Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Suspension Isn't Enough

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Hoover

unread,
Dec 14, 2010, 5:04:00 AM12/14/10
to
The Jets should have fired this loser on the spot.http://
sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdown_corner/post/NFL-suspends-Jets-coach-
rest-of-season-for-tripp?urn=nfl-295447

Ritchie

unread,
Dec 14, 2010, 6:17:04 AM12/14/10
to

I think the league should take it one step further, and ban him from
ever working in the NFL again. He could have caused a career ending
injury with his stupidity and carelessness. I believe the actions
warrant a ban from working in the NFL again.

Ray O'Hara

unread,
Dec 14, 2010, 9:31:35 AM12/14/10
to

"Ritchie" <ritch...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2e8a15ab-bb1d-4371...@z9g2000yqz.googlegroups.com...


================================================================================

and the NFL should kick his dog too.


deem...@aol.com

unread,
Dec 14, 2010, 10:10:49 AM12/14/10
to

agreed

sam

unread,
Dec 14, 2010, 10:27:54 AM12/14/10
to
In article <2e8a15ab-bb1d-4371-9a30-93e3a44307b6
@z9g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>, ritch...@gmail.com says...

He really stood up like a man, admitted he was wrong,
no excuses. That's got to count for something.

s

marcman

unread,
Dec 14, 2010, 10:31:33 AM12/14/10
to
On Dec 14, 6:17 am, Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com> wrote:

Disagree because he didn't actually injure somebody.

But the Jets should have let him go.

Dennis J

unread,
Dec 14, 2010, 10:43:08 AM12/14/10
to
hey, sam <sp...@nospam.spam>'s been through solid matter, for crying
out loud. Who knows what's happened to his brain? Maybe it's scrambled
his molecules...

yeah it saved his dignity... at least a little...
--

"It’s been so difficult to get out of this recession because of the disequilibrium in the real economy.”" -- Paul Volcker

"Education is the progressive discovery of our own Ignorance" Will Durant

"One can't have a sense of perspective without a sense of Humor" -- Wayne Thiboux

"the Glass is not only half full, it has been delicious so far!!" -- ME

To reply, SCRAPE off the end bits.

JKConey

unread,
Dec 14, 2010, 11:27:51 AM12/14/10
to
I'm not defending him at all but.... Vick is back playing, as well as
other various DUI's, and even murderers! That said, how do you not give a
low level working stiff another chance?


--

www.myconeyislandmemories.com

Harlan Lachman

unread,
Dec 14, 2010, 1:55:35 PM12/14/10
to
In article
<826d7403-0a56-4226...@v17g2000prc.googlegroups.com>,
marcman <marcman...@gmail.com> wrote:

Marcman, I don't understand why the fact that no one got hurt makes a
difference. He tripped someone of size and speed. Injury could have
resulted. What difference does circumstance having nothing to do with
the intention or action make?

I don't get it.

harlan

marcman

unread,
Dec 14, 2010, 2:11:51 PM12/14/10
to
On Dec 14, 1:55 pm, Harlan Lachman <har...@eeivt.com> wrote:
> In article
> <826d7403-0a56-4226-9415-72a8f2afb...@v17g2000prc.googlegroups.com>,

I'm not sure we can arbitrarily assign intent to the action. He
obviously tried to interfere, but we don't know if he intended to
injure. He admitting to interfering. Since this didn't happen in the
field of play amongst contestants, I'm kind of looking at it like a
crime. If you rob a store and nobody gets hurt, when you get caught
you get punished. But if you rob a store and somebody does get hurt,
when you get caught you get punished but more severely. I dunno, maybe
my thinking is off on this, but that's the way I see it right now. I'd
be more than happy to read others' opinions on that, especially yours,
Harlan.

RaginPage

unread,
Dec 14, 2010, 3:15:27 PM12/14/10
to
On Dec 14, 5:04 am, Hoover <Hoov_Hoo...@yahoo.com> wrote:

If he doesn't serve prison time for this, something is wrong with our
justice system.

I think 5-10 years might just make him think twice before thrusting
his knee out while he's standing 4 feet out of bounds. He should also
be banned from ever even watching an NFL game. He should have thought
about how much he loves the NFL BEFORE he acted like a complete thug.

Brent

The Undead Edward M. Kennedy

unread,
Dec 14, 2010, 3:24:19 PM12/14/10
to
"RaginPage" <btpag...@yahoo.com> wrote

I've wondered for years why athletes are allowed to fight with
assault charges only being filed in the rarest of cases.

--Tedward


Starcade

unread,
Dec 14, 2010, 4:19:10 PM12/14/10
to
On Dec 14, 3:17 am, Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think the league should take it one step further, and ban him from
> ever working in the NFL again. He could have caused a career ending
> injury with his stupidity and carelessness. I believe the actions
> warrant a ban from working in the NFL again.

Don't even let the fucker in the stadium ever again.

AND suspend Rex Ryan from the team for the rest of the season.

Mike

Ritchie

unread,
Dec 14, 2010, 4:23:17 PM12/14/10
to
On Dec 14, 10:27 am, sam <s...@nospam.spam> wrote:
> In article <2e8a15ab-bb1d-4371-9a30-93e3a44307b6
> @z9g2000yqz.googlegroups.com>, ritchie1...@gmail.com says...

>
>
>
> > On Dec 14, 5:04 am, Hoover <Hoov_Hoo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > The Jets should have fired this loser on the spot.http://
> > > sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdown_corner/post/NFL-suspends-Jets-coach-
> > > rest-of-season-for-tripp?urn=nfl-295447
>
> > I think the league should take it one step further, and ban him from
> > ever working in the NFL again. He could have caused a career ending
> > injury with his stupidity and carelessness. I believe the actions
> > warrant a ban from working in the NFL again.
>
> He really stood up like a man, admitted he was wrong,
> no excuses. That's got to count for something.
>
> s

I really dont think he had much of a choice, he was caught red handed.
Admitting he was wrong means absolutely nothing to me, he should be
banned. "He really stood up like a man" please, give me a break! A
real man wouldn't have done what he did.

Ritchie

unread,
Dec 14, 2010, 4:25:33 PM12/14/10
to
On Dec 14, 10:31 am, marcman <marcmanstud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 14, 6:17 am, Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com> wrote:> > I think the league should take it one step further, and ban him from

> > ever working in the NFL again. He could have caused a career ending
> > injury with his stupidity and carelessness. I believe the actions
> > warrant a ban from working in the NFL again.
>
> Disagree because he didn't actually injure somebody.
>
> But the Jets should have let him go.

That he didn't hurt anyone doesn't matter, the possibility was there
because of his stupidity. He should pay the ultimate price and be
banned for good because of his stupid and irresponsible action.

RaginPage

unread,
Dec 14, 2010, 4:31:32 PM12/14/10
to

Not just Rex Ryan, the rest of the team should be suspended as well.
They were coached by this loser, so they obviously have the same
problem. Get rid of those kinds of people.

Brent

RaginPage

unread,
Dec 14, 2010, 4:32:04 PM12/14/10
to


Again, prison time. You are letting him off too easy by just banning
him.

Brent

marcman

unread,
Dec 14, 2010, 4:36:02 PM12/14/10
to
On Dec 14, 4:25 pm, Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com> wrote:

I was thinking of you when I responded to Harlan. If you get a chance
please see my reply to him and offer commentary. Thanks.

RickyBobby

unread,
Dec 14, 2010, 5:27:18 PM12/14/10
to

"Hoover" wrote in message
news:9ee6bbba-abcf-49c6...@n10g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...

The Jets should have fired this loser on the spot.http://
sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdown_corner/post/NFL-suspends-Jets-coach-

rest-of-season-for-tripp?urn=nfl-295447T

The Jets, being the class act they are, will no doubt bring him back next
season. He is more effective than most of the Jets players at stopping his
man.


Starcade

unread,
Dec 14, 2010, 7:35:20 PM12/14/10
to
On Dec 14, 1:31 pm, RaginPage <btpage0...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Not just Rex Ryan, the rest of the team should be suspended as well.
> They were coached by this loser, so they obviously have the same
> problem.  Get rid of those kinds of people.

I certainly wouldn't have an issue with forfeitures of games for
extreme events such as this, but that violates the concept of the
league's sole existence as a business.

Mike

sam

unread,
Dec 14, 2010, 9:55:27 PM12/14/10
to
In article <c9614be1-5fc5-45a4-b7c3-3b6777f18bb7
@r16g2000prh.googlegroups.com>, ritch...@gmail.com says...

A lot of people start making excuses. He didn't.

s

Message has been deleted

Dale Hicks

unread,
Dec 15, 2010, 12:47:52 AM12/15/10
to
In article <18kgg6lssfe0nfquj...@4ax.com>,
gray...@invalid.invalid says...
> You have to understand where these sanctimonious prattlers are coming
> from. Obviously they have always worked in companies where an employee
> who does one stupid thing after a meritorious career is summarily fired
> and blacklisted for life.

Generally, one assault is considered to be a pretty big deal.

--
Cranial Crusader dgh 1138 at bell south point net

Ritchie

unread,
Dec 15, 2010, 2:10:42 AM12/15/10
to
On Dec 15, 12:36 am, graybeard <graybe...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:36:02 -0800 (PST) marcman
> You have to understand where these sanctimonious prattlers are coming
> from. Obviously they have always worked in companies where an employee
> who does one stupid thing after a meritorious career is summarily fired
> and blacklisted for life.
> --
> graybeard- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I dont believe in second chances when it comes to stupidity.

RaginPage

unread,
Dec 15, 2010, 6:38:31 AM12/15/10
to
On Dec 15, 12:47 am, Dale Hicks <a...@b.com> wrote:
> In article <18kgg6lssfe0nfqujls795st72ihshi...@4ax.com>,
> graybe...@invalid.invalid says...

>
>
>
>
>
> > On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:36:02 -0800 (PST) marcman
> > <marcmanstud...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >On Dec 14, 4:25 pm, Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> On Dec 14, 10:31 am, marcman <marcmanstud...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >> > On Dec 14, 6:17 am, Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com> wrote:> > I think the league should take it one step further, and ban him from
> > >> > > ever working in the NFL again. He could have caused a career ending
> > >> > > injury with his stupidity and carelessness. I believe the actions
> > >> > > warrant a ban from working in the NFL again.
>
> > >> > Disagree because he didn't actually injure somebody.
>
> > >> > But the Jets should have let him go.
>
> > >> That he didn't hurt anyone doesn't matter, the possibility was there
> > >> because of his stupidity. He should pay the ultimate price and be
> > >> banned for good because of his stupid and irresponsible action.
>
> > >I was thinking of you when I responded to Harlan. If you get a chance
> > >please see my reply to him and offer commentary. Thanks.
>
> > You have to understand where these sanctimonious prattlers are coming
> > from. Obviously they have always worked in companies where an employee
> > who does one stupid thing after a meritorious career is summarily fired
> > and blacklisted for life.
>
> Generally, one assault is considered to be a pretty big deal.
>

That's why you guys look like such morons. Someone standing still
sticking their knee out in no way, shape or form, would ever be
characterized as assault.

The guy was a jerk to do what he did, but I don't even see due cause
for punishment to be honest with you.

He wasn't on the field of play. If football players can get away with
body slamming someone into the ground by their facemask with only a
penalty called, there is no way some low-level coach should get any
kind of punishment for sticking his knee out 4 feet out of bounds.

It's kind of like thinking Vick deserved to be banned from the NFL
because he hurt dogs, but Leonard Little killed someone, but hey, he
can come back whenever he wants.

Ridiculous.

Brent

Ritchie

unread,
Dec 15, 2010, 7:48:42 AM12/15/10
to
On Dec 15, 6:38 am, RaginPage <btpage0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> That's why you guys look like such morons.  Someone standing still
> sticking their knee out in no way, shape or form, would ever be
> characterized as assault.

I guess you really don't know the law. You should study up on the law
and what can and cant be done before you comment on it. Charges of
assault can be brought up on anyone for the most simplest and innocent
of things.

> The guy was a jerk to do what he did, but I don't even see due cause
> for punishment to be honest with you.
>
> He wasn't on the field of play.  If football players can get away with
> body slamming someone into the ground by their facemask with only a
> penalty called, there is no way some low-level coach should get any
> kind of punishment for sticking his knee out 4 feet out of bounds.

He isn't a football player and was not on the field that's why he
deserves punishment. He had no business doing what he did. Try to
think with some intelligence, if possible.

> It's kind of like thinking Vick deserved to be banned from the NFL
> because he hurt dogs, but Leonard Little killed someone, but hey, he
> can come back whenever he wants.
>
> Ridiculous.

Both Vick and Little deserved to be banned for life. I just hope
someone catches Vick one day and snaps his neck. And yes I do mean
that literally.

RaginPage

unread,
Dec 15, 2010, 7:57:04 AM12/15/10
to
On Dec 15, 7:48 am, Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 15, 6:38 am, RaginPage <btpage0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > That's why you guys look like such morons.  Someone standing still
> > sticking their knee out in no way, shape or form, would ever be
> > characterized as assault.
>
> I guess you really don't know the law. You should study up on the law
> and what can and cant be done before you comment on it. Charges of
> assault can be brought up on anyone for the most simplest and innocent
> of things.

Of course they can be brought up. But they don't stick for idiotic
things like that. Perhaps you should consider what a judge might just
do to a DA that would waste the courts time with such a case.

> > The guy was a jerk to do what he did, but I don't even see due cause
> > for punishment to be honest with you.
>
> > He wasn't on the field of play.  If football players can get away with
> > body slamming someone into the ground by their facemask with only a
> > penalty called, there is no way some low-level coach should get any
> > kind of punishment for sticking his knee out 4 feet out of bounds.
>
> He isn't a football player and was not on the field that's why he
> deserves punishment. He had no business doing what he did. Try to
> think with some intelligence, if possible.

That makes no sense. I never argued he had any business doing what he
did, but your logic is bizarre.

> > It's kind of like thinking Vick deserved to be banned from the NFL
> > because he hurt dogs, but Leonard Little killed someone, but hey, he
> > can come back whenever he wants.
>
> > Ridiculous.
>
> Both Vick and Little deserved to be banned for life. I just hope
> someone catches Vick one day and snaps his neck. And yes I do mean
> that literally.

But Little you can let slide?

What a moron.

Brent

Message has been deleted

Ritchie

unread,
Dec 15, 2010, 2:34:15 PM12/15/10
to
On Dec 15, 9:18 am, graybeard <graybe...@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:10:42 -0800 (PST) Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >I dont believe in second chances when it comes to stupidity.
>
> Please, for their sake, don't ever have children. Children do stupid
> things. Even after they grow up. But I guess that's hard for you to
> relate to, since you have apparently never done or said anything stupid
> in your entire life. Oops...
> --
> graybeard

I despise children so I never wanted nor had any. I was lucky to find
a woman that shared my view on children and didnt want any. Thank God
the biological clock bs didnt kick in with her cause I would have sent
her packing. I equal children to rats that have to be clothed and fed.
Instead of insulting comments, why don't you try to have an
intelligent discussion? Or because of your handle you might be to old
to do so. Either way I couldn't care less about children or how people
feel about them. They are a nuisance to me and parents let them get
away with too much because they are children. Now can we get back to
football?

Ritchie

unread,
Dec 15, 2010, 2:44:42 PM12/15/10
to
On Dec 15, 7:57 am, RaginPage <btpage0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 15, 6:38 am, RaginPage <btpage0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > That's why you guys look like such morons.  Someone standing still
> > > sticking their knee out in no way, shape or form, would ever be
> > > characterized as assault.
>
> > I guess you really don't know the law. You should study up on the law
> > and what can and cant be done before you comment on it. Charges of
> > assault can be brought up on anyone for the most simplest and innocent
> > of things.
>
> Of course they can be brought up.  But they don't stick for idiotic
> things like that.  Perhaps you should consider what a judge might just
> do to a DA that would waste the courts time with such a case.

Well being a retired police officer and now an attorney I cant tell
you from personal exp that I have seen assault charges brought of for
less and they have not only stuck and the person has been found guilty
but they have also done jail time. Also in NYS there really isn't much
that a judge can do to a DA or ADA in regards to punishing him or her.
All they can do is call for a review and usually nothing comes of it.
Dont believe what you see on TV. On TV they show DA's having power
over police officers in how they get reprimanded. That is as far from
the truth as possible in NYS. DA'ss/ADA's have no power over police
officers. Don't believe what you see on Law & Order.

> > > The guy was a jerk to do what he did, but I don't even see due cause
> > > for punishment to be honest with you.
>
> > > He wasn't on the field of play.  If football players can get away with
> > > body slamming someone into the ground by their facemask with only a
> > > penalty called, there is no way some low-level coach should get any
> > > kind of punishment for sticking his knee out 4 feet out of bounds.
>
> > He isn't a football player and was not on the field that's why he
> > deserves punishment. He had no business doing what he did. Try to
> > think with some intelligence, if possible.
>
> That makes no sense.  I never argued he had any business doing what he
> did, but your logic is bizarre.

Only to you. You apparently lack comprehension skills.

> > > It's kind of like thinking Vick deserved to be banned from the NFL
> > > because he hurt dogs, but Leonard Little killed someone, but hey, he
> > > can come back whenever he wants.
>
> > > Ridiculous.
>
> > Both Vick and Little deserved to be banned for life. I just hope
> > someone catches Vick one day and snaps his neck. And yes I do mean
> > that literally.
>
> But Little you can let slide?
>
> What a moron.

No I would not have let Little slide. he deserves to be banned also
and if by some chance someone hurt him on the field I, as if the same
thing happened to Vick would throw a party. Is there a need to resort
to name calling? Name calling is just a way an individual that cannot
communicate properly. Have some class and education.

RaginPage

unread,
Dec 15, 2010, 2:58:56 PM12/15/10
to
On Dec 15, 2:44 pm, Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 15, 7:57 am, RaginPage <btpage0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > > On Dec 15, 6:38 am, RaginPage <btpage0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > That's why you guys look like such morons.  Someone standing still
> > > > sticking their knee out in no way, shape or form, would ever be
> > > > characterized as assault.
>
> > > I guess you really don't know the law. You should study up on the law
> > > and what can and cant be done before you comment on it. Charges of
> > > assault can be brought up on anyone for the most simplest and innocent
> > > of things.
>
> > Of course they can be brought up.  But they don't stick for idiotic
> > things like that.  Perhaps you should consider what a judge might just
> > do to a DA that would waste the courts time with such a case.
>
> Well being a retired police officer and now an attorney I cant tell
> you from personal exp that I have seen assault charges brought of for
> less and they have not only stuck and the person has been found guilty
> but they have also done jail time.

You wish. Not on your life. You are full of it.

>Also in NYS there really isn't much
> that a judge can do to a DA or ADA in regards to punishing him or her.
> All they can do is call for a review and usually nothing comes of it.

They can get disbarred if it is bad enough.

> Dont believe what you see on TV. On TV they show DA's having power
> over police officers in how they get reprimanded. That is as far from
> the truth as possible in NYS. DA'ss/ADA's have no power over police
> officers. Don't believe what you see on Law & Order.

I don't watch Law and Order.

Yet you express outrage over Vick, who WAS punished, and none over
Little, who was not.

Sorry, I meant maroon.

Brent

Deadmeat

unread,
Dec 15, 2010, 3:22:07 PM12/15/10
to

The way you speak, it's a wonder how you found any woman at all.

It's really to fucking bad your parents didn't feel the same way as you,
and I still don't believe you weren't fired from being a cop.

I don't KF to many idiots, but you are one.

Ritchie

unread,
Dec 15, 2010, 4:08:32 PM12/15/10
to

Vick wasn't punished enough and Little should have been punished even
more severely than Vick was. I don't like what either of the two did.

Antonio Veranos

unread,
Dec 15, 2010, 4:11:58 PM12/15/10
to
[Ritchie <ritch...@gmail.com>]
[Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:08:32 -0800 (PST)]

: Vick wasn't punished enough

Vick went to jail for two years for killing some animals.

Do you eat meat, Ritchie?

--
Antonio Veranos

What color does a smurf go when you choke it?

Ritchie

unread,
Dec 15, 2010, 4:22:23 PM12/15/10
to

> The way you speak, it's a wonder how you found any woman at all.

Still together 22 years later and very happily child free. Since my
retirement we have traveled all over the world and have vacationed in
places most people can only dream of affording. If we had any
children, we would still be paying for them and would have never seen
all that we have seen. Having children isn't for everyone and we both
knew that it wasnt for us. When we are gone all that we own (homes,
properties, autos and so on) will be auctioned off and the money will
be donated to various charities and non profit organizations that we
have supported throughout the years. And even though we don't like
children, we have been supporters of the St Jude hospital for children
with cancer. We have done this because no child should suffer from
cancer without the possibility of health care. We may not like, want
or tolerate them but that doesn't mean they should suffer.

> It's really to fucking bad your parents didn't feel the same way as you,
> and I still don't believe you weren't fired from being a cop.

That's your problem. I had a great career in the department with
several medals and very proud of what I did. I even delivered 2 babies
and contrary to what people say, its not a beautiful exp. Its
disgusting, messy and gross.

> I don't KF to many idiots, but you are one.

The same can go for you.

Ritchie

unread,
Dec 15, 2010, 4:24:51 PM12/15/10
to
On Dec 15, 4:11 pm, Antonio Veranos <summerstorm0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> [Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com>]

> [Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:08:32 -0800 (PST)]
>
> :  Vick wasn't punished enough
>
> Vick went to jail for two years for killing some animals.

I like animals more than people

> Do you eat meat, Ritchie?

Yes I do but that last time I checked, unless a person is oriental we
dont eat dogs or cats.

marcman

unread,
Dec 15, 2010, 4:46:28 PM12/15/10
to

Asian. The word you're looking for is "Asian."

Antonio Veranos

unread,
Dec 15, 2010, 4:50:00 PM12/15/10
to
[Ritchie <ritch...@gmail.com>]
[Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:24:51 -0800 (PST)]

: > :  Vick wasn't punished enough
: >
: > Vick went to jail for two years for killing some animals.
:
: I like animals more than people
:
: > Do you eat meat, Ritchie?
:
: Yes I do but that last time I checked, unless a person is oriental we
: dont eat dogs or cats.

Oriental? Seems like you have bigger problems than worrying about what
goes on in someone else's life. Vick's paid for and is atoning for his
major errors/faults... good luck with yours.

marcman

unread,
Dec 15, 2010, 5:00:02 PM12/15/10
to
On Dec 15, 4:50 pm, Antonio Veranos <summerstorm0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> [Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com>]
> [Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:24:51 -0800 (PST)]
>
> : > :  Vick wasn't punished enough
> : >
> : > Vick went to jail for two years for killing some animals.
> :
> : I like animals more than people
> :
> : > Do you eat meat, Ritchie?
> :
> : Yes I do but that last time I checked, unless a person is oriental we
> : dont eat dogs or cats.
>
> Oriental?  

At least he didn't call them chinks. ;)

RaginPage

unread,
Dec 15, 2010, 5:04:55 PM12/15/10
to
On Dec 15, 4:24 pm, Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 15, 4:11 pm, Antonio Veranos <summerstorm0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > [Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com>]
> > [Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:08:32 -0800 (PST)]
>
> > :  Vick wasn't punished enough
>
> > Vick went to jail for two years for killing some animals.
>
> I like animals more than people
>

Wow, that's a surprise.

It shows.

Brent

Ritchie

unread,
Dec 15, 2010, 7:27:58 PM12/15/10
to
On Dec 15, 4:50 pm, Antonio Veranos <summerstorm0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> [Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com>]

Ritchie

unread,
Dec 15, 2010, 7:30:25 PM12/15/10
to
On Dec 15, 4:50 pm, Antonio Veranos <summerstorm0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> [Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com>]
> [Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:24:51 -0800 (PST)]
>
> : > :  Vick wasn't punished enough
> : >
> : > Vick went to jail for two years for killing some animals.
> :
> : I like animals more than people
> :
> : > Do you eat meat, Ritchie?
> :
> : Yes I do but that last time I checked, unless a person is oriental we
> : dont eat dogs or cats.
>
> Oriental?  Seems like you have bigger problems than worrying about what
> goes on in someone else's life.  Vick's paid for and is atoning for his
> major errors/faults... good luck with yours.

It was an attempt at a little humor but it backfired, not that it
really matters. Vick is doing it not because he realizes that what he
did was wrong, but because he wants to play and make money again. Most
criminals never really do care that what they did was wrong.

Ritchie

unread,
Dec 15, 2010, 7:31:19 PM12/15/10
to
On Dec 15, 5:00 pm, marcman <marcmanstud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 15, 4:50 pm, Antonio Veranos <summerstorm0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > [Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com>]
> > [Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:24:51 -0800 (PST)]
>
> > : > :  Vick wasn't punished enough
> > : >
> > : > Vick went to jail for two years for killing some animals.
> > :
> > : I like animals more than people
> > :
> > : > Do you eat meat, Ritchie?
> > :
> > : Yes I do but that last time I checked, unless a person is oriental we
> > : dont eat dogs or cats.
>
> > Oriental?  
>
> At least he didn't call them chinks. ;)

Like I said it was an attempt at a little humor.

Antonio Veranos

unread,
Dec 15, 2010, 7:35:40 PM12/15/10
to
[Ritchie <ritch...@gmail.com>]
[Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:30:25 -0800 (PST)]

: Vick is doing it not because he realizes that what he


: did was wrong, but because he wants to play and make money again.

You read minds, eh? Interesting skill to have.

: Most


: criminals never really do care that what they did was wrong.

You know this how, Claven?

marcman

unread,
Dec 15, 2010, 8:19:48 PM12/15/10
to

Bro, you don't know that!

> Most
> criminals never really do care that what they did was wrong.

Even if that statement's true, and I suspect it probably is, it's
still "most" and not "all."

You have no idea what Vick really thinks.

marcman

unread,
Dec 15, 2010, 8:21:05 PM12/15/10
to

I thought it was a little funny. :)

Ritchie

unread,
Dec 15, 2010, 9:02:02 PM12/15/10
to
On Dec 15, 7:35 pm, Antonio Veranos <summerstorm0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> [Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com>]
> [Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:30:25 -0800 (PST)]
>
> :  Vick is doing it not because he realizes that what he
> : did was wrong, but because he wants to play and make money again.
>
> You read minds, eh?  Interesting skill to have.
>
> : Most
> : criminals never really do care that what they did was wrong.
>
> You know this how, Claven?

long time experiences with criminals.

Ritchie

unread,
Dec 15, 2010, 9:04:05 PM12/15/10
to
On Dec 15, 8:19 pm, marcman <marcmanstud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Even if that statement's true, and I suspect it probably is, it's
> still "most" and not "all."
>
> You have no idea what Vick really thinks

True, but from my experience the law of averages is definitely on my
side. :)

Ritchie

unread,
Dec 15, 2010, 9:05:36 PM12/15/10
to
On Dec 15, 7:35 pm, Antonio Veranos <summerstorm0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> [Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com>]
> [Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:30:25 -0800 (PST)]
>
> :  Vick is doing it not because he realizes that what he
> : did was wrong, but because he wants to play and make money again.
>
> You read minds, eh?  Interesting skill to have.

No, I just know from experiences with P.O.S.'s how they usually think.

MuahMan

unread,
Dec 16, 2010, 1:06:28 AM12/16/10
to
On Dec 15, 4:24 pm, Ritchie <ritchie1...@gmail.com> wrote:

So a cat or dogs life is worth less than that of a chicken or cow?

Michael Press

unread,
Dec 16, 2010, 10:25:04 PM12/16/10
to
In article <4d09236d$0$9682$c3e8da3$e408...@news.astraweb.com>,
Deadmeat <no...@home.com> wrote:

Do not give him the satisfaction.

--
Michael Press

0 new messages