Elections aren't the way the people control the Government. Elections are the
way the Government controls the people. Democracy? Can't we do better than
that?!
49ERS: BOSS OF THE BAY
Next 49er/Raiders match up: 2006
Walsh calls "BIG BACK" on the Dallas one for the TD and the lead!
Wersching good on the PAT to push the lead to four! :)
Looks like Walt Easley had as much trouble holding on to the ball in
1981 as current Niners do today.
Walt was rumored to have some issues with coke.
If anyone has a video, I'm interested.
Leonard
What the fuck does that have to do with fucking politics, you git?
So did Ramson, but they got better.
If you get the channel both the 81 NFC Championship and the half hour
highlights of the 88 team are repeated from midnight to 2 a.m. tonight.
If not, I'll tape it.
They had another on mid-day about the 1998 NFC playoff "win" over the
Packers on ESPN2. You know, the game where Rice fumbled to end the
game, but the officials gave the 49ers the ball back anyway?
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!
- Gary Rosen
I must have confused it with the Washington Redskins playoff "win" in 1983
where they called two bogus penalties.
Bad calls happen in football games. Even trolls like Sam understand this.
Greg Lentz
"Mystifies me why people are so ridiculously moronic."
- T0n4w4d4 K4rd3x
No, we don't. Why don't you tell us about it?
I'd also love to see the game where TO danced on the pentagram again.
Speaking of crying like a baby, seems you guys are STILL doing it......
Aren't Niner-haters amazing? Here we are, 1-7, going nowhere, you'd think
they'd be satisfied, but they STILL can't stop crying about some game from 6
years ago.
I don't get ESPN Classics, and am very interested in a tape.
>
Oh the agony of being fixated on Jerry Rice. Feel the claws, Prometheus.
That's not as heart wrenching as watching Bill Parcells explain why
the kicker was the most productive players against the Bengals.
> Philip Sondericker <p.sond...@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:<BDB8117E.10B20A%p.sond...@comcast.net>...
> Uh, this is a thread about Niner glories from 20+ years ago.
>
> Care to revise your asinine statement, assface? :)
It was, until you mentioned the game from six years ago. The evidence
of which you were kind enough to leave in the thread. Thanks. Now,
what was that about statements and facial features?
> william lynch <x@y.z> wrote in message news:<BDB7B5C1.5E95%x@y.z>...
> Why? To remind you of better days?
>
> Isn't that what this whole thread is about anyway?
>
> Surprised you didn't call it the George W. Bush Pentagram while you were at
> it.
That wouldn't be accurate. W owned the Rangers, not the cows.
Only 3 points separate a loser like erickson from a HOF coach like Parcells
? Funny how with so much more talent on the playing and coaching end, the
'Boys can only do 3 points better.
>Greg Lentz <nodam...@speakeasy.net> wrote in message news:<osm4p05cu8vobt3cg...@4ax.com>...
>> On 10 Nov 2004 06:27:23 -0800, tonawan...@gmail.com (Tonawanda
>> Kardex) wrote:
>>
>> >william lynch <x@y.z> wrote in message news:<BDB6B5FD.5D93%x@y.z>...
>> >> For a 90-minute program on the 1981 NFC Championship game.
>> >> 6-7:30 pm Pacific.
>> >
>> >They had another on mid-day about the 1998 NFC playoff "win" over the
>> >Packers on ESPN2. You know, the game where Rice fumbled to end the
>> >game, but the officials gave the 49ers the ball back anyway?
>>
>> I must have confused it with the Washington Redskins playoff "win" in 1983
>> where they called two bogus penalties.
>
>You mean the PI calls? FYI: they didn't directly change the outcome of
>the game.
OK, we can ignore the rest of this rant after that ludicrous statement.
They didn't. If the calls had gone the other way, would the game have been
immediately decided? No.
The statement is perfectly rational, and your inability to discuss it
rationally shows how wrong you are.
Nice try.
--
"Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your
country."
"America! F**k, yeah!"
My "evidence" was simply an acknowledgement there were other TV programs
dedicated to past 49er glories, which was perfectly in-line with the
original post.
Point taken, but that was hardly *my* point.
> Yeesh. You think that's pretty funny but it's a display of idiocy. Is
> Todd Peterson more productive than Eric Johnson? By your moronic
> logic, he is. In fact, he's more productive than Johnson, Cedrick
> Wilson and Brandon Lloyd, combined. By your moronic logic.
Did someone else get those 3 points, or what?
> Greg Lentz <nodam...@speakeasy.net> wrote in message
> news:<osm4p05cu8vobt3cg...@4ax.com>...
>> On 10 Nov 2004 06:27:23 -0800, tonawan...@gmail.com (Tonawanda
>> Kardex) wrote:
>>
>>> william lynch <x@y.z> wrote in message news:<BDB6B5FD.5D93%x@y.z>...
>>>> For a 90-minute program on the 1981 NFC Championship game.
>>>> 6-7:30 pm Pacific.
>>>
>>> They had another on mid-day about the 1998 NFC playoff "win" over the
>>> Packers on ESPN2. You know, the game where Rice fumbled to end the
>>> game, but the officials gave the 49ers the ball back anyway?
>>
>> I must have confused it with the Washington Redskins playoff "win" in 1983
>> where they called two bogus penalties.
>
> You mean the PI calls? FYI: they didn't directly change the outcome of
> the game. If the "right" calls had been made, the game wouldn't have
> been over. BIG difference.
Huh? Those PI calls occurred on the final drive of the game. They got the
Redskins into field goal range. What the hell are you babbling about?
> Philip Sondericker <p.sond...@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:<BDB8117E.10B20A%p.sond...@comcast.net>...
>> Aren't Niner-haters amazing? Here we are, 1-7, going nowhere, you'd think
>> they'd be satisfied, but they STILL can't stop crying about some game from 6
>> years ago.
>
>
> Uh, this is a thread about Niner glories from 20+ years ago.
>
> Care to revise your asinine statement, assface? :)
Uh, someone deliberately changed the topic from 20+ years ago to 6 years
ago. Care to issue a retraction?
I explained this to the other simpleton in the thread already. Find it and
learn something!
Deliberately? Hardly.
It was just bait, which y'all ate up like you was starvin'!
:D
> On 11/11/04 7:15 PM, in article BDB96A7D.10B45B%p.sond...@comcast.net,
> "Philip Sondericker" <p.sond...@comcast.net> was aligned with John Kerry
> when s/he said:
>
>> in article fe153c9f.04111...@posting.google.com, Tonawanda Kardex
>> at tonawan...@gmail.com wrote on 11/11/04 11:08 AM:
>>
>>> Philip Sondericker <p.sond...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>> news:<BDB8117E.10B20A%p.sond...@comcast.net>...
>>
>>>> Aren't Niner-haters amazing? Here we are, 1-7, going nowhere, you'd think
>>>> they'd be satisfied, but they STILL can't stop crying about some game from
>>>> 6
>>>> years ago.
>>>
>>>
>>> Uh, this is a thread about Niner glories from 20+ years ago.
>>>
>>> Care to revise your asinine statement, assface? :)
>>
>> Uh, someone deliberately changed the topic from 20+ years ago to 6 years
>> ago. Care to issue a retraction?
>
> Deliberately? Hardly.
You don't control what you write?
> It was just bait, which y'all ate up like you was starvin'!
>
> :D
Translation: caught in another lie.
> On 11/11/04 7:17 PM, in article BDB96AE7.10B45C%p.sond...@comcast.net,
> "Philip Sondericker" <p.sond...@comcast.net> was aligned with John Kerry
> when s/he said:
>
>> in article fe153c9f.04111...@posting.google.com, Tonawanda Kardex
>> at tonawan...@gmail.com wrote on 11/11/04 11:10 AM:
>>
>>> Greg Lentz <nodam...@speakeasy.net> wrote in message
>>> news:<osm4p05cu8vobt3cg...@4ax.com>...
>>>> On 10 Nov 2004 06:27:23 -0800, tonawan...@gmail.com (Tonawanda
>>>> Kardex) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> william lynch <x@y.z> wrote in message news:<BDB6B5FD.5D93%x@y.z>...
>>>>>> For a 90-minute program on the 1981 NFC Championship game.
>>>>>> 6-7:30 pm Pacific.
>>>>>
>>>>> They had another on mid-day about the 1998 NFC playoff "win" over the
>>>>> Packers on ESPN2. You know, the game where Rice fumbled to end the
>>>>> game, but the officials gave the 49ers the ball back anyway?
>>>>
>>>> I must have confused it with the Washington Redskins playoff "win" in 1983
>>>> where they called two bogus penalties.
>>>
>>> You mean the PI calls? FYI: they didn't directly change the outcome of
>>> the game. If the "right" calls had been made, the game wouldn't have
>>> been over. BIG difference.
>>
>> Huh? Those PI calls occurred on the final drive of the game. They got the
>> Redskins into field goal range. What the hell are you babbling about?
>
> I explained
You mis-spelled "backpeddled".
> in article BDB96B96.13B48%tktkt...@stanfordsucks.edu, Tonawanda Kardex at
> tktkt...@stanfordsucks.edu wrote on 11/11/04 7:18 PM:
>
>> On 11/11/04 7:15 PM, in article BDB96A7D.10B45B%p.sond...@comcast.net,
>> "Philip Sondericker" <p.sond...@comcast.net> was aligned with John Kerry
>> when s/he said:
>>
>>> in article fe153c9f.04111...@posting.google.com, Tonawanda Kardex
>>> at tonawan...@gmail.com wrote on 11/11/04 11:08 AM:
>>>
>>>> Philip Sondericker <p.sond...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:<BDB8117E.10B20A%p.sond...@comcast.net>...
>>>
>>>>> Aren't Niner-haters amazing? Here we are, 1-7, going nowhere, you'd think
>>>>> they'd be satisfied, but they STILL can't stop crying about some game from
>>>>> 6
>>>>> years ago.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Uh, this is a thread about Niner glories from 20+ years ago.
>>>>
>>>> Care to revise your asinine statement, assface? :)
>>>
>>> Uh, someone deliberately changed the topic from 20+ years ago to 6 years
>>> ago. Care to issue a retraction?
>>
>> Deliberately? Hardly.
>
> You don't control what you write?
>
>> It was just bait, which y'all ate up like you was starvin'!
>>
>> :D
>
> Translation: caught in another lie.
No, Phil, that's your Michael Moore impersonation. :)
No, I didn't. You once again demonstrate your inability to read or view
anything without personally attacking someone!
Surprise.
Nice try, and absolutely valid. You brought up the game from six
years ago, Philip responded, and you replied with name calling,
then have since lapsed into denial. It's all right there.
> On 11/11/04 11:56 AM, in article BDB903D0.5FE7%x@y.z, "william lynch"
Then in this case your point completely escapes me.
OK, you asked first, but Erasmus wanted a copy also. Who has tape
copying equipment?
Your explanation made no sense in English. Perhaps if you could
provide the original language?
When someone who isn't trolling shows up to discuss the point, I'll
discuss it with them. When it comes to your football biases, little more
need be done than to insult you or laugh at you.
Like I'm doing right now.
Nah, Spike's so far into denial, he's halfway to Egypt without a boat.
Not me..... :(
>
> in article BDB969CB.13A8A%tktkt...@stanfordsucks.edu, Tonawanda Kardex at
> tktkt...@stanfordsucks.edu wrote on 11/11/04 7:11 PM:
>> My "evidence" was simply an acknowledgement there were other TV programs
>> dedicated to past 49er glories, which was perfectly in-line with the
>> original post.
>>
>> Nice try.
>
> Nice try, and absolutely valid. You brought up the game from six
> years ago, Philip responded, and you replied with name calling,
> then have since lapsed into denial. It's all right there.
And to think this clown is so contemptuous of propagandists like Michael
Moore. He should consider working for Moore, he's actually quite good at it.
You should have said something! :) I had the recorder set for another
channel when I surfed into the ESPN Classics. I could have reset and
bagged the game.