 > Just as long as pangborn keeps jumping thru the hoops.
>
> >>>> >>> G > Yeah, you're really turning up the heat! (Yawn!)
>
> >>>> >>> KRP > He needs to change his name to "LARRY LOOPHOLE."
>
> >>>> >>> DJS#3 > You need to fix more errors on your website,
> >>>> >>> DJS#3 > pangborn.Unless you have a valid excuse
> >>>> >>> DJS#3 > for leaving the errors.
>
> >>>> >>> GH> Dan pretends with an "aire" of authority!
>
> >>>> >>> KRP > Says WHO? YOU? Bwahahahahahahahaha!
> >>>> >>> KRP > Like I should replace "MANIFOLD" with your
> >>>> >>> KRP > "MANYFOLD?" PUHLEEEEZE give us another
> >>>> >>> KRP > ENGLISH LESSON HERR PROFESSOR!!!!
>
> >>>> >>> GH> Yes, What would a LITERATE PERSON make of Dan's exhortation?
>
> >>>> >>> Danny HOWLED for almost a month that I inproperly used the word
> >>>> >>> "manifold" which HE CLAIMS is only used to refer to an automobile
> >>>> >>> part.
>
> >>>> >> DJS#3> First I made one post on May 17, 2009, regarding the use of
> >>>> >> the
> >>>> >> word manyfold.
>
> >>>> >> You made FAR more than ONE POST, Sullivan.
> >>>> > Sure I have, but only the one regarding the use of the word manyfold.
>
> >>>> repeatedly have proved YOU WRONG on the subject. Laughably WRONG!
>
> >>> DJS#3> BTW, pangborn, changing the subject to "more MANYFOLD" is
> >>> redundant.
>
> >>> What's the matter Danny - CANNOT admit you were wrong? YOU being the
> >>> loudmouth here used my use of the word "manifold" as one of your
> >>> examples of the ERRORS you claimed to have found on my website. A "HUGE
> >>> ONE" you once said. But you were full of shit AS USUAL!!!!
>
> >> More of pangborn's lies.
>
> > Sullivan the LIES are yours not mind. Your MANIFOLD lies.
>
> Post what I said that were lies about manyfold.
>
> If you don't, and I KNOW you can't, you will again be proven a liar,
> pangborn.
Sullivan, you know he'll never do that. He'll just jack off about the
" manyfold' crap over and over for more than a month.
krp
On Nov 15, 3:11 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dan, What IS your insane obsession with "manyfold" versus "manifold"?
>
> WHY did you pick on Ken's use of the word manifold?
DJS#3> Because I wanted to.
And you were WRONG about it.
> Why did you bring up the automotive engine manifold?
DJS#3> Because I wanted to.
And you were WRONG about it.
> Was that jabbing about Ken's education just a joke?
DJS#3> I asked a single question about the word "manyfold" last May and you
DJS#3> two assholes have been harping on it ever since.
Sullivan - you overrate your potency in your lame claims that you were
"merely asking questions" when anyone with a working brain knows you were
trying to make fact claims. Whenever you get taken down for your bullshit
your ESCAPE is that you were only asking questions, and you THINK people buy
that lame dodge. They don't, Danny boy! You are as obtuse as cellophane
wrap.
krp
>>> >> On Nov 13, 6:46 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>> Dan, Do you REALLY still think that the word
>>> >>> "manifold" on Ken's site is incorrect word usage?
>>>
>>> >> DJS#3> Is that what I said?
>>>
>>> >> It is PRECISELY what you claimed.
>>> > That's not true. Prove otherwise.
>>
>>> You keep proving it every time you post your "MANFOLD" bullshit,
>>> Sullivan.
>>
>>> >>> Do you think the word manifold is ONLY an automotive term?
>>
>>> >> DJS#3> Is that what I said?
>>
>>> >> Pretty much what you said, yes.
>>
>>> > That's not true.
>>
>>> Unfortunately for you, you quoted yourself saying EXACTLY that
>>> yesterday.
>>
>>DJS#3> No, that's not true.
>>
>> Unfortunately, for you, it is true. Quit looking for a loophole to
>>escape being so foolishly wrong.
> It's very sad that you consider truth to be a loophole.
Kunt - are you SUPID ENOUGH to think that "MANYFOLD" is the correct word
as opposed to "Manifold?" That's a RHETORICAL question, Kunt. OF COURSE YOU
ARE!!
krp
> On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 08:50:00 -0500, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:qliuf596nr4au2jj3...@4ax.com...
>>> On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:01:32 -0800 (PST), Greegor
>>> <gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>DJS3 > I never said manyfold is the correct word.
>>>>
>>>>I see you're taking the high road, for you, that is.
>>>>Better part of valor and all that.
>>>
>>> While Dan will be in a far better possition to know his
>>> motivation, I suspect he's trying to keep you and Pangborn focused on
>>> what he actually stated and when vs. what you both dishonestly claim.
>>
>>
>> Poor lying Greg,
>
> So even when Greg proves you're lying, he's actually lying?
Nice POST EDIT, Kunt.
NOW - let's have what I ACTUALLY said, okay POLACK?
> Poor lying Greg, he posted Danny's EXACT post. We just believe our
> lying
>eyes, right KUNT?
I guess we just CANNOT believe our LYING EYES, right Kunt?
krp
"womanGoddess" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:22235a5e-b943-4323...@u7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
MOE> And yet you and Greg spends so much time about Sullivan as if he was
MOE> so important in your lives. What would you two do without him?
I'd have a hell of a lot LESS to laugh at. Danny is almost as good a
comic relief as YOU are McAllister.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>
>"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>news:8ce0d695-b055-41b2...@l35g2000vba.googlegroups.com...
>On Nov 15, 3:11 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dan, What IS your insane obsession with "manyfold" versus "manifold"?
>>
>> WHY did you pick on Ken's use of the word manifold?
>
>DJS#3> Because I wanted to.
>
> And you were WRONG about it.
>
>> Why did you bring up the automotive engine manifold?
>
>DJS#3> Because I wanted to.
>
> And you were WRONG about it.
>
>> Was that jabbing about Ken's education just a joke?
>
>DJS#3> I asked a single question about the word "manyfold" last May and you
>DJS#3> two assholes have been harping on it ever since.
>
> Sullivan - you overrate your potency in your lame claims that you were
>"merely asking questions" when anyone with a working brain knows you were
>trying to make fact claims.
You are free to lie as often as you want/need. Greg posted the
PROOF that Dan asked a question and did not make a fact claim.
>Whenever you get taken down for your bullshit
>your ESCAPE is that you were only asking questions, and you THINK people buy
>that lame dodge. They don't, Danny boy! You are as obtuse as cellophane
>wrap.
>
Greg already supplied the proof. Lie about it all you want/need,
but the truth will remain the truth.
"Miranda was a STUPID WASTE OF TIME AND DID NOTHING!"
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn of KRP Consulting and The A-Team.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>
>"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:a311g5pt78mtn5a82...@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 08:50:00 -0500, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:qliuf596nr4au2jj3...@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:01:32 -0800 (PST), Greegor
>>>> <gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>DJS3 > I never said manyfold is the correct word.
>>>>>
>>>>>I see you're taking the high road, for you, that is.
>>>>>Better part of valor and all that.
>>>>
>>>> While Dan will be in a far better possition to know his
>>>> motivation, I suspect he's trying to keep you and Pangborn focused on
>>>> what he actually stated and when vs. what you both dishonestly claim.
>>>
>>>
>>> Poor lying Greg,
>>
>> So even when Greg proves you're lying, he's actually lying?
>
>Nice POST EDIT, Kunt.
>
What post edit?
You're the one who dishonestly snipped what I posted.
Here's the text. Show me where I edited anything you wrote:
---------
>> While Dan will be in a far better possition to know his
>> motivation, I suspect he's trying to keep you and Pangborn focused on
>> what he actually stated and when vs. what you both dishonestly claim.
>
>
> Poor lying Greg,
So even when Greg proves you're lying, he's actually lying?
Whereas he posted copies of the actual posts, complete with the
date, how do you propose that he was lying?
I realize his honesty was an accident. He thought he was proving
something else. Greg is UNABLE to be honest unless he makes a mistake
or is forced in some way. Still, he was able to prove you lied.
It must really suck when the ONLY on-line friend you have proves
you to be the liar you are.
>he posted Danny's EXACT post. We just believe our lying
>eyes, right KUNT?
Note that Dan posted, "Don't you think someone who supposedly had
a REAL UNIVERSITY education would know how to spell man-Y-fold,
correctly?"
Greg was able to prove you LIED about the date of the post (you
claimed November 13, 2009 and Greg PROVED it was in May) and that you
LIED about the contents of the post (you claimed Dan made a statement
when, as Greg prove, he asked a question).
----------
Note how I included your full text in my reply. You, being the
pathological drunk liar you are, removed what I posted.
>NOW - let's have what I ACTUALLY said, okay POLACK?
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com/race.html
You're a bigot. Everyone accepts this as proved by the fact that
no one, not even you, has offered any denial.
>
>> Poor lying Greg, he posted Danny's EXACT post. We just believe our
>> lying
>>eyes, right KUNT?
>
>I guess we just CANNOT believe our LYING EYES, right Kunt?
>
Had you not dishonestly snipped my reply, you would see how Greg
PROVED you lied.
What is the specific reason your alcoholism (unless you lied)
forced you to be so dishonest in this instance? I'd like a serious
and honest answer.
"Sometimes Greg is sloppy with things like that. I would agree the
significance of the difference may be just a wee bit over his head"
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn, alcoholic (according to him)
owner/operator of KRP CONsulting and The A-Team commenting on his ONLY
on-line friend, Gregory Scott Hanson.
Kent Wills
wrote:
Have I ever presented such a claim? Ever?
"I am insane!"
--Kenneth Robert Pangborn, alcoholic (according to his own claims)
owner/operator of KRP Consulting and The A-team, posting to
alt.dads-rights.unmoderated claiming that he was found legally insane.
Dan Sullivan
>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:8ce0d695-b055-41b2...@l35g2000vba.googlegroups.com...
> On Nov 15, 3:11 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dan, What IS your insane obsession with "manyfold" versus "manifold"?
>>
>> WHY did you pick on Ken's use of the word manifold?
>
> DJS#3> Because I wanted to.
>
> And you were WRONG about it.
My post,
==========
ken pangborn of the a-team claims he has a master's degree from a
university... an unnamed university.
From the a-team website "THE WRONG TRACK," how appropriate!
http://www.a-team.org/the_wrong_track.html
First sentence, second paragreph...
"The problems with this process are manifold."
MANIFOLD???
Like from a car or truck engine?
===========
Nothing wrong there.
>> Why did you bring up the automotive engine manifold?
>
> DJS#3> Because I wanted to.
>
> And you were WRONG about it.
Nothing wrong there, see above.
>> Was that jabbing about Ken's education just a joke?
>
> DJS#3> I asked a single question about the word "manyfold" last May and
> you
> DJS#3> two assholes have been harping on it ever since.
>
> Sullivan - you overrate your potency in your lame claims that you were
> "merely asking questions" when anyone with a working brain knows you were
> trying to make fact claims.
If I wanted to make fact claims, I would have made fact claims.
I simply asked questions.
> Whenever you get taken down for your bullshit your ESCAPE is that you were
> only asking questions,
So, pangborn, you do recognize that I was only asking questions.
My puppy did get up early this morning... 3:13AM.
On that audio tape were you saying "PARK, PARK, PARK" or "BARK, BARK,
BARK???"
Dan Sullivan
> "Kent Wills" <compu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
That isn't what I said, pangborn.
Greegor
> "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>
> news:4b01099e$0$5117$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com...
>
>
>
DJS3 > So, pangborn, you do recognize that I was only asking
questions.
DJS3 >
DJS3 > My puppy did get up early this morning... 3:13AM.
DJS3 >
DJS3 > On that audio tape were you saying
DJS3 > "PARK, PARK, PARK" or "BARK, BARK, BARK???"
So you gave up on your pretense
at being a strategic genius, Dan?
Greegor
KRP > think that "MANYFOLD" is the correct
KRP > word as opposed to "Manifold?"
DJS3 > That isn't what I said, pangborn.
Dan, You pointed out the word "manifold" from
Ken's web page and postured as if the word
only had meaning in an automotive context.
YOUR subject line was:
"Don't you think someone who supposedly had
a REAL UNIVERSITY education would know
how to spell man-Y-fold, correctly?"
Your forced context and raging implications
were actually fairly clear.
Your recent attempt to evade your own
context and implications and play the
game that you technically did not say
something is NOT the kind of thing that
a LITERATE person would overlook.
You see, Dan, context and implication
are somewhat more important as the
level of education and the complexity
of language increases.
Put simply, truly LITERATE people do not
dismiss context and blatant implication
to focus exclusively on technicalities
of sentence structure, Dan.
You mentioned HIGH SCHOOL DEBATE, Dan.
Combined with your childish manifold/manyfold
argument I think that IS your level and you gave
away your arrested development.
krp
> >>> >> On Nov 13, 6:46 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >>> Dan, Do you REALLY still think that the word
> >>> >>> "manifold" on Ken's site is incorrect word usage?
>
> >>> >> DJS#3> Is that what I said?
>
> >>> >> It is PRECISELY what you claimed.
> >>> > That's not true. Prove otherwise.
>
> >>> You keep proving it every time you post your "MANFOLD" bullshit,
> >>> Sullivan.
>
> >>> >>> Do you think the word manifold is ONLY an automotive term?
>
> >>> >> DJS#3> Is that what I said?
>
> >>> >> Pretty much what you said, yes.
>
> >>> > That's not true.
>
> >>> Unfortunately for you, you quoted yourself saying EXACTLY that
> >>> yesterday.
>
> >>DJS#3> No, that's not true.
>
> >> Unfortunately, for you, it is true. Quit looking for a loophole to
> >>escape being so foolishly wrong.
> > It's very sad that you consider truth to be a loophole.
>
> Kunt - are you STUPID ENOUGH to think that "MANYFOLD" is the correct word
> as opposed to "Manifold?"
DJS#3> That isn't what I said, pangborn.
It is the INTENT of what you said, dipshit. Still playing LARRY
LOOPHOLE, aren't ya Sullivan?
krp
> KRP > Kunt - are you STUPID ENOUGH to
> KRP > think that "MANYFOLD" is the correct
> KRP > word as opposed to "Manifold?"
>
> DJS3 > That isn't what I said, pangborn.
> Dan, You pointed out the word "manifold" from
> Ken's web page and postured as if the word
> only had meaning in an automotive context.
Actually the subject originated in a thread where PROFESSOR SULLIVAN was
pointing out what *HE* claimed were English "GAFFES" on my webpage. It is
painfully obvious (for him, not me) that his INTENT within the ocntest of
the ongoing debate was to show what I wrote that was INCORRECT, in this
case, the use of the word "manifold" and his suggestion that the CORRECT
word was "MANYFOLD."
> YOUR subject line was:
> "Don't you think someone who supposedly had
> a REAL UNIVERSITY education would know
> how to spell man-Y-fold, correctly?"
It eventually morphed to that, yes, but again the import was so say the
use of the word "manifold" was WRONG and it should have been "MANYFOLD."
Now he wishes to alter his position. I can understand when his forst was was
so INSANE.
> Your forced context and raging implications
> were actually fairly clear.
> Your recent attempt to evade your own
> context and implications and play the
> game that you technically did not say
> something is NOT the kind of thing that
> a LITERATE person would overlook.
> You see, Dan, context and implication
> are somewhat more important as the
> level of education and the complexity
> of language increases.
Again the ORIGINAL CONTEXT was to what what PROFESSOR SULLIVAN thought
he would show that was an English error on my part. He was so SURE he "had
me" on it that it was several days before he started to realize he had
screwed the pooch and was looking like a stupid ass. Then he shut up about
it for a long time till I threw his fukkkkup back in his face when he
started to get on his theme of all the ERRORS he says are on the website.
You know, I bet there ARE some. SO WHAT?
> Put simply, truly LITERATE people do not
> dismiss context and blatant implication
> to focus exclusively on technicalities
> of sentence structure, Dan.
> You mentioned HIGH SCHOOL DEBATE, Dan.
Greg I would not elevate Sullivan's form of argumentation to the level
of high school debate. (He'd have been penalized long ago if that were the
forum.) His argument is more like what you see from some BRAT on an
elementary school playground. If he had made high school level he's have
admitted his error and moved on.
krp
Did I say you did? I merely ASKED A QUESTION!!!!!!!
Dan Sullivan
"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e885f907-a357-40c5...@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
> KRP > think that "MANYFOLD" is the correct
> KRP > word as opposed to "Manifold?"
>
> DJS3 > That isn't what I said, pangborn.
>
> Dan, You pointed out the word "manifold" from
> Ken's web page and postured as if the word
> only had meaning in an automotive context.
That's not true.
> YOUR subject line was:
> "Don't you think someone who supposedly had
> a REAL UNIVERSITY education would know
> how to spell man-Y-fold, correctly?"
>
> Your forced context and raging implications
> were actually fairly clear.
I didn't force anything nor did I imply anything.
> Your recent attempt to evade your own
> context and implications and play the
> game that you technically did not say
> something is NOT the kind of thing that
> a LITERATE person would overlook.
So who was it who tried to expalin it to you, grag?
> You see, Dan, context and implication
> are somewhat more important as the
> level of education and the complexity
> of language increases.
All pangborn had to do was answer my questions.
Or ask me why I asked the questions.
That would have been the end of the discussion.
But pangborn failed to answer my questions.
Instead he and you have been on a lunatic rampage since last May.
It's been fun to watch.
> Put simply, truly LITERATE people do not
> dismiss context and blatant implication
> to focus exclusively on technicalities
> of sentence structure, Dan.
A truly literate person would have recognized what I was doing.
> You mentioned HIGH SCHOOL DEBATE, Dan.
Yeah, I said pangborn couldn't win one.
> Combined with your childish manifold/manyfold
> argument I think that IS your level and you gave
> away your arrested development.
It was yours and pangborn's arrested development that's kept you two harping
on something that doesn't exist, grag.
LOL!!!
Dan Sullivan
>
> "Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:e885f907-a357-40c5...@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
>
>> KRP > Kunt - are you STUPID ENOUGH to
>> KRP > think that "MANYFOLD" is the correct
>> KRP > word as opposed to "Manifold?"
>>
>> DJS3 > That isn't what I said, pangborn.
>
>> Dan, You pointed out the word "manifold" from
>> Ken's web page and postured as if the word
>> only had meaning in an automotive context.
>
> Actually the subject originated in a thread where PROFESSOR SULLIVAN
> was pointing out what *HE* claimed were English "GAFFES" on my webpage. It
> is painfully obvious (for him, not me) that his INTENT within the ocntest
> of the ongoing debate was to show what I wrote that was INCORRECT, in this
> case, the use of the word "manifold" and his suggestion that the CORRECT
> word was "MANYFOLD."
I didn't suggest the correct word was manyfold.
I simple asked if you could spell manyfold, pangborn.
>> YOUR subject line was:
>> "Don't you think someone who supposedly had
>> a REAL UNIVERSITY education would know
>> how to spell man-Y-fold, correctly?"
>
> It eventually morphed to that, yes, but again the import was so say the
> use of the word "manifold" was WRONG and it should have been "MANYFOLD."
Import?
Explain how it's an import.
> Now he wishes to alter his position. I can understand when his forst was
> was so INSANE.
I didn't alter my position.
Forst?
Frost?
>> Your forced context and raging implications
>> were actually fairly clear.
>
>> Your recent attempt to evade your own
>> context and implications and play the
>> game that you technically did not say
>> something is NOT the kind of thing that
>> a LITERATE person would overlook.
>
>> You see, Dan, context and implication
>> are somewhat more important as the
>> level of education and the complexity
>> of language increases.
>
> Again the ORIGINAL CONTEXT was to what what PROFESSOR SULLIVAN thought
> he would show that was an English error on my part. He was so SURE he "had
> me" on it that it was several days before he started to realize he had
> screwed the pooch and was looking like a stupid ass.
Read my third post in the thread, pangborn.
Kent Wills
wrote:
[...]
>>>>> Unfortunately, for you, it is true. Quit looking for a loophole to
>>>>>escape being so foolishly wrong.
>>>
>>>> It's very sad that you consider truth to be a loophole.
>>>
>>> Kunt - are you SUPID ENOUGH to think that "MANYFOLD" is the correct
>>> word
>>>as opposed to "Manifold?"
>>
>> Have I ever presented such a claim? Ever?
>
>Did I say you did?
If you had, I wouldn't have needed to ask you a follow-up
question for clarification.
>I merely ASKED A QUESTION!!!!!!!
And I've not presented otherwise. I asked for clarification. I
note you RAN from my request. Any particular reason you're too scared
to clarify?
If I have presented that which you asked, you would have answered
in the affirmative.
If I have not presented that which you asked, you would have
answered in the negative.
Now that you've played the avoidance game, please answer my
question, unless an honest answer is just too difficult for you.
"CPS cases are legal matters. Offering advice IS practicing law
without a license."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn admitting he practices law without a
license in misc.legal
Kent Wills
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>KRP > Kunt - are you STUPID ENOUGH to
>KRP > think that "MANYFOLD" is the correct
>KRP > word as opposed to "Manifold?"
>
>DJS3 > That isn't what I said, pangborn.
>
>Dan, You pointed out the word "manifold" from
>Ken's web page and postured as if the word
>only had meaning in an automotive context.
He asked a question. You already proved that.
>
>YOUR subject line was:
>"Don't you think someone who supposedly had
>a REAL UNIVERSITY education would know
>how to spell man-Y-fold, correctly?"
>
>Your forced context and raging implications
>were actually fairly clear.
How is asking a question forcing context and/or raging
implications? Please be specific, using pie charts as needed.
>
>Your recent attempt to evade your own
>context and implications and play the
>game that you technically did not say
>something is NOT the kind of thing that
>a LITERATE person would overlook.
It's not a technicality. Dan asked a question. One Pangborn RAN
from. And one you and he are both trying to twist into a statement.
>
>You see, Dan, context and implication
>are somewhat more important as the
>level of education and the complexity
>of language increases.
So you have NO direct experience with this.
>
>Put simply, truly LITERATE people do not
>dismiss context and blatant implication
>to focus exclusively on technicalities
>of sentence structure, Dan.
A question has no relevance to sentence structure, since it is
not, by definition, a sentence.
>You mentioned HIGH SCHOOL DEBATE, Dan.
Which has what to do with Pangborn having LIED, as you PROVED?
>
>Combined with your childish manifold/manyfold
>argument I think that IS your level and you gave
>away your arrested development.
Dan asked a question. You and your fellow substance abuser
(unless you each lied) have tried to present that Dan made a claim he
didn't make.
What's most puzzling to me is that you PROVED Pangborn lied about
the matter. Even after you did you, eliminating any claim of
ignorance or error, you present that Dan made a statement.
Since it's very clear that you are lying, please explain the
SPECIFIC part of your use and abuse of illegal drugs (unless your
admitting to it was also a lie) forces you to lie about that which you
know will get exposed. I'm very serious. I would really like to
know.
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, or proving he's so
stupid he thinks I'm Asian.
MID:<c6bac3f6-7a0e-4bf8-8ddd-d77bccfc6...@p49g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/msg/395db830731df54a
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott Hanson, wife beater and child abuser: "Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Greg Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child abuser.
Message-ID: <35120b16.04011...@posting.google.com>
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
Path:
news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-protective-services
With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching
into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon,
videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I
was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with
water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out
a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she
gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you
were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?"
She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I
prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed
triumphantly.
--a true story
krp
>
> "Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:e885f907-a357-40c5...@b2g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
>> KRP > Kunt - are you STUPID ENOUGH to
>> KRP > think that "MANYFOLD" is the correct
>> KRP > word as opposed to "Manifold?"
>>
>> DJS3 > That isn't what I said, pangborn.
>>
>> Dan, You pointed out the word "manifold" from
>> Ken's web page and postured as if the word
>> only had meaning in an automotive context.
>
> That's not true.
It is EXACTLY TRUE, DIPSHIT! Everyone can understand why you are running
like hell for cover now, Danny boy. You were WRONG, you are INCAPABLE of
admitting you were wrong, so your only option is to LIE about your claims
and TRY to play cute. People KNOW, Danny.