Chuck Spears laid this down on his screen :
> On 27/09/2015 13:40, ]v [etaphoid <m...@phoid.con> wrote:
>> on 25/09/2015, Paul Pot supposed :
>>> ]v[etaphoid explained :
>>>> Ron submitted this idea :
>>>>> ]v[etaphoid was thinking very hard :
>>>>>> on 24/09/2015, Ron supposed :
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No worries.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just send me a stamped, self-addressed envelope and I'll shoot
>>>>>> some
>>>>>> over to you poste-haste...
>>>>>
>>>>> Post em online if you want
>>>>
>>>> What a grubby suggestion, Won!
>>>>
>>>> Revenge porn should be outlawed as a low form of domentic
>>>> violence...
>>>
>>> It has been outlawed you coupon-using foreign idiot.
>>>
>>> FAF!!111110
>>
>> Good morning my little lapdog!
>>
>> Don't get so upset over all this banter, fella. We're just hear for
>> a
>> laugh.
>>
>> At your expense...
>>
>>
http://tinyurl.com/pxuth22
>
> There are a few different ways to interpret the absence of a reply
> on Usenet. You have obviously gone for that one but that seems to
> conflict with the term 'lapdog'. That term, it seems to me, should
> apply to the last poster in the thread.
>
> (I rule myself out, on the grounds that it's my first post and it's
> been very slow in this group, in the last few days.)
Whenever I'm bored I just throw the mutt a bone. Any more than that and
he starts leg-humping which inevitably ends in a pmd fetish and
stalking. Seen it many times over the years, same thing, different
kook. Bored with it. What we need is entertaining by a proper *troll*
who doesn't get too giddy and wet his pants.
Pity Pope buggered off.