Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Coulter: When did we vote to become Mexico?

2 views
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted

•RLMeasures

unread,
May 25, 2013, 9:06:41 AM5/25/13
to
In article
<hal.i.burton-F5F2...@unknown-98-136-209-x.yahoo.com>,
Harold Burton <hal.i....@hotmail.com> wrote:

> In article <r-2405131...@10.0.1.3>, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures)
> wrote:
>
> > In article
> >
<hal.i.burton-6647...@atoulouse-552-1-42-74.w92-136.abo.wanadoo.
> > fr>,
> > Harold Burton <hal.i....@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <r-2305131...@10.0.1.3>, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures)
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > In article
> > > > <hal.i.burton-8C71...@74.sub-97-136-209.myvzw.com>, Harold
> > > > Burton <hal.i....@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > In article <r-2305131...@10.0.1.3>, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures)
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > In article <XnsA1C9A35B9FAC0...@216.196.121.131>,
> > > > > > Mitchell
> > > > > > Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Tracey12 <tracey...@gmail.com> wrote in
> > > > > > > news:197e0ad5-cfa0-4b2a-a994-
> > > > > > > cee485...@20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On May 22, 7:09 pm, Mitchell Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Put those conditions
> > > > > > > >> together and you will find illegal immigrants.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Is anyone surprised that the 3rd world south of the US
border is
> > > > > > > > going
> > > > > > > > to try to invade our country?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Actually the US invaded their country.
> > > ^^^^^
> > >
> > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Read some history.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > • Neo-cons are immune to disturbing history.
> > > > >
> > > > > As are leftards.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Again, exactly how did it become "their" country?
> > > > >
> > > > • who, which?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > See the underlining 6 lines up?
> >
> > • I see no underlining. It might be easier to answer the question.
>
>
> Not if you can't see the underlining. Any answer I made would be beyond
> your comprehension.
>
>
> snicker

• nada
0 new messages