Gerry
unread,Jun 23, 2017, 7:07:42 AM6/23/17You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Sign in to report message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
This is about where I'd be at too. 4x$6M would be "fair", I believe. I thought Radulov looked like the team's best forward most nights, and certainly was in the playoffs, but at the end of the day he did only get 18 goals and 50 points. The numbers don't tell the whole story, but they also don't really prove his case.
I could maybe see $7M on a 3 year deal? Or I think in a past thread I suggested I might grudgingly go 6x$6M, but that's pretty tough to imagine.
And indeed, tax is huge here. In Quebec, on a $7M salary, he'd pay $3,708,365.98 in taxes. In Nashville or Florida or Texas (and I think Vegas) he'd pay basically $1M less than this. So the difference between $6M and $7M could be entirely covered by tax alone.
Anyway, if I'm his agent he almost certainly goes to market "just in case". It just takes one crazy GM out there to offer the full retirement deal of his first ask. And it's not like the Habs are very likely to just "move on" and take the next best guy on July 1st... because there is basically no one else. Many years you'd have to worry a little bit about being left standing when the music stopped and ending up blowing your chance. I don't think that's likely to happen this year, with such slim pickings. And then for Radulov, even if it did, the KHL can pay him more than even his first ask money, so he has built-in insurance.
l8r,
Gerry