Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Trade

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Amish

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 9:03:26 AM1/4/10
to
I still think a trade is coming

FlyersFanBoy

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 10:48:08 AM1/4/10
to
On Jan 4, 9:03 am, "Amish" <am...@home.net> wrote:
> I still think a trade is coming

I agree
Ross. Pyorala and Leighton to Montreal for draft picks

Luke

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 11:00:18 AM1/4/10
to

"Amish" <am...@home.net> wrote in message
news:a4661$4b41f539$d07bbdf6$11...@ALLTEL.NET...

>I still think a trade is coming
>
Maybe, but the Flyers are dealing from such a position of weakness that it
will be tough to do anything drastic. They don't have any good minor league
players nor do they have much in the way of draft picks and the only players
they would like to move have no-trade or restrictive trade clauses in their
contracts. Homer has painted himself into a very deep, dark corner and he
just better hope that they get this thing turned around and the players
start to play up to their abilities. Although I still think they could use
a veteran winger (Owen Nolan-type?), the fact is that there is enough
talent - when they are all healthy - on the team for them to at least eek
into the playoffs. The elephant in the room is goaltending. Emery has to
recover and regain starters form. As good as Boucher and Leighton have
played, they are career backups for a reason and it is too much to expect
them to provide above average goaltending for a team that needs better than
that to succeed.


Pelle Schultz

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 1:12:14 PM1/4/10
to

If there is a trade, it will be spare parts for a depth defenseman.

Pelle

Leon Neon

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 1:37:19 PM1/4/10
to
On Jan 4, 11:00 am, "Luke" <rluk...@comcast.net> wrote:

I don't think it's time yet to pack it in, and regroup for next year.

Draft picks; I'd like to think Homer knew what he was doing and the
upcoming draft is weak (I can't confirm that it is weak).

On the Farm; currently most in the system are struggling like the
team. Hopefully, a few of these guys can turn it around and get
better over the long term.


Parent Injury; This hurts the weak defensive depth. I kind-of wished
we kept Alberts. Homer has done a good job of finding 5-7th
defenseman types (for cheap).

Goaltending; We should have kept Niity to ride the bench. Bouch
sucks, always has. The team Homer has built is good, but the weak
link is the goalie. Homer did a great job with nothing and got
Emery. Emery had been playing well, no one could guess that he'd get
hurt. I'd be willing to play this out with Emery and see how he
responds after he gets back. If this season ends bad... Sign the
best UFA or Trade for the best goalie available. I never understood -
they traded what they did for Pronger who gets 20+ minutes. But,
skimp on the Goalie who's the last line of defense and out there the
whole game.

If No Playoffs looks likely: I'd consider trading just about anyone
accept Richards, Carter, Giroux, and JVR. Trade for youth, picks, and
to drop salary (for more wiggle room this summer and next year). A
playoff team might be interested in our "untradeables", like Briere.

If Playoffs look likely... Pick up a Veteran Winger; Satan was just
signed for 700K. Talk Shannahan out of retirement (but, I think we'd
need to trade for his rights). Forsburg? - if he looks good during
the Olympics and we are playoff bound... I'd sign him.

FlyersFanBoy

unread,
Jan 4, 2010, 2:17:48 PM1/4/10
to
On Jan 4, 9:03 am, "Amish" <am...@home.net> wrote:
> I still think a trade is coming

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pXI8LkeFWk

Anton

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 2:52:11 AM1/7/10
to
FlyersFanBoy kirjoitti:

Why would Gainey want to do this? They certainly don't need a 3rd string
backup goaltender when both of their goalies are better than Emery.

--
Anton

Pelle Schultz

unread,
Jan 7, 2010, 12:38:56 PM1/7/10
to

As demonstrated by the deep playoff runs both Halak and Price have
backstopped...

Pelle

Anton

unread,
Jan 8, 2010, 5:15:31 PM1/8/10
to
Pelle Schultz kirjoitti:

LOL! Both MTL goalies have better SV%'s and GGA's than Emery. On a
weaker team than than the Ottawa team where Emery has played most of his
career, may I say. They are also both younger (22 and 24) and have
cap-friendly contracts. How on earth does it make sense for MTL to trade
for a Flyers' backup? Montreal's weakness is scoring, not in goal.

I'm not saying either one is a Vezina candidate or anything, but right
now both have slightly better stats than the Flyers' #1 and there is a
healthy competition for the #1 job of their team. The only scenario that
makes sense for moving one of them in their current situation has to
involve a quality offensive forward coming their way.

--
Anton

Rick Y

unread,
Jan 8, 2010, 8:04:15 PM1/8/10
to
Anton <anton....@gmail.com> wrote in
news:hi8apa$4mf$1...@news.eternal-september.org:

> Pelle Schultz kirjoitti:
>> On Jan 7, 2:52 am, Anton <anton.use...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> FlyersFanBoy kirjoitti:
>>>
>>>> On Jan 4, 9:03 am, "Amish" <am...@home.net> wrote:
>>>>> I still think a trade is coming
>>>> I agree
>>>> Ross. Pyorala and Leighton to Montreal for draft picks
>
>>> Why would Gainey want to do this? They certainly don't need a 3rd
>>> string backup goaltender when both of their goalies are better than
>>> Emery.
>
>> As demonstrated by the deep playoff runs both Halak and Price have
>> backstopped...
>>
>> Pelle
>
> LOL! Both MTL goalies have better SV%'s and GGA's than Emery. On a
> weaker team than than the Ottawa team where Emery has played most of
> his career, may I say. They are also both younger (22 and 24) and have
> cap-friendly contracts. How on earth does it make sense for MTL to
> trade for a Flyers' backup? Montreal's weakness is scoring, not in
> goal.

It makes sense for Montreal to take Briere's contract, to <cough> add their
offensive depth.

> I'm not saying either one is a Vezina candidate or anything, but right
> now both have slightly better stats than the Flyers' #1 and there is a
> healthy competition for the #1 job of their team. The only scenario
> that makes sense for moving one of them in their current situation has
> to involve a quality offensive forward coming their way.

Briere Reeks of quality, he's offensive, *and* he's french Canadian.

Rick

Anton

unread,
Jan 9, 2010, 4:05:47 AM1/9/10
to
Rick Y kirjoitti:

> It makes sense for Montreal to take Briere's contract, to <cough> add their
> offensive depth.

:D

> Briere Reeks of quality, he's offensive, *and* he's french Canadian.
>
> Rick

Sure. A straight swap <cough> for Gomez would benefit both teams. The
French Canadian goes to Montreal and the US American to Philly.

--
Anton

0 new messages