Message from discussion
Actually, he's worse than Elim
From: Commander Thelea <LusankyaNNOLuS...@Aol.com.invalid>
Subject: Re: Actually, he's worse than Elim
Date: 2000/04/28
Message-ID: <3198e398.56158d25@usw-ex0102-016.remarq.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 616811146
References: <02ca427e.801b6ba2@usw-ex0103-024.remarq.com><2d723f8c.5ed7af3e@usw-ex0108-063.remarq.com> <B52F47BC.CDEA%jonathan@jboyd.co.uk>
Bytes: 1608
X-Originating-Host: 152.163.206.189
X-Complaints-To: wrenabuse@remarq.com
X-Trace: WReNphoon3 956935376 10.0.2.16 (Fri, 28 Apr 2000 08:22:56 PDT)
Organization: http://www.remarq.com: The World's Usenet/Discussions Start Here
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 08:22:56 PDT
Newsgroups: alt.startrek.vs.starwars
X-Wren-Trace: eEZjS0pTFF4VKkddQghMVlV7dmJMTkhTTEcJFBoAEVcfE0gVGFAdGRIe
In article <B52F47BC.CDEA%jonat...@jboyd.co.uk>, Jonathan Boyd
<jonat...@jboyd.co.uk> wrote:
>in article 2d723f8c.5ed7a...@usw-ex0108-063.remarq.com,
Commander Thelea at
>LusankyaNNOLuS...@Aol.com.invalid wrote on 28/4/00 2:07 am:
>
>> Kynes IS CORRECT.
>>
>> IF! AND ONLY IF! You take the phaser power listed in the
>> technical manuals, assume that photon torpedoes are
>> automatically of similiar power to explain why phasers are
used
>> at all, and do not accept the Shield Frequency/Phaser
>> Frequency/NDF theory that explains why a 1 gigawatt weapon can
>> function as a 10-20,000 terawatt weapon.
>>
>> Quite simply, what he's doing is taking the phaser firepower
>> straight out of the technical manual, assuming that's the
>> literal, maximum firepower, and then, with incidents like the
>> photon torpedo in Star Trek V to support him, scales torpedo
>> firepower down to match, and hence his figures make perfect
>> sense.
>>
>> Kynes is not a troll... He's simply a person who refuses to
>> believe that NDF exists.
>
>Actually it si a theory that makes absolutely no sense since
weapons of that
>strength couldn't possibly drill through planets.
>--
>Jonathan
>AIM: BoydClone | STvsSW website:
http://www.jboyd.co.uk/index.html
>
>
>
I never claimed his theory made sense.. I just was explaining
what I thought it was.. And then he later corrected me.
Marina O'Leary
"Ut Veniant Omnes!"
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!