info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Kittle
39 views
Skip to first unread message
cao
May 31, 2020, 9:24:43 PM5/31/20
to
What is he worth? Hint: they can't pay everyone top 10 money.
https://www.ninersnation.com/2020/5/30/21275360/49ers-silver-on-kittles-contract-situation-they-are-not-close-at-all
https://www.ninersnation.com/2020/5/30/21275360/49ers-silver-on-kittles-contract-situation-they-are-not-close-at-all
John Walsh
Jun 3, 2020, 5:07:26 PM6/3/20
to
On Sun, 31 May 2020 18:24:42 -0700 (PDT), cao <pobox...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>What is he worth? Hint: they can't pay everyone top 10 money.
>
>https://www.ninersnation.com/2020/5/30/21275360/49ers-silver-on-kittles-contract-situation-they-are-not-close-at-all
Every team faces that when they have success, when single players
stand out. Either they pay him, let him go or let other players go. He
holds the high ground with his performance in 2019.
wrote:
>What is he worth? Hint: they can't pay everyone top 10 money.
>
>https://www.ninersnation.com/2020/5/30/21275360/49ers-silver-on-kittles-contract-situation-they-are-not-close-at-all
stand out. Either they pay him, let him go or let other players go. He
holds the high ground with his performance in 2019.
cao
Jun 3, 2020, 10:41:53 PM6/3/20
to
Valuable guy for sure, with both ability and attitude. Pay inline with top TEs means they must free serious cap space. How to do that?
poldy
Jun 4, 2020, 2:35:05 PM6/4/20
to
stadiums this season.
49ers will have to resign Trent Williams, maybe Sherman, who may want a
big payday if the 49ers have another playoffs season.
cao
Jun 4, 2020, 6:27:35 PM6/4/20
to
Not to mention extend Fred Warner. Is Ford worth possibly losing Kittle, williams or Warner or anyone else to a reduced cap?
John Walsh
Jun 7, 2020, 6:38:59 AM6/7/20
to
On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 19:41:52 -0700 (PDT), cao <pobox...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>Valuable guy for sure, with both ability and attitude. Pay inline with top TEs means they must free serious cap space. How to do that?
Change some contracts if they can. That might be tight because they
did a lot of that last year. They've got $15,737,079 right now. I'm
pretty sure that this isn't enough.
wrote:
>Valuable guy for sure, with both ability and attitude. Pay inline with top TEs means they must free serious cap space. How to do that?
did a lot of that last year. They've got $15,737,079 right now. I'm
pretty sure that this isn't enough.
cao
Jun 14, 2020, 11:17:18 PM6/14/20
to
Having said all that, I love the guy, but, I wouldn't pay Kittle 20 mil (his reported demand). Too disruptive to future contracts.
John Walsh
Jun 18, 2020, 5:35:42 PM6/18/20
to
On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 20:17:17 -0700 (PDT), cao <pobox...@gmail.com>
fly much). It's not worth the money if he only shows up near the
second half of the season and the Niners would be smart to draft his
replacement.
wrote:
>On Sunday, June 7, 2020 at 3:38:59 AM UTC-7, John Walsh wrote:
>> On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 19:41:52 -0700 (PDT), cao <pobox...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Valuable guy for sure, with both ability and attitude. Pay inline with top TEs means they must free serious cap space. How to do that?
>>
>> Change some contracts if they can. That might be tight because they
>> did a lot of that last year. They've got $15,737,079 right now. I'm
>> pretty sure that this isn't enough.
>
>They could save some money with trades and cuts...players they are paying big money who aren't performing, or players they just don't need anymore (their replacements are better and cheaper). Richburg, Coleman, and especially Pettis. Seriously look at Ford as well.
>Having said all that, I love the guy, but, I wouldn't pay Kittle 20 mil (his reported demand). Too disruptive to future contracts.
Ford's more of a hangar queen (a plane that looks great, but doesn't
>On Sunday, June 7, 2020 at 3:38:59 AM UTC-7, John Walsh wrote:
>> On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 19:41:52 -0700 (PDT), cao <pobox...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Valuable guy for sure, with both ability and attitude. Pay inline with top TEs means they must free serious cap space. How to do that?
>>
>> Change some contracts if they can. That might be tight because they
>> did a lot of that last year. They've got $15,737,079 right now. I'm
>> pretty sure that this isn't enough.
>
>They could save some money with trades and cuts...players they are paying big money who aren't performing, or players they just don't need anymore (their replacements are better and cheaper). Richburg, Coleman, and especially Pettis. Seriously look at Ford as well.
>Having said all that, I love the guy, but, I wouldn't pay Kittle 20 mil (his reported demand). Too disruptive to future contracts.
fly much). It's not worth the money if he only shows up near the
second half of the season and the Niners would be smart to draft his
replacement.
John Walsh
Jun 20, 2020, 12:16:38 PM6/20/20
to
coaches.
They signed a good looking tackle, so they've got some backup for
Williams. Sherm might want a big pay day, but he's likely to be
earning it somewhere else. He's got his stats and all, but he got
fleeced by the Chiefs in the SB. :)
The way the virus keeps spiking, it might come down to them playing in
empty stadiums. Good luck trying to get the fans to pay to watch the
games from home.
cao
Jun 20, 2020, 8:19:57 PM6/20/20
to
Pay for play NFL. Good idea.
Fans definitely WOULD pay to see games, but there are so many "buts" I doubt they could be overcome before the season. Maybe they could pipe in crowd noise to get the players enthused and trick the TV audience. :)
Fans definitely WOULD pay to see games, but there are so many "buts" I doubt they could be overcome before the season. Maybe they could pipe in crowd noise to get the players enthused and trick the TV audience. :)
John Walsh
Jun 24, 2020, 12:36:11 AM6/24/20
to
On Sat, 20 Jun 2020 17:19:56 -0700 (PDT), cao <pobox...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>Pay for play NFL. Good idea.
>Fans definitely WOULD pay to see games, but there are so many "buts" I doubt they could be overcome before the season. Maybe they could pipe in crowd noise to get the players enthused and trick the TV audience. :)
I hope somebody breaks into the feed and adds a laught track for the
Seachickens.
wrote:
>Pay for play NFL. Good idea.
>Fans definitely WOULD pay to see games, but there are so many "buts" I doubt they could be overcome before the season. Maybe they could pipe in crowd noise to get the players enthused and trick the TV audience. :)
Seachickens.
0 new messages