Re: Gholston - 1 tackle, 0 sacks
Harlan Lachman
buRford <buR...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 16:38:11 -0500, graybeard <gray...@invalid.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> >That gives him 6 solo tackles, 0 sacks, 0 passes defended, and 0 forced
> >fumbles for the year. If this waste of space isn't gone next year, I for
> >one am going to be really pissed.
>
> Come on, gray, he's doing a great job... I heard Rex say that recently.
Guys, lets just hope he does not get sack in the last meaningless game,
triggering a huge bonus.
Frankly, if they sign him to the minimum, I would not mind if he remains
on the roster.
h
papa.carl44
"graybeard" <gray...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:h9dfh61alsqr25ne5...@4ax.com...
> That gives him 6 solo tackles, 0 sacks, 0 passes defended, and 0 forced
> fumbles for the year. If this waste of space isn't gone next year, I for
> one am going to be really pissed.
> graybeard
ABSOLUTELY...and another wasted roster spot...what might have been with that
space open?
papa.carl44
"Harlan Lachman" <har...@eeivt.com> wrote in message
news:harlan-7C9802....@news60.forteinc.com...
H...he is taking up space, and with the rules as they are...he needs to
go...some aggressive rookie will do better and may even contribute on
special teams...which seem to have developed some issues on coverage. Think
of all the wasted spaces on this team....that simply will not make it
happen.
MuahMan
annual pro-bowler.
Harlan Lachman
graybeard <gray...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 18:37:29 -0500 Harlan Lachman <har...@eeivt.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Frankly, if they sign him to the minimum, I would not mind if he remains
> >on the roster.
>
> To do what? Take up a spot that could be used for a more productive
> player?
While he was not out a lot, he actually makes plays as a position player
and ST player. Just not sacks or pressures.
h
Harlan Lachman
graybeard <gray...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 22:08:39 -0500 Harlan Lachman <har...@eeivt.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <9blfh6tde5q17f91k...@4ax.com>,
> > graybeard <gray...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 18:37:29 -0500 Harlan Lachman <har...@eeivt.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Frankly, if they sign him to the minimum, I would not mind if he remains
> >> >on the roster.
> >>
> >> To do what? Take up a spot that could be used for a more productive
> >> player?
> >
> >While he was not out a lot, he actually makes plays as a position player
> >and ST player. Just not sacks or pressures.
> >
> >h
>
> Well, whatever plays you are referring to, they are obviously not the
> kind that help win games.
Gray, all good plays help win games. Just like all dumb play calls, poor
execution, poor efforts contribute to losses. On a drive I think we gave
up a TD, Ghost made a great play going across the field for a loss (I
refuse to watch the game again to report the exact combination of
events).
Others failed to step up but his play could have contributed to a big
stop. That stop could have helped win a game.
H
RickyBobby
news:41a072c3-a828-45b6...@r29g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
If the Patriots picked this guy up. Belicheck would mold him into a
annual pro-bowler.
i emphatically agree with this statement, kudos