Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The problems with hiring ken pangborn of the a-team are manifold!!!

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Dan Sullivan

unread,
May 17, 2009, 11:19:28 AM5/17/09
to
ken pangborn of the a-team claims he has a master's degree from a
university... an unnamed university.

From the a-team website "THE WRONG TRACK," how appropriate!

http://www.a-team.org/the_wrong_track.html

First sentence, second paragreph...

"The problems with this process are manifold."

MANIFOLD???

Like from a car or truck engine?

Don't you think someone who supposedly had a REAL UNIVERSITY education
would know how to spell man-Y-fold, correctly?

Is it any wonder ken pangborn won't say which university he went to?

Greegor

unread,
May 17, 2009, 3:28:03 PM5/17/09
to

Dan Sullivan

unread,
May 17, 2009, 3:39:45 PM5/17/09
to
On May 17, 3:28 pm, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 17, 10:19 am, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
>
>

How 'bout yourself, grag?

Are you going to defend ken pangborn's obvious lack of education?

Or did ken pangborn misuse a word a sixth grader should know?


krp

unread,
May 17, 2009, 3:45:58 PM5/17/09
to

"Greegor" <Gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f8c2fa6a-2064-4a7a...@e23g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...

On May 17, 10:19 am, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
> ken pangborn of the a-team claims he has a master's degree from a
> university... an unnamed university.
>
> From the a-team website "THE WRONG TRACK," how appropriate!
>
> http://www.a-team.org/the_wrong_track.html
>
> First sentence, second paragreph...
>
> "The problems with this process are manifold."
>
> MANIFOLD???
>
> Like from a car or truck engine?
>
> Don't you think someone who supposedly had a REAL UNIVERSITY education
> would know how to spell man-Y-fold, correctly?
>
> Is it any wonder ken pangborn won't say which university he went to?

GH> Did you even check out the two definitions Dan?

How about this:

"A manifold is a mathematical space in which every point has a neighborhood
which resembles Euclidean space, but in which the global structure may be
more complicated. In discussing manifolds, the idea of dimension is
important. For example, lines are one-dimensional, and planes
two-dimensional. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifold"

http://education.yahoo.com/reference/dictionary/entry/manifold


Many and varied; of many kinds; multiple: our manifold failings.
Having many features or forms: manifold intelligence.
Being such for a variety of reasons: a manifold traitor.
Consisting of or operating several devices of one kind at the same time.

A whole composed of diverse elements.


http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/manifold

1 a: marked by diversity or variety b: many
2: comprehending or uniting various features : multifarious
3: rightfully so-called for many reasons <a manifold liar>
4: consisting of or operating many of one kind combined

<LOUD YAWN>

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/manifold


1. Many and varied; of many kinds; multiple: our manifold failings.
2. Having many features or forms: manifold intelligence.
3. Being such for a variety of reasons: a manifold traitor.
4. Consisting of or operating several devices of one kind at the same time.
n.
1. A whole composed of diverse elements.
2. One of several copies.

I REALLY enjoy it when PROFESSOR SULLIVAN goes off on a tear on his
EXPERT English lessons.Sullivan BRAG that HE is one of the LEADING experts
on English on the planet. We used the world "MANIFOLD" and in terms of how
it was used it is CORRECT and PROFESSOR Sullivan is AGAIN full of shit!!!

Here we are AGAIN with LITTLE peevish Danny Sullivan DESPERATELY trying
to find an error on my part, instead PROVING how ILLITERATE he REALLY is.
This is like his month long RANT about Down Syndrome versus Down's Syndrome.
I am SURE our LOUDMOUTHED ASSHOLE will go ON about this for weeks and be
UNDETERRED by what the IDIOTS at Webster's and Oxford claim,.. THEY are full
of shit and DANNY SULLIVAN is right! KOO KOO KAJOO MRS. ROBINSON!


Dan Sullivan

unread,
May 17, 2009, 4:07:18 PM5/17/09
to
On May 17, 3:45 pm, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "Greegor" <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message

>
> news:f8c2fa6a-2064-4a7a...@e23g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
> On May 17, 10:19 am, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > ken pangborn of the a-team claims he has a master's degree from a
> > university... an unnamed university.
>
> > From the a-team website "THE WRONG TRACK," how appropriate!
>
> >http://www.a-team.org/the_wrong_track.html
>
> > First sentence, second paragreph...
>
> > "The problems with this process are manifold."
>
> > MANIFOLD???
>
> > Like from a car or truck engine?
>
> > Don't you think someone who supposedly had a REAL UNIVERSITY education
> > would know how to spell man-Y-fold, correctly?
>
> > Is it any wonder ken pangborn won't say which university he went to?
>
> GH> Did you even check out the two definitions Dan?
>
> How about this:

How about it took 17 minutes for greg hanson to call you in Florida
from Iowa and have you respond to your lap dog's frantic message!!!!!

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

The Gang of Two!!!

How much do you owe grag for his support?

Do you send him empty cans and bottles for the deposit money?

Dan Sullivan

unread,
May 17, 2009, 4:29:46 PM5/17/09
to
On May 17, 3:45 pm, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

krp

unread,
May 17, 2009, 4:55:28 PM5/17/09
to

"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:40af28dc-b4bc-4f90...@o20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com...

On May 17, 3:45 pm, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "Greegor" <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:f8c2fa6a-2064-4a7a...@e23g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
> On May 17, 10:19 am, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > ken pangborn of the a-team claims he has a master's degree from a
> > university... an unnamed university.
>
> > From the a-team website "THE WRONG TRACK," how appropriate!
>
> >http://www.a-team.org/the_wrong_track.html
>
> > First sentence, second paragreph...
>
> > "The problems with this process are manifold."
>
> > MANIFOLD???
>
> > Like from a car or truck engine?
>
> > Don't you think someone who supposedly had a REAL UNIVERSITY education
> > would know how to spell man-Y-fold, correctly?
>
> > Is it any wonder ken pangborn won't say which university he went to?
>
> GH> Did you even check out the two definitions Dan?
>
> How about this:

DJS> How about it took 17 minutes for greg hanson to call you in Florida
DJS> from Iowa and have you respond to your lap dog's frantic message!!!!!

He didn't call me DANNY - I came by to check what your LATEST psychotic
episode would be. Can't admit you fukked the duck on the "MANIFOLD" thing
huh, Danny? What an absolute DORK you are. You are still psychologically
INCAPABLE of admitting you are wrong. No surprises there, Danny!

Greegor

unread,
May 17, 2009, 5:01:17 PM5/17/09
to
G > Did you even check out the two definitions Dan?

in alt.support.child-protective-services (ONLY) Dan posted:

DS > How 'bout yourself, grag?
DS >
DS > Are you going to defend ken pangborn's
DS > obvious lack of education?
DS >
DS > Or did ken pangborn misuse a word a
DS > sixth grader should know?

Dan, When you wuss out and post where your target
doesn't read it, is that a brave victory for you?

krp

unread,
May 17, 2009, 5:09:37 PM5/17/09
to

"Greegor" <Gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7f55f946-854f-4c1f...@o20g2000vbh.googlegroups.com...

I see COURAGEOUS DANNY is AGAIN shooting at my back in a newsgroup he
KNOWS I can't read. HOW BRAVE DANNY!!!

I like his HYSTERIA about MY "lack of education" and he brings out as
his BEST EXAMPLE that I used the word "MANIFOLD" when HE claims it should be
MANYFOLD. No, Danny, I'll stick with "MANIFOLD" to convey what I meant. YOU
on the other hand, Sullivan, are an ILLITERATE FEEB! The word is "MANIFOLD"
look it up.

http://www.wordreference.com/enit/Manifold

manifold (multiple)

http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/manifold?view=uk

. adjective formal or literary 1 many and various. 2 having many different
forms.


BUT what the fukk does Webster OR Oxford know when we have PROFESSOR
DANNY SULLIVAN to give us a WRONG definition and SCREAM LIKE A GIRL about
it!


Dan Sullivan

unread,
May 17, 2009, 6:36:21 PM5/17/09
to

I don't care if ken can read my messages or not.

Greegor

unread,
May 18, 2009, 12:38:15 AM5/18/09
to
G > Did you even check out the two definitions Dan?
G > in alt.support.child-protective-services (ONLY) Dan posted:

DS > How 'bout yourself, grag?
DS >
DS > Are you going to defend ken pangborn's
DS > obvious lack of education?
DS >
DS > Or did ken pangborn misuse a word a
DS > sixth grader should know?

G > Dan, When you wuss out and post where your target
G > doesn't read it, is that a brave victory for you?

DS > I don't care if ken can read my messages or not.

Sure you don't care, Dan! Wuss!

Dan Sullivan

unread,
May 18, 2009, 2:50:41 AM5/18/09
to
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/...

ken pangborn of the a-team says "it is fair to say" of the
falsely accused... “normal people don’t get accused of these things.”
1 Dan Sullivan May 16
2 Dan Sullivan May 16
3 Dan Sullivan May 16
4 Dan Sullivan May 17

1. Newsgroups: alt.support.child-protective-services
From: Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 08:53:27 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, May 16 2009 10:53 am
Subject: ken pangborn of the a-team says "it is fair to say" of the
falsely accused... “normal people don’t get accused of these things.”

http://www.a-team.org/wrongly_accused.html

It is fair to say, however unpopular it may be, that “normal people
don’t get accused of these things.” As much as people facing
accusations want to see themselves as “normal” when we look at their
profiles on psychological testing we see clear trait patterns for the
people facing the allegations.

Paragraph 8, "GENERAL INFORMATION."

2. Newsgroups: alt.support.child-protective-services
From: Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 10:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, May 16 2009 12:46 pm
Subject: Re: ken pangborn of the a-team says "it is fair to say" of
the falsely accused... “normal people don’t get accused of these
things.”

On May 16, 11:53 am, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:

> http://www.a-team.org/wrongly_accused.html
> It is fair to say, however unpopular it may be, that “normal people
> don’t get accused of these things.” As much as people facing
> accusations want to see themselves as “normal” when we look at their
> profiles on psychological testing we see clear trait patterns for the
> people facing the allegations.
> Paragraph 8, "GENERAL INFORMATION."

Also the prosecution and CPS will be aware of ken pangborn's claim
that he has a Master's Degree in Psychology so not only has he
declared his client to be less than normal, he's diagnosed them as
having WAS-DT, that is Wrongly Accused Syndrome - Disordered
Thinking.

What Judge is going to give sole custody to someone who has been
diagnosed as having a mental disorder by the a-team psychologist/
consultant on their own defense team???

3. Newsgroups: alt.support.child-protective-services
From: Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net>
Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 17:46:46 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, May 16 2009 7:46 pm
Subject: Re: ken pangborn of the a-team says "it is fair to say" of
the falsely accused... “normal people don’t get accused of these
things.”

On May 16, 1:46 pm, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:

- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

> On May 16, 11:53 am, Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
> >http://www.a-team.org/wrongly_accused.html
> > It is fair to say, however unpopular it may be, that “normal people
> > don’t get accused of these things.” As much as people facing
> > accusations want to see themselves as “normal” when we look at their
> > profiles on psychological testing we see clear trait patterns for the
> > people facing the allegations.
> > Paragraph 8, "GENERAL INFORMATION."
> Also the prosecution and CPS will be aware of ken pangborn's claim
> that he has a Master's Degree in Psychology so not only has he
> declared his client to be less than normal, he's diagnosed them as
> having WAS-DT, that is Wrongly Accused Syndrome - Disordered Thinking.
> What Judge is going to give sole custody to someone who has been
> diagnosed as having a mental disorder by the a-team psychologist/
> consultant on their own defense team???

Here's the last paragraph on the page "GENERAL INFORMATION"

WRONGLY ACCUSED SYNDROME - DISORDERED THINKING (WAS-DT) of the
falsely
accused...

"I must also note that these are often extremely difficult clients.
Some people just will not be helped. These people tend to blame
others
for their problems, and in the end those working on their legal
problems are no more immune from their wrath that everyone else in
their lives. You often take these cases at some risk a small
percentage will “badmouth” you no matter how big the win you bring
them. Gratitude is not part of the personality profile of most WAS-DT
clients."

4. Newsgroups: alt.support.child-protective-services
From: Dan Sullivan <dsull...@optonline.net>
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 07:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, May 17 2009 9:57 am
Subject: Re: ken pangborn of the a-team says "it is fair to say" of
the falsely accused... “normal people don’t get accused of these
things.”

http://www.a-team.org/wrongly_accused.html

"It is fair to say, however unpopular it may be, that “normal people
don’t get accused of these things.” As much as people facing
accusations want to see themselves as “normal” when we look at their
profiles on psychological testing we see clear trait patterns for the
people facing the allegations."

Paragraph 8, "GENERAL INFORMATION."

krp

unread,
May 18, 2009, 4:38:22 AM5/18/09
to

"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:8c80ee93-8f9a-47d7...@v4g2000vba.googlegroups.com...

DJS> I don't care if ken can read my messages or not.

Sure you DO, chickenshit!

<chicken clucking sounds playing loudly>


whitevamp

unread,
May 18, 2009, 7:01:54 AM5/18/09
to
On May 18, 3:38 am, "krp" <kr...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message

DInnertime for you Kennie? Or are you chicken fukkkking again?

Greegor

unread,
May 19, 2009, 1:24:57 AM5/19/09
to
Help him Moe! LOL

krp

unread,
May 19, 2009, 4:29:57 AM5/19/09
to

"Greegor" <Gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:311a8223-842c-434c...@u10g2000vbd.googlegroups.com...

> Help him Moe! LOL


Well Greg, Danny certainly has MANIFOLD problems, doesn't he?

Greegor

unread,
May 19, 2009, 2:27:20 PM5/19/09
to
G > Help him Moe!   LOL

KRP > Well Greg, Danny certainly has MANIFOLD problems, doesn't he?

As the COMMA COP he certainly does!

Greegor

unread,
May 20, 2009, 3:08:56 PM5/20/09
to

Do you suppose Dan was using that Puppet Bear condom
on his daughter's Manifold?

Why do you suppose Dan raised his claim from
15+ child abuse investigations to 20+ ?

He also himmed and hawed about how
many different people turned in those
20+ reports. At one point he tried to say
they were all instigated by his ex-wife
but later he avoided such assertions.

Isn't that interesting?

I STILL say that there must be something
about Dan besides his winning ways that
we see in the newsgroups, something to
cause so many people to turn in child
abuse reports.

Is Dan a flamboyant gay cross dresser?

What is it about Dan that gives off such vibrations?

whitevamp

unread,
May 20, 2009, 5:38:21 PM5/20/09
to

Your vibrator up your ass greg?

Moe
Proud daughter of a war veteran
The real Ken Pangborn-- htttp:// www.aboutkenpangborn.com

Greegor

unread,
May 20, 2009, 7:18:29 PM5/20/09
to
On May 20, 4:38 pm, whitevamp <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 20, 2:08 pm, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 19, 1:27 pm, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > G > Help him Moe!   LOL
>
> > > KRP > Well Greg, Danny certainly has MANIFOLD problems, doesn't he?
>
> > > As the COMMA COP he certainly does!
>
> > Do you suppose Dan was using that Puppet Bear condom
> > on his daughter's Manifold?
>
> > Why do you suppose Dan raised his claim from
> > 15+ child abuse investigations to 20+ ?
>
> > He also himmed and hawed about how
> > many different people turned in those
> > 20+ reports.  At one point he tried to say
> > they were all instigated by his ex-wife
> > but later he avoided such assertions.
>
> > Isn't that interesting?
>
> > I STILL say that there must be something
> > about Dan besides his winning ways that
> > we see in the newsgroups, something to
> > cause so many people to turn in child
> > abuse reports.

G > Is Dan a flamboyant gay cross dresser?

G > What is it about Dan that gives off such vibrations?

Moe >  Your vibrator up your ass greg?

Keep ""Helping"" Dan, That one actually didn't bury him.
LOL

whitevamp

unread,
May 20, 2009, 11:07:09 PM5/20/09
to

It was aimed at you Greg not at Dan.

You idiot.
The vibratior is up YOUR ass while Kennie's dick is in your mouth.

Greegor

unread,
May 20, 2009, 11:22:05 PM5/20/09
to
G > Help him Moe!   LOL

KRP > Well Greg, Danny certainly has MANIFOLD problems, doesn't he?

G > As the COMMA COP he certainly does!

> > > > Do you suppose Dan was using that Puppet Bear condom
> > > > on his daughter's Manifold?
>
> > > > Why do you suppose Dan raised his claim from
> > > > 15+ child abuse investigations to 20+ ?
>
> > > > He also himmed and hawed about how
> > > > many different people turned in those
> > > > 20+ reports.  At one point he tried to say
> > > > they were all instigated by his ex-wife
> > > > but later he avoided such assertions.
>
> > > > Isn't that interesting?
>
> > > > I STILL say that there must be something
> > > > about Dan besides his winning ways that
> > > > we see in the newsgroups, something to
> > > > cause so many people to turn in child
> > > > abuse reports.

G > Is Dan a flamboyant gay cross dresser?

G > What is it about Dan that gives off such vibrations?

Moe >  Your vibrator up your ass greg?

G > Keep ""Helping"" Dan, That one actually didn't bury him.
G > LOL

Moe > It was aimed at you Greg not at Dan.
Moe > You idiot.
Moe > The vibratior is up YOUR ass while Kennie's
Moe > dick is in your mouth.

Dan got 20+ Child Abuse reports.
Did you really think you were ""helping"" him, Moe?

krp

unread,
May 21, 2009, 4:58:06 AM5/21/09
to

"Greegor" <Gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:128140f5-ca99-4924...@q2g2000vbr.googlegroups.com...

> > > G > Help him Moe! LOL
>
> > > KRP > Well Greg, Danny certainly has MANIFOLD problems, doesn't he?
>
> > > As the COMMA COP he certainly does!
>
> > Do you suppose Dan was using that Puppet Bear condom
> > on his daughter's Manifold?
>
> > Why do you suppose Dan raised his claim from
> > 15+ child abuse investigations to 20+ ?
>
> > He also himmed and hawed about how
> > many different people turned in those
> > 20+ reports. At one point he tried to say
> > they were all instigated by his ex-wife
> > but later he avoided such assertions.
>
> > Isn't that interesting?
>
> > I STILL say that there must be something
> > about Dan besides his winning ways that
> > we see in the newsgroups, something to
> > cause so many people to turn in child
> > abuse reports.

G > Is Dan a flamboyant gay cross dresser?

G > What is it about Dan that gives off such vibrations?

Moe > Your vibrator up your ass greg?

GH> Keep ""Helping"" Dan, That one actually didn't bury him.

Poor Dan - he is off licking his "MANIFOLD" wounds and sulking in his
basement.

0 new messages