Odds are that no one will want him as a headcoach so therefore could
be a great long term asset (not a one and done Norv) if things work
out and if they don't you fire Nolan and Martz next year anyways!
As things stand now this team has nothing to lose as we are stuck with
Nolan and if he doesn't make a dramatic change he's gone.
Also, the Yorks maybe biding time waiting for a Cohwer to come out of
retirement in a year. If Nolan doesn't improve the team then they
fire him with one year left on his contract and can take a shot at
Cohwer.
Just a thought
Fugetaboutit! But should they try to interview Cam Cameron? Great success
as a coordinator who found himself over his head as Head Coach...hum, that
sounds familiar.
I don't think Miami's failures can necessarily be put on Cameron's
shoulders. He had shit for talent to work with.
--
Greg Lentz
>
Cameron's biggest problem was, he had nothing to work with in Miami.
That's hardly his fault with he has no QB, no good receivers, no
running game and an old defense. Blame the GM for that and the
signing of free agents that were no help to the team. Parcells did a
good job of starting the house cleaning in Miami, but I think he
missed by firing Cameron.
> Cameron's biggest problem was, he had nothing to work with in Miami.
> That's hardly his fault with he has no QB, no good receivers, no
> running game and an old defense. Blame the GM for that and the
> signing of free agents that were no help to the team. Parcells did a
> good job of starting the house cleaning in Miami, but I think he
> missed by firing Cameron.
Well some Dolphins fans are pissed he passed up Quinn to get Ginn, whom
they deride as merely a kickoff returner.
And Cameron supposedly was sure Beck was the best QB so that is why he
passed up Quinn but Beck didn't get into the game until towards the end
of the season and Beck didn't light it up.
So his talent evaluation abilities could be questioned.
Plus he didn't mold Rivers into anything.
Not sure if he worked with Brees tho.
Anyone care to lay odds that the smelly tuna will annoint himself HC
half-way through the 2008 season? He has the ego (and the body mass) to
pull it off.
>In article <q523o3d4h15mveb5s...@4ax.com>,
> JW <Jo...@clearwire.net> wrote:
>
>> Cameron's biggest problem was, he had nothing to work with in Miami.
>> That's hardly his fault with he has no QB, no good receivers, no
>> running game and an old defense. Blame the GM for that and the
>> signing of free agents that were no help to the team. Parcells did a
>> good job of starting the house cleaning in Miami, but I think he
>> missed by firing Cameron.
>
>Well some Dolphins fans are pissed he passed up Quinn to get Ginn, whom
>they deride as merely a kickoff returner.
That wasn't Cameron's call.
--
Greg Lentz
What makes you say that?
Stink
Unlike the 49ers, the Dolphins had a general manager.
--
Greg Lentz
OK, someone had the title. Did the GM make that decision or did someone else? New coaches do receive a "honeymoon"
time of adjustment.
Stink
> OK, someone had the title. Did the GM make that decision or did someone
> else? New coaches do receive a "honeymoon"
> time of adjustment.
Very few first-year head coaches get as much player control as Nolan
got. Obviously, it's rare that the GM won't work with the coach to pick
players, or will pick players that the coach doesn't want, but the
coaches who do get a lot of control in their first head-coaching job are
generally guys with some clout already.
Agreed, but a new head coach will get some deferment by the GM when he really wants a player.
deference not deferment. I am getting to old to be trusted with the <Enter> key.
G
LMAO at you trying to cover your ass.
--
Greg Lentz
How the hell did you read that into what I wrote? I was wondering if you had just assumed that Cameron didn't make that
decision because he was the HC and that it must have been made by the GM. What is the name of the GM that made that
decision? Or, is this just another one of those "facts" that you picked out of your ass and when examined proves to be
false?
Stink
Randy Mueller. Recently fired by Parcells and the guy who hired Cameron
in the first place. Hired June 2005.
>Or, is this just another one of those "facts" that you picked out of your ass and when examined proves to be
>false?
Examine away.
LMAO at you for not knowing what you were talking about.
--
Greg Lentz
So, would you care to share with us how you "divined" that Mueller made the decision? I know it may be hard for you but
it would be nice if you could actually answer this question.
Stink
PS - You must spend a lot of your alone time cheerfully, er blissfully?, laughing since you have just written that laugh
your ass off when you are confronted by someone not knowing wht they were talking about.
I am unable to find anything saying who made that decision. Were you just pulling stuff out of your ass... AGAIN?
>On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:09:23 -0800, Greg Lentz <nodam...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>>>Well some Dolphins fans are pissed he passed up Quinn to get Ginn, whom
>>>>>>>>>they deride as merely a kickoff returner.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>That wasn't Cameron's call.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>What makes you say that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Unlike the 49ers, the Dolphins had a general manager.
>>>>>
>>>>>OK, someone had the title. Did the GM make that decision or did someone else? New coaches do receive a "honeymoon"
>>>>>time of adjustment.
>>>>
>>>>LMAO at you trying to cover your ass.
>>>
>>>How the hell did you read that into what I wrote? I was wondering if you had just assumed that Cameron didn't make that
>>>decision because he was the HC and that it must have been made by the GM. What is the name of the GM that made that
>>>decision?
>>
>>Randy Mueller. Recently fired by Parcells and the guy who hired Cameron
>>in the first place. Hired June 2005.
LOL at no response to this.
>>>Or, is this just another one of those "facts" that you picked out of your ass and when examined proves to be
>>>false?
>>
>>Examine away.
>>
>>LMAO at you for not knowing what you were talking about.
>
>So, would you care to share with us how you "divined" that Mueller made the decision?
What do you think GM's do?
>I know it may be hard for you but it would be nice if you could actually answer this question.
I'm enjoying watching you squirm too much.
>PS - You must spend a lot of your alone time cheerfully, er blissfully?, laughing since you have just written that laugh
>your ass off when you are confronted by someone not knowing what they were talking about.
Since you think you are actually really smart (but aren't), I'm enjoying
watching you prove it to everybody. And laughing about it.
>I am unable to find anything saying who made that decision. Were you just pulling stuff out of your ass... AGAIN?
What do you think GM's do?
--
Greg Lentz
>On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:48:51 -0800, I can smell your brain <pu...@flop.net>
>wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:09:23 -0800, Greg Lentz <nodam...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>>Well some Dolphins fans are pissed he passed up Quinn to get Ginn, whom
>>>>>>>>>>they deride as merely a kickoff returner.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>That wasn't Cameron's call.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>What makes you say that?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Unlike the 49ers, the Dolphins had a general manager.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>OK, someone had the title. Did the GM make that decision or did someone else? New coaches do receive a "honeymoon"
>>>>>>time of adjustment.
>>>>>
>>>>>LMAO at you trying to cover your ass.
>>>>
>>>>How the hell did you read that into what I wrote? I was wondering if you had just assumed that Cameron didn't make that
>>>>decision because he was the HC and that it must have been made by the GM. What is the name of the GM that made that
>>>>decision?
>>>
>>>Randy Mueller. Recently fired by Parcells and the guy who hired Cameron
>>>in the first place. Hired June 2005.
>
>LOL at no response to this.
>
>>>>Or, is this just another one of those "facts" that you picked out of your ass and when examined proves to be
>>>>false?
>>>
>>>Examine away.
>>>
>>>LMAO at you for not knowing what you were talking about.
>>
>>So, would you care to share with us how you "divined" that Mueller made the decision?
>
>What do you think GM's do?
You really are a simpleton. You need to look beyond the "Complete Idiots Guide" series for some knowledge even though
you do fit the criteria listed in its name.
>>I know it may be hard for you but it would be nice if you could actually answer this question.
>
>I'm enjoying watching you squirm too much.
So in other words, you picked the answer out of your ass and are unable to answer the question because we all see that
you do not actually know anything about who made what decision. Do you remember who was the GM most of Walsh's first
tenure with the 49ers? Guess what, he had almost no input into which player was drafted. Perhaps you do not remember
all of those championshp seasons while Bill Walsh made all draft day dfecisions even while there was another man with
the title of GM.
Thanks for another of your rocket scientist moments, Putz.
>>PS - You must spend a lot of your alone time cheerfully, er blissfully?, laughing since you have just written that laugh
>>your ass off when you are confronted by someone not knowing what they were talking about.
>
>Since you think you are actually really smart (but aren't), I'm enjoying
>watching you prove it to everybody. And laughing about it.
Cmon Putz, what is the difference between 3 and 4? Cmon Putz, what is the difference between responsibility and title?
You are just too cute trying to be smart. Do you feed yourself or is that too dangerous for your microencephalic
existence? (use a dictionary.)
>>I am unable to find anything saying who made that decision. Were you just pulling stuff out of your ass... AGAIN?
>
>What do you think GM's do?
Fulfill the set of responsibilities which have been negotiated and that are listed in their employment contracts. And
what do YOU think GM's do?
Thanks, Gracie.
G
I couldn't have said it better myself, Putz.
Stink
Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!cycny01.gnilink.net!hwmnpeer01.lga!hwmnpeer01.ams!news.highwinds-media.com!feeder5.cambrium.nl!feeder6.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!sn-xt-ams-06!sn-xt-ams-05!sn-post-ams-01!sn-post-ams-02!sn-post-sjc-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: Gregg Luze <gr...@strutz.com>
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.sf-49ers
Subject: Re: Why Martz might work...
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:00:29 -0800
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <uejao3579nqjvb7p5...@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
>>
>>>>I am unable to find anything saying who made that decision. Were you just pulling stuff out of your ass... AGAIN?
>>>
>>>What do you think GM's do?
>>
>>Fulfill the set of responsibilities which have been negotiated and that are listed in their employment contracts. And
>>what do YOU think GM's do?
>>
>>Thanks, Gracie.
>>
>>G
>
>I couldn't have said it better myself, Putz.
Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!sn-xt-sjc-02!sn-xt-sjc-01!sn-post-sjc-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: I can smell your brain <pu...@flop.net>
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.sf-49ers
Subject: Re: Why Martz might work...
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:07:52 -0800
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <kpkao31v3qbp5fbmi...@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Responding to yourself to make a point. Good move there.
--
Greg Lentz
And you are a technology genius as well as a rocket scientist. Everyone that uses Forte Agent for usenet has the same
path because that is the path that Forte has contracted with to provide incoming and outgoing service. What a LMAO Putz
(or in your case maybe LAME-O is more appropriate.)
Stink
Header from my previous post in this thread:
Path:
border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.speakeasy.net!news.speakeasy.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 17:23:35 -0600
From: Greg Lentz <nodam...@speakeasy.net>
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.sf-49ers
Subject: Re: Why Martz might work...
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:23:33 -0800
Message-ID: <kflao3ppv87cn4ta1...@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 113
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
Note that this line isn't in my headers, even though I use Forte Agent
4.2/32/1118 as well.
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
It's tough for a guy to both get owned on his lack of football knowledge
and his lack of usenet knowledge in the same thread, but you did a
fabulous job here. Not that anybody with half a brain didn't already
realize that you were using two different ID's on this group, but it's
pretty funny watching you pretend that you aren't.
Dumbass.
--
Greg Lentz
>On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 15:23:33 -0800, Greg Lentz <nodam...@speakeasy.net> wrote:
[removed]
I learned that someone who thinks that everyone is against them it is usually referred to as being paranoid. Does
anyone know what the term is to describe someone who thinks that everyone that disagrees with them is the same person?
G
Yes I am dumb enough to assume that you had a clue about what the "Path:" information means. Now go back and look at
the whole path information that you have posted for the three posts that you have posted here. Do you see it yet? Do
you see that thefirst part of the path information on your most recent Path: line is exactly the same as the previous
two? OK, all our posts start out at the same server. Did you then notice that all 3 of the Path: lines change.
Apparently you and I are in nearly the same part of the country but that G has a lot more jumps to get to where he is.
Do you see it now?
Stop wasting my time with this kindergarten level stuff. I am not one that thinks it is fun to watch someone making
themself repeatedly look stupid. I would not want anyone to think I am bullying someone who hasn't gotten anything
right in any of his recent posts. I suggest that you get your mom or your dad to help you with your posts. If not them
then perhaps someone else at the home for the criminally clueless who has some understanding of Numbers, Reading,
Analysing...
Stink
This is possibly the worst job of an alter trying to deny his/her
alter ego I've ever seen on usenet, and I've seen a lot since the
early 90's !
Gregg, there's a lot more to it than just the header, you've been
busted, deal with it !
Putz leaves after being shown the obviousness of his mistake and then Putz-light tries the old, old, old, old strategy
of "The Big Lie." LMAO
Stink
>> >It's tough for a guy to both get owned on his lack of football knowledge
>> >and his lack of usenet knowledge in the same thread, but you did a
>> >fabulous job here. Not that anybody with half a brain didn't already
>> >realize that you were using two different ID's on this group, but it's
>> >pretty funny watching you pretend that you aren't.
>>
>> >Dumbass.
>
>This is possibly the worst job of an alter trying to deny his/her
>alter ego I've ever seen on usenet, and I've seen a lot since the
>early 90's !
>
>Gregg, there's a lot more to it than just the header, you've been
>busted, deal with it !
Yep, he's been owned, but as usual, he'll deny, deny, deny to the end.
--
Greg Lentz
So glad you showed back up. Now, please point out to me my error. Why is it that if there is some more information
that shows your feeble conclusion to be accurate you have not shared it with us all? You sure have been having trouble
getting anything correct recently.
Apparently you have not yet found any other members of "the house for the criminally clueless" to assist you in your
research. Now, why is it that the number of router hops for me is so different than the number for G? Our posts start
at the same place and are routed through different parts of the country. Gosh this is a mystery, isn't it, clueless.
Stink
Denial ain't just a river in Egypt.
How amazingly original. That is the problem with using the strategy of "The Big Lie." It falls apart when you are
shown to be unable to provide ANY factual information, just more assertions that also fail thefact test. Clueless is as
Clueless does, right Clueless?
Stink