"3- Craig Chilton 3- left are balls behind my small pennis pointing in
my interest area, right is shit " <xanadu...@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:0f6g75l9oi81j0o27ero7aacsa4j05gvds@4ax.com...

Normal sex begats kids, which is the whole moral point of the
necessity of marriage.  Why do two male buttfuc*ers need to marry
except as a kind of social vanity?

Without the rules and obligations of marriage, humans are no
better than animals;  we would live in social chaos since guys would
not stick around to take care of their kids.   They would be going
around  fuc*ing this ho and that ho and be having kids everywhere who
would have no father to take care of them.
this is why we need marriage.  This is why marriage grew out of
sexuality.  Sexuality without moral rules leads to animalistic chaos.
We want moral and social order. Marriage is crucial in this regard.

If there was no marriage, mankind would invent marriage to accomodate
social and moral needs of society.
Indeed, every human community have come up with something like
marriage.
It is a human necessity to regulate sexual energies and to provide
stability for new born kids

If  guys wanna live together and slap each other in the ass
 don't tell me that I have to consider such behavior normal or
that it's sufficient to be regarded as the basis for marriage.

If no one slapped each other in the ass, humanity would go
on.   Ass slapping is truly arbitrary, trivial, or gratuitous. but,
sexual reproduction is the very foundation of life.  it is NOT
arbitrary. it is FUNDAMENTAL.    If there is no sexual reproduction,
there is no human species. So marriage  serves a very
important human function.    Marriage regulates and accomodates the
fact of sexual reproduction.   Since we wanna be more than animals, we
don't just wanna have sex . We also wanna create an orderly society.
to do this, we need moral rules to govern our sexual behavior.
marriage serves this purpose. Don't tell me that  that two guys
fuc*ing each other in the ass is marriage.

If species don't fuc* and sexually reproduce, it dies out.  sexual
reproduction is NECESSARY for humanity to go on.  and sexual
reproduction happens between male and female.  the point of marriage
is to remind us that this male/female relationship shouldn't only be
sexual but moral and social.  if a couple produces kids, it's THEIR
responsibility to raise the kids. they created the kids, so it's their
responsiblity. marriage is about that moral obligation.  it is not a
lifestyle game. hetero sex is real sex, real reproduction. it is
the essential basis as to why humans exist.
marriage is about the institutionalization of that fact.
hetero-sex is absolutely necessary for the species to go on. if there
was ONLY hetero-sex, humanity would go on.  but, if there was only
homo-sex and no hetero-sex, humanity would die out in one generation.
heterosexuality is basic, essential, fundamental, etc.    gay or homo
sex is unnecessary to humanity  it is the behavior among sexually
defective individuals.

Marriage is an institution that is linked with healthy sexuality as it
must be because it is about sexual morality.

Homosexuals like material advatage of marriage, so although they are agains
family (see Chilton spam posts hating family and call everything having the
world family in is against freedom), so they want same sex marriage JUST FOR
MONEY ADVANTAGE. "

It is nice when everyone is forced to pay for AIDS medicines for my deviant
sex habits" is the hidden agenda of so call "Egalitarians", "Libertarians",
"Feminists (read lesbians), etc.

marriage is about obligations and duties and bonds.
when a couple enter into marriage, they are surrendering
certain freedoms and even rights.  a man without kids can do as he
pleases with his money.   but, a man with a wife and kids is morally
obligated--thru marriage vows--to spend his money for the welfare of
his wife and kids.  it's not against the law to not feed hungry kids
of someone else; it is against the law to starve your own kids.

for example, you wear glasses and have poor eyesight.   okay, that
doesn't mean you're a bad person. but, you shouldn't expect us to
consider poor eyesight as good or healthy.  it is a defect, and one
must deal with it the best way one can.

problem is gay agenda folks will not even accept that homosexuality is
a defect.  they say it's sexually just as legitimate as
heterosexuality. what is the rational or scientific basis for this?
what does ass-fuc*ing have to do with reproduction which is the
essential nature of sexuality?

all defects have disadvantages.  that's why it's called a defect.   if
you're deaf, you can't hear.  if you're blind, you can't see.  if you
have no limbs, you can't walk.  if you're gay, you can't have kids
thru gay sex.  but, they wanna force us to regard gayness as normal.
also, though they can't have kids thru gay sex, they want the right to
adopt children who were created thru hetero-sex. think about it: gay couple
want kids. but,
their defective sexuality can't produce kids.  but, they wanna pretend that
it can.  so they
adopt a kid and then say 'this is OUR kid' as though they brought the
kid into this world.

it is SEXUALLY unhealthy.   a gay person can be healthy in many or
most other ways. he could be athletic, have good eating and sleeping
regimen.  so, i'm not saying a gay person is entirely unhealthy.
also, a hetero person can be a fat hideous diseased slob.  so, being
hetero doesn't mean that one is entirely healthy.
but, gay sexuality is unhealthy sexually.  just think about it:  a
sexual organ inserted into a shi**ing organ.  would you stick your
wiener up a tube full of fecal matter?

deaf-mutes are defective in hearing, and we should accept that fact.
but, deaf-mute should NOT expect the rest of us to regard deaf-
muteness as normal or healthy and qualified for positions in society
that require hearing.

similarly..

homos are defective in sexuality, and we should accept that fact. but,
homos should NOT expect the rest of us to regard homosexuality as
normal or healthy and therefore as the basis for marriage.

gay sex is defective sex.  we must not legitimiate the
defective, the unhealthy, the abnormal--if it offers no advantage.

I think when a guy has a dick but acts like he has a pussy, he's
messed up.   The idea of clint eastwood in a bikini walking like a
fruitcake is NOT messed up?????  it's just 'different'?

trans are gay.  to be sure, not all gays are transvetite-ish.  some
gays are very macho and masulin.  but, they still don't emotionally
understand that their bodies were designed for sexual union with the
other sex.  when two guys grab each other's balls and fuc* each other
in the ass, that is messed up.

I aint talking of a creator when i say 'designed'.  i'm talking
figuratively;  i mean the organs developed for those purposes.  look
at the human body and organs have purposes.  if you don't believe me,
try to see thru your ears or hear thru your nose or walk on your hair
or eat with your ass."