ken pangborn calls his ONLY supporter on the news groups, grag hanson, "an average schlub." With schlub meaning a person who is clumsy, stupid or unattractive.
Dan Sullivan
krp
"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4ae62a53$0$31283$607e...@cv.net...
> With friends like ken pangborn...
Danny claims I called Greg a "SCHLUB." HE LIES. I used the word
"SCHMUCK" and not necessarily in the negative way that PROFESSOR SULLIVAN
wants to read it.
Okay - let's get to the point *I* was making. Sullivan and his little
gang of 4 were attacking Greg incessantly for some of the serious errors in
judgment he made, for example allowing his lawyer to talk him into accepting
a "nolo" plea when he was innocent. I made the reference to Greg being a
"somewhat below average schmuck" because he is not real sophisticated when
it comes to being exploited by devious people. Greg hasn't had a real good
employment history. He's not a stupid man.But he is also NOT a Harvard grad.
He's just an average guy who is a bit of an under-achiever in the material
sense of that term. There are worse things than being a "schmuck," for
example you could be a bitter hate riddles asshole like Dan Sullivan. A
pathological liar like Sullivan and his pals Moore and Wills. By that
standard Greg Hanson stands like a giant compared to the 3 princes of
negativity. He's outgunned but he still fights, and more often than not WINS
against the odds these clowns throw at him. There is more to admire in Greg
than in ANYTHING Dan Sullivan's 61 year life of NON-ACCOMPLISHMENT!
Sullivan admits that his ONLY accomplishment in life - the *ONLY* thing he
has done is to slander Greg and Myself. Other than that, Sullivan admits
his life is a ZERO. He has all sorts of rationalizations of WHY he feels
justified in his vengeful life. If you believe in a God, and a day of
judgment, I am glad that I won't have to answer the things that Sullivan
will be made to account for. Meanwhile whatever LIES Sullivan NEEDS ( and it
IS a psychological NEED he has) to say about me is something that I just
deal with as I must.
Dan Sullivan
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>
> news:4ae62a53$0$31283$607e...@cv.net...
>
> > With friends like ken pangborn...
>
> Danny claims I called Greg a "SCHLUB." HE LIES.
No, pangborn YOU LIE.
You absolutely DID call grag a "schlub."
> I used the word
> "SCHMUCK" and not necessarily in the negative way that PROFESSOR SULLIVAN
> wants to read it.
Schmuck is a Yiddish slang word for penis.
So pangborn thinks grag is a penis... but he doesn't mean that in a
negative way.
pangborn thinks grag is a penis in the GOOD WAY?
<<<snip the pangborn BS>>>
> Meanwhile whatever LIES Sullivan NEEDS ( and it
> IS a psychological NEED he has) to say about me is something that I just
> deal with as I must.
Am I lying when I say that you called grag a schlub, pangborn?
The message I'm replying to, written by you, has you claiming "Danny
claims I called Greg a "SCHLUB." HE LIES."
Is that statement of yours true?
The fact is, any way you answer that is a LIE.
krp
> > With friends like ken pangborn...
>
> Danny claims I called Greg a "SCHLUB." HE LIES.
No, pangborn YOU LIE.
You absolutely DID call grag a "schlub."
> I used the word "SCHMUCK" and not necessarily in the negative way that
> PROFESSOR SULLIVAN
> wants to read it.
DJS#3> Schmuck is a Yiddish slang word for penis.
Do I look like I am Yiddish,Danny boy?
DJS#3> pangborn thinks grag is a penis... but he doesn't mean that in a
negative way.
DJS#3> pangborn thinks grag is a penis in the GOOD WAY?
YOU are the one with the PENIS fixation. Maybe because your homo
boyfriend Moore brought up his DRY PENIS SKIN problem? Maybe you and Moore
should GET A ROOM where you can "blow each other's" minds.
Dan Sullivan
> ATTORNEY AT LAW (in his dreams)"Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>
> news:3a46b452-8716-4faf...@q14g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > With friends like ken pangborn...
>
> > Danny claims I called Greg a "SCHLUB." HE LIES.
>
>
> DS - You absolutely DID call grag a "schlub."
Your lack of denial is noted, pangborn.
> > I used the word "SCHMUCK" and not necessarily in the negative way that
> > PROFESSOR SULLIVAN
> > wants to read it.
>
> DJS#3> Schmuck is a Yiddish slang word for penis.
>
> Do I look like I am Yiddish,Danny boy?
No, you don't even look human.
More like a steaming cow pie that's been heated up in the sun.
> DJS#3> pangborn thinks grag is a penis... but he doesn't mean that in a
> negative way.
> DJS#3> pangborn thinks grag is a penis in the GOOD WAY?
>
> YOU are the one with the PENIS fixation.
YOU'RE the one who called grag a penis, pangborn.
Why are you using words when you don't know what they mean?
Did you call grag hanson a schlub without knowing what schlub means?
Kent Wills
<dsul...@optonline.net> wrote:
[...]
>> I used the word
>> "SCHMUCK" and not necessarily in =A0the negative way that PROFESSOR SULLI=
>VAN
>> wants to read it.
>
>Schmuck is a Yiddish slang word for penis.
>
>So pangborn thinks grag is a penis... but he doesn't mean that in a
>negative way.
>
>pangborn thinks grag is a penis in the GOOD WAY?
>
><<<snip the pangborn BS>>>
>
>> Meanwhile whatever LIES Sullivan NEEDS ( and it
>> IS a psychological NEED he has) to say about me is something that I just
>> deal with as I must.
>
>Am I lying when I say that you called grag a schlub, pangborn?
>
>The message I'm replying to, written by you, has you claiming "Danny
>claims I called Greg a "SCHLUB." HE LIES."
>
>Is that statement of yours true?
>
>The fact is, any way you answer that is a LIE.
Pangborn often paints himself into a metaphorical corner.
I've tried to point out to him that if he would just be honest,
he wouldn't get caught lying. At the time I write this, there is
nothing to indicate I've managed to get this point across to him.
"(CONTEXT REMOVED AS TO THE BELOW CLAIM)"
Kenneth Robert Pangborn admitting he alters the context of posts
when he replies.
MID FyUom.1363$Jd7....@nwrddc02.gnilink.net
Kent Wills
wrote:
>> I used the word "SCHMUCK" and not necessarily in the negative way that
>> PROFESSOR SULLIVAN
>> wants to read it.
>
>DJS#3> Schmuck is a Yiddish slang word for penis.
>
> Do I look like I am Yiddish,Danny boy?
Your proved bigotry likely includes anything Jewish, so knowing
anything about one of the languages associated with the Jewish people
is probably something you would avoid.
>
>DJS#3> pangborn thinks grag is a penis... but he doesn't mean that in a
>negative way.
>DJS#3> pangborn thinks grag is a penis in the GOOD WAY?
>
> YOU are the one with the PENIS fixation.
Pangborn, you can't go for more than a few days without
expressing your desire for male sexual companionship.
Will you ever be able to accept that no one cares that you're a
homosexual?
>Maybe because your homo
>boyfriend Moore brought up his DRY PENIS SKIN problem? Maybe you and Moore
>should GET A ROOM where you can "blow each other's" minds.
You do like to express your fondness for homoerotic imagery.
"I am insane!"
--Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP Consulting and The A-team,
posting to alt.dads-rights.unmoderated claiming that he was found
legally insane.
krp
"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7hvfe51583jigbfdo...@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:34:10 -0400, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
> wrote:
>
>>> I used the word "SCHMUCK" and not necessarily in the negative way that
>>> PROFESSOR SULLIVAN
>>> wants to read it.
>>
>>DJS#3> Schmuck is a Yiddish slang word for penis.
>>
>> Do I look like I am Yiddish,Danny boy?
>
> Your proved bigotry likely includes anything Jewish, so knowing
> anything about one of the languages associated with the Jewish people
> is probably something you would avoid.
Oh Bullshit, Wills, as ever your POLACK comes out. My high school sweetheart
was Jewish. I work with several Jewish lawyers and have for over 30 years.
Most of my closest friends are Jewish, AND I have been to more Bar Mitzvah's
and Bat Mitzvah's then you can shake a stick at. Your BEST LOVER, David
Moore, however is the one who hates Jews. Try again, Wills, you are just a
pathological liar.
krp
On Oct 27, 1:34 pm, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> ATTORNEY AT LAW (in his dreams)"Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net>
> wrote in message
>
> news:3a46b452-8716-4faf...@q14g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > With friends like ken pangborn...
>
> > Danny claims I called Greg a "SCHLUB." HE LIES.
>
> DS - No, pangborn YOU LIE.
>
> DS - You absolutely DID call grag a "schlub."
DJS#3> Your lack of denial is noted, pangborn.
Muist I deny every bity of your INSANE BULLSHIT? Just denying every
aspect of your lies in ONE of your posts would take me a week. I did not
call Greg a "schlub" I called him an average "schmuck" (meaning to the
LITERATE FOLKS an average guy.) Which explains YOUR problems Danny. I can
take pity on you not having the vocabulary to understand TOUGH words like
"Manifold" but you don't wven understand little words like "we" and "our."
So I can understand, giben your mental problems, why you have to misread
"schmuck" into soemthing that you DESPERATEL:Y NEED it to mean. Its your
"MANYFOLD" problem rearing its ugly head again.
Dan Sullivan
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>
> news:05a36cbe-e7ec-41a6...@u36g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 27, 1:34 pm, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
> > ATTORNEY AT LAW (in his dreams)"Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net>
> > wrote in message
>
> >news:3a46b452-8716-4faf...@q14g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > > With friends like ken pangborn...
>
> > > Danny claims I called Greg a "SCHLUB." HE LIES.
>
> > DS - No, pangborn YOU LIE.
>
> > DS - You absolutely DID call grag a "schlub."
>
> DJS#3> Your lack of denial is noted, pangborn.
>
> Muist I deny every bity of your INSANE BULLSHIT? Just denying every
> aspect of your lies in ONE of your posts would take me a week. I did not
> call Greg a "schlub"
Liar.
===========
Newsgroups: alt.support.child-protective-services
From: "krp" <kr...@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 11:00:49 GMT
Local: Sat, Apr 4 2009 7:00 am
Subject: Re: Greg wants " below average" link, Well HERE IT IS!!! IT'S
MAUREEN MCCALISTER!
<<<snip>>>
MOE THE SLOW> You said it Kennie. You went on a rant on me and LET
SLIP
WHAT YOU
MOE THE SLOW> REALLY THINK OF GREG!!!
Yeah pretty much Moe. I see Greg as pretty much the average
schlub. Not
a great deal of guile
================
> I called him an average "schmuck" (meaning to the
> LITERATE FOLKS an average guy.)
To literate folks you called grag an average penis (schmuck).
And schlub means clumsy stupid or unattractive person.
So you consider grag an unattractive penis?
How about from now on you use words that you understand, pangborn.
Farschstein?
Greegor
Did you know she was BIPOLAR before the first baby?
Yes or no?
How big of a concern did you think her mental illness
was, when she was pregnant with a child you fathered?
How many of your girlfriends were mental cases?
Where did you find her?
Did you troll the psych ward or what?
Is your current wife, Susan a mental case as well?
Dan Sullivan
>
> Dan, Why did you make babies with a freakin mental case?
grag, why didn't your wife divorce you after the first time you were
convicted of abusing her?
How long was it between your first conviction and your second??
Was it your second conviction that precipitated your divorce from her?
Is your ex-wife aware that you're listed on the Iowa State Child Abuse
Registry?
Are your neighbors aware you're listed on the Iowa State Child Abuse
Registry?
Greegor
G > Dan, Why did you make babies with a freakin mental case?
G >
G > Did you know she was BIPOLAR before the first baby?
G > Yes or no?
G >
G > How big of a concern did you think her mental illness
G > was, when she was pregnant with a child you fathered?
G >
G > How many of your girlfriends were mental cases?
G > Where did you find her?
G > Did you troll the psych ward or what?
G > Is your current wife, Susan a mental case as well?
Dan?
Were you a PATIENT yourself?
Dan Sullivan
> Dan, Why did you make babies with a freakin mental case?
grag, why didn't your wife divorce you after the first time you were
freedom
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, krp <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>news:4ae62a53$0$31283$607e...@cv.net...
>
>> With friends like ken pangborn...
>
> Danny claims I called Greg a "SCHLUB." HE LIES. I used the word
>"SCHMUCK" and not necessarily in the negative way that PROFESSOR SULLIVAN
>wants to read it.
>
> Okay - let's get to the point *I* was making. Sullivan and his little
>gang of 4 were attacking Greg incessantly for some of the serious errors in
>judgment he made, for example allowing his lawyer to talk him into accepting
>a "nolo" plea when he was innocent.
You call watching an unrelated 7 year old girl take a cold shower
"innocent"?
> I made the reference to Greg being a
>"somewhat below average schmuck" because he is not real sophisticated when
>it comes to being exploited by devious people.
ROFL! You would know this better than anyone, considering the way you
exploit him and ghostwrite his posts for him.
> Greg hasn't had a real good employment history.
Many employers these days frown on applicants who abuse children.
> He's not a stupid man.
He has an IQ of 60 on a good day.
>But he is also NOT a Harvard grad.
>He's just an average guy who is a bit of an under-achiever in the material
>sense of that term. There are worse things than being a "schmuck," for
>example you could be a bitter hate riddles asshole like Dan Sullivan. A
>pathological liar like Sullivan and his pals Moore and Wills.
And yet, you've been unable to prove that I've told a single lie.
> By that
>standard Greg Hanson stands like a giant compared to the 3 princes of
>negativity. He's outgunned but he still fights, and more often than not WINS
>against the odds these clowns throw at him.
"Wins"? ROFL! He does nothing but repeatedly spam the same lies over and
over....in many cases, after they've already been disproven. Case in
point.....the false child abuse case against the David Moore in Indiana,
which was DISMISSED nearly two years ago already.
>There is more to admire in Greg
>than in ANYTHING Dan Sullivan's 61 year life of NON-ACCOMPLISHMENT!
>Sullivan admits that his ONLY accomplishment in life - the *ONLY* thing he
>has done is to slander Greg and Myself. Other than that, Sullivan admits
>his life is a ZERO.
Got a link to a post where he "admitted" this? As I've caught you
repeatedly, falsely attributing similar things to me which I never said,
you'll understand if I don't just take your word for it.
He has all sorts of rationalizations of WHY he feels
>justified in his vengeful life. If you believe in a God, and a day of
>judgment, I am glad that I won't have to answer the things that Sullivan
>will be made to account for. Meanwhile whatever LIES Sullivan NEEDS ( and it
>IS a psychological NEED he has) to say about me is something that I just
>deal with as I must.
Wow, talk about projection....
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
criminals
"[I have] [n]ever had [any] standing in the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyer's
Association or AN Y connection to them."
- --Ken Pangborn in a usenet post on January 1, 2009, denying affiliation
with the TCDLA, to whom he provided bogus educational credentials. His lie
is disproved here:
http://web.archive.org/web/20060822021821/www.tcdla.com/secure/experts/inde
x.shtml
"Some photo of some girl without even any documentation on THAT only proves
that YOU are a PSYCHO! A really STUPID one at that!"
- --Ken Pangborn, admitting to being a "stupid" "psycho" in message-ID
<jOp3l.292$Es4...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>
"The FACT is that [my mail-order wife Barbara Sanciprian] and I were
introduced in the FORMAL Spanish tradition by mutual friends, and were
married first in Cuba after 2 year courtship."
- --Ken Pangborn, admitting that he began cheating on his wife Peggy on
September 28, 2001, nearly two years before she separated from him
"I'm David Moore and I am insane!"
- --Ken Pangborn posting to alt.dads-rights.unmoderated, attempting to
claim that his name is David Moore
"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll cripple
you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out, I'll be able to walk,
but you will still be a cripple."
- --Pangborn puppet Greg Hanson of alt.support.child-protective-services
**, in a verbal threat to his girlfriend
** - this conclusion was reached via applying Ken and Greg's logic
Keywords: false allegations,sexual abuse,marital rape, date rape, sexual
harassment,child abuse,domestic violence,rape allegations,false allegations
of child abuse,false rape allegations,false abuse accusations,false
accusations,recovered memories,child sexual abuse,abuse child,sexual
assault,child molestation,reactive attachment disorder,penile
plethysmograph,polygraph,attorneys,divorce,visitation,pedophiles
More-keywords: KRP CONSULTING. False allegations of child abuse, false
abuse accusations, false domestic violence allegations help, false rape
allegations, abuse child, sexual abuse, child sexual abuse, false
allegations, false accusations, recovered memories, sexual assault, child
molestation, child sexual abuse, reactive attachment disorder, penile
plethysmograph, polygraph, trial consulting, jury consulting, jury
selection, jury voire dire, wrongful allegations, false child sexual abuse
allegations. Wrongful child sexual abuse allegations. Domestic Violence.
Rape. Marital rape. Date Rape. Confidence Rape.
Yet-more-keywords: ken pangborn,kenneth pangborn,barbara pangborn,barbara
sanciprian,palm harbor,tampa,attorneys,florida lawyers,florida
attorneys,tampa lawyers,tampa attorneys,trial consultant,trial
consulting,dui,domestic violence,vawa,abuse,3648 cockatoo,new port
richey,ernesto sanciprian,ernesto miguel blanco sanciprian,blanco
sanciprian,bryce carter,holguin,julio aguilar,yudith bacallao,raimundo
cabrera,ana hernandez chi,lixandro cordero,leandis diaz,al faisbuker,wendy
gil,armando capo ramos,george riveron,reinaldo rodriguez,lexis ross,liana
yisell alvarez silveira,madelyn tamayo,manuel toledo,thais valdes
Extra-keywords: Julito Sainz,craig clawson,lia yisell
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQCVAwUBSub1VMWdjev37kExAQH6dAP/aEhRo4i7Anl1napZEuJPF0in3orVH+Jb
m4tFiJhMZ7GBJVh5eVKEzNqlyvTfeWgpHHG1mGGxqgYjSlsnjmzv3q7bqrI1OY2y
wlISnOFzd5eBg2ph89487IE621ExayqD7SlFsifSKf0SYEMX0X0UmQWY30g3cjhW
P925OHYykeM=
=Vb0h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Dan Sullivan
"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
news:9904d6704242f3c2...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, krp <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>>"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>>news:4ae62a53$0$31283$607e...@cv.net...
>>
>>> With friends like ken pangborn...
>>
>> Danny claims I called Greg a "SCHLUB." HE LIES. I used the word
>>"SCHMUCK" and not necessarily in the negative way that PROFESSOR SULLIVAN
>>wants to read it.
>>
>> Okay - let's get to the point *I* was making. Sullivan and his little
>>gang of 4 were attacking Greg incessantly for some of the serious errors
>>in
>>judgment he made, for example allowing his lawyer to talk him into
>>accepting
>>a "nolo" plea when he was innocent.
>
> You call watching an unrelated 7 year old girl take a cold shower
> "innocent"?
grag claimed he was in the bathroom because he needed to hand the little
girl a towel when she was finished showering, as if she couldn't take a
towel off the towel rack herself.
grag also forced the little girl to take cold showers as punishment for
wetting her pants.
he also spanked her.
he said he had the mother's permission for all of this so it wasn't a
problem.
Even more pathetic is the fact that grag drove the little girl around Cedar
Rapids so she could collect bottles and cans for the deposit money, which
grag claimed was HIS contribution to the household expenses.
BTW pangborn did call grag a schlub as well as a schmuck.
Dan Sullivan
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:05a36cbe-e7ec-41a6...@u36g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 27, 1:34 pm, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> > ATTORNEY AT LAW (in his dreams)"Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net>
> > wrote in message
> >news:3a46b452-8716-4faf...@q14g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
> > > > With friends like ken pangborn...
> > > Danny claims I called Greg a "SCHLUB." HE LIES.
> > DS - No, pangborn YOU LIE.
krp
>
>> > > > With friends like ken pangborn...
>
>> > > Danny claims I called Greg a "SCHLUB." HE LIES.
>
>> > DS - No, pangborn YOU LIE.
>
>> > DS - You absolutely DID call grag a "schlub."
>
>> DJS#3> Your lack of denial is noted, pangborn.
>
>> aspect of your lies in ONE of your posts would take me a week. I did not
>> call Greg a "schlub"
>
> Liar.
Oh golly, so I said he was an "average" schlub with NO GUILE, unlike you in
the Gang of 4.
BFD
At least I know what Manifold means as well as words like "our" and
"we."
krp
"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
news:9904d6704242f3c2...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> With friends like ken pangborn...
>>
>> Danny claims I called Greg a "SCHLUB." HE LIES. I used the word
>>"SCHMUCK" and not necessarily in the negative way that PROFESSOR SULLIVAN
>>wants to read it.
>>
>> Okay - let's get to the point *I* was making. Sullivan and his little
>>gang of 4 were attacking Greg incessantly for some of the serious errors
>>in
>>judgment he made, for example allowing his lawyer to talk him into
>>accepting
>>a "nolo" plea when he was innocent.
> You call watching an unrelated 7 year old girl take a cold shower
> "innocent"?
Moore always prince of distortions. He "gave" the kid a cold shower.
"Innocent?" Well let's look at it. NO allegations of ANY "sexual" touching.
So I guess "innocent" would be an issue in the eyes of the beholder. It
seems that a "SOCIAL WORKER" didn't like it. Given the reality of "social
worker's" opinions, I for one am not particularly impressed by what "shocks"
a "social worker." That's the same bunch who CLAIM, "Children NEVER lie" and
"the ONLY reason a father would have his daughter sit on his lap is for the
proximity of his penis to her vagina." No, Davey, they's have to show me
lots more before I leap to the conslusion YOU and your pals want to make.
Lots of step-parents help the kids take showers especially when HYGIENE is
an issue. And the mom is right there.
>> He's not a stupid man.
> He has an IQ of 60 on a good day.
How typical of you, Moore. Greg is considerable smarter than YOUR foil,
Wills the useful idiot that you play like a penny slot machine.
>>But he is also NOT a Harvard grad.
>>He's just an average guy who is a bit of an under-achiever in the material
>>sense of that term. There are worse things than being a "schmuck," for
>>example you could be a bitter hate riddles asshole like Dan Sullivan. A
>>pathological liar like Sullivan and his pals Moore and Wills.
> And yet, you've been unable to prove that I've told a single lie.
How about your claim that I was kicked out of ASTC, Davey? That was just
a few days ago. You claimed that you KNEW I was kicked out because of
"racism" and hatred for women. KNEW IT, you said. YET that was and IS a lie,
isn't it Davey. 2nd year in a row you fell for the old "ROPE A DOPE." You
just HAD to make false claims. It's a compulsion in you.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:7hvfe51583jigbfdo...@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:34:10 -0400, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> I used the word "SCHMUCK" and not necessarily in the negative way that
>>>> PROFESSOR SULLIVAN
>>>> wants to read it.
>>>
>>>DJS#3> Schmuck is a Yiddish slang word for penis.
>>>
>>> Do I look like I am Yiddish,Danny boy?
>>
>> Your proved bigotry likely includes anything Jewish, so knowing
>> anything about one of the languages associated with the Jewish people
>> is probably something you would avoid.
>
>Oh Bullshit, Wills, as ever your POLACK comes out.
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com/race.html
"you are reading Moore's SELECTIVE material that is HIGHLY edited."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn claiming in misc.legal that David Moore can
and does edit Google's Usenet archive.
Message-ID: <n9Sfm.1372$nh2...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>
Kent Wills
<about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, krp <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>>"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>>news:4ae62a53$0$31283$607e...@cv.net...
>>
>>> With friends like ken pangborn...
>>
>> Danny claims I called Greg a "SCHLUB." HE LIES. I used the word
>>"SCHMUCK" and not necessarily in the negative way that PROFESSOR SULLIVAN
>>wants to read it.
>>
>> Okay - let's get to the point *I* was making. Sullivan and his little
>>gang of 4 were attacking Greg incessantly for some of the serious errors in
>>judgment he made, for example allowing his lawyer to talk him into accepting
>>a "nolo" plea when he was innocent.
>
>You call watching an unrelated 7 year old girl take a cold shower
>"innocent"?
I think the plea was in regards to one of Greg's convictions for
BEATING his ex-wife.
If Greg were innocent, he would have taken the matter to trial.
Pleading guilty when one is innocent is something only a moron would
ever do.
The simple truth is, Greg was guilty and the plea was probably
better than he could hope to get had the matter gone to trial. Not
knowing the details of the plea, I can't actually know, but I would
expect such.
>
>> I made the reference to Greg being a
>>"somewhat below average schmuck" because he is not real sophisticated when
>>it comes to being exploited by devious people.
>
>ROFL! You would know this better than anyone, considering the way you
>exploit him and ghostwrite his posts for him.
He's not the only one. Or at least wasn't.
I miss getting Greg's posts hours before he posts them. It was
really great when the E-mail was almost verbatim to Greg's posts. If
not for the fact that I would get and read them BEFORE Greg posted
them, it could be claimed I was sent them later, with an altered time
stamp.
Sadly, I got and read them well before Greg posted them.
Contrary to what Greg wants people to think, I wasn't able to
destroy his ever argument "on the fly." I actually thought out my
replies, and found documentation to support my positions when
necessary.
>
>> Greg hasn't had a real good employment history.
>
>Many employers these days frown on applicants who abuse children.
>
And TWO convictions for beating their ex-wife.
>> He's not a stupid man.
>
>He has an IQ of 60 on a good day.
I doubt it's that low, but Greg consistently proves he has a
degree of mental retardation.
>
>>But he is also NOT a Harvard grad.
>>He's just an average guy who is a bit of an under-achiever in the material
>>sense of that term. There are worse things than being a "schmuck," for
>>example you could be a bitter hate riddles asshole like Dan Sullivan. A
>>pathological liar like Sullivan and his pals Moore and Wills.
>
>And yet, you've been unable to prove that I've told a single lie.
Kenneth Robert Pangborn frequently claims others have lied. He
has never been able to offer anything to support, let alone prove, any
claim of another having lied. To come close he is reduced to lying.
>
>> By that
>>standard Greg Hanson stands like a giant compared to the 3 princes of
>>negativity. He's outgunned but he still fights, and more often than not WINS
>>against the odds these clowns throw at him.
>
>"Wins"? ROFL! He does nothing but repeatedly spam the same lies over and
>over....in many cases, after they've already been disproven. Case in
>point.....the false child abuse case against the David Moore in Indiana,
>which was DISMISSED nearly two years ago already.
Ken has little choice. He can't think of anything new, so he
posts the same lies over and over.
If not for the fact that his being UNABLE to be honest, except by
accident or force, was so well known and documented, a civil suit
could be filed with a minor expectation of winning.
Since no mentally sound person would believe anything Ken
Pangborn claims without substantial proof, there's no realistic hope
of winning. No damages can be honestly claimed against the guy.
>
>>There is more to admire in Greg
>>than in ANYTHING Dan Sullivan's 61 year life of NON-ACCOMPLISHMENT!
>>Sullivan admits that his ONLY accomplishment in life - the *ONLY* thing he
>>has done is to slander Greg and Myself. Other than that, Sullivan admits
>>his life is a ZERO.
>
>Got a link to a post where he "admitted" this? As I've caught you
>repeatedly, falsely attributing similar things to me which I never said,
>you'll understand if I don't just take your word for it.
I have crickets on standby.
>
>
>He has all sorts of rationalizations of WHY he feels
>>justified in his vengeful life. If you believe in a God, and a day of
>>judgment, I am glad that I won't have to answer the things that Sullivan
>>will be made to account for. Meanwhile whatever LIES Sullivan NEEDS ( and it
>>IS a psychological NEED he has) to say about me is something that I just
>>deal with as I must.
>
>Wow, talk about projection....
I don't know that Pangborn NEEDS to lie. He has consistently
PROVED he prefers to lie, but I wouldn't go so far as to say he NEEDS
to do so.
His preference for lying is why I frequently point out he may
have been lying when he claimed to have been found legally insane and
that alcoholism was the cause. Either or both could be lies.
>
>http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
>The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
>criminals
>
"CPS cases are legal matters. Offering advice IS practicing law
without a license."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn admitting he practices law without a
license in misc.legal
Kent Wills
wrote:
>PROFESSOR
>"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>news:98aa3bab-b5a4-426b...@o36g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>> > > > With friends like ken pangborn...
>>
>>> > > Danny claims I called Greg a "SCHLUB." HE LIES.
>>
>>> > DS - No, pangborn YOU LIE.
>>
>>> > DS - You absolutely DID call grag a "schlub."
>>
>>> DJS#3> Your lack of denial is noted, pangborn.
>>
>>> Must I deny every bity of your INSANE BULLSHIT? Just denying every
>>> aspect of your lies in ONE of your posts would take me a week. I did not
>>> call Greg a "schlub"
>>
>> Liar.
>
>Oh golly, so I said he was an "average" schlub with NO GUILE, unlike you in
>the Gang of 4.
It's nice that you are able to admit he's far superior to Greg.
Not that being so is anything special.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>DAVID MOORE INTERNET PSYCHO
>"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
>news:9904d6704242f3c2...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>>>> With friends like ken pangborn...
>>>
>>> Danny claims I called Greg a "SCHLUB." HE LIES. I used the word
>>>"SCHMUCK" and not necessarily in the negative way that PROFESSOR SULLIVAN
>>>wants to read it.
>>>
>>> Okay - let's get to the point *I* was making. Sullivan and his little
>>>gang of 4 were attacking Greg incessantly for some of the serious errors
>>>in
>>>judgment he made, for example allowing his lawyer to talk him into
>>>accepting
>>>a "nolo" plea when he was innocent.
>
>> You call watching an unrelated 7 year old girl take a cold shower
>> "innocent"?
>
> Moore always prince of distortions. He "gave" the kid a cold shower.
Greg claims he hung out in the bathroom while she showered.
He may have been lying, of course.
>"Innocent?" Well let's look at it. NO allegations of ANY "sexual" touching.
Greg claims there was.
He claimed the allegation was that he touched her genital area
with his bare hand.
>So I guess "innocent" would be an issue in the eyes of the beholder. It
>seems that a "SOCIAL WORKER" didn't like it. Given the reality of "social
>worker's" opinions, I for one am not particularly impressed by what "shocks"
>a "social worker."
Few are. Of course, your below average schmuck (your words),
Greg, believes ANYTHING they say is 100% true and valid.
>That's the same bunch who CLAIM, "Children NEVER lie" and
>"the ONLY reason a father would have his daughter sit on his lap is for the
>proximity of his penis to her vagina." No, Davey, they's have to show me
>lots more before I leap to the conslusion YOU and your pals want to make.
No one has leaped. Greg made the claims.
He may have been lying, of course.
>Lots of step-parents help the kids take showers especially when HYGIENE is
>an issue. And the mom is right there.
Greg wasn't her step-father. No mention of Lisa being anywhere
around was made.
>
>>> He's not a stupid man.
>
>> He has an IQ of 60 on a good day.
>
> How typical of you, Moore. Greg is considerable smarter than YOUR foil,
>Wills the useful idiot that you play like a penny slot machine.
In what way do you propose David plays me?
Be specific and prepared to have any and all lies exposed.
If you'd rather just admit you're lying, saving everyone some
time, that would be nice.
>
>
>>>But he is also NOT a Harvard grad.
>>>He's just an average guy who is a bit of an under-achiever in the material
>>>sense of that term. There are worse things than being a "schmuck," for
>>>example you could be a bitter hate riddles asshole like Dan Sullivan. A
>>>pathological liar like Sullivan and his pals Moore and Wills.
>
>> And yet, you've been unable to prove that I've told a single lie.
>
> How about your claim that I was kicked out of ASTC, Davey? That was just
>a few days ago. You claimed that you KNEW I was kicked out because of
>"racism" and hatred for women. KNEW IT, you said.
I've seen no such post from David.
Post the MID and/or Google link to such a post, unless you're
lying.
>YET that was and IS a lie,
>isn't it Davey. 2nd year in a row you fell for the old "ROPE A DOPE." You
>just HAD to make false claims. It's a compulsion in you.
>
You already admitted your membership wasn't renewed because you
couldn't pay the dues on time.
Dan Sullivan
"krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:4ae94b3d$0$5680$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com...
> DAVID MOORE INTERNET PSYCHO
> "freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
> news:9904d6704242f3c2...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>>>> With friends like ken pangborn...
>>>
>>> Danny claims I called Greg a "SCHLUB." HE LIES. I used the word
>>>"SCHMUCK" and not necessarily in the negative way that PROFESSOR
>>>SULLIVAN
>>>wants to read it.
>>>
>>> Okay - let's get to the point *I* was making. Sullivan and his little
>>>gang of 4 were attacking Greg incessantly for some of the serious errors
>>>in
>>>judgment he made, for example allowing his lawyer to talk him into
>>>accepting
>>>a "nolo" plea when he was innocent.
>
>> You call watching an unrelated 7 year old girl take a cold shower
>> "innocent"?
>
> Moore always prince of distortions. He "gave" the kid a cold shower.
FORCED the little girl to take cold showers.
> "Innocent?" Well let's look at it. NO allegations of ANY "sexual"
> touching.
The little girl had to undergo a physical exam for sexual abuse.
> So I guess "innocent" would be an issue in the eyes of the beholder. It
> seems that a "SOCIAL WORKER" didn't like it.
grag liked it.
pangborn likes it.
> Given the reality of "social worker's" opinions, I for one am not
> particularly impressed by what "shocks" a "social worker."
As long as pangborn isn't the one under investigation.
> That's the same bunch who CLAIM, "Children NEVER lie" and "the ONLY
> reason a father would have his daughter sit on his lap is for the
> proximity of his penis to her vagina." No, Davey, they's have to show me
> lots more before I leap to the conslusion YOU and your pals want to make.
> Lots of step-parents help the kids take showers especially when HYGIENE is
> an issue. And the mom is right there.
grag forced the little girl into the cold showers when the mother was at
work.
Dan Sullivan
Greegor
DJS3 > grag hanson, "an average schlub." With schlub meaning a
DJS3 > person who is clumsy, stupid or unattractive.
KRP > I called him an average "schmuck" (meaning to the
KRP > LITERATE FOLKS an average guy.)
DJS3 > To literate folks you called grag an average penis (schmuck).
At least he didn't call me a schmekel!
Dan is obsessed with his EGO and his schvantz.
Any Low maedabeer avreet.
Dan Sullivan
Greegor
Dan Sullivan
krp
I am not convinced that post is genuine.
krp
That's what it means to YOU, Danny, like the "MANYFOLD" thingie. I'm not
convinced the post is genuine, it isn't a word I regularly use. And YOU have
something of a reputation for falsifying claims.
krp
>>> You call watching an unrelated 7 year old girl take a cold shower
>>> "innocent"?
>> Moore always prince of distortions. He "gave" the kid a cold shower.
>
> FORCED the little girl to take cold showers.
>> "Innocent?" Well let's look at it. NO allegations of ANY "sexual"
>> touching.
> The little girl had to undergo a physical exam for sexual abuse.
And it reavealed NONE, didn't it Danny boy?
>> So I guess "innocent" would be an issue in the eyes of the beholder. It
>> seems that a "SOCIAL WORKER" didn't like it.
> grag liked it.
Proof???
> pangborn likes it.
Now you are LYING and claiming *IK* nwas there? You're an INSANE PERVERT
Danny. You and your puppet bear condom demonstrations to little kids.
>> Given the reality of "social worker's" opinions, I for one am not
>> particularly impressed by what "shocks" a "social worker."
> As long as pangborn isn't the one under investigation.
Here's an IDEA Danny, why don't you make a report like your pal Moore
does on a frequent basis. See where it gets ya. Come on BADASS you claim to
have the PROOF - then you are OBLIGATED to make the REPORT. OR - yet again
be branded a LIAR!
Dan Sullivan
> convinced the post is genuine, it isn't a word I regularly use.
Obviously because you don't know what it means.
You admitted using the word "schmuck" and you don't know what it means
either.
Dan Sullivan
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>
> news:4ae9a921$0$22527$607e...@cv.net...
>
> >>> You call watching an unrelated 7 year old girl take a cold shower
> >>> "innocent"?
> >> Moore always prince of distortions. He "gave" the kid a cold shower.
>
> > FORCED the little girl to take cold showers.
> >> "Innocent?" Well let's look at it. NO allegations of ANY "sexual"
> >> touching.
> > The little girl had to undergo a physical exam for sexual abuse.
>
> And it reavealed NONE, didn't it Danny boy?
No evidence of penetration.
It does NOT mean grag didn't touch the little girl in a sexual manner.
Greegor
DJS3 > grag forced the little girl into the cold
DJS3 > showers when the mother was at work.
On what do you base this statement, Dan?
I see also that you are attempting to blame me
for the fact the CPS agency did a sex abuse
exam on a 7 year old girl with no probable cause.
While we're on the subject, Dan I should point
out that you were once FOUNDED by your state
CPS for sexual abuse, and I was never
founded for anything sexual.
You were investigated 20+ times and
marked FOUNDED 5 times, so HOW MANY
times did your little girl(s) have to undergo
vaginal sex abuse exams, Dan?
In point of fact, in our case there was no
"probable cause" to put a 7 year old through
that, and when we got Dr. Mengele on the
witness stand and asked if there was any
probable cause for the sex abuse exam
she extolled that she believes that EVERY
little girl in every CPS investigation should
undergo her gyno exam!
Why don't you tell us more about the VARIOUS
sex abuse exams your daughter(s) underwent
due to your 20+ investigations and 5 FOUNDEDS?
Why was it that you attracted SO MANY child
abuse reports, Dan? Is it something about
how you look? Or something about your lifestyle?
Do you feel responsibility or guilt about the
sex abuse exams your daughter/s underwent?
Tell us about the "credible evidence", Dan.
Dan Sullivan
Prove it isn't yours.
And then prove the rest of your posts in that thread aren't yours
either, pangborn.
Or were you responding to a discussion of what someone else with your
name posted about grag hanson?
Dan Sullivan
> On Oct 29, 9:39 am, "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
> DJS3 > grag forced the little girl into the cold
> DJS3 > showers when the mother was at work.
>
> On what do you base this statement, Dan?
On information from you, grag.
> I see also that you are attempting to blame me
> for the fact the CPS agency did a sex abuse
> exam on a 7 year old girl with no probable cause.
What you did to the little girl was probable cause, grag.
> While we're on the subject, Dan I should point
> out that you were once FOUNDED by your state
> CPS for sexual abuse,
Not true, grag.
> and I was never
> founded for anything sexual.
You have a copy of your case record?
Greegor
DJS3 > showers when the mother was at work.
G > On what do you base this statement, Dan?
DJS3 > On information from you, grag.
Quote and LINK please.
G > I see also that you are attempting to blame me
G > for the fact the CPS agency did a sex abuse
G > exam on a 7 year old girl with no probable cause.
DJS3 > What you did to the little girl was probable cause, grag.
CPS didn't even try that argument.
G > While we're on the subject, Dan I should point
G > out that you were once FOUNDED by your state
G > CPS for sexual abuse,
DJS3 > Not true, grag.
According to your own posts, Dan.
Noteably one of your posts about the
infamous puppet bear quote.
Do you want me to post it again?
G > and I was never
G > founded for anything sexual.
DJS3 > You have a copy of your case record?
Yes, I cross examined the caseworkers, remember?
Now if ONLY you actually had some qualifications,
it would actually be legal to xerox it and send it
to you.
But in YOUR CASE you would have at least
TWENTY caserecords, and at LEAST one
was for child sexual abuse..
KLS and your (other?) daughter never had
to undergo a sexual abuse gyno due to
whatever it was about you that drew
20+ child abuse reports, Dan ??
Was Susan with you when all of that went on?
Dan Sullivan
> DJS3 > grag forced the little girl into the cold
> DJS3 > showers when the mother was at work.
>
> G > On what do you base this statement, Dan?
>
> DJS3 > On information from you, grag.
>
> Quote and LINK please.
Go back and read your own posts, grag.
> G > I see also that you are attempting to blame me
> G > for the fact the CPS agency did a sex abuse
> G > exam on a 7 year old girl with no probable cause.
>
> DJS3 > What you did to the little girl was probable cause, grag.
>
> CPS didn't even try that argument.
Then what was the justification for the sex abuse exam?
> G > While we're on the subject, Dan I should point
> G > out that you were once FOUNDED by your state
> G > CPS for sexual abuse,
>
> DJS3 > Not true, grag.
>
> According to your own posts, Dan.
> Noteably one of your posts about the
> infamous puppet bear quote.
>
> Do you want me to post it again?
Go ahead.
It'll prove you're wrong.
> G > and I was never
> G > founded for anything sexual.
>
> DJS3 > You have a copy of your case record?
>
> Yes, I cross examined the caseworkers, remember?
That doesn't mean you have your case record.
Who did the direct examination, grag?
Who called the witness?
> Now if ONLY you actually had some qualifications,
> it would actually be legal to xerox it and send it
> to you.
I have enough toilet paper, grag.
> But in YOUR CASE you would have at least
> TWENTY caserecords, and at LEAST one
> was for child sexual abuse..
All unfounded.
Dan Sullivan
Greegor
> On Oct 29, 11:24 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > DJS3 > grag forced the little girl into the cold
> > DJS3 > showers when the mother was at work.
>
> > G > On what do you base this statement, Dan?
>
> > DJS3 > On information from you, grag.
>
> > Quote and LINK please.
>
> Go back and read your own posts, grag.
So you didn't base it on any particular statement, then?
> > G > I see also that you are attempting to blame me
> > G > for the fact the CPS agency did a sex abuse
> > G > exam on a 7 year old girl with no probable cause.
>
> > DJS3 > What you did to the little girl was probable cause, grag.
>
> > CPS didn't even try that argument.
>
> Then what was the justification for the sex abuse exam?
What makes you think they believe they NEED one?
They do it as a matter of ROUTINE!
> > G > While we're on the subject, Dan I should point
> > G > out that you were once FOUNDED by your state
> > G > CPS for sexual abuse,
>
> > DJS3 > Not true, grag.
>
> > According to your own posts, Dan.
> > Noteably one of your posts about the
> > infamous puppet bear quote.
>
> > Do you want me to post it again?
>
> Go ahead.
>
> It'll prove you're wrong.
If you delete it that will become fairly obvious.
> > G > and I was never
> > G > founded for anything sexual.
>
> > DJS3 > You have a copy of your case record?
>
> > Yes, I cross examined the caseworkers, remember?
>
> That doesn't mean you have your case record.
That's what I was supposed to be cross examining,
along with the people who formed it.
Maybe not. I was refused caseworkers original written notes.
In other states those are attached to the computerized versions.
Hell, Iowa DHS even refused to honor subpeonas
from a prosecutor going after a caseworker for perjury!
> Who did the direct examination, grag?
>
> Who called the witness?
I did.
> > Now if ONLY you actually had some qualifications,
> > it would actually be legal to xerox it and send it
> > to you.
>
> I have enough toilet paper, grag.
>
> > But in YOUR CASE you would have at least
> > TWENTY caserecords, and at LEAST one
> > was for child sexual abuse..
> All unfounded.
You claimed 5 of them were founded and later
due to your greatness changed to unfounded.
KLS and your (other?) daughter never had
to undergo a sexual abuse gyno due to
whatever it was about you that drew
20+ child abuse reports, Dan ??
Was Susan with you when all of that went on?
How many times did your daughter/s have to
have their crotch examined because you
seemed so suspicious you drew 20+
child abuse reports, Dan?
krp
> > Yeah pretty much Moe. I see Greg as pretty much the average
> > schlub. Not a great deal of guile
> I am not convinced that post is genuine.
DJS#3> Prove it isn't yours.
Danny how about YOU prove you weren't modeling puppet bear condoms for
little kids FIRST? After all YOU are the one here who WAS accused of sexual
abuse of children, NOT ME! And you even claimed you were "FOUNDED" in 5
cases. SO cut the shit here.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>
> Now you are LYING and claiming *IK* nwas there? You're an INSANE PERVERT
>Danny. You and your puppet bear condom demonstrations to little kids.
No wonder you have only ONE win, Pangborn. You think any claim
made by a CPS caseworker is 100% accurate 100% of the time.
It's kind of hard to work for the defense when you buy everything
the prosecution is selling.
"I am insane!"
--Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP Consulting and The A-team,
posting to alt.dads-rights.unmoderated claiming that he was found
legally insane.
Kent Wills
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Oct 29, 9:39�am, "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote:
>DJS3 > grag forced the little girl into the cold
>DJS3 > showers when the mother was at work.
>
>On what do you base this statement, Dan?
Probably your own posts.
You did BRAG about how you hung out in the bathroom while the
little girl was showering.
>
>I see also that you are attempting to blame me
>for the fact the CPS agency did a sex abuse
>exam on a 7 year old girl with no probable cause.
>
By your standards, you are guilty of the offense.
You believe every claim made by a CPS caseworker is 100% accurate
100% of the time. Reference your puppet bear comments for PROOF of
your standards.
>While we're on the subject, Dan I should point
>out that you were once FOUNDED by your state
>CPS for sexual abuse,
Post proof that Dan's been founded for sexual abuse.
>and I was never
>founded for anything sexual.
Prove it. Post scans of the reports you were given regarding your
case.
If you've been lying the whole time in a pathetic effort to
destroy the cases of those dealing with CPS, you'll offer nothing.
>
>You were investigated 20+ times and
>marked FOUNDED 5 times, so HOW MANY
>times did your little girl(s) have to undergo
>vaginal sex abuse exams, Dan?
>
>In point of fact, in our case there was no
>"probable cause" to put a 7 year old through
>that, and when we got Dr. Mengele on the
>witness stand and asked if there was any
>probable cause for the sex abuse exam
>she extolled that she believes that EVERY
>little girl in every CPS investigation should
>undergo her gyno exam!
>
If you weren't sexually attracted to pre-pubescent girls, as
PROVED by your many posts, maybe Lisa's girl wouldn't have needed to
be subjected to such an exam.
Even if she were not penetrated, you MUST admit you molested her.
Unless you are UNABLE to hold yourself to the same standards you
DEMAND be held to others.
>Why don't you tell us more about the VARIOUS
>sex abuse exams your daughter(s) underwent
>due to your 20+ investigations and 5 FOUNDEDS?
>
>Why was it that you attracted SO MANY child
>abuse reports, Dan? Is it something about
>how you look? Or something about your lifestyle?
>
>Do you feel responsibility or guilt about the
>sex abuse exams your daughter/s underwent?
>
>Tell us about the "credible evidence", Dan.
A copy of your report would go far in helping your credibility.
Prove that you were reported to DHS for child abuse (neglect is a
form of abuse under Iowa law). Prove that you were accused of
molestation. Prove your claims, unless you were (and are) lying.
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, or proving he's so
stupid he thinks I'm Asian.
MID:<c6bac3f6-7a0e-4bf8-8ddd-d77bccfc6...@p49g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/msg/395db830731df54a
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott Hanson, wife beater and child abuser: "Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Greg Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child abuser.
Message-ID: <35120b16.04011...@posting.google.com>
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
Path:
news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-protective-services
With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching
into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon,
videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I
was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with
water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out
a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she
gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you
were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?"
She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I
prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed
triumphantly.
--a true story
Kent Wills
wrote:
>ENGLISH PROFESSOR (pretend)
>"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>news:65e52a62-185c-4d4c...@t11g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
>
>> > Yeah pretty much Moe. I see Greg as pretty much the average
>> > schlub. Not a great deal of guile
>
>> I am not convinced that post is genuine.
>
>DJS#3> Prove it isn't yours.
>
> Danny how about YOU prove you weren't modeling puppet bear condoms for
>little kids FIRST? After all YOU are the one here who WAS accused of sexual
>abuse of children, NOT ME!
That was Gregory Scott Hanson. By his own standards, he's
guilty.
>And you even claimed you were "FOUNDED" in 5
>cases. SO cut the shit here.
You seem to have mistakenly forgot to mention all five were
reversed. Since you accept his claim that they were founded, you must
accept that they were reversed. The same source presents the claims.
Dan Sullivan
> ENGLISH PROFESSOR (pretend)"Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
"Cut the shit" means you did call grag a schlub and you don't want to
admit it, pangborn.
YOU are a lying putz, kenny boy.
Farschstein?
Greegor
schmuck, below average in some ways, etc.
Your EGO couldn't stand that, could it?
Dan Sullivan
Couldn't stand you being called a schlub and a schmuck, grag?
Sure I could.
Greegor
G > schmuck, below average in some ways, etc.
G >
G > Your EGO couldn't stand that, could it?
Daniel J. Sullivan III goes 'round the obsessive
bend repeating this crap over and over again.
A "literate person" (his phrase) would interpret
this to be a display of insecurity on Dan's part.
Apparently Dan's EGO and internet persona is his life.
ken pangborn calls his ONLY supporter on the news groups, grag hanson,
"an average schlub." With schlub meaning a person who is clumsy,
stupid or unattractive.
1 Dan Sullivan Oct 26
Re: Sullivan keeps on LYING
2 krp Oct 27
pangborn lies and lies and lies and lies....
3 Dan Sullivan Oct 27
Re: Dan Sullivan's delusions of adequacy
4 krp Oct 27
pangborn looks like a steaming pile of cow poo.
5 Dan Sullivan Oct 27
6 krp Oct 28
7 Dan Sullivan Oct 28
8 Dan Sullivan Oct 28
9 Dan Sullivan Oct 28
Re: Dan Sullivan's delusions of adequacy
10 Kent Wills Oct 28
11 krp Oct 28
12 Greegor Oct 28
13 Greegor Oct 28
14 Kent Wills Oct 29
Re: pangborn lies and lies and lies and lies....
15 Kent Wills Oct 28
Re: Sullivan keeps on LYING
16 freedom Oct 28
pangborn keeps on LYING
17 Dan Sullivan Oct 28
Re: Sullivan keeps on LYING
18 krp Oct 29
19 Kent Wills Oct 29
Re:pangborn keeps on LYING
20 Dan Sullivan Oct 29
Re: Sulivan's manifold delusions
21 krp Oct 29
Re: ken pangborn calls his ONLY supporter on the news groups,
grag hanson, "an average schlub." With schlub meaning a person who is
clumsy, stupid or unattractive.
22 Dan Sullivan Oct 29
Re: Sulivan's manifold delusions
23 Kent Wills Oct 30
Daniel J Sullivan III of Patchogue NY was once FOUNDED by Child
Protection for sexual abuse.
24 Greegor Oct 29
Re: ken pangborn calls his ONLY supporter on the news groups,
grag hanson, "an average schlub." With schlub meaning a person who is
clumsy, stupid or unattractive.
25 Dan Sullivan Oct 29
Is Dan obsessed with his little pischer?
26 Greegor Oct 29
Re: ken pangborn calls his ONLY supporter on the news groups,
grag hanson, "an average schlub." With schlub meaning a person who is
clumsy, stupid or unattractive.
27 Dan Sullivan Oct 29
28 Greegor Oct 30
Re: Is Dan obsessed with his little pischer?
29 Kent Wills Oct 30
Re: Daniel J Sullivan III of Patchogue NY was once FOUNDED by
Child Protection for sexual abuse.
30 Kent Wills Oct 30
Re: Sullivan keeps on LYING
31 Kent Wills Oct 29
Re: ken pangborn calls his ONLY supporter on the news groups, grag
hanson, "an average schlub." With schlub meaning a person who is
clumsy, stupid or unattractive.
32 Dan Sullivan Oct 28
Re: DAN SULLIVAN'S ENGLISH LESSONS
33 krp Oct 29
34 Kent Wills Oct 29
Re: ken pangborn calls his ONLY supporter on the news groups, grag
hanson, "an average schlub." With schlub meaning a person who is
clumsy, stupid or unattractive.
35 Dan Sullivan Oct 29
Daniel J Sullivan III of Patchogue NY and his schmekel
36 Greegor Oct 29
Re: ken pangborn calls his ONLY supporter on the news groups, grag
hanson, "an average schlub." With schlub meaning a person who is
clumsy, stupid or unattractive.
37 Dan Sullivan Oct 29
Daniel J Sullivan III of Patchogue NY and his schmekel
38 Greegor Oct 29
Re: ken pangborn calls his ONLY supporter on the news groups, grag
hanson, "an average schlub." With schlub meaning a person who is
clumsy, stupid or unattractive.
39 Dan Sullivan Oct 29
40 krp Oct 29
41 Dan Sullivan Oct 29
42 krp Oct 29
43 Dan Sullivan Oct 29
44 Dan Sullivan Oct 29
Re: Dan Sullivan's private MANYFOLD English definitions
45 krp Oct 30
46 Kent Wills Oct 30
Re: ken pangborn calls his ONLY supporter on the news groups,
grag hanson, "an average schlub." With schlub meaning a person who is
clumsy, stupid or unattractive.
47 Dan Sullivan Oct 30
Dan's EGO couldn't stand it.
48 Greegor Oct 31
Re: ken pangborn calls his ONLY supporter on the news groups,
grag hanson, "an average schlub." With schlub meaning a person who is
clumsy, stupid or unattractive.
49 Dan Sullivan Oct 31
Dan Sullivan
> G > Dan, My ego can stand being called a schlub,
> G > schmuck, below average in some ways, etc.
> G >
> G > Your EGO couldn't stand that, could it?
>
> Daniel J. Sullivan III goes 'round the obsessive
> bend repeating this crap over and over again.
pangborn lied about calling you a schlub, grag.
he said he didn't but I proved he did.
Then he claimed his message wasn't genuine!!!
> A "literate person" (his phrase) would interpret
> this to be a display of insecurity on Dan's part.
That's pangborn's phrase.
> Apparently Dan's EGO and internet persona is his life.
Mine and the people who ask me for help.
Kent Wills
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>G > Dan, My ego can stand being called a schlub,
>G > schmuck, below average in some ways, etc.
>G >
>G > Your EGO couldn't stand that, could it?
>
>Daniel J. Sullivan III goes 'round the obsessive
>bend repeating this crap over and over again.
>
>A "literate person" (his phrase) would interpret
>this to be a display of insecurity on Dan's part.
So when you post information that you claim is about me over and
over again, even after you admitted said information isn't about me
but some other Kent Wills, every literate person reading should
interpret that as a display of insecurity on your part.
Got it.
>
>Apparently Dan's EGO and internet persona is his life.
Are you telling the readers a little something about yourself?
If Dan's posts are, in your view, stand as evidence of his ego
and persona, what does applying those same standards to you tell the
readers about you?
Do be specific in your reply, unless I've so totaly exposed you
for the mentally ill, drug addicted fool you are that you must RUN
from the questions.
--a true story
>
Greegor
G > schmuck, below average in some ways, etc.
G >
G > Your EGO couldn't stand that, could it?
G > Daniel J. Sullivan III goes 'round the obsessive
G > bend repeating this crap over and over again.
DJS3 > pangborn lied about calling you a schlub, grag.
Obsess much?
You thought that my EGO was as fragile as
your weather balloon of an ego, right?
DJS3 > he said he didn't but I proved he did.
DJS3 > Then he claimed his message wasn't genuine!!!
You thought I was going to cuss out Ken for that?
Just because you are an EGO case (compensating?)
you think that I am as well?
Puff up that weather balloon of an EGO you've got, Dan!
It always ends well.
G > A "literate person" (his phrase) would interpret
G > this to be a display of insecurity on Dan's part.
DJS3 > That's pangborn's phrase.
So what? Obsess much?
G > Apparently Dan's EGO and internet persona is his life.
DJS3 > Mine and the people who ask me for help.
Why would your EGO be important to them?
If they really exist.
Would those people like your argument
that a falsely accused parent is to BLAME
for the investigation?
Or that you were accused of child sexual abuse
and FOUNDED for it yet you pretend your daughter/s never
had to undergo any gyno exam for sexual abuse?
lostintranslation
This is all getting old and boring, guys. I mean really. Go get a
facebook account and beef it out in Mafia Wars or something.
krp
"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:05678536-33d0-49a2...@g27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>G > Dan, My ego can stand being called a schlub,
> G > schmuck, below average in some ways, etc.
> G >
> G > Your EGO couldn't stand that, could it?
>
> G > Daniel J. Sullivan III goes 'round the obsessive
> G > bend repeating this crap over and over again.
>
> DJS3 > pangborn lied about calling you a schlub, grag.
>
> Obsess much?
>
> You thought that my EGO was as fragile as
> your weather balloon of an ego, right?
He is so much the deranged POLACK he thinks that PROFESSOR Sullivan's
definitions are BINDING on the rest of the world, Gregg. It's his experience
in coming from a fascist state.
krp
Remember Danny, I am no longer on Verizon so I *CAN now read your back
stabbing bullshit on ASCPS. POOR BABY!!!
> G > Dan, My ego can stand being called a schlub,
> G > schmuck, below average in some ways, etc.
> G >
> G > Your EGO couldn't stand that, could it?
>
> Daniel J. Sullivan III goes 'round the obsessive
> bend repeating this crap over and over again.
DJS#3> pangborn lied about calling you a schlub, grag. he said he didn't but
I proved he did. Then he claimed his message wasn't genuine!!!
Schlub isn't a term I normally use, since you posted it without the
GOOGLE link, your claim, given your track record is doubtful, AT BEST.
Dan Sullivan
"krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:4aecbb76$0$4954$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com...
Your message calling grag a schlub is in the same thread with the message in
which you call grag a schmuck and you made numerous posts after the schlub
message.
How do you explain that you didn't complain that someone was using your
name, if it wasn't you, pangborn?
Kent Wills
wrote:
I wasn't aware New York was/is a fascist state.
I think you're mistaken as to the politics of the state of New
York.
"you are reading Moore's SELECTIVE material that is HIGHLY edited."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn claiming in misc.legal that David Moore can
and does edit Google's Usenet archive.
Message-ID: <n9Sfm.1372$nh2...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>
Kent Wills
wrote:
>POOR CONFUSED DANNY SULLIVAN
>"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>news:643bdec8-fbdb-47d0...@r31g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
>
> Remember Danny, I am no longer on Verizon so I *CAN now read your back
>stabbing bullshit on ASCPS. POOR BABY!!!
>
>
>> G > Dan, My ego can stand being called a schlub,
>> G > schmuck, below average in some ways, etc.
>> G >
>> G > Your EGO couldn't stand that, could it?
>>
>> Daniel J. Sullivan III goes 'round the obsessive
>> bend repeating this crap over and over again.
>
>DJS#3> pangborn lied about calling you a schlub, grag. he said he didn't but
>I proved he did. Then he claimed his message wasn't genuine!!!
>
> Schlub isn't a term I normally use,
Which explains why you didn't understand its meaning.
>since you posted it without the
>GOOGLE link, your claim, given your track record is doubtful, AT BEST.
You NEVER offer Google links, yet demand you've proved your
mistaken claims.
"(CONTEXT REMOVED AS TO THE BELOW CLAIM)"
Kenneth Robert Pangborn admitting he alters the context of posts
when he replies.
MID FyUom.1363$Jd7....@nwrddc02.gnilink.net
Dan Sullivan
> G > schmuck, below average in some ways, etc.
> G >
> G > Your EGO couldn't stand that, could it?
>
> G > Daniel J. Sullivan III goes 'round the obsessive
> G > bend repeating this crap over and over again.
>
> DJS3 > pangborn lied about calling you a schlub, grag.
>
> Obsess much?
>
> You thought that my EGO was as fragile as
> your weather balloon of an ego, right?
You think I have a fragile ego, grag?
> DJS3 > he said he didn't but I proved he did.
> DJS3 > Then he claimed his message wasn't genuine!!!
>
> You thought I was going to cuss out Ken for that?
> Just because you are an EGO case (compensating?)
> you think that I am as well?
>
> Puff up that weather balloon of an EGO you've got, Dan!
>
> It always ends well.
>
> G > A "literate person" (his phrase) would interpret
> G > this to be a display of insecurity on Dan's part.
>
> DJS3 > That's pangborn's phrase.
>
> So what?
So you don't know what you're talking about, like that's a surprise.
> Obsess much?
>
> G > Apparently Dan's EGO and internet persona is his life.
>
> DJS3 > Mine and the people who ask me for help.
>
> Why would your EGO be important to them?
My ego is an important part of who I am.
> If they really exist.
You exist and you asked me for help.
> Would those people like your argument
> that a falsely accused parent is to BLAME
> for the investigation?
I never said that.
Greegor
DJS3 > Mine and the people who ask me for help.
G > Why would your EGO be important to them?
DJS3 > My ego is an important part of who I am.
That much is apparent.
krp
> G > Dan, My ego can stand being called a schlub,
> G > schmuck, below average in some ways, etc.
> G >
> G > Your EGO couldn't stand that, could it?
>
> G > Daniel J. Sullivan III goes 'round the obsessive
> G > bend repeating this crap over and over again.
>
> DJS3 > pangborn lied about calling you a schlub, grag.
>
> Obsess much?
>
> You thought that my EGO was as fragile as
> your weather balloon of an ego, right?
DJS#3> You think I have a fragile ego, grag?
Nope just an extremely BLOATED one, Danny! Kit is impossible to find a
subject area you have NOT claimed to be the world's leading expert.
krp
bulk, ye pined:
> Tinseled woman of the night with macabre meat muffin, gangling pantry
> shelves, and gargantuan drain-pipe is looking for sordid cunt
> companion for boisterous naval engagements.
>
> Email me at mailto:kr...@tampabay.rr.com. Privacy and discretion
> assured.
Kent Wills
Psychology 101. The Ego, Super Ego and Id are all an important
part of each person.
An erudite person would have already known that.
krp
Path:
unlimited.newshosting.com!dartmaster!209.197.12.242.MISMATCH!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.21.MISMATCH!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!news.alt.net
From: krp <kr...@t4nnp464y.rr.cunt>
Newsgroups:
alt.support.child-protective-services,soc.men,alt.dads-rights.unmoderated,misc.legal,alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: Blond Babe krp Riding Dick While Kinky Peeing
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:50:26 -1200
Organization: Snot-Nosed Fowl Regulation Approval Trust
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <h79bud$3fk$b...@alt.flame.spurt.your.curd.co.kiribati>
References:
<a16759c1-1d91-4c59...@o21g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>
<4ae9e9ae$0$5641$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>
<65e52a62-185c-4d4c...@t11g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
<4aeaa4cd$0$4962$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>
<eb01cf64-106c-4108...@v36g2000yqv.googlegroups.com>
<bfe62f00-a7b1-43ec...@p35g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
<84cd66d1-12fd-4a18...@w19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
<dotoe5tpm22g34lan...@4ax.com>
<05678536-33d0-49a2...@g27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
<315286bb-9ca9-4579...@l34g2000vba.googlegroups.com>
<4aed2bf3$0$4986$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com>
X-Complain-To: usenet.c...@gmail.com
X-Yes-Archive: No
X-Killfile: Kadaitcha Man
Xref: unlimited.newshosting.com alt.support.child-protective-services:166967
soc.men:1070656 alt.dads-rights.unmoderated:122944 misc.legal:440116
alt.usenet.kooks:1480660
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 091031-0, 10/31/2009), Inbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
krp, ye wanton envious emulator, thou is spread of late into a goodly
bulk, ye pined:
> Tinseled woman of the night with macabre meat muffin, gangling pantry
> shelves, and gargantuan drain-pipe is looking for sordid cunt
> companion for boisterous naval engagements.
Moore perhaps thery should visit YOUR house? Eh?
Dan Sullivan
> COWARDLY"Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>
> news:315286bb-9ca9-4579...@l34g2000vba.googlegroups.com...
>
> > G > Dan, My ego can stand being called a schlub,
> > G > schmuck, below average in some ways, etc.
> > G >
> > G > Your EGO couldn't stand that, could it?
>
> > G > Daniel J. Sullivan III goes 'round the obsessive
> > G > bend repeating this crap over and over again.
>
> > DJS3 > pangborn lied about calling you a schlub, grag.
>
> > Obsess much?
>
> > You thought that my EGO was as fragile as
> > your weather balloon of an ego, right?
>
> DJS#3> You think I have a fragile ego, grag?
>
> Nope just an extremely BLOATED one, Danny!
I ask grag a question and you answer, pangborn?
When grag takes a dump do you wipe your ass?
> Kit is impossible to find a
> subject area you have NOT claimed to be the world's leading expert.
Post the proof that I have claimed to be the "world's leading expert"
in three subjects.
Kadaitcha Man
citizen, ye cowered:
> DAVID MOORE AND HIS BATHROOM HUMOR
> X-Killfile: Kadaitcha Man
> Moore
<SNORT>
<GUFFAW>
--
Ubuntu 9.10 x64 running Windows Server 2008 in VirtualBox
16GB 1333MHz DDR3 RAM, 10 * SATA2 3GB/s HDDs as dual 3TB RAID5
8-thread Intel Extreme i7-975 @ 3.80GHz, air-cooled Thermaltake
Intel BoneTrail Motherboard
Dual nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS 1GB
Honda Sabre 1100cc V-Twin
I can wank better than you can.
PS: Jensen Interceptor in air-conditioned storage.
Kent Wills
wrote:
Lay off the booze, Pangborn. That wasn't David.
A simple trace would have proved that for you.
womanGoddess
> On Oct 29, 3:16 pm, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>
>
> > > On Oct 28, 8:28 am, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>
> > >> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> > >> On Oct 27, 1:34 pm, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> > >> > ATTORNEY AT LAW (in his dreams)"Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net>
> > >> > wrote in message
> > >> >news:3a46b452-8716-4faf...@q14g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
> > >> > > > With friends like ken pangborn...
> > >> > > Danny claims I called Greg a "SCHLUB." HE LIES.
> > >> > DS - No, pangborn YOU LIE.
> > >> > DS - You absolutely DID call grag a "schlub."
> > >> DJS#3> Your lack of denial is noted, pangborn.
> > >> Muist I deny every bity of your INSANE BULLSHIT? Just denying every
> > >> aspect of your lies in ONE of your posts would take me a week. I did not
> > >> call Greg a "schlub"
>
> > > Liar.
>
> > > ===========
>
> > > Newsgroups: alt.support.child-protective-services
> > > From: "krp" <kr...@verizon.net>
> > > Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 11:00:49 GMT
> > > Local: Sat, Apr 4 2009 7:00 am
> > > Subject: Re: Greg wants " below average" link, Well HERE IT IS!!! IT'S
> > > MAUREEN MCCALISTER!
>
> > > <<<snip>>>
>
> > > MOE THE SLOW> You said it Kennie. You went on a rant on me and LET
> > > SLIP
> > > WHAT YOU
> > > MOE THE SLOW> REALLY THINK OF GREG!!!
>
> > > Yeah pretty much Moe. I see Greg as pretty much the average
> > > schlub. Not
> > > a great deal of guile
>
>
> > >> I called him an average "schmuck" (meaning to the
> > >> LITERATE FOLKS an average guy.)
>
> > > To literate folks you called grag an average penis (schmuck).
>
> > > And schlub means clumsy stupid or unattractive person.
>
> > I'm not
> > convinced the post is genuine, it isn't a word I regularly use.
>
> Obviously because you don't know what it means.
>
> You admitted using the word "schmuck" and you don't know what it means
> either.
Now they are pretending they know Yiddish.
Maybe Kennie doesn't find Greg's penis attractive enough for him.
Greg is OC not an attractive male.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
lostintranslation
> On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 08:43:07 -0500, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >DAVID MOORE AND HIS BATHROOM HUMOR
>
> >Path:
> >unlimited.newshosting.com!dartmaster!209.197.12.242.MISMATCH!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!69.16.185.21.MISMATCH!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!news.alt.net
> >From: krp <kr...@t4nnp464y.rr.cunt>
> >Newsgroups:
> >alt.support.child-protective-services,soc.men,alt.dads-rights.unmoderated,misc.legal,alt.usenet.kooks
> >Subject: Blond Babe krp Riding Dick While Kinky Peeing
> >Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:50:26 -1200
> >Organization: Snot-Nosed Fowl Regulation Approval Trust
> >Lines: 9
> >References:
> ><a16759c1-1d91-4c59-80f4-08924b921...@o21g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>
> ><4ae9e9ae$0$5641$9a6e1...@unlimited.newshosting.com>
> ><65e52a62-185c-4d4c-ad9e-6d58a8adf...@t11g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
> ><4aeaa4cd$0$4962$9a6e1...@unlimited.newshosting.com>
> ><eb01cf64-106c-4108-b49f-67572e83d...@v36g2000yqv.googlegroups.com>
> ><bfe62f00-a7b1-43ec-897e-9bfc72c4c...@p35g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
> ><84cd66d1-12fd-4a18-ab8c-b05c0fc4f...@w19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
> ><dotoe5tpm22g34lankmvk70hudpqfnm...@4ax.com>
> ><05678536-33d0-49a2-aa35-1ef0d71f4...@g27g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>
> ><315286bb-9ca9-4579-920a-6d5ebde11...@l34g2000vba.googlegroups.com>
> ><4aed2bf3$0$4986$9a6e1...@unlimited.newshosting.com>
> >X-Complain-To: usenet.complai...@gmail.com
> >X-Yes-Archive: No
> >X-Killfile: Kadaitcha Man
> >Xref: unlimited.newshosting.com alt.support.child-protective-services:166967
> >soc.men:1070656 alt.dads-rights.unmoderated:122944 misc.legal:440116
> >alt.usenet.kooks:1480660
> >X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 091031-0, 10/31/2009), Inbound message
> >X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
>
> >krp, ye wanton envious emulator, thou is spread of late into a goodly
> >bulk, ye pined:
>
> >> Tinseled woman of the night with macabre meat muffin, gangling pantry
> >> shelves, and gargantuan drain-pipe is looking for sordid cunt
> >> companion for boisterous naval engagements.
>
> > Moore perhaps thery should visit YOUR house? Eh?
>
> Lay off the booze, Pangborn. That wasn't David.
> A simple trace would have proved that for you.
>
> "you are reading Moore's SELECTIVE material that is HIGHLY edited."
> Kenneth Robert Pangborn claiming in misc.legal that David Moore can
> and does edit Google's Usenet archive.
Boys, boys, boys! I'm telling you, just go beef it out in Mafia Wars
or Ghetto Wars or something. Make all this a bit more interesting
rather than this same old, prove this, prove that, I'm not me, you're
not you bullshit.
Kent Wills
<fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...]
>> > I'm not
>> > convinced the post is genuine, it isn't a word I regularly use.
>>
>> Obviously because you don't know what it means.
>>
>> You admitted using the word "schmuck" and you don't know what it means
>> either.
>
>Now they are pretending they know Yiddish.
Actually, Kenny-Bob did admit he doesn't know it.
Since he's a bigot, he wouldn't want to learn anything about a
language associated mostly with Jewish people.
>
> Maybe Kennie doesn't find Greg's penis attractive enough for him.
I'm a bit concerned that Ken would have had an opportunity to
judge.
>Greg is OC not an attractive male.
I only hope he's learned of the joy of shampoo. The picture of
him and Dennis (and by Greg's own standards, the picture is of him),
shows two males for whom bathing is NEVER an option.
Kent Wills
<lostintran...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
>> > =A0 =A0Moore perhaps thery should visit YOUR house? Eh?
>>
>> =A0 =A0 Lay off the booze, Pangborn. =A0That wasn't David.
>> =A0 =A0 A simple trace would have proved that for you.
>>
>> "you are reading Moore's SELECTIVE material that is HIGHLY edited."
>> =A0 =A0Kenneth Robert Pangborn claiming in misc.legal that David Moore ca=
>n
>> and does edit Google's Usenet archive.
>> Message-ID: <n9Sfm.1372$nh2....@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>
>
>Boys, boys, boys! I'm telling you, just go beef it out in Mafia Wars
>or Ghetto Wars or something.
I'm not familiar with those games.
Is either available for X-Box 360?
>Make all this a bit more interesting
>rather than this same old, prove this, prove that, I'm not me, you're
>not you bullshit.
At what point has either of us claimed to be someone else?
Maybe your referencing when someone was posting with nyms from
the movie "Hackers"?
I don't know that Pangborn knew it wasn't me the whole time. Greg
let it slip that he did. Of course, the fake quote wasn't to be from
Greg, so if that is what you are referencing, it's kind of pointless.
--
"Kent"
lostintranslation
> On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 16:51:19 -0800 (PST), lostintranslation
>
Not XBox360; Facebook or myspace apps. I play on facebook
Kent Wills
<lostintran...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
>>
>> >Boys, boys, boys! �I'm telling you, just go beef it out in Mafia Wars
>> >or Ghetto Wars or something. �
>>
>> � � �I'm not familiar with those games.
>> � � �Is either available for X-Box 360?
>>
>> >Make all this a bit more interesting
>> >rather than this same old, prove this, prove that, I'm not me, you're
>> >not you bullshit.
>>
>> � � �At what point has either of us claimed to be someone else?
>> � � �Maybe your referencing when someone was posting with nyms from
>> the movie "Hackers"?
>> � � �I don't know that Pangborn knew it wasn't me the whole time. Greg
>> let it slip that he did. �Of course, the fake quote wasn't to be from
>> Greg, so if that is what you are referencing, it's kind of pointless.
>>
>> --
>> "Kent"
>
>Not XBox360; Facebook or myspace apps. I play on facebook
Ah...
I don't play them. If someone sends me a message asking me to
play and app, they lose friendship status as quickly as I can remove
them.
--
"Kent"
krp
"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:gslre5h9ragsa07at...@4ax.com...
Trace a REMAILER???? You're getting the Polack juice in IV form now, aren't
ya Kunt?
AMAZING!!
lostintranslation
> On Sun, 1 Nov 2009 18:18:09 -0800 (PST), lostintranslation
>
It's the only app I play. The others seem a bit....childish.
Greegor
KBW > Ah... I don't play them. If someone
KBW > sends me a message asking me to
KBW > play and app, they lose friendship
KBW > status as quickly as I can remove them.
LIT > It's the only app I play. The others seem
LIT > a bit....childish.
What is this, a cat fight?
KBW > Lay off the booze, Pangborn. That wasn't David.
KBW > A simple trace would have proved that for you.
KRP > Trace a REMAILER???? You're getting the
KRP > Polack juice in IV form now, aren't ya Kunt?
KRP > AMAZING!!
Kent has special skills.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>POLACK LOGIC
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com/race.html
You're a bigot. This is accepted. It's nice that you feel
compelled to add more proof, but it's no longer necessary. No one has
even tried to deny this proved truth.
It's not a remailer, you drunken fool.
The poster used news.alt.net, as shown in the headers. The
server is a part of Altopia, a fairly well known NNTP server.
If you aren't too drunk to do it, trace the post. I know the IP
isn't listed, but that only means it's a tad bit harder to do.
I'm sure someone with your knowledge and skill, and vast network
of private contacts should have the location within 10 minutes, if you
take your time. Oh wait, you lack any knowledge or skill, and you
don't have any contacts, private or public.
Well, I guess you'll just have to issue false claims. You have
nothing else to offer.
>You're getting the Polack juice in IV form now, aren't
>ya Kunt?
That you hate me because I dared to come to the U.S. (every
racist HATES foreigners as well, as you consistently PROVE), doesn't
alter the truth.
>AMAZING!!
That you're so drunk you don't know the difference between a
remailer and Usenet server isn't amazing. It's very sad, but not
amazing.
Now, be a good little monkey and prove, again, that you're a
bigot. Go on. You know your intense HATE for minorities and
immigrants DEMANDS it of you. And I've granted you permission. It's
win/win for you.
"Quotes below have been highly altered."
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn accidentally admitting in misc.legal
that he alters posts when he replies.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>[ LIT brought up facebook app mafia wars ]
>
>KBW > Ah... I don't play them. �If someone
>KBW > sends me a message asking me to
>KBW > play and app, they lose friendship
>KBW > status as quickly as I can remove them.
>
>LIT > It's the only app I play. �The others seem
>LIT > a bit....childish.
>
>What is this, a cat fight?
No.
You do seem to see fights where none exist.
I don't play any of the apps. LIT plays one. How, outside of
your drug induced delusions, do you rationalize a fight occurring?
Be specific, please.
>
>
>KBW > Lay off the booze, Pangborn. That wasn't David.
>KBW > A simple trace would have proved that for you.
>
>KRP > Trace a REMAILER???? You're getting the
>KRP > Polack juice in IV form now, aren't ya Kunt?
>KRP > AMAZING!!
>
>Kent has special skills.
Not really. I just know how to read headers.
The post was not sent from a remailer, but from one of Altopia's
servers. An erudite person would have seen this right away.
BTW, why are you commenting about something that wasn't in the
post to which you are replying? You frequently do this sort of thing,
adding to and subtracting from posts.
I know it's because you want to alter the context of the post.
What I would really like to know is why you are motivated to do such a
thing? Please explain.
Thank you in advance.
Greegor
KBW > Ah... I don't play them. If someone
KBW > sends me a message asking me to
KBW > play and app, they lose friendship
KBW > status as quickly as I can remove them.
LIT > It's the only app I play. The others seem
LIT > a bit....childish.
G > What is this, a cat fight?
KBW > Lay off the booze, Pangborn. That wasn't David.
KBW > A simple trace would have proved that for you.
KRP > Trace a REMAILER???? You're getting the
KRP > Polack juice in IV form now, aren't ya Kunt?
KRP > AMAZING!!
G > Kent has special skills.
You can trace every one of Dave's ""Anonymous"" posts, right Kent?
Kent Wills
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>[ LIT brought up facebook app mafia wars ]
>
>KBW > Ah... �I don't play them. �If someone
>KBW > sends me a message asking me to
>KBW > play and app, they lose friendship
>KBW > status as quickly as I can remove them.
>
>LIT > It's the only app I play. �The others seem
>LIT > a bit....childish.
>
>G > What is this, a cat fight?
>
>KBW > Lay off the booze, Pangborn. �That wasn't David.
>KBW > A simple trace would have proved that for you.
Why are you C&P two different threads together as if they were
one?
>
>KRP > Trace a REMAILER???? �You're getting the
>KRP > Polack juice in IV form now, aren't ya Kunt?
>KRP > AMAZING!!
>
>G > Kent has special skills.
>
>You can trace every one of Dave's ""Anonymous"" posts, right Kent?
We've had this discussion before, Greg. I can only trace it to
the anonymizer.
Whereas I already PROVED Ken the drunken fool he was (and is) by
pointing out the post in question wasn't done with a remailer, I have
to wonder why you're acting as if I hadn't.
What, specifically, about your admitted use and abuse of illegal
drugs has forced this? Please be specific.
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by attacking my
first wife (deceased).
MID:<c6bac3f6-7a0e-4bf8-8ddd-d77bccfc6...@p49g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott Hanson, wife beater and child abuser: "Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Gregory Scott Hanson, wife beater and child abuser