> Anyone else remember YIDDO and his mates swarming all over usenet
> around Christmas telling us how Spurs were now the top club in
> London?
> PMSL!!!
> Haven't been seeing much of him lately have we??
> HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAA
> Spurs - the only football club in the top four who remain MTN
> (Mid-Table Nobodies) PIMSL!!!
> FAF!!!
hehe shame...and it was all looking so rosey for them at one stage....
3rd in the League...above us...2-0 up at the Emirates....glad we could
be the ones that brought them down the earth with a thud...now
London's other big boys squashing them like real little spuddies :-)
erm why?? Chelsea are a top side who have fallen on hard times. See where they are in Europe? See where Spurs are?
Spurs are *perpetual pretenders* who, even at their best, are a pathetic laughing stock. The more they aspire to greatness the more they stay the same. Anybody could have told you today they would play pretty football everywhere except where it matters and then get picked off by Chelsea.
Good riddance. Mid-table rubbish is all they are and top of the list of Man Utd poodles.
<popepompousxv...@popesnews.invalid> wrote:
> Google Beta User wrote on 15/4/12 :
> > I'd still rather they got 4th than Chelsea.
> erm why?? Chelsea are a top side who have fallen on hard times. See
> where they are in Europe? See where Spurs are?
> Spurs are *perpetual pretenders* who, even at their best, are a
> pathetic laughing stock. The more they aspire to greatness the more
> they stay the same. Anybody could have told you today they would
> play pretty football everywhere except where it matters and then
> get picked off by Chelsea.
> Good riddance. Mid-table rubbish is all they are and top of the
> list of Man Utd poodles.
Its ironic how spending money, winning nothing and finishing outside
the top four now gets you an international job, when it used to get
you the sack
> On Apr 15, 8:19 pm, Pope Pompous XVIII
> <popepompousxv...@popesnews.invalid> wrote:
>> HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAA!!!
>> Anyone else remember YIDDO and his mates swarming all over usenet
>> around Christmas telling us how Spurs were now the top club in
>> London?
>> PMSL!!!
>> Haven't been seeing much of him lately have we??
>> HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAA
>> Spurs - the only football club in the top four who remain MTN
>> (Mid-Table Nobodies) PIMSL!!!
>> FAF!!!
> hehe shame...and it was all looking so rosey for them at one > stage.... 3rd in the League...above us...2-0 up at the > Emirates....glad we could be the ones that brought them down the > earth with a thud...now London's other big boys squashing them like > real little spuddies :-)
Yes - it's just a shame Arsenal don't enjoy the same cosy relationship with Spurs and Everton and Villa that Man Utd enjoy or they'd be streets ahead of the rest. But at least they are ahead in the honour stakes, with Man Utd lagging far behind.
Are you listening Ashley Young? What good is a title when you have to cheat your way to the top?
> On Apr 15, 8:06 pm, Pope Pompous XVIII
> <popepompousxv...@popesnews.invalid> wrote:
>> Google Beta User wrote on 15/4/12 :
>>> I'd still rather they got 4th than Chelsea.
>> erm why?? Chelsea are a top side who have fallen on hard times. See
>> where they are in Europe? See where Spurs are?
>> Spurs are *perpetual pretenders* who, even at their best, are a
>> pathetic laughing stock. The more they aspire to greatness the more
>> they stay the same. Anybody could have told you today they would
>> play pretty football everywhere except where it matters and then
>> get picked off by Chelsea.
>> Good riddance. Mid-table rubbish is all they are and top of the
>> list of Man Utd poodles.
> Its ironic how spending money, winning nothing and finishing outside
> the top four now gets you an international job, when it used to get
> you the sack
Some ex-managers spent money, won nothing, finished mid-table and ended up unemployed, which is as it should be IMHO.
> Bofh explained :
>> On Apr 15, 8:06 pm, Pope Pompous XVIII
>> <popepompousxv...@popesnews.invalid> wrote:
>>> Google Beta User wrote on 15/4/12 :
>>>> I'd still rather they got 4th than Chelsea.
>>> erm why?? Chelsea are a top side who have fallen on hard times. See
>>> where they are in Europe? See where Spurs are?
>>> Spurs are *perpetual pretenders* who, even at their best, are a
>>> pathetic laughing stock. The more they aspire to greatness the more
>>> they stay the same. Anybody could have told you today they would
>>> play pretty football everywhere except where it matters and then
>>> get picked off by Chelsea.
>>> Good riddance. Mid-table rubbish is all they are and top of the
>>> list of Man Utd poodles.
>> Its ironic how spending money, winning nothing and finishing outside
>> the top four now gets you an international job, when it used to get
>> you the sack
> Some ex-managers spent money, won nothing, finished mid-table and ended up > unemployed, which is as it should be IMHO.
I think of one manager who has gone longer without winning anything in England than Harry. And he's unemployed, so you may be right.
> > On Apr 15, 8:06 pm, Pope Pompous XVIII
> > <popepompousxv...@popesnews.invalid> wrote:
> >> Google Beta User wrote on 15/4/12 :
> >>> I'd still rather they got 4th than Chelsea.
> >> erm why?? Chelsea are a top side who have fallen on hard times. See
> >> where they are in Europe? See where Spurs are?
> >> Spurs are *perpetual pretenders* who, even at their best, are a
> >> pathetic laughing stock. The more they aspire to greatness the more
> >> they stay the same. Anybody could have told you today they would
> >> play pretty football everywhere except where it matters and then
> >> get picked off by Chelsea.
> >> Good riddance. Mid-table rubbish is all they are and top of the
> >> list of Man Utd poodles.
> > Its ironic how spending money, winning nothing and finishing outside
> > the top four now gets you an international job, when it used to get
> > you the sack
> Some ex-managers spent money, won nothing, finished mid-table and
> ended up unemployed, which is as it should be IMHO.
Yeah, some managers spent money, won the European Cup, finished higher
than any other manager we've had in the PL, and walked out. The only
reason Rafa is unemployed is that he's not willing to compromise on
how he believes a football club to be managed.
<popepompousxv...@popesnews.invalid> wrote:
> It happens that WTH formulated :
> > Yeah, some managers spent money, won the European Cup, finished
> > higher than any other manager we've had in the PL
> When you have to resort to lies to make your case you've already
> lost the battle.
> Unless I'm very much mistaken Rafa did not finish higher than
> Houllier.
Oh, you mean by place number? Rafa's team finished higher than
Houllier's - the place number is the same, but the important point is
that the team did better. Good luck obfuscating that, 'liar.' - lol.
> On Apr 15, 8:19 pm, Pope Pompous XVIII
> <popepompousxv...@popesnews.invalid> wrote:
>> HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAA!!!
>> Anyone else remember YIDDO and his mates swarming all over usenet
>> around Christmas telling us how Spurs were now the top club in
>> London?
>> PMSL!!!
>> Haven't been seeing much of him lately have we??
>> HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAA
>> Spurs - the only football club in the top four who remain MTN
>> (Mid-Table Nobodies) PIMSL!!!
>> FAF!!!
> hehe shame...and it was all looking so rosey for them at one stage.... 3rd > in the League...above us...2-0 up at the Emirates....glad we could be the > ones that brought them down the earth with a thud...now London's other big > boys squashing them like real little spuddies :-)
Yes - it's just a shame Arsenal don't enjoy the same cosy
relationship with Spurs and Everton and Villa that Man Utd enjoy or
they'd be streets ahead of the rest. But at least they are ahead in
the honour stakes, with Man Utd lagging far behind.
Are you listening Ashley Young? What good is a title when you have
to cheat your way to the top?
I have to hand it to you, your excuses and paranoia are the most highly evolved of any of the regular posters. It may just be that you back teams that are bound to lose as a kind of punishment for your 'sins'.
A few extra hail Mary's and a realisation, after 20 years of denial, that United are actually the best team in England, would do you the world of good.
> > On Apr 15, 8:06 pm, Pope Pompous XVIII
> > <popepompousxv...@popesnews.invalid> wrote:
> >> Google Beta User wrote on 15/4/12 :
> >>> I'd still rather they got 4th than Chelsea.
> >> erm why?? Chelsea are a top side who have fallen on hard times. See
> >> where they are in Europe? See where Spurs are?
> >> Spurs are *perpetual pretenders* who, even at their best, are a
> >> pathetic laughing stock. The more they aspire to greatness the more
> >> they stay the same. Anybody could have told you today they would
> >> play pretty football everywhere except where it matters and then
> >> get picked off by Chelsea.
> >> Good riddance. Mid-table rubbish is all they are and top of the
> >> list of Man Utd poodles.
> > Its ironic how spending money, winning nothing and finishing outside
> > the top four now gets you an international job, when it used to get
> > you the sack
> Some ex-managers spent money, won nothing, finished mid-table and
> ended up unemployed, which is as it should be IMHO.
>Yeah, some managers spent money, won the European Cup, finished higher
>than any other manager we've had in the PL, and walked out. The only
>reason Rafa is unemployed is that he's not willing to compromise on
>how he believes a football club to be managed.
Or it could be that no club will employ a manager with such a track record for falling out with the board once the money dries up and they have the nerve to ask him to actually do what he's paid to do with the hundreds of millions of quids worth of players they've already paid for.
> > > On Apr 15, 8:06 pm, Pope Pompous XVIII
> > > <popepompousxv...@popesnews.invalid> wrote:
> > >> Google Beta User wrote on 15/4/12 :
> > >>> I'd still rather they got 4th than Chelsea.
> > >> erm why?? Chelsea are a top side who have fallen on hard times. See
> > >> where they are in Europe? See where Spurs are?
> > >> Spurs are *perpetual pretenders* who, even at their best, are a
> > >> pathetic laughing stock. The more they aspire to greatness the more
> > >> they stay the same. Anybody could have told you today they would
> > >> play pretty football everywhere except where it matters and then
> > >> get picked off by Chelsea.
> > >> Good riddance. Mid-table rubbish is all they are and top of the
> > >> list of Man Utd poodles.
> > > Its ironic how spending money, winning nothing and finishing outside
> > > the top four now gets you an international job, when it used to get
> > > you the sack
> > Some ex-managers spent money, won nothing, finished mid-table and
> > ended up unemployed, which is as it should be IMHO.
> >Yeah, some managers spent money, won the European Cup, finished higher
> >than any other manager we've had in the PL, and walked out. The only
> >reason Rafa is unemployed is that he's not willing to compromise on
> >how he believes a football club to be managed.
> Or it could be that no club will employ a manager with such a track record
> for falling out with the board once the money dries up and they have the
> nerve to ask him to actually do what he's paid to do with the hundreds of
> millions of quids worth of players they've already paid for.
Ignoring the obvious biased interpretation of what happened
(especially the impression you are giving that he spent hundreds of
millions of pounds without having to generate any of that money,) that
may be correct.
Rafa is an excellent manager of a team and its tactics. He is very
demanding of his players, and he is similarly demanding of his
employers. That doesn't work out very well usually. He is simply an
uncompromising man. I mean that in both the positive and negative
ways.
He has been unequivocally successful in his managerial career.
<sc...@executivemail.co.za> wrote:
>On Apr 15, 8:19 pm, Pope Pompous XVIII
><popepompousxv...@popesnews.invalid> wrote:
>> HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAA!!!
>> Anyone else remember YIDDO and his mates swarming all over usenet
>> around Christmas telling us how Spurs were now the top club in
>> London?
>> PMSL!!!
>> Haven't been seeing much of him lately have we??
>> HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAA
>> Spurs - the only football club in the top four who remain MTN
>> (Mid-Table Nobodies) PIMSL!!!
>> FAF!!!
>hehe shame...and it was all looking so rosey for them at one stage....
>3rd in the League...above us...2-0 up at the Emirates....glad we could
>be the ones that brought them down the earth with a thud...now
>London's other big boys squashing them like real little spuddies :-)
Arsenal 1 - Wigan 2
ROTFLMAO!
Actually when you have already had this season QPR 2-1 Arse,
Sunderland 2- 0 Arse, Swansea 3 - 2 Arse, Fulham 2 - 1 Arse, Blackburn
4 - 3 Arse, Spurs 2 - 1 Arse and Manure 8 - 2 Arse we should not be
surprised at the Gonner capitulation should we, LOL!
At least 6 of the 8 Spurs losses this year have come against teams in
the top 7...
(oh and by the way, Arse 10 losses in the league, Spurs 8, Chelsea 8,
and you are only just ahead of Fulham 12, hardly the invincibles this
season!) -
XBox 360 GT: Broton69
-- ButIstillneedtoknowwhat'sinthere! Thekeytoanysecurity
systemishowit'sdesigned! Thatdependsonwhyitwasdesigned! Ihavetoknowwhatwhoeverdesigneditwastryingtoprotect!
(Blakes 7, City on the Edge of the World - Vila in typical panic mode)
> <sc...@executivemail.co.za> wrote:
> >On Apr 15, 8:19 pm, Pope Pompous XVIII
> ><popepompousxv...@popesnews.invalid> wrote:
> >> HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAA!!!
> >> Anyone else remember YIDDO and his mates swarming all over usenet
> >> around Christmas telling us how Spurs were now the top club in
> >> London?
> >> PMSL!!!
> >> Haven't been seeing much of him lately have we??
> >> HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAA
> >> Spurs - the only football club in the top four who remain MTN
> >> (Mid-Table Nobodies) PIMSL!!!
> >> FAF!!!
> >hehe shame...and it was all looking so rosey for them at one stage....
> >3rd in the League...above us...2-0 up at the Emirates....glad we could
> >be the ones that brought them down the earth with a thud...now
> >London's other big boys squashing them like real little spuddies :-)
> Arsenal 1 - Wigan 2
> ROTFLMAO!
> Actually when you have already had this season QPR 2-1 Arse,
> Sunderland 2- 0 Arse, Swansea 3 - 2 Arse, Fulham 2 - 1 Arse, Blackburn
> 4 - 3 Arse, Spurs 2 - 1 Arse and Manure 8 - 2 Arse we should not be
> surprised at the Gonner capitulation should we, LOL!
> At least 6 of the 8 Spurs losses this year have come against teams in
> the top 7...
> (oh and by the way, Arse 10 losses in the league, Spurs 8, Chelsea 8,
> and you are only just ahead of Fulham 12, hardly the invincibles this
> season!)
Great time-consuming investigations there...now just look at the
table.
Will it be Chelsea or Newcastle who kicks you out the top 4?
> In article <fcfc920c-3731-4dc4-9dbe-
> 0c7ba4f60...@h9g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, sc...@executivemail.co.za
> says...
> > On Apr 15, 8:19 pm, Pope Pompous XVIII
> > <popepompousxv...@popesnews.invalid> wrote:
> > > HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAA!!!
> > > Anyone else remember YIDDO and his mates swarming all over usenet
> > > around Christmas telling us how Spurs were now the top club in
> > > London?
> > > PMSL!!!
> > > Haven't been seeing much of him lately have we??
> > > HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAA
> > > Spurs - the only football club in the top four who remain MTN
> > > (Mid-Table Nobodies) PIMSL!!!
> > > FAF!!!
> > hehe shame...and it all looked so rosey for them at one stage....3rd
> > in the League....2-0 up at the Emirates.....
> > Chelsea squashing em like real lil spuddies now
> On Apr 16, 1:55 pm, Pope Pompous XVIII
> <popepompousxv...@popesnews.invalid> wrote:
>> It happens that WTH formulated :
>>> Yeah, some managers spent money, won the European Cup, finished
>>> higher than any other manager we've had in the PL
>> When you have to resort to lies to make your case you've already
>> lost the battle.
>> Unless I'm very much mistaken Rafa did not finish higher than
>> Houllier.
> Oh, you mean by place number? Rafa's team finished higher than
> Houllier's - the place number is the same, but the important point is
> that the team did better. Good luck obfuscating that, 'liar.' - lol.
<popepompousxv...@popesnews.invalid> wrote:
> WTH laid this down on his screen :
> > On Apr 16, 1:55 pm, Pope Pompous XVIII
> > <popepompousxv...@popesnews.invalid> wrote:
> >> It happens that WTH formulated :
> >>> Yeah, some managers spent money, won the European Cup, finished
> >>> higher than any other manager we've had in the PL
> >> When you have to resort to lies to make your case you've already
> >> lost the battle.
> >> Unless I'm very much mistaken Rafa did not finish higher than
> >> Houllier.
> > Oh, you mean by place number? Rafa's team finished higher than
> > Houllier's - the place number is the same, but the important point is
> > that the team did better. Good luck obfuscating that, 'liar.' - lol.
> Pathetic.
I don't think you're pathetic Pope, just really lonely...
: (oh and by the way, Arse 10 losses in the league, Spurs 8, Chelsea 8,
: and you are only just ahead of Fulham 12, hardly the invincibles this
: season!)
...and yet, still above you.
-- "Look at the way teams play against Arsenal. They don't believe they can win. They don't believe." -- Jose Mourinho
