Insulting
mike3
I don't care how much you disagree with, NOTHING
gives you the right to insult anyone. I could present
a formal paper defining my compelte theory and all
the damning evidence, you could reject it as much
as you want, but just because you would reject it
doesn't give you the right to insult. Once you accept
that, then I will leave.
Spyderizer
No one insults you because they feel they have the right to, they do it
because it's funny.
C.S.Strowbridge
> Hi.
Hi Mike!
MORE THREADS, MORE THREADS, YEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
Anyhoo, we have the right to insult anyone because we live in a free
society and because of that we can insult anyone we want any time we
want. And with that in mind, Dalton, you are an asshole.
C.S.Strowbridge
Matt Huang
>society
err? Then I'll have a ribeye sandwich and steak-fries to go, please.
>and because of that we can insult anyone we want any time we
>want. And with that in mind, Dalton, you are an asshole.
heh.
-Just waiting for that class III license-
Chuck
"mike3" <mike...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:tlERc.606$Ny....@news01.roc.ny...
run away every time I start kicking your ass. If you stood your ground or
admitted you are wrong I wouldn't, but since you're such a big pussy, you're
inviting ridicule. You're practically demanding an RSVP for ridicule, and
are hiring catering and a band to entertain it upon arrival. That's the
problem with your analogy; no one who writes a formal paper runs away from
all criticism and then writes a new one on the same subject that ignores all
that criticism (except for those that *are* ridiculed in the scientific
community). If you stop acting like a big pussy and stick to a topic,
things might change.
--
Chuck
Join the revolution
http://www.keepitcoming.net/galactic-revolution.html
Dalton
Suck my balls, fool.
--
"I think it's the duty of the comedian to find out where the
line is drawn and cross it deliberately." --George Carlin
Dalton
Eat my feces, you fucking canuck.
C.S.Strowbridge
> C.S.Strowbridge wrote:
>> Anyhoo, we have the right to insult anyone because we live in a free
>> society and because of that we can insult anyone we want any time we
>> want. And with that in mind, Dalton, you are an asshole.
>
> Eat my feces, you fucking canuck.
Like you didn't see that coming. You'd have to be some kind of half wit,
brain dead looosss... nevermind.
C.S.Strowbridge
Stuart Mackey
You are a shit eating camel fucker
I have insulted you, so what are you going to do about it you whining little
prison bitch? :)
Have a nice day.
Dalton
Oh, oh, that's only about ten years old. Asshole.
mike3
I do try and back them up but YOU WON'T LISTEN. Also, I'm abandoning
those threads in preparation for a big one-on-one debate, but not with
you.
C.S.Strowbridge
> "Chuck" wrote:
>> I insult you only because you insist on not backing up your arguments
>> and run away every time I start kicking your ass.
[SNIP!]
> I do try and back them up but YOU WON'T LISTEN.
Not accepting your theory and not listening to it are two different things.
We've listened, we've evaluated, we've compared.
We've come to the conclusion that DET, even with some possible minor
abnormalities, is better than MCR without a mechanism.
C.S.Strowbridge
Chuck
Bullshit. You have run away from me on every occassion, then went on
crowing your same old opinions. I had evidence, you respond with strawmen,
and you think that counts as *me* not listening to *you*? Lying isn't going
to convince anybody, stupid.
> Also, I'm abandoning
> those threads in preparation for a big one-on-one debate, but not with
> you.
Aw, my heart is broken. And I was so looking forward to another round of
you ignoring your opponent's arguments, making unreasonable demands,
defending your points with vague handwaving, and then crying like a little
girl with a scraped knee because you get flamed.
I repeat: Big - fucking - pussy.
mike3
I do have the evidence, but I don't have a server to put it on, and
whenever I present something, such as the calculation of the 1e29 J
figure for the death star, YOU run off.
Also, I haven't given you any evidence because I'm ABANDONING those
threads!
> > Also, I'm abandoning
> > those threads in preparation for a big one-on-one debate, but not with
> > you.
>
> Aw, my heart is broken. And I was so looking forward to another round of
> you ignoring your opponent's arguments, making unreasonable demands,
> defending your points with vague handwaving, and then crying like a little
> girl with a scraped knee because you get flamed.
> I repeat: Big - fucking - pussy.
Well, you can watch the debate, but your comments won't influence it.
Chuck
Yeah, I'm sure in you're little fantasy world, with lollipop trees and
houses made of gingerbread, you've won every argument too. I pointed out
the error in your assumption, you retaliated with your typical "let's ignore
science" bullshit, Namothil corrected you, I agreed with her because it was
EXACTLY what I was going to say, and you didn't respond. You, on the other
hand, never responded to the canon debate, never responded to the warp
strafing debate, you're starting all these discussions and unwilling to see
them through when you get your ass kicked.
>
> Also, I haven't given you any evidence because I'm ABANDONING those
> threads!
Yes, there's a term for that: running away.
>
> > > Also, I'm abandoning
> > > those threads in preparation for a big one-on-one debate, but not with
> > > you.
> >
> > Aw, my heart is broken. And I was so looking forward to another round
of
> > you ignoring your opponent's arguments, making unreasonable demands,
> > defending your points with vague handwaving, and then crying like a
little
> > girl with a scraped knee because you get flamed.
> > I repeat: Big - fucking - pussy.
>
> Well, you can watch the debate, but your comments won't influence it.
Blah blah blah, watching this debate is going to be like Bambi versus
Godzilla, with you in the role of roadkill. Your exagerated sense of
self-importance is yet another reason you're insulted: you suck at this, but
you seem convinced that you are dominating the field. You'll probably hold
the same delusion that Darks Tar had when he lost to Wong...
Lurker
<snip>
> I do have the evidence, but I don't have a server to put it on, and
> whenever I present something, such as the calculation of the 1e29 J
> figure for the death star, YOU run off.
I've been watching your debates and have yet to see you post any
evidence or calculations.
Do you have new footage that these seasoned debators have never
seen before? is that why you need to upload it to a server?
> Also, I haven't given you any evidence because I'm ABANDONING those
> threads!
Ah so you admit to not presenting any evidence.
Namothil
> "mike3" <mike...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1d54b7e4.04081...@posting.google.com...
>
>>"Chuck" <sonn...@sfdebris.com> wrote in message
>
> news:<2nt020F...@uni-berlin.de>...
>
>
>>>and you think that counts as *me* not listening to *you*? Lying isn't
>
> going
>
>>>to convince anybody, stupid.
>>>
>>
>>I do have the evidence, but I don't have a server to put it on, and
>>whenever I present something, such as the calculation of the 1e29 J
>>figure for the death star, YOU run off.
>
>
> Yeah, I'm sure in you're little fantasy world, with lollipop trees and
> houses made of gingerbread, you've won every argument too. I pointed out
> the error in your assumption, you retaliated with your typical "let's ignore
> science" bullshit, Namothil corrected you, I agreed with her because it was
Him.
Chuck
"Namothil" <ra...@purdue.edu> wrote in message
news:2nvhc8F...@uni-berlin.de...
wonder if Hallmark makes a card for this. "I'm sorry I thought you were a
chick..."
Namothil
> "Namothil" <ra...@purdue.edu> wrote in message
> news:2nvhc8F...@uni-berlin.de...
>
>>Chuck wrote:
>>
>>>"mike3" <mike...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>news:1d54b7e4.04081...@posting.google.com...
>>>
>>>houses made of gingerbread, you've won every argument too. I pointed
>
> out
>
>>>the error in your assumption, you retaliated with your typical "let's
>
> ignore
>
>>>science" bullshit, Namothil corrected you, I agreed with her because it
>
> was
>
>>Him.
>>
>
> I'm sorry, I thought you were Raven. My bad. Boy is this embarrassing... I
> wonder if Hallmark makes a card for this. "I'm sorry I thought you were a
> chick..."
Uh, okay. I'm guessing you thought that because of the e-mail
address. (A y is easy to mistake for a v when you're in a
hurry.) Changed address for posting so that won't happen again.
(General note - DO NOT send e-mail to the new address - I don't
check it.)
Wayne Poe
"mike3" <mike...@yahoo.com> wrote
Please go fuck yourself with Scooter's index finger. You singlehandedly put
the "dumb" in "motherfucker".
Dalton
LMAO!!
Wayne Poe
"Dalton" <dalto...@hotmail.com>
> > Please go fuck yourself with Scooter's index finger. You singlehandedly
put
> > the "dumb" in "motherfucker".
> LMAO!!
Cool, I thought you missed that one! ;)
mike3
"C.S.Strowbridge" <csstro...@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:Xns9540D03DD8E...@24.64.223.211...
No. It's not right to insult. If it was, then insults would be acceptable
behavior in public places. Which they're not. Internet newsgroups
are also "public places", it's jsut that they are accessed via computer.
If the society is free, then why are there laws?
> C.S.Strowbridge
C.S.Strowbridge
> "C.S.Strowbridge" wrote:
>> > Hi.
>>
>> Hi Mike!
>>
>> > I don't care how much you disagree with, NOTHING
>> > gives you the right to insult anyone. I could present
>> > a formal paper defining my compelte theory and all
>> > the damning evidence, you could reject it as much
>> > as you want, but just because you would reject it
>> > doesn't give you the right to insult. Once you accept
>> > that, then I will leave.
>>
>> MORE THREADS, MORE THREADS, YEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
>>
>> Anyhoo, we have the right to insult anyone because we live in a free
>> society and because of that we can insult anyone we want any time we
>> want. And with that in mind, Dalton, you are an asshole.
>
> No. It's not right to insult.
A right, a right. Freedom of expression.
> If it was, then insults would be
> acceptable behavior in public places. Which they're not. Internet
> newsgroups are also "public places", it's jsut that they are accessed
> via computer.
>
> If the society is free, then why are there laws?
There's no law against insulting people.
C.S.Strowbridge
Jedinerd
Buh-bye now. Please don't write or call, we might have other fool's egos to shred.
mike3
> "mike3" wrote:
> > "C.S.Strowbridge" wrote:
>
> >> > Hi.
> >>
> >> Hi Mike!
> >>
> >> > I don't care how much you disagree with, NOTHING
> >> > gives you the right to insult anyone. I could present
> >> > a formal paper defining my compelte theory and all
> >> > the damning evidence, you could reject it as much
> >> > as you want, but just because you would reject it
> >> > doesn't give you the right to insult. Once you accept
> >> > that, then I will leave.
> >>
> >> MORE THREADS, MORE THREADS, YEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
> >>
> >> Anyhoo, we have the right to insult anyone because we live in a free
> >> society and because of that we can insult anyone we want any time we
> >> want. And with that in mind, Dalton, you are an asshole.
> >
> > No. It's not right to insult.
>
> A right, a right. Freedom of expression.
>
Which is a moral right that is constrained by other moral issues. According
to your logic, then you should be able to insult in public.
> > If it was, then insults would be
> > acceptable behavior in public places. Which they're not. Internet
> > newsgroups are also "public places", it's jsut that they are accessed
> > via computer.
> >
> > If the society is free, then why are there laws?
>
> There's no law against insulting people.
>
But this is not a legal question. The fact that you seem to think it's OK
means that you have no sense of what's right and what's wrong. Insults
make you a school bully. That's what you guys look like saying 'em --
big school bullies.
> C.S.Strowbridge
Graeme Dice
> "C.S.Strowbridge" <csstro...@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> news:Xns954AE1114AA...@24.64.223.211...
<snip>
>>A right, a right. Freedom of expression.
>>
>
>
> Which is a moral right that is constrained by other moral issues. According
> to your logic, then you should be able to insult in public.
You _are_ allowed to insult other people in public.
Graeme Dice
--
"If the universe of discourse permits the possibility of time
travel and of changing the past, then no means of time travel
will be discovered in that universe."
-- Niven's Law
Chuck
> > A right, a right. Freedom of expression.
> >
>
> Which is a moral right that is constrained by other moral issues.
According
> to your logic, then you should be able to insult in public.
Do you live in a cave? You think people *don't* insult others in public
places, public media, public forums? John Kerry told reporters his secret
service protector was a son of a bitch. Dennis Miller called Michael Moore
a stupid moron. People have the right to express their opinions, you stupid
little fascist.
> > There's no law against insulting people.
> >
>
> But this is not a legal question. The fact that you seem to think it's OK
> means that you have no sense of what's right and what's wrong. Insults
> make you a school bully. That's what you guys look like saying 'em --
> big school bullies.
>
Considering your record for seeing things that aren't there, your
perceptions are firmly positioned between jack and shit. You think we're
bullies for not taking your repeated timsults with a smile, fine; it's just
one more moronic opinion you have for us to throw on the growing landfill of
your dumbass opinions.
Chuck
C.S.Strowbridge
> "C.S.Strowbridge" wrote:
>>> No. It's not right to insult.
>>
>> A right, a right. Freedom of expression.
>
> Which is a moral right that is constrained by other moral issues.
> According to your logic, then you should be able to insult in public.
Yep. And we can. I do it all the time.
>>> If it was, then insults would be
>>> acceptable behavior in public places. Which they're not. Internet
>>> newsgroups are also "public places", it's jsut that they are
>>> accessed via computer.
>>>
>>> If the society is free, then why are there laws?
>>
>> There's no law against insulting people.
>
> But this is not a legal question. The fact that you seem to think it's
> OK means that you have no sense of what's right and what's wrong.
No sense of right and wrong? It's a fucking insult. Suck it up ya big
baby.
> Insults make you a school bully. That's what you guys look like saying
> 'em -- big school bullies.
I can live with that. I'd much rather be thought of as a big bully than
an ignorant prick.
BTW, people don't think of me as a bully, they think of me as an asshole.
C.S.Strowbridge
DanielSBen
Damn fucking shit!
Insults are perfactly legal and acceptable. They're rude as hell, but
giving someone an insult is okay.
And you'd better damn well fucking believe it!
-DanielSBen