How's Mike's mom doing?
Alex Cain
reported to Earthlink abuse.
peeceersb...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 10:00 PM, Alex Cain <mailto:alex...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >peeceersb...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 12:03 AM, Dave <mailto:d...@d.com> wrote:
> >> >In article <B7A40A2...@10.0.1.4>, <
> >> >peeceersb...@hotmail.com>
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 9:54 AM, xganon <mailto:nob...@xganon.com>
> >wrote:
> >> >> >How is Mike Jittlov's mother doing? I read where he posted back
> >> >> >in May that she was not doing well, does anybody have an update
> >> >> >on her condition or anywhere to send get well cards and/or flowers
> >> >> >and money?
> >> >>
> >> >> I don't think Mike accepts charity. Also, you might want to think
> twice
> >> >> about sending a cheesy "Hallmark" card to one of the most gifted and
> >> >> creative individuals in Hollywood who also lists one of the reasons
> for
> >> >> developing his incredibly small writing as "...it saves trees...",
> even
> >> if
> >> >> it is for Marie. I think Mike will let us know what needs to be known
> if
> >> >> and when he's ever ready.
> >> >>
> >> >> However, Mike freely lists his address and phone number in any one of
> >> his
> >> >> hudreds of Usenet posts in his sig.
> >> >>
> >> >> dave
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >You know, I read this reply a few days ago, and I've been getting more
> >> >and more pissed off thinking about it ever since.
> >>
> >> Sounds like you might benefit from anger- management counseling, there,
> >> pal.
> >
> >Attacking him right off the bat. Being a bit defensive aren't you?
> >
>
> Not exactly, asswipe.
How is it 'not exactly?'
>You conveniently left out parts of the previous
> imbecile's ranting and misguided, immature rages.
I left nothing out. I responded to what was there.
>
> >>
> >> It's almost
> >> >unimagineably nasty and snobby, seething with venom in response to
> >> >someone posting a totally kind-hearted query. Sorry you're so angry and
> >> >rotton, dude...
> >>
> >> The only "venom" around here seems to be yours.
> >
> >And yours.
>
> And now yours, little man ;)
Nope.
>
>
> >> I'd imagine there's nothing I could say to make you
> >> >realize how beyond shitty your response was. So I'll speak to "xganon",
> >> >who posted in the first place.
> >>
> >> You're right on that point; there isn't anything you can say to make me
> >> realize "how beyond shitty" my reply was because you are a hypocritical,
> >> angry individual. Read on if you have the courage...
> >
> >You're the one who is angry.
> >
>
> D'oh. Can't put one over on you, huh, "Ace"? :)
Nope!
>
> >> >Mike's address is Mike Jittlove, Church of the Creative Spirit, 902
> >> >North Maltman Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90026-2714 . Send him the
> >> >biggest, corniest Hallmark card you can find. And sign it with a
> >> >heartfelt line or two.
> >>
> >> And that isn't being "nasty and snobby"?
> >
> >No, it isn't. It's being human.
>
> And you and your dim- witted counterpart are prime examples of how the gene
> pool has been watered down in our species.
Wow. That's a lovely (f)lame.
>
> >> Mike has stated he does not
> >> accept charity.
> >
> >So what? He could give the money to those who need it, like the Red
> >Cross or the poor.
> >
>
> "So what"? You're an asshole.
No, that would be yourself. See, I don't feel the need to be an
inconsiderate, lame-assed coward pussy like yourself.
> The "so what" is that Mike has expressed he
> doesn't accept charity.
So he can give it to those who need it then. *shrug* Besides, I'm
sure he could use it for medical bills if he so desired.
>What part of that is lost on your feeble ganglion?
None of it, oh stupid one.
>
> >
> >> Mike has stated he is interested in "sav(ing) trees. Mike
> >> also does not shake hands. I suppose that if "xganon" wanted to, you
> would
> >> advocate that he also approach Mike on the street and give him an iron-
> >> gripped, arm- pumping, teeth- chattering handshake, as well?
> >
> >Those who would not know him might do so.
> >
>
> Right, oh flacid little interjector. That's what makes asshole number one's
> reply so patently rude and immature.
No, it doesn't.
> The original guy was asking if it was
> right to do these things- you two pea- brains- in- a- pod are the precise
> reason Mike suffers unnecessarilly.
"Suffers unnecessarily?" Oh so you're speaking for him now? Does he
know? He's posted here as himself, after all. I'm sure he doesn't need
an immature dickhead like yourself speaking for him in these matters.
> Why should Mike be forced to pass on
> your charity money or go through the hassle of dedaling with your idiotic
> greeting cards, you pompous, vapid, arrogant shit- for- brains?
Well it's obvious from your tone that if he does have to "be forced" to
deal with money or cards of concern, yours won't be among them.
> He's taking
> care of his sick mother you flaming asshole.
Yes, I know, motherfucker, and as a result, money or cards of support
would definitely help.
>
> >> And be very confident that you'll touch both
> >> >Mike and his mom, who, like everyone else in this world, are probably
> >> >lonely a lot of the time and need to know people care. And don't ever,
> >> >ever stop giving a damn, no matter what the grinches say.
> >>
> >> Mike is constantly inundated with harrassing, immature, stalking, angry,
> >> selfish and inconsiderate individuals such as yourself.
> >
> >You have first-hand knowledge, I take it?
>
> Uh...yeah. Mike happens to be a neighbor and friend.
Boy with neighbors like you, no wonder he's suffering so much.
Are you the one who keeps stealing his newspaper?
>
> >
> >>Furthermore, he is
> >> hardly lonely and "Send(ing) him the
> >> biggest, corniest Hallmark card you can find" only serves to make
> >Hallmark
> >> wealthier, destroy natural resources
> >
> >News flash moron: The tree that made the card that's at Hallmark as I
> >type this IS ALREADY DEAD. The person purchasing the card won't be
> >"destroying natural resources." Also most politically correct companies
> >these days use synthetic fibers for such things as cards and paper so
> >that more of the environment can be preserved.
>
> Wow...(shaking head in disbelief) you're a bigger asswipe than the last
> guy.
Thanks!! :)
> You don't understand the basic tenet of conservation, do you,
> dickhead?
Well when dealing with someone as thick-headed as yourself, the "basic
tenet of conversation" really never comes into play.
> It's "ALREADY DEAD" because simple jackasses such as yourself
> lack the intellect to grasp the basic tenets of supply and demand: the less
> people buying "big cheesy cards", the less "ALREADY DEAD TREES", you twit.
And if less people ate food and starved to death, there'd be more for
the rest of us, right?
Geezus fuck you are so stupid.
>
> >> and give Mike more hassle of dealing
> >> with said "big cheesy card" for recycling
> >
> >But, if it's recycling, it's not difficult to drop the card
> >into a box or bin for that purpose. You are indeed an idiot.
>
> You, just like your simple compatriot, lack the brain power to comprehend,
> I see.
Aww...thanks!
> It might "not difficult" for YOU to drop something into a recycling
> bin, but are you the primary caregiver for an aged stroke victim?
Are YOU? Absolutely not.
> I might
> be an idiot,
There's no "might" about it.
> but at least I have enough consideration to respect the man's
> privacy and expressed wishes.
So does everyone else, but as he's a public figure, and has posted his
address publically, he has invited the cards, letters, and money that
comes his way. If he does not like that happening, he can post a
request ON HIS OWN for people not to do so.
>
> >
> >> thus taking more time away from
> >> caring from his mother.
> >
> >Oh yea like it'll take an eternity to recycle a single card. *roll*
>
> You are a pompous, insignificant speck (see previous replies)
And you're a shit-for-brains fuckhead. :)
> Did you
> torture cats or other animals when you were a lad, by any chance?
Only squirrels. And the occassional mice.
>
> >> You should think twice before flaming me or anyone else, you pompous
> >> jackass.
> >
> >Why's that? Are there two of you that are this stupid?
> >
>
> Okay, another lonely, flaming asshole dismissed...NEXT!!!!!
Dude, your ENTIRE REPLY has been nothing but "lonely flames."
peeceersb...@hotmail.com
wrote:
>You are blocked from sending me e-mail again,
NYAH NYAH NYAH NYAH NYAN NAH
and this post/e-mail was
>reported to Earthlink abuse.
LOL- if you can't stand the heat...
---------------------------------------------------------
Cyberdog ---A Product of Apple Computer, Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------
peeceersb...@hotmail.com
wrote:
this post/e-mail was
>reported to Earthlink abuse.
Oh, and don't forget abuse@navix,net, too ; )
Alex Cain
>
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 11:59 AM, Alex Cain <mailto:alex...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >You are blocked from sending me e-mail again,
>
> NYAH NYAH NYAH NYAH NYAN
A bit pissed off, are we? Tough turkeys.
>
> and this post/e-mail was
> >reported to Earthlink abuse.
>
> LOL- if you can't stand the heat...
I can "stand the heat" just fine. But it's obvious you're a one-sided
moron who can't hold an intelligible conversation.