On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 04:29:25 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <greego
...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>[Snip to focus on Greg's LIE]
>>>Moe > You might want to actually get off your butt
>>>Moe > and clean your apartment, piggy-boy.
>>>http://s212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/?action=view&cu...
>>>[ Photo taken from TeeVee show "Hoarders". ]
>> That picture was taken with cell phone, Greg. No amount of your
>>LYING will alter this TRUTH.
>> Clearly you're upset that someone sent me a picture of your
>>trashed out slum apartment. You wouldn't try and LIE about the
>>picture if it weren't your apartment.
>Kent Wills lies.
Anyone with an interest can check the link and see that you've
lied once again, Greg. The picture is not from any television show.
Why LIE and claim it is? Why LIE when your lie is exposed?
The answer to both is obvious.
The picture linked above is of your current slum apartment and
you're very upset that someone you thought you could trust sent it out
to me, and possibly others. If it were someone else's apartment, you
wouldn't have felt the need to LIE and claim it's from a television
show when you knew your lie will be exposed. You wouldn't claim my
pointing out that it's not a screen cap from a TV show, but a picture
from a cell phone camera is a lie when you know I'll be able to expose
the lie.
>Kent has rotated through various types of denials,
>some of which are not compatible with the others.
I've never altered my denial of your claim that the image linked
above is from a cell phone and not a TV show.
Please prove your claim that I've rotated through various types
of denials regarding your trashed out slum apartment, some of which
are not compatible with the others.
Unless you've offered more PROOF that you are psychologically
INCAPABLE of being honest intentionally, except when you think it may
help promote one or more of your lies, you'll offer the evidence.
You will, of course, run away to HIDE from this matter, or
attempt to distract from it. You'll NEVER address the TRUTH that
another of your MANY lies has been exposed.
>Kent used a few stooges and socks to help him
>try to sell his false denials. The funniest part is
>that Kent's APPEAL reflects the same kind of
>idiocy that Kent tries on usenet.
What appeal, Greg? Since you admitted I have no convictions, I
can't have an appeal.
Having had your own appeal filed for one of your convictions for
BEATING Donna, your ex-wife, you already KNOW this.
BTW, you have yet to explain what evidence was presented at trial
that so completely and properly PROVED you guilty of BEATING your ex
that arguments for your appeal were REFUSED. In fact, you've run away
each and every time you've been asked.
[Snip of items you've openly admitted are not about me]
Have you ever had any means of deception work for you, Greg?
Ever?
Information about inmate 1104135, Gregory Scott Hanson, wife and child
abuser:
Proof that inmate 1104135, Gregory Scott Hanson doesn't think he's
bound by criminal or civil law (note he's listed as the defendant in
each case):
Case ID Title Name DOB Role
06571 AGCR015216 STATE OF IOWA VS HANSON, GREG SCOTT HANSON GREGORY
05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SCSC123709 FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INS CO VS GREGORY SCOTT HANSON
HANSON GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SCSC139229 EAGLE PROP MGT VS GREGORY HANSON & LISA WATKINS
HANSON GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SCSC139230 EAGLE PROP MGT VS GREGORY HANSON & LISA WATKINS
HANSON GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SCSC141447 EAGLE PROPERTY MNGT VS LISA WATKINS ET AL HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SCSC141448 EAGLE PROPERTY MNGT VS LISA WATKINS ET AL HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SMSM004543 STATE OF IOWA VS HANSON, GREG SCOTT HANSON GREGORY
05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 SMSM008629 STATE OF IOWA VS HANSON, GREGORY S HANSON GREGORY
05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 STCR429489 STATE OF IOWA vs HANSON, GREGORY SCOTT HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571 STCR441449 STATE OF IOWA vs HANSON, GREGORY SCOTT HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571CRSTCR146191 CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS vs HANSON, GREGORY SCOTT HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571CRSTCR214087 CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS vs HANSON, GREGORY SCOTT HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
06571MASTWG261061 CITY OF MARION vs HANSON, GREGORY SCOTT HANSON
GREGORY 05/22/1959 DEFENDANT
Which of these women is Lisa Rene Watkins:
http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/8b1234bd.jpg
"I am Bob Larson."
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson offering more proof that he is
as mentally ill as he presents.
Message-ID:
<df610804-da3b-4aa8-aad0-638da7588...@cu4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly
Wiggly" Hanson (They are so accurate, Greg compared them the comment
that water is wet):
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by
attacking my first wife (deceased).
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser:
"Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child
abuser
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
Path:
news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.goo gle.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Greegor <greego...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-pr otective-services
With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching
into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon,
videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I
was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with
water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out
a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she
gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you
were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?"
She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I
prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed
triumphantly.
--a true story
As of Wednesday, August 31, 2011:
SMALL CLAIMS ORIGINAL NOTICE
Comments: OPA $2805.04
COPIES TO PA
VERIFICATION OF ACCOUNT
JUDGEMENT DEFAULT
Comments: JUDGMENT AGAINST GREGORY HANSON FOR $2805.04
+ INTEREST AT 7.271% FROM 8/6/98 & $45.00 COSTS.
Comments: NOTE OF GARN/NOTE TO DEFT SERV 9/24/98 BY WCSD
TO SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (ED POLKERS) FOR GREG HANSON
FEES $35.60
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson has a Garnishment order against
him. There is nothing to even suggest any of the money legally owed
has been paid. The SoL on the order has likely expired, but Greg still
can't risk getting a job due to it.
