To put it in more comprehendable terms, he believes 1.2
*billion* peregrine fighters are nescesary for this task.
That's just to remove the shields, not destroy the ship.
And I thought Elim's "100 million TIEs needed to destroy the
Defiant" was the depths of Troll depravity. Unshielded TIEs of
course.
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
Yawn... two points
1) Prove him wrong instead of calling him a wanker.
2) Some people like to make jokes on topics settled years ago.
Kynes IS CORRECT.
IF! AND ONLY IF! You take the phaser power listed in the
technical manuals, assume that photon torpedoes are
automatically of similiar power to explain why phasers are used
at all, and do not accept the Shield Frequency/Phaser
Frequency/NDF theory that explains why a 1 gigawatt weapon can
function as a 10-20,000 terawatt weapon.
Quite simply, what he's doing is taking the phaser firepower
straight out of the technical manual, assuming that's the
literal, maximum firepower, and then, with incidents like the
photon torpedo in Star Trek V to support him, scales torpedo
firepower down to match, and hence his figures make perfect
sense.
Kynes is not a troll... He's simply a person who refuses to
believe that NDF exists.
Marina O'Leary
"Ut Veniant Omnes!"
So you believe that it takes about 121,951,219,600 megatons to take down an
ISD's shields?
--
We are the Borg. Lower your shields and weapon systems.
Your cultural and technological distinctiveness will be added
to our own. You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile.
My apologies about that mistake.. Mis-interpetations, and all.
And sorry about that bloody post that I hit post to soon with,
too..
Marina O'Leary
"Ut Veniant Omnes!"
>
> Kynes IS CORRECT.
>
> IF! AND ONLY IF! You take the phaser power listed in the
> technical manuals, assume that photon torpedoes are
> automatically of similiar power to explain why phasers are used
> at all, and do not accept the Shield Frequency/Phaser
> Frequency/NDF theory that explains why a 1 gigawatt weapon can
> function as a 10-20,000 terawatt weapon.
Actually, I'm correct if you believe 13cm-long micro-torpedoes are
>
>:
>: Kynes IS CORRECT.
>:
>: IF! AND ONLY IF! You take the phaser power listed in the
>:technical manuals, assume that photon torpedoes are
>:automatically of similiar power to explain why phasers are used
>:at all, and do not accept the Shield Frequency/Phaser
>:Frequency/NDF theory that explains why a 1 gigawatt weapon can
>:function as a 10-20,000 terawatt weapon.
>:
>: Quite simply, what he's doing is taking the phaser firepower
>:straight out of the technical manual, assuming that's the
>:literal, maximum firepower, and then, with incidents like the
>:photon torpedo in Star Trek V to support him, scales torpedo
>:firepower down to match, and hence his figures make perfect
>:sense.
>:
>: Kynes is not a troll... He's simply a person who refuses to
>:believe that NDF exists.
>
>
>So you believe that it takes about 121,951,219,600 megatons to take down an
>ISD's shields?
Considering that's 5e26 joules, that's right around one of the
moderate-high shield limits.
Eric
remove NO.SPAM.DAMMIT to mail
"Sufficiently advanced technology is often indistinguishable
from magic." - Clarke's Third Law
First of all, he was talking about an attack using torps. So
your phaser power calculations are (probably) irrelevant. I may
be missing something though...
Secondly, if you think he is correct, and that billions of
peregrines would be needed to take an ISD, how many TIEs would
you estimate for the same task? 50? 100? Do you believe one TIE
fighter = several million peregrines?
(I don't know how many TIEs you would say would be needed. I'm
just pointing out that if you gave a number that was something
like 100, you would effectively be saying that one TIE = more
than a million Peregrines, which is totally out of keeping with
both observed canon and common sense.) If a peregrine was a
million times less powerful than a TIE, it wouldn't be capable
of scratching the paint on a car roof.
> Kynes is not a troll... He's simply a person who refuses to
>believe that NDF exists.
Well, he said himself that NDF does exist.
> Kynes IS CORRECT.
>
> IF! AND ONLY IF! You take the phaser power listed in the
> technical manuals, assume that photon torpedoes are
> automatically of similiar power to explain why phasers are used
> at all, and do not accept the Shield Frequency/Phaser
> Frequency/NDF theory that explains why a 1 gigawatt weapon can
> function as a 10-20,000 terawatt weapon.
>
> Quite simply, what he's doing is taking the phaser firepower
> straight out of the technical manual, assuming that's the
> literal, maximum firepower, and then, with incidents like the
> photon torpedo in Star Trek V to support him, scales torpedo
> firepower down to match, and hence his figures make perfect
> sense.
>
> Kynes is not a troll... He's simply a person who refuses to
> believe that NDF exists.
Actually it si a theory that makes absolutely no sense since weapons of that
strength couldn't possibly drill through planets.
--
Jonathan
AIM: BoydClone | STvsSW website: http://www.jboyd.co.uk/index.html
I never claimed his theory made sense.. I just was explaining
what I thought it was.. And then he later corrected me.
Marina O'Leary
"Ut Veniant Omnes!"
> >So you believe that it takes about 121,951,219,600 megatons to take
> >down an ISD's shields?
>
> Considering that's 5e26 joules, that's right around one of the
> moderate-high shield limits.
We've also read other phrases that imply very high limits.
"Constant rain" of asteroids "hitting like multi-megaton concussion
bombs"
'Gigaton recoil'
etc.
C.S.Strowbridge
> I never claimed his theory made sense.. I just was explaining
> what I thought it was.. And then he later corrected me.
Okay. Just making sure no one else thought it made sense.