So I heard on the audio feed that Ulanov was benched after his
great pass in the first period. True/untrue? If it is true,
perhaps it's a sign that Low will bench people who screw up
consistently (unless the person's name is MEssier).
Did anyone watching MSGN or at HSBC get to see Ulanov's reaction
to said benching?
Interesting that the ESPN summary on their website makes no
mention of his gaffe, even after they made a big deal of it
on the 1am ET SportsCenter. (I think they get their story from
AP, but still.)
Carolina tonight, eh? How much time will Ulanov see tonight?
- --keith
- --
kke...@speakeasy.net
public key: http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/kkeller/public_key
alt.os.linux.slackware FAQ: http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/perl/fom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjwFMtYACgkQhVcNCxZ5ID/0DwCeNrNMhthDnXj2EJkXIQlreOvk
wg0An3HbtZIvJWKAhwX4oS+sF+aAOthU
=hLa2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
In article <psb3u9...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us>,
kke...@speakeasy.net (Keith Keller) writes:
> Carolina tonight, eh? How much time will Ulanov see tonight?
Whoops! Tomorrow night. For some reason my schedule had this
game for tonight. *sheepish laugh* But I knew that was wrong,
really I did.
- --keith
- --
kke...@speakeasy.net
public key: http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/kkeller/public_key
alt.os.linux.slackware FAQ: http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/perl/fom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjwFNQkACgkQhVcNCxZ5ID9AcACfdmd0qNDFSR9ffLnTXu5kl2k6
rfwAn2mRpmW3SRG7bL5Exnuzfv7LFD6X
=OR1G
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>So I heard on the audio feed that Ulanov was benched after his
>great pass in the first period. True/untrue?
Purinton took the normal place of Berard's partner the rest of the game ...
In the Village ....
I am not a number ... I am a free man !!!!
>So I heard on the audio feed that Ulanov was benched after his
>great pass in the first period. True/untrue?
True, and VERY deserved.
> If it is true,
>perhaps it's a sign that Low will bench people who screw up
>consistently (unless the person's name is MEssier).
Well, Ughhhlanov doesn't have that NY "can-do-no-wrong" halo that certain
players do have, most notably Mark Mercenarier.
>Did anyone watching MSGN or at HSBC get to see Ulanov's reaction
>to said benching?
They didn't show it. Hopefully he won't be on the bench for the rest of the
year. Send him to Hartford, let someone claim his sorry ass off waivers if we
are lucky.
Of course, it didn't help that Purinton followed up Ulanov's awful play with an
ill-advised elbow to Varada's face (luck he didn't get a double or major with
that piece of work).
*****
Russ NO WAR
"Our city will not negotiate with terrorists. Is there a city nearby that
will?" (Mayor "Diamond Joe Quimby, The Simpsons)
"Only the good die young" (dedicated to Christie Noel)
In article <XIaN7.179859$IR4.66...@news1.denver1.co.home.com>,
"That puck took a bad bounce on Ulanov, Sam."
- --keith
- --
kke...@speakeasy.net
public key: http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/kkeller/public_key
alt.os.linux.slackware FAQ: http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/perl/fom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjwFUfsACgkQhVcNCxZ5ID+XTQCfWqZfPlI27ozSGa7n7f7sxWp/
wLwAn0QGK8hs4IiluRyZBSHo5muHwh/s
=WZRk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
One of the perks of being up here in Buffalo is being able to listen to Rick
Jeanerette on a regular basis.
This man makes me laugh, hard. Such a homer, and he gets excited by
EVERYTHING. He'll start screaming after a good line change.
David (What do you need?)
Micro...@aol.com
>"That puck took a bad bounce on Ulanov, Sam."
Please tell me you are just making fun of JD, and he didn't really say that on
the MSG broadcast...
"Dave Bauer" <micro...@aol.comdom> wrote in message
news:20011128165228...@mb-ms.aol.com...
"Dave Bauer" <micro...@aol.comdom> wrote in message
news:20011128165228...@mb-ms.aol.com...
"Don Cardoza" <dcar...@rcn.com> wrote in message
news:9u47lf$iie$1...@bob.news.rcn.net...
I don't care what he is. If there's one kind of player that doesn't belong in
the NHL, it's a defenseman that makes bad plays.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> So I heard on the audio feed that Ulanov was benched after his
> great pass in the first period. True/untrue? If it is true,
> perhaps it's a sign that Low will bench people who screw up
> consistently (unless the person's name is MEssier).
>
> Did anyone watching MSGN or at HSBC get to see Ulanov's reaction
> to said benching?
>
I think this is a good sign. Low said something to the effect that he
had seen enough poor passing from Ulanov and he couldn't stand watching
it anymore.
We have 8 NHL caliber defensemen on the team (including Van Impe). So there
is no reason to tolerate sloppy or undisciplined play. Ulanov should be
sat until he gets his head into the game.
I didn't notice any reaction from Ulanov. They didn't show him on the
bench but they did show him walking from the bench to the locker room
with a deadpan expression.
--
John Bradley "I'm a realist. I always see the possibilities for
jjbr...@erols.com the worst event. At the same time, I'm maybe
so much of a realist that I'm quite optimistic.
What a paradox." --- Egil Olsen
> kke...@speakeasy.net (Keith Keller) writes:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > So I heard on the audio feed that Ulanov was benched after his
> > great pass in the first period. True/untrue? If it is true,
> > perhaps it's a sign that Low will bench people who screw up
> > consistently (unless the person's name is MEssier).
> >
> > Did anyone watching MSGN or at HSBC get to see Ulanov's reaction
> > to said benching?
> >
>
> I think this is a good sign. Low said something to the effect that he
> had seen enough poor passing from Ulanov and he couldn't stand watching
> it anymore.
They mentioned during the radio broadcast of the game that Low had
specifically told him never to make that particular play again.
It's bad enough to be told by the caoch not to make that play and then to
go ahead and do it anyway.
It's bad enough to make that play and give up a goal.
Put the two together and you've pretty much signed your own death warrent.
-- Cliff
"The wild monkeys are waiting on the road for the handout foods from
visitors. Monkeys get used to human, they don't run away when visitors
approach them. But they are wild monkey and dangerous, please do not get
close to them. "
>Ulanov makes some bad plays but he's a big nasty defenseman and we need that
>he
>has a big upside on this team
The problem is that he's an even bigger upside for the team we are playing
against.
Ughhhlanov is a waste of space most of the time...half-assed defense and passes
so ill-advised they would make Jeff Beukeboom cringe... At least Chris Tamer
would fight on a regular basis for the team if asked.
We have a surplus of defensemen...Kloucek can knock 'em on their asses, and if
we can keep Purinton's dirty streak in check, Ulanov is just that...a surplus
extra defenseman....let him hone his fundamentals for Hartford or some other
team and let us find someone else who is willing to do some nasty hitting for a
spot with the big team (there has got to be SOME defenseman who would sacrifice
the body to show he can cut it in the NHL).
I'm actually not adverse to giving LeFebvre another chance. It's a
whole new mix of players so we may as well see what he can do under these
circumstances. If he can contribute something then fuck the past. If
not, nothing lost in the trying.
-- Cliff
"The wild monkeys are waiting on the road for the handout foods from
visitors. Monkeys get used to human, they don't run away when visitors
approach them. But they are wild monkey and dangerous, please do not get
close to them. "
In article <Pine.BSI.4.05L.101112...@milk.sover.net>,
Clifford Seifer <clif...@sover.net> writes:
> Here's the frustrating thing though. We have this surplus of defensemen
Agreed...
> with incredible talent
Not so sure about this one, though. *Potential* talent, maybe.
> so why does the defence suck so bad?
Partly it's because we don't have many good defensive defensemen.
But, IMO, it's mostly because the forwards don't know how to play
defensively, and the defensemen are overburdened in their own
zone. They are improving in this area from last season, but that's
not saying much.
> I'm actually not adverse to giving LeFebvre another chance. It's a
> whole new mix of players so we may as well see what he can do under these
> circumstances. If he can contribute something then fuck the past. If
> not, nothing lost in the trying.
Hmm...I feel Lefebvre is a bit of a wimp, and think of him as
a small Ulanov. I would like to know why Van Impe isn't getting
more time at the expense of Ulanov--Low could scratch Ulanov
and see what Van Impe can do.
Hey, it could be worse--we could still have Quintal.
- --keith
- --
kke...@speakeasy.net
public key: http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/kkeller/public_key
alt.os.linux.slackware FAQ: http://wombat.san-francisco.ca.us/perl/fom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjwGtEQACgkQhVcNCxZ5ID935ACghAYGR7Q5c6U2pwY2ZDleed+b
gzwAniJDqOSOorhsI/rUAAaJHgTGXJrO
=CEjJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
PH
It does seem like it'd be worth giving Lefebvre another shot. He did
pretty well when with the Avalanche. He never did anything as
egregious as Ulanov's "assist" the other night, anyway.
-- Trou
---------------------------------------------------
"Today's game is brought to you by Otter Beer, in the original
long necked bottle! When you want a refreshing brew with a bite,
you Otter get a longneck!"