Dallas has a much better won loss regular season record since the inception of these 2 teams in 1960. The Cowboys were a very good team within 8 years of inception, whereas it took the Patriots 4 decades to become "good" - and then only with the use of illegal taping that arrived to the Patriots at the same time that Bill Belichick did.
The Cowboys have also had a lot better accounting for themselves than the Patriots have in the post-season.
Even if you did give the whiners and the cheesers of the Patriots their wish, and include those tainted super bowl "wins" of the Bellicheat years, the Cowboys still lead 5-3*. Yeah, and that '*' goes along with the 3, as ALL of you here so well know. Any of the years that Bill Bellicheat has been with the Patriots that have included that illegal taping are tainted years, and that includes the 2007 season. Hopefully the Patriots can have the wherewithal to not succumb to the temptation (or is it need on their part) to cheat, starting afresh in 2008 so that their fans can feel comfortable and proud of their team again, before the greatest sports scandal since the 1950s, and caused by the NE Patriots raised its ugly head.
> Dallas has a much better won loss regular season record since the > inception of these 2 teams in 1960. The Cowboys were a very good team > within 8 years of inception, whereas it took the Patriots 4 decades to > become "good" - and then only with the use of illegal taping that > arrived to the Patriots at the same time that Bill Belichick did.
> The Cowboys have also had a lot better accounting for themselves than > the Patriots have in the post-season.
> Even if you did give the whiners and the cheesers of the Patriots > their wish, and include those tainted super bowl "wins" of the > Bellicheat years, the Cowboys still lead 5-3*. Yeah, and that '*' > goes along with the 3, as ALL of you here so well know. Any of the > years that Bill Bellicheat has been with the Patriots that have > included that illegal taping are tainted years, and that includes the > 2007 season. Hopefully the Patriots can have the wherewithal to not > succumb to the temptation (or is it need on their part) to cheat, > starting afresh in 2008 so that their fans can feel comfortable and > proud of their team again, before the greatest sports scandal since > the 1950s, and caused by the NE Patriots raised its ugly head.
> And this we hope, in God's name... Amen!
You're kidding right?
You really think it was that big of a scandal?
That would figure. Patriot haters are everywhere, but that's only because The Pats have kicked their opponents collective ass for what some deem to be much too long, an eternity in fact, while others can't wait for the next Patriot title.
Me, I hope the roll continues, and further rankles football fans not wise to the ways of Patriot Nation and it's master, Bill Belichek!
> > Dallas has a much better won loss regular season record since the > > inception of these 2 teams in 1960. The Cowboys were a very good team > > within 8 years of inception, whereas it took the Patriots 4 decades to > > become "good" - and then only with the use of illegal taping that > > arrived to the Patriots at the same time that Bill Belichick did.
> > The Cowboys have also had a lot better accounting for themselves than > > the Patriots have in the post-season.
> > Even if you did give the whiners and the cheesers of the Patriots > > their wish, and include those tainted super bowl "wins" of the > > Bellicheat years, the Cowboys still lead 5-3*. Yeah, and that '*' > > goes along with the 3, as ALL of you here so well know. Any of the > > years that Bill Bellicheat has been with the Patriots that have > > included that illegal taping are tainted years, and that includes the > > 2007 season. Hopefully the Patriots can have the wherewithal to not > > succumb to the temptation (or is it need on their part) to cheat, > > starting afresh in 2008 so that their fans can feel comfortable and > > proud of their team again, before the greatest sports scandal since > > the 1950s, and caused by the NE Patriots raised its ugly head.
> > And this we hope, in God's name... Amen!
> You're kidding right?
> You really think it was that big of a scandal?
> That would figure. Patriot haters are everywhere, but that's only because > The Pats have kicked their opponents collective ass for what some deem to be > much too long, an eternity in fact, while others can't wait for the next > Patriot title.
> Me, I hope the roll continues, and further rankles football fans not wise to > the ways of Patriot Nation and it's master, Bill Belichek!
> Patriots Rule!!- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -
ummmmmm..... doctor o'bougie... you didn't address some of the original assertions... 1) about how much longer the cowboys have been than the patriots 2) the resulting far better record on the parts than the cowboys 3) that the cowboys never had a super bowl win tainted like the patriots have, because all the the patriot super bowl "wins" were while belichick has been there and they had been taping the whole time they had been under belichick until they got stone cold busted in the 1st regular season game of the 2007 year, against the jets, which means the 2000 thru 2007 years under belichick were all tainted.......
naw.... you chose not to try to answer any of those very valid, and yes, oh so very correct, assertions. leave it to a patriot fan like you though... we know how selective you guys can be.... how narrow your interpretations can be.....
> > Dallas has a much better won loss regular season record since the > > inception of these 2 teams in 1960. The Cowboys were a very good team > > within 8 years of inception, whereas it took the Patriots 4 decades to > > become "good" - and then only with the use of illegal taping that > > arrived to the Patriots at the same time that Bill Belichick did.
> > The Cowboys have also had a lot better accounting for themselves than > > the Patriots have in the post-season.
> > Even if you did give the whiners and the cheesers of the Patriots > > their wish, and include those tainted super bowl "wins" of the > > Bellicheat years, the Cowboys still lead 5-3*. Yeah, and that '*' > > goes along with the 3, as ALL of you here so well know. Any of the > > years that Bill Bellicheat has been with the Patriots that have > > included that illegal taping are tainted years, and that includes the > > 2007 season. Hopefully the Patriots can have the wherewithal to not > > succumb to the temptation (or is it need on their part) to cheat, > > starting afresh in 2008 so that their fans can feel comfortable and > > proud of their team again, before the greatest sports scandal since > > the 1950s, and caused by the NE Patriots raised its ugly head.
> > And this we hope, in God's name... Amen!
> You're kidding right?
> You really think it was that big of a scandal?
> That would figure. Patriot haters are everywhere, but that's only because > The Pats have kicked their opponents collective ass for what some deem to > be > much too long, an eternity in fact, while others can't wait for the next > Patriot title.
> Me, I hope the roll continues, and further rankles football fans not wise > to > the ways of Patriot Nation and it's master, Bill Belichek!
> Patriots Rule!!- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -
ummmmmm..... doctor o'bougie... you didn't address some of the original assertions... 1) about how much longer the cowboys have been than the patriots 2) the resulting far better record on the parts than the cowboys 3) that the cowboys never had a super bowl win tainted like the patriots have, because all the the patriot super bowl "wins" were while belichick has been there and they had been taping the whole time they had been under belichick until they got stone cold busted in the 1st regular season game of the 2007 year, against the jets, which means the 2000 thru 2007 years under belichick were all tainted.......
naw.... you chose not to try to answer any of those very valid, and yes, oh so very correct, assertions. leave it to a patriot fan like you though... we know how selective you guys can be.... how narrow your interpretations can be.....
I chose not to answer the repetitive drivel presented to a Patriots newsgroup. The same type of nonsense you attacked me with, because obviouly you have no life..
I guess for all you losers that hate the Pats it's the same old story, just a different day!
> > > Dallas has a much better won loss regular season record since the > > > inception of these 2 teams in 1960. The Cowboys were a very good team > > > within 8 years of inception, whereas it took the Patriots 4 decades to > > > become "good" - and then only with the use of illegal taping that > > > arrived to the Patriots at the same time that Bill Belichick did.
> > > The Cowboys have also had a lot better accounting for themselves than > > > the Patriots have in the post-season.
> > > Even if you did give the whiners and the cheesers of the Patriots > > > their wish, and include those tainted super bowl "wins" of the > > > Bellicheat years, the Cowboys still lead 5-3*. Yeah, and that '*' > > > goes along with the 3, as ALL of you here so well know. Any of the > > > years that Bill Bellicheat has been with the Patriots that have > > > included that illegal taping are tainted years, and that includes the > > > 2007 season. Hopefully the Patriots can have the wherewithal to not > > > succumb to the temptation (or is it need on their part) to cheat, > > > starting afresh in 2008 so that their fans can feel comfortable and > > > proud of their team again, before the greatest sports scandal since > > > the 1950s, and caused by the NE Patriots raised its ugly head.
> > > And this we hope, in God's name... Amen!
> > You're kidding right?
> > You really think it was that big of a scandal?
> > That would figure. Patriot haters are everywhere, but that's only because > > The Pats have kicked their opponents collective ass for what some deem to > > be > > much too long, an eternity in fact, while others can't wait for the next > > Patriot title.
> > Me, I hope the roll continues, and further rankles football fans not wise > > to > > the ways of Patriot Nation and it's master, Bill Belichek!
> > Patriots Rule!!- Hide quoted text -
> > - Show quoted text -
> ummmmmm..... doctor o'bougie... you didn't address some of the > original assertions... 1) about how much longer the cowboys have been > than the patriots 2) the resulting far better record on the parts than > the cowboys 3) that the cowboys never had a super bowl win tainted > like the patriots have, because all the the patriot super bowl "wins" > were while belichick has been there and they had been taping the whole > time they had been under belichick until they got stone cold busted in > the 1st regular season game of the 2007 year, against the jets, which > means the 2000 thru 2007 years under belichick were all > tainted.......
> naw.... you chose not to try to answer any of those very valid, and > yes, oh so very correct, assertions. leave it to a patriot fan like > you though... we know how selective you guys can be.... how narrow > your interpretations can be.....
> I chose not to answer the repetitive drivel presented to a Patriots > newsgroup. The same type of nonsense you attacked me with, because obviouly > you have no life..
> I guess for all you losers that hate the Pats it's the same old story, just > a different day!
oh, they are still going to be illegally taping? thanks for the heads up!
>were while belichick has been there and they had been taping the whole >time they had been under belichick until they got stone cold busted in >the 1st regular season game of the 2007 year, against the jets, which >means the 2000 thru 2007 years under belichick were all >tainted.......
Actually, it means the 2000 through 2006 wins were "tainted" by whatever was gained from illegal videotaping.
> >were while belichick has been there and they had been taping the whole > >time they had been under belichick until they got stone cold busted in > >the 1st regular season game of the 2007 year, against the jets, which > >means the 2000 thru 2007 years under belichick were all > >tainted.......
> Actually, it means the 2000 through 2006 wins were "tainted" by whatever was > gained from illegal videotaping.
which means that each and every year of their illegality (2000 to 2007) necessitates an asterisk. yes, it is true that they have not won any super bowls, because those "victories" were ill-begotten. the entire 2007 season was tainted by them FINALLY being caught in the first game of the 2007 regular season versus the Jets. sure, many Pats fans want to try to write if off, saying the Jets were not such a tough adversary anyway. if that truly WAS the case, then why would the Pats feel it necessary to illegally tape the Jets as they had been taping all of their adversaries since the arrival of the evil, fat, sinnin', lyin', double chinned Bill Belichick?
to FURTHER refine their illegal taping habits? why of course............
>> >were while belichick has been there and they had been taping the whole >> >time they had been under belichick until they got stone cold busted in >> >the 1st regular season game of the 2007 year, against the jets, which >> >means the 2000 thru 2007 years under belichick were all >> >tainted.......
>> Actually, it means the 2000 through 2006 wins were "tainted" by whatever >> was >> gained from illegal videotaping.
> which means that each and every year of their illegality (2000 to > 2007) necessitates an asterisk.
I think you misread my post. 2000 to 2006, not 2000 to 2007.
> yes, it is true that they have not > won any super bowls,
No, that's false.
> because those "victories" were ill-begotten.
No they weren't.
> the > entire 2007 season was tainted by them FINALLY being caught in the > first game of the 2007 regular season versus the Jets. sure, many > Pats fans want to try to write if off, saying the Jets were not such a > tough adversary anyway.
No, it's "written off" by virtue of the fact that they did not get the opportunity to use the tape in that game. So yes, they broke the rules in that game, but an advantage was not gained. "Asterisking" an entire season because of it makes no sense, except to those who realize that their favorite teams probably don't have a shot against the Patriots without looking for technicalities.
> if that truly WAS the case, then why would > the Pats feel it necessary to illegally tape the Jets as they had been > taping all of their adversaries since the arrival of the evil, fat, > sinnin', lyin', double chinned Bill Belichick?
> Dallas has a much better won loss regular season record since the > inception of these 2 teams in 1960. The Cowboys were a very good team > within 8 years of inception, whereas it took the Patriots 4 decades to > become "good" - and then only with the use of illegal taping that > arrived to the Patriots at the same time that Bill Belichick did.
> The Cowboys have also had a lot better accounting for themselves than > the Patriots have in the post-season.
> Even if you did give the whiners and the cheesers of the Patriots > their wish, and include those tainted super bowl "wins" of the > Bellicheat years, the Cowboys still lead 5-3*. Yeah, and that '*' > goes along with the 3, as ALL of you here so well know. Any of the > years that Bill Bellicheat has been with the Patriots that have > included that illegal taping are tainted years, and that includes the > 2007 season. Hopefully the Patriots can have the wherewithal to not > succumb to the temptation (or is it need on their part) to cheat, > starting afresh in 2008 so that their fans can feel comfortable and > proud of their team again, before the greatest sports scandal since > the 1950s, and caused by the NE Patriots raised its ugly head.
> And this we hope, in God's name... Amen!
Patriot's Nation EMBRACE THE HATE IN 08 Is that all you've got?
