This new law that's in place
b
can somebody tell me under which act of Parliament it states that earnings
must only be spent on the business/industry from which that money was
derived?
Luckily for Timmy Sky TV only exists due to the propping up, in the early
days, of the company from
massive injections of cash earned through Murdochs newspaper empire.
Which, strangely enough, leads us to the source of much of Man U's income,
yes Timmy,
not from the terraces mate, but from the the pockets of Sun readers.
How ironic.....
--
"The state of our pitch wouldnt have affected Liverpool. -with their game
the ball is in the air most of the time"
Norman
"b" <bi...@thefridge.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:DRT1g.105014$8Q3....@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> Timmy keeps going on about money being 'earnt' on the field of play,
> can somebody tell me under which act of Parliament it states that earnings
> must only be spent on the business/industry from which that money was
> derived?
>
> Luckily for Timmy Sky TV only exists due to the propping up, in the early
> days, of the company from
> massive injections of cash earned through Murdochs newspaper empire.
>
> Which, strangely enough, leads us to the source of much of Man U's income,
> yes Timmy,
> not from the terraces mate, but from the the pockets of Sun readers.
> How ironic.....
YAWN.
JAB
No answers yet again Norma ... no wonder you are the laughing stock of
even your own NG.
Norman
"JAB" <noch...@nohope.com> wrote in message
news:gqU1g.37126$zf1....@newsfe5-gui.ntli.net...
You keep making these bizarre unsubstantiated claims JAB.
And it's you who's avoiding my question. Go on. Answer it.
JAB
> Timmy keeps going on about money being 'earnt' on the field of play,
> can somebody tell me under which act of Parliament it states that earnings
> must only be spent on the business/industry from which that money was
> derived?
>
The one that said he didn't give a shit where the money came from right
up to the point that Man U didn't have the most money ...
JAB
What's that do I hear a bitter little boring man ... are yes it's Norma
the clown of the NGs.
Norman
JAB, you keep making up things I'm supposed to have said. Obviously because
you struggle to argue with the things I've actually said.
Are you hoping no one will notice?
b
Oh right! you mean the '2003 Manchester United must be
the richest club in the world and must win the league 8 years out of ten or
else Act'
repealed in 2004?
Norman
As complete a capitulation as you could hope to see.
Pathetic.
JAB
Yep that's the one ... isn't it funny how some of the Man U fans were
fine about money when they were top dog but as soon as Chelsea had more
finical clout it was so unfair. At least when Arsenal fans talk about it
they are not being hypocrites.
JAB
There it is again ... what a joke you are Norma.
b
>> As complete a capitulation as you could hope to see.
>>
>> Pathetic.
>
> There it is again ... what a joke you are Norma.
Give Norm his due, he never gets nasty and personal like that other
kilfilled twat.
He talks the same amount of bollox mind!
JAB
True he's not in the same league as say Harvey or Ted but as you say he
really can talk some complete rubbish when it comes to 'defending' Man U.
RED DEVIL
For what it's worth...
I don't give a flying rats arse where Chelsea (or anyone else) get
their money from. If the Russian had wanted to buy United he would
have and there would be nothing we could do about it. The rest of the
club's (United included) need to stop whining and get on with the
business of trying to catch Chelsea. It's all horseshit and not even
worth all these threads.
Norman
And yet it's you who's repeatedly failed to address my points and displayed
that you know nothing about football.
Well done.
Norman
Rubbish like, 'winning the EPL is a better achievement than winning the
Treble'?
I think that is the out and out winner for biggest load of shite statement
in the history of Usenet.
Wouldn't you?
JAB
> "JAB" <noch...@nohope.com> wrote in message
> news:aUU1g.363$Y6...@newsfe3-win.ntli.net...
>> b wrote:
>>> "JAB" <noch...@nohope.com> wrote in message
>>> news:jKU1g.37132$zf1....@newsfe5-gui.ntli.net...
>>>
>>>>> As complete a capitulation as you could hope to see.
>>>>>
>>>>> Pathetic.
>>>> There it is again ... what a joke you are Norma.
>>> Give Norm his due, he never gets nasty and personal like that other
>>> kilfilled twat.
>>> He talks the same amount of bollox mind!
>>>
>>>
>> True he's not in the same league as say Harvey or Ted but as you say he
>> really can talk some complete rubbish when it comes to 'defending' Man U.
>
>
> Rubbish like, 'winning the EPL is a better achievement than winning the
> Treble'?
>
> I think that is the out and out winner for biggest load of shite statement
> in the history of Usenet.
>
> Wouldn't you?
>
>
Oh dear (yet again) Norma, you do like to claim things don't you. Try
and have a look back to the posts and see what was actually said instead
of this incoherent ranting that you tend to post. Probably best if you
move in with Harvey and Ted as you will be right at home.
Norman
Just for clarity - Are you now trying to claim that you didn't mean Chelsea
winning the EPL was a greater achievement than United's Treble?
Cheers,
JAB
Poor little Norm crying into his cup again. Just except it, the current
Chelsea side are better than the Man U side of the 90s just as another
side will be better than Chelsea's current side. Even someone with as
little understanding of football as you must be able to comprehend this
or maybe not judging by the normal level of your posts.
Simon
Norman
? You don't half come up with some weird stuff mate. Anyone'd think you were
losing the argument.
Just except it, the current
> Chelsea side are better than the Man U side of the 90s just as another
> side will be better than Chelsea's current side. Even someone with as
> little understanding of football as you must be able to comprehend this or
> maybe not judging by the normal level of your posts.
If only the quality of a side was judged by your say so. Unfortunately for
you they are judged by what they win.
Chelsea have so far won a single solitary EPL. They did so easily with a
record points total. You still only get the one trophy.
United have 8 Premierships. Several doubles and a Treble.
You have been shite in the CL. You have not managed to win the double. You
haven't come within a million miles of the Treble. And your style of
football is mind-numbingly turgid, like a billionaire's version of
Wimbledon.
When you have won the Treble and 8 Premierships, never mind 15 league titles
in all, then, provided we haven't added to our tally, then you might not
look like such a complete arrogant looney with your claims.
Until then mate
Cuckoo.
It's been fun.
Ian Harvey
>> Cheers,
>
> Poor little Norm crying into his cup again. Just except it, the current
> Chelsea side are better than the Man U side of the 90s just as another
Based on what, you armchair inhabiting joker?
Ian Harvey
"Norman" <Norm...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Uh32g.37398$zf1....@newsfe5-gui.ntli.net...
And yet it's you who's repeatedly failed to address my points and displayed
> that you know nothing about football.
He demonstrated that with his post and virtually every single one since.