Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Who must go?

12 views
Skip to first unread message

CaptMyng

unread,
Jan 25, 2011, 2:24:12 PM1/25/11
to
Vernon Gholston
Jason Taylor
Eric Smith
Santonio Holmes
Kellen Clemons
Nick Folk
Joe McNight
Tony Richardson
LT
Steve Weatherford
Ben Hartsock

Anyone else?

Michael

unread,
Jan 25, 2011, 4:39:55 PM1/25/11
to

MUST go ??? Not sure any of them MUST go...

There are only two current players on the Jets that I wanna see go.

Gholston (he's had more than enough time to improve and has not. not
one little bit. he is not even a special teams stand out. he is a
waste of a roster spot. take the pain and free up a roster spot.)

Folk (his head is gone)

papa.carl44

unread,
Jan 25, 2011, 5:25:16 PM1/25/11
to

"Michael" <mjd...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:f3b879d9-9247-4033...@r40g2000prh.googlegroups.com...


Michael...to your two I'd add possibly Weatherford and would add Hartsock,
Clemons plus I think Taylor has said this was it. I would NOT get rid of
Eric Smith...he is a good underneath dime back and can hit, it's a question
of him being used in the right places. I would not get rid of McNight just
yet only based on his play against Buffalo and also because we have no idea
what is left in LT's tank now. Richardson will probably retire, Ellis will
most likely go.....they could be looking for a WHOLE lot of people.


Michael

unread,
Jan 25, 2011, 6:11:57 PM1/25/11
to
On Jan 25, 5:25 pm, "papa.carl44" <papadotc...@nospamverizon.net>
wrote:
> "Michael" <mjd1...@verizon.net> wrote in message

I probably would not get rid of Clemens... He knows the offense and
actually looked good in the pre season this year. Up until the
playoffs started Weatherford was one of the best punters in the
league. I dont know what happened, but he was just so good for the
entire regular season. May be he had some sort of an injury we dont
know about or perhaps he cant punt in the cold ??? Hartsock is a
ditto for me too... They can find better for the same money on a late
rounder at that position.

papa.carl44

unread,
Jan 25, 2011, 8:30:57 PM1/25/11
to

"Michael" <mjd...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:3e86a205-65aa-49f3...@i32g2000pri.googlegroups.com...

The Jets have always had this issue with kickers and punters it seems....IF
he can't kick in cold weather and at the end of a season...they don't need
him....I think they made a huge mistake with the kicking game this year,
OMHO. They really need a couple good young TE's....that would help the
whole scheme a lot, if they could get a guy who can block a little and catch
in the seam, they are golden, and can use Keller in tight slots etc, a trips
situation with a TE who can actually catch could really help them. I saw
one preseason game and did not think that much of Clemmons....I think they
need a better backup and there should be some around. Brunell has to be out
now I would think...how old is he?


Michael

unread,
Jan 25, 2011, 8:39:19 PM1/25/11
to
On Jan 25, 8:30 pm, "papa.carl44" <papadotc...@nospamverizon.net>
> now I would think...how old is he?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

i think brunell is 41 y/o he looked good to me when he played in the
buff game... but yeah... they could use a good back-up. how much
longer can brunell hold up ??? i also think they made a big mistake
getting rid of feeley... they jets have not had a great kicker since
lahey... if you wanna do the ground and pound stuff with defense, you
gotta have a money kicker and punter. 3 points and field position are
key

papa.carl44

unread,
Jan 25, 2011, 10:21:10 PM1/25/11
to

"Michael" <mjd...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:6cc7adb8-6081-4eb0...@e20g2000vbn.googlegroups.com...

What I'm really thinking now is this crap is all over...and I can now go and
just live...not have to involve myself with any more Jets drama and
disappointment :-) I'm too old to wait any longer, so I think I'll just
give it all up :-) I've got a lot of other stuff to do, and time is getting
more and more limited. We'll all come back to this next year I guess.


Michael

unread,
Jan 25, 2011, 10:39:14 PM1/25/11
to
On Jan 25, 10:21 pm, "papa.carl44" <papadotc...@nospamverizon.net>
> more and more limited.  We'll all come back to this next year I guess.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

over ??? no way... lead up to the draft now :-)

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

CaptMyng

unread,
Jan 26, 2011, 8:43:21 AM1/26/11
to
On Jan 25, 1:24 pm, CaptMyng <dfu...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Anyone else?

Oh yeah, Kris Jenkins needs to go.
He's an outstanding NT (when healthy) and a good man but the team
needs a player that actually plays in a game now and then. The money
would be better spent an a replacement that doesn't have 2 creaky
knees.

cd

unread,
Jan 26, 2011, 9:07:44 AM1/26/11
to

I don't get how the Steelers run the same defense and their LB's are
always in the backfield distrupting or sacking the QB. The team
doesn't have speed at LB, and that is more than any other reason that
they got killed by Mendenhall. In the second half, the Steelers
continued to make every play they had to make to win. Harris is
superb, but he can't be the only guy, Jets desperately need rushers.
I think Peppers over Cromartie was the play last year and unless I'm
wrong, they have to give Chargers now a 2nd round pick for a one year
loaner. I would like to add Bart Scott to the list, way overrated.

Message has been deleted

CaptMyng

unread,
Jan 26, 2011, 11:29:26 AM1/26/11
to
On Jan 26, 8:38 am, John C TX <johnctxj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> X-No-Archive: Yes

>
> > > Anyone else?
>
> > Oh yeah, Kris Jenkins needs to go.
> > He's an outstanding NT (when healthy) and a good man but the team
> > needs a player that actually plays in a game now and then. The money
> > would be better spent an a replacement that doesn't have 2 creaky
> > knees.
>
> He is due a lot of money but how about this?
>
> He costs us $1.8 in dead space if cut.  So you restructure to get cap
> help with an incentive laden contract & if he stays healthy you may a
> great NT if he sucks he hasn't chewed up your cap space.

The problem then is you still don't have a replacement when he goes
down yet again. Better to bite the bullet and find a replacement.

papa.carl44

unread,
Jan 26, 2011, 11:53:29 AM1/26/11
to

"cd" <cd...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:83896b10-004f-4441...@y19g2000prb.googlegroups.com...

The Steelers have people who are a serious threat in a down position...HUGE
difference for the LB's


papa.carl44

unread,
Jan 26, 2011, 11:54:42 AM1/26/11
to

"John C TX" <johnc...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:332f7990-ab4e-4861...@y9g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> X-No-Archive: Yes

>
>> > Anyone else?
>>
>> Oh yeah, Kris Jenkins needs to go.
>> He's an outstanding NT (when healthy) and a good man but the team
>> needs a player that actually plays in a game now and then. The money
>> would be better spent an a replacement that doesn't have 2 creaky
>> knees.
>
> He is due a lot of money but how about this?
>
> He costs us $1.8 in dead space if cut. So you restructure to get cap
> help with an incentive laden contract & if he stays healthy you may a
> great NT if he sucks he hasn't chewed up your cap space.

He is done...guys that big who repeatedly have leg issues don't come back.
OMHO...now watch him start running marathons :-)


Michael

unread,
Jan 26, 2011, 12:30:53 PM1/26/11
to
On Jan 26, 11:54 am, "papa.carl44" <papadotc...@nospamverizon.net>
wrote:
> "John C TX" <johnctxj...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:332f7990-ab4e-4861...@y9g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

time for the anual jenkins-bob sanders poll

who goes out first ???

i say both go out in the first half of the first game

javaman91

unread,
Jan 26, 2011, 12:46:17 PM1/26/11
to
Message has been deleted

papa.carl44

unread,
Jan 26, 2011, 1:58:38 PM1/26/11
to

"javaman91" <Java...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:171c1ac0-820e-40e3...@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com...

> I'm sure everyone's seen this in today's DN...
>
> http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/football/jets/keepordump2010/index.html


Interesting...a lot of Kumbaya stuff...everybody wanted back...except
Gholston and of course Schott....and the kickers, and I see folks have seen
that LT is not going to be the all down back for long.


Message has been deleted

John C TX

unread,
Jan 26, 2011, 2:24:06 PM1/26/11
to
buRford <buRf...@buR.ford.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 05:39:36 -0800 (PST), John C TX <johnctxj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> >> The only ones in this list I think we definitely keep, are McKnight & Smith.
> >> Gholston's gone.
>
> >McKnight will be back but Smith could be a problem to sign if someone
> >needs a KR & likes the wildcat.  Gholston who?
>
> I was speaking about Eric, who was on his list.  I think Brad will give the Jets every
> opportunity to sign him.  He doesn't seem like a money first guy... he's in a good
> situation here.

X-No-Archive: Yes

We need both Smiths. We are thin at safety right now & ESmith appears
to be Rex' choice over Pool.

I have no idea what Brad Smith will do. He is an idiot if he doesn't
take the best deal and best = most money. It can be close with a
chance of playing & getting paid again. Someone should buy him a jugs
machine.

Message has been deleted

CaptMyng

unread,
Jan 26, 2011, 2:45:03 PM1/26/11
to
On Jan 26, 1:19 pm, John C TX <johnctxj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> > The problem then is you still don't have a replacement when he goes
> > down yet again. Better to bite the bullet and find a replacement.
>
> Myng, if you restructure so as to pay him approximately $1.8MM which
> is what he will cost & give him incentives then what have you lost?
> He is taking up $1.8MM in cap space anyway.

My concern is that they end up paying him $1.8MM to rehab another knee
injury.You might as well free up the roster spot to look at
alternatives.

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Harlan Lachman

unread,
Jan 31, 2011, 7:03:39 PM1/31/11
to
In article <z8-dneSHLdND893Q...@giganews.com>,
"papa.carl44" <papad...@nospamverizon.net> wrote:

Weatherford is my third favorite Jet to be gone.

Eric Smith tops my list. Shott wipes up second. And Weatherford demands
a chance to choke and do dumb things elsewhere.

h

papa.carl44

unread,
Jan 31, 2011, 8:46:32 PM1/31/11
to

"Harlan Lachman" <har...@eeivt.com> wrote in message
news:harlan-518A9F....@news60.forteinc.com...

You are making a mistake on Smith...somebody will use him correctly, the way
Rex did at the end of the season. The issue is a couple of the other guys
who can not play underneath the way Smith can. People expect safeties to be
great cover guys, and if they were...they'd be corners. Early on they kept
putting Smith in "safety support in the over position and he is just not
fast enough and doesn't have the feet to do that, but that does not make him
a bad player, when he was put in a position he can contribute in he did very
well, in fact, he was the ONLY one on D who came to play during the first
half of the last game.


Message has been deleted

papa.carl44

unread,
Feb 1, 2011, 10:32:06 AM2/1/11
to

"John C TX" <johnc...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2839eb5c-5a1e-49f3...@u11g2000prk.googlegroups.com...
X-No-Archive: Yes


>
> > Weatherford is my third favorite Jet to be gone.

I think he can't kick in the cold.


>
> > Eric Smith tops my list. Shott wipes up second. And Weatherford demands
> > a chance to choke and do dumb things elsewhere.
>
> > h
>
> You are making a mistake on Smith...somebody will use him correctly, the
> way
> Rex did at the end of the season. The issue is a couple of the other guys
> who can not play underneath the way Smith can. People expect safeties to
> be
> great cover guys, and if they were...they'd be corners. Early on they kept
> putting Smith in "safety support in the over position and he is just not
> fast enough and doesn't have the feet to do that, but that does not make
> him
> a bad player, when he was put in a position he can contribute in he did
> very
> well, in fact, he was the ONLY one on D who came to play during the first
> half of the last game.

I came around on Smith as my early knock on him is he wouldn't tackle
not that he wouldn't try just that he coudln't finish it.

I have come around and I have to believe knowledge of this defense has
to have some value.

I think the big thing is they put him where he is comfortable playing....he
is good in the short game covering the seam I think, the inside underneath
game and run support.....you know, I can not get interested in this Super
Bowl...not in the least.


Message has been deleted

javaman91

unread,
Feb 1, 2011, 4:45:25 PM2/1/11
to
On Tuesday, February 1, 2011 10:43:49 AM UTC-5, John C TX wrote:
> X-No-Archive: Yes

>
> > I think the big thing is they put him where he is comfortable playing....he
> > is good in the short game covering the seam I think, the inside underneath
> > game and run support.....you know, I can not get interested in this Super
> > Bowl...not in the least.
>
> It is tough to think we were that close.

Tough is a good way to describe it. Gut-wrenching is another...

papa.carl44

unread,
Feb 1, 2011, 8:03:04 PM2/1/11
to

"John C TX" <johnc...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:032f59d7-80a1-4d5a...@l11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> X-No-Archive: Yes

>
>> I think the big thing is they put him where he is comfortable
>> playing....he
>> is good in the short game covering the seam I think, the inside
>> underneath
>> game and run support.....you know, I can not get interested in this Super
>> Bowl...not in the least.
>
> It is tough to think we were that close.

It's even more than that....I have NO interest in the Steelers....I just
don't care, don't even feel like watching it really, but probably will and
root for the Pack.


Message has been deleted

papa.carl44

unread,
Feb 1, 2011, 11:57:28 PM2/1/11
to

"John C TX" <johnc...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:067b70e9-3ee1-442b...@p12g2000vbo.googlegroups.com...

> X-No-Archive: Yes
>>
>> >> I think the big thing is they put him where he is comfortable
>> >> playing....he
>> >> is good in the short game covering the seam I think, the inside
>> >> underneath
>> >> game and run support.....you know, I can not get interested in this
>> >> Super
>> >> Bowl...not in the least.
>>
>> > It is tough to think we were that close.
>>
>> It's even more than that....I have NO interest in the Steelers....I just
>> don't care, don't even feel like watching it really, but probably will
>> and
>> root for the Pack.
> I wanted to go Pack because ben r is an ass, worse than Vick, and
> favre saw Rodgers had talent but what I now see is that the Pack mgt
> was afraid.
>
> They could have gotten a # 1 from the Vikings. I hope they fall short.

Nope....I can never take the side of The Steelers....Ben R. skated on some
serious crap and clearly demonstrated a pattern of behavior...he got away
with it because he was a QB, White, and a Steeler with the franchise /
family connections, OMHO.


Harlan Lachman

unread,
Feb 1, 2011, 11:59:39 PM2/1/11
to
In article <trednWcE2M9l-NrQ...@giganews.com>,
"papa.carl44" <papad...@nospamverizon.net> wrote:

Papa, not knowing the assignments, I may be wrong.

But even when folks are counting (and lauding the number of) his
tackles, etc., the Smith I see makes tackles starting inside the ten
yard marker and most times they end up past it. He still makes the
unnecessary late hit. He is still late to too many plays (and I have a
hard time thinking that is his assignment). I have not seen him make a
big play like a Jason Taylor does more than once or a Calvin Pace.

Slow safeties make no sense to me.

And, I may be wrong.

h

Harlan Lachman

unread,
Feb 2, 2011, 12:01:11 AM2/2/11
to
In article <opWdnR4MaMqlMNXQ...@giganews.com>,
"papa.carl44" <papad...@nospamverizon.net> wrote:

Just turned down a delicious invite to watch the game with friends. I
too have no interest in watching the Steelers hold, get calls, and
possibly win.

I fear we missed our opportunity. I hope not. But not many teams get to
the Championship game three years in a row.

h

Message has been deleted

Michael

unread,
Feb 2, 2011, 12:26:33 PM2/2/11
to
On Feb 2, 12:01 am, Harlan Lachman <har...@eeivt.com> wrote:

<snip>

> Just turned down a delicious invite to watch the game with friends. I
> too have no interest in watching the Steelers hold, get calls, and
> possibly win.

a-men

Michael

unread,
Feb 2, 2011, 12:29:59 PM2/2/11
to
On Feb 2, 8:17 am, John C TX <johnctxj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> > > They could have gotten a # 1 from the Vikings. I hope they fall short.
>
> > Nope....I can never take the side of The Steelers....Ben R. skated on some
> > serious crap and clearly demonstrated a pattern of behavior...he got away
> > with it because he was a QB, White, and a Steeler with the franchise /
> > family connections, OMHO.
>
> OK, I am back with the Packers.
>
> What I find most horrifying after the bathroom scene is that he ruined
> two cops careers.  Granted they wanted to play jock sniffer and they
> could have abated a felony so they are idiots but when I hear him
> talking about redemption where is their's?  You know he can't write
> them a check.  I would love to hear someone ask him about the young
> woman & the two dopey cops.

the cops got snaked worse then any of them. ben still has an nfl
career and lots of money. the girl unquestionably got compen$ated.
unless she is totally traumatized by the incendent, it wont cost the
girls career or future. the two cops are out of their careers. what
does a former cop do ??? probably they wont even be able to get jobs
as security guards. they got fucked over badly for their portion.

Message has been deleted

Michael

unread,
Feb 2, 2011, 1:13:11 PM2/2/11
to
On Feb 2, 12:35 pm, John C TX <johnctxj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> > the cops got snaked worse then any of them.  ben still has an nfl
> > career and lots of money.  the girl unquestionably got compen$ated.
> > unless she is totally traumatized by the incendent, it wont cost the
> > girls career or future.  the two cops are out of their careers. what
> > does a former cop do ??? probably they wont even be able to get jobs
> > as security guards.  they got fucked over badly for their portion.
>
> I have mixed emotions as I am not sure what was going on but if they
> even sensed that it was an inch past consensual sex and held the door,
> kept her friends away, etc. they deserve to lose their badge.

john... i agree... if they had some idea that there was an assault
going on, not only should they be taken out of the uniform, they
should be convicted as accessories to sexual assault. as much of a
scum bag as big ben appears to be, i am not 100 % convinced that this
was really a criminal assault. more so, even if it was an assault,
the cops might not have known it... for all we know, they thought were
just "running blocher" so their celebrity client could get a blow job
in peace. for sure it was poor conduct, but i cant call them
accessories. i don't know much about how cops handle their matters,
but would they strip a guy of his badge if he was off duty and "ran
blocker" for a friend who wanted to get laid in a public bathroom ???
is such a conduct issue grounds for dismissal ???

0 new messages